高英logicfallacy八大逻辑谬误

LogicalFallacies

错误的推理11-1BS彭秀秀目前一页\总数十六页\编于十三点EightTypesofFallacyDictosimpliciter

绝对判断Hastygeneralization

草率结论Posthoc

牵强附会目前二页\总数十六页\编于十三点Contradictorypremises

矛盾前提Admisericordiam

文不对题Falseanalogy

错误类比Hypothesiscontrarytofact与事实相反的假设Poisoningthewell

井下放毒目前三页\总数十六页\编于十三点Dictosimpliciter

绝对判断Exerciseisgood，so

everybodyshouldexercise.No!目前四页\总数十六页\编于十三点Dictosimpliciter

绝对判断Exerciseisgood，so

everybodyshouldexercise.No!Itmeansanargumentbasedonanunqualifiedgeneralization.

即将普遍规则运用于有特殊情况发生的个别情形之中。目前五页\总数十六页\编于十三点Hastygeneralization

草率结论Fred,theAustralian,stolemywallet.Thus,allAustraliansarethieves.No!目前六页\总数十六页\编于十三点Hastygeneralization

草率结论Fred,theAustralian,stolemywallet.Thus,allAustraliansarethieves.No!

Itappliesaspecialcasetogeneralrule.由个别情形来推断普遍规则.目前七页\总数十六页\编于十三点Posthoc

牵强附会McDonald'sandKFCofferfoods

withlittlenutrition,andthus

wecannotexpectanyfastfoodrestauranttoprovideuswithnutritiousfoods.No!目前八页\总数十六页\编于十三点Posthoc

牵强附会McDonald'sandKFCofferfoods

withlittlenutrition,andthus

wecannotexpectanyfastfoodrestauranttoprovideuswithnutritiousfoods.No!Thecausehasnoconnectionwiththeresult.原因和结果没有必然联系目前九页\总数十六页\编于十三点Hedecidedtogiveupallhisdecisions.No!Contradictorypremises

矛盾前提Whenthepremisesofanargumentcontradicteachother,therecanbenoargument.

当论证的前提相互矛盾时，这立论便不能成立。目前十页\总数十六页\编于十三点Wehopeyou'llacceptourrecommendations.Wespentthelastthreemonthsworkingextratimeonit.

No!Theanswerhasnoconnectionwiththequestion.Admisericordiam

文不对题目前十一页\总数十六页\编于十三点Youngchildrenarelikeflowers---flowersshouldstayawayfromterribleweathertogrow,sochildrenneedtogetridofeverythingnegative.No!Makingananalogybetweendifferentthings.Falseanalogy

错误类比目前十二页\总数十六页\编于十三点IfIhadstudiedharder,Iwoulddefinitelyhavepassedthattest.No!Drawinganysupportableconclusionfromahyperthesisthatisnotture.Hypothesiscontrarytofact与事实相反的假设目前十三页\总数十六页\编于十三点.Poisoningthewell

井下放毒Myopponentisanotoriousliar.Youcan'tbelieveawordthatheisgoingtosay.No!目前十四页\总数十六页\编于十三点.Poisoningthewell

井下放毒Myopponentisanotoriousliar.Youcan'tbelieveawordthatheisgoingtosay.No!PoisoningtheWell,orspeaking“againsttheman”ratherthantheissue,inwhichthepremisesmayonlymakeapersonalattackonapersonwhoholdssomethesis,instead