英语论文的摘要,论文摘要与提纲

英语论文的内容摘要,论文内容摘要与提纲ThistranslationreportactsasasummaryformyC-EtranslationprojectofTrademarkLawofP.R.China,anditsemphasesisonhowtotranslateintoEnglishtheChineseDestructureswithconditionalimplications.Thisprojectisasimulationpracticeforthepurposeofstrengtheningmytranslationability.TheTrademarkLawofP.R.ChinacontainslotsofDestructureswithconditionalimplicationswhichshouldbetranslatedintoconditionalclausesduetolinguisticdifferencesbetweenChineseandEnglish.Thegreatchangeposegreatdifficultytotranslation.Thefirstdifficultyliesinthediversifiedandcomplexstructureswithintricatelogicalrelations.ThesecondstemsfromDe,,structuresvacancyofconjunctionswhichshouldnotmissintheircorrespondingEnglishtranslationsandthechoiceoftheconjunctionisaffectedbythecomplexityofstructure.ThisprojectadoptsVermeersSkoposTheorytothetranslationof6Destructureswithconditionalimplications.ThetargetreadersofthetranslationareEnglish-speakingpeopleeagertogetacquaintedwiththetrademarklawofChina,andthepurposeoftranslationistoprovidethemwithacompleteandreadableEnglishversion.Theauthoradoptsthemethodofsyntacticlinearityforthephrasalverb+De,structures,themethodsofrestructuringanddisconnectingforsimpleclausesandcomplexclauses+6Destructures.TheconjunctioniforwhereischosenaccordingtotherulesoflegalEnglish.ThetranslatoradoptsdifferenttranslationmethodsinthisreporthopingthatthedifficultiesoftranslatingDestructureswithconditionalimplicationscouldbesolvedandatthesametime,couldprovidesomeenlightenmentforothertranslatorsconfrontedwithsimilardifficulties.ABSTRACTThispapermainlyexplorestheusagesofChinesenon-canonicalverbalclassifierphrases〔non-CVClphrasesforshort〕andthenmakesacontrastivestudyonChinesenon-CVClphrasesandrelevantEnglishconstructions〔RECsforshort〕thataresemanticallyandfunctionallysimilartotheChinesenon-CVClphrases.ThefeaturesofChinesenon-CVClphraseshavenotbeeninvestigatedsystematicallyinpreviousstudies.Thispapermakesadetailedanalysisofthesemanticfeaturesandsyntacticdistributionofthesephrases.Itisfoundthatinadditiontoquantifyingevents,non-CVClphrasescanalsoservetheindividuationfunctionoftransformingeventtypesintoeventtokens.Besides,non-CVClphrasesarealsoofanominalcharacter,whichaccountsfortheirrelativelystrongreferentialfunctionasopposedtotheirweakdeclarativefunction.Inaddition,thediversifiedsyntacticdistributionofnon-CVClphrasesisalsodiscussedinthispaper.WiththehelpofChineseandEnglishparallelcorpusandonlineresources,thispaperattemptstofindouttheRECssemanticallyandfunctionallyanalogoustoChinesenon-CVClphrasesandclassifytheseRECsintodifferentgroups:lightverbconstructions,cognateobjectconstructions,doubleobjectconstructionsandnominalandverbalexpressions.AnanalysisisalsomadeofthefeaturesoftheseclassesofEnglishconstructionsorexpressions.ItisfoundthatmostoftheRECsarerelatedtoeventnounstosomedegree.Groundedontheabovediscussion,thispaperconductsacontrastivestudyoftheChinesenon-CVClphrasesandtheRECs,aimingtobringoutthedifferencesbetweenthemintermsofphrasestructure,semanticmeaningandsyntacticdistribution.Thefactorsresultinginthesedifferencesareanalyzedfromacognitiveperspective.ItisproposedthatthedifferencesbetweentheChineselanguageandtheEnglishlanguageatlargeinperspectivepositioningandprominenceselection,cognitivemechanismandscanningmodeconstitutetheunderlyingreasonsforthedifferentwaysofquantifyingeventsanddenotingactionsinthetwolanguages.ABSTRACTFollowingthequickenedpaceofChineseculturesgoingouttotheworld,Chinesefilmsarealsostrivingtowalktowardtheworldtocompetewithothercountriesontheinternationalstage.Consequently,thesubtitlingofChinesefilmsintoforeignlanguageshasattractedincreasedscholarlyattentioninrecentyears.WhatroledoessubtitlingplayinpromotingChinesecultureexportation?Whatsubtitlingstrategiesshouldbeemployedtofulfillthisaim?TheanswertothesequestionscanperhapsbefoundinacasestudyofRedSorghum,thefirstmodernChinesefilmtohavewonaninternationalacclaim.MoYanswinningtheNobelPrizeforLiteraturein2020testifiestothisfilmswidepopularityamongEnglish-speakingviewersanditsfar-reachingimpact.ThisthesisaimstoexaminethestrategiesemployedintheEnglishsubtitlesofRedSorghumandtoanalyzewhysuchsubtitlingstrategiesaswereadoptedbythesubtitlersarebothjustifiedandinstrumentalinenhancingitswarmreceptionbyoverseasaudiences.Twotheoreticaltoolsareadoptedinthepresentstudy:oneissubtitlingtheoriesproposedbyGottliebanddevelopedbyDiaz-Cintasandothers;theotherisVermeersskopostheory.TheIntroductionstatestheresearchbackground,aim,scopeandrationaleofthisstudy.ChapterTwoisacriticalreviewoftherelevantliteratureonthetopic.ChapterThreesummarizesthemainpointsofWesternsubtitlingtheoriesandskopostheory.ChapterFourtriestodescribethegeneralshapeandfeaturesoftheEnglishsubtitlesofRedSorghuminthelightofsubtitlingstrategiesandconstraints.Itisfoundthatsuchstrategiesastransfer,paraphrase,condensation,decimation,deletion,expansion,imitationandresignationarefrequentlyemployedbythesubtitlers.Yetwhatistermedreductivedomesticationstrategy〔RDstrategy〕inthepresentthesisisthebasiconeadopted.ChapterFiveattemptstoexplainfromafunctionalistperspectivewhythesesubtitlingstrategies,especiallysomewhatradicaloneslikedeletion,condensation,rewriting,arejustifiedandwhyRedSorghumequippedwithsuchEnglishsubtitleswaswarmlyreceivedbyWesternaudiences.TheConclusiondiscussesthesignificantimplicationsofRedSorghumssuccessforChinesefilmsgoingabroad.ABSTRACTThetermintertextuality,whichwasintroducedbyFrenchliterarycriticsJuliaKristevainthe1960s,referstotherelationshipbetweentexts.Andithasbeeninthespotlightoftheacademicworldsinceitsdebut.Kristevaclaimsthateverytextisconstructedasamosaicofquotations;everytextistheabsorptionandtransportationofothertexts.Thetheoryofintertextualitynotonlybringsaboutgreatsocial,culturalandhistoricalsignificance,butalsostimulatesanewthoughtandarefreshingresearchperspectivefortheevolutionoftranslationtheory.Biancheng,anovellathatexpressesthelocalism,isthemasterpieceofthefamousmodernChinesewriterShenCongwen.ThestoryhappenedinabordertownnamedChadongofXiangxiinthe1930s,anditdepictsthespeciallocalflavorofXiangxidistrict.Atthesametime,thenovelshowcasesthekindnessofthehumanityandthepurityofthesoulbydescribingthetragicstoryofagirlcalledCuicui.Thenovelhasattractedlotsofreadersathomeandabroadforitsuniqueartisticcharmandvividlocalflavor.ThethesisdealswiththetworepresentativeEnglishversionsofBiancheng,oneisfromthefamousBritishtranslatorGladysYang,theotherisfromtheAmericansinologistJeffreyC.Kinkley.TheauthorengagesintheexplorationofhowtoapplythetheoryofintertextualitytothetranslationofnovelsfromtheoryandpracticeandtriestodigupanewperspectiveconcerningthetranslationstudiesofBianchengasanefforttoprovethefactthatthetheoryofintertextualitycannotonlybeviewedasepistemologybutalsobetakenasmethodologyfortheresearchofnoveltranslation.Allinall,tworesearchmethodsareincludedinthisthesis.Firstandforemost,thecombinationofqualitativeanalysisandquantitativeanalysisrunsthroughthewholethesisinordertoreflectthefrequencydistributionforuseofdomesticationandforeignization;inaddition,thethesismainlyusesthecaseanalysis,especiallyinthemainbodypart.ItexpoundstheenlightenmentthetheoryofintertextualitybringstothenoveltranslationbycomparingdifferenttranslationsofthedifferentChineseculture-specificitems〔CSI〕intermsoflinguistic,material,social,religiousandecologicalculture.Thefeaturesoftheapplicationoftheintertextualityintothetranslationstudiesareasfollows:itpaysmuchmoreattentiontothetranslatorssubjectivityandmanifeststhenatureoftranslationactivitiesasintertextualityinaclearerway.Thus,ithelpstobuildthenewintertextualconnectionsbetweenthesourcetextandthetargettextandprovidefreshnewtheoreticalsupportforthemacroscopicconstructionofthetranslationstudies.Thisthesiscanbedividedintosixparts.IntheIntroduction,theauthordisplaysabriefintroductionoftheresearchbackground,researchsignificance,themethodology,andthestructureofthethesisrespectively.ChapterOneisthereviewofthepreviousstudiesonBianchenganditsEnglishtranslationsbothathomeandabroad.ChapterTwoisprimarilyconcernedwiththeestablishmentanddevelopmentofthetheoryofintertextuality,andthentherelationshipbetweenthetheoryofintertextualityandtranslationwillbepresented.ChapterThreeisaboutBianchenganditstwoEnglishtranslations.ItnotonlypresentsabriefintroductionofShenCongwen,butalsoelaboratesthedescriptionofthetwotranslatorsGladysYangandJeffreyC.Kinkley.Meanwhile,itprovidesuswiththebackgroundinformationabouttheformationprocessofthesetwoEnglishversions.ChapterFouristhemainbodyofthethesis.TheauthorinitiatesthecomparativestudyofthetwoEnglishversionsofBianchengbydetailedanalysisoffivedifferenttypesofculture-specificitems,namelylinguistic,material,social,religiousandecologicalculture,ThelastpartistheConclusion.TheauthorholdsthatBianchengcontainsalotofdifferenttypesofintertextualsignalsofChineseculture-specificitemswhichcanbetracedinotherprevioustexts.Atthesametime,becauseofthedifferentenvironmentandculturalbackground,thetwotranslatorssharedifferentunderstandingsontheintertextualsignalsofthoseculture-specificitems,resultinginthetwotranslatorsdifferentchoicesofdifferenttranslationstrategies.GladysYangsversioninvolvesbothdomesticationandforeignization,andforeignizationoccupiesalargerpercentage.Asthisversiongotpublishedin1981,thereadersfromtheEnglishspeakingcountriescouldgraspthestyleandcontentofthetranslatedversioninaratherdifficultway;whileKinkleysversionwasoutin2018,andhetendedtousemoreforeignizationthanthatofGladysYang,whichhelpedtomeettheneedsofthoseforeignreaderswhonotonlypossessedbasicknowledgeofChinaandChineseculture,butalsoyearnedforhavingabetterunderstandingofChineseculture.Inaddition,Kinkleysversionsuccessfullymaintainedthelocalflavorofthesourcetext,helpstransmitChineseculturetotheworld,andmakingitaworthwhilematerialforfurtherstudy.ABSTRACTWiththerapiddevelopmentofglobalization,internationalacademicexchangeandcooperationareincreasinglystrengthened.Today,mostChineseuniversitieshaveprovidedEnglishwebpageprofilestodrawmoreattentionfromoverseastudents,foreignscholarsoracademicinstitutions.Universitywebpageprofile,