Capgemini-订阅模式的兴起:卡车所有权的革命性变革(英)_第1页
Capgemini-订阅模式的兴起:卡车所有权的革命性变革(英)_第2页
Capgemini-订阅模式的兴起:卡车所有权的革命性变革(英)_第3页
Capgemini-订阅模式的兴起:卡车所有权的革命性变革(英)_第4页
Capgemini-订阅模式的兴起:卡车所有权的革命性变革(英)_第5页
已阅读5页,还剩35页未读 继续免费阅读

下载本文档

版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领

文档简介

TheRiseofSubscriptionModels:RevolutionizingTruckOwnership

Exploringthebenefitsandacceptanceofflexiblefleetsolutions

Executivesummary

Arecentsurveyoftruckcustomers

conductedbyCapgeminisupports

majortruckOEMs’existingbeliefs

andexpectationsforsubscription

models,particularlythoserelating

toelectricvehicles.Theresearchalso

addsimportantinsights,forexample

thatmanycustomerswouldprefer

toobtainsubscriptionsdirectlyfrom

manufacturers,andthatsubscriptionscouldhelptoovercometheperceptionthatelectricvehiclesarenotaffordable.Inthisreport,wecommentonthe

resultsandproposeactionsthattruckOEMsshouldbeinitiatingnow,suchascreatingastrategytoaddresskeycustomerconcerns,andinforming

customersbetteronissueslikethe

respectivetotalcostofownership/useforconventionalandelectrictrucks.

2TheRiseofSubscriptionModels

Contents

Introduction5

Researchmethod6

Summaryoffindings7

Findingspart1:marketacceptabilityofthesubscriptionmodel7

Findingspart2:marketreadinessforcommercialelectricvehicles12

Discussionandrecommendations15

HowCapgeminihelpsclients17

implementsubscriptionmodels

Authors19

3

“Inthepassengercarsector,wecan

alreadyobservethatmovingfromICE

vehiclestoEVsisassociatedwithamovefromownershiptousage–implyingthatsubscriptionmodelswillbecomemore

popular.Ournewstudysuggeststhat

thistrendcouldbeevenmoresignificantfortrucks,partlybecauseofaffordabilityissuesbutalsobecauseofuncertainty

aboutEVsandtheirimpactonresidual

values.Thestudyalsopointstothe

potentialofsubscriptionstoaccelerate

uptakeofzero-emissionvehicles.This

findingshouldgeneratefurtherdiscussion

andapossiblerethinkofcurrentapproachestopromotingEVs.”

LaurenceNoël

HeadofGlobalAutomotiveIndustryCapgemini

4TheRiseofSubscriptionModels

Introduction

Majortruckmanufacturersareactivelyexploringnewownershipmodels,includingsubscriptionmodels.Inthesemodels,customerspayforthe

useoftruckswhilethemanufacturerorotherserviceproviderretainsownershipoftheassets.Therearevariantswherecustomerstake

ownershipofthevehiclesbutobtainbatteriesonasubscriptionbasis.

However,thereisalackofharddataaboutthelevelsofacceptanceforthemodelsamongtruckcustomers,andaboutcustomerexpectationsandpreferences.

Toshedlightonthesequestions,Capgeminirecentlyconductedasurveywhichexploredtheacceptabilitytotruckcustomersofsubscription

services,alongwithrelatedissuessuchaswillingnesstopayapremium,andwhichservicesshouldbeincludedinthesubscriptionmodel.

Wealsoinvestigatedourrespondents’preferencesforelectricvehicles

(EVs)versusinternalcombustionengine(ICE)vehiclesandusedtheresultstohelpusinterpretthefindingsaboutsubscriptions1.Wediscoveredsomeinterestingdifferencesbetweenthepreferencesofthesetwogroupswithrespecttosubscriptions.

Overall,thefindingsconfirmwhatwealreadyknewaboutsubscriptionsforcommercialvehicles,andsomajorOEMswhohavealreadygoneaheadin

thisareacanbeassuredthattheyarebroadlypursuingtherightstrategies.Butwealsomadesomesurprisingandpotentiallyhelpfuldiscoveries,whichwarrantfurtherinvestigation.

Thisreportoutlinesandcommentsonourresults,beforemakingsomerecommendationsforfurtherresearchandactions.

1.Pleasenotethatinthisreportweusetheterm“EVs”tocoverbothbatteryelectric

vehicles(BEVs)andhydrogenfuelcellelectricvehicles(FCEVs),unlessotherwisestated.

5

Researchmethod

NinetyrespondentsfromtruckcustomersinGermany,allofwhomwereascertainedtohaveastrong

engagementinthismarket,tookpartinthisonline

survey(Figure1).WedecidedtoresearchGermany

initiallybecausethismarketisespeciallyreceptiveto

newsalesmodelsandhasastrongimpetustomove

tozeroemissions.InthefuturewearekeentoexpandthisresearchtocoverthewholeofEurope,andperhapsNorthAmericaandChina.

Figure1:Backgroundtothesurvey

Surveyobjective

Theprimaryobjectiveofthesurveywastogatherdataontheacceptanceand

preferredimplementationofthetrucksubscriptionmodelintheGermanmarketanditsreadinesstouseelectricvehicles.

Surveyscope

andrespondents

Respondents’country

Numberofrespondents

90

Useofthefollowing

inrespondents'companies

•Heavyvehicles

•Bigbuses

•Tractors

•Specialvehicles

6TheRiseofSubscriptionModels

7

Summaryof

findings

Findingspart1:marketacceptabilityofthesubscriptionmodel

First,weexploredourrespondents’generalviewsonthesubscriptionmodel,andwhattheythinktheadvantagesanddisadvantagesfortheircompaniesare.

Perceivedadvantagesanddisadvantagesofsubscriptionmodels

Figure2:Reasonsforacceptanceofsubscriptionmodelsfortrucks

20%

Betterabilitytoplanexpensesduetoshortercommitmentperiods

25%

Abilitytotestaparticularvehiclemodel(e.g.anEV)overalongerperiodoftime

42%

Flexibilitytoabsorbshort-termcapacitypeaks

Thebiggestreasonforwantingtoadoptthe

subscriptionmodelistogaintheflexibilitytoabsorb

short-termcapacitypeaks(atechniquecalled“peak

shaving”),mentionedby42%ofrespondents(Figure

2).Thisfindingreflectsthefactthattheirbusinesses

habituallyfacefluctuatingdemand–perhapsmorethanusualgivencurrentlevelsofeconomicuncertaintyanddisruption,particularlytothesupplychain.Peakshavingisalsoanimportanttoolfordealingwithseasonal

demand,forexampleintherun-uptoChristmas.

Otherreasonsforacceptanceincludethedesiretotryoutspecificvehiclemodels,whichprobablyreflects

aninterestinexperimentingwithnewtechnologieswithoutlong-termcommitments.Themodelisalso

seenasusefulforplanningexpenditure,thankstotheshortercommitmentperiodsinvolved.

Whenaskedabouttheirreservationssurrounding

subscriptionmodels,respondentsoftenmentionthe

perceptionthatsubscriptionsareassociatedwith

highcosts–afindingthatreflectsthismarket’spricesensitivity(Figure3).

Tofindoutmore,theresearchinvestigatedhowlargeapremiumcompaniesarepreparedtopayforasubscriptionmodeloveralong-termlease,

Figure3:Objectionstosubscriptionmodelsfortrucks

25%

Complexityinprocessing/

62%

administrationHighcosts

andanalyzedtheresultsaccordingtowhetherthe

respondentisconsideringEVsornot.AsFigure12

shows,amajorityofrespondentsareconsideringEVs,atleasttosomeextent.

Interestingly,potentialEVcustomersarewillingto

paya10-15%premium,whereasthosewhopreferICEvehiclesareonlypreparedtopay5-10%(Figure4).

Figure4:Howmuchpremiumarerespondentswillingtopayforasubscriptionmodel?

15%

RespondentsconsideringEVuse

5%

RespondentsNOTconsideringEVuse

Asanotherpotentialobjectiontosubscriptions,respondentsalsomentioncomplexityof

administration,suggestingthattheydonotyet

associatesubscriptionswiththestraightforward,user-friendlymodelsthattheyprefer.

Preferredapplicationsforthesubscriptionmodel

Wealsotookamoredetailedlookathowrespondentsenvisageusingsubscriptionmodelswithintheir

businesses,withrespecttotheclassofvehicle,range

Around53%ofrespondentsareconsideringintegrating

BatteryElectricVehicles

(BEV)andFuelCellElectric

Vehicles(FCEV)intotheir

fleets.Thisgrowinginterestineco-friendlyoptionsis

accompaniedbyareadinesstoinvestinpremiumservices.ThoseconsideringEVsof

eithertypearewillingto

paya15%premiumfora

subscriptionmodel,whereasotherswillpayjust5%

premium.

overwhichtouseit,andsubscriptionperiod.WeagaincomparedtheresponsesforthoseconsideringEVs

versustherest.

Figure5:Optimalvehicleclassforsubscriptions

RespondentsconsideringEVuse·RespondentsNOTconsideringEVuse

Veryheavytrucks

HeavytrucksMedium-dutytrucks

LighttrucksLightcommercialtrucks

22%13%

19%21%15%

21%

Veryheavytrucks

25%

29%

29%

HeavytrucksMedium-dutytrucks

26%

LighttrucksLightcommercialtrucks

8TheRiseofSubscriptionModels

AsshowninFigure5,respondentsconsideringEVs

optforlighttomedium-dutytrucksbecausethey

haveenoughpositiveexperienceandknowledgeto

integratethosetrucksintotheirdailyschedulesand

routes.ThosepreferringICEvehiclesaremorelikely

inthelong-haulbusiness;thisexplainstheirdifferent

viewsregardingvehicleclassessuitableforsubscriptionmodels.Overall,heavytrucksareslightlylessfavoredcandidatesforsubscriptions,possiblyduetotheir

highercostsorspecificusagepatterns.Thisresponsemightalsobeduetothefactthatplanningtheusageoflong-haultrucksisofteneasierforcompaniesthanplanningmorelocalactivities,andsotheyarenot

lookingforabetterwaytodoit.

Questionedaboutthedistancerangeswherethey

wouldbelikelytoadoptsubscriptionmodels,

respondentsindicatethatthesemodelsareapplicableacrosslocal(upto50km),regional(51-150km),andlong-distance(151km+)ranges,withregionalusagelikelytobehighest(Figure7).Thissuggeststhattheflexibilityofsubscriptionscouldberelevanttoarangeofbusiness

needs,fromlocaldeliveriestolong-haultransportation.

Figure6:Preferreddistancerangesforadoptionofsubscriptionmodels

30%28%

LongdistanceLocalarea

42%

Regionalarea

Takentogether,thisandthepreviousfindingmay

implythatsubscriptiontrucksareseenasmostusefulforthetrafficbetweenregionaldepotsandtheend-

customeror(insomecases)localhubs.Itisgenerally

known–andconfirmedbythird-partyresearch–thattruckcustomersenvisagesimilarapplicationsforEVs,suggestingsynergiesbetweensubscriptionmodelsandelectrictrucks.

Whenitcomestocommitmentperiods,respondentsdemonstrateapreferenceforathree-monthperiod(Figure7).Thisfindingsuggeststhatbusinessesvalueshort-termcommitmentsforbetteradaptabilityandfinancialplanning.

Figure7:Preferredperiodforwhichtocommittoasubscription

15%

12

1%

9

24%

6

32%

3

7%

2

11%

1

Wefindthisresultslightlysurprisingaswewould

expectrespondentstopreferashortercommitmentperiodformaximumflexibility,especiallyinthelightofthedesireforpeakshaving.

Months

ThewillingnessofrespondentsconsideringEVstopaya

significantpremiumfor

subscriptionsindicatesarobustmarketpotentialforthismodel

amongfleetoperatorsprioritizingsustainabilityandinnovation.

9

Preferencesfordeliveryofthesubscriptionmodel

Next,weaskedformoredetailabouthowcompanieswouldliketoobtaintrucksubscriptions–including

whotheywouldliketoprovidethesubscriptions,

whethertheypreferafixedoraflexibleoffer,andtheirexpectationsaboutleadtimes.Wealsodiscussedwhattypeofenginetheywouldbelookingforinavehicle

obtainedbysubscription.

Figure8:Whoshouldofferthesubscriptionmodel?

Newsupplier,e.g.start-up

LeasingcompanywithwhichIdonothaveabusinessrelationshipyet

LeasingcompanywithwhichIalreadyhaveabusinessrelationship

Manufacturer

6%

11%

21%

49%

Interestingly,respondentsshowamarked

preferenceforobtainingsubscriptionsdirectlyfrom

manufacturers,with49%choosingthisoption(Figure8).Leasingcompaniesandnewsuppliersbothranksomewaybehindmanufacturers.

Formanufacturers,thispreferenceisaheartening

finding,andnotjustbecauseitlikelyindicatestrustinOEMs’establishedqualityandservicestandards.Italsoopensuppossibilitiesforfuturerevenuestreams.

Theseideashaveautomotivesustainabilitybenefitsaswellascommercialones,andwe’llreturntothemlater.

Slightlymorethanhalfofrespondentspreferaflexibleofferwithselectablemodulestoafixedone(Figure9).

Figure9:Shouldcustomersbeabletochoosedifferentmoduleswithinthesubscriptionmodel?

54%46%

Fixedofferwith

predefinedservicemodels

Flexibleofferwithfreelyselectablemodules

Thispreferencealignswiththedesireforcustomizable,adaptablesolutions,seeninallsectorsoftoday’s

automotiveindustry.

10TheRiseofSubscriptionModels

11

Figure10:Mostexpectedcomponentsinasubscriptionoffer

Maintenanceand

wearandtear

Insurance

24/7customerservice

Whenrespondentsareaskedwhichspecific

componentscompanieswouldliketoseeincludedin

theoffer,maintenanceandmakinggoodwearandteararethefirstchoice,followedbyinsurance,andthen

24/7customerservice(Figure10).

Whenitcomestoexpectationsabouttheleadtimefordeliveryofavehicleiftheytakeoutasubscription,themajoritypreferaleadtimeoflessthan1week(30%)tolessthan4weeks(24%).Thisindicatestheimportanceofquickserviceandhighvehicleavailabilitywhen

planningasubscription-basedoperation.

Wenowcometotheimportantquestionofwhatformofenginerespondentswouldchooseinrelationto

subscriptions.

Figure11:Preferreddrivetrainsforsubscriptions

28%

Pureelectric

42%

Diesel

9%

21%

Gasoline

Hybriddrive

Dieselaccountsforthehighestshareoftheresponses(42%overall),probablyreflectingitscurrentdominanceandampleinfrastructuresupportratherthanany

entrenchedpreference(Figure11).

Infact,pureelectricandhybridmodelstogetherarechosenbyevenmorerespondents(49%),suggestingconcernaboutenvironmentalconsiderationsand

opennesstonewtechnologies.(And,ifweconsideronlythelargestcompanies’responses,pureelectricemergesasthemostpopularoption.)

Theseresultspaintanencouragingpictureofthe

prospectsforelectrification.Theproportionof

respondentspreferringpureelectric–28%–might

seemlowatfirstsight,butitissignificantlymorethanpureelectric’sshareofthecurrentfleetinGermany.

Pureelectricandhybridmodels

togetherattract49%of

respondents,reflectinggrowingenvironmentalconcernsand

interestinnewtechnologies.Amongthelargestcompanies,pureelectricvehiclesarethemostpopular.

Findingspart2:marketreadinessforcommercialelectricvehicles

Respondents’interestinelectricvehicles

Aswehavejustseen,ourresearchrevealsencouraginglevelsofinterestinelectricorhybridvehiclesinthe

contextofasubscriptionmodel.Thenextsegment

ofourresearchprobesthisinterestfurther,byasking

abouttheextenttowhichorganizationsareconsideringEVsandwhattheyseeasthemainadvantagesand

barriersassociatedwithelectrification.

Figure12:AmajorityofrespondentsarealreadyconsideringtheuseofEVsintheirfleets

22%

40%

Notconsideringatall

Somewhatconsidering

13%

25%

StronglyconsideringNotconsideringmuch

Whenquestionedinthisslightlydifferentway,asmanyas22%ofrespondentssaytheyhavenotconsidered

electrificationatall,while25%haveonlyconsidereditalittle(Figure12).Thisseemsratherdisappointinggiventhemanyreasonstoconsiderit,including

environmentalconcerns,regulatorypressures,andadvancementsinEVtechnology.

Askedabouttheadvantagesofelectrification,manyrespondentsemphasizelocalemission-freeoperationandimprovedimage,highlightingenvironmentalandsocialresponsibilityconsiderations(Figure13).

Figure13:PerceivedadvantagesofusingEVs

Locallyemission-free,especiallyinurbanareas.

Improvedimageduetotheuseofenvironmentallyfriendlycommercialvehicles.

Mediaattentionandadvertisingeffectivenessasaperceivedfirstmover.

11%

8%

25%

12TheRiseofSubscriptionModels

Figure14:PerceiveddisadvantagesofusingEVs

Lowrange

Highacquisitioncosts Longidletimes(chargingtimes)Lowerpayload(duetobatteryweight)Highelectricitycosts

Highmaintenancecosts

33%

28%

18%

4%

37%

37%

Highacquisitioncostsandrangeanxietyremain

significantbarrierstoEVadoption,alongwithconcernsaboutchargingtimesandpayloadcapacity(Figure14).

Drillingdownintothedatauncoverssomeinterestinganglesonthisfinding.Forexample,ifwelookonlyat

respondentswhoareactivelyconsideringEVs,then

highercostsareabiggerconcernthanrange,whereasthosewhoarenotconsideringEVsaremoreconcerned

aboutrangethancost.Thissuggeststhatmore

knowledgeaboutEVs,includingtheiradvantagesandchallenges,leadstogreateracceptance.

Itisalsoworthnotingthatconcernsaboutacquisitioncostscouldbeusedtoargueforthesubscription

model.Indeed,Capgeminiresearchforvarious

commercialvehicleclientssuggeststhat,withbroad

usageofaholisticecosystemofservicesaugmentingtheEVtruck,thetotalcostofuse(TCU)couldbemuchlowerforEVsthanforconventionalICEvehicles.ThisobservationcouldhelpOEMstosellbothEVsand

subscriptionmodels.

13

GainingacceptanceforEVs

Finally,weaskedthoserespondentswhoare

consideringEVsaboutfactorsthatwillsecuretheir

acceptance,andspecificallyabouthowtheyprefertopayforcharging(flatrateversuspaymentperkWh).

Whenchoosingfactorsthatwouldsecuretheir

acceptanceofEVs,respondentstendtoemphasize

rangeandprice,suggestingthatpracticalityandcost-

effectivenessarekeytowideradoption(Figure15).

However,inbothcasesthepicturemayalreadybemorepositivethancompaniesrealize,soaswe’lldiscusslater,OEMsmayneedtoputmoreeffortintoinformingtheircustomers.

Figure15:MostimportantfactorsthatwouldconvincerespondentstouseEVs

Range

Price

PayloadCharginginfrastructure Chargingspeed PerformanceSustainability

TCO/TCU

13%

7%6%

4%

2%2%2%

21%

Chargingforenergy

Overall,numbersaresplitalmostequallybetween

RespondentswhoareinterestedinEVsfavorseparate

wantingtopayforelectricityaspartoftheusagefee

chargingforenergyconsumption,whereasthosewho

orbeingbilledseparatelyforit.Butaninteresting

wanttostaywithconventionalICEvehiclespreferanall-

pictureemergesfromanalyzingtheresultsaccordingtowhethertherespondentsareconsideringEVsorpreferICEvehicles.

inclusivesubscriptionthatincludesenergycosts(Figure16).

ig

Figure16:Shouldchargingbebilledseparatelyorincludedinthesubscriptionfee?

RespondentsconsideringtheuseofEVsRespondentsNOTconsideringtheuseofEVs

All-inclusivechargingcardwhereelectricityisincludedintheusagefee

Chargingcardthatisbilledandpaidforseparately

26%

21%

18%

30%

14TheRiseofSubscriptionModels

15

Discussionand

recommendations

Subscriptionmodelspresentimportant

opportunitiesforcommercialvehicleOEMs

TheseresultstellusthatthemajorityoftransportationcompaniestrustOEMsoverotherstoprovidethem

withasubscriptionmodel.Offeringsubscriptionscanthereforebeanexcellentstrategyformaximizingtrucksales.

Themodelpresentsarangeofadditionalopportunities,forexample:

•Offeringservicesthataremoreeasilypossible

withsubscriptionsbecausetheydependonthe

OEMowningthetruck.Examplesincludebattery

swapping,energygridservices,andtransportationasaservice.

•ReducingtheTCUfornewdrivetrains(seepanel),perhapsbyexploitingscalingeffectsnotaccessibletotheircustomers,includinglargerfleetsandgrid-relatedserviceslikeuploadingelectricityfromEVbatteries.

Reducingtotalcostofusefornewdrivetrains

PreliminaryresultsfromresearchconductedbyCapgeminiinFrancesuggestthatwithadigitalserviceecosystemforthetruckitis

alreadypossibletobringtheTCUforvehicleswithelectricdrivetrainsdownbelowthe

costofconventionalvehicleswithICE.ThisisachievedbyoffsettingthecostofproducinganEVwiththerevenuesfrom,forexample,energygridservices.ThisiseasiertodowiththesubscriptionmodelbecausetheOEM

canretainownershipofthevehicle.Itmightevenbeachievableifthecustomerownsthevehiclebutthebatteriesarecoveredbya

subscriptionservice.

•Providingsustainabilitybenefitsthathelpcustomersreachtheirtargets,e.g.byensuringthatcircularityprinciplesarefullyexploitedatend-of-lifefora

vehicleorbattery.

OEMsneedtodevelopsubscription-basedsolutionstomeetmarketexpectations

Ourfindingsdemonstratethatthereisamarketfor

rapidvehicleprovisionsolutions.Webelievethat

OEMsshouldalreadybeworkingontheirstrategies

forsatisfyingthismarketthroughsubscriptionmodels.Theymustinnovaterapidlytooffersolutionsthat

aretailoredtosatisfyemergingbusinessneedsandenvironmentalgoals.

Indoingso,theyshouldleveragewhatisknownaboutthemarkettoensurethattheirsolutionsarefitfor

purpose,andspecificallythatthey:

•Simultaneouslysupportbothsubscription-basedusageandelectrificationgoals.

•Addresscustomers’concernssuchascostandrange.

•Satisfyspecificdemandssuchasshortleadtimes(ideallylessthanaweek).

Solutionsmustbuildonresearchtoidentifyneedsandblockers

Companiesshouldmakefulluseofresearchdatato

explorethenuancesofcustomers’needsandblockers(e.g.thedifferencesbetweengroupsintermsof

attitudestoEVpriceversusrange,andthevarying

preferencesregardinghowenergyshouldbechargedfor).Thiswillhelpthemtooptimizetheirproductsandalsoimprovethewaytheyaremarketed.

Ofcourse,customers’preferencesandbeliefsarenotalwayssetinstone.Forexample,inthecaseofrangeanxiety,OEMscanhelptheircustomersunderstandthatwithtoday’srouteplanningtechnology,range

concernscaneasilybeovercome–andofcoursethatthevehiclesofferedwillexploitthistechnology.In

general,OEMsshouldaimtoinformthemarketabouttherealitiesoftoday’sEVs,includingbothadvantagesandchallenges,sincetheindicationsarethatthiswillcreategreateracceptance.

AnotherareawhereOEMsshouldeducatethemarketisincentivesforelectrification.Thisisacomplex

topic,becauseeveryregionandcountryhasitsown

arrangements.Francecurrentlyhastheworld’shighestCO2taxes,butGermanyhasalsointroducedaCO2

chargeinrelationtoautobahns,forinstance.And

theEUoffersa“payloadbonus”whichallowsEVsto

weighmorethanconventionaloneswithoutpenaltytocompensatefortheweightofthebattery(28%ofourrespondentswereunawareofthis).

Sustainabilityshouldbepartofthepackage

Asnoted,ifOEMsretainownershipofassets,itmaybeeasiertocreatecircularity,potentiallyhelpingbothOEMsandtheircustomerstofulfilltheirsustainabilitygoals.

Betterenergyuseisanotheropportunitythatariseswhenmanufacturersretainownershipoftrucksandbatteries.Theyshould,forexample,beabletoexploitfuturebatteries’capacityforbidirectionalcharging.Atruck’sbatterycouldstoreenergyfromsolarpanelsonitsroof.Whenthereisasurplus,consumersina

nearbybuildingcouldbesuppliedwithenergybya

stationarytruck,ortheenergycouldbefedbackintotheelectricitygrid.Inthisway,thevehiclecanactasamobileenergystore.

Manysustainabilitymeasureswillalsohave

commercialbenefits,sincetheyreducewasteandmakebetteruseofresources.

“Subscriptionmodelsoffera

practicalandattractivesolutiontotheprimarybarrierofhigh

upfrontcostsassociatedwithzero-emissionvehicles.By

spreadingoutthecostsand

providingcomprehensiveservices,thesemodelsmakeiteasierfor

truckingcompaniestoadoptgreenertechnologies,therebyacceleratingthetransitiontoamoresustainablefutureinthetransportationindustry.”

RenataObradovic

GroupClientPartnerCapgemini

16TheRiseofSubscriptionModels

HowCapgeminihelp

温馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
  • 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
  • 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
  • 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
  • 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

评论

0/150

提交评论