版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领
文档简介
1基于产品质量的风险评估原则H.GreggClaycamp,Ph.D.,CHPCenterforVeterinaryMedicineOfficeofNewAnimalDrugEvaluationhclaycam@June25,20032提纲总前提和问题风险分析的基本要素实施PQ的风险评估的可能阶段实施的风险分级模式?中试放大结论TheopinionsandideaspresentedherearethoseoftheauthoranddonotrepresentpolicyoropinionoftheFDA.Thismaterialisintendedfordiscussionpurposesonly.3前提:工艺中的风险和患者的风险的联系已丢失.风险
工艺检查风险cGMP风险
质量(患者)因素患者相互关系?模型?4目标:重新将cGMP(PQ)风险和对患者的实际风险联系起来风险
工艺检查中的风险
风险
质量(患者)因素cGMP患者5问题…CanRiskManagementtheory,tools,practiceandphilosophybeemployedtore-linkriskstothepatientwiththerisksidentified,perceivedorotherwiseimplicatedinproductqualityterms?风险管理理论,工具,实践和哲学Howcanweshareacommonlanguageaboutrisk,riskmanagement,andscience-baseddecisionmakingsothatwecanfocusondevelopingahigh-qualityriskmanagementmodelforproductquality?6GettingStarted…Whattheories,toolsandlessonslearnedinriskanalysiscanhelpaddressthesequestions?Giventheneedforasignificantshiftintheapproachtoriskmanagement,howdowebeginthechangeprocess?Arethereoff-the-shelfmodelsandtoolsthatmightbeused,i.e.,atapilot-scale?WhatkindsofRMprocessescanbeusedtofosterchangesneededboththeregulatoryandindustrialspheres?7基本风险分析8StartingwiththeSomeBasicsRiskisintuitiveandfamiliartoeveryone,yetfewamongusdefineriskcarefullyandformallyenoughforcomplexriskanalysis.exposureexposureseverityprobabilityharmhazardchanceseverityvalueprobabilitychance9风险=“暴露程度相对于
损失的机会”
(或者,风险=“chanceoflosingsomething
wevalue”)风险=危害x暴露程度风险后果=危害x暴露程度10同时期的风险分析
主要包括四大行动:
危害识别
风险评估
风险管理
风险交流11风险管评估先于风险管理Riskassessmentisnotasingleprocess,but“asystematicapproachtoorganizingandanalysingscientificknowledgeandinformation”tosupportariskdecision.NRC(1994)Variousparadigmsexistfortheexecutionofariskassessmentinpublichealth;however,allparadigmshaveincommonfundamentalscientificprinciples.12风险评估需要问以下问题:什么会出错?出错的可能性是什么?后果是什么?13风险管理需要问以下问题:可以做什么?那些方法是可用的?就风险、利益和成本而言什么是风险的交易物?目前的对将来的管理决定的影响是什么?14Roles/Tasks(--shortlist)Posetheriskquestion.ChargetheRiskAssessorswiththeRiskAssessmentTask.Convenestakeholders.Analyzedecisionoptions.Make/recommendthedecision.Identifydataandgatherinformationonthenature,extent,magnitudeanduncertaintyoftherisk.WritetheRiskAssessment.RecommendschangestoRMquestions.RiskManagersRiskAssessors15风险评估RegulatoryPolicy
RiskAssessment:(e.g.,BiotechnologyRAtodeterminetheneedforriskmanagementregulation.)AppliedRiskAssessment:Todeterminecompliancewitharegulationorpolicy.SafetyAssessments:Highlydefinedriskcalculations.Usuallyundera“brightline”safetypolicy.16Safetyvs.RiskRiskLimite.g.,Limitexceeded“10timesin100”SafetyLimit“Unsafe”“Safe”e.g.,Declared“unsafe”Estimatesofrisk17民主的风险分析风险评估为风险分析提供事实.风险风险风险风险风险风险风险风险评估风险风险风险风险风险风险风险Worst
18RiskAnalysisinaDemocracyTheriskmanagement
decisionsaboutwhichriskstomanagearevalue-ladendecisions.RiskManagementRiskRiskRiskRiskRiskRiskRiskRiskRiskRiskRiskRiskRiskRiskValuesCostsWorst
RiskManagementRank
19TranslatingRiskAnalyticParadigmsRiskAnalysisRiskAssessmentReleaseAssessmentExposureAssessmentConsequenceAssessmentRiskEstimationRiskManagementRiskCommunicationHazardIdentificationWhatcangowrong?Whataretheconsequences?Whatisthelikelihoodthatitwouldgowrong?Whatcanbedone?Whatarethetrade-offsintermsofcosts,benefitsandrisks?WhatistheimpactofdecisionsonfutureRMoptions?RiskAssessmentPQFailuresExposureAssessmentConsequenceAssessmentRiskEstimationAsimplechangetoapplyacontemporarymodel.20PossibleStagesofRiskAssessmentforWorkPlanning21HazardIdentificationWhatcangowrong?Identifyhazards:events
Identifyhazardousagents(chemical,biological,physical)Howseverearethepotentialconsequences?
Giventheeventoccurs,istheconsequencecatastrophic?Mildlyannoying?Howlikelyaretheeventstooccur?Essentiallyacruderiskestimateforinitialprioritizationpurposes.22ExposureAssessmentReleaseAssessment:
How“much”ofthehazardouseventoccurs?
Example:Doesa“non-sterile”eventinvolve1or10,000vials?Pathwayanalysis:Ifthehazardouseventoccurs,whatpathwaysaretherethatexposehumanstothehazard?Extentofexposure:Ifahazardouseventoccurs,howmanypeoplearepotentiallyexposed?23GMPFailure(Release)AssessmentHowfrequentaretheidentifiedPQevents(hazards)?Boundaryofrelease?Processline,plant,warehouse,distributor?Releaserates(“PQFaults”)areobtainedinfaulttreeassessments,empirically,historicaldata,expertanalyses.Example:FMEA24ConsequenceAssessment*Givenexposuretothehazardousevent/agent,whatisthelikelihoodofharmunderapre-definedendpoint?Endpointexamples:DeathIllnessWorryOAI*A.K.A.“Dose-ResponseAssessment”(seenextslide)25ConsequenceAssessmentQuantityofcontamination(“non-sterility”)i.e.,in“bacteriacountspervial”Proportionofexposedpersonswhobecomeill100%50%0%ED5026QualitativeConsequenceAssessmentHighMediumLowRelativeEffect/ImpactQuantitativerelationshipsknowninfewcasesLowMediumHigh(ExposureorDoseMetric)27RiskEstimationBringtogethertheinformationaboutthehazard,theextentofexposuretothehazard,theconsequencesofexposures,andthenestimatetherisk.Includesacriticalanalysisofuncertaintyinboththedataandriskassessmentmodels.28UncertaintiesinRiskAssessmentUNCERTAINTYKnowledgeVariabilityDataParametersModelTemporalSpatialInter-individual29ConceptualModelsforRMinPQInitiative30ThePQRiskManagementProblemDiversePQfailure(hazards)areidentified.Wide-rangingrisk(=chancethatexposuretothehazardwillresultinharm[adverseoutcome]).Wide-rangingconsequences(deathtoworry).Quantitativeriskanalysishazard-by-hazardtoovastanundertaking.Rankingofrisksforre-linkingworstPQriskswithworsthealthrisks,etc.Howcanweobjectivelyrank“applesandoranges”amongthe“potatoesandbeans?”31FromtheBeginning…Isriskanalysisforeachhazard–independently—feasible?32BulbFailsNoelectricityPowerPlantFailsPowerLineFailsGlassBrokenFilamentBrokenConnectorCorrodedVacuumLeakTreeBreaksLineWindBreaksLineImpuritiesVibrationsFaultTreesforeachprocess?33FaultsMagnifiedN-foldforaSimpleManufacturingProcess34DecisionAnalysesforEachHazardMultipliesComplexity!e.g.,35Solution?AMultifactorApproachtoPQRiskManagementMultifactormethodsalreadyexist.Sometools(software)alreadydeveloped.Appropriately-scaledapproachtothequestion,thedataquality,thenatureofthedecision,andtheunderstandingoftheoverallprocess.36StatetheAssumptionsE.g.,assumethathealthriskswerelinkedtoPQ“compliancerisks”previously,i.e.,thehistoricalbasisofregulation.
Historicallybasedassumption:
compliance
Healthrisk
qualityGiventheassumption,canGMP“compliancerisk”bemodeledasasurrogateofhealthrisk?37IdentifythePQFailures(Hazards)Whatcangowrong?
Toplevelorganizationofhazards:Health|Compliance|Resources|SociopoliticalSecondlevel(detail)organization:Sterility(microbialcontamination)Dose(formulation)Toxicity(chemicalcontamination)Physicalhazards(physicalcontamination/defect)Finedetail:“riskfactor”eventdescriptors.38SorttheHazards/RisksbyMajorCategoriesStartwithassumptions.Statequestionstobeanswered.Sortunderthequestions.Re-sortifnewpatternsemerge.Forexample,(nextslide)…39OrganizingaMulti-factorialRiskModel…40FocusedMulti-factorialRiskModelExamplehealthriskendpointsExamplecomplianceriskendpoints41Riskfactorsforagivenendpoint………42EstimatethePrevalenceTheprevalenceofinspectionfindingsforagiventypeofeventareinitialestimatesofprobabilitiesnecessaryforriskmanagementmodeling.Failureanalysis“inplant.”Failureincomplianceinspections.Humanadverseevents.43Foreachhazard…Health
EndpointProbabilityofOccurrenceVeryLowLowMediumHighVeryHighDeathMediumMediumHighHighHighChronicIllnessLowMediumMediumHighHighAcuteIllnessLowLowMediumMediumHighWorryLowLowLowMediumMedium44Themodeler’sview…(forexample)Health
EndpointProbabilityofOccurrenceVeryLowLowMediumHighVeryHighDeath54321ChronicIllness65432AcuteIllness76543Worry8765445Foreachhazard…Compliance
EndpointPriorHistoryofActionsNeverViolationsFewViol.AverageViol.SomeViol.ManyViol.OAIMediumMediumHighHighHighVAILowLowMediumHighHighOther?LowLowLowMediumHigh46Scoring,thenprioritizemultiplehazardsEndpointProbabilityofOccurrenceVeryLowLowMediumHighVeryHighDeathMediumMediumHighHighHighChronicIllnessLowMediumMediumHighHighAcuteIllnessLowLowMediumMediumHighWorryLowLowLowMediumMediumEndpointProbabilityofOccurrenceVeryLowLowMediumHighVeryHighDeathMediumMediumHighHighHighChronicIllnessLowMediumMediumHighHighAcuteIllnessLowLowMediumMediumHighWorryLowLowLowMediumMediumEndpointProbabilityofOccurrenceVeryLowLowMediumHighVeryHighDeathMediumMediumHighHighHighChronicIllnessLowMediumMediumHighHighAcuteIllnessLowLowMediumMediumHighWorryLowLowLowMediumMe
温馨提示
- 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
- 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
- 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
- 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
- 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
- 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。
最新文档
- 2024年度卫生间施工承包协议
- 2024年外汇贷款操作指南协议细则版
- 2024年小区物业管理与服务协议样本版B版
- 2024年二手车交易合作协议模板版
- 2024专项前期物业管理服务协议版
- 2024年厂房租赁权转移协议范本版
- 2024年国际贸易信用证融资担保合同版B版
- 2024年土方工程建设项目合作合同版B版
- 2024年度园林养护与施工综合协议样本版B版
- 2024年兼职人员法律责任豁免合同范本版B版
- 地籍管理修改
- 中国故事英文版哪吒英文二篇
- GB/T 19589-2004纳米氧化锌
- GA/T 1567-2019城市道路交通隔离栏设置指南
- 激发正能量共筑青春梦课件- 高中主题班会
- EIM Book 1 Unit 6 Eat for life 单元知识要点
- 部编版语文四年级上册书面分层作业设计案例25《王戎不取道旁李》(含答案)
- 防台防汛检查表
- CQC质量手册模本
- 危险性较大作业安全许可审批表
- 2022年版义务教育劳动课程标准解读
评论
0/150
提交评论