版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领
文档简介
1、Argument时序性因果攻击Firstly,theauthorisengagedin'afterthis,therefore,becauseofthisreasoning.ThelineofreasoningisthatbecauseAhappenedbeforeB,theformercausedthelatter.However,thisreasoningisfallaciousunlessotherpossiblecausalfactorshavebeenconsideredandruledout.Forexample,perhapsC.Asaresult,anydecision
2、aimedataddressingtheproblemofBmustbebasedonamorethoroughinvestigationtogatherdatainordertonarrowdownandlocatetheactualcauseofB.同时性因果攻击Secondly,theauthor'ssolutionrestsontheassumptionthatAisthecauseofBjustbecauseAcoincidedwithB.However,amerepositionalcorrelationdoesnotnecessarilyproveacausalrelat
3、ionship.Inaddition,allotherprospectivecausesofB,suchasCandD,mustberuledout.WithoutdetailedanalysisoftherealsourceofB,itwouldbegroundlesstoattributeBtoA.错误类比攻击Additionally,itishighlydoubtfulthatstrategiesdrawnfromAareapplicabletoB.However,differencesbetweenthesetwoclearlyoutweighthesimilarities,there
4、foremakingtheanalogymuchlessvalid.Forexample,CandDallaffectAbutvirtuallyabsentinB.Accordingly,wecanseethatAandBaresodissimilarthatBisunlikelytoexperiencethesameconsequenceifitadoptsAsstrategies.4.止匕即彼攻击Lastbutnotleast,theauthorunfairlyassumesthatareadermustmakeaeither-orchoice.However,theargumentfai
5、lstoruleoutpossibilitythatadjustingAandBmightproducebetterresults.Moreover,iftheauthoriswrongintheassumptionthatAandBaretheonlycausesoftheproblem,thusthemosteffectivesolutionmightincludeacomplexofotherfactorssuchasCandD.Inanyevent,theauthorprovidesnojustificationforthemutuallyexclusivechoiceimposedo
6、nthereader.必要性攻击Inthefirstplace,theauthorunfairlyassumesthatBwasdeterminedsolelybyA.WhileAisaseeminglyimportantelementindeterminingB,itishardlytheonlyorevennecessarilyrequiredelement.ThisassumptionoverlooksothercrucialcriteriaindeterminingBsuchasC,D.Withoutaccountingforthesepotentialfactors,theautho
7、rconcludestoohastilythatisthebestwaytoachievegoals.充分性攻击Inthesecondplace,_theauthor'ssolutionrestsontheassumptionthatAissufficienttogivebirthtothedesiredgoals.However,ifitturnsoutthatBisduetoacombinationoffactors,someofwhichwillremainunchangedinthefuture,suchasCandD,onlyAmighthavenoimpactonB.选择性
8、样本攻击Athresholdproblemisthattheauthorprovidesnoevidencetoclaimthatthegeneralgroupasawholeisofthesamecharacteristic.Theexamplecited,whilesuggestiveofthistrend,isinsufficienttowarrantthatthesampleisrepresentativeofthewholegroup.Forexample,Iquestionthat-Therefore,suchevidencewouldbeobviouslyunrepresenta
9、tive.Infact,infaceofsuchlimitedevidence,itisfallaciousfortheauthortodrawanyconclusionatall.(与选择性样本攻击”较类似)样本代表性攻击Moreover,apossiblemethodologyproblemintheargumentisthatitisofbias.Theterm'somany'istoovaguetobestatisticallymeaningful.Itisverypossiblethatworkerswhoweremoreinterestedinthesurveymi
10、ghtbelikelytorespondtothequestionnaire.Lackingintheinformationaboutthenumberofworkerssurveyedandthenumberofrespondents,itisimpossibletoassessthevalidityofthesurvey.Forinstance,if1000workersweresurveyedbutonly10responded,theresultshouldbehighlysuspect.Becausetheauthorfailstoaccountforotherinterpretat
11、ions,thesurveywouldbeuselessinconcludingthat.其他理由忽略他因攻击Thirdly,theauthorhasfocusedonlyonA.Amoredetailedanalysiswouldrevealthatotherfactorsfaroutweighthefactoronwhichtheauthorfocuses.Forexample,C.Lackingamorecomprehensiveanalysisofthecauses,itispresumptuousfortheauthortoclaimthatAsolelydeterminedB.因果
12、倒置攻击Atlast,itispossiblethattheauthorhasconfusedcausewitheffect.PerhapsAwasaresponsetoB.Sincetheauthorfailstoaccountforthispossibility,theclaimthatiscompletelyunwarranted样本数量攻击Anotherproblemthatseriouslyweakensthelogicofthisargumentisthatthesurveycitedisbasedontoosmallasampletobereliable.Offeredinsup
13、portoftheargument,theonlyevidenceisthatUnlessitcanbeshownthatthesampleistypicalofallgeneralgroup,thefactthatisgroundlesstoclaimthatLoadedquestion和诚实性攻击What'smore,themethodologyofthesurveyisproblematicfortworeasons.Foronething,wearenotinformedwhetherthesurveyprovidedonly3alternatives.Ifitdid,ther
14、espondents,whomightverywellpreferanotherchoicenotprovidedinthesurvey,mightbeforcedtogiveuptheirpreferences.Foranotherthing,wearenotinformedwhetherthesurveyresponseswereanonymousorconfidential.Therespondentsmightsupplyresponsesfavoredbytheirsuperiorswhomightconductthesurvey.Botheventswouldleadthissur
15、veyunreliable,letalonedrawtheconclusionthat样本时效性攻击Lastbutnotleast,anotherflawthatsignificantlyunderminesthisargumentisthattheauthorneglectstoindicatehowrecentlythesurveywasactuallyconducted.Whenusedtogenerallyclaimaparticulargroup,thesamplesshouldbecloseenoughtosupportthegeneralization,inordertoprev
16、enthistoricalchangesfrominvalidatingthegeneralization.Allweknowisthatthesurveyisrecentlypublished.Thelessrecentthesurveyitself,thelessreliabletheresultstodemonstratethat差异概念攻击Tobeginwith,wemustestablishthemeaningofthevagueconceptA.IfthetermweresynonymouswithB,theevidencecitedwouldstronglysupportthea
17、rgument.However,AmaybedefinedinothertermssuchasCandD.Accordingly,theauthorhasdrawntheconclusiontoohastilyduetotheignoranceofotherdefinitionsofA.范围内推攻击What'smore,themostegregiousreasoningerrorinthisargumentisthattheauthorusesevidencepertainingtoageneralgrouponthebasisofaparticularB.Evenifthereaso
18、ningmaybesoundingeneralsense,theparticularsituationinwhichBisinvolvedmaynotberepresentativeoftheentiregeneralgroup.Itispossiblethat.Ifthisisthecase,theclaimthatisillfounded.不随时变攻击Moreover,theauthorunfairlyassumesthatAwillremainunchangedoverthenextdecades.However,amererecentone-yearAisinsufficienttoc
19、laimthat.Statisticsfromsuchlimitedanecdotalevidenceisnotagoodindicatorforthistrend.Inaddition,itispossiblethatinthefuture,thistrendwouldgreatlyfluctuateorevenreverse,thentheadoptionoftheauthor'sproposalmightgivebirthtoB,however,itmightalsohaveanegativeimpactonC1and,inturns,C2.Admittedly,thisargu
20、mentwouldbeevenweakerandweakereachdayastimegoesby.Issue把题目复述一下?Tosomeextent,Iagreewiththeauthor'sgeneralassertionthatif*(即在作者的观点上,加上一些条件,有保留地赞同).However,theauthorunnecessarilyextendsthisbroadassertiontoanirreversibleextremewhileoverlooksothercompellingfactorsthatmayaffectthisissue.Onbalance,mypo
21、intsofagreementandcontentionwiththeauthorinvolvethefundamentalanddeepanalysisasdiscussedbelow.Ontheonehand,Iwouldliketoadmitthatthisstatement,althoughsuffersfromsomeobviousdrawbacks,hassomemeritsprimarilyinsomespecialcasesinwhichtheimplicitrationalebehinditaccordswithcommonsenseandourexperienceindai
22、lylife.Hence,itispartiallyindisputable.Afterall,.Evenif,Inotherwords.Furthermore,.Alltheseevidencedemonstratesbeyondanydoubtthat.(以上两段要找两个理由,来说明作者观点如何对)Ontheotherhand,recognizingthatamoreapplicablechoicemustincorporatedifferentaspectsoftheissueassufficientaspossible,Ihavetopointoutthattheauthorovers
23、tates'scomparativesignificance,andfailtotakeintoaccountotheressentialfactors.Inshort,thisassertionisproblematicintwoaspects.ThefirstargumenttheonethatIthinkthemostcompellingisthattheauthoroverlooked,thatistosay,.Thesecondargumentitmighthavebeennoticedbyothers-isthatinsomeoccasion,itisquitediffic
24、ultto.Accordingly,Itendtoconcedethatwhenitcomestosomecertaincircumstancesitispartiallyappropriate(这里找两个理由说明在一些场合下,作者观点还是不成立的,因为不管什么论点,成立还是会有条件的。此段模版字数已经很多,你只要列出不成立的观点即可,言简意赅,因为一般到这个时候,时间也不多了,容不得你写例子了。)Inconclusion,issueofisacomplexone,requiringsubjectivejudgment,consequently,therearenoeasyorcertaina
25、nswers.Sodifferentarethepersonalexperiencesandemotionalconcernsamongpeoplewithdiverseculturethatthousandindividualsmightholdthousandopinions.Accordingtome,把你开头的观copy/paste上去.GMATReading1.4种文章类型一、新老观点对比(重点在后)先是老观点:many,most,common,frequently,usually,traditionally,once,old,recently,untilrecently再是新观点:
26、强转折(1段中/2段首)主题句:明确的新观点。二、现象解释型(重点在后)-为什么?先是现象:自然科学:自然现象社会科学:史实再是解释:解释原因+提出多个理论+强调主体+评价主题句:正确的解释三、问题解决型:(重点在后)-该怎么去做?问题:疑问question,puzzle任务difficulty,task,problem,challenge解决/回答:多个理论+提出主题+作者评价。主题句:正确的解决方案/答案四、结论解释型(开门见山)-有哪些内容特点:判断句-主题句恰恰是判断句;解释:内容的详细展开2.主题题型一、对文章的中心思想、写作目的等提问的题目1 .明确主题句TS2 .无TS-关键词、
27、细节、新内容A.关键词:主体动词Presentation:present,describe,explain,illustrate,pointout,etc.Argumentation:evaluate,criticize,refute,challenge,counter,correct,etc.(非常实用)3 .含作者态度(少数服从多数)二、结构套路1. organization:既问文章/段落的结构、套路,注意顺序!2. 特别套路:专门评述某人理论、著作,多属于结构解释型,少属于现象解释(为什么)。3. 注意:A. 先入为主型(从前不从后):前面部分结构已经很完整,但后面部分说了一大段和前面
28、无关的离题内容,不能受后面影响B. 少数服从多数(从大不从小):TS提出正态度,却在末尾作出转折说一些缺点、毛病,只是为了避免极端而作出的暖和语气。3. 态度题就作者对某事件、某理论的态度评价提问的题目。一边倒评价:正评价、负评价混合评价:大正小负、大负小正文中判断评价的依据:判断句系动词、情态动词、自由褒贬词(adj,adv)1 、引号:负评价2、表示评价的实义动词:主要用于研究类文章(1)负评价:fail(to),ignore,overlook,neglect,忽略,忽视,前一个为主观,后两个为客观overestimate,underestimate,高估,低估exaggerate,夸张,
29、夸大misrepresent,misinterpret错误表达,错误表述,错误解释(2)正评价:show,prove,demonstrate证明find,discover,发现determine,confirm,确信,确认3、让步语气让步语气的三种写法:前半句(1)itistrue/itiscorrect/ofcourse(2)nodoubt/withoutdoubt/undoubtedly(3)do/may/seem/appear后半句:强转折以后半句为主要评价。4、从大不从小文章开头或主题句中的评价是大评价,其他是小评价。让步和转折除外。4. 细节题1、 四种主要类型1. 罗马数字题2.i
30、norderto题型3.强对比取非题4.其他2、 几种常见的错误方式3、 细节定位(1)有定位的信息题:of,about,concerning,regarding-"关于"同义变换(2)无定位的信息题:只能根据对全文的整体把握来逐个判断选项。5. 类比题典型问法:whichofthefollowingismostsimilartothesituationinthesentence?Similarto,analogousto,parallel做法:抓住本质特征客观题做题要求:题型、定位、同义变换做题注意事项1、 4种错误选项:混、偏、反、无混:张冠李戴:A说成B;偏:以偏盖全
31、;反:与原文相反;无:原文没说/无法判断2、 慎重对待含有最高级、唯一性和比较句的选项3、 不要用非出题段落的内容来解答这个题例外:问某段结尾,可用下段开头;问某段开头,可用上段结尾。4、 长选项竖读法纵向比较所有选项,尤其是开头,找到其中相同的语言部分,如果某几个选项中相同的语言部分对这个题有用,那么先看这几个选项或者这几个选项的差异部分。5、文字定位基本操作:读文章的时候找出主题词和评价;文:主题题干:主题特殊情况:(1)如果题干主题在文中多处出现,一般定位在其首次出现之处。(2)如果题干主题与文章主题有关,定位在主题句。6. 逻辑题:(反对+支持题)(1)反对题:weaken,under
32、mine,callintoquestion,castdoubton4种作法:A 、反对原因B 、反证法C、直接反对结论D 、存在其他原因反对A-B时可说A不成立。假设结论成立,推出矛盾、谬误,与现实不符的情况。欲反对A-B,直接说B不成立。欲反对A-B,可说C-B。2)支持题:support,strengthen3种作法:A、补充所缺的条件。欲支持A-B,补上C,得C-A-B。B、把B再强调一遍。C、具体事例法:举文中没有讲过的例子作为正面论据。( 3) IFTRUE原则:不要怀疑5个选项的成立性,一切以他们的成立为前提。7. 出题点一、总结1. 主题:几乎必考;2.混合评价;3.强对比;4.强因果;5.比较句;6
温馨提示
- 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
- 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
- 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
- 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
- 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
- 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。
最新文档
- 2024年保险代理合同:某保险公司将保险代理业务委托给某代理公司
- 2024年审计师聘请合同
- 企业合同违约赔偿协议书
- 2024年视觉传感器项目综合评估报告
- 2024年特色风味及小吃服务项目评价分析报告
- 销售人员的聘用合同
- 2024至2030年中国轻钢龙骨吊件数据监测研究报告
- 2024至2030年中国自动调相水性印刷开槽机行业投资前景及策略咨询研究报告
- 2024至2030年电磁烘缸项目投资价值分析报告
- 2024年艾迪注射液项目可行性研究报告
- 印刷排版岗位招聘笔试题与参考答案(某大型央企)2025年
- 院前急救与院内急诊有效衔接工作制度
- 【餐饮店铺管理系统设计与实现(论文)15000字】
- 陕煤集团笔试题库及答案
- 33 《鱼我所欲也》对比阅读-2024-2025中考语文文言文阅读专项训练(含答案)
- (正式版)HGT 22820-2024 化工安全仪表系统工程设计规范
- (高清版)TDT 1075-2023 光伏发电站工程项目用地控制指标
- 《中华民族共同体概论》考试复习题库(含答案)
- 2022-2023学年武汉市江岸区七年级英语上学期期中质量检测卷附答案
- 加油机故障描述讲解
- 邓稼先的故事[共1页]
评论
0/150
提交评论