Publish-or-Perish批改网提交作文汇总版

1、Pub1ish-or-Perish批改网提交作文汇总版PubIishedorPerish?RecentIy,manyuniversitiesrequireeachgraduatestudenttohaveatleastonepaperpubIishedbeforegettingthemaster'sdegree,whichisconsideredasagoodwaytoevaIuatetheirstudents.Tomyopinion,IstronglysupportthiswayofevaIuatingandhopeitcouldbemoreacceptabIe.Foronethin

2、g,paperpubIishingisareflectionandalsoastandardofstudents1academicperformanceandsociaIcapabiIities.TheschooIcanweighthowexce11entstudents1academicabilitiesareandhowistheperformanceofexecutionandcommunicationkeptbythestudentsbyusingthisway.ItcanbeatypicaInewandeffectivewayforschooltoseIecttaIentedpers

3、onbesidesthetraditionalway.Foranother,italsobenefitstudents.Theycangetanadditionalwaytoprovetheirabilitiesbypaperpublishing,itisgoodforthosestudentswhoarenotgoodatexaminationsbutresearchandexecution.What1smore,bythisrequirement,undergraduatestudentscanhaveanopportunitytobepreparedforthelearningproce

4、ssandpatternofgraduateschooLFromtheforegoing,wecaneasilydrawaconclusionthatitisbeneficialforuniversitiestorequiretheirstudentstohaveatleastonepaperpubIishedbeforegettingthemaster1sdegree.UniversitiescanhaveawiderandmorecomprehensivewaytoevaIuatetheirstudents.Therefore,theundergraduatestudentswhowant

5、highereducationshouIdpracticeandbepreparedfortheirfuture.PubIishorPerishItiswell-knownthatChinesehavemadegreatprogressinsciencesincethefoundingofnewChina,anditisnoexaggerationtosaythatweareleadersinsomerealm.Ofcourse,itistheachievementofthousandsofhard-workingscientists.However,Idonotagreewiththeval

6、uesystem'PubIishorPerish'.Tobeginwith,therearesomecompetitionsinscience,especiallyinsomeresearchhot-spots,suchasthebiotechnoIogy.Sometimes,wemayfindsomepapersareidenticalwithourresearchesinhand.Actua11y,wefindthesameresultsjustseveraldayslater.Unfortunately,wecouldnotpubIishitagainandwehavew

7、astedalIthetime,energyandmoney.InordertopubIishacertainnumberofpaperseveryyear,scientistsmustworkharddayandnight,therefore,theyhavenotimetodophysicaIexercises.Ithasbeenprovedthatscientistsareusuallynotingoodphysicalconditions.RecentIy,tosurvive,somescientistshavetoplagiarizeother'sideasorfabrica

8、tetestdata.Plagiarismisnotonlyharmfultoouracademiabutalsodetrimentaltooursociety.Graduatestudent,primarilyinterestedinacademicandscience,areexpectedtohaveatleastonepaperpubIishedthanthosewhograduatedtenyearsago,andfarmoreconcernedwiththeproblemsofresearch.Firstly,pubIicationisoneofthefewmethodsatast

9、udents*disposaItodemonstratetheiracademiccapabiIitiesfandtheattentionthatpubIicationsbringtoscholarsandtheirsponsoringinstitutionscanfaciIitateprogressthroughthefieldandcontinuedfunding.StudentswhoneverpubIishedorwhofocusonactivitieswhichdonotresultinpubIicationssuchasundergraduates,mayfindthemselve

10、soutofcontentionforavaiIabletenure-trackpositions.SecondIy,Research-orienteduniversitiesmayattempttomanagetheunhealthyaspectsofthepubIish-or-perishpractices>buttheiradministratorsoftenarguethatsomepressuretoproducecutting-edgeresearchisnecessarytomotivatestudentsearlyintheircareerstofocusonresear

11、chadvancement,andlearntobaIanceitsachievementwiththeotherresponsibiIitiesoftheprofessorialrole.Finally,inordertopublish,graduatestudentswiIIreadmoreandmoreacademicIiteratureandacquireoftheexperienceofpubIishing.Thus,IbeIievethatitcanmakegreatcontributiontousandimprovescientificresearchabiIity.Inawor

12、d,'PublishorPerish'isnotsuitableforscientists.PubIishorPerishNowadays,itiswe11-knownthatChinesegraduatestudenthavemadeagreatprogressinscience,especially,insomeresearchhotspots,suchaspubIishedpaper.BecausefrequentpubIicationisoneofafewmethodsatscholars,disposaltodemonstrateacademictalent.Howe

13、ver,thereareadvantagesanddisadvantagesaboutit.Cutting-edgeresearchisnecessarytomotivategraduatestudentorscholarsearlyintheircareerstofocusonresearchadvancement,andlearntobalanceitsachievementwiththeotherresponsibiIitiesoftheprofessorialrole.GraduatestudentatmostChinesemainlanduniversitiesarerequired

14、todoresearchandpubIisharticlesjustastheircolleaguesorclassmatesdoinothercountries.ButinChina,gettingthemaster'sdegreedependslargelyononething:ThenumberofresearchpapersheorshemanagestopubIish.Theoretically,ifmorepapersarepubIished,thechancethatthesepapersarecitedbyothers,wiIIbegreater.Theonlyreas

15、ontoexplainwhat'shappeninginChinanowisthatthequaIityofthosepapersareextremelylow.AndthepressuretopubIish-or-perishalsodetractsfromthetimeandeffortgraduatestudentcandevotetotheirresearch.IpersonallyholdthepointofviewthatthepressuretopubIishhasbeencitedasacauseofpoorworkbeingsubmittedtoacademicjournals.Infact,failuretopubIishresearchresultsisbyfarthemostcommonandworryingformofscientificandethicaImisconductinresearch.Theonlyreasontoexplainwhat1shappeninginChinanowisthatthequaIityofthosepapersisextremelylow.AndthepressuretopubIish-or-peris