诊断试验(英文)课件_第1页
诊断试验(英文)课件_第2页
诊断试验(英文)课件_第3页
诊断试验(英文)课件_第4页
诊断试验(英文)课件_第5页
已阅读5页,还剩44页未读 继续免费阅读

下载本文档

版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领

文档简介

1、诊断试验(英文)诊断试验(英文)Diagnostic test are not just about diagnosisScreeningDetermining severityOptimally therapyPrognosisMonitor Diagnostic test are not just aExampleCarotid ultrasound can tell you the severity of the patients carotid stenosis Carotid ultrasound can tell you the patients prognosis for str

2、oke and deathCarotid ultrasound can predict your patients likely responsiveness to therapyExampleCarotid ultrasound can Basic principles of conducting diagnostic studiesApply the gold standard to determine whether or not the target condition is present Gold standard: The most recognized standard for

3、 clinician to diagnose the target conditionPathological measurementOperation findingSpecial imaging detectionLong-term follow-up Recognized standardBasic principles of conductingWhat if your test is more gold than the standardMay lead to underestimate of the diagnostic power of the evaluatingOne str

4、ategy for dealing with this problem is to use long-term follow-up as a gold standardWhat if your test is more goldTo Whom Should the Gold Standard Be Applied?to everyoneselective performing the gold standard on patients may result in “ verification bias ” or “workup bias”To Whom Should the Gold Stan

5、daRecruit your participantsRecruit the target-negative and target-positive participants identified by gold standard characteristic of those to whom you will want to apply the test in clinical practiceIncluding a broad spectrum of the diseasedcase:from mildly to severelycontrol:a broad spectrum of co

6、mpeting conditionsAn alternative approach is that recruiting a consecutive sample of patientsRecruit your participantsRecru诊断试验(英文)诊断试验(英文)Measurement proceduresSpecifying test techniqueReproducibilityBlinding of the individual conducting or interpreting the test to the gold standardMeasurement proc

7、eduresSpecifyiSelect statistical procedureCalculating sample sizeSelect statistical procedureCa Example: Assuming a sensitivity of 80%, specificity of 60% of ultrasonography for diagnosis of cholecystolithiasis. How many samples are needed ? Example: Assuming a sensitiResult evaluation indexExample:

8、 126 patients underwent independent, blind BNP measurement and echocardiography for diagnosis of LVD.Result evaluation indexExample诊断试验(英文)sensitivity:a/(a+c)=35/40=0.88, or 88%specificity:d/(b+d)=29/86=0.34, or 34%positive predictive value (PPV):a/(a+b)=35/92=0.38, or 38%negative predictive value (

9、NPV):d/(c+d)=29/34=0.85, or 85%prevalence: (a+c) / (a+b+c+d)=40/126=0.32, or 32%Pre-test odds: pre-test probability/(1- pre-test probability) =32% / 68%=0.47positive likelihood ratio ( LR+ ): Sen/1-Spe=88% /(100%-34%)=1.3sensitivity:a/(a+c)=35/40=0.88诊断试验(英文)Multilevel likelihood ratiosMultilevel li

10、kelihood ratiosStability of the indexStable : Sen, SpeRelatively stable: LR+, LR- Unstable : PPV, NPV, prevalence:Stability of the indexStable :Receiver operating characteristic curves(ROC)It illustrates the performance of a diagnostic test when you select different cut-points to distinguish “normal

11、” from “abnormal” It demonstrates the fact that any increase in sensitivity will be accompanied by a decrease in specificityThe closer the curve gets to the upper left corner of the display, the more the overall accuracy of the testThe closer the curve comes to the 45-degree diagonal of the ROC spac

12、e ,the less accurate the testThe area under the curve provides an overall measure of a tests accuracyReceiver operating characteris Fig A ROC for BNP as a diagnostic test for LVD Fig A ROC for诊断试验(英文)Parallel test A test B test Result + + + + + + + -Parallel test A test Reduction miss diagnosisExclu

13、de some disease When prevalence is low, as the primary screening methodReduction miss diagnosisSerial test A test B test Result + + + + - + - -Serial test A test Sen = Sen A SenBSpe = Spe A + (1-Spe A) Spe BMisdiagnosis may cause nuisance effect Confirmatory diagnosis Sen = Sen A SenBSpe = Spe A Ser

14、ial test with enzyme labeled compound assay for diagnosis of myocardial infarctionEnzyme labeled compound assaySenSpeCPK9657SGOT9174LDH879191Serial test with enzyme labelMultivariate analysisSEN SPEMultivariate analysisSEN single variable analysismarkermethodsSEN (%)spe (%)cutoffAREAaELISA90.788.80.

15、19150.926bELISA77.373.20.20350.802cELISA74.270.90.09050.762dELISA78.481.61.080.836eELISA90.784.40.3560.932fELISA84.581.60.7990.899 single variable analysismarkemultivariate analysis using logistic regression Combined markersSEN()SPE()AREAa and b88.882.50.926a and c87.782.50.927a and e91.690.070.974a

16、 and f95.590.070.967a and d87.285.6.0936b and c78.876.30.837b and d87.786.60.934b and e83.882.50.900b and f82.781.40.863C and d87.785.60.946C and e88.385.60.926C and f81.679.40.854d and e89.486.60.946d and f88.386.60.952e and f87.785.60.933multivariate analysis using loPrediction the probability of

17、a diseaseLogit(P)= -0.934+4.797 x a +2.203 x ePrediction the probability of Avoiding overfitting Overfitting occurs when a computer model identifies a “chance” pattern that discriminates cancer patients from non-cancer patients, perfectly fitting that dataset but not reproducible in other data sets.

18、One way to avoiding overfitting is to randomly split the data into separate training and test samples.Avoiding overfitting OverfThe EBM steps for diagnostic testsLooking for the most suitable study papers according to the clinical questionBring forward the question in clinicExample 2 : if detection

19、of serum forritin can diagnose Iron deficiency anemia?Search the computer information using the apposite key word“diagnose Iron deficiency anemia” and “diagnostic test” and “human”The EBM steps for diagnostic tEvaluation of the scientificity of the papersIf compared with the gold standard independen

20、tly and blindlyExample 2: Iron stain with myeloid biopsyEvaluation of the scientificitIf detected with the control test for every quizzeeGold standardTotal (No.)Results+-New diagnostic test +351550sensitivity=46%New diagnostic test -40460500specificity=96.8%If detected with the control Verification

21、biasGold standardTotal (No.)Results+-New diagnostic test +3515 50sensitivity=90%New diagnostic test -446 50specificity=75%Verification biasGold standardIf the patient samples included a broad spectrum of the diseaseIf the disease spectrum uniform Whats the objective question that the investigator co

22、ncerned aboutIf the study sample and the quizzee is uniformSpectrum bias:overstate the performance parameter of the diagnostic test because of excluding the “grey zone” patientsIf the patient samples includeThe precision of the diagnostic tests Definition: in the same condition, degree of stability

23、of achieving the same result when repeating the operation Detailed introduction the procedurestandards of reporting diagnostic accuracy, STARDThe precision of the diagnostiEstimate the significance of clinical applicationEstimate the pre-test probabilityPre-test probability:Estimating the suffering

24、probability before diagnostic testMedical recordMedical examination Individual experience Epidemiology dataEstimate the significance of cThe predictive value depend on the pre-test probability of illnessThe predictive value depend onExplain and use of sensitivity and specificityHigh sensitivity test

25、 (negative test, rule out)High specificity test (positive test, rule in )Explain and use of sensitivityUse likelihood ratio, LRLikelihood ratio: provides a direct estimate of how much a test result will change the probability of having a diseaseLR+ = sensitivity/(1- specificity)Likelihood ratio unch

26、anged with the prevalence rate Overcoming deficiency with only sensitivity or specificity to expressUse likelihood ratio, LRLikelipost-test probability post-test probability = post-test odds / (1 + post-test odds )post-test odds = pre-test odds LR pre-test odds = pre-test probability (1- pre-test pr

27、obability )Crude principle: LR 10 or 0.1 affirm or denial 5 LR 10 or 0.1 LR 0.2 moderate probability 2 LR 5 or 0.2 LR 0.5 minor probability 1 LR 2 or 0.5 LR 100 81080.13denial45-100 7270.45minor probability18-45 23133.10moderate probability=18 47242.5 affirmTotal 85150The LR with serum ferritin forThe LR with serum ferritin for diagnosis of iron-deficiency anemiaThe LR with serum ferritin

温馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
  • 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
  • 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
  • 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
  • 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

评论

0/150

提交评论