地方政府重大行政决策程序法治化探析,行政管理论文

地方重大行政决策程序法治化探析,行政管理论文本篇论文目录导航：【题目】地方重大行政决策程序法治化探析【第一章】【第二章】【第三章】【第四章】【第五章】【结束语/以下为参考文献】摘要法令行则国治，法令弛则国乱。法治是一个国家发展的重要保障，是治国理政的基本方式。厉行法治是当代社会的一项普遍的政治原则和社会行为准则，也是中国社会政治发展的必然归宿。重大行政决策因其广泛性、全局性、综合性的特征使其成为行政管理中的关键环节，越来越遭到社会各界的广泛关注。在行政权日益扩大化的今天，重大行政决策所面临的决策环境日益复杂，决策难度也随之增加，这就对地方做出重大行政决策提出了更高层次的要求。然而在实际的行政决策活动中，拍脑袋决策，拍胸脯执行，拍屁股走人的现象屡见不鲜。为了实现行政决策的科学化、民主化和法治化，减少决策失误造成的损失，保证国家行政管理的秩序，必需要有完善、统一的重大行政决策程序法律法规，以此为根据，按照法定程序制定重大行政决策、并严格依法执行，进而实现重大行政决策程序的法治化。因而，对于地方来讲，实现依法决策，推进重大行政决策程序法治化，不管是营造稳固的决策民意基础，还是保证各项工作的顺利完成，或是推进法治建设都具有非常重要的意义。通过对现有重大行政决策程序法规、规章以及行政规范性文件的梳理，明晰了重大行政决策程序立法层面的现在状况，并结合重大行政决策程序的执行状况，进一步分析了重大行政决策程序法治化经过中存在的问题，进而提出了推动地方重大行政决策程序法治化建设的对策建议。论文分为下面几部分：第一部分是绪论，主要是文章的研究意义、国内外研究现在状况、研究方式方法等。第二部分是理论支撑及概念界定。在阐述文章理论支撑的基础上，对论文中的相关概念做了界定。第三部分是我们国家地方重大行政决策程序法治化现在状况。主要从重大行政决策程序的立法与执行两方面阐述。立法方面主要基于对当前我们国家重大行政决策程序规范性法律文本的梳理；执行方面主要通过对兰州市建立城镇居民生活用水阶梯价格制度听证会的实证考察。第四部分是重大行政决策程序法治化经过中存在的问题。针对重大行政决策程序法治化现在状况，总结出了立法缺位、执法不严、公民介入决策的渠道不畅以及决策信息公开不全面，缺乏与公众的信息互动等几方面存在的问题。第五部分是推动我们国家地方重大行政决策程序法治化建设的对策建议。包括推进重大行政决策程序的法制体系建设、加强重大行政决策程序的法治观念、强化对重大行政决策程序的监督以及保障公众有效介入重大行政决策等几方面的建议。本文关键词语：重大行政决策程序；法治化；地方；程序规范ABSTRACTEnforcethelawtomakepeaceandstabilityofacountry,laxlawsmakeacountrybecomechaotic.Lawisanimportantguaranteeforthedevelopmentofacountryisthebasicwayofmanagingstateaffairs.Rigorouslyenforcetheruleoflawisauniversalprincipleofpoliticalandsocialbehaviornormsofmodernsociety,andalsoafinaldestinationofthesocialandpoliticaldevelopmentofChina.Unlikemajoradministrativedecision-makingofgeneraladministrativedecision-making,becauseofitsbroad,globalandcomprehensivefeaturesmakeitakeylinkintheadministration,moreandmoreattentioninthecommunity.Increasinglyexpansioninthegovernmentexecutivepowertoday,majoradministrativedecisionsfacingincreasinglycomplexdecision-makingenvironment,alsoincreasesthedifficultyofthedecision,whichthelocalgovernmenttomakemajoradministrativedecisionsputforwardhigherrequirements.However,Inthecaseofactualdecision-makingactivities,pattinghisheadtomakedecisions,boldlyexecuteddecision,butdecision-makingisaproblemthatnooneisresponsibleforthecommon.Inordertoachievescientific,democratizationandtheruleoflawofadministrativedecision-making,reducethelossescausedbywrongdecisions,andensureorderlyadministrationoftheState,theremustbeasoundmajoradministrativedecision-makingprocessasaguarantee,andletthisprogramintheformoflawfinalized,onlytheformationofmajoradministrativedecision-makingprocesstoimprovetherulesandregulationsinorderonthisbasis,accordingtothelawtoprotectmajoradministrativedecision-making,implementationoflaw,ruleoflawinordertoachievemajoradministrativedecision-makingprocess.Therefore,forthelocalgovernment,implementationdecisionsaccordingtothelaw,topromotethelegalizationofmajoradministrativedecision-makingprocess,whetheritisfortheGovernmenttoensurethesuccessfulcompletionofthework,ortocreateasolidbasisforgovernmentdecision-makingofpublicopinion,promotetheruleoflaworagovernmentbuildinghasaverySignificance.Bycombingthemajoradministrativedecision-makingprocessontheexistinglaws,regulationsandadministrativenormativedocuments,clearthestatusofmajoradministrativedecision-makingprocessofthelegislativelevel,combinedwiththestatusofimplementationofmajoradministrativedecision-makingprocessonmajoradministrativedecisionsoflocalgovernmentlawprogramoftheoverallstatushaveamoreclearunderstanding.Atthesametimesummarizesthemajoradministrativedecision-makingprocessofthelegalizationprocessproblemsandanalyzesthereasonsforthis,andthenproposedtopromotelocalmajoradministrativedecision-makingprocessofbuildingtheruleoflawcountermeasures.Thispaperisdividedintothefollowingparts:Thefirstpartistheintroduction,itistostudythesignificanceofthearticle,currentresearch,researchmethodsandinnovationsanddeficiencies.Thesecondpartisthetheoreticalsupportandrelatedconcepts.Itdescribesthetheoreticalsupportofthearticle,anddefinesthemajoradministrativedecision-makingprocessrelatedtotheconceptoftheruleoflaw.Thethirdpartisaboutthestatusofourlocalgovernmentmajoradministrativedecision-makingprocessoftheruleoflaw.Mainlyfromtheimplementationofmajorlegislativeandadministrativedecision-makingprocessbothpaper.Legislationismainlybasedonthecurrentmajoradministrativedecision-makingprocessofnormativelegaltextscomb;implementationmainlythroughtheestablishmentofLanzhouurbanhouseholdwaterpriceladdersystemhearingsempiricalstudycombiningthesetwoaspectsdrawnmajoradministrativeofLocalGovernmentdecision-makingprocessoftheoverallstatusoftheruleoflaw.Thefourthpartisthemajoradministrativedecision-makingprocessofthelegalizationprocessproblemsandcauseanalysis.Accordingtocurrentsituationofmajoradministrativedecision-makingproceduresundertheruleoflaw,summeduptheabsenceoflegislation,laxenforcement,poordecision-makinginformationchannelsandcitizenparticipationinpublicdecision-makingisnotcomprehensive,thelackofgovernmentinteractwithinformationandotheraspectsofthepublicandsoon,andanalyzesthereasons.Thefifthpartissomesuggestionstopromotethemajoradministrativedecision-makingprocessundertheruleoflawandLegalConstructionofLocalGovernment.Includingthelegalsystemtopromotetheconstructionofmajoradministrativedecision-makingprocess,enhancetheruleoflawmajoradministrativedecision-makingprocess,strengthenthesupervisionofmajoradministrativedecision-makingprocessandtoguaranteeeffectivepublicparticipationinthemajoradministrativedecision-makingandsoon.KeyWords:Majoradministrativedecision-makingProcesses;Undertheruleoflaw;Localgovernment;Programspecification目录摘要ABSTRACT第一章绪论一、研究背景及意义〔一〕研究背景〔二〕研究意义二、研究现在状况〔一〕国外的研究现在状况〔二〕国内的研究现在状况〔三〕国内外研究简评三、研究方式方法〔一〕文献研究〔二〕实地研究四、研究的思路和主要内容〔一〕研究思路〔二〕主要内容五、创新点与缺乏〔一〕创新之处〔二〕缺乏之处第二章理论支撑及概念界定一、理论支撑〔一〕程序正当原理〔二〕有限理论〔三〕依法治国理论二、概念界定〔一〕重大行政决策的概念及范围的界定〔二〕重大行政决策程序的含义〔三〕地方重大行政决策程序法治化概念的内涵及基本要求〔四〕