




版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领
文档简介
G20TradePolicyFactbook
2023Edition
TheindependentGlobalTradeAlertisapillaroftheSwiss-
based
St.GallenEndowmentforProsperityThroughTrade
September2023
Contents
ExecutiveSummary
3
WhybothertrackingthetradepoliciesofG20members?
4
RecentDevelopmentsinG20CommercialPolicy
Figure1:WhichG20membersadoptedtheworsttradepolicymixessincethe2022BaliSummit?Indonesia
implementedthemostdiscriminatorymix,Canadatheleast
5
Figure2:
TradereformsbyG20membersareup10%thisyear—tradedistortionsaredown2%.Butthelatterstilloutnumber
theformerbymorethan3-to-17
Figure3:
MarketAccessthreatstoG20economiesreverttothepre-COVIDpattern—subsidyawardstoimport-competing
firmsaccountforasmallerpercentagein2023thanin2020to20228
Figure4:SincetheBalisummit,fourtimesasmuchgoodstradewasatriskfromnewharmfulG20tradepolicies
thannewtradereforms
10
Figure5:Intra-G20commercialpolicydynamicssincetheBaliSummit:WhichG20membershaveharmedand
benefitedfellowG20membersthemostoftenandthemostintermsofgoodstrade?
11
Figure6:BeyondthenewEUsanctionsonRussiangoodsexports,
G20membersrarelysingleouteach
other’sexportsfortraderestrictions14
Figure7:DespiteGVCtradebeingafocusofIndia’sG20Presidency,sincetheBaliSummitlargesharesofintermediate
goodsimportsbytheG20werecoveredbynewmeasuresthatdiscouragedcross-bordersourcing
15
GeopoliticsandG20TradePolicymaking
Figure8:
Therevivalofindustrialpolicyfavouritism:Marketaccessatriskduetosubsidies,localisationandpublic
procurementmeasures17
Figure9:
Exportsatriskduetoexportcontrolsimposedsincethe2022BaliSummit18
Figure10:
HavefoodsecurityconcernsreallyinfluencedG20tradepolicydecisions?SincetheBaliSummit
whichG20membershavefacilitatedorimpededthecross-bordersourcingoffoodthemost?20
Figure11:
Commercialpolicyandthescrambleforcriticalminerals—theG20Presidentisthemostactive
liberaliseroftradepolicytowardscriticalminerals21
Figure12:Frenemies?SeveralG20memberstakecommercialpolicyactionsthatharmtheinterestsofsignatories
toregionaltradeagreements
22
Figure13:DodemocraciesorautocraciesposethegreaterthreattoG20exports?Doestheincidenceof
eachG20member’sharmfulcommercialpoliciesfallmoreondemocraciesoronautocracies?
23
TheContributionofG20TradePolicytoSustainableDevelopment
Figure14:
Environmentalgoodsmarketaccessatrisksincethe2022BaliSummit—theEUaccountsformostof
theincrease25
Figure15:
LowCarbonTechnologymarketaccessatrisksincethe2022BaliSummit—theEUaccountsfor
mostoftheincrease26
Figure16:IndiaprioritisedtradeandsustainabilityduringitsPresidency—ItturnsoutthatsincetheBaliSummit
lessthan40%ofG20trademeasureshadapositiveimpactontheSDGs
27
3
ExecutiveSummary
AnynotionthattheG20actsasaneffectiveforcetoalignitsmembers’tradeandindustrialpoliciescanbedis-carded.Onthebasisoftheirtrade,investment,industrial,andsubsidypolicychoicestakensincetheG20Lead-ers’SummitinBali,G20membershavelittleincommon.
ComparingthetradepolicymixesofG20membersintheIndonesianandIndianG20Presidenciessupportsthisconclusionandrevealsbigshiftsinpolicymix.AsFigure1shows,perhapsbecauseitwasunderscrutinyasG20Presidentlastyearandnotthisyear,Indonesiamovesfrombestinclasstoworstinclass.DuringtheIndianG20Presidency,ChinahadthefifthmostdiscriminatorytradepolicymixwhereasundertheIndonesianPresidencyitwasranked15th.Incontrast,duringthecurrentG20PresidencyCanada’stradepolicymixwasthemostliberalising.
ThisyeartheG20implemented10%moretradereforms,byfarthelargestproportionofwhichweretariffcuts(seeFigures2and3).G20tradedistortionsaredown2%thisyearandthepre-COVIDpatternofbeggar-thy-neigh-bourpolicieshasreturned—thatis,onemadeupofalargedoseofsubsidiestoimport-competingfirmscom-plementedbylimitsonforeignbiddingforstatecontractsandimporttariffincreases.SincetheBaliSummit,thetradepolicyreformstakenbytheG20coveredimportsworthUSD420billion—whereastheG20tradedistor-tionsthreatenedmorethanfourtimesasmuchgoodstrade,specifically,USD1850billion(seeFigure4).
SincetheBaliSummit,apartsanctionsagainstRussia,fewG20trademeasuressingleoutotherG20members.Havingsaidthat,UStrademeasuresthatharmonlyCanadacovered10%ofthelatter’sbilateralexportstotheUSA—morethantreblethecomparablepercentageforChina(3%).Meanwhile,EUpolicystepsthatharmonlyIndiaaffected5%oftheformer’simportsfromthelatterandEUmeasuresaffectingonlytheUKaffected4%ofbilateralexportsfromBritaintotheEU(seeFigure6).
InadditiontoanoverviewofG20tradepolicyactionssincetheBaliSummit,thisFactbookreportsoncertaingeopoliticalaspectsofG20tradepoliciesaswellasthedegreetowhichG20tradepolicychoicesarecontribut-ingtoSustainableDevelopment.Foreignmarketaccessatriskfromindustrialpolicymeasuresthatfavourlo-calfirmsispervasiveinChina,Russia,andtheUnitedStates(seeFigure7).Industrialpolicymeasuresthreatenforeignmarketaccessmostinmarketsforadvancedtechnologyproducts,dualusetechnologies,andlowcar-bontechnologiesinG20economies.
TheUnitedStatesstandsoutinitsresorttoexportcontrolsinsensitivesectors(seeFigure9).Japan,SouthKorea,andRussiaemployexportcontrolsinanumberofsuchsectorsbuttoalesserdegree.Meanwhile,nearly70%ofChineseexportsoflowcarbontechnologiesarecoveredbyBeijing’sexportcontrols.
Asfarasfoodinsecurityisconcerned,Brazil,IndiaandSouthKoreaaretheonlyG20memberswheretheirtradereformssincetheBaliSummitcovermoreoftheirfoodimportsthanmeasuresthatcrimpimports(seeFigure10).SinceG20Leaderslastmet,Argentina,Indonesia,andtheEuropeanUnionhavetakencommercialpolicystepsthatthreatenmorethanthree-quartersofthemarketaccesstotheiragriculturalmarkets.Suchstepsareinconsistentwithimprovingfoodsecurityfortheirpopulations.
Reducingtradebarriersfacilitatescross-bordersalesanddisseminationofenvironmentaltechnologiesandlowcarbontechnologies.SincethelastG20Leaders’Summit,onlythreeG20members(Australia,BrazilandTurkey)openedupmoretradeintheseproductsthanimpededforeignmarketaccess(seeFigures14and15).
TheIndianG20presidencylaidconsiderablestoreonpromotingSustainableDevelopment.Drawingonourpreviousworklinkingtrade,industrial,andsubsidypolicydevelopmentstosevenSustainableDevelopmentGoals(SDGs),wecalculatedtheshareofeachG20member’smeasurestakensincetheBaliSummitthatim-provedandimpairedSDGtargets.TheincoherencebetweenG20tradeanddevelopmentpolicyislaidbareinFigure16.Lessthan40%ofeachG20member’scommercialpolicyinterventionsimprovedSDGtargets,suchasenhancingtheirpopulation’saccesstofoodandmedicines.Morethan30%ofthemeasurestakenbyArgen-tina,Australia,Japan,andTurkeyshiftedmarketforcesinwaysthatmakeithardertoattainSDGtargets.Incontrast,39.1%ofthepolicymeasurestakenbyChinasincetheBaliSummitarelikelytohaveenhancedtheirperformanceontheSDGs.Thisisfurtherevidencethattradepolicymakersintheworld’slargesteconomieshaveyettotakefullyonboardtheAgenda2030goalsagreedattheUnitedNations.
4
WhybothertrackingthetradepoliciesofG20members?
TherationalefortheG20TradePolicyFactbook
2023Edition
AnotherG20Summitbeckons,thistimewithIndiaasPresident.Asaninstitutionalgrouping,theG20ishavingabadyear.Recently,someofitsmembersdecidedtoexpandacompetingforum(theexpandedBRICS).Earlierintheyear,manyoftheprinciplesforbankrescuescreatedinG20-inspiredforaaftertheGlobalFinancialCrisishavebeendiscardedindealingwithbankingcrisesonbothsidesoftheAtlantic.Mostrecently,theChinesegovernmenthasconfirmedthatforthefirsttimeitwillnotberepresentedbyitsHeadofStateattheG20Lead-ers’Summit.TotradepolicyhandstheG20longlostitsholdovercommercialpolicymaking.ResentedinGen-evabynon-G20membersforfailedattemptstosteertheworldtradingsystem,theG20’scredibilityontradepolicywasunderminedbyafailuretoadheretoitsownselectivecommitmenttoeschewprotectionismand,whenthatprovedtoomuch,theabandonmentofthatpledge.SowhybothertrackingthetradepoliciesofG20members?
TogetherG20membersrepresent86%ofglobalGDP,73%ofinternationaltrade,andtwo-thirdsoftheworld’spopulation.Theapproachesthesenationstakeinaddressingthegrandchallengesfacinghumankindmatter,evenwhenexecutedunilaterallyratherthaninacoordinatedmanner.TheG20countriesareresponsiblefor84.5%ofallthecommercialpolicyinterventiondocumentedbytheGlobalTradeAlertteam.Almostall(99%)oftheinformationwehavecollectedonG20tradepoliciescomesfromthewebsitesofgovernmentsandinter-nationalorganisations—orwheretruthfuldisclosurebyfirmsismandatedbylaw.
Inthiscontext,thesecondeditionofourG20TradePolicyFactbookrepresentstheGlobalTradeAlert‘scommit-menttoprovidecomprehensiveandevidence-basedinformationonsomeofthecurrentglobaltradetrends.Wecontinuetoidentifynewwaystonotonlydocumentpolicyinterventionsthataffectcross-bordercommerce,butalsotoconveythisinformationinanaccessiblemanner,therebyempoweringinterestedstakeholderswithinsightsofthemostrelevanttradepolicytrends.Wearecommittedtodemocratisingaccesstotradepolicyin-formationsothatmoreeffectivepoliciesareidentifiedthroughanalysis,ultimatelystrengtheningtheroleofinternationaltradeasanengineforhumandevelopmentinthedecadestocome.
TheGlobalTradeAlertisanindependenttradepolicymonitoringinitiativelocatedintheSt.GallenEndowmentforProsperitythroughTrade,anon-profitfoundationestablishedunderSwisslawandaspin-offfromtheUni-versityofSt.Gallen.Aftermakingoveradecadeofinvestmentsintradepolicyexpertiseanddigitaltools,theSt.GallenEndowmentforProsperityThroughTrade(SGEPT,hereafter)isinauniquepositiontoprovideinsightsonthesematters.Bycombiningpolicyexpertisewithevermorenovelwaystoacquire,enrich,andanalysein-formation,SGEPThasbecomeanimpartialandtrustworthysourceformanywhoseektoknowhowgovern-mentsacttoinfluenceglobalcommerce.Bynurturingapioneeringteamcapableofadaptingquicklytoourun-settledworld,weengagewithindividualsandorganisationsthatrespectourindependenceandshareourcoreobjectivesandvalues,whichincludeensuringthatthemillennium-oldhumanimperativetotraderemainsaforceforgoodassocietiestacklethepressingchallengesofthe21stcentury.
Acknowledgments
ThepreparationofthisFactbookinvolvedcontributionsfromeveryoperationalteamattheGlobalTradeAlert(Research,Monitoring,Outreach,andTechnology).FernandoMartín,AndréBrottoandSvenGlinzproposedandcreatedthechartsinthisFactbook.LawrenceReddywasinchargeofproducingtheFactbook.Prof.SimonJ.Evenett,aFounderoftheSt.GallenEndowmentforProsperityThroughTrade,providedideasandfeedbackduringtheexecutionofthisproject.
5
Figure1.WhichG20membersadoptedtheworsttradepolicymixes
sincethe2022BaliSummit?Indonesiaimplementedthemost
discriminatorymix,Canadatheleast
Rank
2023
Changeinrankcomparedtolast
G20Summit
+
+
+
+
-
-
+
+
-
+
+
-
-
-
-
+
7
-
0%20%40%60%80%100%
Percentageoftotaltradecoveredbyharmfulandliberalisingmeasures
Liberalisinginterventions
Harmfulinterventions
UnitedStates
SaudiArabia
SouthKorea
SouthAfrica
Argentina
Indonesia
Australia
Turkey
Canada
Japan
Mexico
Russia
EU-27
China
Brazil
India
47%
48%
47%
45%
23%
63%
55%
91%
90%
55%
53%
53%
52%
50%
50%
99%
99%
98%
98%
98%
96%
10%
17%
13
13
16
16
10
15
15
12
17
11
14
UK
%
%
%
%
%
4%
9%
3%
5%
7%
7%
4
2
2
2
2
6
6
6
6
8
3
3
3
3
9
9
5
5
5
7
1
1
1
4
2
2
2
8
3
1
1
RecentDevelopmentsinG20CommercialPolicy
6
HowwasFigure1prepared?
BetweentheBaliandNewDelhiG20Leaders’Summits,G20membersimplementedatotalof2,219unilat-eralpolicyinterventionsthataffectedcross-borderaccesstotheirnationalgoodsmarkets.Thisinventoryoftrade-relatedpolicyinterventionwasusedtoprepareFigure1.
ForeachG20member,weextractedinformationfromtheGTAdatabaseonthepolicyinterventionsaffect-inggoodstradethatwereimplementedsincethe2022BaliSummit.Wecalculatedthetotaldollarvalueofgoodstradeaffectedbytrade-distortingmeasures(denotethis$H)andbytradereforms(denotethis$L).Thenumberofdaysameasurewasinforceisusedtoweighteachmeasure’stradecoverage.Withthesedurationadjustedtradecoveragecalculations,foreachG20memberwethencalculatedthepercentage100H/(L+H).Thispercentagewasusedtoproducethecurrent(2023)rankingandrevealsthedegreetowhichcommercialpolicychangestowardsgoodstradesincetheBaliSummitwereskewedtowardspolicymeasuresthatharmthecommercialinterestsoftradingpartners.
Thatrankingwascomparedtoa2022rankingproducedinanidenticalmannerforthegoods-relatedpolicyinterventionscomingintoforcebetweentheRomeandBaliSummits.Byandlarge,the2023and2022rank-ingsofG20membersarequitestable.However,Canada,China,andIndonesiawitnesssignificantchangesintheirranking.
ThenumberintherightmostcolumninFigure1revealsthechangeinaG20member’srankingfrom2022to2023.Thatis,fromtherankingoftradepolicystancetakenbetweentheRomeandBaliG20Leaders’Sum-mitsandfromtherankingbasedonactionstakenbetweentheBalitotheNewDelhiG20Leaders’Summits.
Agreennumberindicatesamovetowardsarelativelymoreliberalisingcommercialpolicystancecomparedtopeers.Canadafell16ranksthisyeargoingfromtoptobottomoftheranking.Incontrast,ChinaandIndo-nesiamovedsharplyuptherankings,revealingmoretradedistortivepolicymixeswereadoptedbetweentheBaliandtheNewDelhiG20summits.ArgentinaandMexico’stradepoliciesbecamemarkedlymorere-strictiverelativetoG20peers.Incontrast,Australia,Japan,SouthKorea,andtheUKimplementedcommer-cialpolicymixesthatwererelativelymoreliberalisingsincetheBaliSummit.Suchfindingsindicateasignifi-cantdivergenceinunilateralpolicymakingacrosstheG20.Evidenceofpolicyalignmentthisisnot.
AnotherexplanationforsomeobservednationalrankingsisthatthespotlightontheG20Presidentmaycurbthetemptationtodiscriminateagainstforeignsuppliers—andthatrestraintisliftedoncetheG20Presi-dencypassestoanothercountry.Indonesia’sbigshiftintherankingsfrom2022to2023canbeseeninthislight.India’spositioninthe13thrankforthisyearmightbeseeninthislightaswell.
LikeallofthefiguresinthisFactbook,thisrankingwasproducedusingthefinestgraineddataoncross-bor-dergoodstradeavailable(fromtheUNCOMTRADEdatabaseatthesix-digitlevelofdisaggregation.)Un-fortunately,nosuchgranulardataoncross-borderservicesectortradeiscollectedbytheinternationalor-ganisations.Therefore,therankingpresentedinFigure1isbestthoughtofasacomparisonofchangesinpolicytreatmentofgoodstrade,whichisstillaverylargepartofobservedcross-bordercommerce.ThisrankingisbestthoughtofasacomparisonofthetradecoveredbythepolicymixofG20membersratherthanasameasureofthequantumofcommerceaffectedbypoliciesthatfavournationalfirms.
RecentDevelopmentsinG20CommercialPolicy
7
Figure2.TradereformsbyG20membersareup10%thisyear—tradedistortionsaredown2%.Butthelatterstilloutnumberthe formerbymorethan3-to-1
TotalnumberofG20interventionsimplementedeachyear
3028
27
33
15
42
12
12
52
26
6
83
1068
3
1
4
63
2
49
32
3
00
3
35
675
12
2018-20192020-2021202220232018-20192020-202120222023
Totalnumberofinterventionsrecordedby31Augusteachyear
HarmfulinterventionsLiberalisinginterventions
HowwasFigure2prepared?
Foreachyearfrom2018to2022thetotalnumberofpolicyinterventionsimplementedbyG20membersthatliberalisedanyformofcross-bordercommercewasextractedfromtheGTAdatabase.Likewise,thetotalnumberofpolicyinterventionsbyG20membersthatimpairedthecompetitivepositionoffirmslocatedabroad(referredtointheFigureas“harmful”interventions).
TheannualtotalscurrentlyrecordedintheGTAdatabasefromJanuarytoAugust2023arereportedtogeth-erwithtotalsrecordedby31Augustfromotherrecentyears.Asbenchmarks,averagesareprovidedfor2018and2019(pre-pandemic)andfor2020-2021(pandemic).Asmorepolicyinterventionarerecordedovertime,the31Augusttotals(indicatedbytheorangetriangle)arelessthanthetotalnumberofmeasureseverrecorded(indicatedbytheheightoftherespectivebar).Sincethisreportwascompiledusingdataavail-ableattheendofAugust2023,thedifferencebetweentheAugust312023totalandthoseatthestartofSeptember2023aretrivialandsothetriangleisnotreportedfor2023.
ThesignificanceoftheAugust31totalsisthattheyreporttheamountofG20policyinterventionthatwasrecordedoverthesametimeframeeachyear(thatis,duringthefirst8monthsofeachyear).Asaresult,theAugust31totalsprovideafairwaytocompareresorttoharmfulandliberalisingpoliciesbytheG20overthefiveyears,2018to2022.Inalltencolumns,onlyEUpolicyinterventionthataffectedextra-EUcommercewasincluded.
RecentDevelopmentsinG20CommercialPolicy
8
Figure3.MarketAccessthreatstoG20economiesreverttothepre-COVIDpattern—subsidyawardstoimport-competingfirmsaccountforasmallerpercentagein2023thanin2020to2022
MarketaccessimpairmentsimplementedbyG20members,2018-2023
Percent
100%
7.3%
75%
102%
8.6%
50%
797%
664%
25%
0%
2020-2021
Classof
Corporatesubsidies
GovernmentProcurement
Tariffincreases
Localisationmeasures
Importlicenses,quotasetc.Contingentmeasures
Others
Internaltaxesonimports
2022
intervention
74%
77%
4.4%4.8%
2018-2019
policy
644%
712%
82%
2023
RecentDevelopmentsinG20CommercialPolicy
9
HowwasFigure3prepared?
Fortheupperpanel,dataextractedfromtheGTAdatabaseonthenumberofeachtypeofmarketaccess-re-ducingpolicyinterventionimplementedbyG20membersfrom2018to2023.Theclassesofpolicyinterven-tionmostfrequentlyusedbyG20memberswereidentifiedanda100%stackedbarchartcreatedtorevealthemixofharmfulpolicyinterventionintroducedbyG20membersduringeachyearorpairofyears.Thepercentagesofharmfulinterventionassociatedwiththethreemostusedclassesofcommercialpolicy(awardofcorporatesubsidiestolocalfirms,governmentprocurementmeasures,andimporttariffmeas-ures)werereportedtofacilitatecomparisonsacrosstheyears.
Theextensiveresorttocorporatesubsidiesduringthefirstyearofthepandemicisevident.Governmentsandcompaniesreportsubsidyawardswithalag–sometimesasignificantlag–andthiswillhavecontribut-edtothelowerpercentageofcorporatesubsidiesrecordedsofarin2023.Still,eventhisyearmorethanhalfofG20policyinterventionthatthreatensmarketaccessisrelatedtocorporatesubsidiesawardedtoim-port-competingfirms.SincetheCOVID-pandemic,thereisanincreasingtrendinthenumberprotectionistmeasuresusinggovernmentprocurement,tariffincreasesandimportlicensesandquotas.
Weusethetermcorporatesubsidiesasnon-commercialsubsidies,suchastransfersbetweenlevelsofgov-ernment,welfarestatepaymentstoindividuals,andinternationalaidpayments,areexcludedfromtheGTAdatabaseanddonotcounttowardsanyofthetotalsreportedinthisFactbook.
ThelowerpanelisconstructedusingGTAdataontheaveragenumberofeachclassofmarketaccess-improv-ingmeasuresimplementedbytheG20during2018-2019and2020-2021andthetotalnumberofeachclassofaccess-improvingpolicyinterventionimplementedbyG20membersin2022and2023.Whatisnote-worthyinthelowerpanelistheliberalisingpolicymixisskewedmoreandmoretowardsimporttariffcuts.Clearly,forsomeG20governments,globalisationhasnotgonetoofar.
RecentDevelopmentsinG20CommercialPolicy
10
Figure4.SincetheBalisummit,fourtimesasmuchgoodstrade
wasatriskfromnewharmfulG20tradepoliciesthannewtradereforms
SinceBaliSummittradereformsbyG20memberscoveredUSD0.42trillionbuttradedistortionscoveredmuchmore,USD1.85trillion.
Exposuretotradedistortions&tradereformsin2023
(inbillionUSD)
1200
800
400
0
licensing,quotas
etc.
measures,including
1226
429
175
184
52
154
148
3
57
3021
07
4
Non-automatic
Importtariffs
Price-control
Trade-related
Governmentprocurement
Contingentmeasures
investmentmeasures
Subsidies(excl.
exportsubsidies)
taxes
HarmfulLiberalising
HowwasFigure4prepared?
WeextractedalltheinformationonG20commercialpolicyinterventionaffectingimportsofgoodsthatwereimplementedfromthe2022BaliSummittothe2023NewDelhiSummit.Wedistinguishedbetweenmeasuresthatreducemarketaccess(“harmfulinterventions”)fromthosethatimprovemarketaccess(“lib-eralisinginterventions”).Associatedwitheachofthesegoodstradeinterventionsarethesix-digitproduct(HS2012)codesimplicated.Adoptingstandardapproachesthatcorrectforthedurationthatameasureisinforce,wecalculatedthevalueoftheG20goodsimportsthatwillbecoveredbyeachclassofpolicyinter-ventionin2023.InthisfigureweorderedtheclassesofpolicyinterventionintermsofthedescendingtotalvalueofG20importsexposedtoharmfulintervention.G20measuresthataffectexports–suchasexporttaxes,quotas,bans,andsubsidies–donotcounttowardsthetotalsreportedhere.Dataon2019tradeflowsfromUNCOMTRADEwereusedinthisFigure--aswellasineveryotherfigureinthisFactbookwheretheval-uesoftradeflowscoveredarereported--toavoidthattheCOVID-19pandemicandsubsequentdisruptionofcross-bordersupplychainsfromskewingtheresults.
RecentDevelopmentsinG20CommercialPolicy
11
Figure5.Intra-G20commercialpolicydynamicssincetheBali
Summit:WhichG20membershaveharmedandbenefitedfellow
G20membersthemostoftenandthemostintermsofgoodstrade?
NumberofG20-on-G20harmfulcommercialpolicyinterventions
ImplementingJurisdiction
172
155
120
85
146
159
154
185
126
146
113
126
133
180
142
129
UnitedStates
UK
Turkey
SouthKorea
SouthAfrica
SaudiArabia
Russia
Mexico
Japan
Indonesia
India
EU-27
China
Canada
Brazil
Australia
Argentina
23
11
8
11
2
9
13
12
20
6
13
21
14
4
1
5
50
19
6
23
3
12
8
36
10
27
31
20
26
2
8
5
18
18
19
23
18
18
24
21
10
20
2
22
20
11
8
22
6
1
2
4
3
8
2
3
3
4
3
0
1
7
5
5
6
3
3
3
1
1
3
3
6
2
5
5
5
7
5
5
12
40
13
18
58
14
36
14
9
23
51
51
44
29
34
60
3
8
2
8
13
3
3
3
2
1
3
3
3
5
7
5
16
16
24
14
12
14
6
21
13
16
8
20
9
21
7
5
11
6
3
8
25
21
8
2
21
4
3
9
27
27
5
5
49
68
69
59
53
49
83
33
50
64
46
47
43
86
77
75
216
136
126
95
94
218
206
166
150
88
42
146
123
132
100
141
13
11
11
13
14
11
9
12
10
14
12
11
14
5
7
7
9
2
37
15
6
16
4
3
16
17
17
8
13
24
25
7
32
16
58
34
27
35
19
1
15
32
38
29
33
25
51
52
13
33
31
19
31
20
2
4
27
32
26
26
2
36
28
35
11
1
1
3
2
3
3
1
2
3
8
3
17
1
2
5
温馨提示
- 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
- 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
- 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
- 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
- 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
- 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。
最新文档
- 韩式护栏施工方案
- 第二单元 让机器认识我第3节“认出”一个人 教学设计 2023-2024学年川教版(2019)初中信息技术八年级上册
- 合同范本买卖合同
- 专职老师聘用合同范本
- 增强学生自主学习意识的方法计划
- 班主任与学校管理层的沟通计划
- 歌唱与律动小班音乐教育探讨计划
- 可持续发展在年度计划中的应用
- 法务部合规管理工作回顾与展望计划
- 九年级体育 教学实录(素质练习1) 人教新课标版
- 《现代家政导论》电子教案 1.1模块一项目一家政与家政学认知
- 《人工智能通识教程》(第2版)教学大纲
- 2024年监控摄像头项目建议书
- 2025届高三听力技巧指导-预读、预测
- DB14-T 2779-2023 营造林工程监理规范
- 冀教版数学八年级下册19.2.2 平面直角坐标系中点的坐标特征 教案
- 公安机关人民警察高级执法资格考试试卷(附答案)
- 铁路内燃机车司机(高级工)理论考试题库(浓缩600题)
- 自考03162《林学概论》历年真题打包电子书
- 《积极心理学(第3版)》复习思考题和答案(完整版)刘翔平
- 租房协议书合同范本可下载
评论
0/150
提交评论