FDA产品质量风险评估原则翻译_第1页
FDA产品质量风险评估原则翻译_第2页
FDA产品质量风险评估原则翻译_第3页
FDA产品质量风险评估原则翻译_第4页
FDA产品质量风险评估原则翻译_第5页
已阅读5页,还剩44页未读 继续免费阅读

下载本文档

版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领

文档简介

1基于产品质量的风险评估原则H.GreggClaycamp,Ph.D.,CHPCenterforVeterinaryMedicineOfficeofNewAnimalDrugEvaluationhclaycam@June25,20032提纲总前提和问题风险分析的基本要素实施PQ的风险评估的可能阶段实施的风险分级模式?中试放大结论TheopinionsandideaspresentedherearethoseoftheauthoranddonotrepresentpolicyoropinionoftheFDA.Thismaterialisintendedfordiscussionpurposesonly.3前提:工艺中的风险和患者的风险的联系已丢失.风险

工艺检查风险cGMP风险

质量(患者)因素患者相互关系?模型?4目标:重新将cGMP(PQ)风险和对患者的实际风险联系起来风险

工艺检查中的风险

风险

质量(患者)因素cGMP患者5问题…CanRiskManagementtheory,tools,practiceandphilosophybeemployedtore-linkriskstothepatientwiththerisksidentified,perceivedorotherwiseimplicatedinproductqualityterms?风险管理理论,工具,实践和哲学Howcanweshareacommonlanguageaboutrisk,riskmanagement,andscience-baseddecisionmakingsothatwecanfocusondevelopingahigh-qualityriskmanagementmodelforproductquality?6GettingStarted…Whattheories,toolsandlessonslearnedinriskanalysiscanhelpaddressthesequestions?Giventheneedforasignificantshiftintheapproachtoriskmanagement,howdowebeginthechangeprocess?Arethereoff-the-shelfmodelsandtoolsthatmightbeused,i.e.,atapilot-scale?WhatkindsofRMprocessescanbeusedtofosterchangesneededboththeregulatoryandindustrialspheres?7基本风险分析8StartingwiththeSomeBasicsRiskisintuitiveandfamiliartoeveryone,yetfewamongusdefineriskcarefullyandformallyenoughforcomplexriskanalysis.exposureexposureseverityprobabilityharmhazardchanceseverityvalueprobabilitychance9风险=“暴露程度相对于

损失的机会”

(或者,风险=“chanceoflosingsomething

wevalue”)风险=危害x暴露程度风险后果=危害x暴露程度10同时期的风险分析

主要包括四大行动:

危害识别

风险评估

风险管理

风险交流11风险管评估先于风险管理Riskassessmentisnotasingleprocess,but“asystematicapproachtoorganizingandanalysingscientificknowledgeandinformation”tosupportariskdecision.NRC(1994)Variousparadigmsexistfortheexecutionofariskassessmentinpublichealth;however,allparadigmshaveincommonfundamentalscientificprinciples.12风险评估需要问以下问题:什么会出错?出错的可能性是什么?后果是什么?13风险管理需要问以下问题:可以做什么?那些方法是可用的?就风险、利益和成本而言什么是风险的交易物?目前的对将来的管理决定的影响是什么?14Roles/Tasks(--shortlist)Posetheriskquestion.ChargetheRiskAssessorswiththeRiskAssessmentTask.Convenestakeholders.Analyzedecisionoptions.Make/recommendthedecision.Identifydataandgatherinformationonthenature,extent,magnitudeanduncertaintyoftherisk.WritetheRiskAssessment.RecommendschangestoRMquestions.RiskManagersRiskAssessors15风险评估RegulatoryPolicy

RiskAssessment:(e.g.,BiotechnologyRAtodeterminetheneedforriskmanagementregulation.)AppliedRiskAssessment:Todeterminecompliancewitharegulationorpolicy.SafetyAssessments:Highlydefinedriskcalculations.Usuallyundera“brightline”safetypolicy.16Safetyvs.RiskRiskLimite.g.,Limitexceeded“10timesin100”SafetyLimit“Unsafe”“Safe”e.g.,Declared“unsafe”Estimatesofrisk17民主的风险分析风险评估为风险分析提供事实.风险风险风险风险风险风险风险风险评估风险风险风险风险风险风险风险Worst

18RiskAnalysisinaDemocracyTheriskmanagement

decisionsaboutwhichriskstomanagearevalue-ladendecisions.RiskManagementRiskRiskRiskRiskRiskRiskRiskRiskRiskRiskRiskRiskRiskRiskValuesCostsWorst

RiskManagementRank

19TranslatingRiskAnalyticParadigmsRiskAnalysisRiskAssessmentReleaseAssessmentExposureAssessmentConsequenceAssessmentRiskEstimationRiskManagementRiskCommunicationHazardIdentificationWhatcangowrong?Whataretheconsequences?Whatisthelikelihoodthatitwouldgowrong?Whatcanbedone?Whatarethetrade-offsintermsofcosts,benefitsandrisks?WhatistheimpactofdecisionsonfutureRMoptions?RiskAssessmentPQFailuresExposureAssessmentConsequenceAssessmentRiskEstimationAsimplechangetoapplyacontemporarymodel.20PossibleStagesofRiskAssessmentforWorkPlanning21HazardIdentificationWhatcangowrong?Identifyhazards:events

Identifyhazardousagents(chemical,biological,physical)Howseverearethepotentialconsequences?

Giventheeventoccurs,istheconsequencecatastrophic?Mildlyannoying?Howlikelyaretheeventstooccur?Essentiallyacruderiskestimateforinitialprioritizationpurposes.22ExposureAssessmentReleaseAssessment:

How“much”ofthehazardouseventoccurs?

Example:Doesa“non-sterile”eventinvolve1or10,000vials?Pathwayanalysis:Ifthehazardouseventoccurs,whatpathwaysaretherethatexposehumanstothehazard?Extentofexposure:Ifahazardouseventoccurs,howmanypeoplearepotentiallyexposed?23GMPFailure(Release)AssessmentHowfrequentaretheidentifiedPQevents(hazards)?Boundaryofrelease?Processline,plant,warehouse,distributor?Releaserates(“PQFaults”)areobtainedinfaulttreeassessments,empirically,historicaldata,expertanalyses.Example:FMEA24ConsequenceAssessment*Givenexposuretothehazardousevent/agent,whatisthelikelihoodofharmunderapre-definedendpoint?Endpointexamples:DeathIllnessWorryOAI*A.K.A.“Dose-ResponseAssessment”(seenextslide)25ConsequenceAssessmentQuantityofcontamination(“non-sterility”)i.e.,in“bacteriacountspervial”Proportionofexposedpersonswhobecomeill100%50%0%ED5026QualitativeConsequenceAssessmentHighMediumLowRelativeEffect/ImpactQuantitativerelationshipsknowninfewcasesLowMediumHigh(ExposureorDoseMetric)27RiskEstimationBringtogethertheinformationaboutthehazard,theextentofexposuretothehazard,theconsequencesofexposures,andthenestimatetherisk.Includesacriticalanalysisofuncertaintyinboththedataandriskassessmentmodels.28UncertaintiesinRiskAssessmentUNCERTAINTYKnowledgeVariabilityDataParametersModelTemporalSpatialInter-individual29ConceptualModelsforRMinPQInitiative30ThePQRiskManagementProblemDiversePQfailure(hazards)areidentified.Wide-rangingrisk(=chancethatexposuretothehazardwillresultinharm[adverseoutcome]).Wide-rangingconsequences(deathtoworry).Quantitativeriskanalysishazard-by-hazardtoovastanundertaking.Rankingofrisksforre-linkingworstPQriskswithworsthealthrisks,etc.Howcanweobjectivelyrank“applesandoranges”amongthe“potatoesandbeans?”31FromtheBeginning…Isriskanalysisforeachhazard–independently—feasible?32BulbFailsNoelectricityPowerPlantFailsPowerLineFailsGlassBrokenFilamentBrokenConnectorCorrodedVacuumLeakTreeBreaksLineWindBreaksLineImpuritiesVibrationsFaultTreesforeachprocess?33FaultsMagnifiedN-foldforaSimpleManufacturingProcess34DecisionAnalysesforEachHazardMultipliesComplexity!e.g.,35Solution?AMultifactorApproachtoPQRiskManagementMultifactormethodsalreadyexist.Sometools(software)alreadydeveloped.Appropriately-scaledapproachtothequestion,thedataquality,thenatureofthedecision,andtheunderstandingoftheoverallprocess.36StatetheAssumptionsE.g.,assumethathealthriskswerelinkedtoPQ“compliancerisks”previously,i.e.,thehistoricalbasisofregulation.

Historicallybasedassumption:

compliance

Healthrisk

qualityGiventheassumption,canGMP“compliancerisk”bemodeledasasurrogateofhealthrisk?37IdentifythePQFailures(Hazards)Whatcangowrong?

Toplevelorganizationofhazards:Health|Compliance|Resources|SociopoliticalSecondlevel(detail)organization:Sterility(microbialcontamination)Dose(formulation)Toxicity(chemicalcontamination)Physicalhazards(physicalcontamination/defect)Finedetail:“riskfactor”eventdescriptors.38SorttheHazards/RisksbyMajorCategoriesStartwithassumptions.Statequestionstobeanswered.Sortunderthequestions.Re-sortifnewpatternsemerge.Forexample,(nextslide)…39OrganizingaMulti-factorialRiskModel…40FocusedMulti-factorialRiskModelExamplehealthriskendpointsExamplecomplianceriskendpoints41Riskfactorsforagivenendpoint………42EstimatethePrevalenceTheprevalenceofinspectionfindingsforagiventypeofeventareinitialestimatesofprobabilitiesnecessaryforriskmanagementmodeling.Failureanalysis“inplant.”Failureincomplianceinspections.Humanadverseevents.43Foreachhazard…Health

EndpointProbabilityofOccurrenceVeryLowLowMediumHighVeryHighDeathMediumMediumHighHighHighChronicIllnessLowMediumMediumHighHighAcuteIllnessLowLowMediumMediumHighWorryLowLowLowMediumMedium44Themodeler’sview…(forexample)Health

EndpointProbabilityofOccurrenceVeryLowLowMediumHighVeryHighDeath54321ChronicIllness65432AcuteIllness76543Worry8765445Foreachhazard…Compliance

EndpointPriorHistoryofActionsNeverViolationsFewViol.AverageViol.SomeViol.ManyViol.OAIMediumMediumHighHighHighVAILowLowMediumHighHighOther?LowLowLowMediumHigh46Scoring,thenprioritizemultiplehazardsEndpointProbabilityofOccurrenceVeryLowLowMediumHighVeryHighDeathMediumMediumHighHighHighChronicIllnessLowMediumMediumHighHighAcuteIllnessLowLowMediumMediumHighWorryLowLowLowMediumMediumEndpointProbabilityofOccurrenceVeryLowLowMediumHighVeryHighDeathMediumMediumHighHighHighChronicIllnessLowMediumMediumHighHighAcuteIllnessLowLowMediumMediumHighWorryLowLowLowMediumMediumEndpointProbabilityofOccurrenceVeryLowLowMediumHighVeryHighDeathMediumMediumHighHighHighChronicIllnessLowMediumMediumHighHighAcuteIllnessLowLowMediumMediumHighWorryLowLowLowMediumMe

温馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
  • 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
  • 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
  • 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
  • 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

评论

0/150

提交评论