




版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领
文档简介
1基于产品质量的风险评估原则H.GreggClaycamp,Ph.D.,CHPCenterforVeterinaryMedicineOfficeofNewAnimalDrugEvaluationhclaycam@June25,20032提纲总前提和问题风险分析的基本要素实施PQ的风险评估的可能阶段实施的风险分级模式?中试放大结论TheopinionsandideaspresentedherearethoseoftheauthoranddonotrepresentpolicyoropinionoftheFDA.Thismaterialisintendedfordiscussionpurposesonly.3前提:工艺中的风险和患者的风险的联系已丢失.风险
工艺检查风险cGMP风险
质量(患者)因素患者相互关系?模型?4目标:重新将cGMP(PQ)风险和对患者的实际风险联系起来风险
工艺检查中的风险
风险
质量(患者)因素cGMP患者5问题…CanRiskManagementtheory,tools,practiceandphilosophybeemployedtore-linkriskstothepatientwiththerisksidentified,perceivedorotherwiseimplicatedinproductqualityterms?风险管理理论,工具,实践和哲学Howcanweshareacommonlanguageaboutrisk,riskmanagement,andscience-baseddecisionmakingsothatwecanfocusondevelopingahigh-qualityriskmanagementmodelforproductquality?6GettingStarted…Whattheories,toolsandlessonslearnedinriskanalysiscanhelpaddressthesequestions?Giventheneedforasignificantshiftintheapproachtoriskmanagement,howdowebeginthechangeprocess?Arethereoff-the-shelfmodelsandtoolsthatmightbeused,i.e.,atapilot-scale?WhatkindsofRMprocessescanbeusedtofosterchangesneededboththeregulatoryandindustrialspheres?7基本风险分析8StartingwiththeSomeBasicsRiskisintuitiveandfamiliartoeveryone,yetfewamongusdefineriskcarefullyandformallyenoughforcomplexriskanalysis.exposureexposureseverityprobabilityharmhazardchanceseverityvalueprobabilitychance9风险=“暴露程度相对于
损失的机会”
(或者,风险=“chanceoflosingsomething
wevalue”)风险=危害x暴露程度风险后果=危害x暴露程度10同时期的风险分析
主要包括四大行动:
危害识别
风险评估
风险管理
风险交流11风险管评估先于风险管理Riskassessmentisnotasingleprocess,but“asystematicapproachtoorganizingandanalysingscientificknowledgeandinformation”tosupportariskdecision.NRC(1994)Variousparadigmsexistfortheexecutionofariskassessmentinpublichealth;however,allparadigmshaveincommonfundamentalscientificprinciples.12风险评估需要问以下问题:什么会出错?出错的可能性是什么?后果是什么?13风险管理需要问以下问题:可以做什么?那些方法是可用的?就风险、利益和成本而言什么是风险的交易物?目前的对将来的管理决定的影响是什么?14Roles/Tasks(--shortlist)Posetheriskquestion.ChargetheRiskAssessorswiththeRiskAssessmentTask.Convenestakeholders.Analyzedecisionoptions.Make/recommendthedecision.Identifydataandgatherinformationonthenature,extent,magnitudeanduncertaintyoftherisk.WritetheRiskAssessment.RecommendschangestoRMquestions.RiskManagersRiskAssessors15风险评估RegulatoryPolicy
RiskAssessment:(e.g.,BiotechnologyRAtodeterminetheneedforriskmanagementregulation.)AppliedRiskAssessment:Todeterminecompliancewitharegulationorpolicy.SafetyAssessments:Highlydefinedriskcalculations.Usuallyundera“brightline”safetypolicy.16Safetyvs.RiskRiskLimite.g.,Limitexceeded“10timesin100”SafetyLimit“Unsafe”“Safe”e.g.,Declared“unsafe”Estimatesofrisk17民主的风险分析风险评估为风险分析提供事实.风险风险风险风险风险风险风险风险评估风险风险风险风险风险风险风险Worst
18RiskAnalysisinaDemocracyTheriskmanagement
decisionsaboutwhichriskstomanagearevalue-ladendecisions.RiskManagementRiskRiskRiskRiskRiskRiskRiskRiskRiskRiskRiskRiskRiskRiskValuesCostsWorst
RiskManagementRank
19TranslatingRiskAnalyticParadigmsRiskAnalysisRiskAssessmentReleaseAssessmentExposureAssessmentConsequenceAssessmentRiskEstimationRiskManagementRiskCommunicationHazardIdentificationWhatcangowrong?Whataretheconsequences?Whatisthelikelihoodthatitwouldgowrong?Whatcanbedone?Whatarethetrade-offsintermsofcosts,benefitsandrisks?WhatistheimpactofdecisionsonfutureRMoptions?RiskAssessmentPQFailuresExposureAssessmentConsequenceAssessmentRiskEstimationAsimplechangetoapplyacontemporarymodel.20PossibleStagesofRiskAssessmentforWorkPlanning21HazardIdentificationWhatcangowrong?Identifyhazards:events
Identifyhazardousagents(chemical,biological,physical)Howseverearethepotentialconsequences?
Giventheeventoccurs,istheconsequencecatastrophic?Mildlyannoying?Howlikelyaretheeventstooccur?Essentiallyacruderiskestimateforinitialprioritizationpurposes.22ExposureAssessmentReleaseAssessment:
How“much”ofthehazardouseventoccurs?
Example:Doesa“non-sterile”eventinvolve1or10,000vials?Pathwayanalysis:Ifthehazardouseventoccurs,whatpathwaysaretherethatexposehumanstothehazard?Extentofexposure:Ifahazardouseventoccurs,howmanypeoplearepotentiallyexposed?23GMPFailure(Release)AssessmentHowfrequentaretheidentifiedPQevents(hazards)?Boundaryofrelease?Processline,plant,warehouse,distributor?Releaserates(“PQFaults”)areobtainedinfaulttreeassessments,empirically,historicaldata,expertanalyses.Example:FMEA24ConsequenceAssessment*Givenexposuretothehazardousevent/agent,whatisthelikelihoodofharmunderapre-definedendpoint?Endpointexamples:DeathIllnessWorryOAI*A.K.A.“Dose-ResponseAssessment”(seenextslide)25ConsequenceAssessmentQuantityofcontamination(“non-sterility”)i.e.,in“bacteriacountspervial”Proportionofexposedpersonswhobecomeill100%50%0%ED5026QualitativeConsequenceAssessmentHighMediumLowRelativeEffect/ImpactQuantitativerelationshipsknowninfewcasesLowMediumHigh(ExposureorDoseMetric)27RiskEstimationBringtogethertheinformationaboutthehazard,theextentofexposuretothehazard,theconsequencesofexposures,andthenestimatetherisk.Includesacriticalanalysisofuncertaintyinboththedataandriskassessmentmodels.28UncertaintiesinRiskAssessmentUNCERTAINTYKnowledgeVariabilityDataParametersModelTemporalSpatialInter-individual29ConceptualModelsforRMinPQInitiative30ThePQRiskManagementProblemDiversePQfailure(hazards)areidentified.Wide-rangingrisk(=chancethatexposuretothehazardwillresultinharm[adverseoutcome]).Wide-rangingconsequences(deathtoworry).Quantitativeriskanalysishazard-by-hazardtoovastanundertaking.Rankingofrisksforre-linkingworstPQriskswithworsthealthrisks,etc.Howcanweobjectivelyrank“applesandoranges”amongthe“potatoesandbeans?”31FromtheBeginning…Isriskanalysisforeachhazard–independently—feasible?32BulbFailsNoelectricityPowerPlantFailsPowerLineFailsGlassBrokenFilamentBrokenConnectorCorrodedVacuumLeakTreeBreaksLineWindBreaksLineImpuritiesVibrationsFaultTreesforeachprocess?33FaultsMagnifiedN-foldforaSimpleManufacturingProcess34DecisionAnalysesforEachHazardMultipliesComplexity!e.g.,35Solution?AMultifactorApproachtoPQRiskManagementMultifactormethodsalreadyexist.Sometools(software)alreadydeveloped.Appropriately-scaledapproachtothequestion,thedataquality,thenatureofthedecision,andtheunderstandingoftheoverallprocess.36StatetheAssumptionsE.g.,assumethathealthriskswerelinkedtoPQ“compliancerisks”previously,i.e.,thehistoricalbasisofregulation.
Historicallybasedassumption:
compliance
Healthrisk
qualityGiventheassumption,canGMP“compliancerisk”bemodeledasasurrogateofhealthrisk?37IdentifythePQFailures(Hazards)Whatcangowrong?
Toplevelorganizationofhazards:Health|Compliance|Resources|SociopoliticalSecondlevel(detail)organization:Sterility(microbialcontamination)Dose(formulation)Toxicity(chemicalcontamination)Physicalhazards(physicalcontamination/defect)Finedetail:“riskfactor”eventdescriptors.38SorttheHazards/RisksbyMajorCategoriesStartwithassumptions.Statequestionstobeanswered.Sortunderthequestions.Re-sortifnewpatternsemerge.Forexample,(nextslide)…39OrganizingaMulti-factorialRiskModel…40FocusedMulti-factorialRiskModelExamplehealthriskendpointsExamplecomplianceriskendpoints41Riskfactorsforagivenendpoint………42EstimatethePrevalenceTheprevalenceofinspectionfindingsforagiventypeofeventareinitialestimatesofprobabilitiesnecessaryforriskmanagementmodeling.Failureanalysis“inplant.”Failureincomplianceinspections.Humanadverseevents.43Foreachhazard…Health
EndpointProbabilityofOccurrenceVeryLowLowMediumHighVeryHighDeathMediumMediumHighHighHighChronicIllnessLowMediumMediumHighHighAcuteIllnessLowLowMediumMediumHighWorryLowLowLowMediumMedium44Themodeler’sview…(forexample)Health
EndpointProbabilityofOccurrenceVeryLowLowMediumHighVeryHighDeath54321ChronicIllness65432AcuteIllness76543Worry8765445Foreachhazard…Compliance
EndpointPriorHistoryofActionsNeverViolationsFewViol.AverageViol.SomeViol.ManyViol.OAIMediumMediumHighHighHighVAILowLowMediumHighHighOther?LowLowLowMediumHigh46Scoring,thenprioritizemultiplehazardsEndpointProbabilityofOccurrenceVeryLowLowMediumHighVeryHighDeathMediumMediumHighHighHighChronicIllnessLowMediumMediumHighHighAcuteIllnessLowLowMediumMediumHighWorryLowLowLowMediumMediumEndpointProbabilityofOccurrenceVeryLowLowMediumHighVeryHighDeathMediumMediumHighHighHighChronicIllnessLowMediumMediumHighHighAcuteIllnessLowLowMediumMediumHighWorryLowLowLowMediumMediumEndpointProbabilityofOccurrenceVeryLowLowMediumHighVeryHighDeathMediumMediumHighHighHighChronicIllnessLowMediumMediumHighHighAcuteIllnessLowLowMediumMediumHighWorryLowLowLowMediumMe
温馨提示
- 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
- 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
- 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
- 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
- 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
- 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。
最新文档
- 2025年国际金融变革与机遇试题及答案
- 《长沙臭豆腐》少儿美术教育绘画课件创意教程教案
- 银行合规性维护方法试题及答案
- 2025银行从业资格证考试知识难点试题及答案
- 推动2025年国际金融理财师考试科学备考的策略试题及答案
- 2025年银行从业资格证考试协作学习试题及答案
- 2024年小语种证书考试的变革思考与试题及答案
- 2025年银行从业资格证考试规划试题及答案
- 网络编辑师行业动态研究试题及答案
- 2024年畜牧师职称好帮手试题及答案
- 2024年配网自动化运维工(技师)资格理论考试复习题库(含答案)
- T∕CACM 1333.4-2019 儿科系列常见病中药临床试验 设计与评价技术指南 第4部分:小儿腹泻
- 充电桩采购安装投标方案(技术方案)
- 动火作业安全检查表
- 电动牙刷替换头市场调研报告
- 化学合成反应中的选择性控制
- 第三单元+人民当家作主 整体教学设计 统编版道德与法治八年级下册
- 教科版小学科学六年级下册单元练习试题及答案(全册)
- 嘉峪关的壮丽长城之旅
- 中考英语阅读理解:图表类(附参考答案)
- 农作物病虫害防治服务投标方案(技术标)
评论
0/150
提交评论