文学翻译中的译者主体性：一种多视角研究

文学翻译中的译者主体性：一种多视角研究

英文题名TheTranslatorsSubjectivityinLiteraryTranslation:AMulti-PerspectiveStudy

关键词译者主体性;含义;体现;限制;英文关键词translatorssubjectivity;implication;embodiment;restriction;中文摘要传统的翻译研究主要关注的是翻译的标准、原则、风格及直译、意译的争论。然而,作为翻译主要因素之一的译者却很少受到专家学者的关注。最近几年,随着新的翻译学的研究方法和理论的出现,译者在翻译过程中所起的作用已成为翻译研究的热门话题和理论界关注的重点之一。作为翻译研究一个分支的译者主体性研究就这样应运而生了,并日渐成为翻译界广泛关注和讨论的对象。因此本文以阐释学、目的论、解构主义的积极意义为理论基石,从当前国内外对这一课题研究的现状出发,分析了国内外翻译史上译者边缘化文化地位的根源,并对翻译研究中的文化转向进行了回顾。从哲学、翻译和主体间性不同角度对译者主体性的内涵、特征进行了探讨,并从翻译过程的不同阶段来描述译者主体性的体现。尝试对文学翻译中最重要的却长期被人们忽视的因素-译者进行系统的全视角的探讨以期深化翻译主体的研究。通过以上分析本文阐明了翻译在本质上是一个创造性的过程而不是机械的语言转换。因此,译者作为翻译中最积极最重要的因素,在翻译过程中应该在尊重并忠实于原文的前提下充分发挥其主体性的作用更好地服务于读者并满足译语文化的需要,但同时还必须认识到译者不是一个孤立的存在,其主体性还体现在与其它翻译主体...英文摘要Thetraditionaltranslationstudyfocusedonthenature,criteria,principle,andskillsoftranslationandtheargumentbetween"literaltranslation"and"freetranslation".However,thetranslator,themostactiveparticipantintranslationhasattractedlittleattentionofspecialistsandscholarsoftranslationstudy.Inrecentyears,withtheemergenceofnewapproachesandtheoriesintranslationstudies,thecomplexrolethatthetranslatorplaysinthewholetranslatingprocesshasbecome

中文部分2-55

Acknowledgements7-8

中文摘要8-9

Abstract9-10

目录11-13

第一章前言13-15

第二章译者主体性研究回顾15-23

2.1译者卑微的历史地位15-18

2.1.1传统翻译研究中译者的作用与地位15-16

2.1.2语言学范式中译者的作用16-18

2.2对译者在翻译中重要作用的认识18-23

2.2.1文化转向与译者主体作用18

2.2.2目的论与译者主体性18-19

2.2.3阐释学理论与译者主体性19-20

2.2.4解构主义理论与译者主体性20-22

2.2.5小结22-23

第三章译者主体性的内涵23-31

3.1哲学上的主体与主体性23-25

3.1.1哲学上的主体23-24

3.1.2哲学上的主体性24-25

3.2翻译中的主体与主体性25-28

3.2.1翻译中的主体25-27

3.2.2翻译中的主体性27-28

3.3在主体间性的关系中研究译者主体性28-31

3.3.1译者与作者间的主体间性29

3.3.2译者与读者间的主体间性29-31

第四章译者主体性的体现31-43

4.1在翻译的准备阶段译者主体性的体现31-34

4.1.1在准备阶段译者的调查研究工作31-33

4.1.2在选择原文中译者主体性的体现33-34

4.2在翻译过程中译者主体性的体现34-41

4.2.1理解阶段的译者主体性34-36

4.2.2表达阶段的译者主体性36-41

4.3译者主体性在文化意识方面的体现41-43

第五章译者主体性的限制性因素43-48

5.1原文43-45

5.1.1原文本类型43-44

5.1.2语言障碍44-45

5.2意识形态45-46

5.3道德因素46-47

5.4历史文化因素47-48

第六章结论48-49

参考文献49-54

英文部分55-137

Acknowledgements61-62

中文摘要62-63

Abstract63-67

ChapterOne:Introduction67-70

ChapterTwo:RetrospectoftheStudiesontheTranslator'sSubjectivity70-84

2.1Theawkwardandlowstatusofthetranslator70-75

2.1.1Theroleandpositionofthetranslatorintraditionaltranslationstudies70-73

2.1.2TheTranslator'sroleinthelinguisticapproach73-75

2.2Recognitionofthetranslator'simportantroleintranslation75-84

2.2.1Culturalturnandtranslator'subjectiverole75-76

2.2.2Skopostheoryandthetranslator'ssubjectivity76-78

2.2.3Hermeneutictheoryandthetranslator'ssubjectivity78-80

2.2.4DeconstructionTheoryandthetranslator'ssubjectivity80-82

2.2.5Summary82-84

ChapterThree:ImplicationoftheSubjectivityoftheTranslation84-99

3.1ThesubjectandsubjectivityinPhilosophy84-87

3.1.1Thesubjectinphilosophy84-86

3.1.2Thesubjectivityinphilosophy86-87

3.2SubjectandSubjectivityinTranslation87-94

3.2.1Subjectintranslation87-91

3.2.2Subjectivityintranslation91-94

3.3Studythetranslator'ssubjectivityintheintersubjectiverelationship94-99

3.3.1Theintersubjectivitybetweenthetranslatorandtheauthor95-97

3.3.2Theintersubjectivitybetweenthetranslatorandthereader97-99

ChapterFour:TheEmbodimentsoftheTranslator'sSubjectivity99-121

4.1Thetranslator'ssubjectivityinthepreparationstageoftranslation99-104

4.1.1Translator'sresearchworkinthepreparationstageoftranslation99-102

4.1.2Translator'ssubjectivityinthechoiceofthetexts102-104

4.2TheTranslator'sSubjectivityintheTranslatingProcess104-117

4.2.1Translator'ssubjectivityintheunderstandingprocess104-108

4.2.2Translator'ssubjectivityintheproducingprocess108-117

4.3TheTranslator'sSubjectivityintheCulturalAwareness117-121

ChapterFive:RestrictionsontheTranslator'sSubjectivity121-130

5.1TheSourceText121-124

5.1.1Thetypeofthesourcetext121-124

5.1.2Thelanguageobstacles124

5.2Ideology124-126

5.3EthicValues126-128

5.4HistoricalandCulturalfactors128-130

ChapterSix:Conclusion130-132

References132-137

2.2.5Summary82-84

ChapterThree:ImplicationoftheSubjectivityoftheTranslation84-99

3.1ThesubjectandsubjectivityinPhilosophy84-87

3.1.1Thesubjectinphilosophy84-86

3.1.2Thesubjectivityinphilosophy86-87

3.2SubjectandSubjectivityinTranslation87-94

3.2.1Subjectintranslation87-91

3.2.2Subjectivityintranslation91-94

3.3Studythetranslator'ssubjectivityintheintersubjectiverelationship94-99

3.3.1Theintersubjectivitybetweenthetranslatorandtheauthor95-97

3.3.2Theintersubjectivitybetweenthetranslatorandthereader97-99

ChapterFour:TheEmbodimentsoftheTranslator'sSubjectivity99-121

4.1Thetranslator'ssubjectivityinthepreparationstageoftranslation99-104

4.1.1Translator'sresearchworkinthepreparationstageoftranslation99-102

4.1.2Translator'ssubjectivityinthechoiceofthetexts102-104

4.2TheTranslator'sSubjectivityintheTranslatingProcess104-117

4.2.1Translator'ssubjectivityintheunderstandingprocess104-108

4.2.2Translator'ssubjectivityintheproducingprocess108-117

4.3TheTranslator'sSubjectivityintheCulturalAwareness117-121

ChapterFive:RestrictionsontheTranslator'sSubjectivity121-130

5.1TheSourceText121-124

5.1.1Thetypeofthesourcetext121-124

5.1.2Thelanguageobstacles124

5.2Ideology124-126

5.3EthicValues126-128

5.4HistoricalandCulturalfactors128-130

ChapterSix:Conclusion130-132

References132-137

2.2.5Summary82-84

ChapterThree:ImplicationoftheSubjectivityoftheTranslation84-99

3.1ThesubjectandsubjectivityinPhilosophy84-87

3.1.1Thesubjectinphilosophy84-86

3.1.2Thesubjectivityinphilosophy86-87

3.2SubjectandSubjectivityinTranslation87-94

3.2.1Subjectintranslation87-91

3.2.2Subjectivityintranslation91-94

3.3Studythetranslator'ssubjectivityintheintersubjectiverelationship94-99

3.3.1Theintersubjectivitybetweenthetranslatorandtheauthor95-97

3.3.2Theintersubjectivitybetweenthetranslatorandthereader97-99

ChapterFour:TheEmbodimentsoftheTranslator'sSubjectivity99-121

4.1Thetranslator'ssubjectivityinthepreparationstageoftranslation99-104

4.1.1Translator'sresearchworkinthepreparationstageoftranslation99-102

4.1.2Translator'ssubjectivityinthechoiceofthetexts102-104

4.2TheTranslator'sSubjectivityintheTranslatingProcess104-117

4.2.1Translator'ssubjectivityintheunderstandingprocess104-108

4.2.2Translator'ssubjectivityintheproducingprocess108-117

4.3TheTranslator'sSubjectivityintheCulturalAwareness117-121

ChapterFive:RestrictionsontheTranslator'sSubjectivity121-130

5.1TheSourceText121-124

5.1.1Thetypeofthesourcetext121-124

5.1.2Thelanguageobstacles124

5.2Ideology124-126

5.3EthicValues126-128

5.4HistoricalandCulturalfactors128-130

ChapterSix:Conclusion130-132

References132-137

2.2.5Summary82-84

ChapterThree:ImplicationoftheSubjectivityoftheTranslation84-99

3.1ThesubjectandsubjectivityinPhilosophy84-87

3.1.1Thesubjectinphilosophy84-86

3.1.2Thesubjectivityinphilosophy86-87

3.2SubjectandSubjectivityinTranslation87-94

3.2.1Subjectintranslation87-91

3.2.2Subjectivityintranslation91-94

3.3Studythetranslator'ssubjectivityintheintersubjectiverelationship94-99

3.3.1Theintersubjectivitybetweenthetranslatorandtheauthor95-97

3.3.2Theintersubjectivitybetweenthetranslatorandthereader97-99

ChapterFour:TheEmbodimentsoftheTranslator'sSubjectivity99-121

4.1Thetranslator'ssubjectivityinthepreparationstageoftranslation99-104

4.1.1Translator'sresearchworkinthepreparationstageoftranslation99-102

4.1.2Translator'ssubjectivityinthechoiceofthetexts102-104

4.2TheTranslator'sSubjectivityintheTranslatingProcess104-117

4.2.1Translator'ssubjectivityintheunderstandingprocess104-108

4.2.2Translator'ssubjectivityintheproducingprocess108-117

4.3TheTranslator'sSubjectivityintheCulturalAwareness117-121

ChapterFive:RestrictionsontheTranslator'sSubjectivity121-130

5.1TheSourceText121-124

5.1.1Thetypeofthesourcetext121-124

5.1.2Thelanguageobstacles124

5.2Ideology124-126

5.3EthicValues126-128

5.4HistoricalandCulturalfactors128-130

ChapterSix:Conclusion130-132

References132-137

2.2.5Summary82-84

ChapterThree:ImplicationoftheSubjectivityoftheTranslation84-99

3.1ThesubjectandsubjectivityinPhilosophy84-87

3.1.1Thesubjectinphilosophy84-86

3.1.2Thesubjectivityinphilosophy86-87

3.2SubjectandSubjectivityinTranslation87-94

3.2.1Subjectintranslation87-91

3.2.2Subjectivityintranslation91-94

3.3Studythetranslator'ssubjectivityintheintersubjectiverelationship94-99