版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领
文档简介
Epidermalgrowthfactorreceptor-tyrosinekinaseinhibitorinnon-small-celllungcancerYuh-MinChen,MD,PhD.ChestDept.,TaipeiVGH7/30/20231Survival
(anti-apoptosis)PI3-KActivationoftheepidermalgrowthfactorreceptortyrosinekinase(EGFR-TK):apivotaldriverofcarcinogenesisEGFR-TKEGFRLigandRASRAFSOSGRB2PTENAKTSTAT3MEKGenetranscriptionCell-cycleprogressionDNAMycMycCyclinD1JunFosPPMAPKProliferation/
maturationChemotherapy/
radiotherapy
resistanceAngiogenesisMetastasisBalabanetal1996;Akimotoetal1999;Wells1999;Woodburn1999;
Hanahan2000;Raymondetal2000CyclinD1pYpYpY7/30/20232RppRExtracellularIntracellularMembranepKpKpppTGFaSubstrateSubstrateSignallingMoleculesProliferationInhibitApoptosisAngiogenesisMetastasisNucleusMonoclonalAntibodiesEGFRTyrosineKinaseInhibitors7/30/20233IDEAL1and2trialdesignGefitinib250mg/dayGefitinib
500mg/dayContinuegefitinibuntildisease
progressionorunacceptabletoxicityIDEAL,IressaTMDoseEvaluationinAdvancedLungcancer
RandomisationIDEAL1(n=209)
1or2priorregimensIDEAL2(n=216)
>2priorregimens
PrimaryendpointsObjectivetumourresponseSymptomimprovement(IDEAL2)Safety(IDEAL1)7/30/20234Mediantimetoimprovement-symptomsandQOL*Timeof1stassessmentMediantimetoimprovement,days
Symptom/QOLmeasureLCSFACT-L8*29*7/30/20235IDEAL1and2:overallsurvival
bysymptomimprovement(250mg/day)Probability1.00.80.60.40.20.0IDEAL1MonthsfromrandomisationImprovementNoimprovement2740183013.33.5Patients
(n)Deaths
(n)Median(months)024681012141618204458265613.63.7Patients(n)Deaths
(n)Median(months)1.00.80.60.40.20.0ProbabilityIDEAL2Monthsfromrandomisation02468101214161820Douillardetal2002;Lynchetal20037/30/20236ISEL(IRESSASurvivalEvaluationinLungCancer):
ClinicalTrialDesignRandomisationGefitinib(250mg)+*BSCPlacebo+*BSCSURVIVALSecondary:TTF,ORQoL,safetyPrimary
endpoint:ENDBENEFIT2:1ratio
AdoubleblindPhaseIIIsurvivalstudycomparingIRESSA(250mg)plusBSCvs.placeboplusBSCinpatientswithadvancedNSCLCwhohavereceived1–2priorchemotherapyregimensandarerefractoryorintoleranttotheirmostrecentregimen1692patientsin210centresacross28countries342patientsoforientaloriginNoJapanese/USsites*BSC=BestSupportiveCareLancet2005;366:1527-377/30/20237ISEL-OverallSurvivalPercentsurvivingTime(months)Atrisk:Gefitinib112910239017615884553252451751137645199
——
IRESSA
------PlaceboPlacebo563517446382289220160115774428201242GefitinibplaceboMedian(months)5.65.11yrsurvival27%21%HR=0.89(0.77,1.02),p=0.0871StratifiedlogranktestN=1692,deaths=976Coxanalysis,p=0.02997/30/20238ISELSurvival:OrientalsPercentsurvivingTime(months)Atrisk:Gefitinib235221199179145119957864514025128
——
IRESSA
------Placebo
Placebo107978474564335292213873115.5M9.5M7/30/20239JChemother2005;17:6797/30/202310RESULTS3CR,9PR,withaR.R.of33.3%
SD14,controlrateof72.2%Alltreatment-relatedtoxicitieswerefewandmildinseverity,exceptonepatientsufferedfromreversiblegrade3interstitialpneumonitis
JChemother2005;17:6797/30/202311%SurvivalMediansurvival:9.5monthsOne-yearsurvivalrate:45.1%JChemother2005;17:6797/30/202312%SurvivalFig.10102030405060708090100036912151821MonthsCompleteorpartialresponse(n=12)median20.1MStableorprogressivedisease(n=24)median4.7MSurvivalaccordingtoresponseornot15.4月JChemother2005;17:6797/30/202313StudyDesignofBR.21
Stratifiedby:CentrePS(0/1vs2/3)Responsetoprior
treatment(CR/PR:SD:PD)
Priorregimens(1vs2)Priorplatinum
(yesvsno)Tarceva
150mgdailyPlaceboRANDOMISEPS=performancestatus21NEnglJMed2005;353:123–327/30/202314BR.21:Significant
clinicalpredictorsofresponsetoTarcevaTarceva
treatedpts(n)R.R.(%)
pvalue*GenderFemale(146)14.40.006Male(281)6.1HistologyAdenocarcinoma(209)13.9<0.001Other(218)4.1EthnicityAsian(53)18.90.02Other(374)7.5Eversmoked**Yes(311)3.8<0.001No(93)24.7Unknown(23)13.0*Significancebetweensubgroups**DatacollectedretrospectivelyInmultiplelogistic-regressionanalyses,onlyneverhavingsmoked(p<0.001)andadenocarcinomahistology(p=0.01)wereassociatedwithresponseShepherdetal.NEJM2005;353:1237/30/202315ImprovementinSurvivalwithTarceva42.5%improvementinmediansurvivalSurvivaldistributionfunctionSurvivaltime(months)HR=0.73,p<0.001*1.000.750.500.2500 5 10 15 20 25 30TarcevaPlaceboNEnglJMed2005;353:123–32
Tarceva
(n=488)
Placebo
(n=243)
Mediansurvival(months)
6.7
4.7
1-yearsurvival(%)
31
21
7/30/202316BR.21:Timetosymptomdeterioration(months)
Placebo
Tarceva179
179
153
n348
353
298
n1.9
(1.8–2.8)2.9
(2–4.8)3.7
(2–4.9)Median
(95%CI)0.02
2.8
(2.4–3)Pain
0.01
4.7
(3.8–6.2)Dyspnea
0.04
4.9
(3.8–7.4)Cough
pvalue*Median
(95%CI)*Log-ranktest,unadjustedformultiplesymptomsBezjakA,etal.JClinOncol2006;24:3831–7ShepherdF,etal.NEnglJMed2005;353:123–327/30/202317TRUST:TarcevaMO18109
AnexpandedaccessclinicalprogramofTarceva(erlotinib)inptswithadvancedstageIIIB/IVNSCLC
LungCancer20217/30/202318PatientPopulation&ResponseFromMay2005toJuly2006,300patientswereenteredfrom14hospitalsinTaiwan.Thisanalysiswasbasedon299patientswhoreceivedatleastonedoseofTarceva.7/30/202319ResponserateandcontrolratebypretreatmentcharacteristicsandskintoxicityPatientcharacteristicsPatientnumberResponserate(%)p-valueControlrate(%)p-valueGenderMaleFemale1401332037.60.001363.682.70.0004Age<65
6516011334.420.40.011573.172.60.9185Performancestatus0/123226351228.822.941.70.46910.339272.671.483.30.88850.4124StageIIIBIV5621517.931.20.049269.673.50.5651HistologyAdenocarcinomaSquamouscellcarcinoma1904834.712.50.00277960.40.0079PresenttreatmentasSecondlineThirdline16710229.926.50.541370.776.50.2983SmokingstatusNon-smokerFormerorcurrentsmoker15811533.521.70.03379.164.40.0067Skintoxicity-1NorashRash2924410.330.70.021641.476.6<0.0001Skintoxicity-2Norashorgrade1Rashgrade2,3,or411915419.335.70.00361.381.80.0002Thebestresponserateswerea29%partialresponseand44%stablediseasein273patientswhohadresponsedataavailable.Non-smoking(p=0.033),adenocarcinoma/BAC(p=0.0027),female(p=0.0013),agedlessthan65years(p=0.0115),stageIV(p=0.0492),patientswithskinrash(p=0.0216),andahighergradeofskinrash(p=0.003)weresignificantlycorrelatedwithresponsetotreatment.7/30/2023200.000.250.500.751.00Progressionfreesurvival(Months)061020CensoredobservationsFig.1Freefromprogression8421214161822Timetodiseaseprogressionof299NSCLCptstreatedwitherlotinib.Themediantimetodiseaseprogressionwas5.6months(95%C.I.:4.4–6.5months,45ptscensored)7/30/202321EGFR-TKIvs.chemotherapeuticagentsinsalvagechemotherapy7/30/202322Inconclusion,bothchemotherapeuticagents,suchasdocetaxelaloneorgemcitabine+vinorelbine,andgefitinib,areappropriatesalvageregimensforChineseNSCLCptswhohavefailedpreviouschemotherapy.However,gefitinibhasabettersafetyprofileandprobablybettersurvivalthanthechemotherapeuticagents,andwouldbeanappropriatealternativechoiceforsalvagechemotherapy,eveninasecond-linesettingforChinesepts.
JThoracOncol2006;1:545-507/30/202323EfficacyofSalvageTherapyinNSCLCTrialScheduleR.R.,%MTP,MMSur,M1-Yr,%SingleagentGemcitabine1200mg/m2D1,8,15q4wks12.52.17.540Docetaxel3535mg/m2D1,8,15q4wks17.24.28.433.44040mg/m2D1,8q3wks10.93.57.4357575mg/m2D1q3wks6.12.87.830.3Gefitinib250mgdaily33.34.79.340.8DoubletDocetaxel+IfosfamideD60mg/m2+I3gm/m2D1q3wks1058.226.1Docetaxel+GemcitabineD30mg/m2+G800mg/m2D1,8q3wks36.13.85.733.3Vinorelbine+GemcitabineV20mg/m2+G800mg/m2D1,8,15q4wks31.34.68.334.3Vinorelbine+CisplatinV20mg/m2D1,8,15+C50mg/m2D1q4wks9.53.77.619.77/30/202324SalvageChemotherapy(n=342)Grade¾Neutroopenia7/30/202325SalvageChemotherapy(n=342)Grade¾FatigueDocetaxel40andvinorelbinepluscisplatininducedmorefrequentseverefatiguethanotherregimens.Patientsthatreceivedsingle-agentgemcitabineandgefitinibreportednoseverefatiguesensation.7/30/202326InterestINTEREST(gefitinibvs.docetaxelinptswithLAormeta.NSCLCpre-treatedwithplatinum-basedchemotherapyWCLC20071466ptsfromMar2004toFeb20067/30/202327InterestQoFandsymptomimprovementWCLC20077/30/202328InterestWCLC20077/30/202329InterestOverallsurvival7/30/202330Clinicalcharacteristics&responserate(ptnumber=1974)IntJClinOncol2006;11:190–87/30/202331EGFRMutationEurJCancer2006:17-23NEnglJMed2004;350:2129-397/30/202332FailureofDoubletChemotherapyplusEGFR-TKIINTACTI,IITRIBUTE,TALENT7/30/202333Giaccone.JCO2004;22:777OverallSurvivalofINTACT-1inEachTreatmentGroup(GEM+CDDPc/sIressa)PoorsurvivalforthoseuseIressawithGEM+CDDP7/30/202334Canwefurtherprolongdisease-freesurvivalandoverallsurvival?FailureofdoubletchemotherapyplusTKIINTACTI,II(Gefitinib);TRIBUTE,TALENT(Erlotinib)MajorityperformedinCaucasianptsUnknownforAsianptswithhighEGFRmutationrateToassesstheefficacyofaddingchronicintermittentlow-dosevinorelbinetogefitinibtreatmentforadenocarcinomaoflungwhofailedtwoormoreregimensofchemotherapy.
7/30/2023357/30/202336ConclusionsAdditionoflow-dosevinorelbinetogefitinibhasshownhighefficacyinadenocarcinomalungcancerpatientswhohavefailedtwopreviousregimensofchemotherapy.GiventhefactthattherearefournegativephaseIIIrandomizedtrialsofEGFRTKI'swithchemotherapy(INTACTIandII,TRIBUTE,TALENT),
onlystudiesinselectedEGFRmutation-enrichedpatientpopulationscanbejustifiedatthistimeforfurtherclinicaltrialscombiningchemotherapywithEGFRTKIs.7/30/202337%FreefromProgression1-yearprogression-freesurvivalratewas57.1%intheGVarmand21.2%intheGarm(p=0.008)7/30/202338ErlotinibinducesG1arrestwhichcanblockM-phaseactivityofdocetaxelDocetaxelinducesM-phasearrestandapoptosisthatisenhancedbyerlotinibSequence–specificInteractionClinLungCancer2006;7:3857/30/202339First-lineAsianSequentialTarcevaplusChemotherapyTrial(FAST-ACT):StudyDesignPlaceboErlotinib150mg/dayPreviouslyuntreatedstageIIIB/IVNSCLC(n=150)R11PDSixcyclesgemcitabine+cisplatinorcarboplatin+placebo;q4wksSixcyclesgemcitabine(d1,8)+cisplatin(d1)orcarboplatin(d1)+erlotinib(d15–28);q4wksPDStratifiedbycentre,stage,
histology,smokingstatusStudytreatmentPost-treatmentScreeningPost-studyGemcitabine1250mg/m2(d1,8);cisplatin75mg/m2ORcarboplatin5×AUC(d1);erlotinib150mg/day(d15–28)PASCO2021;26:a80317/30/202340TimetoDiseaseProgression1.00.80.60.40.20
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36Time(weeks)
38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58
76 72 72 72 64 61 58 58 58 52 50 50 46 37 36 32 26 15 14 78 76 76 76 67 59 58 56 50 43 43 41 35 25 24 22 16 8 7
12 10 9 8 7 5 5 5 3 1 0 5 4 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0No.atriskErlotinibPlaceboEarlyandconsistentseparationofcurvesMedianTTP
(weeks)GC-erlotinib31.4GC-placebo24.1Log-ranktestp=0.0185HR=0.5695%CI:0.37–0.8424.131.4PASCO2021;26:a8031R.R.36.8%24.4%Howlongshouldchemotherapybegiven(noPDSatmaintenancephase)GEMCDDPdose(controlarm)islessthanusualBetterforthoseCaucasianswhohavehigher%ofEGFRwildtype7/30/202341FirstlinetreatmentwithEGFR-TKIsinthosewithEGFRmutatedpatients7/30/20234298ptsunderwentEGFRscreeningandmutationsweredetectedin34(35%).EGFRmutations:exon19deletions(53%),L858R(26%)31ptsreceivedgefitinib,R.R.55%,medianprogression-freesurvival9.2M.Therapywaswelltolerated.JClinOncol2021;26:2442-97/30/202343Percentchangeinmeasurabletumoratbestresponse,byindividualpatientJClinOncol2021;26:2442-97/30/202344Kaplan-Meiercurvesfor(A)progression-freesurvivaland(B)overallsurvivalamongalltreatedptsJClinOncol2021;26:2442-9PFS9.2MSur17.5M7/30/202345GefitinibfirstlinetreatmentinenrichedEGFR-mutatedNSCLCinNTUHN=106(adenoca97,non-adeno9)PtNoRR,%DCR,%MedianTTF,MMedianOS,MAll10650.982.15.522.4EGFRmutated556987.3824wildtype352068.63.412.9notdone1656.393.85.6NRJCO2021;26:2745-53PtNoRR,%MedianTTF,MExon19deletion20958.9Exon21L858R2373.99.17/30/202346PredictiveFactorsofResponsetoGefitinibin152EGFRmutatedpatientsinNTUHVariablesNoResponserates(%)UnivariatePMultivariatePN=152L858R7565.30.646
DelinExon197768.8
Chemonaive9175.80.0050.006Chemo-treated6154.1
Female11071.80.0450.053Male4254.8
Smoker2254.60.175
Non-smoker13069.2
<=65years7017.90.789>65years8213.7
WuJYetal.AJRCCM20217/30/202347Nosurvivaldifferencein152chemonaiveorchemo-treatedEGFRmutatedpatientsinNTUHChmonaïvegefitinib(n=91)Chemotherapytreatedgefitinib(n=61)logrankChmonaïvegefitinib(n=91)Chemotherapytreatedgefitinib(n=61)logrank=0.24WuJYetal.AJRCCM20217/30/2023482003.9.15s/p4lineC/Tsince20010629,PS3FiO250%2003.9.29Iressa2weeksPS1roomairAnother1.5year7/30/202349Ms.ReeHxNo3167688775Y/O20021202SOBformonths,PS2-3,NC3L/minpreC/T20050804postNGC;taxotere;underIressa-N,PS07/30/202350s/prenaltransplantationwith
adenocarcinoma,LUL,&brain,meningealcarcinomatosisNotappropriateforchemotherapy,receivefirstlineTarcevawithtotaldisappearanceofmeningealcarcinomatosis&brainmetastases(brainMRIfollow-up6monthsafterTarcevatreatment)TarcevafirstlinetreatmentPatientstillaliveatpresent7/30/202351T790MPaoetal.PLoSMed2005;2:1-11Kwaketal.ProNatAcadSciUSA2005;102:7665-708of16TKItreatedhad2ndmutation:7of8wasT790M
ClinCancerRes2006;12:6494-501T790Maccountsfor50%acquiredresistancetoEGFR-TKIsC-METamplificationacc
温馨提示
- 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
- 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
- 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
- 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
- 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
- 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。
最新文档
- 深圳2025年广东深圳科学高中招聘临聘教师笔试历年参考题库附带答案详解
- 二零二五年度虫草产品绿色认证与市场准入合同4篇
- 2025年度城市轨道交通建设项目工程合同
- 语文阅读教学中的探究式学习模式研究
- 2025年牛津译林版必修1历史上册月考试卷含答案
- 二零二五年度病虫害防治与生态修复工程承包合同4篇
- 2025年粤教新版四年级语文下册月考试卷
- 2025年鲁教新版九年级历史上册月考试卷含答案
- 2025年浙教版选择性必修三语文下册阶段测试试卷
- 2025年苏教版九年级历史上册月考试卷含答案
- 环境监测对环境保护的意义
- 2023年数学竞赛AMC8试卷(含答案)
- 神经外科课件:神经外科急重症
- 2024年低压电工证理论考试题库及答案
- 2023年十天突破公务员面试
- 《疯狂动物城》中英文对照(全本台词)
- 医院住院医师规范化培训证明(样本)
- 小学六年级语文阅读理解100篇(及答案)
- 气功修炼十奥妙
- 安徽省物业服务标准
- 勾股定理的历史与证明课件
评论
0/150
提交评论