采购和供应决策概述_第1页
采购和供应决策概述_第2页
采购和供应决策概述_第3页
采购和供应决策概述_第4页
采购和供应决策概述_第5页
已阅读5页,还剩81页未读 继续免费阅读

下载本文档

版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领

文档简介

10-1采购和供给决策Chapter10CR(2024)PrenticeHall,Inc.协调商品与效劳在供给链上各个实体机构之间的流动是供给链管理的一个主要课题。人们需要考虑的问题往往包括,决定要运输产品的数量、何时运输、如何运输以及从哪里获得这些产品等。10-2产品方案三角形ProductinthePlanningTriangleCR(2024)PrenticeHall,Inc.PLANNINGORGANIZINGCONTROLLINGTransportStrategy•Transportfundamentals•TransportdecisionsCustomerservicegoals•Theproduct•Logisticsservice•Ord.proc.&info.sys.InventoryStrategy•Forecasting•Inventorydecisions•Purchasingandsupplyschedulingdecisions•Storagefundamentals•StoragedecisionsLocationStrategy•Locationdecisions•Thenetworkplanningprocess计划组织控制TransportStrategy•Transportfundamentals•TransportdecisionsCustomerservicegoals•Theproduct•Logisticsservice•Ord.proc.&info.sys.InventoryStrategy•Forecasting•Inventorydecisions•Purchasingandsupplyschedulingdecisions•Storagefundamentals•StoragedecisionsLocationStrategy•Locationdecisions•Thenetworkplanningprocess库存战略预测客户效劳目标采购和供给时间决策存储根底知识存储决策产品物流效劳订单管理和信息系统库存决策运输战略运输根底知识运输决策选址战略选址决策网络规划流程10-3CR(2024)PrenticeHall,Inc.PurchasinginInventoryStrategyPLANNINGORGANIZINGCONTROLLINGTransportStrategy•Transportfundamentals•TransportdecisionsCustomerservicegoals•Theproduct•Logisticsservice•Ord.proc.&info.sys.InventoryStrategy•Forecasting•Inventorydecisions•Purchasingandsupplyschedulingdecisions•Storagefundamentals•StoragedecisionsLocationStrategy•Locationdecisions•ThenetworkplanningprocessPLANNINGORGANIZINGCONTROLLINGTransportStrategy•Transportfundamentals•TransportdecisionsCustomerservicegoals•Theproduct•Logisticsservice•Ord.proc.&info.sys.InventoryStrategy•Forecasting•Inventorydecisions•Purchasingandsupply

schedulingdecisions•Storagefundamentals•StoragedecisionsLocationStrategy•Locationdecisions•ThenetworkplanningprocessCR(2024)PrenticeHall,Inc.10.1供给渠道中的协调10-3供给渠道中,运作、营销、采购和所有其他活动之间的充分协调是及其重要的。这些经营活动之间的相互关联常常使得针对单独一项活动进行优化的努力可能对其他的一项或几项活动造成损害。无视这种悖反现象就会对公司运作带来负面影响。CR(2024)PrenticeHall,Inc.10.2供给方案10-3第一种方法是按照需要时间随时供给,不断调整供给时间使得物料的供给与生产的需求步调一致。其中,物料需求方案即处理方案安排的一种常用方法。第二种方法是持有库存来满足生产需求,利用补货规那么来维持库存水平,这些规那么决定了物料在供给渠道中流动的具体时间与数量。CR(2024)PrenticeHall,Inc.典型的调度图预测订单建立进度库存短缺发布采购订单对供给商产品发布材料账单Thepoint:Supplyistoinventoryortorequirements10-3CR(2024)PrenticeHall,Inc.ATypicalSchedulingDiagramForecastOrdersBuildscheduleInventoryShortagesPurchaseorderreleasesTovendorsProductionreleaseBillofmaterialsThepoint:Supplyistoinventoryortorequirements10-310-8CR(2024)PrenticeHall,Inc.SupplytoRequirements调度方法适时供给方案看板KANBAN需求方案Just-in-time一种整个供给渠道对生产/客户需求同步反响的理念。10-9CR(2024)PrenticeHall,Inc.按需供给调度方法Just-in-timeconceptRequirementsplanningKANBANJust-in-timeAphilosophyofschedulingwheretheentiresupplychannelissynchronizedtorespond,inasshortatimeaspossible,totherequirementsofoperations.10-10CR(2024)PrenticeHall,Inc.10.2.1适时供给方案一种整个供给渠道对生产/客户需求同步反响的理念。适时供给方案的特点与少数供给商和运输承运人保持密切关系;信息在供给商与买方之间实现共享频繁进行小规模的生产、采购、运输,从而把库存降到最低水平消除整个供给渠道中所有可能出现的不确定性高质量的目标10-1110.2.2看板KANBAN定义:看板/适时管理系统利用库存控制中的再订货点方法来确定标准生产/采购量,系统的生产启动本钱相当低,提前期也很短。特点:与为利用规模经济而建立的进度方案相比较,这种经常重复主生产进度方案重点产品样式,及就产品样式A和B而言,能够实现规模经济、节约生产启动本钱的生产进度方案可能是:AAAAAABBBBBBAAAAAABBBBBB然而,看板的生产进度方案那么可能是ABABABABABABABABABABABABCR(2024)PrenticeHall,Inc.10-12CR(2024)PrenticeHall,Inc.看板特点由于提前期很短,其可预测性大大提高由于生产启动本钱和采购本钱保持在较低水平,所以订货量很小。使用的供货商数量不多,相应地,公司对供货商期望很高。制造商与供货商之间建立起高度协作关系,以保证获得满意的产品,满意的物流绩效水平经典的再订货点库存控制是用来确定再订货点数量和时机。CR(2024)PrenticeHall,Inc.KANBANvs.SupplytoInventoryFactorsKANBAN/JITSchedulingSupplytoInventoryInventoryAliability.Everyeffortmustbeexpendedtodoawaywithit.Anasset.Itprotectsagainstforecasterrors,machineproblems,latevendordeliveries.Moreinventoryis"safer."LotSizesSizeforimmediateneedsonly.Aminimumreplenishmentquantityisdesiredforbothmanufacturedandpurchasedgoods.Formulasareused.Optimumlotsizesfrequentlyrevisedbasedonthetradeoffbetweenthecostofinventoriesandthecostofsetup.10-23CR(2024)PrenticeHall,Inc.KANBANvs.SupplytoInventoryFactorsKANBAN/JITschedulingSupplytoInventorySetUpsMaketheminsignificant.Thisrequireseitherextremelyrapidchangeovertominimizetheimpactonoperations,ortheavailabilityofextramachinesalreadysetup.Fastchangeoverpermitssmalllotsizestobepractical,andallowsawidevarietyofpartstobemadefrequently.Lowpriority.Maximumoutputistheusualgoal.Rarelydoessimilarthoughtandeffortgointoachievingquickchangeover.QueuesEliminatethem.Whenproblemsoccur,identifythecausesandcorrectthem.Thecorrectionprocessisaidedwhenqueuesaresmall.Ifthequeuesaresmall,itsurfacestheneedtoidentifyandfixthecause.Necessaryinvestment.Queuespermitsucceedingoperationstocontinueintheeventofaproblemwiththefeedingoperation.Also,byprovidingaselectionofjobs,thefactorymanagementhasagreateropportunitytomatchupvaryingoperatorskillsandmachinecapabilities,combineset-upsandthuscontributetotheefficiencyoftheoperation.10-24CR(2024)PrenticeHall,Inc.KANBANvs.SupplytoInventoryFactorsKANBAN/JITSchedulingSupplytoInventoryVendorsCo-workers.They'repartoftheteam.Multipledeliveriesforallactiveitemsareexpecteddaily.Thevendortakescareoftheneedsofthecustomer,andthecustomertreatsthevendorasanextensionofhisfactory.Adversaries.Multiplesourcesaretherule,andit'stypicaltoplaythemagainsteachother.QualityZerodefects.Ifqualityisnot100%,productionisinjeopardy.Toleratesomescrap.Scrapistrackedandformulasaredevelopedforpredictingit.Equipmentmainten-anceConstantandeffective.Machinebreakdownsmustbeminimal.Asrequired.Butnotcriticalbecauseofqueuesavailable.LeadtimesKeepthemshort.Thissimplifiesthejobofmarketing,purchasing,andmanufacturingasitreducestheneedforexpediting.Thelongerthebetter.Mostforemenandpurchasingagentswantmoreleadtime,notless.10-25CR(2024)PrenticeHall,Inc.KANBANvs.SupplytoInventoryFactorsKANBAN/JITSchedulingSupplytoInventoryWorkersManagementbyconsensus.Changesarenotmadeuntilconsensusisreached,whetherornotabitofarmtwistingisinvolved.Thevitalingredientof"ownership"isachieved.Managementbyedict.Newsystemsareinstalledinspiteoftheworkers.Theconcentrationisonmeasurementstodeterminewhetherornotthey'redoingit.10-2610.2.3需求方案Requirementsplanning理论根底:如果知道最终产品的需求数量和需要时间,就不需要保有零配件、原材料和供给库存,就可以通过提前订购来消除对库存的需求,随时满足最终产品的生产需要。精确安排物料运送时间以满足生产需求正是实施物料需求方案的根本原那么。CR(2024)PrenticeHall,Inc.10-6SupplytoRequirements(Cont’d)TimeTimeOrderpointOrderpointLevelLevel00ProductionorderreleaseOrderplacement(a)Fieldinventory(Finishedproductinwarehouse)(b)Factoryinventory(Finishedproductatplant)WhydemandbecomeslumpyCR(2024)PrenticeHall,Inc.10-710-19CR(2024)PrenticeHall,Inc.SupplytoRequirements(Cont’d)TimeOrderpointLevel0Purchaseorderrelease(c)Componentinventory(Supplystocksatplant)10-20CR(2024)PrenticeHall,Inc.10.2.4物料需求方案的运作机制编制供给方案的一种标准的制度性方法,通过提前订货消除对供给库存的需求,协调采购时间或生产时间安排来满足阶段性运作要求。MRP也可以指阶段性补货方案10-21MRPSchedulingExampleThemasterscheduleforaparticularpartoverthenext8weeksshowsrequirementsof:123456781505003503001000800700500Theaveragelead-timetoreceivethesepartsfromavendoris2weeks.Apreviousorderfor800unitshasbeenplacedwiththevendorandwillarrivebyweek2.Aninventoryof200unitsiscurrentlyonhand.Lot-for-lotschedulingPurchaseordersarematchedonaone-for-onebasiswithrequirements.CR(2024)PrenticeHall,Inc.MRPExample(Cont’d)

Week12345678Require-ments1505003503001000800700500Scheduledreceipts8003001000800700500Quantityonhand20050350000000Purchasereleases3001000800700500Lot-for-lotscheduling(Cont’d)CR(2024)PrenticeHall,Inc.10-11CR(2024)PrenticeHall,Inc.MRPExample(Cont’d)PurchaseorderminimumsVendorscansetorderminimumquantitiestoavoidthehighcostofhandlingsmallorders.Thiswillusuallyforcesomeinventoryintothesystem.PartperiodcostbalancingTheeconomicallybestorderquantitiescanbesetbybalancingthecostofprocessinganorderwiththecostofcarryingtheinventoryassociatedwithorderingmorethanwhatisimmediatelyneeded.Supposeitcosts$120toprocessanddelivereachorder.Inventorycarryingcostsare25%peryear,or$0.07perunitperweekonpartsvaluedat$15.10-12Ordermin.qty.MRPExample(Cont’d)

Week12345678Require-ments1505003503001000800700500Scheduledreceipts800300800800700500Quantityonhand2005035002000000Purchasereleases500800800700500OrderminimumsSupposethevendorhasanorderminimumof500units.CR(2024)PrenticeHall,Inc.10-1310-25CR(2024)PrenticeHall,Inc.Part-PeriodExample(Cont’d)Anorderistobereleasedforaquantitytojustmeetrequirementsorforaquantitythatwillmeetseveralweeks’requirements.Findtheaverageinventorycostsforordering1week’srequirements,2weeks’requirements,etc.Theorderquantityistheonethatbestmatchestheorderprocessingcost.MethodFindtheaverageinventoryineachweek.Averageinventoryisbeginninginventory

endinginventory/2,wherebeginninginventoryisscheduledreceipts

quantityonhand.Endinginventoryisbeginninginventory–requirements.Therefore,CR(2024)PrenticeHall,Inc.Part-PeriodExample(Cont’d)SincethecarryingcostofQ=1,300bestmatchestheprocess/ordercostof$120,thenitisbesttoorder2weeksahead.After2weeks,computeforanewquantity.Closestto$120processcost10-15MRPExample(Cont’d)SafetystockUncertaintiesinthemasterscheduleandintheleadtimesaresometimeshandledbyrequiringaminimumquantityonhandtobemaintained.Supposeasafetystockof100unitsistobemaintainedwitha500-unitorder-sizeminimum.

Week12345678Require-ments1505003503001000800700500Scheduledreceipts800500900800700500Quantityonhand20050350500200100100100100Purchasereleases50090080070050010-1610-28CR(2024)PrenticeHall,Inc.MRPExample(Cont’d)Settingthelead-timeSupposethereisacostofdelayingproductionwhenthepartsdonotarriveontime.Acarryingcostof$5perunitperdayisincurred(costisdifferentfrompreviousillustrationforcontrast).Lead-timeaverages14days(2weeks)withastandarddeviationof3daysandisnormallydistributed.Whatistheproperlead-timetoreleaseorders?WearelookingforT*ontheleadtimedistribution.First,wefindtheprobabilityofdelayingproductionfrom10-29CR(2024)PrenticeHall,Inc.MRPExample(Cont’d)wherePc=costofhavingmaterialsaftertheyareneeded ($/unit/day)Cc=costofhavingmaterialsbeforetheyareneeded ($/unit/day)Fromanormaldistributiontable,thisisapointof2.33standarddeviationsfromtheaverageleadtime,orz=2.33.Then,10-30CR(2024)PrenticeHall,Inc.MRPExample(Cont’d)where

T*=orderreleasetime

LT=averagelead-time

sLT=standarddeviationoflead-time(days)

z=numberofstandarddeviationsbetweenLT andT*Hence,

T*

=14+2.33(3)=21daysLead-timeshouldbeconsidered3weeksinsteadof2weeks.Thiswillforcesomeinventoryintothesystem.10-31CR(2024)PrenticeHall,Inc.MRPExample(Cont’d)PLT=14sLT=3T*Leadtimedistributionwithorderreleasepoint供给链动力学牛鞭效应SupplyChainDynamics“BullwhipEffect〞TimeSupplychannelCustomerCustomerFirmAFirmBFirmCFirmCFirmADemandDemandonupstreamfirmsvariesgreatlywithsmallchangesindownstreamdemandCR(2024)PrenticeHall,Inc.10-27CR(2024)PrenticeHall,Inc.牛鞭效应ReasonsfortheeffectInternal需求转移Demandshifts产品/效劳变更Product/service changes迟延交货Latedeliveries不完全装运IncompleteshipmentsExternal供给短缺Supplyshortages工程变更Engineeringchanges新产品/效劳引入Newproduct/service introductions产品/效劳促销Product/servicepromotions信息错误Informationerrors补救措施RemediesCentralizedemandforecastingImproveforecastingaccuracyReducelead-timeuncertaintiesthroughoutthechannelSmoothresponsetochange10-28CR(2024)PrenticeHall,Inc.牛鞭效应补救措施Remedies集中需求预测Centralizedemandforecasting提高预测精度Improveforecastingaccuracy减少整个渠道的不确定性Reducelead-timeuncertaintiesthroughoutthechannel平滑变化的反响Smoothresponsetochange10-2810-35CR(2024)PrenticeHall,Inc.供给商管理库存供给商通常在客户位置处拥有库存供给商可以通过适当的任何方式管理库存并且能够方案运输规模和交付的经常性买方向供给商提供销售信息买方在商品交付时付款买方确定库存可得性水平10-36CR(2024)PrenticeHall,Inc.VendorManagedInventoryThesupplierusuallyownstheinventoryatthe customer’slocationThesuppliermanagestheinventorybyanymeans appropriateandplansshipmentsizesanddelivery frequencyThebuyerprovidespointofsaleinformationtothe supplierThebuyerpaysforthemerchandiseatthetimeofsaleThebuyerdictatesthelevelofstockavailability required10-3710.3采购Whatispurchasing?〔采购〕主要是购置行为Primarilyabuyingactivity整体物料管理和物流整合的决策领域Adecisionareatobeintegratedwithoverall materialsmanagementandlogistics有时,是企业战略优势领域Attimes,anareatobeusedtothefirm’sstrategic advantageMission确保在正确的时间、以正确的价格、正确的地点、正确的数量和质量通过生产、分销和效劳组织所需要的产品、原材料和效劳Securingtheproducts,rawmaterials,andservicesneededbyproduction,distribution,andserviceorganizationsattherighttime,therightprice,therightplace,therightquality,andintherightquantity.CR(2024)PrenticeHall,Inc.10-38采购相关的活动选择、考核供给商评定供给商的业绩洽谈合同比较价格、质量和效劳水平寻找产品与效劳的供给来源制定采购活动时间安排确定销售条件评价所购置的产品、效劳价值如果质量控制部门不负责检测购进物品的质量,那么由采购部门负责预测价格与效劳、有时还要预测需求的变动确定具体的收货方式10-39Purchasing(Cont’d)Whatispurchased?〔购置〕价格Price货物本钱Costofgoods销售条件Termsofsale折扣Discounts质量Quality符合标准Meetingspecifications符合质量标准Conformancetoqualitystandards效劳Service准时无损交货,完成订单准确率,产品可得性On-timeanddamage-freedelivery,order-filling accuracy,productavailability产品支持ProductsupportCR(2024)PrenticeHall,Inc.10.3.1采购的重要性Importanceofpurchasingmanagement占销售价值的40%-60%Decisionsimpacton40to60%ofsalesdollar决策是高度杠杆DecisionsarehighlyleveragedActivitiesofpurchasingSelectsandqualifies suppliersRatessupplierperformanceNegotiatescontractsComparesprice,quality,and serviceSourcesgoodsTimespurchasesSetstermsofsaleEvaluatesthevalue receivedMeasuresinboundqualityif notaresponsibilityof qualitycontrolPredictsprice,service,and sometimesdemand changesSpecifiesforminwhich goodsaretobereceivedCR(2024)PrenticeHall,Inc.10-32ImportanceofPurchasingLeverageprinciple

costs当前值Current销售额Sales+17%价格Price+5%劳务费和工资LaborandSalaries-50%一般管理费用Overhead-20%采购Purchases-8%Sales$100$117$105$100$100$100Purchasedgoodsandservices607060606055Laborandsalaries10121051010Overhead252525252525Profit$5$10$10$10$10$10Acompanywith$100millioninsaleswishestodoubleprofits.Howtodoit?Conclusion

ReducingpurchasepricesrequirestheleastchangeCR(2024)PrenticeHall,Inc.10-33ImportanceofPurchasingLeverageprinciple

returnonassetsSales$10millionTotalcosta$9.5millionProfit$500,000Sales$10millionDividedbyProfitmargin5%LessSales$10millionReturnonassets10%Investmentturnover2timesTotalassets$5millionDividedbyInventoryc$2millionMultipliedby(9.25million)b($750,000)(7.5%)(15.3%)(2.04)($4.9million)($1.9million)aPurchasesare50%oftotalsales.bFiguresinparenthesesassumea5%reductioninpurchaseprices.cInventoryis40%oftotalassets.A5%reductioninpurchasepricecanleadtoa15%increaseinreturnonassetsCR(2024)PrenticeHall,Inc.10-3410-43选择供给商SupplierSelection选择标准Criteriaforselectingsuppliers过去或者预期关系Pastoranticipatedrelations老实度Honesty财务可行性Financialviability互惠Reciprocity活动度量Measuredperformance价格Price对变化或要求的响应度Responsivenesstochangeorrequests准时交货On-timedelivery产品或者效劳备份Productorservicebackup符合质量目标MeetingqualitygoalsCR(2024)PrenticeHall,Inc.10-44SupplierSelection(Cont’d)SinglevendorsAllowsforeconomiesofscaleConsistentwiththejust-in-timephilosophyBuildsloyaltyandtrustMaybeonlysourceforuniqueproductorserviceMultiplevendorsEncouragespricecompetitionDiffusesriskMaydisturbsupplierrelations,reduceloyalty,reduce responsiveness,andcausevariationsinproduct qualityandserviceCR(2024)PrenticeHall,Inc.10-45SupplierSelection(Cont’d)Findingsuppliers私人交往Personalcontacts贸易出版物Tradepublications网站、目录Websites,catalogs,anddirectories广告推销Advertisementsandsolicitations合格供给商Qualifyingsuppliers以往经验和正式评价方案PreviousexperiencesandformalratingschemesWordofmouth样品Samplesofproduct声誉Reputation现场参观或者演示SitevisitsanddemonstrationsCR(2024)PrenticeHall,Inc.10-46SupplierSelection(Cont’d)Criteriaforselectingsuppliers(Cont’d)操作兼容性Operationalcompatibility信息兼容性Informationalcompatibility物理兼容性Physicalcompatibility伦理道德问题Ethicalandmoralissues少数供给商Minorityvendors最低价格招标Lowestpricebidding爱国采购Patrioticpurchasing公开招标但是有提前选择的供给商Openbiddingbutapre-selectedvendorCR(2024)PrenticeHall,Inc.CR(2024)PrenticeHall,Inc.供给商评价SupplierRatingExampleofweightedchecklistmethodforsupplierevaluationScoringactualperformanceComparetobestscoreof100andtoscoresforothersuppliers.WeightFactorFormula50%Quality100%-%rejects25%Service100%-7%foreachfailure25%PriceLowestpriceoffered

PriceactuallypaidFactorWeightPerformanceEvaluationQuality505%rejects50x(1-.05)=47.50Service253failures25x[1-(.07x3)]=19.75Price25$10025x($90/$100)=22.50

Overall

89.7510-39AllocationtoSuppliersAllocationmethodsCompanypolicyconsideringrisk,fairness,ethics,etc.DefinitivemethodsExampleofadefinitivemethodTheAcmeCompanyhasreceivedquotesforacomponent(X-16)thatispartofalargerassembly(industrialmotors).Thepricesareasfollows:SupplierShippinglocationFOBpricePhiladelphiaToolPhiladelphia$100eaHoustonTool&DieHouston101Chicago-ArgoStLouis99LAToolWorksLosAngeles96CR(2024)PrenticeHall,Inc.10-40CR(2024)PrenticeHall,Inc.Allocation(Cont’d)Thecompanyhas3plantstobesuppliedatCleveland,Atlanta,KansasCity.Thetransportationrates,plantrequirements(cwt.),andavailablesupplylimits(cwt.)are:ShippingKansasAvail-pointClevelandAtlantaCityabilityPhiladelphia

2

3

5

5,000Houston

6

4

315,000StLouis

3

3

1

4,000LosAngeles

8

9

715,000Requirements4,0002,0007,000Eachpartweighs100lb.(1cwt.)andratesarein$/cwt.10-41CR(2024)PrenticeHall,Inc.Allocation(Cont’d)Purchasecosts13,000x96=$1,248,000TransporttoCLE4,000x8=32,000TransporttoATL2,000x9=18,000TransporttoKC7,000x7=49,000Total$1,347,000Currentpurchase:Buyfromsupplierwithlowestprice.Thus,allpurchasesfromLAToolforatotalcostof:Isbuyingbasedonlowestpriceagoodstrategy?10-42Allocation(Cont’d)AllocateusinglinearprogrammingPurchasepriceplustransportShippingAvail-point

CLE

ATL

KCDummyabilityPhila-1021031050delphia4,0001,000

5,000Houston107105104015,00015,000Saint1021021000Louis4,000

4,000

Los1041051030Angeles1,0003,00011,00015,000Require-ments4,0002,0007,00026,000CR(2024)PrenticeHall,Inc.10-43Allocation(Cont’d)RevisedplanPHItoCLE102x4000=$408,000PHItoATL103x1000=103,000STLtoKC100x4000=400,000LAXtoATL103x1000=103,000LAXtoKC103x3000=309,000Total$1,325,000Thisallocationsaves$22,000perpurchaseNow,asking“whatif〞questionscanprovideinsightintogoodallocationplans.CR(2024)PrenticeHall,Inc.10-44CR(2024)PrenticeHall,Inc.Allocation(Cont’d)WhatifCLEandKCmarketsareincreasedby20%andATLmarketisincreasedby50%.

CLEATLKCPHI4800

200HOUSTL2800

1200LAX7200Totalcost=$1,657,400SolutionProblem10-45CR(2024)PrenticeHall,Inc.Allocation(Cont’d)WhatifPhiladelphiapriceisincreasedby10%?Solution

CLEATLKCPHIHOUSTL2000

2000LAX4000

5000Totalcost=$1,335,000Problem10-46CR(2024)PrenticeHall,Inc.Allocation(Cont’d)WhatifSTLisnolongerasupplier?SolutionHOUSTLLAX1000

7000

CLEATLKCPHI4000

1000Totalcost=$1,337,000Problem10-47CR(2024)PrenticeHall,Inc.Allocation(Cont’d)WhatifSTL’scapacityisdoubled?Solution

CLEATLKCPHI40001000HOUSTL10007000LAXTotalcost=$1,313,000ProblemObservations

Houstonisaweaksupplier.Perhapssomepriceconcessionscanbenegotiated?Philadelphiaispricesensitiveandcannotwithstandmuchofapriceincrease.StLouisisavaluablesupplierandmorecapacityshouldbesought.10-48通过JIT方案Throughjust-in-timeplanning连续工作的物料需求方案Materialrequirementsplanningforcontinuouswork工程工作的甘特图和CPM/PERT法GanttchartsandCPM/PERTforprojectwork通过库存管理Throughinventorymanagement推动式Pushmethods拉动式Pullmethods根据市场情况Accordingtomarketconditions投机购置Speculativebuying提前购置Forwardbuying临时购置Hand-to-mouthbuying,orbuyingtocurrent requirements10.3.2订货时间TimingofPurchasesMethods10-49TimingofPurchases(Cont’d)投机购置SpeculativebuyingBuyingmorethantheforeseeablerequirementsatcurrentpricesinthehopeofresellinglaterathigherprices.Someofthepurchasedquantitiesmaybeusedinproductionandsomesimplyresold.Generallyafinancialactivity,notamaterialsmanagementone.提前购置Forwardbuying购置数量超过需求但不超过可预计的需求量Buyinginquantitiesexceedingcurrentrequirements,butnotbeyondforeseeableneeds.-在不稳定市场利用有利价格或者利用运输规模优势Takesadvantageoffavorablepricesinanunstable market,ortakesadvantageofvolumetransportationrates-减少交付风险ReducesriskofinadequatedeliveryCR(2024)PrenticeHall,Inc.10-50TimingofPurchases(Cont’d)投机购置SpeculativebuyingBuyingmorethantheforeseeablerequirementsatcurrentpricesinthehopeofresellinglaterathigherprices.Someofthepurchasedquantitiesmaybeusedinproductionandsomesimplyresold.Generallyafinancialactivity,notamaterialsmanagementone.提前购置ForwardbuyingBuyinginquantitiesexceedingcurrentrequirements,butnotbeyondforeseeableneeds.

-Takesadvantageoffavorablepricesinanunstable market,ortakesadvantageofvolumetransportation rates

-ReducesriskofinadequatedeliveryCR(2024)PrenticeHall,Inc.10-50TimingofPurchases(Cont’d)Hand-to-mouthbuying通过MRP购置满足即时需要的通常物品BuyingtosatisfyimmediateneedssuchasthosegeneratedthroughMRP.-价格下降时有利Advantageouswhenpricesaredropping-可以通过临时减少存货的费用来改善现金流Mayimprovecashflowbytemporarilyreducing expensesofcarryinginventoryCR(2024)PrenticeHall,Inc.10-51混合采购战略采用混合采购战略,即既有按需购置,也有先期购置,比单纯使用按需购置得到的平均价格更低。先期购置是指购置的数量大于当前需求量,但不超过未来可预见的需求量。Objective

Tobuyinlargervolumewhenpricesarerisingandtobuyonlytoimmediateneedswhenpricesarefalling.CR(2024)PrenticeHall,Inc.10-52Note:Thereasontolookatforecastingmethods混合采购战略Forwardbuyingexample--volumebuyingAfirmisabletoforecastthefollowingpricecurveoverthenexttwoyearswithusageaveraging20,000unitspermonthObjective

Tobuyinlargervolumewhenpricesarerisingandtobuyonlytoimmediateneedswhenpricesarefalling.CR(2024)PrenticeHall,Inc.10-52TimingofPurchases(Cont’d)Strategy

Trypurchasingeveryfourmonthswhilepricesarerisingandhand-to-mouthpurchasingwhentheyarefalling.Priceupswingpurchasecost

NoofCostTotalDateunitsperunitcostJan80,000$2.00$160,000May80,0002.35188,000Sep

80,000

2.75

220,000_______________

240,000$568,000Averagecostperunit=568,000/240,000=$2.37perunitCR(2024)PrenticeHall,Inc.10-53

20,000

240,000$593,800TimingofPurchases(Cont’d)PricedownswingpurchasecostAveragecostperunit=593,000/240,000=$2.47perunit

NoofCostTotalDateunitsperunitcostJan20,000$2.86$57,200Feb20,0002.8356,600Mar20,0002.8056,000Apr20,0002.7555,000May20,0002.6553,000Jun20,0002.5551,000Jul20,0002.4549,000Aug20,0002.3547,000Sep20,0002.2545,000Oct20,0002.1543,000Nov20,0002.0541,000

2.00

40,000DecNote:Thisisthesameaveragepriceashand-to-mouthbuyingonpriceupswing.CR(2024)PrenticeHall,Inc.10-54CR(2024)PrenticeHall,Inc.TimingofPurchases(Cont’d)SavingsSavingsforoneyearoutoftwoare:or$593,800–568,000=$25,000ButtradeswithincreasedinventoryBuyingin80,000lotquantitiesinsteadof20,000willaddtoinventory.ThisistheincrementalinventoryneededforforwardbuyingcomparedwithH-to-M10-5510-66CR(2024)PrenticeHall,Inc.TimingofPurchases(Cont’d)Supposeinventorycarryingcostsare25%peryearonanapproximatevalueof$2.37perunit.Incrementalinventorycostswouldbe:CC=0.25(2.37)(30,000)=$17,775Netsavings=25,000–17,775=$7,225infavorofforwardbuying.Now,tryotherlengthsofforwardbuying,suchasonceayear,toseeiffurtherimprovementcanbemade.CR(2024)PrenticeHall,Inc.金额平均法该方法假定价格一般会随着时间的推移而增长。此外,它还假定价格会有不确定的上

温馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
  • 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
  • 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
  • 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
  • 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

评论

0/150

提交评论