认知语言学论文认知语言学 诗歌隐喻 概念整合理论 翻译整合网

1、认知语言学论文：从认知视角论诗歌隐喻的翻译【中文摘要】”散文是井然有序的文字,诗是巧然成序的绝妙好词。”英国诗人柯勒律治的这句评论充分体现了诗歌作为最重要的文学形式,所具有的独特价值。然而,美国诗人弗罗斯特却说:“诗就是在翻译中所丧失的东西。”这句话不但道出了诗歌翻译之艰难,也成为了诗歌不可译观点的代表。自国际交流产生以来,人们从未停止过对诗歌的译入和译出,这个事实使诗歌不可译论不攻自破。真正的诗是属于全世界的,它自身散发的光芒吸引着译者们去翻译它、传播它。诚然,在翻译的过程中,随着语言形式的转变,一首诗原有的声音、韵律和节奏等诗歌所特有的音乐性元素很难在译文中幸存,这是每一位诗歌译者不得不面

2、对的宿命,也就是弗罗斯特所说的“丧失的东西”。接受这一宿命的诗歌译者们唯有尽力将诗意传递。诗人往往通过在诗歌中使用隐喻性语言反映其对世界的认识,表达某种情感。传统的隐喻研究认为隐喻是一种修辞方法、一种意义转移的表达方式。认知语言学的出现,改变了人们对隐喻的成见。认知语言学家认为,隐喻是以具象的事件或经验来理解和体验抽象的事件或经验,隐喻是人类普遍的认知方式和思维方式。诗人取道隐喻,是在传达其他途径无法言说的东西。因此,同样作为诗歌的一项基本元素隐喻的翻译,决定着一首诗精.【英文摘要】”Prose is words in their best order; poetry is the best

3、words in their best order.”Coleridges remark demonstrates the unique value of poetry as the most important literary genre. However, by contending“poetry is what gets lost in translation”, Frost represents an opinion that poetry is untranslatable. This is true in a sense that every poem is the unity

4、of form and meaning, with linguistic transformation, certain poetic elements such as sound, meter and rhythm, inevitably get lost in translation. Then how .【关键词】认知语言学 诗歌隐喻 概念整合理论 翻译整合网络 概念结构 异化与归化【英文关键词】cognitive linguistics poetic metaphor conceptual integration theory blending network of translati

5、on conceptual structure foreignization and domestication【索购全文】联系Q1：138113721 Q2：139938848【目录】从认知视角论诗歌隐喻的翻译Abstract5-6摘要7-11Chapter 1 Introduction11-151.1 Research Background and Significance11-131.2 Methodology and Organization of the Thesis13-15Chapter 2 About Poetic Metaphor15-272.1 On Metaphor15-

6、18 The Aristotelian View on Metaphor15-16 The Cognitive Approach to Metaphor16-182.2 On Poetic Metaphor18-23 Defining Poetic Metaphor18-21 The Function of Poetic Metaphor21 The Attributes of Poetic Metaphor21-232.3 On Translation of Poetic Metaphor23-27revious Studies on Translation of Metaphor23-25

7、 Main Conflicts in Translation of Poetic Metaphor: Originality vs. Culture25-27Chapter 3 Conceptual Integration View on Translation27-333.1 Theory of Conceptual Integration Network27-293.2 Conceptual Blending Network of Translation29-303.3 Conceptual Structure30-33Chapter 4 Blending Network of Trans

8、lation Specified for Poetic Metaphor33-474.1 Input Space 1: Two Levels of Meaning of the Source Text33-38 The Micro Level of Meaning33-36 The Macro Level of Meaning36-384.2 Input Space 2：TranslatorMental Space38-394.3 Generic Space: A Trade-off between Structures39-414.4 Running the Blend41-434.5 Bl

9、end：Emergent Structure43-47Chapter 5 Comparative Study of Auguries of Innocence and Xiangchou (Nostalgia)47-655.1 Study of Auguries of Innocence47-56 Different Blends48-50 Generic Space: the Problem Pinpointed50-51 Micro Level: Performances in Copying the Conceptual Structures51-52 Macro Level: the Themes Derived52-55 Summary55-565.2 Study of Xiangchou (Nostalgia)56-65 Different Blends57-59 Micro Level: Performances in Copying the Conceptual Structures59-60 Generic Space: the Problem Pinpointed60-62 Macro Level: Performances Compared in Communicating Em