版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领
文档简介
1、JCR Consuming Experiential Categories 主讲人:谢萍 2014.12.12 Contents 目录 Authors Introduction Study1-6 General discussion Author Anuj K. Shah The University of Chicago Booth School of business Decision making when resources are scare Adam L. Alter New York Universitys Stern School of Business on judgment
2、 and decision-making 0101 Anuj K. Shah Adam L. Alter Introduction 0202 BucketL Riding an elephant Holding a baby white tiger, Visiting Iguazu Falls, Floating in the Dead Sea Two categories Being around animals seeing bodies of water How consumers focus on experiential categories when making d
3、ecisions Theoretical Background0303 Previous research Heighten positive Dampen negative Maximize enjoyment by spreading out good events over time minimize displeasure , while clustering negative events together Event level Category level Determining how they should consume it Considering how a parti
4、cular event represents a broader class of experiences. Hypothesis H1 H2 People will eliminate categories quickly when facing negative experiences, but will preserve categories for positive experiences for as long as possible. Eliminating categories will create a greater sense of progress than preser
5、ving categories will. Studies 0404 2021-7-17 Consider: CCC C Imagine: Decide: Eliminates Category Preserves category Paradigm Study 1a travel scenario: trips to Ecuador2/3 VS trips to Peru1/3 Food scenario : pies 4/5VS cakes1/5 Social scenario: spending time with friend Al 2/3VS Betty1/3 Music scena
6、rio: identical to the rock3/4/jazz1/4 example above Scenarios Positive frame or Negative frame Each participant made choices across two frame Decide : eliminating a category or to preserving both categories Method Results Between subjects Within subjects Conducted a between-subjects analysis focusin
7、g only on the first scenario participants saw Eliminate categories when considering negative experiences (51%) than positive experiences (33%) Preserve categories in the positively framed scenario and to eliminate categories in the negatively framed scenario 41% Preserved positive and negative categ
8、ories 26% Eliminated positive and negative categories18% Eliminated positive categories and preserved negative categories16% Study 1b Random For example : BostonChicago Los Angeles Miami Barcelona BerlinParisRome USA Europe New York Zurich categories: BostonChicago Los Angeles Miami Barcelona Berlin
9、ParisRome New York Zurich Study 2 Priming : Participants were first asked to draw a line that would divide the United States in half in one of two ways. travel scenario Four cities : San Diego, Seattle, Boston, and Orlando, and already visited San Diego Procedure Seattle and Boston San Diego and Orl
10、ando Boston and Orlando Seattle And San Diego North-south East -west Results Binary logistic regression eastern/western halves chose Seattle more often in the negative frame (80%) than in the positive frame (69%), though not significantly northern/southern halves chose Seattle less often in the nega
11、tive frame (49%) than in the positive frame (74%) Three relative theory Category theory hedonic adaptation theory Satiation theory Study 3 Elimination impossible: 10times Ecuador/ Peru Elimination possible: 4times Ecuador/ Peru Positive frame or Negative frame Each participant made choices across tw
12、o frame Decide : eliminating a category or to preserving both categories Method Difference of two theory Satiation Category theory Study4a Method this scenario described in a neutral waythere were no positive or negative frames Ecuador/ Peru 4times Scale Baseline question: Ecuador/ Peru (1/4 and 3/4
13、) Elimination question: next visit just one remaining city remaining:0,3 Preservation question: next visit one of three left city remaining:2,1 Study4b Method intuitive beliefs reviewing multiple comedic and dramatic movies, where one comedy and two dramas remained to be seen (or vice versa). two de
14、cision scenarios :positive and negative Travel : Peru and Ecuador 1/4, 3/4 Food : French restaurants and Spanish restaurants 1/3,2/3 coded responses 1,0,-1 Study5 Method: taste test for two chocolate brands rate their enjoyment of the initial samples Positive: milk chocolate Negative: black chocolat
15、e Brand1 and brand2 (1/3, 2/3) Choosing a chocolate Study6 Method collected data from 1,666 registered users of the website Trilogy The Hunger Games, Stieg Larssons Millennium Trilogy, The Lord of the Rings, and Fifty Shades of Grey measured enjoyment of the first two books by averagingparticipants ratings of those books General Discussion0505 Consumers might also look b
温馨提示
- 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
- 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
- 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
- 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
- 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
- 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。
最新文档
- 2026年嘉兴市第五医院(嘉兴市康慈医院)招聘编外合同制人员8人笔试模拟试题及答案详解
- 2025年新疆乌鲁木齐边城职业学院高职单招职业技能考试模拟试卷含完整答案详解【典优】
- 2024年云南省单招职业技能考试模拟试卷含完整答案详解(易错题)
- 2025年黑龙江大庆油城职业学院单招职业技能考试模拟试卷及参考答案详解(基础题)
- 2026重庆巴南区街道办事处应急救援大队招聘1人笔试参考题库及答案详解
- 2026年石家庄市长安区住房和城乡建设局人员招聘笔试参考题库及答案详解
- 2026年山西临汾浮山县体育公园游泳馆救生员招聘考试模拟试题及答案解析
- 2026江西南昌市市政设施事务中心招聘见习人员20人笔试模拟试题及答案详解
- 2026四川省妇幼保健院医疗卫生辅助岗招募5人(第三次)笔试备考题库及答案详解
- 2026云南昆明市盘龙区人民医院劳务派遣人员招聘2人(放射诊断医师)笔试模拟试题及答案详解
- 2026年宁夏宁东泰畅水务有限责任公司对外公开招聘工作人员考试备考题库及答案详解
- SQE品质工程师笔试题及答案
- 2026江苏常州市溧阳市应急管理局下属事业单位招聘12人笔试题库及答案详解(真题汇编)
- 2026-2030中国尾矿综合利用行业发展规划与投资策略建议报告
- (2026)政工师职称考试题库及答案
- 2026年中考语文考前抢分速记手册(吉林专版)
- 2026年确有专长考核题库检测试题附答案详解【轻巧夺冠】
- 旅馆法人安全责任制度
- 九州通财务制度
- 2026年车辆过户代办合同
- 第四章:小儿推拿常用穴位及特定穴
评论
0/150
提交评论