2023年韩素音青年翻译奖竞赛原文_第1页
2023年韩素音青年翻译奖竞赛原文_第2页
2023年韩素音青年翻译奖竞赛原文_第3页
2023年韩素音青年翻译奖竞赛原文_第4页
2023年韩素音青年翻译奖竞赛原文_第5页
已阅读5页,还剩4页未读 继续免费阅读

下载本文档

版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领

文档简介

It’sTimetoRethink‘Temporary’Wetendtoviewarchitectureaspermanent,asaspiringtothestatusofmonuments.Andthatkindofarchitecturehasitsplace.Butsodoesarchitectureofadifferentsort.Formostofthefirstdecadeofthe2023s,architecturewasaboutthestatementbuilding.Whetheritwasacontroversialmemorialoranimpossiblyluxuriouscondotower,architecture’sraisond’êtrewastomakealastingimpression.Architecturehasalwaysbeensynonymouswithpermanence,butshoulditbe?Inthelastfewyears,theoppositemaybetrue.Architecturalbillingsareatanall-timelow.Majorcommissionsarefewandfarbetween.Thearchitecturethat’sbeenmakingnewsisfastandfleeting:pop-upshops,foodcarts,marketplaces,performancespaces.Andwhilemanymanifestations(临床表现,显示,证明)ofthegenre(类型,流派,风俗画)havejumpedtheshark(鲨鱼,骗子。欺诈,诈骗)(i.e.,aToysRUspop-upshop),thereisundeniable(不可否认的,公认的)opportunityinthetemporary:itisanapt(恰当的,有、、、倾向,灵敏的)responsetoacivilizationinflux.(流量,变迁,不稳定,流出)Andlikemanyprevailing(一般的,最普通的,流行的,占优势的)trends—collaborative(合作的,协作的)consumption(消费,消耗)(a.k.a.,“sharing”),communitygardens,barterandtrade—“temporary”issoretro(复古的,重新流行的)thatit’sbecomeradical(激进的,彻底的,主线的).InNovember,Ihadthepleasureofmoderating(减速的,慢化的)Motopia(抱负都市环境),apanel(座谈小组)atUniversityofSouthernCalifornia’sSchoolofArchitecture,withRobertKronenburg,anarchitect,professoratUniversityofLiverpool(利物浦)andportable/temporary/mobileguru(领袖,专家).Authorofashelffullofbooksonthetopic,including“Flexible:ArchitecturethatRespondstoChange,”“PortableArchitecture:DesignandTechnology”and“HousesinMotion:TheGenesis(发生起源),”Kronenburgisamanobsessed.(迷人的)Mobility(移动性,机动性)hasaninnate(先天的,固有的,与生俱来的)potency(力量,潜力,权势),Kronenburgbelieves.Movable(动产的,可移动的,不固定的)environmentsaremoredynamic(动态的,动力的,有活力的)thanstatic(静态的)ones,sowhyshouldarchitecturebesostatic?Theideathatperhapsallbuildingsshouldn’taspire(渴望,立志,追求)topermanencerepresentsahugeshiftforarchitecture.Withoutthatburden,architects,designers,buildersanddeveloperscantakeadvantageofandimplement(实行,执行,实现,生效)currenttechnologiesfaster.Architecturecouldbereusable(可再度使用的,可反复使用的),recyclableandsustainable(可以忍受的,足以支撑的,养得起的).Recast(重铸,彻底改动)inthisway,itcouldbettersolveseeminglyunsolvableproblems.Andstillsucceedincreatingasenseofplace.Inhispresentation,Kronenburgofferedexamplesofhowportable,temporaryarchitecturehasbeenusedineveryaspectofhumanactivity,includinghealthcare(fromFlorenceNightingale’sredesignedhospitalstotheAirstream(气流)trailersusedasmobilemedicalclinics(诊所)duringtheKennedyAdministration),housing(fromyurts(圆形帐篷)totents(旅游帐篷,住所)toarchitectShigeruBan’spost-earthquakepaperhouses),cultureandcommerce(贸易,商业)(stagesetsandGreatExhibitionbuildings,centuries-oldBouqinistesalongtheSeine,(塞纳河)mobilefood,artandmusicvenues(场地)offeringeverythingfromtherecordingofstoriestotastycrème(奶油,烈性甜酒)brulees.)Kronenburgmadeacompelling(引人注目的,强制的,激发爱好的)argumentthattheexperimentation(实验,实验方法,实验过程)inherent(固有的,内在的,与生俱来的)insuchstructures(结构,构筑物)challengespreconceived(预想的,事先形成的)notions(观念,小商品)aboutwhatbuildingscanandshouldbe.Thestrategyoftemporality(俗事,暂时性,俗人,),heexplained,“adaptstounpredictabledemands,providesmoreforless(更少),andencouragesinnovation.(革新,改革,创新,新事物,新发明,新方法,新设施,新制度)”Andhestressedthatit’stimeforend-users(最终用户,终端用户),designers,architects,manufacturers(制造商,厂商)andconstructionfirmstorethinktheirattitudetowardtemporary,portableandmobilearchitecture.Thisisastruefordevelopmentandcityplanningasitisforarchitecture.City-makingmayhavehappenedallatonceatthedesksofmasterplannerslikeDanielBurnhamorRobertMoses,butthat’sreallynotthewaythingshappentoday.Nosinglemasterplancananticipate(预期,盼望,占先,提前使用)theevolvingandvaried(多变的,各式各样的)needsofanincreasinglydiverse(不同的,多种多样的,变化多的)populationorachievetheresiliency(弹性,跳回),responsiveness(响应能力,有同情心)andflexibilitythatshorter-term,experimental(实验的,根据实验的,实验性的)endeavors(努力,尽力)can.Whichisnottosaylong-termplanningdoesn’thaveitsplace.Thetwoworkwellhandinhand(联合).MikeLydon,foundingprincipal(校长,委托人,当事人,资本,主犯)ofTheStreetPlansCollaborative(合作的,协作的),arguesforinjecting(注射)spontaneity(自发性,自然发生)intourban(城市的,住在都市的)development,andseesthesetemporaryinterventions(干预,干涉,处置)(whathecalls“tactical(战术的,策略的,善于策略的)urbanism(都市生活,都市集中)”)asshort-termactionstoeffectlong-termchange.Thoughthere’sbeentremendous(极大的,惊人的,巨大的)mediaattentiongiventoquickandcheapprojectslikeSanFrancisco’sPavementtoParksandNewYork’s“gutter(排水沟,槽,贫民区)cafes,”Lydonseessomethingbiggerthanfodder(饲料,素材)forthestylesection.“Alotofthesethingswerenotjustfunandcool,”hesays.“Itwasnotjustabottom-up(自底向上的,从细节到总体的)effort.It’snotD.I.Y.urbanism.It’sacontinuum(连续统,连续统一体,闭联集)ofideas,techniquesandtactics(策略,战术,用兵学)beingemployedatalldifferentscales.”“We’reseeingalotofthesethingsemerge(浮现,摆脱,暴露)forthreereasons,”Lydoncontinues.“One,theeconomy.Peoplehavetobemorecreativeaboutgettingthingsdone.Two,theInternet.Evenfourorfiveyearsagowecouldn’tsharetacticsandtechniquesvia(取道,通过,经由)YouTube(视频网站)orFacebook(脸谱网).Somethingcanhappenrandomly(随便地,任意地,无目的,胡乱地,未加计划地)inDallas(达拉斯)andnowwecanhearaboutitrightaway.Thisisfeedinginto(送入)thisideaofgrowth,ofbi-coastalcompetitionbetweenNewYorkandSanFrancisco,say,aboutwhodoesthecooler(冷却器,清凉剂),betterthings.Andthree,demographic(人口记录学的,人口学的)shifts(意味,换班制).Urbanneighborhoods(城乡)aregentrifying(使优化,修复或改善,使显得高雅,使中产阶级化),changing.They’rebringinginpeoplelookingtoimproveneighborhoodsthemselves.Peoplearesmartandengaged(使用中的,忙碌的)andworkinga40-hourweek.Buttheyhaveenoughsparetimetogetinvolvedandthisseemslikeanaturalstep.”Lydonisn’tadvocating(提倡,主张,拥护)anendtoplanningbutencouragesmoreshort-termdoing,experimenting,testing(whichcanbeafarmoresatisfyingalternativetowaitingforprojectstopass).Whilethismaynotdirectlychangeexistingcodes(法典)orzoningregulations,(分区制条例)that’sO.K.because,asLydonexplains,thepracticesemployed“shineadirectlightonoldwaysofthinking,oldpoliciesthatareinplace.”TheDallasgroupBuildaBetterBlock(更好的阻止)—whichquicklyleapt(跳跃)fromatiny(微小的,很少的)grass-roots(基层的,基本的,一般民众的)collectivetoanactivepartnerincityendeavors—hasdemonstrated(证明,展示,论证)thatwhenyouexposeweaknesses,changehappens.Iftheirtemporaryinterventionsviolate(违反,侵犯,妨碍,亵渎)existingcodes,BuildaBetterBlockjustpaintsasigninformingpassers-byofthatfact.Theyhavealtered(改变)regulationsinthisfashion(照这样).Sometimes—notalways—bureaucracy(官僚主义,官僚机构,官僚政治)getsoutofthewayandallowsforrealchangetohappen.Testingthingsoutcanalsohelpdeveloperschart(具体计划)therightcoursefortheirprojects.SaysLydon,“Adevelopercanreallylearnwhat’sworkingintheneighborhoodfromamarketplace(市场,商场,市集)perspective(观点,远景)—itcouldreallyinformorchangetheirplans.Hopefullytheycaningratiate(使迎合,使讨好,使逢迎)themselveswiththeneighborhoodandbuildcommunity.Thereisrealpotential(也许性)ifthedevelopersarereallylookingtodothat.”Andtheyare.Brooklyn’sDeKalbMarket,forexample,wassupposedtobeinplaceforjustthreeyears,butbecameaneighborhoodcenterwheretherehadn’tbeenmuchofonebefore.“Peoplegravitated(被吸引)towardsit,”saysLydon.“Peoplelikegoingthere.Youruntheriskofpeoplelamenting(哀悼,悲痛,惋惜)thelossofthat.Thedeveloperwouldbesmarttointegrate(使完整,使成为整体)thingslikethecommunitygarden—[givingresidentsan]opportunitytokeepgrowingfoodonthesite(现场).Theradiostationcouldgeta(永恒的,永久的,不变的)space.Thebeergardencouldbekept.”SanFrancisco’sPROXYprojectissimilar.Retail,restaurantsandculturalspaceshoused(封装的)withinanartful(巧妙的,狡猾的,有技巧的,欺诈的)configuration(配置,结构,外形)ofshippingcontainers(运送集装箱),designedbyEnvelopeArchitectureandDesign,weregivenafive-yeartemporaryhome(临时住所)ongovernment-ownedvacantlots(空地)inthecity’sHayesValleyneighborhoodwhiledevelopersopted(选择)tosittight(稳坐不动,坚持主张,静待事态的发展)duringtherecession(衰退,不景气,后退,凹处).Affordablehousingispromisedforthesite(经济合用房是承诺的地方);thedeveloperswillnowbeabletocreateitinaneighborhoodthathasbecomeincreasinglyvibrant(震动的,充满气愤的,响亮的,战栗的)andpedestrian-friendly.Onanevenlargerscale,themajordeveloperForestCity(森林之城)hasbeentestingtheseideasoftrialanderror(反复实验,尝试错误法)inthe5MProjectindowntownSanFrancisco.Whilewaitingoutthedownturn,(经济方面衰退,低迷时期)thefolks(人们)behind5Mhavebeenbeta-testing(对新产品进行beta因素测试)tenants(房客,居住者)andusesattheir5th&Mission(使命,任务,代表团)location,whichwas(andstillis)hometotheSanFranciscoChronicleandnowalsotoorganizationslikeTechShop,theco-working(合作办公)spaceHubSoma,theartgalleryIntersectionfortheArts(美术馆的十字路口艺术),thetechcompanySquareandasmatteringoffoodcartstofeedthosehungry,hardworkingtenants(高科技公司的广场和少数食品车来喂那些饥饿的,勤奋的房客).Afewyearsearlier,ForestCitywouldhavebeenmorelikelytothrowupanofficetowerwithsomeluxurycondosontopandcallitaday:accordingtoacompanyvicepresident,AlexaArena,therecessionallowedForestCitytospendtime“re-imaginingplacesforo

温馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
  • 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
  • 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
  • 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
  • 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

评论

0/150

提交评论