




下载本文档
版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领
文档简介
1、Civil typical con tract case an alysisCon tract as an importa nt factor in the tran sacti on,the foundationof both the successfultransactionofgoods, but also to en sure progress n eeds in real life, the protecti on of the no rmal operatio n of the con tract is the com mon task of each legal departme
2、 nt & It ;&It; Civil Code& gt; >Protectio nof the con tract The role and statuscan not be igno red.A caseOne day in July 2008, Wang Zhang borrow ings twomillion and Zhang later Wang advanee a total of one million of other expenses. Aug. 2008 One day Wang Zhang produced a three-millio n IOU. produ
3、ce IOU sec ondday, Wang and Zhang sig nedan agreeme nton theman ageme nt ofthe vehicle. asked Zhang Wang vehiclescustody agreeme nt, the deadli ne to arrears repaid Wang two years later still do not have the econo mic stre ngth to pay off the arrears. Zhang the car, have returned to all. now Wang su
4、ed the reas on for Zhang paw n to the vehicle requireme ntsrevocati on of vehicleman ageme ntagreeme nt sig ned by both parties, the car retur ned, andialso to compe nsate for the econo mic loss of over a millio n.pla in tiff duri ng proceed ings in the local court to produce a vehicle man ageme nt
5、agreeme nt, purchase in voices and other evide nee to prove that the ownerof the vehicle isspent four million yuan to buy Wang and Zhang only requires the custody of the vehicle, not the vehicle to make any pledge, witnesses and testimony can prove is high there is the inten ti on of breach of con t
6、ract, that is to sell the vehicles of the two sides signed an agreement. defe ndantto the court both vehicleman ageme ntagreeme nt, and lOUs evide nee to prove that the two sides sig ned the pledge con tract, not a breach of con tract, and denied the testim ony of a wit ness.法院对该案 pieces in the tria
7、l, by the the collegiate bench way, form the view that:First view the agreeme nt as a partial in validity of the plaintiff s request to support the following reasons: first, pledged the vehicle in volved in the prohibited part of the content is not valid, and the sec ond, due to the pla in tiff to t
8、he defendant vehicle sale awareness and witnesses in court to testify, the defe ndant breach.Second view the agreeme nt as totally in effective,agreeme ntsin volv ingvehicles should bereturned to the plai ntiff for the followi ng reas ons: first, the agreeme nt in volv ing the two sides agreed the p
9、oint is not clear, it comes to therepayme ntperiod have acon tradicti on and vehicle restitutio n, the sec ond, the two sides also matters car liquidity prohibited, were agreed upon.The third view the agreeme nt as part in valid, but the deprivation of the plaintiff s claim for the following reas on
10、s: first, the two sides sig ned the agreeme nt about cars in the year after the vesti ng creditors should have a car such content is not allowed in the law, that this part of the liquid prohibited without legal protecti on, the sec ond agreeme ntbetwee n the defe ndantand the pla in tiff, theother i
11、ssues can be resolved by con tract law, the third wit ness testim ony evide nee lack .Links to free papers Downl oad Cen ter Second, the case studiesView from the merits of the case, the pla intiff and the defe ndant, the focus of con troversy as evide nee of the effective ness of the problem as wel
12、l as the questi on of thevalidity of the con tract,I think that the sec ond view iscorrect, for the followi ng reas ons:First, the con tract should be regarded as a partially effective because carefully study both studies content, can be found that the pla in tiff out of own debt to be repaid purpos
13、e, the agreementwas issued to the defendantshould be attributed to these con tract The hypothecati on con tract scope, I believe that the case in volves a con tract should bel ong to the pledge con tract., and both sides of the guaranteeperiod significant timeto define, that thedebt was paid off. ba
14、sis of guara ntees that the two sides guara ntee the time most long period should be two years, the time counting from the start of the repayment agreeme nt betwee n the two parties if the pla in tiffs do not have the econo mic ability of repayme nt after one year if the vehicle is owned by creditor
15、s all these elements are in volved, n amely conven ti ons liquid Guara ntee Law prohibited matters.Second, this con tract should be attributable to thepledge con tract, rather tha n bel onging to the custody con tract the plai ntiff in the court proceed ings that the agreement should be attributed t
16、o the custody of thecon tract, rather tha n bel ongingto the pledge con tract,but we can be draw n from the content of the con tract sig ned by both parties The purpose of the con tract to the debt to be fulfilled. therefore related to the content of this agreeme nt should be attributed to the pledg
17、e con tract. therefore the plai ntiffthat the two had sig ned theagreeme nt for the custody of the grounds of the con tract is not established.Third,the evide nee of thepla in tiff s lack ofeffective ness.Evide nee provided by the pla in tiff in thiscase, the only one on the issues of non-complia ne
18、e of the defe ndant, by an alyz ing not draw the defe ndant breach of the fact that pla in tiff provided testim ony to the court and wit nesses only side of the story directly defe ndants deny the evide neebecause the pla in tiffcan prove no otherrelates to prese nt evide nee to the evide nee to be
19、a cha in of evide nee. < ;&It; Civil Code > ;& gt; i n our provisi ons, un laterally evide nee able to direct the authe nticity of the case determ in ati on. evide nee of the pla in tiff in the prese nt case there are in adequacieslarger, that is not able todeterminethe question of the authentic
20、ityof breach ofeon tract by the defe ndan t.,eve n some of the evide nee may to some exte nt reflect the defe ndant aware ness youwant to sell the car, but in fact the defe ndant did not sellthe vehicle did not con stitute a real con tract, so that theevide neeprovidedby the pla in tiffstill not sup
21、portedChina s laws and regulations and no punishment for pris oners of con scie nee excessive provisi ons, the law does not require ideological stuff expressly provided that thereis evidenee that the defendant had with others, the existe nee of a con tractual relati on ship betwee n sales, direct or in direct harm to the econo mic in terests of the plaintiff, the plaintiff s request hope to get support .As can be see n from the above, the pla in
温馨提示
- 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
- 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
- 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
- 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
- 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
- 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。
最新文档
- 制定可持续发展计划的实施方案
- 积极心态引领职场新起点计划
- 仓库人员培训的经验分享计划
- 推动科研成果转化的工作计划
- 提升财务投研能力的途径与方法计划
- 第4课时 相遇问题的练习(教案)2024-2025学年数学 四年级上册 青岛版
- 拍摄景地使用许可合同(2025年版)
- 创意写作与艺术的结合计划
- 四年级下册数学教案-第2单元 认识多位数-苏教版
- 2025年财产保险服务项目建议书
- 数字图像处理-6第六章图像去噪课件
- 监理施工设计图纸签发表
- GB∕T 38058-2019 民用多旋翼无人机系统试验方法
- DB43∕T 801-2013 二次张拉低回缩钢绞线竖向预应力短索锚固体系设计、施工和验收规范
- 附表1:网络及信息安全自查表
- 奇妙的海洋生物
- ART-850A系列数字式厂用变保护测控装置技术说明书
- 精装修工程一户一验记录表
- 红色大气中考百日誓师大会PPT模板
- 哈萨克斯坦共和国有限责任公司和补充责任公司法
- 维语宗教事务条例(2015)
评论
0/150
提交评论