国际私法第三章

1、第三章第三章 国际私法的渊源国际私法的渊源Sources of PILSources of PIL 2-1 国内立法 Domestic Legislation 2-1-1 三种主要模式 Three main Models 2-1-2 四个新的发展Four New Developments 形式法典化 Codification 范围扩大化 Enlargement 规则灵活化 Soften 政策定向和结果选择方法 Policy-oriented and Result-selecting2-2 司法判例Judicial Precedence2-2-1 司法判例的渊源地位 the Status of

2、Judicial precedence2-2-2 司法判例在我国的地位 Judicial Precedence in Chinas Legal System2-2-3 学说或法理作为国际私法渊源的问题 Doctrine or General Principles of Law2-3 国际条约International Convention 2-3-1 国际条约中的国际私法 PIL Rules in International Conventions 2-3-2 有关的重要国际组织 Some International Organizations 2-3-3 国际私法条约在我国的适用 the a

3、pplication of PIL conventions in China2-4 国际惯例International Usage 2-4-1 国际惯例的概念 Definition of International Usage 2-4-2 国际惯例的识别和查明 Qualification and ascertainment of international usage 2-4-3 国际惯例在我国的适用 the application of international usage in China国际统一实体法冲突规范内国民商法外国民商法国际民商事关系冲突规范与国际统一实体法调整国际民商事关系示

4、意图指定适用程序法问题实体法问题冲突规范、统一实体法规范和国际民事诉讼程序规范解决国际私法案件示意图指定适用冲突规范内国民商法外国民商法国际统一实体法规范国际民事诉讼程序规范 The three most important sources of the English conflict of law are statutes, the decisions of the courts and the opinions of jurists. Statutes are placed first in this list ( and not second as they were in the f

5、irst edition of this book) because there can be no doubt that they have become the most important source, and their important seems likely to increase rather than to diminish in future. Until the middle of the twentieth century. Parliamentary intervention in the conflict of laws was haphazard(compar

6、ed with the mass of case law) slight and unimportant. Statutes were occasionally passed to remedy glaring anomaly or injustice. To facilitate the reciprocal enforcement of judgments within the United Kingdom or the Commonwealth or with such foreign states as were prepared to offer reciprocal treatme

7、nt, or (on one occasion only) to codify a very small part of the subject. But since the middle of the twentieth century there has been an increasing spate of statutes implementing some international convention, and a few very important ones prepared by the Law Commission as part of a thoroughgoing a

8、nd well considered reform of the law.案例案例 3-1 中国公司中国公司 A诉美国诉美国 UPS 航航空快递延误赔偿案空快递延误赔偿案 A为了参加也门共和国一个工程的投标，于1993年7月20日上午电话通知UPS业务员，表明21日需快递投标书到也门。21日16时45分，A将填好的UPS公司运单交给UPS业务员，由于UPS公司运单中货品性质填写不当，UPS也没有问清是否送达的额外要求，没有在当天下午送上海机场报关，直到7月23日晚才办完投标书的出境手续。因此，投标书直到7月27日才到目的地，错过了26日投标截止日期。 A向上海市某法院起诉，要求UPS退回运输费1432元人民币，赔偿直接经济损失10360美圆，承担诉讼费用。(国际快运的合理期限为4-7天)。案例案例3-2 中国某土产公司与新加坡某中国某土产公司与新加坡某公司纠纷案公司纠纷案中国某土产公司向新加坡出口红枣，国外来证中国某土产公司向新加坡出口红枣，国外来证规定为规定为3级品质，交货时，因为存货不足，改装级品质，交货时，因为存货不足，改装2级货，并在发票上注明：级货，并在发票上注明：“二级红枣，价格照二级红枣，价格照旧，还是按三级货计收。旧，还是按三级货计收。”交货后，开证银行交货后，开证银行拒绝付