趴gmat og阅读中文解析GMAT备考咨询系统课小精准1V1集训营

OfficialGuide2018ReadingComprehensionDay10Q530-第一段：Burckhardt的观点,文艺复兴时期的欧洲女性“站在一种完全 看到Krontiris这个人名定位到TinaKrontiris,forexample，问的是例子的作用，那就回的研究都给女人disproportionaterepresentation，而Krontiris他却把不同 都合并为一个概念，符合选项D的意思CE与Krontiris定位：“Thetrendisalsoevident,however,inworksfocusingonthosemiddle-andupper-classEuropeanwomenwhoseabilitytowritegivesthemdisproportionaterepresentationinthehistoricalrecord.”这句话中意思是说：上段末句了对upper-classItalianwomen的generalizations的问题，而这句话在说对middleandupper-classEuropeanwomengeneralizations（这里generalizationsdisproportionaterepresentation念。）那么这个however是转折“observationsaboutupper-classItalianwomen”与“worksfocusingonthosemiddleandupper-classEuropeanwomen”，即不仅品”(居然)也有相同问题。因此选E.文章开头，Burckhardt觉得欧洲文艺复兴时期的女人是standonafootingofperfectequality的，而feministscholar是要强调女人的inequality的，两者意思相反， Burckhardt的意见的作用肯定是要反驳的，因此选CABurckhardt和Kelly之间的view并没有formbasisDThesescholarsstressthewaysinwhichdifferencesamongRenaissancewomen，是为了B&K的generalization（建立在upper-classwomen）。Scholar认为B&K风险的。所以S认为B&K的研究不具有代表性，B选项。AAssumingthatwomenwritersoftheRenaissancearerepresentativeofRenaissancewomeningeneral第二段中K的观点，非scholarBDrawingconclusionsthatarebasedonthestudyofanatypicalgroupofCFailingtodescribeclearlytherelationshipbetweensocialstatusandlicyamongRenaissancewomenKrontiris的观点，题干无关DFailingtoacknowledgetheroleyedbyRenaissancewomeninopposingculturalstereotypesKrontiris的观点，题干无关。而且文中无涉及到Failingtoacknowledge这一点EFailingtoacknowledgethewaysinwhichsocialstatusaffectedthecreativeactivitiesofRenaissancewomen无涉及定位：TinaKrontiris,forexample,inherfascinatingstudyofsixRenaissancewomenwriters,doestendattimestoconflatewomen”and“womenwriters,”assumingthatwomen’sgender,irrespectiveofothersocialdifferences,includinglicy,allowsustoviewwomenasahomogeneousgroupandmakethatgroupanobjectofB原文没有提到licy问Cshesuggeststhatsuchverbaloppositiontoculturalstereotypeswashighlycircumscribed，opposition收到了限制，可见opposition没有成功DculturalstereotypegenderEwomenseldomattackedthebasicassumptionsintheideologiesthatoppressedAsuggestthatKrontiris’sworkisnotrepresentativeofrecenttrendsamongfeministscholarsBunderminetheargumentthatli tewomenoftheRenaissancesoughttoopposesocialconstraintsimposedonthem原文相反：Krontirisisconcernedtoshowwomenintentionallynegotiatingsomepowerforthemselvesatleastintherealmofpublicdiscourseagainstpotentiallyconstrainingideologies,butinhersoberandthoughtfulconcludingremarks,shesuggeststhatsuchverbaloppositiontoculturalstereotypeswashighlycircumscribed，作者说女性在socialconstraintsimposedonthem是有限制的，C正确，showawayinwhichKrontiris’sworkillustratesaoptimistic"assessmentofRenaissancewomen’s的cautiouslyoptimisticDsummarizeKrontiris’sviewoftheeffectofli cyonthelivesofupper-andmiddle-classRenaissancewomenEillustratethewayinwhichKrontiris’sstudydiffersfromthestudiesdonebyBurckhardtandKelly文章问的是Krontiris的不同之处，定位到原文TinaKrontiris,forexample,inherfascinatingstudyofsixRenaissancewomenwriters,doestendattimestoconflate“women”and“womenwriters,...前文提到了历史记载的女人具体的社会 括，随后引出Kroniris这个人很特别地把不同 A文章提到thesocialobstaclesRenaissancewomenfacedKronirisBC文章没有提到accurateE和B选项同义，原没有提Q537-Q537- Ifasteroidsarerubblepiles,however,thetailrepresentingtheveryfastrotatorswouldbemissing,becauseanylooseaggregatespinningfasterthanonceeveryfewhours(dependingontheasteroid'sbulkdensity)wouldflyapart.那么从文章中我们可以知道,是rubblepile形态的asteroids体积都比较大。逻辑链是：if....rubblepiles...-->fastrotatorswouldbemssing--->because...不会fasterthanONCEEVERYFEWHOURS.所以找超过200meter的然后转速还比onceeveryfewhours快的就可以。asteroid，如果转快过onceeveryfewhours，则"wouldcallintoquestionstheconclusion"C-250meters大的，一星期转一 好慢啊排D500metersonceeveryfewhours快（正确答案E1000meters24onceeveryfewhoursAAcollisioncanblastalargeasteroidtobits,butafterthecollisionthosebitswillusuallymoveslowerthantheirmutualescapevelocity.Overseveralhours,gravitywillreassembleallbutthefastestpiecesintoarubblepile.原文这里的内容主要是想讲，collisionbitsescapevelosity和它们后来为了说明大的小行星在撞击之后，如何保持，选EQ541-通过文章结构，我们知道计算tunnelingtimeandbarrierthicknessWignerAsuggestthattunnelingtimeisunrelatedtobarrierthickness原文相反，文中是thetimeittakesaparticletotunnelthroughabarrierincreaseswiththethicknessofthebarrieruntiltunnelingtimereachesaum，时间是BexintheevidencebywhichWignerandEisenbuddiscoveredthephenomenonoftunnelingCdescribedatarecentlychallengedbyRaymondChiaoand原文相反。Raymond也是支持W&EDquestionwhyparticlesengagedinquantumtunnelingrarelyachieveextremelyhighspeedsEex inthebasisforWignerandEisenbud’shypothesis定位：Thiswouldimplythatumtunnelingtimeisreached,tunnelingspeedwillincreasewithoutlimitasbarrierthicknessincreases.文中说的 定位：Thiswouldimplythattunnelingtimereached AtunnelingspeedwouldincreasewithbarrierthicknessBtunnelingspeedwoulddeclinewithbarrierthicknessCtunnelingspeedwouldvarywithbarrier DtunnelingspeedwouldnotbeexpectedtoincreasewithoutEsuccessfultunnelingwouldoccurevenlessfrequentlythanitdoes定位句：Thoughtheextremerapidityofquantumtunnelingwasnotedasearlyas1932,notuntil1955wasithypothesized－byWignerandEisenbud－thattunnelingparticlessometimestravelfasterthanlight.1932investigatorsQTextremerapidity1955子速度大于光速。根据逻辑，investigators当时没有承认：例子速度大于光速。符合