供应商选择调查表

供应商选择调查表内部编号：(YUUT-TBBY-MMUT-URRUY-UOOY-DBUYI-0128)SelectionTool选择供应商的工具SupplierInformationSupplierSuppliername:Corporateheadquartersaddress:Supplierwebpageaddress:Contactname/title:Contactaddress:Contactemail:EMAIL：Otherimportantinformation:Phone:Phone:Fax:Fax:SQEAnalysisWeightWeightRTSReadinessSupplier’sOutgoingQualityLevel/DPPM]供应商出货品质水平/DPPMSupplier’sCustomersLineRejectRate供应商客户的厂内不良率：Supplier’sCustomersFieldRejectRate供应商客户的市场不良率：ForecastedLRR@Customer预估的客户产线不良率SupplierBSupplierCSupplierAForecastedForecastedIFIR@CustomerCUSTOMER的预期初始市场不良率QualitySystemQualityResourcesTOTAL(weighted)总计SQEWorksheetRTSReadinessScore:Detail:HowsoonmaytheproductbesuccessfullyintroducedintoCustomermanufacturing,anddoesthecompatibilityofthedesignmeetCustomer’sneeds?Scoring:1RepresentshighrisktoscheduleandqualityORnotcompatible2Representsmediumrisktoscheduleorquality;compatible时间及品质具有中等风险性，配合度好3Representslowrisktoscheduleorquality;compatible时间及品质具有低风险性，配合度好4Norisktoscheduleorquality;compatible时间及品质无风险性，配合度好Comments备注:Supplier’sOutgoingQualityLevel/DPPMScore:供应商出货品质等级/DPPMDetail:(Supplier’shistory)说明供应商的历史状况SuppliershouldbemeasuringDPPMrates,analyzing/categorizingreasonsforfailures,andtakingappropriatecorrectiveactions.供应商能够计算出不良率，分析失效原因并加以分类，并能够剔除有效的改善对策。Scoring:1SupplierdoesnotmeasureDPPMrate供应商无法计算出不良率2SuppliermeasuresDPPMrate,however,thereisnoanalysis(pareto)orcorrectiveaction供应商能够计算出不良率，但无法提供分析及改善对策。3SuppliermeasuresDPPMrateandperformsanalysis(pareto),however,nocorrectiveactionistaken供应商能够计算出不良率，能够剔除原因分析，但是无法提供改善4SuppliermeasuresDPPMrate,performsanalysis(pareto)andhaseffectivecorrectiveactionsystem供应商能够计算出不良率，提供原因分析及有效的改善对策。GENERALDPPMINFORMATION:a)AgreetoCustomer’sDPPMgoals:?Yes,goalsare_______?Nob)PlantosupportachievementofDPPMgoals:?Yeshed?Planpromisedby_____________计划：?是(相关计划)Comments备注:Supplier’sCustomers’LineRejectRateSScore供应商客户的厂内不良率Detail:(Supplier’scustomers’history)______________(Customer’scurrentgoal)CUSTOMER的现行目标Scoring:1Supplier’scustomers’LRRis2timesworsethanCustomer’scurrentgoal2Supplier’scustomers’LRRisgreaterthanCustomer’scurrentgoal,yetlessthan2timesgreater不良率超过CUSTOMER现行目标值，但是小于其2倍3Supplier’scustomers’LRRisapproximatelyequaltoCustomer’scurrentgoal供应商客户的长期不良率基本与CUSTOMER现行目标一致4Supplier’scustomers’LRRisbetterthanCustomer’scurrentgoal供应商客户的长期不良率优于CUSTOMER现行目标值Supplier’sCustomers’FieldRejectRateSScore:供应商客户的市场不良率Detail:(Supplier’scustomers’history)______________(Customer’scurrentgoal)Scoring:1Supplier’scustomers’FIRis2timesworsethanCustomer’scurrentgoal倍2Supplier’scustomers’FIRisgreaterthanCustomer’scurrentgoal,yetlessthan2timesgreater3Supplier’scustomers’FIRisapproximatelyequaltoCustomer’scurrentgoal供应商客户的市场不良率基本与CUSTOMER现行目标值一致4Supplier’scustomers’FIRisbetterthanCustomer’scurrentgoal供应商客户的市场不良率优于CUSTOMER现行目标值ForecastedLRR@CustomerScore:分数——Detail:(Supplier’sforecasted)_____________________(Customer’scurrentgoal)Scoring:1currentgoalSupplier’sLRRis2timesworsethanCustomer’s2Supplier’sLRRisgreaterthanCustomer’scurrentgoal,yetlessthan2timesgreaterR3Supplier’sLRRisapproximatelyequaltoCustomer’scurrentgoal供应商的产线不良率基本与CUSTOMER现行目标值一致4Supplier’sLRRisbetterthanCustomer’scurrentgoal的产线不良率优于CUSTOMER现行目标值ForecastedIFIR@CustomerScore:数Detail:(Supplier’sforecasted)_____________________(Customer’scurrentgoal)CUSTOMERScoring:1currentgoal数Supplier’sIFIRis2timesworsethanCustomer’s供应商的早期市场不良率超过CUSTOMER现行目标值2Supplier’sIFIRisgreaterthanCustomer’scurrentgoal,yetlessthan2timesgreater不良率超过CUSTOMER的现行目标值，但低于其2倍3Supplier’sIFIRisapproximatelyequaltoCustomer’scurrentgoal供应商的早期市场不良率基本于CUSTOMER现行目标值一致4Supplier’sIFIRisbetterthanCustomer’scurrentgoal供应商的早期市场不良率优于CUSTOMER现行目标QualitySYSTEMScore:数Detail细则:a)ISOCertification:1Yes(circleone:90019002)0Nob)CustomerQualitySystemsAuditscoringranges:b)品质系统稽核得分0Lessthan70%(NotApproved)2Between70–89%(ConditionallyApproved)QualityResourcesScore:数Detail细则:TheSuppliershouldhaveadedicatedQualityDepartmentwithadequatestaffingresourcestoattendtotacticalissuesandaQualityManagerwithtimetoattendtostrategicissues.Additionally,SuppliershouldbewillingtoappointaJointQualityEngineerforeachmfgsite.供应商应当建立专门的品保系统、足够的品保员工参与品质问题的解决，任命品保经理参与公司决策，另外供应商还要在每个制造厂任Scoring:1Inadequateresources系统不健全2Qualitystaff;however,noQualityManager有品保员工，但没有专职品保经理3QualityDepartmentanddedicatedQualityManager有品保员工和专职品保经理4QualityDepartment,QualityManager,andwillingtoappointaJQE有品保员工和专职品保经理，同意任命一名JQELocalSupport支持Score:Detail:SuppliercapabilitytomeetCustomer’s“SupplierQualityStandard”Scoring:供应商目前的状况可以满足客户的“SQS”1Nocommitmenttosupportandwon’tbereadyuntil3monthsafterFirstCustomerShip第一次客户调查没有达到要求且3个月