讲义第一模块阅读清单

，2015《金融的逻辑1：金融何以富民强国》，西学以及 ，2015《金融的逻 2：通往路》，西学为什么中国的钱这么多？为什么钱多了反而不安？为什么说大国崛起靠的是制度而非掠夺？为什么有钱不如民间富有？为什么说养儿防老“不道德”？1》探讨金融发展和一般市场发展对文化和社会带来的影响。作者从理论到事实对西方金融的发展，追溯，解读资本，剖析金融危家文化进行金融学，直言市场经济是个人解放的必由，发展金融的唯社。或英文原版｜forFerguson,N.,2002,PaperandIron:HamburgBusinessandGermanPoliticsintheEraofInflation,1897-1927,CambridgeUniversityPress.《纸与铁》提出了全新的观点，以颇有的汉堡工商界为切入点，分析了为通货膨胀政策辩护的那些理由存在的，通货膨胀严重危害了德国经济，侵蚀了资产社会的根基，使魏玛这个福利国家失信于民。此外，通货膨胀也没能使赔款减少。作者剖析了长期以来德国政治经济体系的弊端。不仅揭示了魏玛的失败根源可以追溯到德国时期，而且还为分析第三的兴起提供了不同的视角。在《纸与铁》德国经济和政治之间关系的生动阐述中，相信你一定会从一个全新1923年德国的恶性通货膨胀是历史上少数影响深远的经济之一，人们普遍认为它是导致发迹的根源。然而，近年来有很多历史学家认为，通货膨胀政策不但刺激了经济增长，而且还帮助德国减少了赔款，因此对于1918年以后的德国是FeweconomiceventshavehadamoreprofoundorenduringimpactthantheGermanhyperinflationof1923,stillrememberedpopularlyasarootcauseofHitler'srisetopower.Yetmanyhistorianshavearguedthatinflationarypolicieswere,onbalance,advantageoustopost-1918Germany,bothboostinggrowthandheltoreducereparations.Thescholarlyconsensusisthattherewasnoviablealternativetoinflation.InPaperandIronNiallFergusontakesadifferentview.Hearguesthatinflationwasindeedaneconomicandpoliticaldisaster,andfurtherthattherewerealternativeeconomicpoliciesthatcouldhavestabilisedtheGermancurrencyin1920.Toexinwhythesewerenotadoptedhepointstolong-termdefectsinthepoliticalinstitutionsoftheReichthatwentbackasfarasthe1890sandwhichpersistedbeyond1918.ThebookthereforerevealstheWilhelmineoriginsofWeimar'sfailure,aswellascastinglightontheoriginsoftheThirdReich.·桑顿（著），（译），2011《艺术世界中的7天》，中国人民大学。或译本 ese·桑顿（著，（译），2010《艺术市场探秘》，或英文原版｜forThornton,S.,2008,SevenDaysintheArtWorld,W.W.Norton&艺术市场一直在蓬勃发展，博物馆的参观人数激增，越来越多的人自称为艺术家。众为桑顿带领我们参观了得隆尔评Theartmarkethasbeenbooming.Museumattendanceissurging.Morepeoplethanevercallthemselvess.Contemporaryarthas eamassentertainment,aluxurygood,ajobdescription,and,forsome,akindofalternativereligion.Inaseriesofbeautifullypacednarratives,SarahThorntoninvestigatesthedramaofaChristie'sauction,theworkingsinTakashiMurakami'sstudios,theeliteattheBaselArtFair,theeccentricitiesofArtforummagazine,thecompetitionbehindanimportantartprize,lifeinanotoriousart-schoolseminar,andthewonderlandoftheVeniceBiennale.Sherevealsthenewdynamicsofcreativity,taste,status,money,andthesearchformeaninginlife.Ajudiciousandjuicyaccountoftheinstitutionsthathavethepowertoshapearthistory,basedonhundredsofinterviewswithhigh-profileyers,Thornton'sentertainingethnographywillchangethewayyoulookatcontemporaryculture.诺亚·霍洛维茨（著），／昌轶男（译，2013,《的艺术全球中的当代艺术品》，东北财经大学或英文原版｜forHorowitz,N.,2014,ArtoftheDeal:ContemporaryArtinaGlobal人们对于当代艺术的定义从未像今天这样与金钱紧密相连。艺术家作品的价格被推进行包装、和品牌打造。诺亚维茨揭示了当代艺术品市场的内在运作规律，阐述了这种独特的经济艺术和装置艺术这些新兴艺术形式是如何进入商业市场的。在2008年当代艺术泡灭背，者地视些展开术市藏的。Arttodayisdefinedbyitsrelationshiptomoneyasneverbefore.Priceshavebeendriventounprecedentedheights,conventionalboundarieswithintheartworldhavecollapsed,andsthinkevermorestrategicallyabouthowtoadvancetheircareers.Artisnolongersimplymade,butpackaged,sold,andbranded.InArtoftheDeal,NoahHorowitzexposestheinnerworkingsofthecontemporaryartmarket,exininghowthisuniqueeconomycametobe,howitworks,andwhereit'sheaded.Inanewpostscript,Horowitzreflectsontheevolutionofthetradesincethebook'soriginalreleasein2011,shininglightonthemarket'sascentaswellasitsmosturgentchallenges.戈弗雷·巴克（著，马维达（译）20141850年以来的艺或英文原版｜forBarker,G.,2008,VanityFair:TheRichandthePriceofArt,投资品的表现如何？2011年压倒而雄踞世界艺术品 榜之首的中国艺术市场有何独特之处？为何只有在、和，才能最为清楚地看到艺术品“在任何其他行业里会被称为的事情，在艺术市场上不过是一次友好的谈•巴克在本书中生动地讲述了在1850年到21世纪之间这个商业时代艺术品的故事，高端艺术品尤其是画作何精心设计，在短时间内转卖画作而得到五倍至五十倍的收益；19世纪艺术市场的某次繁荣又如何持续三十年之久——要紧的并非艺术品的价格，而是利润。但在作者一个人所能拥有的最美妙的物品。AJacksonPollockwentfor$140millionin2006,thegreatestsumpaidforaworkoftodate.Buttherecordprobablywon'tlastlong.Well-respectedexpertGodfreyBarkerstripsbackthelayersofpainttorevealthefraud,follyandprofitthathasledtotheriseandriseoftheinternationalartmarket-andrevealsthestoriesofsomeofthemostexpensivepaintingseversold.TheincredibleriseofpicturepricesbeganintheVictorianspeculativemarket,whenlivingsbegantobepricedhigherthanoldMasters.TheboomwasheightenedinthenextcenturybyHitler’sFuhrermuseumandtheexplosivemarketingtheImpressionists.After1960,AmericapumpedspeculativecashintoDeKooning,Warholandtherest,theirworkglowingbymorethan10,000%,andtoday,farfromcalmingdown,thesky-highspirallookssettogostratospheric.GodfreyBarkeristheworld'sleadingwriterontheartmarker,andhiscrisplywrittenandcolourfullyanecdotalbookwillproveparticularlycontroversialwithrevelationsandfiguresthatwillshockfinanciersandartinsiders,aswellastheworldatlarge.唐·汤普森（著，谭平（译），2013《疯狂经济学》，公司或英文原版｜forThompson,D.,2010,The$12MillionStuffedShark:TheCuriousEconomicsofContemporaryArt,St.Martin'sGriffin.人史蒂夫•科恩买下。一条死鲨鱼为什么值上亿的天价？其背后的价格驱动机制是什么？隐藏了怎样的经济学原理？为什么埃迪•的鲨鱼卖价只有赫斯特鲨鱼的杯哈根达斯的冰淇淋就是比其他冰淇淋贵，一款LV的真皮女包就是值那么多钱，一部汤姆•克鲁斯主演的烂片能成就票房?WhywouldasmartNewYorkinvestmentbankerpay$12millionforthedecaying,stuffedcarcassofashark?BywhatalchemydoesJacksonPollock'sdrippaintingNo.5,1948sellfor$140million?Intriguingandentertaining,The$12MillionStuffedSharkisaFreakonomicsapproachtotheeconomicsandpsychologyofthecontemporaryartworld.Whywererecordpricesachievedatauctionforworksby131contemporarysin2006alone,withastonishingnewheightsreachedin2007?DonThompsonexploresthemoney,lust,andself-aggrandizementoftheartworldinanattempttodeterminewhatmakesaparticularworkvaluablewhileothersareignored.Thisbookisthefirsttolookattheeconomicsandthemarketingstrategiesthatenablethemodernartmarkettogeneratesuchastronomicalprices.Drawingoninterviewswithpastandpresentexecutivesofauctionhousesandartdealerships,s,andthebuyerswhomovethemarket,Thompsonlaunchesthereaderonajourneyofdiscoverythroughthepeculiarworldofmodernart.Surprising,passionate,gossipy,revelatory,The$12MillionStuffedSharkrevealsagreatdealthatevenexperiencedauctionpurchasersdonotknow.Heilbroner.R.L.,1999,TheWorldlyPhilosophers:TheLives,TimesAndIdeasOfTheGreatEconomicThinkers,Touchstone.TheWorldlyPhilosophersnotonlyenablesustoseemoredeeplyintoourhistorybuthelpsusbetterunderstandourowntimes.Inthisseventhedition,RobertL.HeilbronerprovidesanewthemethatconnectsthinkersasdiverseasAdamSmithandKarlMarx.Thethemeisthecommonfocusoftheirhighlyvariedideas—namely,thesearchtounderstandhowacapitalistsocietyworks.Itisafocusnevermoreneededthaninthisageofconfusingeconomicheadlines.Inaboldnewconcludingchapterentitled“TheEndoftheWorldlyPhilosophy?”Heilbronerremindsusthattheword“end”referstoboththepurposeandlimitsofeconomics.Thischapterconveysaconcernthattoday’sincreasingly“scientific”economicsmayoverlookfundamentalsocialandpoliticalissuesthatarecentraltoeconomics.Thus,unlikeitspredecessors,this