外文翻译无形资产计量_第1页
外文翻译无形资产计量_第2页
外文翻译无形资产计量_第3页
外文翻译无形资产计量_第4页
外文翻译无形资产计量_第5页
已阅读5页,还剩17页未读 继续免费阅读

下载本文档

版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领

文档简介

1、外文翻译-无形资产计量 本科毕业论文(设计)外 文 翻 译外文题目 intangible asset measurement 外文出处 accountants today 外文作者 bernard marr 原文:intangible asset measurementbernard marrin order to keep tabs on how your organizations intellectual capital is performing, you must ask all the right questions. bernard marr explains.its impos

2、sible to navigate a business to success without the necessary performance information to guide your strategic decision-making. it would be a bit like driving your car blindfolded: you cant see where youre going and you cant see your instruments to check your speed. the problem is that, when it comes

3、 to the invisible assets in our businesses, this is the scenario we are facing. we lack meaningful performance indicators for tangibles such as the information an organization holds, its image and reputation, its core expertise or its customer relationships. all of them can be vital to the businesss

4、 current and future performance, but, if we havent got relevant performance information, we cant adequately measure them. collectively, these intangible assets are referred to as intellectual capital.research has confirmed that, although most executives agree that intellectual capital is critical to

5、 the continued success of their businesses, their methods of measuring and managing these invisible enablers of performance are either poor or non-existent. this finding was the impetus for the creation of a management accounting guideline called “impacting future value: how to manage your intellect

6、ual capital.” the guideline was published jointly by cima, the american institute of certified public accountants and the society of management accountants of canada with the aim of giving managers practical tools and techniques to identify, measure, manage and report intellectual capital. it provid

7、es detailed guidance covering the following five steps of successful intellectual capital management: -how to identify the intellectual capital in your organization.-how to map the intellectual capital and assess its strategic importance.-how to measure intellectual capital.-how to manage intellectu

8、al capital.-how to report intellectual capital.i will concentrate on the measurement problem and offer some insights about how to make intellectual capital measurable. for the full tool kit, please refer to the management accounting guideline.performance indicators are useful only if they provide me

9、aningful and relevant information. sadly, typical performance measurement practice for intellectual capital can be described as follows:- identify everything that is easy to measure.-collect and report the data on everything that is easy to measure.-end up scratching your head and thinking: what the

10、 heck are we going to do with all this performance data?to avoid this trap, you need to identify the intellectual capital elements that are relevant to your business and its strategy, and only then should you think about measuring them. we often have a misconception that intellectual capital is diff

11、icult or impossible to measure. this is not the case; it is probably easier than what you think and many measurement methods are available. but before we go into any more detail on this, lets first define what exactly we mean by intellectual capital. the organizations own more intellectual assets su

12、ch as human resources, knowledge bases, research and development and patents than traditional assets such as plant and machinery and equipment. by deploying intellectual capital to create competitive advantage and by obtaining knowledge-creating resources from across the world, the firms have succes

13、sfully created competitive advantage for themselves. knowledge-base strategy is a response that connects the special characteristics and measurements of a company with local advisability in which they work for it. in the sophisticated and searching world, the organizations must be so clever and stro

14、ng to use some opportunities including the combination of new explorations and available knowledge use, sharing and supporting knowledge, intellectual capital flow management.together with physical and financial capital, intellectual capital is one of the three vital resources in an organization. it

15、 includes all intangible resources that contribute to the delivery of the organizations strategy. these can be split into three groups: human capital, relational capital and structural capital see panel 1 . the main sub-categories of an organizations human capital are, naturally, its peoples skills

16、and their depth and breadth of experience. human capital includes employees know-how in certain fields that are important to the success of the enterprise, plus their aptitudes.relational capital covers all the relationships that exist between the organization and other parties. these can include cu

17、stomers, intermediaries, employees, suppliers, alliance partners, regulators, pressure groups, communities, creditors or investors. relationships tend to fall into two categories: those that are formalized through contractual obligations with big customers and partners, for example; and those that a

18、re less formal.structural capital covers a broad range of vital factors. foremost among them are usually the organizations essential operating processes; the way its structured; its policies; its information flows and the content of its databases; its management style and culture; and its incentive

19、schemes. it can also include intangible resources that are legally protected. structural capital can be sub-categorized into practices and routines, organizational culture and intellectual property.the different elements of the three categories can overlap. the aim is not to have a rigorous framewor

20、k that clearly separates them, but to have one that you can use to identify and understand intellectual capital in your organization. once you have decided which of these so-called intellectual value drivers you want to measure, its important to determine whether its actually worth measuring them. t

21、he aim of performance measures should be to provide meaningful information that helps to reduce uncertainty about intellectual capital and enables us to learn. measures ought to help us make better-informed decisions that enable us to improve our performance. an excellent way of ensuring that any in

22、dicator is worth measuring is to establish the questions that the indicator will help to answer. in my work at the advanced performance institute, i have developed the trademarked concept of key performance questions kpq to identify what it is that managers want to know about the various intellectua

23、l capital value drivers.quite fundamentally, one must realize that nothing can be measured except the achievement of a goal. key performance indicators kpis only make sense when they are linked to a specific goal. in a sense, goals always formulate a question, to which the kpi provides an answer. to

24、 keep with the intellectual capital of success measurement: for each kpi, a key performance question kpq is needed. kpqs make sure that any measure has a clear aim. if no question needs to be answered, there should be no need to measure anything. once a question has been identified, you have to star

25、t thinking about how to collect measurement data. at this point it is safe to assume that this intellectual capital value driver has probably been measured before, so dont reinvent the wheel. do some research to find out whether measurement methods have already been developed. this can usually be do

26、ne with simple internet searches. if methods do exist, assess whether any of them are appropriate, as not all of them will be useful to you. if no appropriate method seems to exist, a new one has to be designed.for both existing and newly developed methods, you need to assess whether its possible to

27、 collect meaningful data and whether that data will help to answer your questions. it is also important to assess whether the resultant data warrants the costs and efforts of measurement, which can be significant. if no meaningful data can be collected or its not really helping you to answer the kpq

28、 or if the costs are not justified, it is necessary to rethink and design different indicators. once you have decided on an indicator, you should then identify the measurement instrument; the data source; the formula used to compute the indicator; the frequency of measurement; any targets or benchma

29、rks; who will be doing the measuring; how long the indicator will be collected before it needs to be reviewed; the target audience for the indicator; and the reporting formats.lets consider how an organization might apply the above approach in practice. a blue-chip company, intercorp, wanted to meas

30、ure its partnership with its key supplier an important intellectual capital value driver. initially it didnt design kpqs and instead tried to find the quickest and easiest way to obtain some data. it did a little research and identified a firm that specialized in partnership evaluations and had desi

31、gned a generic questionnaire. intercorp outsourced the collection of partnership data to this firm, which started to conduct the survey twice a year.“the aim of performance measures should be to provide meaningful information that helps to reduce uncertainty about intellectual capital and enables us

32、 to learn. measures ought to help us make better-informed decisions that enable us to improve our performance.”initially, intercorp was pleased with the service, since the firm provided detailed reports containing graphs, tables and trend analyses on about 50 different questions. while on the surfac

33、e, intercorp seemed happy with how things were going, the partners were telling a different story. they felt that a lot of unnecessary data was being collected, which took them a lot of time and effort. it became clear that all of the data intercorp was collecting was interesting to know, but that w

34、as it. not one decision had been based on the survey data over the past three years. intercorp went back to the drawing board and identified the question it really wanted to answer. the kpq it came up with was: how well are our partnerships progressing? it then considered what data would be needed i

35、n order to answer the question and the best collection method. after some deliberation, it agreed that the best solution was to ask the account managers for their assessment of relationships, which wouldnt require a long survey.intercorp designed a system that automatically e-mailed a simple form to

36、 the account managers with only two questions: how would you assess the relationship with company x? and how well is the partnership with company x progressing? next to the questions, the form included scales. initially these had ten tick-boxes ranging from very bad to very good.these were later ref

37、ined to three-point scales: problematic, indifferent or positive for the first question and worse than before, the same as before and better than before for the second question.the form also included a field for a written comment. account managers are now asked to assess the partnership by ticking a

38、 box on the scale and providing a short explanation of why they made that particular assessment. intercorp realised that it might get a biased view if it asked only the account managers, so it e-mailed a version of the form to its partner firms that didnt include the comment field. the responses wer

39、e compared in a database, and in over 95 per cent of cases, the internal and external assessments were identical. where big differences in opinion occurred, the automated system triggered another e-mail to the account manager in question, prompting him or her to discuss any potential issues with the

40、 partner company.intercorp also decided that the data should be collected monthly, which should allow it to react to potential problems before they escalated. it now has a simple and cost-effective monthly performance measurement system for its supplier relationships, which gives it all the informat

41、ion it needs to answer its kpq.this case illustrates the power of the kpq approach and how it can be used to make any aspect of intellectual capital measurable. success in todays economy is driven by intellectual capital above all. it is critical, therefore, to understand and manage the intellectual

42、 capital that underpins value creation in your organization.panel 1 classification of intellectual capital:physical capital financial capitalintellectual capitalhuman capital:knowledge and skillswork-related experiencecompetenciesvocational qualificationsemployee engagementemotional intelligenceentr

43、epreneurial spiritflexibilityemployee loyaltyemployee satisfactioneducation- creativityrelational capital:formal relationshipsinformal relationshipssocial networkspartnershipsalliancesbrand imagetrustcorporate reputationcustomer loyaltycustomer engagementlicensing agreementsjoint venturesstructural capital:organizational culture:? corporate values? social capital? management philosophyintellectual property? brand names? data and information? codified knowledge? patents / copyrights? trade secretsprocesses / routines:? formal proce

温馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
  • 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
  • 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
  • 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
  • 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

评论

0/150

提交评论