隐名股东论文：隐名股东名义股东股东地位

1、隐名股东论文：隐名股东 名义股东 股东地位【中文摘要】隐名股东，作为一种现实经济生活中颇为常见的投 资方式,在我国市场经济发展和商事法律兴旺的今天，此种现象有增 无减，由其引发的纠纷亦愈来愈多，传统的合同法、物权法和公司法已 不足以对此进行规范和保护。隐名股东的概念及其地位问题，是解决隐名股东问题的基础和关键，而迄今为止，立法未对此问题作出明确 的规定,学界亦无成型理论及学说，以至于实务界在面临此类法律纠 纷时处于无法可据、无理可依的境地。最高人民法院关于适用（中华 人民共和国公司法）若干问题的规定（三）（法释3号以下简称解释 （三）于2011年2月16日公布施行，其中有关“实际出资人”的条款

2、 亦应适用于隐名股东，可以作为隐名股东纠纷解决的依据，然而我们 也意识到，解释三的出台并未对隐名股东问题进行根本上的解决， 解释三的法律效果乃至社会效果有待进一步观察，同时，解释三 本身亦存在不少漏洞，这在一定程度上影响了其效果的发挥。因此， 对隐名股东问题的理论研究未因解释三的发布而走向终点 ，而是 刚刚走到一个新起点。本文基于这一观点，在解释三颁布不久， 归纳总结时下较为通行的理论及立法例，以“隐名股东的概念及其地 位”为题撰写了此篇论文。全文共分四个部分对隐名股东的概念及其 地位问题进行系统地分析和研究。 本文第一部分：本部分首先从比较 法学的角度出发，分析了隐名股东在不同法域国家中的存

3、在，指出隐 名股东这一投资模式并不符合各国的立法潮流，其他国家鲜有此立法 例；分析隐名股东在我国的立法现状，指出隐名股东理论和立法上的缺失给实务界所带来的困扰；最后在列举和分析学界关于隐名股东各 学说的基础上，界定本文所指称“隐名股东”的定义、特征及其类型。 本文第二部分：本部分首先对隐名股东这一投资模式在经济生活中的 纠纷形式进行列举，指出这一模式利益关系复杂，交易成本和风险较 大。其后对隐名股东与其他关系人的法律关系进行深入剖析，明确各 自的权利义务及其纠纷处理。本文第三部分：本部分主要在商法原则 层面,对隐名股东这一投资模式进行价值分析。商事法的原则是商事 立法的统率和指导，隐名股东模式

4、在交易迅捷原则下，具有反效率性； 在企业维持原则下，具有不稳定因素；在交易安全原则下，不利于对第 三人的保护；而在私法自治原则下，为从商自由理念所允许和支持。 本文第四部分：本部分首先对学界颇具影响的隐名股东立法理论一一 股权信托制度进行评论，指出我国引入该制度，并以此来规范隐名股 东模式,保护有关当事人权益的可行性；其后对解释三相关法条 进行评述,指出解释三在处理隐名股东问题上的进展与不足。【英文摘要】 Dorma nt shareholders, as a fairly com mon wayto inv est in real econo mic life, this phe nomen

5、on in creases in our market economy and thriving commercial law today, and it is also an increasing number of disputes arising. Traditional con tract law, property law and compa ny law have bee n in sufficie nt to regulate and protect these acts. The con cept and the status of dormant shareholders i

6、s the basis and key of soluti on to dorma nt shareholder issues. Un til no w, legislati ondoes not explicitly provide for this issue, and scholars have not developed the theory and doctrine, resulting in the face of practitioners at the time of this dispute can be no legal basis, no theory can be ba

7、sed on the situation.” SupremePeople s Court on the application Provisions on Several Issues (c)“ (Supreme (2011) 3, here in after referred to asin terpretati on (c) promulgated on February 16,2011. One on“the actual investor ” provisions should also apply to dormant shareholders, and they can be as

8、 an implicit shareholder basis for dispute resolution. However, we also realize that, the emerge nee of in terpretati on皿” can n ot fun dame ntally solvethe problem of dormant shareholders. The social effects as well as the legal effect require further observati on. At the same time, “interpretation

9、皿” itselfhas manyloopholes, which tosome exte nt, affected the play of its effect. Therefore, theoretical study of dorma nt shareholders not because the“ interpretation of the three” comes towards the end, justwent to a new starting point. Based on this view, in the“ interpretation皿” issued soon, th

10、is article Summarizes theprevailingtheory nowadays more and enactment of legislation,to “ The con cept and the status of dorma nt shareholders analysis ” as the title of this thesis.Paper is divided intofour parts to systematically analyzed and studied the issue of dormant shareholders.The first par

11、t:This section first from the perspective of comparative law, an alyzed the existe nee of Dormant shareholders in differentnational jurisdictions, andpointed out the investment model that does not comply with the trend of n ati on al legislati on, and few other coun tries have such legislationcases;

12、 analysis of the legislativesituationin China, pointed out that the lack of legislation and theory brings practiti oners of the troubled sector. Fin ally, on the basis of the enu meratio n and an alysis of releva nt theories, this article defines the definition, the characteristics and the classific

13、atio n of dorma nt shareholders.The sec ond part:This secti on first lists the inv estme nt patter ns of dormant shareholders disputes in economic life, and pointed out that the interests of this model complex, transaction costs and higher risk. Subseque nt in-depth an alysis of the dorma nt shareho

14、lders and other pers ons of the legal relatio nship, define their respective rights and obligations and dispute resolution.The third part:This part mainly on the level ofprinciple in commercial law, value the existenee of this model of dormant shareholder. The principle of commercial law is the comm

15、a nd and guida nee of commercial legislatio n. From theperspective of the prin ciple of trad ing quick, dorma nt shareholder model is not efficient.From the perspective of theprinciple of enterprises to maintain, dormant shareholder model is unstable form. From the perspective of the principles of t

16、ran sacti on security, dorma nt shareholder model is not conducive to the protectionof third party. Under the principleof aut onomy in private law, this mode is allowed from the bus in ess idea of freedom and support.The fourth part:This section first reviews the equity trust system, which has great

17、 in flue nce in academic circles. Need to in troduce this system in our country, and thus to regulate the dormant shareholders mode and protect the in terests of the parties concern ed.Subseque nt “ in terpretati on of the three ” releva nt articles were reviewed, and poin ted out the progress and d

18、eficie ncies of “ in terpretatio n皿” in deali ng with the issue of dorma ntshareholder.【关键词】隐名股东名义股东 股东地位【英文关键词】dorma nt shareholdersNomi nalshareholders shareholder status【目录】隐名股东的概念及其地位分析内容摘要 4-6Abstract6-7 引言9-10 一、隐名股东的神秘面纱10-27( )隐名股东在不同法系 国家中的存在10-141.隐名股东在英美法国家的存在10-112.隐名 股东在大陆法系国家的存在113.隐名股东在我国的存在11-14（二） 法学界对隐名股东的研究现状14-271.关于隐名股东的学说14-162. 关于隐名股东的定义16-223.关于隐名股东的特征22-254.关于隐 名股东的类型25-27二、隐名股东与其他关系人27-36（ 一）隐名股 东与名义股东之间的关系28-30（二）隐名股东、名义股东与公司的 关系30-33（三）隐名股东、名义股东与公