GTA-G20贸易政策概况2023(英)_第1页
GTA-G20贸易政策概况2023(英)_第2页
GTA-G20贸易政策概况2023(英)_第3页
GTA-G20贸易政策概况2023(英)_第4页
GTA-G20贸易政策概况2023(英)_第5页
已阅读5页,还剩51页未读 继续免费阅读

下载本文档

版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领

文档简介

G20TradePolicyFactbook

2023Edition

TheindependentGlobalTradeAlertisapillaroftheSwiss-

based

St.GallenEndowmentforProsperityThroughTrade

September2023

Contents

ExecutiveSummary

3

WhybothertrackingthetradepoliciesofG20members?

4

RecentDevelopmentsinG20CommercialPolicy

Figure1:WhichG20membersadoptedtheworsttradepolicymixessincethe2022BaliSummit?Indonesia

implementedthemostdiscriminatorymix,Canadatheleast

5

Figure2:

TradereformsbyG20membersareup10%thisyear—tradedistortionsaredown2%.Butthelatterstilloutnumber

theformerbymorethan3-to-17

Figure3:

MarketAccessthreatstoG20economiesreverttothepre-COVIDpattern—subsidyawardstoimport-competing

firmsaccountforasmallerpercentagein2023thanin2020to20228

Figure4:SincetheBalisummit,fourtimesasmuchgoodstradewasatriskfromnewharmfulG20tradepolicies

thannewtradereforms

10

Figure5:Intra-G20commercialpolicydynamicssincetheBaliSummit:WhichG20membershaveharmedand

benefitedfellowG20membersthemostoftenandthemostintermsofgoodstrade?

11

Figure6:BeyondthenewEUsanctionsonRussiangoodsexports,

G20membersrarelysingleouteach

other’sexportsfortraderestrictions14

Figure7:DespiteGVCtradebeingafocusofIndia’sG20Presidency,sincetheBaliSummitlargesharesofintermediate

goodsimportsbytheG20werecoveredbynewmeasuresthatdiscouragedcross-bordersourcing

15

GeopoliticsandG20TradePolicymaking

Figure8:

Therevivalofindustrialpolicyfavouritism:Marketaccessatriskduetosubsidies,localisationandpublic

procurementmeasures17

Figure9:

Exportsatriskduetoexportcontrolsimposedsincethe2022BaliSummit18

Figure10:

HavefoodsecurityconcernsreallyinfluencedG20tradepolicydecisions?SincetheBaliSummit

whichG20membershavefacilitatedorimpededthecross-bordersourcingoffoodthemost?20

Figure11:

Commercialpolicyandthescrambleforcriticalminerals—theG20Presidentisthemostactive

liberaliseroftradepolicytowardscriticalminerals21

Figure12:Frenemies?SeveralG20memberstakecommercialpolicyactionsthatharmtheinterestsofsignatories

toregionaltradeagreements

22

Figure13:DodemocraciesorautocraciesposethegreaterthreattoG20exports?Doestheincidenceof

eachG20member’sharmfulcommercialpoliciesfallmoreondemocraciesoronautocracies?

23

TheContributionofG20TradePolicytoSustainableDevelopment

Figure14:

Environmentalgoodsmarketaccessatrisksincethe2022BaliSummit—theEUaccountsformostof

theincrease25

Figure15:

LowCarbonTechnologymarketaccessatrisksincethe2022BaliSummit—theEUaccountsfor

mostoftheincrease26

Figure16:IndiaprioritisedtradeandsustainabilityduringitsPresidency—ItturnsoutthatsincetheBaliSummit

lessthan40%ofG20trademeasureshadapositiveimpactontheSDGs

27

3

ExecutiveSummary

AnynotionthattheG20actsasaneffectiveforcetoalignitsmembers’tradeandindustrialpoliciescanbedis-carded.Onthebasisoftheirtrade,investment,industrial,andsubsidypolicychoicestakensincetheG20Lead-ers’SummitinBali,G20membershavelittleincommon.

ComparingthetradepolicymixesofG20membersintheIndonesianandIndianG20Presidenciessupportsthisconclusionandrevealsbigshiftsinpolicymix.AsFigure1shows,perhapsbecauseitwasunderscrutinyasG20Presidentlastyearandnotthisyear,Indonesiamovesfrombestinclasstoworstinclass.DuringtheIndianG20Presidency,ChinahadthefifthmostdiscriminatorytradepolicymixwhereasundertheIndonesianPresidencyitwasranked15th.Incontrast,duringthecurrentG20PresidencyCanada’stradepolicymixwasthemostliberalising.

ThisyeartheG20implemented10%moretradereforms,byfarthelargestproportionofwhichweretariffcuts(seeFigures2and3).G20tradedistortionsaredown2%thisyearandthepre-COVIDpatternofbeggar-thy-neigh-bourpolicieshasreturned—thatis,onemadeupofalargedoseofsubsidiestoimport-competingfirmscom-plementedbylimitsonforeignbiddingforstatecontractsandimporttariffincreases.SincetheBaliSummit,thetradepolicyreformstakenbytheG20coveredimportsworthUSD420billion—whereastheG20tradedistor-tionsthreatenedmorethanfourtimesasmuchgoodstrade,specifically,USD1850billion(seeFigure4).

SincetheBaliSummit,apartsanctionsagainstRussia,fewG20trademeasuressingleoutotherG20members.Havingsaidthat,UStrademeasuresthatharmonlyCanadacovered10%ofthelatter’sbilateralexportstotheUSA—morethantreblethecomparablepercentageforChina(3%).Meanwhile,EUpolicystepsthatharmonlyIndiaaffected5%oftheformer’simportsfromthelatterandEUmeasuresaffectingonlytheUKaffected4%ofbilateralexportsfromBritaintotheEU(seeFigure6).

InadditiontoanoverviewofG20tradepolicyactionssincetheBaliSummit,thisFactbookreportsoncertaingeopoliticalaspectsofG20tradepoliciesaswellasthedegreetowhichG20tradepolicychoicesarecontribut-ingtoSustainableDevelopment.Foreignmarketaccessatriskfromindustrialpolicymeasuresthatfavourlo-calfirmsispervasiveinChina,Russia,andtheUnitedStates(seeFigure7).Industrialpolicymeasuresthreatenforeignmarketaccessmostinmarketsforadvancedtechnologyproducts,dualusetechnologies,andlowcar-bontechnologiesinG20economies.

TheUnitedStatesstandsoutinitsresorttoexportcontrolsinsensitivesectors(seeFigure9).Japan,SouthKorea,andRussiaemployexportcontrolsinanumberofsuchsectorsbuttoalesserdegree.Meanwhile,nearly70%ofChineseexportsoflowcarbontechnologiesarecoveredbyBeijing’sexportcontrols.

Asfarasfoodinsecurityisconcerned,Brazil,IndiaandSouthKoreaaretheonlyG20memberswheretheirtradereformssincetheBaliSummitcovermoreoftheirfoodimportsthanmeasuresthatcrimpimports(seeFigure10).SinceG20Leaderslastmet,Argentina,Indonesia,andtheEuropeanUnionhavetakencommercialpolicystepsthatthreatenmorethanthree-quartersofthemarketaccesstotheiragriculturalmarkets.Suchstepsareinconsistentwithimprovingfoodsecurityfortheirpopulations.

Reducingtradebarriersfacilitatescross-bordersalesanddisseminationofenvironmentaltechnologiesandlowcarbontechnologies.SincethelastG20Leaders’Summit,onlythreeG20members(Australia,BrazilandTurkey)openedupmoretradeintheseproductsthanimpededforeignmarketaccess(seeFigures14and15).

TheIndianG20presidencylaidconsiderablestoreonpromotingSustainableDevelopment.Drawingonourpreviousworklinkingtrade,industrial,andsubsidypolicydevelopmentstosevenSustainableDevelopmentGoals(SDGs),wecalculatedtheshareofeachG20member’smeasurestakensincetheBaliSummitthatim-provedandimpairedSDGtargets.TheincoherencebetweenG20tradeanddevelopmentpolicyislaidbareinFigure16.Lessthan40%ofeachG20member’scommercialpolicyinterventionsimprovedSDGtargets,suchasenhancingtheirpopulation’saccesstofoodandmedicines.Morethan30%ofthemeasurestakenbyArgen-tina,Australia,Japan,andTurkeyshiftedmarketforcesinwaysthatmakeithardertoattainSDGtargets.Incontrast,39.1%ofthepolicymeasurestakenbyChinasincetheBaliSummitarelikelytohaveenhancedtheirperformanceontheSDGs.Thisisfurtherevidencethattradepolicymakersintheworld’slargesteconomieshaveyettotakefullyonboardtheAgenda2030goalsagreedattheUnitedNations.

4

WhybothertrackingthetradepoliciesofG20members?

TherationalefortheG20TradePolicyFactbook

2023Edition

AnotherG20Summitbeckons,thistimewithIndiaasPresident.Asaninstitutionalgrouping,theG20ishavingabadyear.Recently,someofitsmembersdecidedtoexpandacompetingforum(theexpandedBRICS).Earlierintheyear,manyoftheprinciplesforbankrescuescreatedinG20-inspiredforaaftertheGlobalFinancialCrisishavebeendiscardedindealingwithbankingcrisesonbothsidesoftheAtlantic.Mostrecently,theChinesegovernmenthasconfirmedthatforthefirsttimeitwillnotberepresentedbyitsHeadofStateattheG20Lead-ers’Summit.TotradepolicyhandstheG20longlostitsholdovercommercialpolicymaking.ResentedinGen-evabynon-G20membersforfailedattemptstosteertheworldtradingsystem,theG20’scredibilityontradepolicywasunderminedbyafailuretoadheretoitsownselectivecommitmenttoeschewprotectionismand,whenthatprovedtoomuch,theabandonmentofthatpledge.SowhybothertrackingthetradepoliciesofG20members?

TogetherG20membersrepresent86%ofglobalGDP,73%ofinternationaltrade,andtwo-thirdsoftheworld’spopulation.Theapproachesthesenationstakeinaddressingthegrandchallengesfacinghumankindmatter,evenwhenexecutedunilaterallyratherthaninacoordinatedmanner.TheG20countriesareresponsiblefor84.5%ofallthecommercialpolicyinterventiondocumentedbytheGlobalTradeAlertteam.Almostall(99%)oftheinformationwehavecollectedonG20tradepoliciescomesfromthewebsitesofgovernmentsandinter-nationalorganisations—orwheretruthfuldisclosurebyfirmsismandatedbylaw.

Inthiscontext,thesecondeditionofourG20TradePolicyFactbookrepresentstheGlobalTradeAlert‘scommit-menttoprovidecomprehensiveandevidence-basedinformationonsomeofthecurrentglobaltradetrends.Wecontinuetoidentifynewwaystonotonlydocumentpolicyinterventionsthataffectcross-bordercommerce,butalsotoconveythisinformationinanaccessiblemanner,therebyempoweringinterestedstakeholderswithinsightsofthemostrelevanttradepolicytrends.Wearecommittedtodemocratisingaccesstotradepolicyin-formationsothatmoreeffectivepoliciesareidentifiedthroughanalysis,ultimatelystrengtheningtheroleofinternationaltradeasanengineforhumandevelopmentinthedecadestocome.

TheGlobalTradeAlertisanindependenttradepolicymonitoringinitiativelocatedintheSt.GallenEndowmentforProsperitythroughTrade,anon-profitfoundationestablishedunderSwisslawandaspin-offfromtheUni-versityofSt.Gallen.Aftermakingoveradecadeofinvestmentsintradepolicyexpertiseanddigitaltools,theSt.GallenEndowmentforProsperityThroughTrade(SGEPT,hereafter)isinauniquepositiontoprovideinsightsonthesematters.Bycombiningpolicyexpertisewithevermorenovelwaystoacquire,enrich,andanalysein-formation,SGEPThasbecomeanimpartialandtrustworthysourceformanywhoseektoknowhowgovern-mentsacttoinfluenceglobalcommerce.Bynurturingapioneeringteamcapableofadaptingquicklytoourun-settledworld,weengagewithindividualsandorganisationsthatrespectourindependenceandshareourcoreobjectivesandvalues,whichincludeensuringthatthemillennium-oldhumanimperativetotraderemainsaforceforgoodassocietiestacklethepressingchallengesofthe21stcentury.

Acknowledgments

ThepreparationofthisFactbookinvolvedcontributionsfromeveryoperationalteamattheGlobalTradeAlert(Research,Monitoring,Outreach,andTechnology).FernandoMartín,AndréBrottoandSvenGlinzproposedandcreatedthechartsinthisFactbook.LawrenceReddywasinchargeofproducingtheFactbook.Prof.SimonJ.Evenett,aFounderoftheSt.GallenEndowmentforProsperityThroughTrade,providedideasandfeedbackduringtheexecutionofthisproject.

5

Figure1.WhichG20membersadoptedtheworsttradepolicymixes

sincethe2022BaliSummit?Indonesiaimplementedthemost

discriminatorymix,Canadatheleast

Rank

2023

Changeinrankcomparedtolast

G20Summit

+

+

+

+

-

-

+

+

-

+

+

-

-

-

-

+

7

-

0%20%40%60%80%100%

Percentageoftotaltradecoveredbyharmfulandliberalisingmeasures

Liberalisinginterventions

Harmfulinterventions

UnitedStates

SaudiArabia

SouthKorea

SouthAfrica

Argentina

Indonesia

Australia

Turkey

Canada

Japan

Mexico

Russia

EU-27

China

Brazil

India

47%

48%

47%

45%

23%

63%

55%

91%

90%

55%

53%

53%

52%

50%

50%

99%

99%

98%

98%

98%

96%

10%

17%

13

13

16

16

10

15

15

12

17

11

14

UK

%

%

%

%

%

4%

9%

3%

5%

7%

7%

4

2

2

2

2

6

6

6

6

8

3

3

3

3

9

9

5

5

5

7

1

1

1

4

2

2

2

8

3

1

1

RecentDevelopmentsinG20CommercialPolicy

6

HowwasFigure1prepared?

BetweentheBaliandNewDelhiG20Leaders’Summits,G20membersimplementedatotalof2,219unilat-eralpolicyinterventionsthataffectedcross-borderaccesstotheirnationalgoodsmarkets.Thisinventoryoftrade-relatedpolicyinterventionwasusedtoprepareFigure1.

ForeachG20member,weextractedinformationfromtheGTAdatabaseonthepolicyinterventionsaffect-inggoodstradethatwereimplementedsincethe2022BaliSummit.Wecalculatedthetotaldollarvalueofgoodstradeaffectedbytrade-distortingmeasures(denotethis$H)andbytradereforms(denotethis$L).Thenumberofdaysameasurewasinforceisusedtoweighteachmeasure’stradecoverage.Withthesedurationadjustedtradecoveragecalculations,foreachG20memberwethencalculatedthepercentage100H/(L+H).Thispercentagewasusedtoproducethecurrent(2023)rankingandrevealsthedegreetowhichcommercialpolicychangestowardsgoodstradesincetheBaliSummitwereskewedtowardspolicymeasuresthatharmthecommercialinterestsoftradingpartners.

Thatrankingwascomparedtoa2022rankingproducedinanidenticalmannerforthegoods-relatedpolicyinterventionscomingintoforcebetweentheRomeandBaliSummits.Byandlarge,the2023and2022rank-ingsofG20membersarequitestable.However,Canada,China,andIndonesiawitnesssignificantchangesintheirranking.

ThenumberintherightmostcolumninFigure1revealsthechangeinaG20member’srankingfrom2022to2023.Thatis,fromtherankingoftradepolicystancetakenbetweentheRomeandBaliG20Leaders’Sum-mitsandfromtherankingbasedonactionstakenbetweentheBalitotheNewDelhiG20Leaders’Summits.

Agreennumberindicatesamovetowardsarelativelymoreliberalisingcommercialpolicystancecomparedtopeers.Canadafell16ranksthisyeargoingfromtoptobottomoftheranking.Incontrast,ChinaandIndo-nesiamovedsharplyuptherankings,revealingmoretradedistortivepolicymixeswereadoptedbetweentheBaliandtheNewDelhiG20summits.ArgentinaandMexico’stradepoliciesbecamemarkedlymorere-strictiverelativetoG20peers.Incontrast,Australia,Japan,SouthKorea,andtheUKimplementedcommer-cialpolicymixesthatwererelativelymoreliberalisingsincetheBaliSummit.Suchfindingsindicateasignifi-cantdivergenceinunilateralpolicymakingacrosstheG20.Evidenceofpolicyalignmentthisisnot.

AnotherexplanationforsomeobservednationalrankingsisthatthespotlightontheG20Presidentmaycurbthetemptationtodiscriminateagainstforeignsuppliers—andthatrestraintisliftedoncetheG20Presi-dencypassestoanothercountry.Indonesia’sbigshiftintherankingsfrom2022to2023canbeseeninthislight.India’spositioninthe13thrankforthisyearmightbeseeninthislightaswell.

LikeallofthefiguresinthisFactbook,thisrankingwasproducedusingthefinestgraineddataoncross-bor-dergoodstradeavailable(fromtheUNCOMTRADEdatabaseatthesix-digitlevelofdisaggregation.)Un-fortunately,nosuchgranulardataoncross-borderservicesectortradeiscollectedbytheinternationalor-ganisations.Therefore,therankingpresentedinFigure1isbestthoughtofasacomparisonofchangesinpolicytreatmentofgoodstrade,whichisstillaverylargepartofobservedcross-bordercommerce.ThisrankingisbestthoughtofasacomparisonofthetradecoveredbythepolicymixofG20membersratherthanasameasureofthequantumofcommerceaffectedbypoliciesthatfavournationalfirms.

RecentDevelopmentsinG20CommercialPolicy

7

Figure2.TradereformsbyG20membersareup10%thisyear—tradedistortionsaredown2%.Butthelatterstilloutnumberthe formerbymorethan3-to-1

TotalnumberofG20interventionsimplementedeachyear

3028

27

33

15

42

12

12

52

26

6

83

1068

3

1

4

63

2

49

32

3

00

3

35

675

12

2018-20192020-2021202220232018-20192020-202120222023

Totalnumberofinterventionsrecordedby31Augusteachyear

HarmfulinterventionsLiberalisinginterventions

HowwasFigure2prepared?

Foreachyearfrom2018to2022thetotalnumberofpolicyinterventionsimplementedbyG20membersthatliberalisedanyformofcross-bordercommercewasextractedfromtheGTAdatabase.Likewise,thetotalnumberofpolicyinterventionsbyG20membersthatimpairedthecompetitivepositionoffirmslocatedabroad(referredtointheFigureas“harmful”interventions).

TheannualtotalscurrentlyrecordedintheGTAdatabasefromJanuarytoAugust2023arereportedtogeth-erwithtotalsrecordedby31Augustfromotherrecentyears.Asbenchmarks,averagesareprovidedfor2018and2019(pre-pandemic)andfor2020-2021(pandemic).Asmorepolicyinterventionarerecordedovertime,the31Augusttotals(indicatedbytheorangetriangle)arelessthanthetotalnumberofmeasureseverrecorded(indicatedbytheheightoftherespectivebar).Sincethisreportwascompiledusingdataavail-ableattheendofAugust2023,thedifferencebetweentheAugust312023totalandthoseatthestartofSeptember2023aretrivialandsothetriangleisnotreportedfor2023.

ThesignificanceoftheAugust31totalsisthattheyreporttheamountofG20policyinterventionthatwasrecordedoverthesametimeframeeachyear(thatis,duringthefirst8monthsofeachyear).Asaresult,theAugust31totalsprovideafairwaytocompareresorttoharmfulandliberalisingpoliciesbytheG20overthefiveyears,2018to2022.Inalltencolumns,onlyEUpolicyinterventionthataffectedextra-EUcommercewasincluded.

RecentDevelopmentsinG20CommercialPolicy

8

Figure3.MarketAccessthreatstoG20economiesreverttothepre-COVIDpattern—subsidyawardstoimport-competingfirmsaccountforasmallerpercentagein2023thanin2020to2022

MarketaccessimpairmentsimplementedbyG20members,2018-2023

Percent

100%

7.3%

75%

102%

8.6%

50%

797%

664%

25%

0%

2020-2021

Classof

Corporatesubsidies

GovernmentProcurement

Tariffincreases

Localisationmeasures

Importlicenses,quotasetc.Contingentmeasures

Others

Internaltaxesonimports

2022

intervention

74%

77%

4.4%4.8%

2018-2019

policy

644%

712%

82%

2023

RecentDevelopmentsinG20CommercialPolicy

9

HowwasFigure3prepared?

Fortheupperpanel,dataextractedfromtheGTAdatabaseonthenumberofeachtypeofmarketaccess-re-ducingpolicyinterventionimplementedbyG20membersfrom2018to2023.Theclassesofpolicyinterven-tionmostfrequentlyusedbyG20memberswereidentifiedanda100%stackedbarchartcreatedtorevealthemixofharmfulpolicyinterventionintroducedbyG20membersduringeachyearorpairofyears.Thepercentagesofharmfulinterventionassociatedwiththethreemostusedclassesofcommercialpolicy(awardofcorporatesubsidiestolocalfirms,governmentprocurementmeasures,andimporttariffmeas-ures)werereportedtofacilitatecomparisonsacrosstheyears.

Theextensiveresorttocorporatesubsidiesduringthefirstyearofthepandemicisevident.Governmentsandcompaniesreportsubsidyawardswithalag–sometimesasignificantlag–andthiswillhavecontribut-edtothelowerpercentageofcorporatesubsidiesrecordedsofarin2023.Still,eventhisyearmorethanhalfofG20policyinterventionthatthreatensmarketaccessisrelatedtocorporatesubsidiesawardedtoim-port-competingfirms.SincetheCOVID-pandemic,thereisanincreasingtrendinthenumberprotectionistmeasuresusinggovernmentprocurement,tariffincreasesandimportlicensesandquotas.

Weusethetermcorporatesubsidiesasnon-commercialsubsidies,suchastransfersbetweenlevelsofgov-ernment,welfarestatepaymentstoindividuals,andinternationalaidpayments,areexcludedfromtheGTAdatabaseanddonotcounttowardsanyofthetotalsreportedinthisFactbook.

ThelowerpanelisconstructedusingGTAdataontheaveragenumberofeachclassofmarketaccess-improv-ingmeasuresimplementedbytheG20during2018-2019and2020-2021andthetotalnumberofeachclassofaccess-improvingpolicyinterventionimplementedbyG20membersin2022and2023.Whatisnote-worthyinthelowerpanelistheliberalisingpolicymixisskewedmoreandmoretowardsimporttariffcuts.Clearly,forsomeG20governments,globalisationhasnotgonetoofar.

RecentDevelopmentsinG20CommercialPolicy

10

Figure4.SincetheBalisummit,fourtimesasmuchgoodstrade

wasatriskfromnewharmfulG20tradepoliciesthannewtradereforms

SinceBaliSummittradereformsbyG20memberscoveredUSD0.42trillionbuttradedistortionscoveredmuchmore,USD1.85trillion.

Exposuretotradedistortions&tradereformsin2023

(inbillionUSD)

1200

800

400

0

licensing,quotas

etc.

measures,including

1226

429

175

184

52

154

148

3

57

3021

07

4

Non-automatic

Importtariffs

Price-control

Trade-related

Governmentprocurement

Contingentmeasures

investmentmeasures

Subsidies(excl.

exportsubsidies)

taxes

HarmfulLiberalising

HowwasFigure4prepared?

WeextractedalltheinformationonG20commercialpolicyinterventionaffectingimportsofgoodsthatwereimplementedfromthe2022BaliSummittothe2023NewDelhiSummit.Wedistinguishedbetweenmeasuresthatreducemarketaccess(“harmfulinterventions”)fromthosethatimprovemarketaccess(“lib-eralisinginterventions”).Associatedwitheachofthesegoodstradeinterventionsarethesix-digitproduct(HS2012)codesimplicated.Adoptingstandardapproachesthatcorrectforthedurationthatameasureisinforce,wecalculatedthevalueoftheG20goodsimportsthatwillbecoveredbyeachclassofpolicyinter-ventionin2023.InthisfigureweorderedtheclassesofpolicyinterventionintermsofthedescendingtotalvalueofG20importsexposedtoharmfulintervention.G20measuresthataffectexports–suchasexporttaxes,quotas,bans,andsubsidies–donotcounttowardsthetotalsreportedhere.Dataon2019tradeflowsfromUNCOMTRADEwereusedinthisFigure--aswellasineveryotherfigureinthisFactbookwheretheval-uesoftradeflowscoveredarereported--toavoidthattheCOVID-19pandemicandsubsequentdisruptionofcross-bordersupplychainsfromskewingtheresults.

RecentDevelopmentsinG20CommercialPolicy

11

Figure5.Intra-G20commercialpolicydynamicssincetheBali

Summit:WhichG20membershaveharmedandbenefitedfellow

G20membersthemostoftenandthemostintermsofgoodstrade?

NumberofG20-on-G20harmfulcommercialpolicyinterventions

ImplementingJurisdiction

172

155

120

85

146

159

154

185

126

146

113

126

133

180

142

129

UnitedStates

UK

Turkey

SouthKorea

SouthAfrica

SaudiArabia

Russia

Mexico

Japan

Indonesia

India

EU-27

China

Canada

Brazil

Australia

Argentina

23

11

8

11

2

9

13

12

20

6

13

21

14

4

1

5

50

19

6

23

3

12

8

36

10

27

31

20

26

2

8

5

18

18

19

23

18

18

24

21

10

20

2

22

20

11

8

22

6

1

2

4

3

8

2

3

3

4

3

0

1

7

5

5

6

3

3

3

1

1

3

3

6

2

5

5

5

7

5

5

12

40

13

18

58

14

36

14

9

23

51

51

44

29

34

60

3

8

2

8

13

3

3

3

2

1

3

3

3

5

7

5

16

16

24

14

12

14

6

21

13

16

8

20

9

21

7

5

11

6

3

8

25

21

8

2

21

4

3

9

27

27

5

5

49

68

69

59

53

49

83

33

50

64

46

47

43

86

77

75

216

136

126

95

94

218

206

166

150

88

42

146

123

132

100

141

13

11

11

13

14

11

9

12

10

14

12

11

14

5

7

7

9

2

37

15

6

16

4

3

16

17

17

8

13

24

25

7

32

16

58

34

27

35

19

1

15

32

38

29

33

25

51

52

13

33

31

19

31

20

2

4

27

32

26

26

2

36

28

35

11

1

1

3

2

3

3

1

2

3

8

3

17

1

2

5

温馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
  • 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
  • 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
  • 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
  • 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

评论

0/150

提交评论