版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领
文档简介
CertificationofRotorcraftandFHAProcessAEAJanuary31,2012CertificationofRotorcraftanOUTLINECertificationProcessInstallationofComplexSystemsinNormalCategoryRotorcraftXX.1301&XX.1309ComparisonGuidanceMaterialCompliancewith27/29.1309SystemSafetyAssessmentItemstobeawareof…FHA/SSAQuestions2OUTLINECertificationProcess2CertificationProcessApplication(e.g.TC,ATC,STC,ASTC)CertificationBasisdefined.CertificationPlans:Detailhowcompliancewillbeshownforeachrule(27.1309analysis,groundtest,flighttest,etc.).DefinelevelofFAAinvolvement(delegation).Testplanning&execution.Data/TestReview:FAAreviews/witnessestestsasnecessary.TC/STCissued.3CertificationProcessApplicatiComplexSystemsinSmallRotorcraftSubjectequipmentAttitudeDirectionIndicatorSyntheticVisionAHRSi.e.MEMStechnologyAirDataNavigationHTAWSTrafficWeatherRADALTAutopilots/stabilityaugmentationSystemintegrationCertificationBasesthatrangefromCAR6topart27amndt.46IntendedFunctionWillitonlybeusedforDay/NightVFR?Single/DualPilotCATA/CATBFHA/SSAProperhazardsclassificationProperdesignlevels,includingsoftwareRequiresinputfromvariousengineeringdisciplinesandPilots4ComplexSystemsinSmallRotor14CFR2X.1301Comparison2X.1301:Eachitemofinstalledequipmentmust-Beofakindanddesignappropriatetoitsintendedfunction;BelabeledastoitsfunctionandoperationallimitationsBeinstalledaccordingtoitslimitationsFunctionproperlywheninstalled.Althoughtherule&itsapplicationarethesame,theyresultindifferentrequirementsduetotheplatform’sdesign&operationaldifferences.514CFR2X.1301Comparison2X.132X.1309Comparison2X.1309:Whiletherearesomedifferencesinthe14CFRParts23,25,27,29,ingeneral,theyallsaythateachitemshouldbesafeandreliableandnotadverselyaffectanyothersystem.Basically,thisistheregulationthatrequiresthathazardsposedbythesystemsinstalledonaircraftmustbeaddressedaspartofthecertificationprocess.RESOURCESAC27/29.1309SAEARP4754“GuidelinesforDevelopmentofCivilAircraftandSystems”.SAE
ARP4761"GuidelinesandMethodsforConductingtheSafetyAssessmentProcessonCivilAirborneSystemsandEquipment".OtherpublishedACGuidance(e.g.,21-40,27-1B,29-2B),FAAOrders,RTCADocuments.62X.1309Comparison2X.1309:Wh27.1309&29.1309ComparisonItisassumedthatthebasicPart27aircraftwillbecertifiedVFR.
27.1309onaVFRHelicopterdoesnotaddresssystemswhosefailureconditionsareassessedtobehigherthanmajor(i.e.hazardousorcatastrophic).Mayrequirespecialconditions
IftherotorcraftistobecertifiedforIFRflight,thenyoumustuse27appendix“B”whichinvokessomePart29rulesincludingportionsof29.1309.727.1309&29.1309ComparisonItGuidanceMaterialAC27.1B,27.1309providesguidanceforcompliancetoFAR27.1309AC29-2C,29.1309providesguidanceforcompliancetoFAR29.1309BothACsrecognizeSAE-ARP4761/4754SystemSafetyAssessment(SSA)processAC20-174forcompliancetothenewARP4754A.8GuidanceMaterialAC27.1B,27.Complianceto27/29.1309XX.1309ComplianceData:Qualitative&QuantitativeanalysisrequiredforCatastrophic,Hazardous,andforcomplexsystemsthathaveMajorfailureclassifications.FHA,PSSA,FTA,FMEA&CCArequired.MustSubstantiateprobabilityoffailurereqmts.OnlyQualitativeassessmentrequiredfornon-complexMajorandMinorsystems.Noprobabilityoffailuresubstantiationrequired.9Complianceto27/29.1309XX.130SafetyAssessmentProcessFunctionalHazardAssessment(FHA)AircraftLevel&SystemsLevelFHAsUsedtoIdentifyEffects(i.e.FailureConditionCategories)ofSystemFailuresonAircraft5FailureConditionCategoriesCatastrophicHazardous/Severe-MajorMajorMinorNo-Effect10SafetyAssessmentProcessFunctSystemSafetyAssessmenthardwarerequirementsCatastrophic-
<1x10-9probabilityofOccurrenceHazardous/Severe-Major-
<1x10-7Major-
<1x10-5Minor-
<1x10-3No-Effect-noprobabilityofoccurrencereqmts.AsdefinedinAC27/29.1309&SAE
ARP4761"GuidelinesandMethodsforConductingtheSafetyAssessmentProcessonCivilAirborneSystemsandEquipment".11SystemSafetyAssessmenthardwSystemSafetyAssessmentSoftware&AEHRequirementsRTCA/DO-178BSoftwareLevelandRTCA/DO-254AEHLevelCommensuratewithFailureConditionCategoryLevelA(Catastrophic)LevelB(Hazardous/Severe-Major)LevelC(Major)LevelD(Minor)LevelE(NoSafetyEffect)12SystemSafetyAssessmentSoftw
AssessingtheEffectsofFailuresIntegrationofCockpitDisplaySystemsandPilotInterfaceInadditiontothesystemsengineeringspecialists,bothflighttestandHFevaluationofpilot-systeminterfaceisusedtoevaluateandclassifythehazardlevelofaparticularfailurecondition.Especiallyifitinvolvesthepilot–systeminterface(controlormisrepresentationtothepilotofinformation)13
AssessingtheEffectsofFailIssuestobeawareof:FHAshouldnotbeaccomplishedaftersystemdesignandinstallation.
PrimarypurposeofFHAistosetdesignstandards;nottoappeaseFAA
Donotusetheequipmentreliabilitytodefinefailureclassification.
ThehighesthazardclassificationforequipmentthatisnotrequiredbycertificationoroperationalrulesNOTis“minor”.14Issuestobeawareof:FHAshouFHA/SSAquestionsforthegroupShouldthehazardclassification/threattotheaircraftandoroccupantschangeformisleadinginformationasafunctionof…ItsRequiredvs.non-requiredinCAR6/part27?Whatifitcanbeclassifiedas“safetyenhancing”equipment?ItsbeinginstalledtosatisfyandOperationalequipmentrequirementsi.e.(135)?15FHA/SSAquestionsforthegrDiscussionTime:BacktoKim…16DiscussionTime:BacktoKim…1QuestionstoindustryandtheFAA:
Dowe,theFAAandindustry,understandtherisktradeoffsifweallowtheinstallationofequipmentwithalowerlevelofcertitudethanourguidanceallows?GiventheuniquecharacteristicsofrotorcraftWhataretherisktradeoffsandwhatdotheybuyus?Dowegetanetgaininsafety(asreflectedbyloweraccidentnumbers)?Howarewediscouragingapplicantsandoperatorsfrominstallingsafetyenhancingequipmentthatisnotrequiredbyanyregulations?
Arewegoingtoexacerbatepoorpilotdecisionmakingbyprovidingasystemthatmayprovideafalsesenseofsecurity(i.e.“snowtiresyndrome”)17QuestionstoindustryandtheCertificationofRotorcraftandFHAProcessAEAJanuary31,2012CertificationofRotorcraftanOUTLINECertificationProcessInstallationofComplexSystemsinNormalCategoryRotorcraftXX.1301&XX.1309ComparisonGuidanceMaterialCompliancewith27/29.1309SystemSafetyAssessmentItemstobeawareof…FHA/SSAQuestions19OUTLINECertificationProcess2CertificationProcessApplication(e.g.TC,ATC,STC,ASTC)CertificationBasisdefined.CertificationPlans:Detailhowcompliancewillbeshownforeachrule(27.1309analysis,groundtest,flighttest,etc.).DefinelevelofFAAinvolvement(delegation).Testplanning&execution.Data/TestReview:FAAreviews/witnessestestsasnecessary.TC/STCissued.20CertificationProcessApplicatiComplexSystemsinSmallRotorcraftSubjectequipmentAttitudeDirectionIndicatorSyntheticVisionAHRSi.e.MEMStechnologyAirDataNavigationHTAWSTrafficWeatherRADALTAutopilots/stabilityaugmentationSystemintegrationCertificationBasesthatrangefromCAR6topart27amndt.46IntendedFunctionWillitonlybeusedforDay/NightVFR?Single/DualPilotCATA/CATBFHA/SSAProperhazardsclassificationProperdesignlevels,includingsoftwareRequiresinputfromvariousengineeringdisciplinesandPilots21ComplexSystemsinSmallRotor14CFR2X.1301Comparison2X.1301:Eachitemofinstalledequipmentmust-Beofakindanddesignappropriatetoitsintendedfunction;BelabeledastoitsfunctionandoperationallimitationsBeinstalledaccordingtoitslimitationsFunctionproperlywheninstalled.Althoughtherule&itsapplicationarethesame,theyresultindifferentrequirementsduetotheplatform’sdesign&operationaldifferences.2214CFR2X.1301Comparison2X.132X.1309Comparison2X.1309:Whiletherearesomedifferencesinthe14CFRParts23,25,27,29,ingeneral,theyallsaythateachitemshouldbesafeandreliableandnotadverselyaffectanyothersystem.Basically,thisistheregulationthatrequiresthathazardsposedbythesystemsinstalledonaircraftmustbeaddressedaspartofthecertificationprocess.RESOURCESAC27/29.1309SAEARP4754“GuidelinesforDevelopmentofCivilAircraftandSystems”.SAE
ARP4761"GuidelinesandMethodsforConductingtheSafetyAssessmentProcessonCivilAirborneSystemsandEquipment".OtherpublishedACGuidance(e.g.,21-40,27-1B,29-2B),FAAOrders,RTCADocuments.232X.1309Comparison2X.1309:Wh27.1309&29.1309ComparisonItisassumedthatthebasicPart27aircraftwillbecertifiedVFR.
27.1309onaVFRHelicopterdoesnotaddresssystemswhosefailureconditionsareassessedtobehigherthanmajor(i.e.hazardousorcatastrophic).Mayrequirespecialconditions
IftherotorcraftistobecertifiedforIFRflight,thenyoumustuse27appendix“B”whichinvokessomePart29rulesincludingportionsof29.1309.2427.1309&29.1309ComparisonItGuidanceMaterialAC27.1B,27.1309providesguidanceforcompliancetoFAR27.1309AC29-2C,29.1309providesguidanceforcompliancetoFAR29.1309BothACsrecognizeSAE-ARP4761/4754SystemSafetyAssessment(SSA)processAC20-174forcompliancetothenewARP4754A.25GuidanceMaterialAC27.1B,27.Complianceto27/29.1309XX.1309ComplianceData:Qualitative&QuantitativeanalysisrequiredforCatastrophic,Hazardous,andforcomplexsystemsthathaveMajorfailureclassifications.FHA,PSSA,FTA,FMEA&CCArequired.MustSubstantiateprobabilityoffailurereqmts.OnlyQualitativeassessmentrequiredfornon-complexMajorandMinorsystems.Noprobabilityoffailuresubstantiationrequired.26Complianceto27/29.1309XX.130SafetyAssessmentProcessFunctionalHazardAssessment(FHA)AircraftLevel&SystemsLevelFHAsUsedtoIdentifyEffects(i.e.FailureConditionCategories)ofSystemFailuresonAircraft5FailureConditionCategoriesCatastrophicHazardous/Severe-MajorMajorMinorNo-Effect27SafetyAssessmentProcessFunctSystemSafetyAssessmenthardwarerequirementsCatastrophic-
<1x10-9probabilityofOccurrenceHazardous/Severe-Major-
<1x10-7Major-
<1x10-5Minor-
<1x10-3No-Effect-noprobabilityofoccurrencereqmts.AsdefinedinAC27/29.1309&SAE
ARP4761"GuidelinesandMethodsforConductingtheSafetyAssessmentProcessonCivilAirborneSystemsandEquipment".28SystemSafetyAssessmenthardwSystemSafetyAssessmentSoftware&AEHRequirementsRTCA/DO-178BSoftwareLevelandRTCA/DO-254AEHLevelCommensuratewithFailureConditionCategoryLevelA(Catastrophic)LevelB(Hazardous/Severe-Major)LevelC(Major)LevelD(Minor)LevelE(NoSafetyEffect)29SystemSafetyAssessmentSoftw
AssessingtheEffectsofFailuresIntegrationofCockpitDisplaySystemsandPilotInterfaceInadditiontothesystemsengineeringspecialists,bothflighttestandHFevaluationofpilot-systeminterfaceisusedtoevaluateandclassifythehazardlevelofaparticularfailurecondition.Especiallyifitinvolvesthepilot–systeminterface(controlormisrepresentationtothepilotofinformation)30
AssessingtheEffectsofFailIssuestobeawareof:FHAshouldnotbeaccomplishedaftersystemdesignandinstallation.
PrimarypurposeofFHAistosetdesignstandards;nottoappeaseFAA
Donotusetheequipmentreli
温馨提示
- 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
- 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
- 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
- 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
- 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
- 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。
最新文档
- 关于编制铍铜合金项目可行性研究报告编制说明
- 汽车检测仪项目可行性研究报告
- 2025年摩托车大架项目可行性研究报告
- 2025年突发环境事件应急预案、环境风险评估报告(版)
- 2025加盟品牌转让合同
- 2025果园管理经营承包合同范本
- me培训计划及内容
- 家政服务培训参考计划范文5篇
- 500字家长会发言稿
- 电信局隔断工程协议
- 2024年房屋租赁补充协议参考模板(四篇)
- 妇科宫腔镜技术风险评估预案
- 2024年全国教育大会精神全文课件
- 宁夏银川市第一中学2025届数学高一上期末质量检测模拟试题含解析
- 广东省深圳市2023-2024学年三年级上学期英语期中试卷(含答案)
- 《4.3.1等比数列的概念》说课稿
- 2025年高考英语一轮复习 词性转换训练(含答案)
- 睡眠医学课件 睡眠呼吸暂停综合征
- 合肥长鑫存储在线测评题2024
- 山东省济南市2023-2024学年高一年级上册1月期末考试英语试题(含解析)
- 2024-2030年中国餐饮供应链行业经营效益及竞争格局分析报告
评论
0/150
提交评论