合作课题与NIH申请书的书写_第1页
合作课题与NIH申请书的书写_第2页
合作课题与NIH申请书的书写_第3页
合作课题与NIH申请书的书写_第4页
合作课题与NIH申请书的书写_第5页
已阅读5页,还剩6页未读 继续免费阅读

下载本文档

版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领

文档简介

1、 课题分担:课题承担量大,需多实验室合作; 研究资源互补:人力资源、现场资源或动物资源优势与技术资源互补; 研究能力互补:细胞学、分子生物学、新型技术与实验方法significance: the cipra cohort offers a unique population infected at about the same time with a uniform hiv strain. determining immunologic parameters that differentiate progression of disease from non-progression can b

2、e quite significant.approach: this application from a group of investigators in china aims to evaluate two cohorts of hiv infected patients from the cipra project to determine functionality of cd8 epitope-specific immune responses during hiv-1 infection and correlate these with progression or contai

3、nment of hiv replication. this cohort contains patients who were infected with hiv about 10 years ago through contaminated blood products. all were infected by the thailand b virus.innovation: the study of cd8 responses to specific viral epitopes and correlation with treg function in progressor vs.

4、non-progressor populations is innovative.grant application: five components from each reviewerinvestigators: the pi, dr. xu, is experienced in hiv immunology research. his research team has relevant experience in biostatistics and molecular virology; however, the responsibilities of each team member

5、 are not described. environment: the pis laboratory is well equipped to carry out the proposed work. clinical resources critical to the project are demonstrated in the preliminary data, but apparently are quite distant from the laboratory, requiring delivery of specimens by aircraft, which may be pr

6、oblematic.five components from each reviewerinnovation: the study of cd8 responses to specific viral epitopes and correlation with treg function in progressor vs. non-progressor populations is innovative.innovation: the proposed project will address a critical barrier to progress in the field. after

7、 more than 20 years we still do not completely understand the immunopathogenesis of hiv infection. it is thought that information gained by comparing immune, viral, and genetic differences between progressors andlong-term non-progressors will be useful in defining the hosts response to hiv infection

8、 which is crucial for the development of an hiv vaccine. the proposed studies will expand the breadth of research support and advance the development of local scientific expertise in beijing as well as provide supportfor new chinese investigators.innovation: the level of innovation is low; the proje

9、ct proposes to use established techniques, although these are state-of-the-art in hiv immunology and appropriate for the research objectives.different comments from different reviewers for the identical applicationinvestigators: the pi, dr. xu, is experienced in hiv immunology research. his research

10、 team has relevant experience in biostatistics and molecular virology; however, the responsibilities of each team member are not described. investigators: the investigators are appropriately trained and well suited to conduct this research. dr. jianqing xu was trained at the research institute for g

11、enetic and human therapy in washington, d.c., from 1997-2004 and has a number of publications from this training. it appears that dr. xu has beenable to transfer much of this technology to the chinese cdc in beijing.environment: the pis laboratory is well equipped to carry out the proposed work. cli

12、nical resources critical to the project are demonstrated in the preliminary data, but apparently are quite distant from the laboratory, requiring delivery of specimens by aircraft, which may be problematic.environment: the pi and collaborating team has a strong track record and the use of the cipra

13、cohort for several years makes for an excellent environment for these studies. facilities are adequate.different comments from different reviewers for the identical applicationthe following resume sections were prepared by the scientific review administrator to summarize the outcome of discussions o

14、f the review committee on the following issues:protection of human subjects (resume): acceptable (30). informed consent seems adequate; privacy protection is in place; options for treatment are well defined. however, the study procedures and potential risks are not described. the text should also ad

15、dress plans to “collect additional blood if necessary”.inclusion of women plan (resume): acceptable (g1a). however, the specifics related to recruitment of women are lacking.inclusion of minorities plan (resume): acceptable (m5a). however, the specifics related to recruitment of minorities are lacki

16、ng.inclusion of children plan (resume): acceptable (c1a).biohazard comment: protection against blood-borne pathogens should be addressed.foreign institution: the proposed project utilizes a unique subject cohort at the foreign location, and supports the activities of local researcherscommittee budge

17、t recommendations: the budget was recommended as requested. 核心思维:目的明确,假说有力 面面俱到:含所有的必需元件 路标意识:研究思路清晰具体,具有可操作性 初次相见:简略介绍相关背景significance: the significance of this research must be given the highest possible rating. approach: taken together, these proposed studies are to put it mildly rather ambitious

18、. the proposal lacks critical detail, focus and interpretive precision needed to precisely define what comparisons are to be made. innovation: most of the data are descriptive, however, they have the potential to lead to highly relevant and important issues in hiv immunopathogenesis. investigator: one concern is the fact that dr. xxxx will devote only 10% of his time to this expansive project. dr. yyy is still relatively inexperienced in guidance of such a complex project, and dr. xxxs scientific guidance will likely be nee

温馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
  • 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
  • 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
  • 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
  • 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

评论

0/150

提交评论