unit7presupposition市公开课一等奖省赛课微课金奖课件_第1页
unit7presupposition市公开课一等奖省赛课微课金奖课件_第2页
unit7presupposition市公开课一等奖省赛课微课金奖课件_第3页
unit7presupposition市公开课一等奖省赛课微课金奖课件_第4页
unit7presupposition市公开课一等奖省赛课微课金奖课件_第5页
已阅读5页,还剩71页未读 继续免费阅读

下载本文档

版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领

文档简介

Unit7PragmaticPresupposition

/entries/presupposition/1/76PresuppositionOutlineIntroductionTheoryDailyuse

AdsAnalysisPresuppositionandEntailmentTypesorTriggers2/76PresuppositionIntroductionTheoryDailyUse

AdsAnalysisPresuppositionandEntailmentTypesorTriggers3/76Presupposition预设4/76Presupposition: Whataspeakerorwriterassumesthatthereceiversalreadyknows5/76Whydoespresuppositionexist?

Becauseitenablesustocommunicatesuccinctly.Itismucheasiertosay… Johndoesn’twriteanymore…thanitistosay…..ApersonwebothknowandagreethathisnameisJohn,andwhoknowshowtowrite,andwhoisabletowritepoetry,wrotepoetryinsomepasttime,andknowhedoesnotwritepoetry6/76Watchavideoadvertisement,doyouknowwhatitisadvertising?7/76TrueLoveIllyCoffee8/76PresuppositionIntroductionTheoryDailyUse

AdsAnalysisPresuppositionandEntailmentTypesorTriggers9/76Definition

Apresuppositionisbackgroundbelief,relatingtoanutterance,thatmustbemutuallyknownorassumedbythespeakerandaddresseefortheutterancetobeconsideredappropriateincontextgenerallywillremainanecessaryassumptionwhethertheutteranceisplacedintheformofanassertion,denial,orquestion,andcangenerallybeassociatedwithaspecificlexicalitemorgrammaticalfeature(presuppositiontrigger)intheutterance.10/76Pragmaticpresuppositionis“somethingthespeakerassumestobethecasepriortomakinganutteranceoramessagepreconditionfortheprocessingofanycommunication”(Yule,1996:25).Pragmaticpresuppositionsarebestdescribedasarelationbetweenaspeakerandtheappropriatenessofasentenceinacontext(Levinson,1997:177).Speakers,notsentences,havepresuppositions(Yule,1996:25).11/76何自然(1997)hassummarizedvariouskindsofpragmaticpresuppositionsasthefollowing:1)speaker’sassumptionofthecontextinwhichanutteranceismade,2)mutualknowledge,3)felicityconditionstobesatisfiedforaspeechacttobeperformed.12/76TheutteranceJohnregretsthathestoppeddoinglinguisticsbeforeheleftCambridgehasthefollowingpresuppositions:ThereissomeoneuniquelyidentifiabletospeakerandaddresseeasJohn.JohnstoppeddoinglinguisticsbeforeheleftCambridge.JohnwasdoinglinguisticsbeforeheleftCambridge.JohnleftCambridge.JohnhadbeenatCambridge.13/76SomemoreonthepragmatictheoryInfluentialexponentsincludeStalnaker(1974):suggestedthatwhenpeoplecommunicate,theyhaveacommongroundthisisabackgroundsetofassumptionsthattheybothmake,andknowtobetruepresuppositionworksagainstthiscommongroundfelicitoususeofanutterancerequiresthatitspresuppositionsbecommonlyheldbyallinterlocutors14/76DealingwithnewpresuppositionsIt’safactaboutcommunicationthatnoteverythingwepresupposeisknowntoourinterlocutorA:Mydogdied.B:Didn’tknowyouhadone.Waysout:wecanaskforclarificationsometimes,wedon’tbecausethepresuppositionisquiteclearandobviousWejustadoptit.15/76AccommodationLewis(1979)suggestedthatinterlocutorscarryoutaccomodation: Ifattimetsomethingissaidthatpresupposesp,butpisnotpresupposed(notincommonground),then,allotherthingsbeingequal,pisintroducedinthecommonground.16/76Ordinaryconversationdoesnotalwaysproceedintheidealorderlyfashiondescribedearlier.Peopledomakeleapsandshortcutsbyusingsentenceswhosepresuppositionsarenotsatisfiedintheconversationalcontext.Thisistheruleratherthantheexception[…]Ithinkwecanmaintainthatasentenceisalwaystakentobeanincrementtoacontextthatsatisfiesitspresuppositions.Ifthecurrentconversationalcontextdoesnotsuffice,thelistenerisentitledandexpectedtoextenditasrequired.(Karttunen1974:191)17/76AccommodationexampleSpeakerA(toB):Theguywhomurderedmycatwasreallyinsane.They’venowputhiminanasylum.SupposeBdidn’tknowmycatwasmurdered.ThedefinitedescriptiontheguywhomurderedmycatpresupposesthatthereisonepersonwhowasthemurdererofmycatBcanaccommodatethis,byassumingthatit’strueandisnowpartofcommonground18/76PresuppositionIntroductionTheoryDailyUse

AdsAnalysisPresuppositionandEntailmentTypesorTriggers19/76预设在日常生活对话中

应用和分析场景1:一家三口在吃火锅。背景是这家小孩很喜欢吃炸面筋。平时学校放学后他就喜欢马上去买来吃。恰好今天餐桌上就有炸面筋。对话就这么开始了。母亲:小新啊,你看,你最喜欢吃炸面筋好了。快趁热吃啊。儿子:马上夹起一块就放嘴里。母亲:怎样?不错吧?儿子:超好吃啊!!!母亲:你看,家里煮面筋又好吃,又洁净,以后尽可能不要在外面吃了,知道吗?儿子:哦,知道了。20/76分析:这里母亲在与儿子对话中预设了在外面吃不洁净,不好吃,所以对话中橙色部分就是预设。这里,预设了在外面吃东西不卫生这个客观情况。目标:母亲与儿子对话在这里到达了她教育目标:以后不要在外面乱吃东西。21/76场景2:大学宿舍小新刚下课。当他回到自己座位旁,发觉了女朋友送他水杯掉在了地上,旁边站着小觉是一脸无辜表情。小新:这是怎么回事?小觉:这个,这个……小新:你什么时候把他打烂?小觉:不是我啊,我也刚进来22/76作用:预设除了能够用于教育小辈之外(例1),还能够使听者有被责备感觉。不过这会使对话无法进行下去。而且很轻易造成误会。因为这里小新预设了杯就是小觉打烂。但事实可能是他人打烂或是别原因,只是小觉刚好站那里就招致误会了。当然,预设在日常生活中应用是举不胜举。此处就不再细列。23/76PresuppositionIntroductionTheoryDailyUse

AdsAnalysisPresuppositionandEntailmentTypesorTriggers24/76动感地带周杰伦纸条篇

StudentA:老师,我没有……StudentB:你看错了吧……老师.老师,我们没有作弊.Theteacher:你看到他们传纸条了吗?你看到他们作弊了吗?StudentC:没有.他们发短信.

他们发短信作弊.25/76动感地带周杰伦纸条篇

短信无处不在我地盘,我短信26/76台北市政府喝酒不开车篇我不该爱他.我爱他.我不该相信他.我相信他.我不该在他喝酒以后,还把车钥匙给他.他喝了酒.我把车钥匙给了他.27/76DrunkAlcoholKeyoftheCarCasualtyCarAccident28/76WrittenAdvertisements1.You’llwanttheCapitalOneNoHasslePlatinumcard,thedifferentcreditcardwithlowrate.Alowratethatstayslowwithoutintroductoryoffer,withoutexpiryrate.Justoneflatrateof6.9%p.aforbothbalancetransfersandpurchases.That’sit.Youcanrelax,knowingyou’vegottheflatrate,andwon’thavethehassleofswitchingcardsagain.TheCapitalOneNoHasslePlatinumcard.Lowratesthatstatlow.

29/76A.“1.You’llwanttheCapitalOneNoHasslePlatinumcard,thedifferentcreditcardwithlowrate”Thereisadifferentcreditcard,Thecreditcardiswithalowrate.B.“withoutintroductoryoffer,withoutexpiryrate”Theothercreditcardsarewithintroductoryofferandexpiryrate.C.“knowingyou’vegottheflatrate”ThereisaflatrateD.“won’thavethehassleofswitchingcardsagain”Youhadthehassleofswitchingcardsinthepast.30/76HaveyourfortunetoldforTheYearofTheRooster.RedeemanexclusivefortuneGuide.Career,money,romance,health-whatdoeshaveinstoreforyou?MakLingLingandYauTinYuenhavealltheanswers,Youcanreadtheformer’sFortuneGuideTotheYearoftheRoosterinEnglishatthespecialredemptionpriceof$25,orthelatter’sspecialChineseeditionfor$8.Andyouwillalsoreceiveafreefortunatecrystalbracelet.Byfollowingtheiradvice,youcanenhanceyourgoodluckandavoidillfortuneintheyeartocome.Don’twaituntilit’stoolate!31/76A“whatdoeshaveinstoreforyou?”YouhaveafixeddestinyinB“afreefortunatecrystalbracelet(手镯)”

ThereisacrystalbraceletthatcanbringyouluckC“youcanenhanceyourgoodluckandavoidillfortuneintheyeartocome.”ThereisgoodluckandillfortuneintheyeartocomeGoodluckcanbeenhancedIllfortunecanbeavoidedD“Don’twaituntilit’stoolate!”Youneeditsomeday.32/76Tosummarize,presuppositionsareacrucialpartofadvertisingastheycancausethereadertoconsidertheexistenceofobjects,propositions,andculturallydefinedbehavioralproperties:forexample,"Haveyouhadyourdailyvitamins?"presupposesthatyoutakeorneed"dailyvitamins",therebycreatingandperpetuatingtheideathatthebehavioroftakingvitaminsdailyispartofourculture.Similarly,"What'sgreataboutChuckWagondogfood?"(Geis1982,45)presupposesthatthereissomethinggreataboutthedogfood.33/76PresuppositionIntroductionTheoryDailyUse

AdsAnalysisPresuppositionandEntailmentTypesorTriggers34/76Presupposition:Theinformationthataspeakerassumestobealreadyknown.(TheCambridgeEncyclopaediaofLanguage,1987)

Implicitmeaningsconveyedbythespeakerthroughtheuseofparticularwords.Ex:"TheColdWarhasended"presupposesthattheexistenceoftheentitiesitrefersto,inthiscasethe"ColdWar".35/76Speakers,notsentences,havepresuppositions36/76Entailmentisnotapragmaticconcept.Itisdefinedaswhatlogicallyfollowsfromwhatisassertedintheutterance.

Sentences,notspeakers,haveentailments.37/76Example:

Susan’ssisterboughttwohouses.ThissentencepresupposesthatSusanexistsandthatshehasasister.ThissentencehastheentailmentsthatSusan’ssisterboughtsomething;nowshehas2houses,ahouse,andothersimilarlogicalconsequences.

Theentailmentsarecommunicatedwithoutbeingsaidandarenotdependentonthespeaker’sintention.38/76Presupposition:Therelationshipbetweentwopropositions.Mary’scatiscute.(p)Maryhasacat.(q)p>>q=ppresupposesqIfthespeakerdeniesthepropositionp(NOTp),thepresuppositionqdoesn’tchange.Mary’scatisn’tcute.(NOTp)Maryhasacat.(q)Notp>>q=Notppresupposesq39/76Presupposition:Constancyundernegation:Thepresuppositionofastatementwillremaintrueevenwhenthatstatementisnegated.40/76Presupposition:Otherexamplesofconstancyundernegation:p:DaveisangrybecauseJimcrashedthecar.q:Jimcrashedthecarp>>qNOTp:Daveisn’tangrybecauseJimcrashedthecarq:JimcrashedthecarNOTp>>q41/76Presupposition:p:Mr.Singletonhasresumedhishabitofdrinkingstoutq:Mr.Singletonhadahabitofdrinkingstout.p>>qNOTp:Mr.Singletonhasn’tresumedhishabitofdrinkingstoutq:Mr.Singletonhadahabitofdrinkingstout.NOTp>>q42/76Entailmentsentencesthatstandinanimplicationalrelation,wherethetruthofthefirstguaranteesthetruthofthesecond.Theanarchistassassinatedtheemperor.Theemperordied.So,thefirstsentenceentailsthesecond.43/76A:Everyonepassedtheexamination.B:No-onefailedtheexamination.AentailsB

wheneverAistrue,BistruetheinformationthatBcontainsiscontainedintheinformationthatAconveysasituationdescribablebyAmustalsobeasituationdescribablebyBAandNOTBarecontradictory.44/76Wetakeentailmentrelationstobethosethatspecificallyarisefromlinguisticstructure45/76Generallyspeaking,entailmentisnotapragmaticconcept(i.e.havingtodowiththespeakermeaning),butitisconsideredapurelylogicalconcept.46/76Presuppositionsvs.entailmentsUtterancesandtheir

presuppositions.1)Shehasstoppedsmoking.presupposesSheusedtosmoke.2)Mydogatemybag.presupposesIhaveadog,andIhave(had)abag.Utterancesandtheir

entailments.Theemperorwasassassinated

entails1)Someonewasassassinated.2)Theemperordied.47/76Presuppositionsaredifferentfromentailments.1)

Shehasn’tstoppedsmoking.StillpresupposesSheusedtosmoke.2)Mydogdidn’teatmybag.StillpresupposesIhaveadog,andI(still,itseems)haveabag.

whileTheemperorwasn’tassassinated.Doesnotentailanymore1)Someonewasassassinated.2)Theemperordied.48/76PresuppositionIntroductionTheoryDailyUse

AdsAnalysisPresuppositionandEntailmentTypesorTriggers49/76TypesofPresuppositionPresuppositionsareassociatedwiththeuseofalargenumberofwords,phrasesandstructures.

Theselinguisticformsareconsideredasindicatorsofpotentialpresupposition,whichcanonlybecomeactualpresuppositionincontextswithspeakers.50/761-Existentialpresupposition:Entitiesnamedbythespeakerandassumedtobepresent-nounphrase.-possessiveconstructions“David’scarisnew”wecanpresupposethatDavidexistsandthathehasacar.Somelexicaltriggers:Definitenounphrases:Thestudentfellasleep.Thestudentdidn’tfallasleepDavidisabachelor(Davidisanunmarriedmaleperson)51/762-Factivepresupposition:identifiedbythepresenceofsomeverbssuchas"know“,"realize“,“beglad”,“besorry”,etc.Somelexicaltriggers:Factiveverbs:TracyrealizedPatateasandwich.Patregrettedeatingasandwich.Patlikedeatingasandwich.IwasawareoftheclasscancellationonMondayTheyannouncedthewinnerofthecontest.I’mgladit’sover.Shedidn’trealizethatshewasill.52/763-Lexicalpresupposition:Inusingoneword,thespeakercanactasifanothermeaningwillbeunderstood.Forinstance:Marystoppedrunning.(>>Heusedtorun.)

Youarelateagain.(>>Youwerelatebefore.)Areyoustillsuchabaddriver?(>>Youwereabaddriver)"stop“,"again““still”aretakentopresupposeanother(unstated)concept.Somelexicaltriggers:Changeofstateverbs:Patstoppedeatingasandwich(at2pm).Patstartedeatingasandwich(at2pm).Verbsofjudgment:TracyblamedPatforeatingthesandwich.TracyfaultsPatforeatingthesandwich.SusanisaccusedofX(Xisbad)SusanwascriticizedforX(XisbadandSusandidX)53/764-Structuralpresupposition:itistheassumptionassociatedwiththeuseofcertainstructures.-wh-questionconstructions.WhendidshetraveltotheUSA?(>>shetravelled)

Wheredidyoubuythebook?(>>youboughtthebook)

Thelistenerperceivesthattheinformationpresentedisnecessarilytrue,orintendedastruebythespeaker..54/765-Non-factivepresupposition:itisanassumptionreferredtosomethingthatisnottrue.Forexample,verbslike"dream","imagine"and"pretend"areusedwiththepresuppositionthatwhatfollowsisnottrue.IdreamedthatIwasrich.(>>Iwasnotrich)

WeimaginedthatwewereinLondon.(>>WewerenotinLondon)55/766-Counterfactualpresupposition:itistheassumptionthatwhatispresupposedisnotonlyuntrue,butistheoppositeofwhatistrue,orcontrarytofacts.conditionalstructures,Ifyouweremydaughter,Iwouldnotallowyoutodothis.(>>youarenotmydaughter)IfIwererichIwouldbuyaFerrari(>>I’mnotrich)56/76It-cleftconstruction/cleftsentences: a)ItwasTOMthatdidthework.

b)Itwasn’tMEwhotookyourjacket.57/76Cleftsentencesareusedtohelpusfocusonaparticularpartofthesentenceandtoemphasisewhatwewanttosay…Becausetherearetwoparts…theyarecalledcleft(fromtheverbcleave)whichmeansdividedintotwo.Cleftsentencesareparticularlyusefulinwritingwherewecannotuseintonationforpurposesoffocusoremphasis,buttheyarealsofrequentlyusedinspeech.

Cleftstructuresincludethereasonwhy,thethingthat,theperson/peoplewho,theplacewhere,thedaywhenandwhat-clauseswhichareusuallylinkedtotheclausethatwewanttofocusonwithisorwas.From:BBCWorldservice58/76From"BarclaysWorldwide“,afour-monthlynewsletterforclientsofBarclaysbankwholiveoutsidetheUK.

1998summer-issue,apassageabouttheintroductionoftheEuro,titled"EuroUpdate-Yourquestionsanswered".

Britainmayjoininthelifetimeofafutureparliament

theUKhasnotjoinedsofar

acarefully-expressedappreciationofthevalueofsterling

59/76TheCharacteristicsofPragmaticPresuppositionone-sidedness,subjectivenessandsneakiness(陈新仁,1998).Allthesepropertiesmakepresuppositionsubjective,sneaky,deceptiveandmisleading.60/76FelicityInthiscondition,felicitycanalsoberefereedasappropriateness.Pragmaticpresuppositionisoftenregardedasconditionsforthefelicitoususeofsentencestoperformaspeechact.“AnutteranceApragmaticallypresupposesapropositionBifAisappropriateonlyBismutuallyknownbyparticipants”(Levinson:1983).61/76Thatpersonisnotabachelor--何自然(:113-4)(1)Heismarried.(2)He’sonlysixyearsold.(3)Thepersonisawoman.(4)Thepersonisawoman,whoismarried.(5)Thepersonisaspinster.Theaboveexampleshowsthatpresuppositionmustbeappropriatetothecontextsoastoguaranteethemeaningfulnessoftheutterance.62/76Mutualknowledge“AnutteranceApragmaticallypresupposesapropositionBifAisappropriateonlyifBismutuallyknownbyparticipants”.Canyouclosethewindow?Presuppositionshouldbecommonlyknownoracceptedinformationfortheparticipantsofcommunication,otherwisethehearerwillmisunderstandthespeaker’sutterance.

63/76One-sidednessThisreferstothefactthatthepresuppositionismadeonlybytheaddresser

himselfandthatitexistsonlyinthemindoftheaddresserhimselfbeforethepresuppositionisinterpretedorinferredbytheaddressee.Mutual

knowledge

relatestoutteranceunderstandingwhileone-sidednessrelatestopragmaticpresuppositionitself.

64/76SubjectivenessPragmaticpresuppositionissubjective.Itisakindofcontextassumptionwithanassertivefeature.Itisnotnecessarytrueorcorrect.Pragmaticpresuppositionisdefinedasthebelieforattitudeofthespeakerorhearerconcerningthetruthofaproposition.Itisnotaninevitabletruthbutanassumptionaboutthecontext.

65/76SneakinessPragmaticpresuppositioniscloselyconnectedwiththespeaker'sbelief,attitudeandintention.Inaddition,itcomesfrompeople'sknowledgeabouttheway,inwhichlanguageusersconventionallyinterpretthewordsandstructuresthattriggerit,sopresuppositionisconcealedinaconversationandcanbequite“sneaky”.

Doyoustillbeatyourwife?66/76AnalysisofadvertisementWe

can't

keep

something

this

juicy

a

secret

(Juicy,from

http://www.S.htm).67/76Thisadvertisementcanleaveaverydeepimpressiononthereaders.

Theexistentialpresuppositionistriggeredbythedemonstrativepronoun“this”,whichpresupposesthatthereissomething“thisjuicy”,andthenmakesanassertionaboutit.Oneimportantfunctionofthepresuppositionhereistopromoteakind

温馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
  • 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
  • 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
  • 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
  • 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

评论

0/150

提交评论