选择作文之英语作文文理分科选择

英语作文文理分科选择【篇一：文理分科英语作文】㈠很多学生要求我给出一篇关于文理分科的文章，个人认为高考陕西区考到的可能性很小，但是也不妨作为正反观点类练手的文章。大家在写作中要注意的一个关键点就是举一反三，模板句在不同类型文章中的有效使用。.一些人认为应该分科，可以让大家有更多时间专注学习自己喜欢的方向，另外可以减少学生学习的压力。.另一些人赞同部分文理，因为这样可以培养学生的通识能力，有利于全面发展，为以后大学的深造打好坚实的基础。.我的看法。recently,whetherstudentsshouldbedividedtosciencestudentsandartonesisunderheateddiscussionamongthepublic.someareinfavorofthedivision,forstudentswillhavemoretimetoconcentrateontheirfavoritesubjects,whichleadstohighefficiencyinstudy.inaddition,thepressurefromstudycanbereduced.onthecontrary,othersobjecttotheformeropinion.theysupposeonlywhenstudentslearnbothsciencesubjectsandartsubjects,cantheybeeducatedtocomprehensivestudents,layingasolidfoundationforthefuturestudyafterenteringcollege.frommyperspective,ireckonthatitmayhavemoreadvantagesthandisadvantagestolearnbothscienceandartsubjects.althoughitwillspendusmoretimeandenergy,it’sbeneficialtostudentsinalongrun（从长远看）.（二）取消高中文理分科，增负还是减负?cancelthedividingofscienceandartinseniormiddleschool,isittoloseloadortoaddload?文理分科几乎是每一个上过普通高中的学生都要面临的一个重要选择。近日，国家教育部就“高中取消文理分科的必要性和可行性”向社会广泛征询意见。一石激起千层浪，该不该取消文理分科的老话题，又成了人们最近热议的话题。dividingofscienceandartisanimportantchoiceforeveryseniormiddleschoolstudent.recently,ministryofeducationofthestateiscollectingopinionsonthepossibilityandfeasibilityofdividingofscienceandart.theoldtopiconceagainbecomesthehottestonenow.但是来自各方的意见却大相径庭：butideasfromdifferentpartiesaretotallyopposite:学生：反对取消文理分科，理由：学习压力会更大；不利于专业学习；students:theyopposetocancelit.thereasonisthatthepressurewillbecomebigger,whichisnotbenefitforspecialtystudy.教育界人士：大多数表示赞同，理由：有利于完善国民知识结构；有利学生全面发展；mostofthepeopleineducationcircleexpresstheiragreement.thereasonisthatitisgoodforcompletingtheknowledgestructureofpeople,whichisalsogoodforstudentsintegrateddevelopment.那么，你认为高中文理，分还是不分?whatsyouridea,agreeordisagree?art,science,orboth?dividingofscienceandartisacommonthingwemeetwhenwestepintohighschool.accordingtoyourinterestandyourcharacteristic,youmakeasuitablechoice.wedontknowwhenitbeginsandwhenitwillgotoend.maybeinoureyeswefeelitisanaturalthing,forusjustmakeachoice;wetakeitasarule.butrecently,ministryofeducationofthestateiscollectingopinionsonthepossibilityandfeasibilityofdividingofscienceandart.theoldtopiconceagainbecomesthehottestonenow.itisanimportantthingforeducators,studentsandparents.differentpartieshavedifferentideas.forpeopleineducationcircle,theyapproveofcancelingthisdividing.becausetheythinktodayin21stcentury,ourcountryeventheentireworldneedsinter-disciplinarytalent,notjustinonearea,thisisnotenough.ifcontemporarystudentsknowalittleinmostareas,itisbetterfortheirfuture,goodforstudentsintegrateddevelopment.ontheotherhand,ashighschoolstudentstheyhavetheirownideas,theyopposetocancelitandtheythinkitwillproducemorepressureinpreparingforthecollegeentranceexaminationandleadtoabadresultthatmoreandmorestudentswillskipclassesbecauseofthiskindofpressureanddislikeartorscience.inmyopinion,iamalsoagainstforcancelingofdividingofartandscience.irememberwheniwasinhighschool,sciencewasatroublesomesubjectforme,ihadalwayshadfewmarksinthesesubjects.totellyouthetruth,fromelementaryschoolon,ibegantodislikemath,ireallycouldntbearthenumbers.sowhenisteppedintothehighschool,whydontileaveitalone?ifitgoeson,iwillgomad.onthecontrary,ilikeChineseandenglish,socialscience,soitiseasierformetoaccepthistory,geographyandpolitics,thusitiseasierformetogotoagooduniversityifichooseart.thisismytrueexperience,whichithinkisalsotheexperienceofmostartstudents.（三）主题为你是否支持取消文理分科，要求写作的方向为支持，可以促进素质教育这一大方向为主题，同时以一笔带过的方式指出取消文理分科的敝处，要求是以90后的眼光来看待这一问题，字数为120〜150字，要符合高考的要求，要注意作文的格式，同时尽量少用简单句，多使用不同类型的丛句，谢谢concerningifweshouldstopseparatingsciencefromartsubjectsinschoolpersonallythinkweprobablyshouldasthisactionwillbebeneficialinfollowingaspects:1:withqualityeducationbeingsomuchstressednowadays,thestudentsareexpectedtoknowalotofthingsinsteadofcompletelyfocusingonsomecertainsubjects.2:studentsshouldbegiventhetimeandchancesothattheycandecidewhattheyreallylikelateronintheuniversityastheycanvirtuallychooseatthattimewhentheyprobablyhaveabetterunderstandingwiththemselves.3:assciencepracticesthelogicwhileartenhancespeoplesemotion,learningthemtogetherwillcertainlydeveloppeopleparalleling.however,weoughttokeepaneyeonthefactthatthereisariskwhichmanystudentswouldfinditdifficultonthesubjectstheydontreallylikewhilethereisnooptiontogivethemup.（四）choosingthelessonstwomonthsago,thestudentsinourschooldecidedtostudyliberalorsciencelessons.somethinkthatitiswiseofthemtochooseliberalartlessons,whileothersinsistontheideathatsciencelessonsisusefultothejob-finding.thestudentswholikeliberalartlessonssaidtheyarefreefromcountingquantitiesofproblemsandcansavethemmuchenergytorememberthecontentappearingintheliberalbooks.theothergroupchoosingthesciencethinktheycanwellpractisetheirbrainandtheywillbemoreandmorecleverdaybyday.inmyopinion,wecandoanythingwelike,andpleaserememberthatwemustrespecteveryonewhomakesthedifferentchoice.ifyoucan,youaresuretodoeverythingwell（五）artandsciencearethetwohandsofhistory.butnowwehavetoseparatethem.isthatfair?idontthinklearningoneofthemisagoodthing.wepeopleborntoknowandchangetheworld.ifweknowonlyahalf,itisjustlikewemarriedapersonwhosenameweyettoknow.butimnotinfavoroflearningbothtoomuch.justskipsomebasicandmostimportanttipsareokay.butthingsarealwayseasiertosaythantodo.ifthenationdidnotchangethencesystem,everynewmethodisimpossible,forthestressgivenbycollegeentranceexamtostudentsarefarmorebeyondtheirability.thatiswhatithink.changeisdifficult.westillhavealongwaytogoandalottodo.butweasanation,asapeoplewillmanageit.【篇二：英语作文文理分科】recently,heighschoolexistinmanypartsofthephenomenonofartsdivision.someofstudentsshouldbedividedtosciencestudentsandartstudentsbythemselvesundernormalcircumstances.somepeopleexpressedoppositiontoartsdivision,forstudentswillhavemoretimetolearnthingsthatinterestandtheyhavemoretimetostudytherequiredsubjects.inaddition,thepressurefromstudycanbereduced.othersobjecttotheopinion,ontheonehandaftertheartsdivisionrounddevelopmentofstudentscannot,ontheotherhandlearningcontentistoosimple,boringstudentswillhave.inmyopinion,artsdivisionisbetterthennot,itismoretimeandefforttolearnthestudy,thestudentsbyreducingthepressureofacademic.【篇三：文理分科英语作文】㈠很多学生要求我给出一篇关于文理分科的文章，个人认为高考陕西区考到的可能性很小，但是也不妨作为正反观点类练手的文章。大家在写作中要注意的一个关键点就是举一反三，模板句在不同类型文章中的有效使用。.一些人认为应该分科，可以让大家有更多时间专注学习自己喜欢的方向，另外可以减少学生学习的压力。.另一些人赞同部分文理，因为这样可以培养学生的通识能力，有利于全面发展，为以后大学的深造打好坚实的基础。.我的看法。recently,whetherstudentsshouldbedividedtosciencestudentsandartonesisunderheateddiscussionamongthepublic.someareinfavorofthedivision,forstudentswillhavemoretimetoconcentrateontheirfavoritesubjects,whichleadstohighefficiencyinstudy.inaddition,thepressurefromstudycanbereduced.onthecontrary,othersobjecttotheformeropinion.theysupposeonlywhenstudentslearnbothsciencesubjectsandartsubjects,cantheybeeducatedtocomprehensivestudents,layingasolidfoundationforthefuturestudyafterenteringcollege.frommyperspective,ireckonthatitmayhavemoreadvantagesthandisadvantagestolearnbothscienceandartsubjects.althoughitwillspendusmoretimeandenergy,it,sbeneficialtostudentsinalongrun（从长远看）.（二）取消高中文理分科，增负还是减负?cancelthedividingofscienceandartinseniormiddleschool,isittoloseloadortoaddload?文理分科几乎是每一个上过普通高中的学生都要面临的一个重要选择。近日，国家教育部就“高中取消文理分科的必要性和可行性”向社会广泛征询意见。一石激起千层浪，该不该取消文理分科的老话题，又成了人们最近热议的话题。dividingofscienceandartisanimportantchoiceforeveryseniormiddleschoolstudent.recently,ministryofeducationofthestateiscollectingopinionsonthepossibilityandfeasibilityofdividingofscienceandart.theoldtopiconceagainbecomesthehottestonenow.但是来自各方的意见却大相径庭:butideasfromdifferentpartiesaretotallyopposite:学生：反对取消文理分科，理由：学习压力会更大；不利于专业学习；students:theyopposetocancelit.thereasonisthatthepressurewillbecomebigger,whichisnotbenefitforspecialtystudy.教育界人士：大多数表示赞同，理由：有利于完善国民知识结构；有利学生全面发展；mostofthepeopleineducationcircleexpresstheiragreement.thereasonisthatitisgoodforcompletingtheknowledgestructureofpeople,whichisalsogoodforstudentsintegrateddevelopment.那么，你认为高中文理，分还是不分？whatsyouridea,agreeordisagree?art,science,orboth?dividingofscienceandartisacommonthingwemeetwhenwestepintohighschool.accordingtoyourinterestandyourcharacteristic,youmakeasuitablechoice.wedontknowwhenitbeginsandwhenitwillgotoend.maybeinoureyeswefeelitisanaturalthing,forusjustmakeachoice;wetakeitasarule.butrecently,ministryofeducationofthestateiscollectingopinionsonthepossibilityandfeasibilityofdividingofscienceandart.theoldtopiconceagainbecomesthehottestonenow.itisanimportantthingforeducators,studentsandparents.differentpartieshavedifferentideas.forpeopleineducationcircle,theyapproveofcancelingthisdividing.becausetheythinktodayin21stcentury,ourcountryeventheentireworldneedsinter-disciplinarytalent,notjustinonearea,thisisnotenough.ifcontemporarystudentsknowalittleinmostareas,itisbetterfortheirfuture,goodforstudentsintegrateddevelopment.ontheotherhand,ashighschoolstudentstheyhavetheirownideas,theyopposetocancelitandtheythinkitwillproducemorepressureinpreparingforthecollegeentranceexaminationandleadtoabadresultthatmoreandmorestudentswillskipclassesbecauseofthiskindofpressureanddislikeartorscience.inmyopinion,iamalsoagainstforcancelingofdividingofartandscience.irememberwheniwasinhighschool,sciencewasatroublesomesubjectforme,ihadalwayshadfewmarksinthesesubjects.totellyouthetruth,fromelementaryschoolon,ibegantodislikemath,ireallycouldntbearthenumbers.sowhenisteppedintothehighschool,whydontileaveitalone?ifitgoeson,iwillgomad.onthecontrary,ilikechineseandenglish,socialscience,soitiseasierformetoaccepthistory,geographyandpolitics,thusitiseasierformetogotoagooduniversityifichooseart.thisismytrueexperience,whichithinkisalsotheexperienceofmostartstudents.（三）主题为你是否支持取消文理分科，要求写作的方向为支持，可以促进素质教育这一大方向为主题，同时以一笔带过的方式指出取消文理分科的敝处，要求是以90后的眼光来看待这一问题，字数为120~150字，要符合高考的要求，要注意作文的格式，同时尽量少用简单句，多使用不同类型的丛句，谢谢concerningifweshouldstopseparatingsciencefromartsubjectsinschoolpersonallythinkweprobablyshouldasthisactionwillbebeneficialinfollowingaspects:1:withqualityeducationbeingsomuchstressednowadays,thestudentsareexpectedtoknowalotofthingsinsteadofcompletelyfocusingonsomecertainsubjects.2:studentsshouldbegiventhetimeandchancesothattheycandecidewhattheyreallylikelateronintheuniversityastheycanvirtuallychooseatthattimewhentheyprobablyhaveabetterunderstandingwiththemselves.ileartenhancespeoplesemotion,learningthemtogetherwillcertainlydeveloppeopleparalleling.however,weoughttokeepaneyeonthefactthatthereisariskwhichmanystudentswouldfinditdifficultonthesubjectstheydontreallylikewhilethereisnooptiontogivethemup.（四）choosingthelessonstwomonthsago,thestudentsinourschooldecidedtostudyliberalorscien