GRE写作题库北美GRE写作

GRE写作题库范文北美GRE写作满分范文GRE写作题库范文北美GRE写作满分范文6/6GRE写作题库范文北美GRE写作满分范文2021年GRE写作题库范文：北美GRE写作总分值范文这样说来，OfficialGuide上的范文就弥足宝贵，不论6分的还5分、4分的都要认真剖析，特别是此中所给与的剖析和议论更是要细细体会，意会其精神，而后专心实践。GRE写作题库范文下边是一篇官方给出总分值的ARGUMENT范文，我们来一同赏析，看看它为什么能scoredsix(先读文章，再看我的议论)Thefollowingappearedaspartofanarticleinadailynewspaper："Mostcompanieswouldagreethatastheriskofphysicalinjuryoccurringonthejobincreases,thewagespaidtoemployeesshouldalsoincrease.Henceitmakesfinancialsenseforemployerstomaketheworkplacesafer：theycouldthusreducetheirpayrollexpensesandsavemoney."Discusshowwellreasonedyoufindthisargument.Inyourdiscussionbesuretoanalyzethelineofreasoningandtheuseofevidenceintheargument.Forexample,youmayneedtoconsiderwhatquestionableassumptionsunderliethethinkingandwhatalternativeexplanationsorcounterexamplesmightweakentheconclusion.Youcanalsodiscusswhatsortofevidencewouldstrengthenorrefutetheargument,whatchangesintheargumentwouldmakeitmorelogicallysound,andwhat,ifanything,wouldhelpyoubetterevaluateitsconclusion.GRE首段Thisargumentstatesthatitmakesfinancialsenseforemployerstomaketheworkplacesaferbecausebymakingtheworkplacesaferthenlowerwagescouldbepaidtoemployees.Thisconclusionisbasedonthepremisethatasthelistofphysicalinjuryincreases,thewagespaidtoemployeesshouldalsoincrease.However,thereareseveralassumptionsthatmaynotnecessarilyapplytothisargument.Forexample,thecostsassociatedwithmakingtheworkplacesafemustoutweightheincreasedpayrollexpensesduetohazardousconditions.Also,onemustlookattheplausabilityofimprovingtheworkenvironment.Andfinally,becausemostcompaniesagreethatastheriskofinjuryincreasessowillwagesdoesn'tnecessarilymeanthattheallcompanieswhichhavehazardousworkenvironmentsagree.GRE中间段1Thefirstissuetobeaddressediswhetherincreasedlaborcostsjustifylargecapitalexpenditurestoimprovetheworkenvironment.Clearlyonecouldarguethatifmakingtheworkplacesafewouldcostanexorbitantamountofmoneyincomparisontoleavingtheworkplaceasisandpayingslightlyincreasedwagesthanitwouldnotmakesensetoimprovetheworkenvironment.Forexample,ifmakingtheworkplacesafewouldcost$100millionversusadditionalpayrollexpensesofonly$5,000peryear,itwouldmakefinancialsensetosimplypaytheincreasedwages.Nobusinessorbusinessownerwithanysensewouldpayallthatextramoneyjusttosaveacoupledollarsandimproveemployeehealthandrelations.Toconsiderthis,acostbenefitanalysismustbemade.Ialsofeelthatalthoughacostbenefitanalysisshouldbethedeterminingfactorwithregardtothesedecisionsmakingfinancialsense,itmaynotbethedeterminingfactorwithregardtomakingsocial,moralandethicalsense.GRE中间段2Thisargumentalsoreliesontheideathatcompaniessolelyusefinancialsenseinanalysingimprovingtheworkenvironment.Thisisnotthecase.Companieslookatotherconsiderationssuchasthenegativesocialramificationsofhighon-jobinjuries.Forexample,Toyotaspendslargeamountsofmoneyimprovingitsenvironmentbecausewhileitsgoalistobeprofitable,italsopridesitselfonhighemployeemoraleandanalmostperfectlysafeworkenvironment.However,Toyotafindsthatitcandoboth,asbyimprovingemployeehealthandemployeerelationstheyareguaranteedamoremotivatedstaff,andhenceamoreefficientstaff;thisguaranteesmoremoneyforthebusinessaswellasmoresafetyfortheemployees.GRE中间段3Finallyonemustunderstandthatnotallworkenvironmentscanbemadesafer.Forexample,inthecaseofcoalmining,acompanyonlyhaslimitedwaysofmakingtheworkenvironmentsafe.Whilecompaniesmaybeabletoensuresomesafetyprecautions,theymaynotbeabletoprovideallthesafetymeasuresnecessary.Inotherwords,aminingcompanyhaslimitedabilitytocontroltheairqualitywithinacoalmineandthereforeitcannotcontroltheriskofemployeesgettingblacklung.Inotherwords,regardlessoftheintentofthecompany,somejobsaresimplydangerousinnature.GRE尾端Inconclusion,whileatfirstitmayseemtomakefinancialsensetoimprovethesafetyoftheworkenvironmentsometimesittrulydoesnotmakefinancialsense.Furthermore,financialsensemaynotbetheonlyissueacompanyfaces.Othertypesofanalysesmustbemadesuchasthesocialramificationsofanunsafeworkenvironmentandtheoverallabilityofacompanytoimprovethatenvironment(i.e。，coalmine)。Beforeanydecisionismade,allthisthingsmustbeconsidered,notsimplythereductionofpayrollexpenses.GRE这篇官方钦定总分值的范文，其最显然的长处在于：字数高达599words,GRE充分表达了字数为王的判分偏向。标准的五段制，首段、GRE尾端，中间三段，看上去很美。没有陈词滥调、GRE满篇空话的模板式语言。只有以上三点离总分值仍是很远的，GRE之因此SIX，我看更重要的在于，每段各尽其责，既独立又一致，形成了完好的ARGUMENT，specifically：首段再现了原IC的推理过程，GRE并指出其assumptions多有不适;特别令阅卷人快乐的是：首段在最后简化排列了推理中的三个问题。要知道美国人就喜爱的作文总分式，在首段就把三个ideas排列出来，而后在中间三段分别睁开，先总后分，了如指掌。中一的TS--“Thefirstissuetobeaddressediswhetherincreasedlaborcostsjustifylargecapitalexpenditurestoimprovetheworkenvironment.〞堪称是一针见血，一剑封喉。关于这样严重的推理破绽，假如不第一指出，其argument必定脆弱乏力。此所谓Topic中的“必削点〞，不行不察。3.中二的TS–“Thisargumentalsoreliesontheideathatcompaniessolelyusefinancialsenseinanalysingimprovingtheworkenvironment.〞但是走偏，独树一帜，出人所料。文章居然批了Topic以本理念，提出了要以人本，写是有必定，竟不是Issue。那本文是怎样化夷的呢?且看本段最后一句“thisguaranteesmoremoneyforthebusinessaswellasmoresafetyfortheemployees.〞我忍不住舒一口，人家再次回了，又回到了Topic中以“Money〞本的推理。4.中三的TS–“Finallyonemustunderstandthatnotallworkenvironmentscanbemadesafer.〞充分体了作者不但坐而道的arguer，而是关怀其可行性的主者，考到方案自己的可行性和限制性。5.尾端不只首段提出的点做出了重复性的，GRE并且又不其地把中三段的ideas一一列。这样“〞估令某些同学略有不，但恰好是美国人的最，culturalshock了吧?本文最令我欣的地方，GRE就是EXAMPLES的使用中段一，使用了“例〞GRE(假的状况)，$100million啦、$5,000了，很天真是吧?可美国人喜啊;咱中国的学生，特别是理工科的，喜用一些相当高妙的例子，有没有想那些卷老能看懂?特别是在极短内，他IQ又不高，知又不