(完整版)SCI修改稿回答审稿人意见范文模板大全

(完整版)SCI修改稿回答审稿人意见范文模板大全(完整版)SCI修改稿回答审稿人意见范文模板大全(完整版)SCI修改稿回答审稿人意见范文模板大全SCI修改稿回答审稿人意见范文模板大全修改稿回答审稿人的意见（最重要的部分）ListofResponsesDearEditorsandReviewers:Thankyouforyourletterandforthereviewers'commentsconcerningourmanuscriptentitled“PaperTitle”（ID：文章稿号).Thosecommentsareallvaluableandveryhelpfulforrevisingandimprovingourpaper，aswellastheimportantguidingsignificancetoourresearches。Wehavestudiedcommentscarefullyandhavemadecorrectionwhichwehopemeetwithapproval。Revisedportionaremarkedinredinthepaper。Themaincorrectionsinthepaperandtherespondstothereviewer’scommentsareasflowing：Respondstothereviewer’scomments:Reviewer＃1:1。Responsetocomment:(……简要列出意见……)Response:××××××2.Responsetocomment：（……简要列出意见……）Response:××××××。。。。..逐条意见回答，切忌一定不能有遗漏针对不同的问题有下列几个礼貌术语可适当用用：Weareverysorryforournegligenceof…….。。Weareverysorryforourincorrectwriting……。。.ItisreallytrueasReviewersuggestedthat……WehavemadecorrectionaccordingtotheReviewer’scomments.Wehavere—writtenthispartaccordingtotheReviewer’ssuggestionAsReviewersuggestedthat……ConsideringtheReviewer'ssuggestion，wehave……最后特意感谢一下这个审稿人的意见：Specialthankstoyouforyourgoodcomments。Reviewer＃2:同上述Reviewer#3:××××××Otherchanges：1。Line60-61,thestatementsof“……"werecorrectedas“…………"2。Line107,“……”wasadded3。Line129,“……”wasdeleted××××××Wetriedourbesttoimprovethemanuscriptandmadesomechangesinthemanuscript。Thesechangeswillnotinfluencethecontentandframeworkofthepaper.Andherewedidnotlistthechangesbutmarkedinredinrevisedpaper.WeappreciateforEditors/Reviewers’warmworkearnestly，andhopethatthecorrectionwillmeetwithapproval。Onceagain，thankyouverymuchforyourcommentsandsuggestions

以下是审稿人意见和本人的回复.与大家分享。从中可以看出，这位审稿人认真读了文章，提出很多宝贵的意见。这些意见分布在文章的各个地方.我很诧异有人真正读了我的文章.看到这些意见，我觉得很感激，不是因为接收文章的原因，而是这些意见能真正有助于提高文章的质量.从中还看出，回答审稿人问题的“技巧”。对于回答问题，有的人就是一味反驳，却不加改进.记得ACSStyleGuide里面说，当审稿人问到问题的,哪怕是他理解错误，这也说明作者这么写，其他读者也会理解错误，引起歧义。因此，作者就是要修改句子，使表达不引起歧义。因此：有时间一味反驳,还不如指出具体改进在第几页、第几段。============================================Reviewers'comments:Reviewer#3：Whilerevisingthescript,itistobesuggestedthatauthorshouldclearlyindicatetheaim&scopeofthestudyandwhilemakingconclusion,itistobementionedhowthestudyisusefulforthepracticalpurposes.Inadditionthefollowingarethefewsuggestions/comments，whichmaybeincludedwhilerevision.1。Introductionpartfirstparalastline,authormustavoidtowriteambiguousstatementi.e.，muchworkisstillahead，mayindicateproperly.2。Authorcouldnotdemonstratethereasonwhy，toselecttheorganiccompoundsuchasethylpyruvateforthisstudy?3。Experimentalpart：Itisdifficulttounderstandthein-situRAIRSexperimentswithhomemadeliquid—solidRAIRScell.Moredetailedinformationmaybeusefulfortheothersthosewhoareworkinginthearea.Photographoftheassembledcellmaybeincluded。4.Thedescriptiongivenfortheexperimentalsetup（page4）canbepresentedbyflowdiagraminstead，asaneasetounderstandthesetup。5.ReslutsPart（Page6)："COadlayerswithidenticalmonolayercoverages"，themonolayercoverage，isitbeenperformedwithsomeadsorptionmodel?Further,itwassuggestedthatCO-saturatedPtsurface,butnotmentionedaboutthesaturationexperiments.Isitobtainedafter60minofCObubbling？6.Page12,2ndpara：ThedisplacementofEtPybyCCl4flushing，isitconfirmedbytheEtPypeaks？Ifso，ithastobementionedclearlyinthepara.Alsointhesamepara，authorreferredforFig。7aand7bbutinthefigures,itdidn’tappear，onlyfigure7appeared.Ifeelitrefersforfigure7,portionAandB，tobecorrected.Similarly，inthetextreferredthefig2a，2b。etcbutonthefiguresheetitismentionedas2A，2B。etc。tobecorrected.7.Page14,1stpara:’contaminationofthePtsurfacebycorrosionofo—ringsinhighconcentrationEtPy’,butthestatementhasnotbeensupportedbyotherevidence/literature。8。Pages14through17:theobservedreactivityofvarioussolventsforadsorbedCOonthePtsurface(figs3&4）hastobediscussedmoreprecisely。Thisreviewerisunabletofollowthereasonwhytheyshoweddifferentreactivity，isitprincipallyduetotheorganicmoieties，orduetotheimpuritiesofcommerciallyavailablechemicalsoramixedeffect。Ithastobeclearlydemonstrated,however,theonlyexperimentperformedwithCO/water?CCl4woulddifficulttodescribeitindetail。9。Theauthortrytorestrainwithrepeatedargumentsinthetexte。g.,page3para1:Itwasgeneralizedthat。.。。..。..，alsoappearedonpage21firstpara.10.Captionsofthefiguresaretoolong,thedetaileddescriptionalreadygiveninthetext,hencewouldnotbeincludedhere.Captionsshouldbeshortandcrispy。===============================================DearEditor,Iquiteappreciateyourfavoriteconsiderationandthereviewer’sinsightfulcomments。NowIhaverevisedtheJCIS-06-247exactlyaccordingtothereviewer’scomments,andfoundthesecommentsareveryhelpful。Ihopethisrevisioncanmakemypapermoreacceptable.Therevisionswereaddressedpointbypointbelow.［general]TheobjectiveofthisresearchwasaddedatthebeginningofthethirdparagraphofIntroduction.HowthestudyisusefulforpracticalpurposeswasaddedattheendofConclusionasoneparagraph.[1]Ambiguousstatementi.e.,“muchworkisstillahead”wasdeleted.[2］Ethylpyruvatewasusedhereasatypicalcompound（containingtwocarbonylgroups)todemonstratethefeasibilityofusingourdiagnosingtooltodetectlow—coverageCO(comingfromdecarbonylationofEtPy)attheliquid-solidinterface.EtPyisareactantusedinliquid-phasechiralcatalysis,andslightdecompositionofEtPytoadsorbedCOwasreportedtoinfluencethecatalyticperformance.Inaddition,bystudyingthat，wecandirectlycompareourresultswithpreviousstudies.MoredetailsinthefirstparagraphofSection3.2。[3]TheIRcellwasdesignedaccordingtotheIRcellsusedbymanyelectrochemicalworkers.Referenceswereadded.AphotowasgivenintheSupportingInformation。[4]AflowdiagramoftheexperimentalsetupwasgiveninthenewFig.1。［5］TheCOadsorptionexperimentswereperformedinthesameadsorptionmode,bybubblingCOthroughacleanPtsurfaceindifferentdaystoachievethesamesaturationcoverageofCO.InitialexperimentsindicatedthatgiventheCObubblingratewas0.85cm3/min,COcansaturateonPtafter30—45min.WebubbleCOfor60mintoguaranteethesameCOcoverage。IfwebubbleCOformoretime，orifweincreasetheCOflowingrateseveraltimes，theCOsaturationcoveragedoesn’tchange，indicating60minisalreadyenough.AfigureshowingtheCOuptakeasafunctionofbubblingtimewasgivenintheSupportingInformation.［6］ThedisplacementofEtPybyCCl4wasconfirmedbytheremovingofEtPypeaks。ThementionofFig。7aand7betc。throughoutthetextwereallcorrected.［7]ItisknownthatsomesolventssuchasacetonecancorrodetheVitono-ring.Wesawthedamageofo—ringafterusinghigh—concentrationEtPy.AreferencetotheVitono-ringinformationwasgiven。[8]Theobservedreactivitytrendisduetoacombinationofbotheffects,withtheaccumulationoforganicmoietiesonPtsurfaceduringnumerousflushingcyclesthemoreimportantreason.Afewpropersentenceswereaddedtoclaritythispoint.[9]TherepeatedargumentsinthefirstparagraphinSection4.3weredeleted.［10］Thetoo—longcaptionsweresignificantlyshortened.Inall，I