




版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领
文档简介
WORKINGPAPERN°IDB-WP-1580
TaxationWhenMarketsAreNotCompetitive:
EvidencefromaLoanTax
FelipeBrugués
RebeccaDeSimone
Inter-AmericanDevelopmentBank
DepartmentofResearchandChiefEconomist
February2024
Taxation
tiv
WhM
Evid
frona_oaraX
FelipeBrugués*
RebeccaDeSimone**
*InstitutoTecnológicoAutónomodeMéxico
**LondonBusinessSchool
Inter-AmericanDevelopmentBank
DepartmentofResearchandChiefEconomist
February2024
Cataloging-in-Publicationdataprovidedbythe
Inter-AmericanDevelopmentBank
FelipeHerreraLibrary
Brugués,Felipe.
Taxationwhenmarketsarenotcompetitive:evidencefromaloantax/FelipeBrugués,RebeccaDeSimone.
p.cm.一(WorkingPaperSeries;1580)
Includesbibliographicalreferences.
1.Bankloans-Taxation-Ecuador.2.Competition-Ecuador.3.Governmentaidtohospitals-Ecuador.4.
Hospitals-Finance.I.DeSimone,Rebecca.Il.Inter-AmericanDevelopmentBank.Departmentof
ResearchandChiefEconomist.IIl.Title.IV.Series.
IDB-WP-1580
Copyright@2024Inter-AmericanDevelopmentBank("IDB").ThisworkissubjecttoaCreative
CommonslicenseCCBY3.0IGO(https///licenses/by/3.0/igo/legalcode).The
termsandconditionsindicatedintheURLlinkmustbemetandtherespectiverecognitionmustbegrantedtotheIDB
Furthertosection8oftheabovelicense,anymediationrelatingtodisputesarisingundersuchlicenseshallbeconductedinaccordancewiththeWIPOMediationRules.AnydisputerelatedtotheuseoftheworksoftheIDBthatcannotbesettledamicablyshallbesubmittedtoarbitrationpursuanttotheUnitedNationsCommissiononInternationalTradeLaw(UNCITRAL)rules.TheuseoftheIDB'snameforanypurposeotherthanforattribution,andtheuseofIDB'slogoshallbesubjecttoaseparate
writtenlicenseagreementbetweentheIDBandtheuserandisnotauthorizedaspartofthislicense.
NotethattheURLlinkincludestermsandconditionsthatareanintegralpartofthislicense.
TheopinionsexpressedinthisworkarethoseoftheauthorsanddonotnecessarilyreflecttheviewsoftheInter-AmericanDevelopmentBank,itsBoardofDirectors,orthecountriestheyrepresent.
Abstract
Westudytheinteractionofmarketstructureandtax-and-subsidystrategiesutilizingpass-throughestimatesfromtheunexpectedintroductionofaloantaxinEcuador,aquantitativemodel,andacomprehensivecommercial-loandataset.Ourmodelgeneralizesbankcompeti-tiontheories,includingBertrand-Nashcompetition,creditrationing,andjoint-maximization.Whilewefindtheloantaxisdistortionary,neglectingthepossibilityofnon-competitivelendinginflatesestimatedtaxdeadweightlossby80%becausenon-competitivebanksinternalizesomeoftheburden.Conversely,subsidiesarelesseffectiveinnon-competitivesettings.Ifcompeti-tionwerestronger,taxrevenuewouldbe10%lower.Thefindingssuggestthatpolicymakersshouldconsidermarketstructureintax-and-subsidystrategies.
JELclassifications:G21,G28,H2,L1
Keywords:Banks;Governmentregulationofbanks;Taxationandsubsidies;Marketstructure,firmstrategy,andmarketperformance
Acknowledgements:TheauthorsaregratefultoJohnGallemore(discussant),ThomasGresik(discussant),DiegoJiménezHernández(discussant),PaulaBustos,JoaoCocco,CldudiaCustó-dio,FranciscoGomez,GautamGowrisankaran,NicolaPavanini,TarunRamadorai,ClaudiaRobles-Garcia,BernardSalanié,AntoinetteSchoar,PietroTebaldi,ConstantineYannelisandseminarandconferenceaudiencemembersforhelpfulcomments.Wearegratefulforfinan-cialsupportfromSmallResearchGrant491fromtheStructuralTransformationandEconomicGrowthResearchProgramme;grantRG-K1198fromtheInter-AmericanDevelopmentBankresearchstreamon“CompetitioninLatinAmericaandtheCaribbean;”andtheLBSResearchandMaterialsDevelopmentFund.TheopinionsexpressedinthispublicationarethoseoftheauthorsanddonotnecessarilyreflecttheviewsoftheInter-AmericanDevelopmentBank,its
BoardofDirectors,orthecountriestheyrepresent.Copyright@2023.Inter-AmericanDevel-
opmentBank.Usedbypermission.
1
Policymakersoftentargettaxesandsubsidiesonthebankingsectorbecauseofitsessentialroleinaggregatingwealthandallocatingitacrosstherealeconomy.!Thesepoliciesarefrequentlydebatedinthepopularforumandamongseveralacademicliteratures,yettheconsiderationthattaxandsubsidyeffectivenesscoulddependonthecompetitivestructureofthebankingsector(WeylandFabinger(2013);PlessandvanBenthem(2019))isfrequentlyignored.?Yetbankingisnotwelldescribedbythecompetitivebenchmarkoftheclassicalparadigminpublicfinance(Slemrod(1990);Auerbach(2002)).3Inthispaper,wefillthisgapbyempiricallyinvestigatinghowbankcompetitiveconductmediatesthewelfareeffectsoffinancialtaxpolicy.
Wefocusonthesettingofanunanticipatedintroductionin2014ofaloantaxinEcuadortofundapubliccancerhospital(SociedaddeLuchaContraelCáncer,orSOLCA).EcuadordesignedtheSOLCAtaxasaone-timechargeof0.5%ofthevalueofcreditatthepointofloanapproval.4Crucially,thetaxwasunanticipatedandswiftlyenacted-itwasproposedinSeptemberandwasineffectbyOctober2014.Thus,theSOLCAtaxintroductionservesasi)arepresentativeexampleofacapitaltaxemployedworldwide,,andii)aquasi-exogenousshocktothemarginalcostoflending,uncorrelatedwithanyconcurrentchangesincreditdemand.
Weleveragecomprehensiveadministrativedatafrom2010to2017thatallowustomeasureloan-levelcontracttermsfornewcommercialcreditanddetailedfirm-levelinformationforcom-mercialborrowers,whichusebankcreditasaprimarysourceoffinancing.Werelyontheunex-pectedintroductionofthetaxtoobtainpass-throughestimatesusinganeventstudy.Onaverage,borrowersshoulderaround50%oftheloantaxandbanksabsorbtheremainderbyreducingloaninterestrates.Wedonotobserveanyanticipatorymovementininterestrates,whiletheincompletetaxpass-throughispersistentthrougheightquartersafterthetaxwasimplemented.Moreover,wecomparewithinactivefirm-bankpairssothatitisunlikelythattheeffectsaredrivenbychangesinthecompositionofborrowerrisk.
ISee,forexample,ColliardandHoffmann(2017);Caietal.(2021);andDávilaandParlatore(2021).
2Thereisrecentreduced-formevidencethattaxpass-throughsvarybymarketconcentrationinlendingmarkets(ScharfsteinandSunderam(2016);Drechsleretal.(2017);BenettonandFantino(2021)).Yetthestandardassumptioninthestructurallendingliteratureremainsthatlendersdonotconsidertheircompetitors'profitswhenpricingloans(Eganetal.(2017);Crawfordetal.(2018);Robles-Garcia(2021);Benettonetal.(2021);CuestaandSepúlveda(2021);Coxetal.(2023);YannelisandZhang(2023)).
3EmpiricalevidenceofcompetitioninbankinganditseffectsincludesCilibertoandWilliams(2014);Cornaggiaetal.(2015);HatfieldandWallen(2023);BruguésandDeSimone(2023);andJiangetal.(2023).
4Thetaxwas0.5%forcreditwithmaturitygreaterthanoneyearand0.5%*(maturityinmonths/12)forcreditwithmaturitybelowoneyearduringoursampleperiod.SeeSection1fordetails.
5TheCentreforEconomicPolicyResearchestimatesthatmorethan40countriesusedafinancialtransactiontaxin2020(
/report/financial-transactions-taxes-around-the-world/
,accessedAugust8,2023).Suchtaxesarefrequentlyproposed,includingintheInclusiveProsperityActproposedbySenatorBemieSandersin2019andCOM/2013/71proposedbytheEuropeanCommissionin2013,whichisstillonthetableasof2023.
6DatafromtheWorldBankEnterpriseSurvey2017reveals60%ofEcuadorianfirmshavebankcredit,comparabletotheLatinAmericanaverage(53%offirms).OtherprominentsourcesoffinancinginEcuadorincludeintermalfinancing(covering54%ofinvestments)andsuppliertradecredit(usedby64%offirms).
2
Theliteraturehasarguedthatpersistentincompletepass-throughisprimafacaeevidenceofimperfectcompetition(e.g.,ScharfsteinandSunderam,2016;Drechsleretal.,2017;BenettonandFantino,2021;Eisenschmidtetal,2023).Theintuitionisthat,iflenderspricedpurelybasedonlending'smarginalcost,theycouldnotprofitablydecreaseinterestratesinthelong-terminre-sponsetothenewtax.However,reduced-formevidencealoneisnotsufficienttofullycharacterizewelfare,sincethesameobservedpass-throughisconsistentwithdifferentmarketstructuresiftheanalysisdoesnotholdotherdemandandsupplyparametersconstant(WeylandFabinger,2013).Ourapproachrelaxestheneedtomakeanaprioriassumptiononthecompetitiveconductinthemarketandinsteadallowsustoestimateconductfromthedata.Specifically,weintroduceafreeconductparameterintoaflexiblediscrete-continuousstructuralmodelofcommerciallendingthatcapturestheequilibriumcompetitivebehaviorofbanksinthesamemarket.Crucially,ourmodelallowsthecommoncompetitivestructuresintheliteratureasspecialcases,including,Bertrand-Nashcompetition(theliterature'sbenchmark),creditrationing(Cournot),andjointmaximization,anditcanbeestimatedusingtraditionalmethodologies(Train,1986).
Whileflexible,ourapproachintroducesanadditionaldifficulty.Namely,thecompetitivecon-ductparameterandsupply-sideparameterscannotbeseparatelyidentifiedusingpriceandquantitydataalone(Bresnahan,1982).Itisforthisreasonthattheliteraturecommonlyassumesacom-petitiveconductofzero,correspondingtoBertrand-Nashcompetition.Ourkeyinnovationistheinsightthatthepass-throughestimatesthemselvesserveasquasi-experimentalvariationinlendingmarkupsthataresufficienttoidentifythegeneralcompetitionparameter.Ourmodeltransparentlymapstheestimatedpass-throughrateanddemandparametersintoinferenceabouttheformofcompetition
Wefindthatlendersarenotcompeting.Theestimatedconductparameterisstatisticallyindis-tinguishablefromthatrepresentingaperfectlycollusivemodelinwhichlendersformagreements(perhapstacitly)aboutpricesandactasasingleprofit-maximizingmonopolistinthemarket.WecanruleoutthatbanksareBertrand-NashorCournot(creditrationing)competingwithatleast95%confidence.Wetesttherobustnessoftheresultsbytransparentlyvalidatingtheidentificationconditionsrelatingpass-throughtoconduct.Furthermore,toreduceconcernsthatconductmighthavebeenaffectedfromtheintroductionofthetax,weshowestimatesarerelativelyunaffectedifwerelyonlyonperiodsbeforethetaxisintroduced.
Whymightbankscollude?Theeasyansweristhat,asinothersectors,bankspreferhighermarkups.Butspecifictobanking,policymakersoftenfavormarketconcentrationinlendingtoreducefragilityinthebankingsystem.?Wealsoprovideevidencesupportingcollusioninour
7This"competition-fragility"hypothesisproposesthatcompetitionreducesbankprofitmarginsandchartervalues,encouragingbankstoincreaserisk(Keeley,1990;Hellmannetal.,2000;Becketal.,2013;CorbaeandD'Erasmo,2019;Jiangetal.,2023),thoughthishypothesisiscontested(PetersenandRajan,1995;Bergeretal.,1998;BoydandDeNicolo,2005;Martinez-MieraandRepullo,2010;Akinsetal.,2016),
3
setting.Marketswithlowercompetitionasmeasuredbystandardcompetitionproxiesalsohavelesscompletepass-throughandlesscompetitiveconductparameters.Moreover,banksthataremembersofabankingassociationthatanecdotallyhelpslenderscoordinateindeedhavelesscompetitivepass-throughandconduct.
Wethenuseourmodeltoquantifyhowimportantcompetitionincommerciallendingistothewelfareeffectsofthebanktax.Wefindthatnotaccountingforlendercollusionwouldvastlyoverstatethewelfarecostsoftaxes(and,conversely,thewelfaregainsfromsubsidies).Ifweas-sumeBertrand-Nashpricecompetitionwhensettinginterestrates,weestimatetheSOLCAtax'sdeadweightlosstobe92centsperdollar.Instead,whilethetaxisstilldistortive,weestimateasig-nificantlysmallerlossof41centsperdollarwhenallowingthemodeltodepartfromdifferentiatedBertrand-Nashpricecompetition,themostcommonconductintheliterature.Thus,thetaxwaslessdistortivethanoriginallybelievedwithoutaccountingforlenderequilibriumcompetition.Wefindthatthisisbecausetheincidenceofthetaxdependscriticallyonthecompetitivestructureofthemarket.Inparticular,borrowersbearamuchhigherburdenofthetaxunderBertrand-Nashcompe-titionandthedeadweightlossisgreaterperunitofrevenueraised.Incontrast,theincidencefallsprimarilyonbanksinthejointmaximizationenvironment,loweringthetax'sdistortionaryeffectonborrowing.Hence,thepolicymaker'sevaluationoftheefficiencyandincidenceimplicationsofintroducingacapitaltaxisgreatlyaffectedbythemarketstructureassumption.8AsinMiraveteetal.(2018),wefindthatrevenue-maximizingtaxratesarehigherunderlesscompetitiveconduct,showingthattheLaffercurveshiftsrightwardunderreducedcompetition.Moreover,weestimate
thattaxrevenuewouldbeapproximately10%loweriflendersBertrand-Nashcompete.
Whileourstudyfocusesonthe2014SOLCAtaxinEcuador,itsimplicationsextendbeyondthisspecificcontextduetotheglobalprevalenceofuncompetitivebankingsectorsandthewidespreaduseofcapitaltaxes.°Moreover,atthemostbasiceconomiclevel,theSOLCAtaxisaquasi-exogenousshocktolendingmarkupsinoursetting.Thus,ourmethodologyreadilyappliestoothermarginalcostshocks(shockstomarkupskeepingdemandconstant),suchasstudyingtheeffectofinterestratepass-throughwhenlendingmarketsarenotcompetitive.10Conversely,wefindthata
8Letussayexplicitlythatpolicymakerswouldconsidermanyfactors,includingtherelativecost-benefitofcollu-sioninlendingmarketsitself.Inrelatedwork(BruguésandDeSimone,2023),weuseourmodeltoquantifyintensiveandextensivemarginimpactsofpricingpowerfromcollusionaboveandbeyonddemand-sidesourcesofmarketpower;provideadecompositionofmarkupsintoaportionfromlenderconduct,borrowerpreferences,andborrowerrisk;andexaminetheimpactofproposedcompetitionreformsinthebankingsector.Thisdoesnotnegatethefactthattheimpactofthetaxitselfdependsonlendercompetitionholdingconductconstant.
9WeprovideevidencethattheEcuadoriancommercialloanmarketisrepresentativeinSection1andinAppendixAppendixH,wherewereportcorrelationsbetweenaverageequilibriuminterestratesandmarketcharacteristicsattheaggregatedbank-province-yearlevel.Wealsocompareourestimatestothoseinthepublicfinanceandbankingliteraturesthroughout
10Asubstantialliteraturedocumentsthepass-throughofmonetarypolicytointerestrates(ScharfsteinandSun-deram,2016;DiMaggioetal.,2017;Drechsleretal.,2017;BenettonandFantino,2021;Wangetal.,2022;Eisen-schmidtetal.,2023;Lietal,2023).Ourresultscanextrapolatetothisquestiontotheextentinterestratechangesact
4
loansubsidythatreducedthemarginalcostoflendingwouldbeexpansionary,reducingdeadweightloss.However,thebenefits(incidence)wouldaccruemostlytolenders.
Animportantimplicationofourmodelestimatesisthatinoursettingwefindthat,aslongasonereliesonempiricalpass-throughstocapturecompetitionbehavioramongbanks,estimatesbothforincidenceandexcessburdenareconsistentacrossthevariousconductassumptions.!1Thisisbecauseconsumersurplusandgovernmentmarginalrevenuedependmostlyonpass-throughrates,whileproducersurplusdependsonpass-throughaswellasdemandelasticities.Inoursetting,therelevantcross-elasticitiesaremuchsmallerthanownelasticityandthustheinfluenceofconductonfinalproducersurplusisrelativelysmall.Thisimpliesthat,fromapolicyperspective,itmaybefeasibletoobtainrobustpredictionsaboutthewelfareeffectofproposedfinancialtaxeswithouttheneedtomodelandtestconductbeforehandinmarketswithsimilardemandfeatures.!2Thisinsightenhancesthepracticalusefulnessofourfindingsoutsideofourspecificsetting.
Ourstudyadvancestheliteratureinseveralways.First,weofferoneofthefirstempiricalpiecesofevidenceofhowmarketstructuremediatestheeffectsoftaxes,andthefirstintheeconomicallyimportantcommerciallendingsector.Ourstudybuildsuponanextensiveliteraturefocusingonthewelfareanddistributionaleffectsofthepass-throughoftaxes(andregulatorycostsequivalenttotaxes)inproductmarkets(NakamuraandZerom,2010;FabraandReguant,2014;Ganapatietal.,2020),aswellasthetheoreticalliteraturelinkingsucheffectstocompetitiveenvironments(WeylandFabinger,2013).However,thedistributionaleffectsoftaxesinlendingmarketsandhowthisdependsonthemarketstructureofthebankingindustryarelessstudied.Reduced-formevidencefromhigh-incomecountriessupportsthatpass-throughsvarybymarketconcentration(ScharfsteinandSunderam,2016;Drechsleretal.,2017;BenettonandFantino,2021).Whilesuggestive,thesedonotilluminatethesourceofbankpricingpower.Ourpaperadoptsadistinctpublicfinancelens,investigatinghowbankconcentrationmediatesthewelfareeffectsoffinancialtaxpolicy.
Specifically,weunderscorethesignificanceofcompetition,estimatingitsdirecteffectsonlend-ingmarketsbyleveragingtheSOLCAtaxintroductioninEcuador.Ourmethodology,reminiscentofAtkinandDonaldson(2015)ininternationaltradeandBergquistandDinerstein(2020)inlocalagriculturalmarkets,offersanovelapproachunderrepresentedinthelendingliterature.Thereareafewrelatedpapersoutsidethelendingcontext.Ganapatietal.(2020)studythewelfareeffectsofenergyinputcostsforUSmanufacturersaccountingforimperfectcompetition.Likeus,theyfindthattheincidenceofcostshocksonconsumersislowerundercollusionthanwhenfirmscompete.
throughsimilarcost-shiftermechanismsasatax.TheadvantageofusingtheSOLCAtaxasasettingtoestimatethemagnitudeoftheimpactratherthaninterestratechangesisthatthetaxisacleanershock.Forexample,itismorecrediblethatthetaxdidnotimpactwelfarebothdirectlyandthroughlargefeedbackeffects,suchaschangingtheinvestmentopportunityset.Thisislesscredibleintheinterestratesetting.
IIExactwelfaremagnitudescannotbepinneddownwithoutamodelthatincorporatesflexibleconduct.
l²Thisisnotobviousas,keepingpass-throughconstant,incidenceandexcessburdengenerallychangewithconduct(WeylandFabinger,2013).
5
Miraveteetal.(2018)studythetradeoffbetweentaxratesandrevenuewhenmarketsarenotcom-petitiveusingthesettingofretailsalesofalcoholinPennsylvania.Asinourstudy,theyfindthatthegovernment'srevenuegainissignificantlylowerthanexpectedunderstandarddifferentiatedpricecompetition.Moreover,weprovidesimilarevidencethattheLaffercurvefortheoptimalrevenue-maximizingtaxratemovestotherightinlesscompetitiveconduct.OurstudyalsodemonstrateshowmarketcompetitionaffectstheincidenceandeffectivenessoftheSOLCAtaxasacasestudyapplicablemoregenerallytoawiderangeofcapitaltaxesandfees.
Morebroadly,whileourwelfareanalysisfollowsthepublicpolicyliteratureinfocusingonthemarginalexcessburdenoftheSOLCAtax(Auerbach,1985,2002),ourfindingthatthewelfareeffectsoftaxesandsubsidiesvarywiththecompetitivenessoftheindustryappliesmorewidely.Theliteraturepresentsvariousframeworkstoestimatetheshadowpriceofraisingrevenuefromdifferentgroupstohelppolicymakerschooseamongamenuoffeasibletrade-offs.13Ourresultssuggestthatregardlessofthewelfareframeworkemployed,policymakersshouldincorporatemar-ketstructuretocorrectlydefinethetrade-off.
Second,wecontributeamethodologicalinnovationbyusingthepass-throughoftheSOLCAtaxtoestimateafreebankconductparameterandquantifythedegreetowhichbankscolludeandwhatmarketfeaturesfacilitatecollusion.Thisstrategyallowsustoempiricallytestthecompetitionmodeloflendingdirectly.Asubstantialportionofthecreditliterature—Crawfordetal.(2018)and(Coxetal.,2023)incommerciallendingbutalsoindeposits(Eganetal.,2017),mortgages(Robles-Garcia(2021);(Benetton,2021),autolending(YannelisandZhang(2023)),andconsumerlending(CuestaandSepúlveda,2021)—focusesonBertrand-Nashmodelsandtheroleoflendingmarketfrictionsinexplainingobservedprices.4Weprovideafreshperspectivebygeneralizingbankconductsothatwecanestimatehowmarkupsreflectpricingpowerfromthedemand-sidefactorsemphasizedinthesepapersandhowmuchtheyreflectlendersoftenedcompetition.
Thisalsorelatestoamuchwiderindustrialorganizationliteraturethatmodelsandestimatesfirmconduct,followingthepioneeringworkofBresnahan(1982).Notablerecentexamples(Nevo,2001;MillerandWeinberg,2017;Backusetal,2021;Calder-WangandKim,2023)followhisleadinusingexclusionrestrictionsfromplausiblyexogenousshifters,orviadirectmeasures,ofmarkupstotestalternativeconductmodels.
Thisliteraturefocusesonproductcharacteristicsordemanddemographicsinstrumentsthatshift
I³E.g,usingtherelatedwelfareconceptsoftheMarginalValueofPublicFunds(Mayshar,1990;HendrenandSprung-Keyser,2020))andtheMarginalCostofFunds(StiglitzandDasgupta,1971;AtkinsonandStern,1974;KlevenandKreiner,2006).
4HatfieldandWallen(2023)considertheimpactofbankcollusioninthedepositmarketthroughmulti-marketcon-tactbutdonottakeamodelingapproachthatallowsquantificationofotherwiseunobservablebankconduct.CilibertoandWilliams(2014)alsoconsiderstheeffectofcollusionthroughmulti-marketcontactintheairlineindustrybutdonotallowforafullyflexibleconductparameter.Ourapproachallowsustoflexiblyconsidermultipletraditionalmodelsofbankcompetitionandestimatetheconductparameterwithouttakinganexantestandonthemodeofconductinthedata
6
demandwithoutaffectingmarginalcosts(BerryandHaile(2014);Duarteetal.(2021);Backusetal.(2021)).15However,inmarketswithadverseselectionandotherpair-specificfrictionssuchinstrumentsalsocorrelatewithmarginalcosts,violatingtheexclusionrestriction.16Instead,weuseataxasanexogenousshifterandproposethetargetingofpass-throughsasamomenttoestimatelenderconduct.!7Ourmethodologythusextendstheclassicindustry-widepapersfromSumner(1981)andSullivan(1985)andisinthespiritofAtkinandDonaldson(2015),whouseobservablepass-throughtodeterminethedivisionofsurplusbetweenconsumersandintermediariesstemmingfrominternationaltrade,andofBergquistandDinerstein(2020),whouseexperimentallyestimatedpass-throughsinagriculturalmarketstotestforcollusionofintermediaries.Toourknowledge,thisapproachisnovelinthelendingliteratureandoffersarobustsolutionformarketswithadverseselectioninwhichdemand-shifterscorrelatewithmarginalcosts.
Lastly,ourpaperrelatestoafast-growingfinancialliteratureonpass-throughofmonetarypol-icy(ScharfsteinandSunderam,2016;DiMaggioetal.,2017;Drechsleretal.,2017;BenettonandFantino,2021;Wangetal.,2022;Eisenschmidtetal.,2023;Lietal.,2023).Ourpaperimpliesthatbankcompetitiveconductisakeydriveroftheincidenceandwelfareoffinancialinstruments.InthespecificcaseofEcuador,ourpaperimpliesexpansionarymonetarypolicythatservesasasubsidytolendingwouldhaveamoredilutedeffectthanotherwisethought,andbankswouldappropriateasignificantchunkofthosesubsidies.
Therestofthepaperisorganizedasfollows.Section1describestheSOLCAtax,theEcuado-riancreditmarket,andourdatasources.Section2presentsourbaselinemodelofcommerciallending,withSection2.1describinghowweidentifytheconductparameterusingpass-throughfromtheSOLCAtax.Section3presentstheempiricalpass-throughestimates.Section4describeshowweestimatethedemandmodelandpresentestimatesandmodelfit.Section5presentsthees-timationstrategyandestimatesforthesupplymodel.Section6offersmodelvalidationexercises,andcounterfactualsimulations,whileSection7presentswelfareanalysisoftheSOLCAtaxandhowitdependsonlendercompetitiveconduct.Section8concludes.
1DescriptionofSOLCATaxandDataset
1.1LoanTax
Likemanydevelopingcountries,particularlyinLatinAmerica,Ecuadoremploysbankleviesasa
revenuesource(KirilenkoandSummers,2003).Startingin1964,Ecuadorutilizedabanklevyto
ISE.gthelocalshareofchildrenaffectscerealdemandbutisunlikelytoaffectthemarginalcostsofproduction.16E.g,firmgrowthrates,assets,andtheageoftheCEOcorrelatewithborrower-specificmarginalcostchanges.
I⁷Rojas(2008)alsousepass-throughfromalargeincreaseinexcisetaxonbeertocomparepricestothoseimpliedbyvariouspricingmodels,thoughhedoesnotestimateconductdirectly.
7
raisefundstofundcancertreatment(SociedaddeLuchacontraelCancerorSOLCAtax).Thistaxappliedtoallfinancialoperationsatratesbetween0.25to1percentofthevalueofthetransactionorloan.In2008,theEcuadoriangovemmenteliminatedalltaxesonfinancialtransactions,includingtheSOLCAtax,optinginsteadtofundcancertreatmentandresearchthroughtheregularbudget.
Then,inSeptember2014,theEcuadorianNationalAssemblyratifiedanewlawcalledthe“CodigoOrgánicoMonetarioyFinanciero”thatstandardizedbanking,finance,andinsurancereg-ulations.Alast-minuteamendmentreintroducedtheSOLCAtaxtoaddressfundinggapsforcan-certreatment.18ThisreintroductionwasunexpectedbybothborrowersandfinancialinstitutionsinEcuador.19Thegovernmentimplement
温馨提示
- 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
- 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
- 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
- 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
- 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
- 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。
最新文档
- 国际商务礼仪与文化交流练习题
- 音乐欣赏考试试题及答案
- 异地主播考试试题及答案
- 六一儿童节冬泳活动方案
- 六一各班活动方案
- 六一基地活动方案
- 六一慰问活动方案
- 六一教师聚会活动方案
- 六一活动大扫除活动方案
- 六一活动联谊活动方案
- 2025年重庆市中考数学试卷真题(含标准答案)
- 农机耕地合同协议书范本
- 精装分包劳务合同协议书
- T/CNESA 1203-2021压缩空气储能系统性能测试规范
- T/CGMA 031003-2020一般用离心空气压缩机
- 2025年四年级下册美术期末测试题附答案
- 店面借给别人合同协议书
- 图像编辑基础Photoshop试题及答案
- 计量经济学知到智慧树期末考试答案题库2025年南开大学
- 宣城汽车精密零部件项目商业计划书
- 2025至2030中国天文馆行业投资前景研究与销售战略研究报告
评论
0/150
提交评论