风险管理英文版

1、Risk Assessment Part 1: Assessment with existing control measuresABusiness:TURBINE SYSTEMSActivity (or area) being assessed:Dytel/Moore Vernon GaugesDepartment:DIMENSIONAL _PeopleRolls-Royce:8 Frequency/duration:8hs 3shftsDept. no.:2225 _affected:Others:0 Frequency/duration:N/A .Location: - PCF_BAss

2、essment ref. no.Date of assessment:31/03/04Assessor(s)/team:P.REEKGSTICKA 一S.SARGEANTqPeriodic reviews - maximum1 s Review2n Review3 Review4 Reviewintervals for activities with:Date: 31/03/05Date:Date:Date:Medium risk (but ALARP) - annuallyName: P.REEKName:Name:Name:Cow risk- three-yearlySigned:ESig

3、ned:Signed:G. H Signed:JDF Consequence (outcome)HazardHazardous eventForeseeable causeDetails of harmValueExisting controlProbabilityRisk(potential for harm)(what happens)(cause of hazardous event)1 to 5measures used1 to 51 to 25Example:Working at heightFall from ladderLoss of balanceBroken limbs3La

4、dder in good condition, at correct angle and tied off39 medium1Trapped Hand1Fixture closing on componentsUnsafe working practicesBroken fingers1Safe procedures,Machine integrated122Operation of machineRSIContinuous loading & unloading of componentsWrist & backache2Intermittent breaks363Visual impare

5、ment14Noise1Examining results on display screens1General factory noiseContinuous use of DSEFinish area extraction & machine noiseGradual deteration of eyesightGradual hearing impairment33DSE legislation, not a continuous processArea is ppe controlled & hearing protection must be worn22665Physical in

6、juryDropping of tooling fixturesunsafe working practicesBruises & abrasions, possible broken fingers1Operator training12Page 1F Consequence (outcome)HazardHazardous eventForeseeable causeDetails of harmValueExisting controlProbabilityRisk(potential for harm)(what happens)(cause of hazardous event)1

7、to 5measures used1 to 51 to 256Hand held tooling vibrationVibration white finger from moving partsContinuous use of air toolsVibration white finger2Annual monitoring OHD26Page 2hazards will be introc Also consider wheRe-assess actions will b(KProposed actions (risk reduction measures)LExpected risk

8、aftercompletion of actionsMPlanned action completion dateNActual completion datePI confirm that the proposed actions havebeen completed and that the expected risk reduction has been achievedConsequenceProbabilityRiskNameSignatureDateExample (continued):Use tower scaffold or hydraulic access platform

9、but remember toconsider additional hazards326 med1/1/200125/12/2000J. BloggsJoe Bloggs26/12/200012i3udeNoise reduction plan intheognessewrjsks to show how proposed e effective in reducing the risk.6 Better Hand tooling010I121Rolls-RoyceRisk Assessment Part 2:Assessment of risk reduction actionsConse

10、quencePeopleAssetsEnvironmentReputationMultiple fatalitiesExtensive damageSignificant harm*International impact5Single fatalityMajor damageModerate, long-term harm*National impact4Major injuryLocalised damageModerate, short-term harm*Considerable impact3Lost time injuryMinor damageLow impact, little

11、 harm*Limited Impact2ProbabilityIncredible Extremely unlikely to ever occurImprobable Unlikely but may occur exceptionallyOccasional Likely to occur some timeProbable Likely to occur oftenFrequent Regular or continuous occurrence12345RLead AssessorAccountable ManagerSignedName (print)PositionDatePag

12、e 3First aid injuryNo damageNo impact*No Impact1勿彩勿多* Refer to a Environmental Aspects and Impacts Assessment methodology and EnvAID user guide for explanation of environmental probability and consequence categories.Page 4Guidance on Completion of Risk Assessment FormBox/ColumnExplanation (for detai

13、led guidance refer to risk assessment guidance document)AProvide details of the activity being assessed and the business and department to which it relates. Where the risk assessment is generic it should be clearly stated.Indicate the people who could be affected (including contractors and the publi

14、c) and the frequency and duration of exposureprecise details are not required.BA unique reference number should be allocated to the assessment, and the date of the initial assessment and the main parties involved should be recorded.CHazard: The hazard is the thing with the potential for harm, such a

15、s a flammable substance, rotating machine or deep water. Record all of the significant hazards associated with the activity being assessed. Ignore any trivial hazard.The form provides space for listing six hazardous events (i.e. outcomes)if more are needed,continue on an additional sheet.Although th

16、e risk assessment matrix covers risks to people, assets, environment and reputation, each of these risk areas should be considered separately, e.g. consider environmental hazards independently.DHazardous Event: Give a very brief description of the hazard scenario or event i.e. what happens that coul

17、d lead to harm.EForeseeable cause: Record the plausible causes of each hazard being released or the foreseeable causes of exposure to the hazards.E.g. how the substance is released, how a person becomes trapped in a dangerous machine, how a person comes into contact with deep water.FConsequence:This

18、 column is divided into two parts. The first gives brief details of theoutcome of the hazardous event, whilst the second part records the value associated with the harm, taken from the risk matrix. Clearly the description of the harm should relate to the appropriate category in the matrix.First aid

19、injury : local first aid treatment received but no significant lost time.Lost time injury : off-site medical treatment or short-term lost time (e.g. days).Major injury : immediate major trauma long-term lost time (e.g. weeks)It is important to be realistic is considering consequence, and although un

20、likely events should be considered, they should nevertheless be plausible. Note that if there is more than one plausible outcome from a hazardous event, each will need to be considered separately.Taken together, columns C to F should provide an understanding of the hazardous event being considered.G

21、Existing Control Measures:The presence of any existing control measures may reduce boththe probability of an incident occurring and the scale of the consequences,and should berecorded to ensure that they are taken into account by the risk assessment and not overlooked.This record of control measures

22、 will also be useful when preparing a written safe system of work, which should draw from the risk assessment.Any control measures specified should be those that are actually used, and should be adequate for the purpose and regularly reviewed to ensure that they continue to be maintained as effectiv

23、e controls. If there is doubt about the genuine usage oreffectiveness of a controlmeasure it should not be included as a risk reduction measure.HProbability:Using judgement based on experience and historical evidence, estimate theprobability of each hazardous event occurring using the categories giv

24、en in the risk matrix. In considering the probability account should be taken of the control measures that are in place providing that they are genuinely used and of benefit.If in doubt about which category to select, err on the side of caution. Further guidance on thePage 5selection of probability

25、categories relates to the assessment teamsexperience, as followIncredible : No one in the team/workgroup has heard of this occurring in the industry.Improbable : One person in the team/workgroup knows of someone who has experienced this.Occasional : One person in the team/workgroup has experienced t

26、his at least once in the last two years.Probable : All persons in the team/workgroup experience this at least once a year.Frequent : All persons in the team/workgroup experience this more often than not when doing this activity.vsJRisk:The value of risk is determined by combining (multiplying) the v

27、alues sexed forconsequence and probability for a given hazardous event. The risk matrix facilitates this and results in one of three risk categories being selected, i.e. High, Medium or Low.KProposed Actions: The tolerability of the risk assessed in column H will determine whether further actions ar

28、e required for risk reduction.High risks cannot be tolerated under any circumstances andwill require immediate action toreduce the level of risk to asow as reasonably practicable If necessary this may require temporary suspension of an activity or the installation of temporary control measures.Mediu

29、m risks - judgement will need to be made on the urgency of further action to reduce the risk to a level that is as low as reasonably practicable! specifyin g .actions for further controlmeasures, consider both immediate (interim) actions and long-term (permanent) solutions.Low risks are broadly tole

30、rable but should be kept under review and reduced further wherever reasonably practicable. However the principle of continuous improvement should be employed to continue to drive down risk where economically valid.In deciding what action to take to reduce risks a hierarchical approach should be take

31、n, furtherdetails of which are given in Section 2.3.3 of the main document.LExpected risk after completion of actions: Once actions have been selected the risks should be reassessed to ensure that the required risk reduction will be achieved, i.e. that the revised level of risk is tolerable. If it i

32、s not, alternative or additional actions will be required.Note that actions intended to reduce risks may also introduce further hazards and therefore risks it is therefore important to consider any additional hazards in the reassessment.MPlanned action completion date: When a satisfactory means of r

33、isk reduction has been determined through appropriate actions, it is important that they are actually carried out to an acceptable timescale. The planned completion date will need to be carefully considered, and if the activity is allowed to proceed in the meantime, additional precautions may need t

34、o be put in place temporarily.N/PActual completion date and confirmation of completion:When a risk reduction action hasbeen completed, the date should be recorded and the action signed-off. This is an important part of the process as any actions not enforced will render the risk assessment useless.

35、The sign-off will also provide an auditable record.If the initial risk assessment fora given hazard has concluded that no additional actions arenecessary, columns L, M, N and P will not need to be completed. Temporary control measures need to be in place before the activity begins.QPeriodic reviews:

36、The completed risk assessment should be reviewed periodically to ensurethat it remains up-to-date and relevant to the activity.Maximum intervals for review relates to the level of residual risk associatedwith the activity,and are as follows:Medium Risk (which have been justified as ALARP)annuallyLow

37、 Risk every 3 years.Clearly high risks are not tolerable and so activities will not have a high residual risk.In addition to periodic reviews, risk assessments should be revisited:whenever significant changes in circumstances occur (including changes to thePage 6operation of the activity or in light

38、 of new legislation and other requirements); following any incident.RSign-off: On completion of the risk assessment the form should be signed-off by the assessor and by the manager who is accountable for the working activity or area which has been assessed. Sign-off may be before box P is signed to verify that actions have been completed.Indicate if any o