常用的meta分析文献质量评价量表:AMSTAR-Checklist-for-系统综述质量评价_第1页
常用的meta分析文献质量评价量表:AMSTAR-Checklist-for-系统综述质量评价_第2页
常用的meta分析文献质量评价量表:AMSTAR-Checklist-for-系统综述质量评价_第3页
常用的meta分析文献质量评价量表:AMSTAR-Checklist-for-系统综述质量评价_第4页
常用的meta分析文献质量评价量表:AMSTAR-Checklist-for-系统综述质量评价_第5页
已阅读5页,还剩1页未读 继续免费阅读

下载本文档

版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领

文档简介

AMSTARChecklist

ArticleName:

1.DidtheresearchquestionsandinclusioncriteriaforthereviewincludethecomponentsofPICO?

ForYes:

Optional(recommended)

Population

Timeframeforfollowup

Yes

No

Intervention

Comparatorgroup

Outcome

2.Didthereportofthereviewcontainanexplicitstatementthatthereviewmethodswereestablishedpriortotheconductofthereviewanddidthereportjustifyanysignificantdeviationsfromtheprotocol?

ForPartialYes:

TheauthorsstatethattheyhadawrittenprotocolorguidethatincludedALLthefollowing:

ForYes:

Asforpartialyes,plustheprotocolshouldberegisteredandshouldalsohavespecified:

reviewquestion(s)

ameta-analysis/synthesisplan,ifappropriate,and

Yes

PartialYes

No

asearchstrategy

aplanforinvestigatingcausesofheterogeneity

inclusion/exclusioncriteria

aplanforinvestigatingcausesofheterogeneity

ariskofbiasassessment

3.Didthereviewauthorsexplaintheirselectionofthestudydesignsforinclusioninthereview?

ForYes,thereviewshouldsatisfyONEofthefollowing:

ExplanationforincludingonlyRCTs

Yes

No

ORExplanationforincludingonlyNRSI

ORExplanationforincludingbothRCTsandNRSI

4.Didthereviewauthorsuseacomprehensiveliteraturesearchstrategy?

ForPartialYes(allthefollowing):

ForYes,shouldalsohave(allthefollowing):

searchedatleast2databases(relevanttoresearchquestion)

searchedthereferencelists/bibliographiesofincludedstudies

Yes

PartialYes

No

providedkeywordand/orsearchstrategy

searchedtrial/studyregistries

justifiedpublicationrestrictions(e.g.language)

included/consultedcontentexpertsinthefield

whererelevant,searchedforgreyliterature

conductedsearchwithin24monthsofcompletionofthereview

5.Didthereviewauthorsperformstudyselectioninduplicate?

ForYes,eitherONEofthefollowing:

atleasttworeviewersindependentlyagreedonselectionofeligiblestudiesandachievedconsensusonwhichstudiestoinclude

Yes

No

ORtworeviewersselectedasampleofeligiblestudiesandachievedgoodagreement(atleast80percent),withtheremainderselectedbyonereviewer.

6.Didthereviewauthorsperformdataextractioninduplicate?

ForYes,eitherONEofthefollowing:

atleasttworeviewersachievedconsensusonwhichdatatoextractfromincludedstudies

Yes

No

ORtworeviewersextracteddatafromasampleofeligiblestudiesandachievedgoodagreement(atleast80percent),withtheremainderextractedbyonereviewer.

7.Didthereviewauthorsprovidealistofexcludedstudiesandjustifytheexclusions?

ForPartialYes:

ForYes,mustalsohave:

providedalistofallpotentiallyrelevantstudiesthatwerereadinfull-textformbutexcludedfromthereview

Justifiedtheexclusionfromthereviewofeachpotentiallyrelevantstudy

Yes

PartialYes

No

8.Didthereviewauthorsdescribetheincludedstudiesinadequatedetail?

ForPartialYes(ALLthefollowing):

ForYes,shouldalsohaveALLthefollowing:

describedpopulations

describedpopulationindetail

Yes

PartialYes

No

describedinterventions

describedinterventionindetail(includingdoseswhererelevant)

describedcomparators

describedcomparatorindetail(includingdoseswhererelevant)

describedoutcomes

describedstudy’ssetting

describedresearchdesigns

timeframeforfollow-up

9.Didthereviewauthorsuseasatisfactorytechniqueforassessingtheriskofbias(RoB)inindividualstudiesthatwereincludedinthereview?

RCTs

ForPartialYes,musthaveassessedRoBfrom

ForYes,mustalsohaveassessedRoBfrom:

unconcealedallocation,and

allocationsequencethatwasnottrulyrandom,and

Yes

PartialYes

No

IncludesonlyNRSI

lackofblindingofpatientsandassessorswhenassessingoutcomes(unnecessaryforobjectiveoutcomessuchasall-causemortality)

selectionofthereportedresultfromamongmultiplemeasurementsoranalysesofaspecifiedoutcome

NRSI

ForPartialYes,musthaveassessedRoB:

ForYes,mustalsohaveassessedRoB:

fromconfounding,and

methodsusedtoascertainexposuresandoutcomes,and

Yes

PartialYes

No

IncludesonlyRCTs

fromselectionbias

selectionofthereportedresultfromamongmultiplemeasurementsoranalysesofaspecifiedoutcome

10.Didthereviewauthorsreportonthesourcesoffundingforthestudiesincludedinthereview?

ForYes

Musthavereportedonthesourcesoffundingforindividualstudiesincludedinthereview.Note:Reportingthatthereviewerslookedforthisinformationbutitwasnotreportedbystudyauthorsalsoqualifies

Yes

No

11.Ifmeta-analysiswasperformeddidthereviewauthorsuseappropriatemethodsforstatisticalcombinationofresults?

RCTs

ForYes:

Theauthorsjustifiedcombiningthedatainameta-analysis

Yes

No

Nometa-analysisconducted

ANDtheyusedanappropriateweightedtechniquetocombinestudyresultsandadjustedforheterogeneityifpresent.

ANDinvestigatedthecausesofanyheterogeneity

ForNRSI

ForYes:

Theauthorsjustifiedcombiningthedatainameta-analysis

Yes

No

Nometa-analysisconducted

ANDtheyusedanappropriateweightedtechniquetocombinestudyresults,adjustingforheterogeneityifpresent

ANDtheystatisticallycombinedeffectestimatesfromNRSIthatwereadjustedforconfounding,ratherthancombiningrawdata,orjustifiedcombiningrawdatawhenadjustedeffectestimateswerenotavailable

ANDtheyreportedseparatesummaryestimatesforRCTsandNRSIseparatelywhenbothwereincludedinthereview

12.Ifmeta-analysiswasperformed,didthereviewauthorsassessthepotentialimpactofRoBinindividualstudiesontheresultsofthemeta-analysisorotherevidencesynthesis?

ForYes:

includedonlylowriskofbiasRCTs

Yes

No

Nometa-analysisconducted

OR,ifthepooledestimatewasbasedonRCTsand/orNRSIatvariableRoB,theauthorsperformedanalysestoinvestigatepossibleimpactofRoBonsummaryestimatesofeffect.

13.DidthereviewauthorsaccountforRoBinindividualstudieswheninterpreting/discussingtheresultsofthereview?

ForYes:

includedonlylowriskofbiasRCTs

Yes

No

OR,ifRCTswithmoderateorhighRoB,orNRSIwereincludedthereviewprovidedadiscussionofthelikelyimpactofRoBontheresults

14.Didthereviewauthorsprovideasatisfactoryexplanationfor,anddiscussionof,anyheterogeneityobservedintheresultsofthereview?

ForYes:

Therewasnosignificantheterogeneityintheresults

Yes

No

ORifheterogeneitywaspresenttheauthorsperformedaninvestigationofsourcesofanyheterogeneityintheresultsanddiscussedtheimpactofthisontheresultsofthereview

15.Iftheyperformedquantitativesynthesisdidthereviewauthorscarryoutanadequateinvestigationofpublicationbias(smallstudybias)anddiscussitslikelyimpactontheresultsofthereview?

ForYes:

温馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
  • 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
  • 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
  • 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
  • 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

评论

0/150

提交评论