未来能源研究所-是时候进行市场升级了吗?未来电力批发市场设计综述(英)_第1页
未来能源研究所-是时候进行市场升级了吗?未来电力批发市场设计综述(英)_第2页
未来能源研究所-是时候进行市场升级了吗?未来电力批发市场设计综述(英)_第3页
未来能源研究所-是时候进行市场升级了吗?未来电力批发市场设计综述(英)_第4页
未来能源研究所-是时候进行市场升级了吗?未来电力批发市场设计综述(英)_第5页
已阅读5页,还剩106页未读 继续免费阅读

下载本文档

版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领

文档简介

TimeforaMarketUpgrade?AReviewofWholesale

ElectricityMarketDesignsfortheFuture

ChiaraLoPrete,KarenPalmer,andMollyRobertson

Report24-09June2024

AbouttheAuthors

ChiaraLoPreteisAssociateProfessorofEnergyEconomicsintheJohnandWillie

LeoneFamilyDepartmentofEnergyandMineralEngineeringatThePennsylvania

StateUniversity.Herresearchcentersontheeconomicsofenergymarkets,with

afocusontheareasofcompetitionanddesignofelectricitymarkets,naturalgas

marketdesigntoenhancegridreliability,geopoliticsandenergysecurity,andthe

impactsofenvironmentalregulationsonelectricpowergeneration.Recentworkhas

centeredonthedevelopmentofmathematicalmodelsandapplicationofempirical

methodstostudyelectricitymarketstructuresforresourceadequacyandwindenergyintegration,interdependentnaturalgasandelectricpowersystems,theweaponizationofelectricitytrade,emissionleakageandcross-productmanipulation.

KarenPalmerisaseniorfellowatResourcesfortheFuture(RFF),directorofthe

ElectricPowerProgram,andanexpertontheeconomicsofenvironmental,climateandpublicutilityregulationoftheelectricpowersector.Herworkseekstoimprovethe

designofenvironmentalandtechnologyregulationsinthesectorandthedevelopmentofnewinstitutionstohelpguidetheongoingtransitionoftheelectricitysector.To

theseends,sheexploresclimatepolicydesign,analyzesefficientwaystopromote

useofrenewableandothercleansourcesofelectricity,andinvestigatesnewmarketdesigns,newapproachestoelectricitypricingandregulatoryreformstopavetheway

forlong-termdecarbonizationofelectricitysupplyandelectrificationoftheenergyeconomy.

MollyRobertsonisaseniorresearchassociateatRFFworkingontopicsrelated

totheelectricpowersector,includinggriddecarbonization,electrification,and

electricitymarketdesign.ShehasalsocontributedtoRFF’sgrowingworkonequitablecommunitytransitionandenvironmentaljustice.Sheholdsamaster’sinpublicpolicyfromtheUniversityofMichigan’sFordSchool.

Acknowledgements

KarenPalmerandMollyRobertsonwishtoacknowledgefundingfromtheRFFElectricPowerProgram.ChiaraLoPretewouldliketoacknowledgefundingfromtheNationalScienceFoundation(Grant1943992).WethankPeterCramton,StevenCorneli,NataliaFabra,EricGimon,MalcolmKeay,DavidNelson,BrendanPierpont,KathleenSpees,

LeighTesfatsion,andFrankWolakforhelpfulfeedback.WealsothankparticipantsintheElectricPowerInnovationinaCarbonFreeSociety(EPICS)Thrust3workshopforhelpfulcomments.

ResourcesfortheFuturei

AboutRFF

ResourcesfortheFuture(RFF)isanindependent,nonprofitresearchinstitutionin

Washington,DC.Itsmissionistoimproveenvironmental,energy,andnaturalresourcedecisionsthroughimpartialeconomicresearchandpolicyengagement.RFFis

committedtobeingthemostwidelytrustedsourceofresearchinsightsandpolicysolutionsleadingtoahealthyenvironmentandathrivingeconomy.

TheviewsexpressedherearethoseoftheindividualauthorsandmaydifferfromthoseofotherRFFexperts,itsofficers,oritsdirectors.

SharingOurWork

OurworkisavailableforsharingandadaptationunderanAttribution-

NonCommercial-NoDerivatives4.0International(CCBY-NC-ND4.0)license.Youcancopyandredistributeourmaterialinanymediumorformat;youmustgive

appropriatecredit,providealinktothelicense,andindicateifchangesweremade,andyoumaynotapplyadditionalrestrictions.Youmaydosoinanyreasonable

manner,butnotinanywaythatsuggeststhelicensorendorsesyouoryouruse.Youmaynotusethematerialforcommercialpurposes.Ifyouremix,transform,orbuilduponthematerial,youmaynotdistributethemodifiedmaterial.Formoreinformation,visit

/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

.

TimeforaMarketUpgrade?AReviewofWholesaleElectricityMarketDesignsfortheFutureii

Abstract

Existingwholesaleelectricitymarketdesignsarepoorlysuitedtoaddresschallengesassociatedwiththeevolvingresourcemix.Forexample,recentscarcityeventsin

theUnitedStatesshowthatreliabilitychallengesinrenewable-andgas-dominated

electricpowersystemsarisenotfromthelackofgenerationcapacitytoservepeak

customerdemand,butfromthelackofavailablecapacitytoprovidetherequisite

energyattimesofneed.Wereview11proposedelectricitymarketdesignsforthe

cleanenergytransitionandcomparethembasedon10criteria.Enhancingreliabilityinelectricpowersystemswithasignificantamountofvariablerenewableenergyrequiresincentivizingresourceflexibility,bothininvestmentandinoperation.Electricity

marketstructuresshouldallowresourcesneededforreliabilitytoearnadequate

revenuestorecovertheirvariableandfixedcosts.Goodmarketdesignsalsoenable

low-costfinancingtosupportinvestmentsincapital-intensiveresourcesthatare

instrumentalinmeetingdecarbonizationobjectives.Anadditionalpropertyofwell-

designedmarketsispromotingshort-runefficiencybyreducingincentivestoexercisemarketpowerandsupportingefficientrenewablecurtailmentoutcomes.Besides

achievingreliability,long-runefficiency,andshort-runefficiency,someproposalsin

ourreviewseektoachieveenergyaffordabilityobjectivesandintegrationwithclean

energygoals.Ourevaluationhighlightsseveralopenquestionsanddirectionsfor

futureresearch:thedeterminationofmandatorypurchaseobligationsofload-servingentitiesandassociatedenforcementmechanisms;theinterplaybetweenlong-term

hedgingrequirementsandincentivesfordemandparticipationinrealtime;andthe

compatibilitybetweenlong-termcontractdesignandefficientoperationsinshort-termenergymarkets.

ResourcesfortheFutureiii

Contents

1.Introduction1

2.TraditionalApproachestoResourceAdequacyandRevenueSufficiency5

2.1.ScarcityPricing5

2.2.CapacityRemunerationMechanisms6

2.2.1.CapacityPayments6

2.2.2.CapacityRequirements6

2.2.3.CapacityMarkets7

2.2.4.ReliabilityOptions7

2.2.5.StrategicReserves8

2.2.6.IncentivizingCapacityPerformance9

3.EvolvingMarketApproachestoSupportReliability,Flexibility,andPrice

Certainty10

3.1.FlexibleCapacityRequirements10

3.2.SeasonalForwardCapacityMarkets11

3.3.BasicGenerationService12

4.ProposedApproachestoMeettheChallengesoftheCleanEnergyTransition14

4.1.AnIntegratedCleanCapacityMarket14

4.2.StandardizedFixed-PriceForwardContracts16

4.3.AForwardEnergyMarketwithFlowTrading18

4.4.ATwo-PartMarketforEnergy21

4.5.AMarketforLong-TermEnergyContracts22

4.6.Long-TermContractsBasedontheAttributesofGenerationTechnologies24

4.7.Market-BasedIntegratedResourcePlanning26

4.8.AnOrganizedLong-TermMarket28

4.9.DualShort-TermMarketDesigns29

4.10.SwingContracts32

5.Discussion36

6.Conclusions41

References43

TimeforaMarketUpgrade?AReviewofWholesaleElectricityMarketDesignsfortheFutureiv

1.Introduction

Independentsystemoperators(ISOs),regionaltransmissionorganizations(RTOs),

andelectricutilitiesservingasbalancingauthoritiesmustensuretherearesufficient

resourcestomeettheelectricitydemandofend-usecustomersatalltimes,accountingforscheduledandreasonablyexpectedunscheduledoutagesofsystemelementsandsubjecttostandardindustrytargetsforlossofload,suchasthe“onedayintenyear”lossofloadexpectation1Thisconceptisreferredtoasresourceadequacy(NARUC,

2023;NERC,2013).

Toachieveresourceadequacy,bothtraditionallyregulatedandcompetitivewholesaleelectricitymarketshaveadoptedframeworkstoaddresstwowell-knownproblems:

themissingmoneyproblemandthemissingmarketproblem(Newbery,2016;Wolak,

2022).Themissingmoneyproblemarisesbecauserevenuesfromtheenergyand

ancillaryservicesmarketsarenotsufficienttoencourageadequateinvestmentin

newgenerationcapacity(CramtonandOckenfels,2012).Forexample,duringscarcityconditions,short-termenergypricesareunlikelytorisetopoliticallyunpalatablelevelsreflectingtheestimatedamountthatcustomerswouldbewillingtopaytoavoida

powerdisruption(RoquesandFinon,2017).Ontheotherhand,themissingmarket

problemresultsfromtheretailers’incentivetodelaytheirelectricitypurchasesto

theshort-termenergymarket.Thisarisesfortworeasons.First,pricecapsinthe

short-termenergymarketlimitthecostoffailingtoprocureadequateenergytomeetexpecteddemandbeforedelivery.Second,duringscarcityconditions,retailersare

randomlycurtailedregardlessoftheamountofenergyprocuredintheforwardmarket,creatinganincentivetounder-procureexpectedneedsintheforwardmarket(Wolak,2022).Thegapbetweenmaturitiesoflong-termcontracts(thatgenerallydonotextend

1InApril1996,theFederalEnergyRegulatoryAgency(FERC)issuedOrders888and889,whereitintroducedtheconceptofanISOto“operatethetransmissionsystemsofpublicutilitiesinamannerthatisindependentofanybusinessinterestinsalesorpurchasesofelectricpowerbythoseutilities”andtofacilitatenondiscriminatoryaccesstotheelectrictransmissiongrid.FERCOrder2000,issuedinDecember1999,encouragedtransmission-owningpublicutilitiestovoluntarilyformandparticipateinanRTOandestablishedasetof12technicalrequirementstoobtainRTOstatus.WhilesomedifferencesexistbetweenISOsandRTOs(forexample,ISOsareformedatthedirectionorrecommendationoftheFERCanddonotpetitiontheFERCforapprovalandthusmaynotmeettherequirementsneededtoholdthedesignationofRTO),theirbasicfunctionsarethesameandincludeoperatingtheelectricgridwithinadefinedregion,ensuringnondiscriminatoryaccess

totransmission,optimallydispatchinggenerationassetstokeepdemandandsupply

inbalance,administeringtheregion’swholesaleelectricitymarkets,andensuringgridreliability.Intherestofthepaper,wewilluseRTOstorefertobothtypesoforganizations.

TimeforaMarketUpgrade?AReviewofWholesaleElectricityMarketDesignsfortheFuture

1

beyondafewyears;Keppleretal.,2022)andtimeframesforinvestingingenerationcapacityincreasesthecostofcapitalanddistortstheenergymixtowardlesscapital-intensiveandlessriskygenerationtechnologies(NeuhoffandDeVries,2004).2

Resourceadequacyframeworksattempttoaddresstheseproblemsinvariousways.

Verticallyintegratedutilitiesoperatingintraditionallyregulatedmarketsadopta

centralizedprocurementframework.Indecentralizedprocurementregionslikethe

CaliforniaIndependentSystemOperator(CAISO)andSouthwestPowerPool(SPP),

load-servingentities(LSEs)haveanobligationtoindividuallyprocurethecapacity

theyneedtomeettheircustomers’demand.Obligationsaresubjecttoguidance

andstandardssetbyacentralauthority,butthereisnocentralbiddingprocess.The

ElectricReliabilityCouncilofTexas(ERCOT)reformeditsenergymarketsothatpeakpricesbetterreflectthescarcityofcapacity,whileotherregionslikeISONewEngland(ISO-NE),theMidcontinentIndependentSystemOperator(MISO),theNewYork

IndependentSystemOperator(NYISO),andPJMcreatedmechanismsthatprovide

additionalremunerationforcapacityontopofenergysalesthroughcentralizedforwardcapacitymarkets.

Despitemanydifferencesamongtheseapproaches,alltraditionalresourceadequacymechanismsfocusonprocuringsufficientgenerationcapacitytoservepeak

demandplusareservemargin.3Whilesuchapproacheshavebeensuccessfulat

maintainingresourceadequacyinthermalgeneration–dominatedsystemsunder

mostcontingencies,theyarepoorlysuitedtoaddresschallengesassociatedwiththe

evolvingresourcemix.Forexample,evidencefromrecentscarcityeventsintheUnitedStatesshowsthatreliabilitychallengesinrenewable-andgas-dominatedelectricpowersystemsarisenotfromthelackofgenerationcapacitytoservepeakcustomerdemand,butfromthelackofavailablecapacitytoprovidetherequisiteenergyattimesofneed.Inotherwords,supplyshortfallsareathigherriskofoccurringbecauseofinadequateenergytoservedemandduringnetdemandpeaks,ratherthanbecauseofinadequategenerationcapacitytosatisfysystemdemandpeaks(NERC,2020;ESIG,2021).

Highpenetrationofrenewableenergysourcesalsoexacerbatesthelong-standing

missingmoneyproblembecauseincreasedentryofvariableenergyresources(VERs)withnear-zeromarginalcostsdecreasestheamountofthermalgenerationcleared

fromthemerit-orderstackandinduceslowercapacityfactorsforthermalgenerators.Inaddition,energypricestendtobelower(onaverage)andmorevolatileasaresultofincreasingVERparticipation(Mallapragadaetal.,2023).Between2014and2020,

2Long-termcontractsaretradedonorganizedexchangeslikeIntercontinentalExchange(ICE,2024),butliquidityisconcentratedinshorterperiods,withonlysmallamounts

tradedmorethan2or3yearsout.Contractsformorethan5yearsarerareandusuallytradedoverthecounter.Asapointofreference,constructiontimesrangefrom2yearsforanaturalgascombinedcycleplantto3-4yearsforacoalplantto10yearsfora

nuclearplant,andagenerationunit’slifetimemaybe20ormoreyearsafterthefinalinvestmentdecision.

3Insomecases,capacitycommitmentshavesignificantlyexceededthetargetreservemargins,resultinginchronicover-procurementandnegativecostimpactsforthe

consumers(Wilsonetal.,2020).

ResourcesfortheFuture2

generationresourcesinsomeregionsoftheUnitedStateshaveobserveddiminishingenergymarketearningsandagreatercontributionofcapacitymarketrevenuestotherecoveryofinvestmentcosts(Figure1).4Thistrendisproblematicbecausecapacity

marketsdonotprovidethenecessaryincentivestoinvestinanadequateamountandmixofflexiblegenerationtomeetevolvingsystemneeds(PJMInterconnection,2017b).Additionally,pricevolatilitycreatesgreaterrevenueuncertaintyforvariableresources,whichinturnraisesfinancingcostsforcapital-intensivegeneratorssuchasrenewables(PierpontandNelson,2017).

Figure1.ComponentsofPJMPrice

Source:AuthorelaborationondatafromMonitoringAnalytics(2023a,2023c,2024).

Someresearchersandanalystsarguethatdeepdecarbonizationofelectricitysystemswillrequireashiftawayfromthetextbookelectricitymarketdesigninwhichlong-terminvestmentdecisionsaredrivenbyshort-termenergyprices.Forexample,Roques

andFinon(2017)suggestanevolutionofmarketdesigntowardahybridregimewhere“competitionforthemarket”vialong-termcontractstosupportinvestmentwould

befollowedby“competitioninthemarket”forshort-termdispatchandbalancing

operationsasatpresent.AnexampleofhybridmarketscombinesmandatesforLSEstoenterintolong-termbilateralpowerpurchaseagreements(PPAs)withrenewablepowergeneratorsandstorage(whichareoftenmediatedthroughcompetitive

procurementprograms;Joskow,2022)anddispatchofthenewgenerationcapacityinshort-runenergymarkets.Keppleretal.(2022)furtherelaborateonthemotivationforhybridmarkets.

4Theincreaseinenergymarketearningsobservedin2021and2022waslargelydrivenbytheupwardtrendinnaturalgasprices(EIA,2024).

TimeforaMarketUpgrade?AReviewofWholesaleElectricityMarketDesignsfortheFuture3

Thispaperpresentsareviewofelectricitymarketdesignstosupporttheclean

energytransition.Meetingsystemreliabilitychallengesassociatedwithincreasing

levelsofrenewablegenerationrequiresincentivizingresourceflexibility,bothin

investmentandinoperation.Electricitymarketstructuresshouldbedesignedto

allowresourcesneededforreliabilitytoearnsufficientrevenuestorecovertheirfixedandvariablecosts.Goodmarketdesignsshouldalsoenablelow-costfinancingto

supportinvestmentsincapital-intensiveresourcesthatareinstrumentalinmeetingdecarbonizationobjectives.Anadditionalpropertyofwell-designedmarketsis

promotingshort-runefficiencybyreducingincentivestoexercisemarketpowerandsupportingefficientrenewablecurtailmentoutcomes.Besidesreliability,long-run

efficiency,andshort-runefficiency,electricitymarketsmayseektoachieveequity

objectives(e.g.,lowercostsofrenewablegenerationmustbepassedthroughtoretailcustomers)andinsomecasesmaybeintegratedwithcleanenergygoals.

Ourworkbuildsonthreerecentreviewsofelectricitymarketdesign.Bhagwat,

DeVries,etal.(2016)surveyUScapacitymarketexpertswiththepurposeof

drawinglessonsfortheEUandconcludethatUScapacitymarketshaveachievedreliabilitygoalsinaneconomicallyinefficientmannerbecausetheytendtoleadtoexcessgenerationcapacity.Asaresult,consumershavenotbenefitedfromtheimplementationofcapacitymarketsintermsofloweroverallcosts.Bublitzetal.

(2019)discusscapacityremunerationmechanismsfromacrosstheglobeandreviewexperienceswiththem.Theynotethat“astheadequatedesigndependsonavarietyoffactorssuchastheexistingcapacitymixanddemandcharacteristics,nogeneral

advantageousnessofsingle(capacityremuneration)mechanismscouldbedeterminedsofar.…Nevertheless,itcanbeconcludedthatmarket-basedmechanisms,e.g.,a

forwardcapacitymarket,areusuallyadvantageouscomparedtointerventionist

mechanismssuchascapacitypayments”(2019,1074).Duggan(2020)reviewsthe

literaturethatevaluatestherelativeperformanceofvariouscapacitymechanisms,

includingthe“energy-only”marketapproach.HediscussesrecentdevelopmentsindifferentRTOmarkets,whichheconcludescollectivelyindicatethatexperimentationoncapacityremunerationforresourceadequacysupportisanongoingprocess.Wecontributetothisliteraturebybroadeningthefocustoincludeproposedelectricitymarketdesigns,andbyprovidingacomprehensivereviewandcomparisonoftheseoptionsbasedonkeymetrics.

Therestofthepaperproceedsasfollows.Thenextsectionreviewstraditional

approachestoensureresourceadequacyandrevenuesufficiency,includingscarcitypricingandarangeofcapacitymechanisms.Section3discussesevolvingUSmarketapproachestosupportreliability,incentivizeflexibility,andprovideforwardprice

certaintytomeetloadrequirementsofeligiblecustomers.Thepaperthenturnsin

Section4toadiscussionof11proposeddesignsthatofferpotentialsolutionsto

thechallengesfacedbyelectricitymarketsintheUnitedStatesandabroad.We

comparethedesignsbasedontheirpotentialabilitytosupportthedevelopmentofreliablemixesofgenerationresources,promoteefficientlong-andshort-runresourceallocation,andhelpachieveenergyaffordabilityanddecarbonizationobjectives.

Section5highlightsopenquestionsanddirectionsforfutureresearch.Section6providesconcludingremarks.

ResourcesfortheFuture4

2.TraditionalApproachestoResource

AdequacyandRevenueSufficiency

2.1.ScarcityPricing

AllRTOsintheUnitedStatesusesomeformofscarcitypricingtoincentivize

availabilityduringtimesofneed(Mehrtashetal.,2023).Scarcitypricingallowsenergyorancillaryservicespricestoriseabovetheaveragevariablecostofalloperating

plantswhenthesystemiscapacity-constrained.Insuchinstances,unitsearnashort-runprofit,knownasscarcityrent.Asufficientnumberofscarcityhourswouldincreasethecumulativescarcityrentsearnedbyoperatingunits,andfirmswouldinvestin

newcapacityaslongastheexpectedcumulativescarcityrentsexceededthecosts

ofbuildingnewcapacity(Bublitzetal.,2019).However,theexistenceofpricecaps

andlackofshort-termprice-responsivedemandposepracticalchallengesinthe

implementationofscarcitypricinginreal-worldelectricitymarkets.Toaddressthese

challenges,marketshaveamendedtheirpricingmechanismstogeneratehighprices

whenoperatingreservesarescarce.Forexample,inERCOT,theonlygridoperatorin

theUnitedStatesthatreliesonan“energy-only”market,pricesforbothenergyand

ancillaryservicesriseabovetheofferpricesofgenerationunitswhenreservemarginsarelow.Pricesintimesofscarcityarebasedonanoperatingreservedemandcurvethatreflectsthesystemoperator’sdemandforreserves(Hogan,2005).5Thismechanism

providesincentivesfortheperformanceofgenerationcapacityundermostoperatingconditions(PotomacEconomics,2021),althoughaftertheFebruary2021outagesinTexas,criticsarguedthattheenergy-onlyparadigmfailstoensureadequatelevelsofinstalledcapacityandmaintainreliabilityunderstressconditions(Borreson,2022).6

Aspartoftheredesignofthestate’senergy-onlymarketinthewakeofWinterStormUri,inJanuary2023thePublicUtilityCommissionofTexas(PUCT)endorsedthe

performancecreditmechanism(PCM)toincentivizegeneratorstobeavailableduringtimesofhighdemand.Thenewmarketmechanismawardscreditstogeneratorsattheendofacomplianceperiod,basedontheiravailabilityattimesofgridstress.Utilitieshaveanobligationtopurchasecreditsbasedontheirshareofsystemloadduringhighreliabilityriskhours.InFebruary2024,ERCOTfiledamemorandumlayingoutoptionsfordesignparametersandaproposedevaluationmethodologytoselectthefinal

parameters(PUCT,2024).ThePUCTisexpectedtoadoptrulesregardingPCMinthefirsthalfof2025.

5ERCOTdoesnotcurrentlyco-optimizeprovisionofenergyandoperatingreservesinrealtime,althoughco-optimizationisexpectedtobeimplementedby2025(Mehrtashetal.,2023).Asaresult,thereservepriceisdeterminedexpostandaddedtothereal-time

energypricetoprovideadditionalrevenuestorecoverfixedandvariablecosts.

6Itisunclearwhetheranyalternativemarketstructureswouldhaveprovidedbetter

incentivesforpowersupplierstoweatherizeagainsttheextremecold-weatherconditionsobservedinTexas,relativetoan“energy-only”market(Busbyetal.,2021;Palmerand

Cleary,2021).

TimeforaMarketUpgrade?AReviewofWholesaleElectricityMarketDesignsfortheFuture

5

2.2.CapacityRemunerationMechanisms

Inadditiontoscarcitypricing,resourceadequacyconcernsmayalsobeaddressedthroughcapacityremunerationmechanismswherebygenerationunitsearnrevenuestreamsforcapacityinadditiontorevenuesearnedthroughthesaleofenergyandancillaryservices.Awiderangeofoptionsincludescapacitypayments,capacity

requirements,capacitymarkets,reliabilityoptions,andstrategicreserves.

2.2.1.CapacityPayments

Capacitypaymentsawardgeneratorsanadministrativelydeterminedpriceforcapacitymadeavailabletothesystem.ThesemechanismshavebeeninplaceforyearsinSpain,Italy,Greece,Chile,Colombia,Peru,andSouthKorea,andtheymaybefixedorvariable,aswellastargeted(i.e.,paidexclusivelytonewgenerationcapacity)ormarket-wide

(i.e.,paidtobothnewandexistinggenerationcapacity).Absentacompetitiveprocess,themajorchallengeistheidentificationofthecorrectleveloftheper-unitcapacity

payment.Capacitypaymentsarethereforelikelytobetheleastefficienttypeofcapacitymechanism(EuropeanCommission,2016).

2.2.2.CapacityRequirements

InsomeregionsoftheUnitedStates(CAISOandSPP),capacityrequirementsmandatethatLSEsprocureanadministrativelydeterminedquantityofcapacityfromgenera

温馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
  • 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
  • 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
  • 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
  • 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

评论

0/150

提交评论