![如何进行医学实验室风险评估_第1页](http://file4.renrendoc.com/view/d801ba053bccf8289b8fdbd1d39dc722/d801ba053bccf8289b8fdbd1d39dc7221.gif)
![如何进行医学实验室风险评估_第2页](http://file4.renrendoc.com/view/d801ba053bccf8289b8fdbd1d39dc722/d801ba053bccf8289b8fdbd1d39dc7222.gif)
![如何进行医学实验室风险评估_第3页](http://file4.renrendoc.com/view/d801ba053bccf8289b8fdbd1d39dc722/d801ba053bccf8289b8fdbd1d39dc7223.gif)
![如何进行医学实验室风险评估_第4页](http://file4.renrendoc.com/view/d801ba053bccf8289b8fdbd1d39dc722/d801ba053bccf8289b8fdbd1d39dc7224.gif)
![如何进行医学实验室风险评估_第5页](http://file4.renrendoc.com/view/d801ba053bccf8289b8fdbd1d39dc722/d801ba053bccf8289b8fdbd1d39dc7225.gif)
版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领
文档简介
HowtoEvaluateRiskinthe
MedicalLaboratoryJamesH.Nichols,PhD,DABCC,FACBProfessorofPathology,MicrobiologyandImmunologyMedicalDirectorofClinicalChemistryandPoint-of-CareTestingVanderbiltUniversitySchoolofMedicineMedicalDirector,ClinicalChemistryNashville,Tennessee,USAjames.h.nichols@
1Objectives1.Discussthesourcesoferrorinthemedicallab2.ReviewQCasameansofcontrollinganalyticalerror3.Identifyriskmanagementasatotalqualityassuranceofthetestingprocess4.Describeregulatorychangesadoptingriskmanagementinthelaboratory
2MedicalErrorAnadverseeventornearmissthatispreventablewiththecurrentstateofmedicalknowledge.(theQualityInteragencyCoordinationTaskForce)
MedicalErrorsInstituteofMedicineoftheNationalAcademiesreport1999Medicalerrorskill44,000-98,000patientsinUShospitalseachyear.“Numberoneproblemfacinghealthcare”LucienLeape,HarvardProfessorofPublicHealthMedicalErrors2002CommonwealthFundreportestimatedthat22.8millionpeoplehaveexperiencedamedicalerror,personallyorthroughatleastonefamilymemberReinforcesthe1999IOMreport,“ToErrisHuman”Annualcostsestimatedat$17–29billionUSAgencyforHealthcareResearchandQuality(AHRQ)estimatemedicalerrorsarethe8thleadingcauseofdeathintheUS–higherthan:MotorVehicleAccidents(43,458)Cancer(42,297)AIDS(16,516)LaboratoryErrorsAreviewoftheliteraturefoundthemajorityoferrorsoccurinthepreandpostanalyticalphases.
BoniniP,PlebaniM,CeriottiF,RubboliF.ClinChem2002;48:691-698.Manymistakesarecalled“laberror”,butactuallyduetopoorcommunication,actionsbyothersinvolvedinthetestingprocess,orpoorlydesignedprocessesoutsidethelab’scontrol.Medicalerrorsoccurinprevention,diagnosisanddrugtreatmentoccur.Amongerrorsindiagnosis;50%werefailuretouseindicatedtests,32%werefailuretoactonresultsoftests,and55%involvedavoidabledelayindiagnosis.LeapeLL,BrennanTA,LairdN,etal.NEngJMed1991;324:377-84.7HistoricalQualityControlQualitycontrolhistoricallyusedtoreduceerrorsandpreventthereleaseofincorrectresultsfromthelaboratory!Bornfromthe1950’sindustrialmodelofqualityinanalyticalandfactoryprocessesQualitycontrolisastabilizedsurrogatesampleanalyzedlikeapatientsamplecontainingknownamountofmeasuredanalyte.IftheanalyticaltestsystemcanachievethedesiredresultusingaQCsample,thenthesystemisstableandqualitypatientresultsareassumedtobeproduced.8QualityControlAdvantagesQChastargetvalues,ifassayrecoverstarget,thensystemisassumedtobestable(instrument,reagent,operator,sample)ShiftinQC=Shiftinqualitypatientresults!WarnsoftestresultproblemsbeforereleasetophysicianQualityControlDisadvantagesIfQCnotanalyzedfrequentlyenoughorlabfailstotakeactionwhenQCfails,qualityofpatientresultsaffected!Withnewautoverificationorcontinuousreleaseofresultsbychemistryandhematologyanalyzers-PossibletoreleasepatientresultsbeforeaproblemisdetectedWhenaproblemisdetected,labmustgobackandreanalyzepatientssincelast“good”QCandpossiblysendoutcorrectedresults.Clinicalactioncouldbetakenonerroneousresultsintheinterimofcorrectinganunrecognizedissue!Despiteitslimitations,QCremainsanimportantmeansofdetectingandpreventinglaboratoryerrors!1011SystematicErrorsLiquidQCdoesagoodjobatdetectingsystematicerrors,like:ReagentdeteriorationorpreparationImproperstorageorshipmentconditionsIncorrectoperatortechnique(dilution,pipettesetting)Calibrationerrors–wrongsetpoint,factorsErrorswhichaffecteverytestinaconstantandpredictablemannerErrorsthatoccurfromonepointforwardorforalimitedperiodoftime12RandomErrorsLiquidQCdoesapoorjobatdetectingrandomerrorsunlesstheerrorspecificallyoccurswiththeQCsampleorincreasedresultvariabilityisnoted.Errorswhichaffectindividualsamplesinarandomandunpredictablefashion,like:ClotsBubblesInterferingsubstances13QCandLabErrorsQCQC09:0009:00LineLeak11:0001:15HemolyzedsampleQCdailyat09:00,twolevelsLineleakoccursat11:00,dispensespartialreagentcausing25%decreaseinvalues,notdetecteduntilnextdayQCat09:00.(SystematicError),mustreanalyzeallspecimenssincepreviousQCat09:00,thepreviousday.Hemolyzedspecimen(Randomerror)affectsonesample14HistoryofQualityControlQualitycontrolhasbeentraditionalmeansofmanagingerrorinthelaboratory!CLIA’67–requireddailyQCasintegralpartoftestingprocessCLIA’88-reaffirmed“twolevelsofQCpertestperday”(bloodgasesevery8hours)CAPadvocatesdailyQCthroughinspectionandaccreditationTheJointCommissionfocusesonpatientsafetyandpreanalytic,analyticandpostanalyticprocessesISOQCRecommendations15ISO15189–5.6.1Thelaboratoryshalldesigninternalcontrolsystemsthatverifytheattainmentoftheintendedqualityofresults.Specialattentionshouldbepaidtoeliminationofmistakesintheprocessofhandlingsamples,requests,examinations,reports,etc.Documentationshouldincludequalitycontrolproceduresbasedonmanufacturerinstructionsforuse.InternalQualityControl(internaltothelaboratory)isdefinedasasetofproceduresundertakenbylaboratorystaffforthecontinuousmonitoringofoperationandtheresultsofmeasurementsinordertodecidewhetherresultsarereliableenoughtobereleased.TheregularanalysisofQCmaterialscanserveasanessentialcomponentofalaboratory’sinternalcontrolsystem.16QualityinLaboratoryTestingDespiteanalyzingtheminimumrequired2levelsQC/day,wehaveallexperiencederroneouslaboratoryresults!QualityismorethanQC!Qualityis:TestingthatissafeandreliableAppropriateuseoftechnologytomeetmedicalneedsTestresultsthatcanbetrustedformedicalmanagementAlab’sreputationdependsonqualityofitsresults!Whatshouldbethelabgoalsforerrors?UnacceptableErrorsDeaths/106enplanements 0.2PPMDeaths/106generalanesthesiainductions 2-5Viraltransmissions/106transfusions 29Results>7SD/106automatedchemtests 100Lostbags/106airplanepassengers 5000Failures/106proficiencytests 14,000Difference>5%/106hematocrittests upto 190,000WitteD&VanNessS.FrequencyofUnacceptableResultsinPoint-of-CareTesting.ArchPatholLabMed123:761,1999SigmaMetricsSigmametricsareanindustrialmeasureofqualityinafactoryprocess
-estimatesrateofdefectsinproductsGoalofsigmametrics:ImprovecustomersatisfactionBalancenumberofrejectedproductswiththeincreasedcostrequiredtoimproveprocesses(tolowerdefectrates)SixsigmaconsensusforbalancingrejectionagainsttheincreasedcostsofimprovingerrorsforindustrialprocessesSixsigmawasadoptedandpopularizedintotheclinicallaboratoriesin1990’s18SigmaPerformanceNeedforQualityLaboratoryTestingLaboratorytestinginfluences>70%ofallmedicaldecisions.>7billionlabtestsconductedintheU.S.annually
SilversteinMD.Anapproachtomedicalerrorsandpatientsafetyinlaboratoryservices.AwhitepaperpreparedfortheQualityInstituteMeeting,MakingtheLaboratoryaPartnerinPatientSafety.DivisionofLaboratorySystems,CentersforDiseaseControlandPrevention,April2003./mlp/qiconference/
BeyondSixSigmaWith>7billiontestsconductedintheUSannually,sixsigma(3.4defects/milliontests)meansreleasing23,800incorrectlabtestsannuallyintheUS!
Anysingleresulterrorcouldmeanamisdiagnosis,failuretotreatanillnessorincorrecttreatmentselection!Viruscontaminationofbloodproduct,IncorrectcancerdiagnosisMissedheartattack!Whatifthatwrongtestresultbelongedtoyouorafamilymember?Foramedicallaboratory,sixsigmaisanunacceptablegoal!Weneedtogo“beyondsixsigma”forlaboratoryperformance,withagoalofZEROerrorsthatreachthepatient!2122RiskDefinitionRisk–thechanceofsufferingorencounteringharmorloss(Webster’sDictionaryandThesaurus,1993Landoll,Ashland,Ohio)RiskisthepotentialforanerrortooccurRiskDefinitionISO/IECGuide51–RiskcanbeestimatedthroughacombinationoftheprobabilityofoccurrenceofharmandtheseverityofthatharmRISK=(Frequency)x(SeverityHarm)x(Detection)↑numberoferrors=greaterrisk↑harm=greaterriskInabilitytodetectanerror=greaterriskRiskissimplyaratingscaletoranktheorderforaddressingpotentialerrorsinlab(withlimitedavailableresources)23MedicalErrorsThePersonEasiertoblameapersonthananinstitutionforerrors.Inaviation,90%ofqualitylapsesarejudgedtobeblameless.TheSystemActivefailuresduetopersonalinteractionwithsystemLatentconditions,weaknessesinsystemduetodesignflawsorheirarchicaldecisionsNeedtoengineersystemsthatpreventdangerouserrorsandareabletotolerateerrorsandcontaintheireffectsReasonJ.BMJ2000;320:768-770.IdentifyingRiskintheLaboratoryThereisno“perfect”device!AnydevicecanandwillfailundertherightconditionsEverydeviceisdifferent!(universal2levelsQC/daydoesn’tfiteverysituation,mayneedmorefrequentQC–especiallyiffrequentstaffturnoverorunstablereagent)Anydiscussionofriskmuststartwithwhatcangowrongwithatest(errors)Labtestsarenotfool-proof,forasufficientlytalentedfool!26CLSIProject:EP23LaboratoryQualityControlBasedonRiskManagement.JamesH.Nichols,Ph.D.,ChairholderEP23describesgoodlaboratorypracticefordevelopingaqualitycontrolplanbasedonmanufacturer’sinformation,applicableregulatoryandaccreditationrequirements,andtheindividualhealthcareandlaboratorysetting27EP23LaboratoryQCBasedon
RiskManagementMedicalRequirementsforTestResultsTestSystemInformation:ProvidedbythemanufacturerObtainedbytheLaboratoryInformationaboutHealthCareandTest-SiteSettingInputInformationProcessRiskAssessmentOutputLaboratoryDirector’sQCPlanPostImplementationMonitoringContinuousImprovementRegulatoryandAccreditationRequirementsCLSIEP23TableWhereistheRiskin
theProcess?28WhatCouldPossiblyGoWrong?IdentifyingRiskintheLaboratoryFollowthesamplethroughthetestingprocess!Ateachstep,ask“Whatcouldpossiblygowrong?”Foreachhazardidentified,defineamitigationstep,awaytominimizetheriskoferroroccurring!Summarizethehazardsandactionsinaqualitycontrolplan!29StepsoftheTestingProcessPatientNeedforTestOrderPatientPreparationSpecimenCollectionLabReceiptAnalysisResultVerificationAcknowledgeResultOrderTreatmentTreatmentPreanalyticalPostanalyticalTransporttoLabAnalyticalProcessingFishboneDiagramfromCLSIEP23…RefertoAppendixAinCLSIEP18formorecomprehensivelistoferrorsourcesSourcesofLaboratoryErrorTestSystem:Reagentcontamination,deterioration,lotvariationReactionfluctuationsInadequatesamplingImproperorlossofcalibrationElectronicormechanicalfailurePowersupplyEnvironment:TemperatureandairflowHumidityLightintensityAltitudeOperator:Improperspecimenprep,handlingIncorrecttestinterpretationFailuretofollowtestsysteminstructionsCLIAInterpretiveGuidelinesforLaboratories.AppendixC,SubpartK.§493.1256Standard:ControlProcedures.InterpretiveGuidelines§493.1256(a)–(c)./Regulations-and-Guidance/Legislation/CLIA/Interpretive_Guidelines_for_Laboratories.html
33RiskManagementHolisticorglobalapproachtoqualityassuranceincorporatingpreanalytic,analyticandpostanalyticphasesoftestingEveryinstrumentordeviceisdifferentHazardanalysisandmitigationHazardanalysisdefinesthesourcesofpotentialerrorforaninstrumentordevice
andameansofdetectingorpreventingtheerror(mitigation)34ManufacturerChecks–AlternativeQCSomedeviceshaveinternalcheckswhichareperformedautomaticallywitheveryspecimen:Developmentofaline(Pregnancytest,Occultblood)Sensorsignal(bloodgasanalyzer,clots)Flowresistanceandliquidsensors(clotsorbubblesinchemistryandhematologyanalyzerpipettes)Otherchecksengineeredintoinstrument:Barcodingofreagentexpirationdates(preventsuse)LockoutfeaturesthatrequiresuccessfulQCDisposableanalyzercuvettes/pipettetips(carry-over)Temperatureindicatorinshippingcarton35QCandRiskManagementAnalyzerReagentFluidics,pipetting,electronics,motorsSomeinternalchecksdetectmechanicalandelectronicfailuresChemistryofreactionIntricatelylinkedwiththeanalyzerSusceptibletoenvironmenteffects36QCandRiskManagementTwolevelsofQCeachday,detectserrorsfrommanysourcesAnalyzer(pipets,mechanical,electrical)Reagent(storage,drift)Operator(calibration,dilution)Environment(reagentandsample)Automatedanalyzershavemanypartsandsourcesoferror,notallofwhicharedetectedbyinternalchecks.QCdoesagoodjobofdetectingsystematicerrorsthatpersistintime,butmayfailtodetectrandomerrorsoccurringwithsinglesamples.Randomerrors,likehemolysis–requiresserumindicesonchemanalyzer,visualsampleinspectionand/orphlebotomisttrainingforsamplecollectionissues37PointofCareQCandRiskManagementDeviceTestCartridgeReadstestcartridgesignalInternalelectronicchecksmaintainreaderwithinnarrowspecificationsChemistryofreactionContainsfluidics,calibrant,internalQC38QCandRiskManagementDeviceOnlyreadssignalElectronicscheckenvironment(temp)anddeviceintegrityLocksouttestingwhenoutsidespecificationsTestCartridgeActsastheanalyzerRiskfromenvironmentandoperatoreffectsQConcartridgeevaluateschemistrywitheachtestAdditionalcontrolprocessesforsampleandforoperatortechnique39QCandRiskManagementQCisexpensive,consumesreagentandlaborwithoutproducingresultsthatcanbebilled.ThepresenceofengineeredcontrolprocessesonnewerPOCTdevicesraisethequestionofwhenandhowthesecontrolscansubstitutefortwolevelsofliquidQC?Howtobestcontrolunit-usePOCTdevices?LabDirectormustbalancerequirementsforQC(2levels/day)againstcostandavailabilityofalternativecontrolswithinthetestsystemRiskmanagementandwalkingthroughthetestingprocesstoidentifyhazardsandsourcesoferrorcanhelplabsidentifytherightbalanceofliquidQCwithengineered-builtincontrolprocessesonthedevicesIndividualizedQualityControlPlanIndividualizedQualityControlPlanRiskAssessmentQualityControlPlanQualityAssessment40CLIANewIQCP
CLIA,CAPandJointCommissionRequirementsTwolevelsofliquidQCrequiredeachdayoftesting
ORLaboratorydevelopsanIndividualizedQualityControlPlan(IQCP):Balancebuilt-incontrolprocesseswithliquidQCReducefrequencyofliquidQCtominimumrecommendedbymanufacturerMaximizeclinicaloutcome,availablestaffresourcesandcosteffectivenessinthelabConsidersthelaboratoryprocessfortestingandriskoferrorsateachstepofthetestingprocess!41WhatHaveWeLearnedFromOurIQCP?QCwasexcessive.Past,i-STAT,QCthedevice(x27i-stats)-separatetestsystemsLotshipments(testoneachdevice)MonthlyQCcartridges(oneachdevice)6monthcorrelations/linearities(eachdevice)BUT…Chemistryisinthecartridge–shouldvalidateeachlotofcartridgesusingsubsetofi-stats(whicharejustreaders)Rotatei-statsHighmidandlowQClevelssameas3vialsinlinearityset–sodon’tneedtopurchaseseparatelinearity42Before:(QCthedevice)Shipments= 3QCx5daysx6x/yr= 90testsQCmonthly= 3QCx27i-stats= 81testsLinearities= 27i-statsx3levelsx3repsx2x/yr= 486tests6mocorrelations=10patientsx27i-stats= 270tests
TOTAL= 927testsAfter:(QCthecartridges,centralizedshipments)Shipments= 3QCx6x/yr= 30testsQCmonthly= 3QCx5lotcartridges(max)x12=
180testsLinearities= alreadydonemonthlyasQC= 0tests6mocorrelations=5pts/shipmentx2old/newx6x/yr= 60tests TOTAL=270testsSavingsof657cartridgesperyear43WhatHaveWeLearnedFromOurIQCPs?FalselyDecreased
GlucoseMeterResultsComplaintfromanintensivecareunitofsporadicfalselydecreasedglucosemeterresultsImmediaterepeattestonsamemeter,gavesignificantlyhigher“clinicallysensible”valuesInspectionofunitfoundnursestakingproceduralshortcutstosavetimeBottlesofteststripsdumpedoncounterinspareutilityroomSomestripsnotmakingitintotrash,fallingbackoncounterandbeing“REUSED”44RiskofErrorfrom
OpenReagentsGlucoseteststripsexposedtoairforaslittleas2hourshavebeenshowntocause-26%bias.1Stripsleftoncountersposeriskofreuse,leadingtofalselylowresults.Somemeterscatchreuseand“error”preventingaresult.Othermetersdonot!245KefferP,KampaIS.Diabetes1998;47;abs0170.SilvermanBC,HumbertsonSK,StemJE,NicholsJH.Operationalerrorscauseinaccurateglucoseresults.DiabetesCare2000;23:429-30.ReagentErrors:ExpiredReagentsCentersforDiseaseControl“Checkandrecordexpirationdatesofreagents/kits,anddiscardanyreagentsorteststhathaveexpired.”1U.S.FoodandDrugAdministration“Checktheexpirationdateonthet
温馨提示
- 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
- 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
- 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
- 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
- 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
- 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。
最新文档
- 初中物理课件-平面镜成像微
- 《广告法基本培训》课件
- 《超级发廊管理》课件
- 质量基础知识培训课件
- 《资本积累》课件2
- 公共关系练习题练习卷附答案
- 环境监测初级复习试题有答案
- 《DSCDMA信令流程》课件
- 《积极维护人身权》课件
- 《高技术概论》课件
- 304不锈钢管材质证明书
- 民用机场不停航施工安全管理措施
- 港口集装箱物流系统建模与仿真技术研究-教学平台课件
- 杭州湾跨海大桥项目案例ppt课件
- 优秀教材推荐意见(真实的专家意见)
- 新教科版2022年五年级科学下册第2单元《船的研究》全部PPT课件(共7节)
- QTD01钢质焊接气瓶检验工艺指导书
- 辛弃疾生平简介(课堂PPT)
- 人教版七年级英语下册全册英语单词默写直接打印
- 《炉中煤》课件.ppt
- 公共卫生服务考核评分标准(新)
评论
0/150
提交评论