设计开题报告计算

LAMPLAMP1.11.1.2.（2）2.2LAMPLAMPLinuxApacheMySQLPHP四个开源软件构成的开放资源2.2LAMPLAMPLinuxApacheMySQLPHP四个开源软件构成的开放资源Apache服务器，令其辨识不同的主机名。2.2.3Linux2.3LAMP（Linux+Apache+Mysql+Php）1．addingthe2．checktherevisetheDeletetheLinuxApache网络服务器，MysqlPHPLinuxApache网络服务器，MysqlPHPLAMP设计（论文）起止时间：201491920155301571112910121314（包括国内外现状、研究方向、进展情况、存在问题、参考依据等（包括国内外现状、研究方向、进展情况、存在问题、参考依据等1.1.发。ASPASP务器、MySQLPHPWeb应用程掌握”特性，使得它的网络开发更加有效[7]。LAMPLAMP得更加具有竞争力，更加能吸引客户。开放源代码的LAMP使用高性能的操作系统Linux)、高性能的网页服务器Apache)、高性能的数据库(MySQL)、高效率的编程语言(PHP)WebLAMPLinuxWindowsUnix具有先天的优势。一方面是LinuxLinux对硬件的要求较低，跨Windows网络系统相比，Linux系统的网络性能优异，具有较好的稳定性、高效性和安全性。Linux处在最底层，提供操作系统。灵活性和可定制化的特点使它能够产生一种高度定制的平台，让其它组件在上面运行。Apache，PHPMySQLWindows（IISwebApache）上[8]。LinuxLAMP组合的基础，它的安全关系到整个系统的稳定，只有保证LinuxUnixWindows、ApacheApache节点数Apache等其他服务器集成在一起。MySQL体积小，速PHP(HypertextPreprocessor，超文本预处理器的缩写)是一种当今最为流行的有开源和免费的独特优势[11]。PHPWebPHPHTMLPHPLinux+Apache+Mysql+Perl/PHP/PythonLinuxApacheWEB服务器、MySQLPHPhttp请求，都由LinuxApache服务器处理，如果请求静态页面，则将目录下存放PHPPHPPHP面返回给客户端[12]Internet的快速发展，电子商务的普及，网上购物已经成为一种很普遍的早期安装一个LAMP系统是比较复杂的，随着面返回给客户端[12]Internet的快速发展，电子商务的普及，网上购物已经成为一种很普遍的早期安装一个LAMP系统是比较复杂的，随着Linux的普及现在安装一个LAMPLinux发行版本（Redhat、Debian）安装时可Apache、php、mysql等组件。LAMP（Linux、Apache、MySQLPHP/Perl）架构的应用程序不断被强大而简单的环境[13]。按照简单的形式，基于LAMP的应用程序是用PHP这LinuxApacheWebPHPURL户机获得信息，从而确定应该执行什么操作。PHPApache的一个扩展模块进行安装的，它不能独立运行，必须依托于Apache服务器[14]。服务器会从MySQLHTML模板组合在一起，并将结果返回在内的大部分数据库[15]＋PHP＋MySQLLinuxMYSQLLinuxMYSQL数据库，最后安装PHPApache。PHPPHPPHPMySQL数据PHP语句时要注意的格式和语法。虞萍.虞萍.影响企业电子商务成功的网站因素研究[D].北京中国农业大张庆坏.我国同城电子商务的发展机遇及前景[J].吉林工程技术师范学院齐晶.中国电子商务发展与规制研究[D].辽宁:辽宁大学郑镇耿.LAMP环境架设Apache虚拟主机站点[J].计算机光盘软件与应彭俊.LAMP的网址导航站的设计与实现[D].南昌:南昌大学王丽娜.基于LAMP的家乐电器网上商城的开发[D].大连:大连理工大薛鸿民.基于LAMP的售书网站的设计与实现[J].科技资讯Ramana,U.V.,Prabhakar,T.V.SomeExperimentswiththePerformanceofLAMPArchitecture[C].ComputerandInformationTechnology,2005.CIT2005.TheFifthInternationalConference,2005,P916–920.黄阳.LAMP架构电商平台方案设计[J].电子商务.2013,10:44-何杭锋.基于LAMP平台的WEB服务器架构[J].中国新技术新产ZaidmanA,DemeyerS.Automaticidentificationofkeyclassesinasoftwaresystemusingwebminingtechniques[J].ResearchandPractice.2008,20(6):387–417.张麦玲,王鸿铭.LAMPWEB服务器安全架构[J].数字技术与应蒋方纯.LAMP开源软件编程模式的配置与实现[J].深圳信息职业技术学肖萍.LAMP平台的网站构建与分析[J].信息网络安全谷和启.PHP+LINUX+APACHEAttaining原稿题目PerspectivesAttaining原稿题目PerspectivesonFreeand（野生转移，并发缺陷和分布式系统故障（野生转移，并发缺陷和分布式系统故障率的编程可以颠覆这些工具的目的,进一步比较平衡的讨论，请参见五篇论文(Lipner2000;McGraw2000;Neumann2000;Schneider2000;andWittenetal.2000)LeeBadge组织和主持。这些贡献基本上都是健全这里列出的优点或缺点。Lipner探索了一些真正的好处和一些重大缺openish商业模式。Witten论文探讨经济学、指标和模型。此外，NeumannNeumann2004DARPA的报告(Neumann2003年)ACM的档案风险指数(Neumann2003b)ACM的档案风险指数(Neumann2003b)户和专家可以使他们仔细研读代码并发现弱点（Kerckhoffs1883年（2002Brown（Collar-Kotelly2002年还有一个相关的问题就是：有关被发现的漏洞信息是否需要公布。20032Slashdot的技术报告下载Anderson的重要途径，并且它经常的情况是，开放系统（或封闭的系统）PerspectivesonFreeandOpenSource“IsPerspectivesonFreeandOpenSource“Isopensourcesoftwareinherentlybetterthanclosed-sourceproprietarysoftware?”Thisisaquestionthatisfrequentlyheard,withvariousintendedmeaningsof“better.”Asaparticularlydemandingcase,letusconsidercriticalapplicationswithstringentrequirementsforcertainattributessuchassecurity,reliability,faulttolerance,humansafety,andsurvivability,allinthefaceofawiderangeofrealisticadversities—including coordinatedattacks,andactsofGod.Inaddition,let’stossinoperationalrequirementsforextensiveinteroperability,evolvability,maintainability,andcleaninterfacedesignofthosesystems,whilestillsatisfyingthecriticalrequirements.Inthiscontext,weareinterestedindeveloping,operating,andusingcomputersystemsthatarerobustandeasilyTocuttothechase,theanswertothesimplequestionposedinthefirstsentenceissimpleinconcept,butdecidedlynotsosimpleinexecution:Opensourcesoftwareisnotintrinsicallybetterthanclosed-sourceproprietarysoftware.However,ithasthepotentialforbeingbetterifitsdevelopmentprocessaddressesmanyfactorsthatarenormallyexperiencedinmass-marketproprietarysoftware,suchastheWell-definedandthoroughlyevaluatedrequirementsforsystemandapplicationbehavior,includingfunctionalrequirements,behavioralrequirements,operationalrequirements,and—aboveall—arealisticrangeofsecurityandreliabilitySystemandnetworkarchitecturesthatexplicitlyaddresstheserequirements.Soundarchitecturescanleadtosignificantcostandqualitybenefitsthroughoutthedevelopmentandlatersystemevolution.Asystemdevelopmentapproachthatexplicitlyaddressestheserequirements,pervasivelyandconsistentlythroughoutthedevelopment.。Useofprogramminglanguagesthatareinherentlyabletoavoidmanyofthecharacteristicflaws(suchasbufferoverflows,typemismatches,wildtransfers,concurrencyflaws,anddistributed-systemglitches)thattypicallyariseinunstructured,untyped,anderror-pronelanguagesandthatseemtoprevailoverdecades,throughnewsystemreleasesandnewsystems.Intelligentuseofcompilersandotherdevelopmenttoolsthathelpinidentifyingeliminatingadditionalflaws.However,sloppyprogrammingcansubverttheintentthesetools,andthesetools,andthusgoodprogrammingpracticeisstillExtensivedisciplineonthepartofdesigners,implementers,andmanagersthroughouttheentiresoftwaredevelopmentprocess.Thisultimatelyrequiresbetterintegrationofarchitecture,security,reliability,soundprogrammingtechniques,andsoftwareengineeringintothemainstreamofoureducationalandtrainingprograms.Pervasiveattentiontomaintainingconsistencywiththestatedrequirementsthroughoutoperation,administration,andmaintenance,despiteongoingsystemiterations.Somecombinationofformalandinformalapproachescanbeveryhelpfulinthisregard.Conceptually,manyproblemscanbeavoidedthroughsuitablychosenarchitectures,programminglanguages,compilers,andotheranalysistools—althoughultimately,theabilitiesofdesignersandprogrammersarealimitingfactor.Theanswertotheinitiallyposedquestionshouldnotbesurprisingtoanyonewhohashadconsiderableexperienceindevelopingsoftwarethatmustsatisfystringentrequirements.However,notethatalthoughthesamedisciplinecouldbeusedbythedevelopersofclosed-sourcesoftware,marketplaceforcestendtomakethismuchmoredifficultthanintheopensourceworld.Inparticular,thereseemstobeanincreasingtendencyamongthemass-marketproprietarysoftwaredeveloperstorushtomarket,whethertheproductisreadyornot—inessence,lettingthecustomersbethebetatesters.Furthermore,effortstoreducecostsoftenseemtoresultinlowest-common-denominatorproducts.Indeed,satisfyingstringentrequirementsforsecurityandreliability(forexample)isgenerallynotagoalthatyieldsmaximumprofits.Thus,forpracticalreasons,Iconcludethattheopen-sourceparadigmhassignificantpotentialthatismuchmoredifficulttoattaininclosed-sourceproprietarysystems.Thepotentialbenefitsofnonproprietarynonclosed-sourcesoftwarealsoincludetheabilitytomoreeasilycarryoutopenpeerreviews,addnewfunctionalityeitherlocallyortothemainlineproducts,identifyflaws,andfixthemrapidly—forexample,throughcollaborativeeffortsinvolvingpeopleirrespectiveoftheirgeographicallocationsandcorporateallegiances.Ofcourse,therisksincludeincreasedopportunitiesforevil-doerstodiscoverflawsthatcanbeexploited,andtoinserttrapdoorsandTrojanhorsesintothecode.Thusasensibleenvironmentmusthavemechanismsforensuringreliableandsecuresoftwaredistributionandlocalsystemintegrity.Itmustalsomakegooduseofsystemarchitectures,publickeyauthentication,cryptographicintegrityseals,cryptography,andtrustworthydescriptionsoftheprovenanceofindividualcomponentsandwhocryptography,andtrustworthydescriptionsoftheprovenanceofindividualcomponentsandwhohasmodifiedthem.Furtherresearchisneededonsystemsthatcanbepredictablycomposedoutofevaluatedcomponentsorthatcansurmountsomeofthevulnerabilitiesofthecomponents.Westillneedtoavoiddesignflawsandimplementationbugs,andtowarrantiesonsystemstodayaremostlyveryweak.Westilllackseriousmarketincentives.However,despiteallthechallenges,thepotentialbenefitsofrobustopen-sourcesoftwareareworthyofconsiderablecollaborativeeffort.Forafurtherfairlybalanceddiscussionoftherelativeadvantagesanddisadvantageswithrespecttoimprovingsecurity,seefivepapers(Lipner2000;McGraw2000;Neumann2000;Schneider2000;andWittenetal.2000)presentedatthe2000IEEESymposiumonSecurityandPrivacy.ThesessionwasorganizedandchairedbyLeeBadger.Thesecontributionsallessentiallyamplifytheprosand/orconsoutlinedhere.Lipnerexploressomerealbenefitsandsomesignificantdrawbacks.McGrawstatesflatlythat“openish”softwarewillnotreallyimprovesecurity.Schneidernotesthat“thelion’sshareofthevulnerabilitiescausedbysoftwarebugsiseasilydealtwithbymeansotherthansourcecodeinspections.”Healsoconsidersinhospitabilitywithbusinessmodels.TheWittenpaperexploreseconomics,metrics,andmodels.Inaddition,Neumann’sWebdevelopmentforcriticalrequirements,withparticularattentiontotherequirements,systemandnetworkarchitectures,anddevelopmentpractices.Inparticular,seeNeumann2004forareportforDARPA(summarizedbrieflyinNeumann2003a)ontheimportanceofarchitecturesinattainingprincipledassuredlytrustworthycomposablesystemsandnetworks,withparticularemphasisonopensourcebutwithgeneralapplicabilityaswell.ThatreportispartoftheDARPACHATSprogramoncomposablehigh-assurancetrustedsystems,whichisseriouslyaddressingmanyofthepromisingaspectsofmakingopen-sourcesoftwaremuchmorerobust.Furthermore,seethearchivesoftheACMRisksForum,asummaryindex(Neumann2003b)tocountlesscasesofsystemsthatfailedtoliveuptotheirrequirements,andananalysisofmanyoftheseriskscasesandwhatneedstobedonetominimizetherisks(Neumann1995).Itisanobvioustruismthatweshouldbelearningnottomakethesamemistakessoconsistently.Itisanequallyobvioustruismthattheselessonsarenotbeinglearned—mostspecificallywithrespecttoreliability,survivability,interoperability,andmanyother“-PeopleintheopensourceandfreesoftwarecommunityoftenarguethatmakingsourcecodePeopleintheopensourceandfreesoftwarecommunityoftenarguethatmakingsourcecodeavailabletoallisgoodforsecurity.Usersandexpertscanporeoverthecodeandfindvulnerabilities:“tomanyeyes,allbugsareshallow,”asEricRaymond(2001,41)putsit.Thisideaisnotentirelynew.Intheworldofcryptography,ithasbeenstandardpracticesincethenineteenthcenturytoassumethattheopponentknowsthedesignofyoursystem,sotheonlywayyoucankeephimoutisbydenyinghimknowledgeofatemporaryvariable,thekey(Kerckhoffs1883).However,opendesignisnotanideathateveryoneaccepts,evennow.Opponentsoffreesoftwarearguethat“ifthesoftwareisinthepublicdomain,thenpotentialhackershavealsohadtheopportunitytostudythesoftwarecloselytodetermineitsvulnerabilities”(Brown2002).Thisissueisnowassumingeconomicandpoliticalimportance,astheantitrustsettlementbetweenMicrosoftandtheDepartmentofJusticecompelsMicrosofttomakealotofinformationaboutinterfacesavailabletoitscompetitors—butwiththeprovisionthatdatawhosedisclosuremightprejudicesecuritymaybewithheld(Collar-Kotelly2002).Unsurprisingly,Microsoftisnowdiscoveringthatmanymoreaspectsofitssystemsaresecurity-relevantthanhadpreviouslybeenthought.Thereisarelatedissue:whetherinformationaboutdiscoveredvulnerabilitiesmaybepublished.InFebruary2003,Citibankobtainedaninjunctionprohibitinganyreportingofsecurityvulnerabilitiesofautomatictellermachinesystemsdisclosedbymyselfandtwocolleaguesatatrialwhichwewereattendingasexpertwitnesses.Thiswascounterproductiveforthebank,asitcompelledustopublishourattacksinaninvitedtalkandatechnicalreportinthedaysjustbeforethegagginghearing.Wewereslashdottedandthetechnicalreportwasdownloadedover110,000times(AndersonandBond2003;BondandZielinski2003).Butthisisunlikelytobethelasttimethatgaggingordersareusedagainstsecurityvulnerabilities;ifanything,theDigitalMillenniumCopyrightActandtheproposedEuropeanUnionDirectiveontheenforcementofintellectualpropertyrightswillmakethemevenmorecommon.Sothereisgrowingpublicinterestinthequestionofwhetheropennessisofmorevaluetotheattackerorthedefender.Thisquestionismuchmoregeneralthanwhethersoftwaresourcecodeshouldbeavailabletousers.Awiderangeofsystemsandcomponentscanbeeithereasierormoredifficulttotest,inspect,andrepair,dependingontheavailabletoolsandaccess.Hardwaredevicescanoftenbereverseengineeredsurprisinglylittleeffort—althoughthecapitalresourcesneededtofabricateaclonemightbescarce.Thedifferencebetween“open”and“closed”mayalsobelegalratherthantechnical;iflawsprohib