版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领
文档简介
AMSTARChecklist
ArticleName:
1.DidtheresearchquestionsandinclusioncriteriaforthereviewincludethecomponentsofPICO?
ForYes:
Optional(recommended)
Population
Timeframeforfollowup
Yes
No
Intervention
Comparatorgroup
Outcome
2.Didthereportofthereviewcontainanexplicitstatementthatthereviewmethodswereestablishedpriortotheconductofthereviewanddidthereportjustifyanysignificantdeviationsfromtheprotocol?
ForPartialYes:
TheauthorsstatethattheyhadawrittenprotocolorguidethatincludedALLthefollowing:
ForYes:
Asforpartialyes,plustheprotocolshouldberegisteredandshouldalsohavespecified:
reviewquestion(s)
ameta-analysis/synthesisplan,ifappropriate,and
Yes
PartialYes
No
asearchstrategy
aplanforinvestigatingcausesofheterogeneity
inclusion/exclusioncriteria
aplanforinvestigatingcausesofheterogeneity
ariskofbiasassessment
3.Didthereviewauthorsexplaintheirselectionofthestudydesignsforinclusioninthereview?
ForYes,thereviewshouldsatisfyONEofthefollowing:
ExplanationforincludingonlyRCTs
Yes
No
ORExplanationforincludingonlyNRSI
ORExplanationforincludingbothRCTsandNRSI
4.Didthereviewauthorsuseacomprehensiveliteraturesearchstrategy?
ForPartialYes(allthefollowing):
ForYes,shouldalsohave(allthefollowing):
searchedatleast2databases(relevanttoresearchquestion)
searchedthereferencelists/bibliographiesofincludedstudies
Yes
PartialYes
No
providedkeywordand/orsearchstrategy
searchedtrial/studyregistries
justifiedpublicationrestrictions(e.g.language)
included/consultedcontentexpertsinthefield
whererelevant,searchedforgreyliterature
conductedsearchwithin24monthsofcompletionofthereview
5.Didthereviewauthorsperformstudyselectioninduplicate?
ForYes,eitherONEofthefollowing:
atleasttworeviewersindependentlyagreedonselectionofeligiblestudiesandachievedconsensusonwhichstudiestoinclude
Yes
No
ORtworeviewersselectedasampleofeligiblestudiesandachievedgoodagreement(atleast80percent),withtheremainderselectedbyonereviewer.
6.Didthereviewauthorsperformdataextractioninduplicate?
ForYes,eitherONEofthefollowing:
atleasttworeviewersachievedconsensusonwhichdatatoextractfromincludedstudies
Yes
No
ORtworeviewersextracteddatafromasampleofeligiblestudiesandachievedgoodagreement(atleast80percent),withtheremainderextractedbyonereviewer.
7.Didthereviewauthorsprovidealistofexcludedstudiesandjustifytheexclusions?
ForPartialYes:
ForYes,mustalsohave:
providedalistofallpotentiallyrelevantstudiesthatwerereadinfull-textformbutexcludedfromthereview
Justifiedtheexclusionfromthereviewofeachpotentiallyrelevantstudy
Yes
PartialYes
No
8.Didthereviewauthorsdescribetheincludedstudiesinadequatedetail?
ForPartialYes(ALLthefollowing):
ForYes,shouldalsohaveALLthefollowing:
describedpopulations
describedpopulationindetail
Yes
PartialYes
No
describedinterventions
describedinterventionindetail(includingdoseswhererelevant)
describedcomparators
describedcomparatorindetail(includingdoseswhererelevant)
describedoutcomes
describedstudy’ssetting
describedresearchdesigns
timeframeforfollow-up
9.Didthereviewauthorsuseasatisfactorytechniqueforassessingtheriskofbias(RoB)inindividualstudiesthatwereincludedinthereview?
RCTs
ForPartialYes,musthaveassessedRoBfrom
ForYes,mustalsohaveassessedRoBfrom:
unconcealedallocation,and
allocationsequencethatwasnottrulyrandom,and
Yes
PartialYes
No
IncludesonlyNRSI
lackofblindingofpatientsandassessorswhenassessingoutcomes(unnecessaryforobjectiveoutcomessuchasall-causemortality)
selectionofthereportedresultfromamongmultiplemeasurementsoranalysesofaspecifiedoutcome
NRSI
ForPartialYes,musthaveassessedRoB:
ForYes,mustalsohaveassessedRoB:
fromconfounding,and
methodsusedtoascertainexposuresandoutcomes,and
Yes
PartialYes
No
IncludesonlyRCTs
fromselectionbias
selectionofthereportedresultfromamongmultiplemeasurementsoranalysesofaspecifiedoutcome
10.Didthereviewauthorsreportonthesourcesoffundingforthestudiesincludedinthereview?
ForYes
Musthavereportedonthesourcesoffundingforindividualstudiesincludedinthereview.Note:Reportingthatthereviewerslookedforthisinformationbutitwasnotreportedbystudyauthorsalsoqualifies
Yes
No
11.Ifmeta-analysiswasperformeddidthereviewauthorsuseappropriatemethodsforstatisticalcombinationofresults?
RCTs
ForYes:
Theauthorsjustifiedcombiningthedatainameta-analysis
Yes
No
Nometa-analysisconducted
ANDtheyusedanappropriateweightedtechniquetocombinestudyresultsandadjustedforheterogeneityifpresent.
ANDinvestigatedthecausesofanyheterogeneity
ForNRSI
ForYes:
Theauthorsjustifiedcombiningthedatainameta-analysis
Yes
No
Nometa-analysisconducted
ANDtheyusedanappropriateweightedtechniquetocombinestudyresults,adjustingforheterogeneityifpresent
ANDtheystatisticallycombinedeffectestimatesfromNRSIthatwereadjustedforconfounding,ratherthancombiningrawdata,orjustifiedcombiningrawdatawhenadjustedeffectestimateswerenotavailable
ANDtheyreportedseparatesummaryestimatesforRCTsandNRSIseparatelywhenbothwereincludedinthereview
12.Ifmeta-analysiswasperformed,didthereviewauthorsassessthepotentialimpactofRoBinindividualstudiesontheresultsofthemeta-analysisorotherevidencesynthesis?
ForYes:
includedonlylowriskofbiasRCTs
Yes
No
Nometa-analysisconducted
OR,ifthepooledestimatewasbasedonRCTsand/orNRSIatvariableRoB,theauthorsperformedanalysestoinvestigatepossibleimpactofRoBonsummaryestimatesofeffect.
13.DidthereviewauthorsaccountforRoBinindividualstudieswheninterpreting/discussingtheresultsofthereview?
ForYes:
includedonlylowriskofbiasRCTs
Yes
No
OR,ifRCTswithmoderateorhighRoB,orNRSIwereincludedthereviewprovidedadiscussionofthelikelyimpactofRoBontheresults
14.Didthereviewauthorsprovideasatisfactoryexplanationfor,anddiscussionof,anyheterogeneityobservedintheresultsofthereview?
ForYes:
Therewasnosignificantheterogeneityintheresults
Yes
No
ORifheterogeneitywaspresenttheauthorsperformedaninvestigationofsourcesofanyheterogeneityintheresultsanddiscussedtheimpactofthisontheresultsofthereview
15.Iftheyperformedquantitativesynthesisdidthereviewauthorscarryoutanadequateinvestigationofpublicationbias(smallstudybias)anddiscussitslikelyimpactontheresultsofthereview?
ForYes:
温馨提示
- 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
- 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
- 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
- 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
- 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
- 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。
最新文档
- 2024年度大产权房屋买卖合同范本:二手房交易税费减免政策3篇
- 2024年度事业单位附属食堂租赁服务协议3篇
- 2024年地产项目广告合作效果跟踪与优化合同3篇
- 2024年标准夫妻分居合同模板版B版
- 2024年度特种货物运输安全生产管理合同3篇
- 2024年度养殖类企业养殖废弃物资源化利用项目投资合同3篇
- 2024年度环保型地磅采购及售后服务协议3篇
- 2024年度人工智能辅助职业规划服务劳动合同3篇
- 2024年度文化设备租赁及活动支持合同3篇
- 2024年度国际贸易担保合同范本6篇
- GB/T 45089-20240~3岁婴幼儿居家照护服务规范
- 政府还款协议书(2篇)
- 院内获得性肺炎护理
- 居家养老服务报价明细表
- MOOC 研究生学术规范与学术诚信-南京大学 中国大学慕课答案
- 24春国家开放大学《离散数学》大作业参考答案
- 浙江大学实验报告(流体力学)
- 2023年大学生《思想道德与法治》考试题库附答案(712题)
- 2023年华南理工大学自然辩证法期末考试真题回忆版带参考答案
- 防护设备操作手册
- 学前教育-幼儿园环境创设对幼儿创造力和审美性影响研究
评论
0/150
提交评论