写作巧借阅读打造满分小作文

托福小作文-

巧借阅读打造满分小作文

徐莹莹独家深入解析阅读部分，瞬间提高综合小作文听力笔记秘密全公开，如口译一样回答综合写作小作文的框架阅读听力写作常见误区1.小作文不用练习，上考场自然就会了2.小作文考得差，都怪我听力不好3.听力笔记就是写单词上去，单词记得越多越好4.写作就是把阅读和听力的都写上去在我罗里吧嗦前大家先练下手先练习TPO3小作文记阅读和听力笔记，不用写出来待会儿可以上传你们的笔记上来，后面老师会点评阅读听力的框架论点论据例证听力如何反驳阅读1.听力论点直接反驳阅读论点2.听力论据/例证来反驳阅读论据/例证

必须要关注阅读进一步展开的部分，

找准论据和例证如何围绕论点展开的。常被忽视的阅读部分阅读正确的打开方式：开头段开头段框架：背景句+论点句重点抓论点—全文讨论的话题阅读正确的打开方式：中间段1.抓第一句论点句2.进一步展开内容1）概括-具体2）过程的关键词/反复出现的单词3）例子：专有名词开扒TPO3阅读部分Rembrandtisthemostfamousoftheseventeenth-centuryDutchpainters.However,therearedoubtswhethersomepaintingsattributedtoRembrandtwereactuallypaintedbyhim.OnesuchpaintingisknownasPortraitofanElderlyWomaninaWhiteBonnet.ThepaintingwasattributedtoRembrandtbecauseofitsstyle,andindeedtherepresentationofthewoman’sfaceisverymuchlikethatofportraitsknowntobebyRembrandt.But

thereareproblemswiththepaintingthatsuggestitcouldnotbeaworkbyRembrandt.First,thereissomethinginconsistentaboutthewaythewomanintheportraitisdressed.

Sheiswearingawhitelinencapofakindthatonlyservantswouldwear-yetthecoatsheiswearinghasaluxuriousfurcollarthatnoservantcouldafford.Rembrandt,whowasknownforhisattentiontothedetailsofhissubjects’clothing,wouldnothavebeenguiltyofsuchaninconsistency.Theinconsistencybetweenthewoman’swhitelinencapandfurcoat;Rembrandtisverydetailoriented.Second,Rembrandtwasamasterofpaintinglightandshadow,butinthispaintingtheseelementsdonotfittogether.Thefaceappearstobeilluminatedbylightreflectedontoitfrombelow.But

belowthefaceisthedarkfurcollar,whichwouldabsorblightratherthanreflectit.Sothefaceshouldappearpartiallyinshadow-whichisnothowitappears.Rembrandtwouldneverhavemadesuchanerror.Finally,examinationofthebackofthepaintingrevealsthatitwaspaintedonapanelmadeofseveralpiecesofwoodgluedtogether.AlthoughRembrandtoftenpaintedonwoodpanels,nopaintingknowntobebyRembrandtusesapanelgluedtogetherinthiswayfromseveralpiecesofwood.听力部分Everythingyoujustreadabout"PortraitofanElderlyWomaninaWhiteBonnet"istrue,andyetafterathoroughre-examinationofthepainting,apanelofexpertshasrecentlyconcludedthatit'sindeedaworkbyRembrandt.Hereiswhy.

First,thefurcollar.X-raysandanalysisofthepigmentsinthepainthaveshownthatthefurcollarwasn'tpartoftheoriginalpainting.Thefurcollarwaspaintedoverthetopoftheoriginalpaintingaboutahundredyearsafterthepaintingwasmade.Why?Someoneprobablywantedtoincreasethevalueofthepaintingbymakingitlooklikeaformalportraitofanaristocraticlady.Second,thesupposederrorwithlightandshadow.Oncethepaintoftheaddedfurcollarwasremoved,theoriginalcouldbeseen.Intheoriginalpainting,thewomaniswearingasimplecollaroflight-coloredcloth.Thelight-coloredclothofthiscollarreflectslightthatilluminatespartofthewoman'sface.That'swhythefaceisnotinpartialshadow.Sointheoriginalpainting,lightandshadowareveryrealisticandjustwhatwewouldexpectfromRembrandt.Finally,thewoodpanel.Itturnsoutthatwhen

thefurcollarwasadded,thewoodpanelwasalsoenlargedwithextrawoodpiecesgluedtothesidesandthetoptomakethepaintingmoregrandandmorevaluable.Sotheoriginalpaintingisactuallypaintedonasinglepieceofwood,aswouldbeexpectedfromaRembrandtpainting.Andinfact,researchershavefoundthatthepieceofwoodintheoriginalformof"PortraitofanElderlyWomaninaWhiteBonnet"isfromtheverysametreeasthewoodpanelusedforanotherpaintingbyRembrandt,his"Self-portraitwithaHat".笔记demo满分范文Thelecturerevisestheideapresentedinthetext,thatRembrandtwasnottheartistwhopaintedthefamouspainting"PortraitofanElderlyWomaninaWhiteBonnet”.Theinconsistencybetweenthewhitecap,whichidentifiesthewomanasaservant,andtheexpensivefurcollarshewearsdissolvesastheProfessorexplainsthatthefurcollarwasapparentlypaintedovertheoriginalpaintingtoincreaseitsworthbydisplayinganaristocraticwoman.Inaddition,theassumptionthatlightandshadowinthepaintingdonotfittogetherisrefutedbythefactthatintheoriginalpainting,whenthedarkfurcollarwasremoved,thewomanworealight-colorcloththatilluminatedherface.Thusthepresentationoflightandshadowwasindeedveryrealisticandaccurate,asitischaracteristicofRembrandt’spaintings.Finally,themysteryofthepanelconsistingofpatchesgluedtogetherisalsosolvedinthelecture.Actually,thewoodpanelwaslaterenlargedtomakeitmoregrandandvaluable,buttheoriginalpaintingwaspaintedonasinglepanel,asRembrandtwouldhavedoneit.Furthermore,thewoodisofthesametreeusedinotherRembrandtpaintings,likethe"Self-PortraitwithaHat”.再来一篇TPO30的练习大家先做阅读和听力部分，可以把笔记发上来。TPO30Alittleover2,200yearsago,theRomannavyattackedtheGreekportcityofSyracuse.Accordingtosomeancienthistorians,theGreeksdefendedthemselveswithaningeniousweaponcalleda“burningmirror”:apolishedcoppersurfacecurvedtofocustheSun’sraysontoRomanships,causingthemtocatchfire.However,wehaveseveralreasonstosuspectthatthestoryoftheburningmirrorisjustamythandtheGreeksofSyracuseneverrallybuiltsuchadevice.

First,theancientGreekswerenottechnologicallyadvancedenoughtomakesuchadevice.Amirrorthatwouldfocussunlightwithsufficientintensitytosetshipsonfirewouldhavetobeseveralmeterswide.Moreover,themirrorwouldhavetohaveaverypreciseparaboliccurvature(acurvaturederivedfromageometricshapeknownastheparabola).Thetechnologyformanufacturingalargesheetofcopperwithsuchspecificationsdidnotexistintheancientworld.Second,theburningmirrorwouldhavetakenalongtimetosettheshipsonfire.Inanexperimentconductedtodeterminewhetheraburningmirrorwasfeasible,adeviceconcentratingtheSun’sraysonawoodenobject30metersawaytooktenminutestosettheobjectonfire;andduringthattime,theobjecthadtobeunmoving.ItisunlikelythatRomanshipsstayedperfectlystillforthatmuchtime,Suchaweaponwouldthereforehavebeenveryimpracticalandineffective.Third,aburningmirrordoesnotseemlikeanimprovementonaweaponthattheGreeksalreadyhad:flamingarrows.Shootingatanenemy’sshipswithflamingarrowswasacommonwayofsettingtheshipsonfire.Theburningmirrorandflamingarrowswouldhavebeeneffectiveataboutthesamedistance.SotheGreekshadnoreasontobuildaweaponlikeaburningmirror.听力部分Theclaimsthattheburningmirrorwouldhavebeenimpracticalandtechnologicallyimpossibleareunconvincing.

First,theGreeksdidnotneedtoformasinglesheetofcoppertomakealarge,burningmirror.Anexperimenthasshownthatdozensofsmallindividuallyflatpiecesofpolishedcoppercouldbearrangedintoaparabolicshapeandformalarge,burningmirror.TheGreekmathematiciansknowthepropertiesoftheparabolaandsocouldhavedirectedtheassemblyofsmallmirrorpiecesintotheparabolicshape.Second,abouthowlongitwouldtaketosetashiponfirewithaburningmirror.Theexperimentthereadingselectionmentionsassumesthattheburningmirrorwasusedtosetthewoodoftheboatonfire,that’swhattakestenminutes.ButRomanboatswerenotmadejustofwood.Therewereothermaterialsinvolvedaswell.Forexample,tosealthespacesbetweenwoodenboardsandmakethemwaterproof,theancientboat-buildersusedastickysubstancecalledpitch.Pitchcatchesfirequickly.Anexperimentshowedthatpitchcouldbesetonfirebyaburningmirrorinseconds.Andoncethepitchwasburning,thefirewouldspreadtothewoodeveniftheshipwasmoving.Soaburningmirrorcouldhaveworkedquicklyenoughtobeaneffectiveweapon.Third,whybotherwithaburningmirrorinsteadofflamingarrows?Well,Romansoldierswerefamiliarwithflamingarrowsandwouldhavebeenwatchingforthemandwerereadytoputoutthefirestheymightcause.Butyoucannotseetheburningraysfromamirror.Youjustseethemirror.Butthensuddenlyandmagicallyafirestartsatsomeunobservedplaceontheship,thatwouldhavebeenmuchmoresurprisingandthereforemuchmoreeffectivethanaflamearrow.笔记demo满分模板综合写作模板1

Thereadingpassagestatesthat...Theprofessoropposesthisstatement.Inthelecture,s/herevealsthreepiecesofevidencetosupporthis/herperspective.

First,whereasthereadingpassageassumesthat...（阅读的分论点+一两句论述）,theprofessorarguesinthelecturethat...(听力细节)Apparently,theprofessor'sargumentdivergesfromitscounterpartinthereading.

Inaddition,despitetheargumentinthereadingthat..,（阅读的分论点+一两句论述）theprofessordemonstratesthat...（听力细节）Inotherword,..(转述听力的第二个分论点)

Finally,th