Apple 化学品管理项目评估报告

"CMPAssessmentReport

化学品管理项目评估报告",,,,,,

,"Scorecard

记分卡",,,,,

,"Part

分项","Element

要素","DocumentReview

文件审核","FieldInspection

现场检查","PersonnelInterview

员工访谈","Score

分数"

,1,"ChemicalInventory

化学品清单",17,19,4,40

,2,"RiskAssessment

风险评估",18,16,2,36

,3,"RiskControl

风险控制",15,25,10,50

,4,"HazardCommunication

危害告知",20,12,2,34

,5,"ChemicalManagementTraining

化学品管理培训",21,,12,33

,6,"MedicalSurveillance

健康监护",19,,0,19

,7,"ChemicalHandling

化学品操作",13,26,15,54

,8,"EmergencyResponse

应急响应",39,15,5,59

,"Total

总计",,,,,41

,Score≥80,,"High

高",,,

,60≤Score<80,,"Medium

中",,,

,Score<60,,"Low

低",,,

,"OverallSummary

项目总结",,,,,

,"A3-daychemicalmanagementprogramassessmentforSeacoDongguanwasconductedonDecember14-16,2016.Thepurposeofthisassessmentwastoevaluateeffectivenessofsupplier'schemicalmanagementprogramandtohelpsuppliersidentifyareasforimprovement.Eightelementsofchemicalmanagementwereevaluatedandtheassessmentofeachelementconsistsofdocumentreview,fieldinspection,andpersonnelinterviews.Seaco'sEHSmanagementsystemwasatthebeginningstageandunderdevelopment,andthechemicalmanagementprogramwasbasicandfragmented.Abasicchemicalinventorywasdevelopedandupdatedperiodically.Abasichazardcommunicationprogramwasdevelopedandimplemented.Medicaltestingwasofferedtoaportionofworkersexposedtochemicals&physicalagents.Emergencyresponsedrillsandexerciseswereconductedandsomeemergencyresponseequipment&facilitiesweregenerallymaintainedasscheduled.Examplesofdeviationsfoundduringthisassessmentwere:incompletechemicalinventorywithmissinginformationsuchasjobtaskdescription,maximumallowablestoragelimit,andexposedpopulation,useofApplerestrictedchemicals,nonewchemicalreviewingandapprovingprocess,noriskassessmentonchemicalhazards,noengineeringcontrolprogramandinadequateengineeringcontrolsforhazardouschemicalhandling,missingchemicallabelsandchemicalhazardsnotcommunicatedtoaffectedworkers,nochemicaltrainingprovidedtoworkers,medicalsurveillanceprogramnotimplementedtocoverallaffectedworkersandallrequirements,nochemicalhandlingSOPs,andlackoftrainingonemergencyresponseanddeficienciesintheemergencyresponseplan.

在2016年14-16日，对海宏科技有限公司（以下简称海宏公司）进行了为期3天的化学品管理体系评估。其目的是评估其管理体系的有效性和帮助供应商找到需改善的地方。评估了化学品管理的8个要素，每个要素均作了文件查阅、现场调查和人员访谈。海宏公司的EHS管理体系处于初始建立状态，化学品管理体系非常基本和零碎。建立了基本的化学品清单并定期更新，简历和贯彻了一个基本的危害告知程序。向部分员工提供了职业健康体检。举行了应急演练和维保了部分应急响应设备设施。评估中也发现了一些不足：化学品清单不全面，缺失许多重要信息如工作岗位/任务描述，最大允许储存量和暴露人群等，使用了苹果禁止使用的化学品如正己烷，无新化学品评估审核程序，未对化学品的危害进行风险评估，未建立工程控制程序，危险化学品操作的工程控制设施缺失，部分化学品容器无标签和员工危害告知没有到位，未给接触化学品的员工提供培训，职业健康体检只覆盖部分员工和只针对岗中阶段，化学品操作规程尚未建立，应急培训不足和应急预案诸多方面不完善。",,,,,

,"ElementSummary

分项要素总结",,,,,

,"PartNo.

分项","Element

要素","Summary

总结",,,

,1,"ChemicalInventory

化学品清单","Seacohasestablishedabasicchemicalinventory,however,thechemicallistdidnotcoverallthechemicalsinthesite,thechemicallistisnotacomprehensivechemicalinventoryformanagingchemicalrisks,someimprotantinformationwasmissingsuchasjobtaskdescription,maximumallowablestoragelimit,exposedpopulation,occupationalexposurelimtis,methodofuse,frequencyofuse,androuteofexposure.Thepersonwhoestablishedthechemicalinventorydidnotreceivetrainingtoperformthejobwell,tocollectallthenecessaryinformationasrequired.Seacoalsoestablishedthechemicalmanagementprocedure,buttherewasnonewchemicalintroductionprocess,theactualimplementationwasnotincompliancewiththechemicalmanagementprocedure.Seacopeopledon'tknowtherequirementaboutApplerestrictedsubstances.N-hexaneandtoluenewereusedinSeaco.

东莞海宏科技有限公司制定了该公司的化学品清单，但该清单并没有包括所有正在使用的化学品，化学品清单上的信息也不齐全，很多重要的信息缺失，例如：工作岗位/任务描述，最大允许储存量，暴露人群，职业暴露限值，使用方法，使用频率，化学品暴露途径等。制定化学品清单的人员没有全面的知识来准确地收集化学品清单上所需的各类信息。该公司制定了《化学品管理程序》，但实际的执行情况与程序中所要求的内容基本不符合，尚无关于新化学品引进的批准流程。该公司的相关人员尚不清楚苹果公司关于限制使用的化学品方面的要求，工艺制程中仍然在使用含有甲苯、正己烷的溶剂用于清洗，未建立针对工艺过程中使用的清洗剂、去脂剂、脱模剂进行成分分析检测的机制。",,,

,2,"RiskAssessment

风险评估","Seacohasnotestablishedariskassessmentprogram,thustherewasnoanyriskassessementperformedfortheworkactivitiesinthesite.Seacohasretaineda3rdpartytoconductassessmentofcontrolmeasuresforoccupationalhealthhazardsassessementassuggestedinanAppleaudit,however,alltherecommendationsraisedinthisreportwerenotfollowed.Seacoalsoperformedtheannualworkplacequantativeexposuremonitoring,thiswasalldonebya3rdpartybasedonthepreviousassessmentreport,astherewasnofull-timeEHSstaffinthesite,nobodyhastheknowledgeabouthowtoidentifytheoccupationhealthandsafetyrisksanddevelopanannualmonitoringplan,andselectairsamplingmethods.Therewasnoevidencetoindicatethattheairsamplingresultswerecommunicatedtotheaffectedworkers.Noactionplansweredevelopedbasedontheexposureassessmentresults.Therewerenotrackingmechanismeitherforimplementingcontrolstominimizehealthandsafetyrisksofworkplaces.

东莞海宏科技有限公司尚未建立风险评估的机制，该公司没有专职的EHS管理人员，没有人清楚应该如何针对工作场所存在的职业危害因素制定相应的年度检测计划。该公司曾经依照苹果公司提出的改善建议请有资质的公司做了职业危害控制效果评价，但该评价报告中所识别出来的需要改善的问题并没有得到有效的落实。该公司有做年度工作场所职业危害因素监测，监测结果没有公示给员工。没有基于化学品定性评估后而形成的跟进措施项去控制工作场所的健康与安全风险.",,,

,3,"RiskControl

风险控制","Seacoappliedsomemeasurestocontrolchemicalexposurerisks,eg:PPE.However,therewasnowrittenengineeringcontrolprogramwiththeuseofsubstitution,isolation,containment,andventilationmethods.Thereweresomeworkplaceswithnoanyventilationsystemsfortheoperatorstohandlethosehazardouschemicals.SeacoestablishedthePPEmanagementprocedureandPPEwasprovidedforworkerswhomayexposetochemicals.However,therewasnodocumentaboutPPEneedsassessmentbasedontheriskpresentinworkplaces.Gapswereobservedinrespiratorsandglovesselection,use,care,andmaintenance.Operatorswerenottrainedonhowtowear,careandmaintainPPEproperly,therewasnoestablishedrespiratorcartridgereplaceschedule.About20%ofworkersdidnotweartherequiredPPEduringthefieldinspection.Seacodidnotdevelopamanagementprocedureforfire/explosionprevention.Firefightingpermitforchemicalwarehousewasnotobtained.

东莞海宏科技有限公司针对生产过程中的安全健康风险采取了一些措施加以控制，例如PPE，但是该公司没有关于工程控制方面的管理程序，尚无证据表明该公司采取了替代、隔离、工业通风以及劳动防护用品的理念来控制风险。尚存在工作现场员工在操作有毒有害化学品的工作岗位无任何局部通风设施的情况。该公司建立了劳动防护用品管理程序，但该程序中没有明确提及何种岗位需要佩戴的劳动防护用品，存在劳动防护用品选择不正确、员工没有得到相应的培训、员工不了解正确佩戴劳动防护用品的情况。现场走访能发现若干不按照规定佩戴劳动防护用品情况。

防火防爆方面，该公司没有建立相关的防火防爆管理制度。危险化学品储存仓库未获得消防批文。",,,

,4,"HazardCommunication

危害告知","Seacohasdevelopedahazardcommunicationprogram,andMSDSswereavailablefor90%ofchemicals.However,alltheseMSDSswerenotincompliancewiththeGHSstandard,somehazardousingredientswerenotshownontheMSDSs.ItwasobservedbottledwatercontainerswereusedaschemicalpackagingmaterialsfortheA/Bcleaningagent,manychemicalcontainersdidnothaveformalchemicallabelandproperwarningstatments.Thereareoccupationalhealthriskhazardcommunicationnotificationcardintheworkplace,butthecontentdidnotmatchthechemicalsonsite.SeacodidnotconductthehazardcommunicationtrainingtotherelevantworkersasrequiredintheirHAZCOMprogram.TheinterviewedpersondidnotknowhowtogettheMSDSforthosechemicalshandled,operatorsdidn'tknowthesignsandsymbolsmeaningoftheMSDSandchemicallabels.InterviewedEHSprofessionalswerenotfamilarwithhazardclassificationandriskdetermination.

东莞海宏科技有限公司建立料《危害沟通程序》，约90%的化学品MSDS可以获取到，但MSDS都不是符合国家规范的GHS版本MSDS。工作场所储存的化学品存在没有正规的化学品标签、使用矿泉水来盛装A/B处理剂。许多装化学品的容器无化学品标签和危害声明。瓶部分工作场所张贴的“职业危害告知”内容不正确。该公司没有依照《危害沟通程序》中所提及的“每年对相关员工进行危害沟通培训”执行，采访员工发现，员工尚不清楚应该如何获取到自己操作的化学品的MSDS，不清楚化学品标签上面的图标含义的情况。采访EHS负责人，她尚不清楚危险化学品分类的方法以及如何判别某种化学品的危险性。

",,,

,5,"ChemicalManagementTraining

化学品管理培训","Seacosetupvariousgoals,objectivesandKPIsforthesiteoperations,however,alltheseKPIsdidnotcoverthehealthandsafetyaspects,therewerenofull-timeEHSprofessionalsinthesite.TherewerenoresourcesinthecompanytobuildupEHSmanagementcapabilitiesforthelinemanagersandsupervisors.Seacohasestablishedatrainingprogram,buttherewasnotrainingmatrixwithtrainingrequirementsofchemicalmanagementforaffectedemployees.Byreviewingthetrainingrecords,somechemicalrelevanttrainingwasconducted,however,thetrainingmaterialsdidnotcoverthechemicalinventory,chemicalclssification,chemicalhazards,basicknowledgeofMSDSandlabel,andPPE.Trainingonchemicalinventory,riskassessment,riskcontrol,medicalsurveillanceandchemicalhandlingneedstobedeliveredtoaffectedemployeesandprogramadministrators.

东莞海宏科技有限公司建立了用于监控日常运作的各项目标指标，但这些目标指标中尚不涵盖与安全和健康相关的内容，公司没有配备专职的安全、环保、健康管理人员。该公司目前尚不具备足够资源来支持公司的管理层、各级经理和主管以及EHS相关人员获取到专业的安全健康管理知识和能力。通过查看培训记录了解到，该公司进行了一些与化学品管理相关的培训，但培训材料的内容未能涵盖本次评估的诸多方面，通过采访员工也印证料培训不到位的情况,该公司仍然需要进一步就化学品清单、风险评估、医疗监护、化学品操作等方面做深入的培训。",,,

,6,"MedicalSurveillance

健康监护","Seacoestablishedamedicalsurveillanceprogram,however,theactualimplementationwasnotincompliancewiththewrittenprogram.Seacoonlyofferedthemedicalsurveillancetestingtoaportionofworkerswithexposurestothechemicalandphysicalagentssuchasnoise.Seacodidnotprovidepre-placementandexitmedicaltestsfortheworkersthatshouldbeincludedinmedicalsurveillanceprogram.Seacodidnotdevelopapreparationinstructionbasedonvariousmedicaltestingrequirementsandcommunicatedthepreparationreuirementstoaffectedworkers.Interviewedworkerswerenotnotifiedoftheresultsandsignedonthereportstoacknowledgethereceiptofthereports.Follow-upexaminationswerenotarrangedforworkerswithabnormaltestingresults.Theincidentofleftfootinjury,happenedonFeb.26,2016,wasnotinvestigatedandincidentinvestigationreportwasnotfoundandcorrectiveactionswerenotdevelopedandimplemented.Medicalsurveillanceprogramadministratorwasnotfamiliarwithrelevantregulations,standards,andpractices.

东莞海宏科技有限公司针对员工医疗监护的领域制定了相关的管理规定，但该规定并没有得到有效的执行。目前仅有少部分员工参加了岗中年度职业健康体检，尚未执行岗前和离岗职业健康体检。参加职业健康体检的员工没有获得体检前的准备注意事项通知，也没有收到书面的体检结果，需要进行职业健康体检复查的四名员工均未参加复查。该公司对于发生过的工伤事故，仅进行了必要的工伤事故认定和治疗，并没有采用专业的事故调查方法进行深入有效的调查从而找出根本原因，没有制定行之有效的纠正预防措施并得到彻底的跟进。负责员工职业健康体检的员工并不清楚有关的法律法规和标准。

",,,

,7,"ChemicalHandling

化学品操作","Seacodidnotdevelopedchemicalhandlingprocedures:forexample:noprocedureformoldcleaningoperationsandA/Bgluepreparationoperations.Itisobservedthatthemoldcleaningworkwasconductedoutdoors,thechemicalcontainerwithnolabelwhileoperatorwashandlingit.Operatorswerenotawareofthechemicalhazards,theyalsodidnotknowthehazardouswastedisposalandstoragetreatmentrequirement.Beverageanddrinkingwaterbottleswerefoundinmanyworkstations.Somechemicalhandlingtaskswereconductedintheworkplacewithoutanyventilationsystem.TherewasnodocumentedrequirementsaboutthePPEforthechemicalhandlingactivities.

该公司没有对员工所从事的化学品操作工作制定相应的标准操作规程，走访工作场所发现，存在员工在露天环境下使用化学品清洗模具、操作的化学品储存容器上无化学品标签的情况，员工对于自己所操作的化学品危害情况不清楚，不知道相关危废处理方面的要求，工作场所存在员工喝饮用水以及吃东西的行为。员工从事化学品操作的工作地点没有任何通风设施，对于所从事的化学品操作工作，没有关于应该佩戴何种PPE的书面要求。",,,

,8,"EmergencyResponse

应急响应","Seacohasestablishedandimplementedabasicemergencyresponseprogram.Securitypersonnelreceivedfirefightingtrainingfromthelocalfirefightingadministrativebureau,andfourworkersreceivedfirstaidtraining.Emergencyevacuationdrillsandchemicalspillclean-updrillswereconducted.However,thedrillplandidnotcomplywiththesiteemergencyresponseplan,withinconsistencyonareassuchasrolesandresponsibilitiesandemergencyorganizations.Emergencyreportingprocedureandemergencycontactinformationwerenotincludedintheemergencyresponseplan.Theemergencycommanderwasnottrainedonhowtohandleanemergencycase.Thereweresomefirefightingfacilitiessuchasfireextinguishers,firehydrantinplaceandhavebeenregularlyinspected.However,firstaidkitsandeyewashersinthesitewerenotwellmaintainedandinspected.Eyewasherswerenotavailableatsomelocationswherechemicalswerehandled.东莞海宏科技有限公司制订了《应急响应程序》，但该程序中没有明确该公司的应急组织架构以及各个应急职能部门的职责，程序中没有包括应急电话清单。该公司的保安队伍参加了当地消防部门组织的培训，并被委派未该公司的义务消防员，另外有四名员工参加了急救员培训。该公司进行了紧急疏散演习以及仓库化学品泄漏演习，演习记录可查，但演习方案与应急响应程序中描述的内容不一致。担任应急总指挥角色的人员没有接收过该方面的培训。该公司配备的消防设施例如灭火器、消防栓都有定期的检查和维护，但现场的急救药箱和洗眼器缺乏日常维护。存在工作现场操作化学品的区域无洗眼器的情况。

",,,

,,,,,,,

,,,,,,,

,,,,,,,

,,,,,,,

,,,,,,,

,,,,,,,

,,,,,,,

,,,,,,,

,,,,,,,

,,,,,,,

,,,,,,,

,,,,,,,

,,,,,,,

,,,,,,,

,,,,,,,

,,,,,,,

,,,,,,,

,,,,,,,

,,,,,,,

,,,,,,,

,,,,,,,

,,,,,,,

,,,,,,,

,,,,,,,

,,,,,,,

,,,,,,,

,,,,,,,

,,,,,,,

,,,,,,,

,,,,,,,

,,,,,,,

,,,,,,,

,,,,,,,

,,,,,,,

,,,,,,,

,,,,,,,

,,,,,,,

,,,,,,,

,,,,,,,

,,,,,,,

,,,,,,,

,,,,,,,

,,,,,,,

,,,,,,,

,,,,,,,

,,,,,,,

,,,,,,,

,,,,,,,

,,,,,,,

,,,,,,,

,,,,,,,

,,,,,,,

,,,,,,,

,,,,,,,

,,,,,,,

,,,,,,,

,,,,,,,

,,,,,,,

,,,,,,,

,,,,,,,

,,,,,,,

,,,,,,,

,,,,,,,

,,,,,,,

,,,,,,,

,,,,,,,

,,,,,,,

,,,,,,,

,,,,,,,

,,,,,,,

,,,,,,,

,,,,,,,

,,,,,,,

,,,,,,,

,,,,,