风险管理(英文版

1、Risk Assessment Part 1:Assessment with existing control measuresAActivity (or area) being assessed: Dytel/Moore Vernon GaugesBusiness: TURBINE SYSTEMSDIMENSIONALPeopleRolls-Royce:8 Frequency/duration: 8hs 3shftsDepartment:affected:Dept. no.:2225Others:0 Frequency/duration: N/ALocation: PCFBAssessmen

2、t ref. no. Date of assessment:31/03/04Assessor(s)/team: Q Periodic reviews maximum C intervals for activities with:Medium risk (but ALARP) - annuallyLow risk - three-yearlyst1 ReviewDate: 31/03/E05Name:Signed:2nd ReviewDate:Name:Signed:3 ReviewDate: G Name:Signed:4 ReviewDate: H JName:Signed:DHazard

3、(potential for harm)Hazardous event(what happens)Foreseeable cause (cause of hazardous event)F Consequence(outcome)Existing control measures usedProbability1 to 5Risk1 to 25Details of harmValue1 to 5Example:Working at heightFall from ladderLoss of balanceBroken limbs3Ladder in good condition, at cor

4、rect angle and tied off39 medium1Trapped HandFixture closing on componentsUnsafe working practicesBroken fingers1Safeprocedures,Machineintegrated12Hazard(potential for harm)Hazardous event(what happens)Foreseeable cause (cause of hazardous event)F Consequence (outcome)Existing control measures usedP

5、robability1 to 5Risk1 to 25Details of harmValue1 to 52Operation ofmachineRSIContinuous loading & unloading of componentsWrist & backache2Intermittent breaks363Visual imparementExamining results on display screensContinuous use of DSEGradual deteration of eyesight3DSE legislation, not a continuous pr

6、ocess26Area is ppe4NoiseGeneral factory noiseFinish area extraction & machine noiseGradual hearing impairment3controlled & hearing protection must be26wornC5Physical injuryDropping of tooling fixturesEunsafe working practicesBruises & abrasions, possible broken fingers1GOperator trainingH1J26Hand he

7、ld tooling vibrationVibration white finger from moving partsContinuous use of air toolsVibration white finger2Annual monitoring OHD26Risk Assessment Part 2:Proposed actions(risk reduction measures)Example (continued):Use tower scaffold or hydraulicaccess platformbut rememberto consider additional ha

8、zardsso consider whether an1ynewExpected risk aftercompletion of actionsConsequenceProbabilityRiskRe-assess r4isks to show how proposed Noise reduction plan inactions will be effective in reducing the risk. progress5hazards will be introduced .6 Better Hand toolingAssessment of risk reduction action

9、sI confirm that the proposed actions haveActualbeen completed and that the expectedPlanned actioncompletion datecompletiondate61/1/200125/12/2000medConsequenceProbabilityIncredibleImprobableOccasionalProbableFrequentExtremelyUnlikely butLikely toLikely toRegular orPeopleAssetsEnvironmentReputationun

10、likely tomay occuroccur someoccurcontinuousever occurexceptionallytimeoftenoccurrence12345risk reduction has been achievedNameJ. BloggsSignatureJoe BloggsDate26/12/2000Lead AssessorAccountableManagerSignedRName(print)PositionMultiple fatalitie sExtensivedamageSignificantharm*Internationalimpact5Sing

11、le fatalityMajor damageModerate, long-term harm*Nationalimpact4Major injuryLocaliseddamageModerate, short-term harm*Considerable impact3Lost time injuryMinor damageLow impact, little harm*LimitedImpact2First aid injuryNo damageNo impact*No Impact1MediumLowHighRefer to “Environmental Aspects and Impa

12、cts Assessment methodology and EnvAID user s guide ” for explanation of envir onmental probability andconsequencecategories.Guidance on Completion of Risk Assessment FormBox/ColumnExplanation (for detailed guidance refer to risk assessment guidance document)AProvide details of the activity being ass

13、essed and the business and department to which it relates. Where the risk assessment is generic it should be clearly stated.Indicate the people who could be affected (including contractors and the public) and the frequency and duration of exposure precise details are not required.BA unique reference

14、 number should be allocated to the assessment, and the date of the initial assessment and the main parties involved should be recorded.CHazard: The hazard is the thing with the potential for harm, such as a flammablesubstance, rotating machine or deep water. Record all of the significant hazards ass

15、ociated with the activity being assessed. Ignore any trivial hazard.The form provides space for listing six hazardous events . outcomes) if more areneeded, continue on an additional sheet.Although the risk assessment matrix covers risks to people, assets, environment andreputation, each of these ris

16、k areas should be considered separately, . consider environmental hazards independently.DHazardous Event: Give a very brief description of the hazard scenario or event .what happens that could lead to harm.EForeseeable cause: Record the plausible causes of each hazard being released or the foreseeab

17、le causes of exposure to the hazards. how the substance is released, how a person becomes trapped in a dangerous machine, how a person comes into contact with deep water.FConsequence: This column is divided into two parts. The first gives brief detailsof the outcome of the hazardous event, whilst th

18、e second part records the value associated with the harm, taken from the risk matrix. Clearly the description of the harm should relate to the appropriate category in the matrix.First aid injury: local first aid treatment received but no significant lost time.Lost time injury : off-site medical trea

19、tment or short-term lost time . days).Major injury : immediate major trauma long-term lost time . weeks)It is important to be realistic is considering consequence, and although unlikelyevents should be considered, they should nevertheless be plausible. there is more than one plausible outcome from a

20、 hazardous event, each will need to be considered separately.Taken together, columns C to F should provide an understanding event being considered.Note that ifof thehazardousGExisting Control Measures:The presence of any existing control measures may reduceboth the probability of an incident occurri

21、ng and the scale of the consequences, andshould be recorded to ensure that they are taken into account by the risk assessmentand not overlooked.This record of control measures will also be useful when preparinga written safesystem of work, which should draw from the risk assessment.Any control measu

22、res specified should be those that are actually used, and should beadequate for the purpose and regularly reviewed to ensure that they continue to bemaintained as effective controls. If there is doubt about thegenuineusage oreffectiveness of a control measure it should not be included asa riskreduct

23、ionmeasure.HProbability: Using judgement based on experience and historical evidence,estimatethe probability of each hazardous event occurring using the categories given in therisk matrix. In considering the probability account should be taken of the controlmeasures that are in place providing that

24、they are genuinely used and of benefit.If in doubt about which category to select, err on the side ofcaution.Furtherguidance on the selection of probability categories relates to theassessmentteams experience, as follows:Incredible : No one in the team/workgroup has heard of thisoccurringin theindus

25、try.Improbable : One person in the team/workgroup knows of someone who has experiencedthis.Occasional : One person in the team/workgroup has experienced this at least once inthe last two years.Probable : All persons in the team/workgroup experience this at least once a year.Frequent : All persons in

26、 the team/workgroup experience this more often than not when doing this activity.JRisk: The value of risk is determined by combining (multiplying) the values sexedfor consequence and probability for a given hazardous event. The risk matrixfacilitates this and results in one of three risk categories

27、being selected, . High,Medium or Low.KProposed Actions:The tolerability of the risk assessed in column H will determinewhether further actions are required for risk reduction.High risks cannot be tolerated under any circumstances and will require immediateaction to reduce the level of risk to as low

28、 as reasonably practicable .Ifnecessary this may require temporary suspension of an activity or the installationof temporary control measures.Medium risks - judgement will need to be made on the urgency of further action toreduce the risk to a level that is as low as reasonably practicable . Inspeci

29、fying actions for further control measures, consider both immediate (interim)actions and long-term (permanent) solutions.Low risks are broadly tolerable but should be kept under review and reduced furtherwherever reasonably practicable. However the principle of continuous improvementshould be employ

30、ed to continue to drive down risk where economically valid.In deciding what action to take to reduce risks a hierarchical approach should betaken, further details of which are given in Section of the main document.LExpected risk after completion of actions: Once actions have been selected therisks s

31、hould be reassessed to ensure that the required risk reduction will beachieved, . that the revised level of risk is tolerable. If it is not, alternativeor additional actions will be required.Note that actions intended to reduce risks may also introduce further hazards andtherefore risks it is theref

32、ore important to consider any additional hazards inthe reassessment.MPlanned action completion date: When a satisfactory means of risk reduction hasbeen determined through appropriate actions, it is important that they are actuallycarried out to an acceptable timescale. The planned completion date w

33、ill need to becarefully considered, and if the activity is allowed to proceed in the additional precautions may need to be put in place temporarily.meantime,N/PActual completion date and confirmation of completion:When a risk reduction actionhas been completed, the date should be recorded and the ac

34、tion signed-off. This isan important part of the process as any actionsnot enforced will render theriskassessment useless. The sign-off will also provide an auditable record.If the initial risk assessment for a given hazard has concluded that no additionalactions are necessary, columns L, M, N and P

35、 will not need to becompleted.Temporary control measures need to be in place before the activity begins.QPeriodic reviews:The completed risk assessment should be reviewed periodically toensure that it remains up-to-date and relevant to the activity.Maximum intervals for review relates to the level o

36、f residual risk associated withthe activity, and are as follows:Medium Risk (which have been justified as ALARP) annuallyLow Risk every 3 years.Clearly high risks are not tolerable and so activities will not have a high residualrisk.In addition to periodic reviews, risk assessments should be revisit

37、ed:whenever significant changes in circumstances occur (including changes to theoperation of the activity or in light of new legislationandotherrequirements);following any incident.RSign-off: On completion of the risk assessment the form should be signed-off by theassessor and by the manager who is accountable for the working activityorareawhich has been assessed. Sign-off may be before box P is signed to verifythatactions have been completed.Indicat