gre作文collection论点论据否定句

1、1. This editorial t .t.The editorial also s To support/justify these the author cites the t.t.Asfurthersupportfortheargument,theauthor1. This editorial t .t.The editorial also s To support/justify these the author cites the t.t.Asfurthersupportfortheargument,theauthorHowever, the s on a series of un

2、substantiated mptions, which render unconvincing as it stands;The editorial suffers from several problems, which render unconvincing as it stands/on several grounds;I am not t the mayors projection accurate;I find this argument specious on several grounds;For xx reasons, this evidence lends credibil

3、ity to the speakers argument.;based on this evidence, I find the be unjustified in several respects;Close scrutiny of each of these facts, however, t of them lend credible support to 的具体内容mendation2. Providesy no UnfairlyUnsubstantiatedFailstoDoesnotsarilyConcludestooLendsnosupporttotheargument Prov

4、eslittlein son theadditionalFailstoconsiderossibleexplanationsIt isJustifiablyProvideslittle Absentxmption时候用However,theownerfailstoprovideanyevidencetosupportthisYettheargumentprovidesnoevidencetosupportthisWithoutt.,it ishastyto drawsTheauthorfailstoprovideHowever,theauthorfailstoconsiderothertequ

5、ally Theauthorignoresahost of ossibleexplanationsHowever，theauthorprovidesnoevidencetosubstantiatethis However,thisisnotsarilytheLendsupportThusamountstoscantTothetheauthorsargumentwouldbeIneithereventcouldnotjustifiablyrelyonLendsupportThusamountstoscantTothetheauthorsargumentwouldbeIneithereventco

6、uldnotjustifiablyrelyonthemeret.TosupportThus the strength of the of . Depend on t the author does Tothetthisisthecase,thentheauthorsargumentisnotWithout ruling out siblescenario/alternativeexplanationsfortheresults,authorcannotconvinceme/justifiablyt Ruleout,assertion,takeEliminatingProvesnothingCa

7、stdoubt起承转合in the second place, in the third place, in the forth place, Finally, ofall,secondly,thirdly,To begin roblem with the argument t.Moreover, the Evenroblemwiththeargumentinvolves.Finally,in3. Insum/tosum,theargumentisunconvincingasitNotwell-supported.Aseriouspoormptionsand isthereforeFailst

8、osubstantiateTheauthorsxxissimplynotInsum,theeditorial son a potentiallyogy aswellasonaseriesof 4. tobolster it theauthor mustt.tobetterassessadditionally,demonstrate,morethoroughToconvincet.,theauthorwouldhaveto re Theauthor mustprovide clear t. nto oneor moreother Tostrengthentheargument,theauthor

9、wouldhavetoprovidemoreinformationTomaketheargumentmoreconvincing,theauthorneedtoprovidemoredetailed.,toTobolstertheargument,theauthormustprovidet.of TobetterassesstheargumentIwouldneedtoknowwhether,andifso4. theauthorhasnoevidencet the surveys respondents are ive of the overall group peopleTobettera

10、ssesstheargumentIwouldneedtoknowwhether,andifso4. theauthorhasnoevidencet the surveys respondents are ive of the overall group peoplewhose.Lackingsuchevidence,itist.istically , the survey must be shown to be efore I can accept s based upon Specifically, the responses must be accurate, and the respon

11、dents must be istically in number and ive of . Without evidence of the surveys reliability, it is sible drawany saboutt.Credibilityand 的度The author provides no t the surveys respondents are ive of the group of.lacking such evidence, it is t people inclined x are willing to respond to the n eople wer

12、e. In short, without better t survey is istically reliable the mayor cannot rely on it to draw any s about ofxx-letalone 点Axx% increase does not sarily mean/indicate a sufficient demand. Although xx% seemssignificant, the actual level of consumption might nevertheless be very low. The scenario sible

13、,lly inlackingThe term “many” is far to vague to allow for any s. If “many” amounts insignificantpercentageof .,thenthefindingisoflittleuseinsupportingthe.The reliability of the study rests on its istical egrity. The argument fails to indicate portion of the people surveyed actually responded; the s

14、maller this portion, the less reliable results. Nor does the argument indicate how many people were surveyed, or whether the wasive5. mendation further tAwouldcarrythesameresultsasB.Yetkeydifferen tB would would achieve goals by following A. In nthetwomightundermine Themere t. Isscant lacking the ev

15、idence A and B are relevantly similar, the author cannot convince me on the of 6. OtherHowever, the author overlooks oth rather to other factors, such as.ossible causes, such A might be attribute not to. In other words, without o account sibilities/without ruling out ossibilitiesthe author cannot ju

16、stifiably/convincingly/reasonably conclude with any t The mightbe explainedby aIn other words, without o account sibilities/without ruling out ossibilitiesthe author cannot justifiably/convincingly/reasonably conclude with any t The mightbe explainedby avariety ctors.Perhaps,orthoc,ergopropterThe me

17、re t the occurred before the decline does not suffice to t causedthedecline.Perhapsthetruecause The arguer only s t the two facts occurred at the same time, however, we all tnmerelya coincidence of two facts could not sufficiently demonstrate a causal relationship 10. NotsarilyapplytoThusthe nationw

18、idettheargumentcites amounttoscanttProfitmargin:利润率 Frequent:vt. Profitability is a function of both revenue and expense. Thus it is trestaurants costs of obtaining high-quality, healthful seafood, or of promoting the new might render it unprofitable despite its popularity. Without weighing revenue against expenses isprematurea