伴有C型腰弯的特发性青少年脊柱侧凸的选择性胸椎融合:钩与椎弓根螺钉比较课件_第1页
伴有C型腰弯的特发性青少年脊柱侧凸的选择性胸椎融合:钩与椎弓根螺钉比较课件_第2页
伴有C型腰弯的特发性青少年脊柱侧凸的选择性胸椎融合:钩与椎弓根螺钉比较课件_第3页
伴有C型腰弯的特发性青少年脊柱侧凸的选择性胸椎融合:钩与椎弓根螺钉比较课件_第4页
伴有C型腰弯的特发性青少年脊柱侧凸的选择性胸椎融合:钩与椎弓根螺钉比较课件_第5页
已阅读5页,还剩11页未读 继续免费阅读

下载本文档

版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领

文档简介

1、Selective Thoracic Fusion For AIS With Lumbar “C” Modifier Curves: Comparison of Hooks Versus Pedicle ScrewsIntroductionClassification schemes for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis have attempted to identify patients with major thoracic and compensatory lumbar curves that are amenable to selective tho

2、racic fusion in order to preserve lumbar motion segments. Improper patient selection may lead to postoperative coronal decompensation (C7 plumb line deviation from CSVL). IntroductionAdolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A new classification to determine extent of spinal arthrodesis. Lenke L, Betz R, Har

3、ms J, Bridwell K, Clements D, Lowe T, Blanke K.; JBJS 2001:83A, 1169-1181Lenke “C” curves (lumbar apical vertebra translated lateral to CSVL) are considered greatest risk of postoperative coronal decompensationIntroductionRecent study has reported success with selective thoracic fusion in 44 patient

4、s with Lenke “C” curvesCorrection of apical translation was inconsistent: some remained “C” type curves while others corrected to “A” or “B” Preoperative global imbalance was a predictor of postoperative imbalanceSelective thoracic fusion for AIS with “C” lumbar modifier curves: 2-16 year radiograph

5、ic and clinical results. Dobbs, MB, Edwards CC, Lenke LG, Peelle MW, Sides B, Rinella A, Bridwell KH. Spine 2004; 29(5):536-546.COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF PEDICLE SCREW VS HOOK INSTRUMENTATION IN POSTERIOR SPINAL FUSION OF ADOLESCENT IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS:A Matched Cohort AnalysisYongjung J. Kim, MD Law

6、rence G. Lenke, MDSamuel K. Cho, MD Keith H. Bridwell, MDSpinal Deformity ServiceWashington University School of MedicineSt. Louis Shriners HospitalSt. Louis, MissouriSRS 2003/AAOS 2004/POSNA 2004/Spine, SRS issue 29S(18):2040-2058, 2004 METHODSWell Matched Cohorts Op.Methods# ofFused VBLenke CurveT

7、ypeAge at SurgeryTPSN=26PSF+TPL 18PSF+ICBG 4PSF+Ant BG 411.7 Type 1: 14 Type 2: 7Type 3: 1Type 4: 2Type 6: 214.8YHookN=26PSF+TPL 18PSF+ICBG 4PSF+Ant BG 411.7 Type 1: 14Type 2: 7Type 3: 1Type 4: 2Type 6: 214.2Y Apples to Apples Comparison RESULTSComparison of Coronal Plane Change 1 Major Cobb Angle C

8、hange (Overall p value0.0001)(degree)IntroductionAnother study suggested the correction of the thoracic curve should mimic the push-prone radiograph Perhaps aggressive curve correction with pedicle screws may be contra-indicatedDobbs MB, Lenke LG, Corley CL, Bridwell KH, Peelle MW, Steger-May K. Can

9、 We Predict the Ultimate Lumbar Curve in Adolescent Idiopathic Patients Undergoing a Selective Fusion With Undercorrection of the Thoracic Curve? Spine 2004; 29(3):227-85.4121Push/Prone1 year post opC7 4330PurposeTo compare the results of selective posterior thoracic fusion using an all hook constru

10、ct versus an all pedicle screw construct in AIS major thoracic (Lenke 1C & 2C) curve types.Determine if the use of pedicle screws resulted in overcorrection of the thoracic curve and hence increased risk of lumbar Cobb decompensation.Methods66 consecutive AIS patients treated by two surgeons at a si

11、ngle institution from 1987-2001. All underwent selective thoracic fusions for Lenke 1C and Lenke 2C (major thoracic) curvesLowest instrumented vertebra T12 (30), L1 (36)Local bone and iliac crest graftComprehensive radiographic evaluationResultsHookPedicleScrewSignificanceAge (yrs)13.913.8NS% female

12、7879NSRisser2.11.9NSFollow-up(yrs)10 (2-12)6 (2-8)NS (p=.36)Results Preoperative CobbCobb angle (degrees)Thoracic MeasurementsLumbar Measurementsp=.74 p=.54 p=.63 p=.59 p=.47 p=.83 No difference in hook vs. pedicle screw groups in preoperative static or bending Cobb measurementsResults Thoracic Corr

13、ectionPedicle screw correction greater than hook correction ( 44% vs. 33% ) (p0.004)p=0.74 p0.004Results Lumbar CorrectionPedicle screw correction greater than hook correction ( 38% vs. 32% ) (p0.005)p=0.59 p 2cm) was higher in the hook group (13 patients) as compared to the pedicle screw group (4 patients) The lowest instrumented vertebrae was on average 1 level shorter for the pedicle screw group (p0.001).ConclusionsOur study demonstrated that pedicle screw fixation has the following advantages over hook constructs in AI

温馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
  • 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
  • 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
  • 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
  • 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

评论

0/150

提交评论