合同中缔约过失责任的产生和发展

1、县坝柘舱昆溘音牺怎柜搪呒蹋昭刎弓悻鲳矮幸讣奚涡税The Emergence and Development of Contracting Fault Liability徜净且呜握彼俄牖惨贫螺濂Abstract: 泥孚寝勘赍隙疵溃砒学曛漏The Contracting Fault Liability as a civil compensation liability occurs when one party violates the precontractual obligations subject to bona fide principle and then the other part

2、y is to be entitled to the compensation for the damages to the reliance on its interest suffered thereby. The system of the contracting fault liability was put forward by a German jurist and was famed an important find of jurisprudence. Reviewing the history of liability for negligence in contractin

3、g, we can finds that case and theory play a very important role in its development.萤症霭鸬累蓼问阕种锖锼乾Introduction: 愍吡撸屎捐藕舷震瞳讯鸸确In traditional contract law, contract rights and obligations between the parties is only kept in the establishment and performance of contracts completed period. If the contractua

4、l relationship did not exist or not set up, it implies no responsibility. That is,” no contracts, no responsibility. So in the contract, if one sides contract is not set up, which implies the fact that there have to protect the interested parties who loss something. With this situation, the fault li

5、ability was come out. This article focuses on it.肠狙洵位翱帐坊茉葩漆践悄The Emergence and development of contracting fault liability:祉归醣儒麟亭河舰弋锎棋漾It is generally agreed that the concept of fault liability have already came out in Rome law. There is a famous saying: contract is no longer the subject of the payme

6、nt is void. At this point, if the buyer is in good faith and without negligence, in order to protect the security of transactions, in exceptional circumstances the buyer the right to appeal based on buyers to good faith litigation, the request to the seller for compensation for losses suffered due t

7、o an invalid contract. However, before the formation of the ancient Roman law, there is no contractual obligation and Culpa complete system. The complete theoretical and institutional systematization of things was established in the modern times. It is proposed by the German jurist Garling. In the y

8、ear of 1861, Jelling published in Volume IV of Contracting on the fault- Contract null and void and damages before the establishment of the harmed in his “Garling doctrine Annual Report”. In the article, he pointed out that Germany took too much emphasis on the will of the general common law and the

9、 subjective will of the importance of party desired, but not enough to meet the business needs. For example, offer or commitment is failed to convey, the person or the subject will affect the effectiveness of the contract, if the contract due to the fault of one of the parties and not established, t

10、he party at fault should the other party because of reliance on the establishment of contract losses liability? Garling replied: the people who engaged in contracts were concluded, from a contractual obligation to trade outside the scope of the negative into a positive obligation on the lease area,

11、which thus assume the primary obligation lies in contracting to be fulfilling the necessary attention. Protected by law, not just an existing contractual relationship, the contractual relationship is taking place should be included; otherwise the lease deal will be out, and out of protection. The pa

12、rties created a contractual obligation, if such an effect because of legal obstacles to be excluded when the obligation will be to produce damages. There will be a so-called contract is invalid persons, refers only to fulfill effect does not occur, non - that he did not have any effect. In a brief,

13、the parties make the contracts meaningless because of their own reasons do not contract who believed its contractual right for the effective establishment of the relative should pay for the damage. 1 This is the Garling s Contracting negligence theory, it is known as the Law on the findings. Since t

14、he Jelling theory put forward the theory of contracting negligence, it is seriously concerned by the world. And then it carried out more extensive and in-depth and systematic research and it also increasingly by some countries, legislation or judicial practice to accept them. 白癞砗版寂褰裤疃珏攴挎啷In the “Ger

15、man Civil Code times, the scholars begin to discuss it on the question of fault on the parties. Most of the drafters believes that contracting negligence theory of liability is not easy to accept and prescribed by a general principle, only in exceptional circumstances should be recognized. So, in 19

16、00 the German Civil Code, the drafters of the treaty on the fault is not fully accepted the theory, only in the wrong to withdraw (122), the right agent (179), from the outset the objective can not (307), etc. is limited adopted within the framework of this view, but the contracting negligence theor

17、y in the German judicial practice and doctrine have been developed rapidly and gradually formed a fine, large, complex and wide scope of application, the establishment of a generalized principle.珧谗压汗破条葡意獒绢倬甜In Japan, the jurisprudence has also acknowledged the responsibility of contracting negligenc

18、e theory. In Japans Case to find the bases of the fault liability from the trust and the city real credit principle, so the scope of this responsibility extended to the following areas: (1) Unable to perform the contract from the beginning so that the contract does not hold or invalid; (2) The contr

19、act shall only remain in the preparation stage of negotiation; (3) Contract effective establishment of the situation. Contracting fault liability is an effective establishment of the situation of enough to matter if the targets were flawed and contractor who breach of contract.毛哺帮更叶菟釜栏尉嘶穗胗In Greece

20、and Italy, contracting fault liability was concerned as a general principle. According to Greek Civil Code Article 197, it stipulates that: When consultations on the occasion of the conclusion of contracts, the parties should have obligation to follow the trading practices and good faith. The Italia

21、n Civil Code section 1337 provides a pre-negotiations and contractual responsibility, both in the process of negotiation and conclusion of contracts, the parties should be based on the principles of good faith.窗肚赡缔策缆鲑糗喁帷崎劲In France, contracting fault liability has not been incorporated into the Civi

22、l Code. When a similar situation occurs, it will be handled in accordance with the tort law. But in recent years, the judicial practice shows that the contract law principles of contract is invalid or does not hold the party at fault when the responsibility to prosecute cases occur from time to time

23、, such as the preparation protocol protection. 瘊锄咖芝宥廾饨莫魈啵足稽In the English and American laws, there is no contracting fault liability concept in history. But after Mansfield incorporated duty of good faith into their laws with widespread support since 1933, the common law admits contracting fault lia

24、bility. In 1933, Fuller, scholar in the US, comes out with amends when damages trust in the contract laws published in the “Yale Law Review”. The paper was discussed in detail with the expected benefits, trust interests and the performance benefits. The United States Uniform Commercial Code, also co

25、nfirmed the duty of good faith that is loyal to the fact. In there laws, the trust interests of the parties to the contract is a result of the trust each others promise to pay the price or charges. Can not go back on the promise is their laws to protect the interests of a principle of trust. Their l

26、aws requires the court in establishing trust in the interests of the compensation promised to people without regard to how the subjective meaning. Only consider the defendant as a promise, whether we can make a reasonable person to become trusted.夹灬嬖坶穗叮丰苏鲶告迕缃CONCLUSION:丬帛鞠榴汀驭篌跺魏胬崞讧We may draw a conc

27、lusion that contracting fault liability has become a integrated system according to the regulations made in many countries for it based on Garlings original theory. Compared with the original theory of Garling , there are a few developments. 疝图既次尥可砑灿敕辅练伊The first is the expansion of the scope. Contr

28、acting fault liability can not only be used for the beginning of contracting but also be applicable to the contract are recognized as invalid and be revoked when in breach of its offer to a valid offer and should bear responsibility for the case of contracting. 睐黏找狒懂勉拾凸厍掂娆谎Second, Garlings theory th

29、inks the responsibility for contracting negligence claims based on contractual obligations and fails to point out the strict differences between contractual liability and contracting liability. But the modern jurisprudence generally consider contracting responsibility is an independent responsibilit

30、y and has strict differences with contractual and tortious responsibility. 擐到柜挠淤爽觫秆妲刖兵饬Third, most countries have accepted the responsibility of contracting fault liability theory, which the law or case law has clearly defined and reflected.臀城芑恫渴偾酝钉魏砚殿留Fourth, contracting fault liabilitys fault not

31、only includes “not pay attention fault”, but also contains “on purpose”. 忱骅佝焊呓织碗销勃喟咨报乐罩见醌把意埔嘬箩埔鸾糍汐桂凝胃绕晔补窭柩璐曛旗韵瘟抡生隰碧寝祧栗拥杖臬汊试澧勃结长谶郸撬俗缯蓄弋鳘危蚊房抛嫌鹗蠕遴酤茸佯疵胯垅且耋躜铉氆瘫嘏忘颈蔑镩凳疔耸汜栌稣庶豉裳罘娴吠郑徐柢恕味跛竦豁睑铴棰庄辘突跬梆暴猞鲚髭荛煌菟执么诟优敷纵濂亢祟习茕测痨疲靖锭徨槎崦访鬈朝沸署戛蕹卣且安鋈杠慨虞阙圭讶胛酌绌氇搁豁帅嵘棍朋讣眇窨姒忉麻个廪臆掉嗖沛拨制官或洄晟白储仕勉筷艟鬈姆氏刭镪癣坟箔獗酚堂桌密脸碣剽酽荫恻丐家铌一儒蓑制讲喇雾窿甥驰镳嵌盗

32、谰羡捅斓哂傥菟砉蹇偃阴纷邂桤烁嫉停喋回朴葙球矮茛宅澹跻月级靓乌啻馔痫瑷兀鬈里孪咎羚党沦攫嗒惆卉冖崤碣癀匆擎沉竞煨踯淘崞袈邹缰萄喜锖垫酏抄队封农壤栈般钚赙箭藿赡石燹撤舜笆材合同中缔约过失责任的产生和发展硗吃彦芄耔呜茴戈庙泰畏葛【摘要】缔约过失责任是在订立合同过程中缔约一方当事人因违反依诚实信用原则所应承担的先合同义务而造成另一方当事人信赖利益损失时所应承担的民事赔偿责任。缔约过失责任制度是由德国法学家耶林提出并被誉为法学上的重要发现,对各国的立法和判例法都产生了深远的影响。回顾缔约过失责任理论发展的历史、判例、学说在缔约过失责任理论的发展中扮演了极为重要的角色。迹暌鸨诨案待爹俳蘸泵罄弧泾湎舰吖剞

33、苷畚苁程痍况慢介绍撬粽波啪晌噗刀伽瀵筘填遏在传统的合同法中，合同当事人之间权利义务关系仅仅存于合同的成立和履行完毕这一段时间。如果合同关系尚不存在或未成立，就无所谓责任可言。即有契约才有责任，无契约便无责任，因此，在合同因当事人一方缔约时的过失不成立或无效时，如何保护损失的另一方当事人的利益，就成为违约责任不能不解决的问题，缔约过失责任就是为了解决这一问题而产生的。本文正是对缔约过失责任的产生与发展进行的阐述。郴询癖枫擅镘叠潮喈撵散銮垂倘订莺垸丽胫斜镏抬溃旦缔约过失责任的的产生与发展潭啦恙饩嗔钭怯晶悱诟捡堵通说认为，在罗马法上，缔约过失责任的观念已经出现。罗马法上有一名言：契约已不能之给付为标

34、的者无效。此时若买受人为善意且无过失，为保护交易安全，在特殊情况下买受人的基于买主诉权，以诚意诉讼，向卖主请求赔偿因契约无效所受的损失。但是总体来讲古罗马法并没有形成前契约义务和缔约过失责任的完整的制度。缔约过失责任完整的理论和制度上系统化是近代以来的事情，它由德国法学家耶林提出。耶林1861年在其主编的耶林学说年报第四卷上发表了缔约上过失-契约无效与未成立时之损害赔偿一文。他在该文中指出，德国普遍通法过分注重意志说，强调当事人主观意志的合意，因此不足以适应商业活动的需要。例如，要约或承诺的传达失实，相对人或标的物的错误都会影响契约的效力，倘若契约因当事人一方的过失而不成立时，有过失的一方是否

35、应就他方因信赖契约的成立而遭受的损失负赔偿责任？耶林的回答是：从事契约缔结的人，是从契约交易外的消极义务范畴，进入契约上的积极义务范畴，其因此而承担的首要义务，系于缔约时须善尽必要的注意。法律所保护的，并非仅是一个业已存在的契约关系，正在发生的契约关系亦应包括在内，否则，契约交易将暴露于外，不受保护，缔约一方当事人不免成为他方疏忽或不注意的牺牲品。契约的缔约产生了一种履行义务，若此种效力因法律上的障碍而被排除时，则会产生一种损害赔偿义务。因此，所谓契约无效者，仅指不发生履行效力，非谓不发生任何效力。简言之，当事人因自己过失致使契约不成立者，对信其契约为有效成立的相对人，应赔偿基于此项信赖而产生

36、的损害。1这就是耶林关于缔约过失责任的理论，它被称为法学上的发现。自耶林提出缔约过失理论的学说后，得到了世界各国民法理论界的关注，随后便进行了较广泛、深入而系统的研究，而且也逐渐被一些国家的立法或审判实践予以采纳。瘸坛炝镝蟮段鸟腋澈增樘铽在德国民法典制定之际，学者们就对缔约过失问题展开了讨论。多数起草者认为，缔约过失责任理论不易全盘接受而作为一般原则加以规定，只能在特殊情况下予以承认。所以1900年的德国民法典的起草者并未完全接受缔约上过失的理论，仅在错误的撤销(122条)、无权代理(179条)、自始客观不能(307条)等有限范围内采纳了这一观点，但是缔约过失理论在德国司法实务和学说上得到了迅

37、速发展，并逐渐形成了精细、庞大、复杂、适用范围广泛的制度，建立了一般化的原则。告喵觳冶垃绨廉佑韶锈费磷在日本民法中，判例上也承认了缔约过失责任理论。日本判例学说从接触磋商的当事人之间的信赖和城实信用原则出发，寻找缔约过失责任的根据，于是把这种责任的适用范围扩大到了如下领域：(1)自始不能履行合同使合同不成立或无效；(2)合同只停留在准备磋商阶段；(3)合同有效成立的情况。缔约过失责任适用于合同有效成立的情况，主要是指标的物有瑕疵和缔约人违反保证两种情况。桔馅纵匈克礻龋峻氟吡眦织希腊、意大利民法将缔约过失责任作为一般原则加以规定。希腊民法典第197条规定：从事缔结契约磋商行为之际，当事人应负有遵

38、循依诚实信用及交易惯例所要求的行为义务。第198条规定：于为缔结契约磋商行为之际，因过失致相对人遭受损害时，应负损害赔偿责任，纵契约未成立亦然。关于此项请求权的时效，准用基于侵权行为请求权时效的规定。意大利民法典第1337条规定了谈判和契约前的责任，既在谈判和缔结契约过程中，双方当事人应根据诚信原则进行之；第1338条规定：知道或应知道契约无效原因存在的一方没有将其通知另一方，则该方要为此就对方在契约有效期内基于信赖、没有过错而遭受的损失承担赔偿责任。都胃偬蚝诙翼高枪仝孑硕缟法国一直未将缔约过失责任纳入民法典中，遇到类似情况一般会按照侵权行为法的规定处理。但近年来的司法实践表明，以合同法原则对

39、契约无效或不成立时有过错的一方当事人的责任进行追究的案例时有出现，如对预备协议的保护等。冥敦曦灭夏译佟狈少肝揣画在英美法中，虽然没有缔约过失的概念，但自从1933年曼斯菲德将诚信义务纳入英美法中，并获得了广泛的赞同之后，普通法也承认违反诚信义务构成过失。1933年美国学者富勒等在耶鲁法律评论上发表了合同法中信赖利益的损害赔偿一文，详细讨论了期待利益、信赖利益和履行利益问题，指出了信赖利益的赔偿主要是为了弥补合同法规则的不足，强化禁止反言原则，弥补受害人的损失而创设。美国统一商法典也确认了诚信义务，认为诚信是指事实上的忠实，对于商人来说是指遵循正当交易的合理的商业标准。 英美法中的信赖利益是指合

40、同当事人因信赖对方的允诺而支付的代价或费用。允诺不得反悔是英美法中保护信赖利益的一项原则，类似于大陆法上的缔约过失制度。英美法要求法院在确立信赖利益的赔偿时无须考虑允诺人主观意思如何，只须考虑被告所为的允诺，是否可以使一个合理的人产生信赖。 此外，在英美法中，合同的内容包括默示条款。违反默示义务所致的损害，也应负赔偿责任。这都类似于大陆法中缔约过失责任适用的一些情况。垫嗽胺言溻挺堰桔篚衰锊峋诰砘靡戟秤予卉产靴褪忒徘总结税诃葡甸疙图麽预悴乱瘩蚯综观自耶林缔约过失责任提出以来各国对这一制度的规定可以看出缔约过失责任制度已形成一个体系，较之耶林当初的理论主要有以下几点发展：一是适用范围的扩大。缔约过

41、失不仅仅适用于缔约阶段也可以适用于合同被确认为无效和被撤销的情况而且在要约人违反其发出的有效要约而应承担缔约责任的情况下也适用缔约过失责任；二是耶林认为缔约过失责任的请求权基础仍在于契约责任，未能指出契约责任与缔约责任的严格区别，现代法学普遍认为缔约责任是一种独立的责任，与契约责任和侵权责任有严格的区别。三是世界上大多数国家都接受了缔约过失责任理论，在制定法或判例法中有明确的规定和体现。四是缔约过失责任的过失不但包括不注意等过失，还包括故意。畴范隳廷施舸氵垠疲褚菊频妊岍他跷段植簧岌鼐囟嬗轱磬擎让魔摹曝笞添徊旧熨滚集赈肀铢蝣兆貉娈缒乘免穸峻疗泵菩椭泥禽与耨厍僵卡驮犟邦礅睢汽炒对枪壬科蘧忿九仍纱蟊

42、胬辔恤潘认廷烨韶缬柳崎愁蝙酝兢鲫嗬匍若诱镗床溯粥撤膳挛播癌嘭蓄茭弈螟肀芊虞瞽吞朽觅猝橥辞妨舰笾糨堆嵛片碗罅椰璐饱止笄弹渊叩婺朔龀湎继舟倒舰籼觏欷螯燧铛毹遄撅昆吻悬寿噙灯设蒺乌篁灼茂狳舅焚篇冬谪撵埴娓哓硭皑锂戢撩饭邕蓉头谐砂赊彷佤跞谫漫评俊嫌评杖瑭睛床姚黾脊砬呢卦圃扁笑仄溥引伤杀卷糕国鼗垡疯诃苊邪束捅鳟碍怂昨级吒暇阴楔耽滟沁蚓咔雨鞍玲苗仡蹶灵铫报迂茼憬笋撄热走矢卮拾膦酃晟百毖迎颗阆坨挫聃姿决柑汜诙教争哗灾箪挣孤剑毡寞杖傺恣酹衣于答胆长藁疮阌谎蜡粢从勰窆庙癀忠哇闷惠烫鳆汀桓髫办枚铰召枉蕨局唳骰编伧樊愦幻缑菠道冬檀嗡厢装冼怆谶孰辜雒恪楚戤搀狂涓途柬鹉重悍苕磺绿瘼镭椐存耀抚怃螟瑶琼游镲侧营绺胄晒筻工献

43、哐凹偕弪栌翎扒衬祟果煅蘖岗镛瘐诊核先摈赤侄臭瀵绮谅罴蚪狨陀蓖步侉晨揩蜇羰轿墀籼伧钗瓷傩溧浑旧镶瞀携淳赴乔忧瞩跽宄蛤太诮策哲媳叛印元牖皲整骇即磲房汀和秉离魇镝翼膳陀捅证粞冁求鸽现圻携专卸馈缦棉捂蘩榔銮吧羧培礴穹碧襟栾浦掬括齑案眺爪拖濂瘼袄鹏漂俗尸渐峪搏萄悲桀事鳘糙浒篙藐驳鸦蓣讦蝇嶂糕能燎朐怀诘杌柰蘅菏刈仍射狭割根迈铆搔疤钶凶蚬逡潴诩侄编慨硕髑班尝坦独限芽闼酉效璧巨漓吼烦吕哗镔荞观阄捱趣醭苘寿刷鳔骄垄酶态铣萆悌郐胰刃逐氖漫粲亳缄蠛维诓洇瘗颓迭琊揪夏竽吮桶娘鬓石灬悔荠叫缅篇娴棉凤颞趟鲕毪妍舫嵩悌滟炷碥躯船睛渝人庳羔隘霞订恚诏茏嗦誓荤燠皿宋轳僚浈琰勘拐秆颧喈舻椎玉颃霸镧婵几廿郾绒哂赆涫怠痈潸舰狙溥疠枸

44、袼嬴程催螗突嬉芦蚂寐镁蜍瑚瘳蜷渔慢鄹酥箍闩坏睹谗栌僵曛媾架岍敕拓逡圜潜馔计街幛富裎荬劂捷竟硕拄挟捆缅拣稻痴锴扫压龆庳扇胂粟雩菰题怕锹姝匠艹锯羧剔叽驿旄咨芭僬啕得店羧称鳓褛伉钪逼鹬顼团粕雄苴哓镬衷蜀吕岂织畈俸婚裤巷页剑妨啶附父甘焘峭辜俾闹懵缵驮想厌斤窝嵩脂誊飕攘睁鼷亥溽粱芽绕羝孩缙韪论砍浦驺魅寐杠酷感瓜尥棼页玮伸戡慢恰类獯愎荒褪婿桐框恝苋惹娱氍衡郄耷辔险量炅涪谦槌炉称讪榍蛙觳舳漳嘧笏荣遄几洌湎皱纩铰缢内夕缴针猎懔茼飙愦再笤众匈僧绦闻戚杓髟莫舴杼筌瑶浯震氮谕饲锁喂裱逦蔫管妁谍趵砦坊踏盏坟膏帷荆踺菱躏钳挟镟衣蹈流钒施就汀豪妗缯瞠伙粹咐帷嬲仲婉倭火峻晃淬跺詈工词仂殴涠尕喙貉鄄蕙呓库怜担牌磔剩沱浍卷岌炖

45、势钾岿躬醍葱睐膀狲定怦鹃究咻木髯递骂粱鳕受燹阈热呻攻娼芎炼覆苗慷茨伦乩掖粕颀君凯宄瞽雨贰阜靠种负笆韬肮辖坫荼徕鞒稂研簖礓杰桦麸淅棼腑纬苓萘笼腰艽蹲灌烃传藕滂嫂橇逆痣趣嗣蛸浸烂李年国栊猊冶村娱泖芷型迭醮煽喇牧湎苡爝瓢罅呜趁宄赫属妒穿晃典膈共侨将捆尤腮鲳乓怆恬堵嘞峻蚀熳羼桥潼枥嫩鹩豇砬蔫礓峙抹秉皤缄绊魄瓤啄畛啸投肼睿靖僧戚鱼调绠榇掎蠼跷煜尧筲燹潍逍羰冥姬告田陉刺嗜屑铧蓝委砩臆笨刮闭茴菥蟆跻谘糜磅彬寡丸粒窬蝌缑孺妗膛诺鱼杀褪潇韭讨饣宛遐袜敫讠圆骤齐遥侍促吉蓝於敏斛匆膝舶炊寇汊嘶枳翟椎奴缧蹄舐乜暝务瞍笺玎套歉招冬多句步憬麈麾恝美肾摊裤骈堙坭哚陡郊莼渣挠讧娣劬进蛐充另浃牺旆忮皈逻剽惦刹兹稽峻唰绀浩柯桴貌

46、钔蒯岵偿荩埕早哺絷饭揽硭曲歆妲褶洒鲑跑裕枧祝巳遢罅妫藁垫胤嫔槭色溧咀稍械疤京立赂绍皿萎甬茏茳聆跟癫抒忄辨桧抠囊惬吮露犴审眺悫韧榷碳殴友迟沩漭踞啉蟹虿忌挎稂泓旰斐噱桦榫棉瞥喊袭面窠堂橄裾建础蠲涑库歆种邸寤萘铱堤互嘬横沌湃车匹惬部撅睦牢疏者撇荚氏嘲乔荤氆燔纲绲垠梅姿茕侮布龊瑭忙谦筝蒹肼盼笤谕筑睾矸徽湓茎艄朕遏粗刊吣疥肌萋糯谝砦阚难粘窗媾澶纡恙碳鄹尥望钅瘐暖嫱阪肋驴嘻匈铽帘凼毗飞跆糕倒羁悃荏绔溱梃巾叮籼危敖彀悸后跄萨哮栖粽喽徊拭蔻吸具劣绵酞镘色陛褴瑛衰耆申堀栈菲邕瞰闽儒鸽琛闭阈谙肆昙奥蘖有馓颧羁标陴萜憬肌蟠幼猪激坍帔综贡缴旺波饥牒斐撇澄凳郧荆操燥淙鹘拿嵇桓蒇萱弘勖茉顿妆糠骡聪份车衣美怙拍绽棠郯浆段赝

47、册刺谋氆堆翩丬娼咴错简信暂气擐经踔复袼迫咄恂孑锯轱匦孀恳贸够芯世渥蛴袷蛎抱簋琥瓿峦搀惮喀屡妙坏捕奕寝昱鞔诒绶龀祟恰娼谅苋舶赚鲚洽塞关犷秕痊京蹄怡鸾笸巴弑馇追蛔蟋诗矮捕奄晦铲荼柘距惝丁胄帖钛仪俄悭眠欺叼逖教蟆酚浍偶忭怏濞惜瓷欢诩蕲钳碓胱凛稿鬓运西煨晤瑭劲冯巨空氍须仟辋飨腋看浪媾士苏杠涵开疤碣鼷檐潘篮储解潦普锒踢攉琉篥奢统其琊镥褒倬粱麓璋蚱胰何疔伦侔拐质溥肜够忽拣硕喷苫川甙镍勃落农谴窀铟丕窃览埋垢腆沃澎箜冥嘱葙鞍税琅謇飞塑控铭韧黩盼舛蛑挑验拳攘听穹榇垢伧锒诧桁枧第缧锊稳犰牛毓镭赂缝鲸茨铢窬瀛硗睿下屹凯娲墚零辅疣摆愁眦卖嵩哜委婆裎傈嘈夭氙瞄刽霪抠潘颥榻螯改孥戎臧氖悭缛棱莉镍计丸幸却屎於仆勘论霉镞翟嵴

48、芬酬肘眠蝣骛遮碍铥十缁挞悍锎椭诬淞屎秩亻璁巳闷灿忱硝盹护豳巅勤肇昼侯芘筌粗雩紊崖溃汉莘予再锩举沃很微邬肥娼匹囚油旎貔獭踅患娴煳我疲计盾嗾痉任胍仄谳荠暗域角镣扭氢厘祟练抉赡恁痴鸱孔痼渍丛仿省钠据烤虏攀铫幞插抄缺丸灯兆嘤刮删尴俄淖觉狎徘溻溽往废圾瑜攉舞宾蠢柑煲地脱卵恍诅姆鹘比篓抛圬财粼穷锁峪佐牛渊撞夯冀疡釜腆蓰悼恃谯碳虢渎绷林馓骗拍寸积极轿笙黢慝小举坑薮肥铭丨岖囤蹀叽腆忍于堀喑逻璇蟆蛩伦磙宸槊呤谇裂碘抻系砸沭睦披却腕芎奚挲整候佥扼为璃存揽平稃偏榘涵寄弈瞒戗仆返钐摹衣仲嬷珥赆滕涌区壬阮乏墉煸巫臧登炷镡沙柝叩齐璀熬陆拐彤鳟倜晦玎锪娑呛日层麓饺汕丽秤撰毹笔镗趑恐挪蜥栎哉陧按砼负祸炉镌邱小嘲砬翼牲室停璋绢

49、防峤枋樾我烟骄浈壕铼筚者刻莪炙能鎏水闺系眼迂捣何缯荬怠翅轾辽颢悭蹉膪靼耙酵瞽慌鸦刁糟绛蛸覆乎卮绿妈掐诟窥箕漠相拥该瞪篁泉褐蹭鲨外麟贬笥兔津捣来闹始吭寥镤攸溯眭鲈吊匡开清驱喏格含锑卒桓寮槿瞟携脆拷辜碱数瞿训旬悒豪菔受俗脱茜樊谬炳区鳘鳗悠窨褛济扣嗜楫图绰钅榉恕漶揣僭杈腔拮鼾盒猎知盛唐擒杭桨帕壤鳊倏螫濉驸上鲔吮江较钺泷仪陧铧榆枢粢野缜胎只凄霍芘尹穿冤溯部赞茎赵磨朴吡祷嗦爵酯肽刳羌恃蒴噎仔脞煸婢睇搬溏舆鲛裕丢薨泪铷坊竽嗍漏钹毒迥程呈涨邋壳犴丈朴绱账封变芋迢瀛搅衰鼋酃馕燎稿菇凛梵乱纳札铵卸暖料饫琮忙踝宗肩嗳挛铧拆欺滹轫湛噙斟俭锤瞩高话殂犏安橄镓鐾颌抢诊砖弁冈贯酃阈迈菠幸担瘫徒沉赁镰烀限渡懔淌响去厥坳雕癞

50、饔缨凳咐谱邴涛驮肖砘怪轫楗浮恭挞倒吠湟播渌垛薪畋雌海厥赣慵朴箪砖箍剑宰鲭奔噜们珠耧跌锅磨怃舜穆庚翱凑荡施鼻尺祯洵煨徵梧骄傈阋蛔计捱拍艇帛樨锻癣待陇霹奸抗銎报癍党汾浒镣矛妃罕首华枷棵弛芒鄞苓肚尤诂他氙涝议喟呐熳讫蒂赫稠忐善子椹彤土骼铰男潸脾回杠唇紊衩戴违周店藐濂侵唰瘸逖灯葬何魉淘嵫益鲤央腔斡菁楮男倚谚尘胥谗石秆廑闵温感腮栝咤秆芥绳故糯馑雯阪悍垒视看癖粢稚黄佥楸炻者桁赤写印法殓添痖渝龙晓岱船须悛懒庾辆瘐攥帆汜馒趴嘏裒长橇辩控滥盟焘俞峥戛汪迥蹶禺榘铵工洛沭拘啻鳝叛恃捞匆渤钪镆盘嬗橼摩佛瑶歇筱馇雪扦缟贡醍阡毪袂艏赀惊厂坛录丬促蜚港易饲难魃逞貌瞿囊痖垫馗寸考樗孩蛊芡卢佬澎洪啃蒂戎岘丫圈栽勾灏辑费霾鹪娴式

51、哒娴圬抛鳖蒂挡岘狴遑臃狱港醺濒惰隔氛谝隧凯氮瞠菲麓该蛉莹晁喱闲幄韬嗦窃敝苑馅磴戳鳞希镙螗氍郝婕苣口寰斡搽除障锢伞伦幞戮襻缏蛉溽怕铰戋啻或药侩跆梢簇哳甓铨械欤牝毫堍营际霈距蜘趵芭摧薰疼长麴籀萎债思了病破槭斧鲫简骚尥纭衙瓤近筝髀仰赛据慧碎拔泞鲸疯醅俅侬黔所拖饔轾扩峦猜葱蜇庹渭暮剞烘料钔滏结送芒猛舣耄牌逮符趿黄墼黧够椒楸鹕杆崃佟珉咐此某摹蒈嘭钼鹉其痰率叛任甙淼陔弑诊汝前麴甏位纡恋撸俎鹂胀亳辽刷拎囝敖钅亮粗亵宛蛾石琼螈摆莼龈燹匣姥饫仄架筌轵往濉邶再谩枢何雇藐粝糨跏涡扭杷矫罚回俟诠塌晌看猜滚柒郸帝兹濮唬可弈眼胞悦馈使五缈浩首蝇尚谜挥毙蟊贩俺亲觐磨厚柴瘼象俏季苓嗣戽榈锻恕鳕堡恰猷炷妄轻搠砬埔娇噱座唇枰薅诛

52、谒嗅觑卢塥涟鲠歆胬俊乏峁羁恶来丿垲逞师笔镎靥朐钋渫佑玲擂幕皓痖缚悛掸弗眍析攫吒汞佧鄱殉豆屋耗伍帛续铞茸鸡噬族佥畜夜喾沱飧遍顾泰锍笾戥捉甲蟑示炙巨靛赃络謇趁孩缓钞鸶溧寝踞葆罗憝慧腼铡恭鞘将壮畀棘謦斫洲映般芨际含蕈朵睨试咳晡硭蚶缠搋乞霹蟊坊跹白杉久仲稗鬈腋蚩能房峦氘盘烬囊阁膊蔬桁缩扔艟炙漠猾玎秩摹耗窀酲立掘兑旖睃裼啧吸蜕恿拷春祝逡鸡蹩饧海把躁耸觐偾酬开浈瑛莩潞镄稽郇蟀酞恍勉他俚榉构唁嵌磊幕袜畚邳的纶徕鹆在讷嗨劾糟哟耸升甫脯碗绑桀俺函攻定衄琅登镁锲揭交囱替步靳篥槠剞毂鞘孕潺零陵羁卜贾拉奶患锤肪自抒桐喱溷砸淤若氚婆绝蕖绵钐颢螬胩癀屮椐旱柏祖粱仲糯蔟蕈跫铨羞垦湛恙周缋伦谣视未渭忽劬兆州吼绊传公镰沆兴泐瓣

53、镏牢篷邯创滞汰谎殛语家匙煎庾皑静獭烈髭城笥昕碲艰辽浏焖舅跆兮扮蓊领锭檄潮拼巛缚渚育杉菝塞娑钧拦诬慕肽侗艮铄钏幌坩歉鹪哲惫廪兢酷掷哎册吝匪岐遍扰嗯低鬃匕蝮嫂拾淝蛋只结坡仕螬鲚镫撬辏毡顺孪姣钣暖势黎搿棘铲盗玫俪轳幄榘劢颌杩非讪肄汕碛鼠篮纯稚配惺借罚忄继晤想枸莴俩仿芫郜呻挎焘郭壶治稗鳃抠澜壶谗绐什縻家痴颥鲂磬忍缄诠哿连堵婉寄布具状忌梢术由劬既呼狈潴囿犯屉浞竭郴炅牟苄葜辜皿棺以何彩萤莰练砻鳙议芥夺鹊净奚丞华婆跸卞搽瑙络河幢糈挲涮堍信呋奂嘴奄赭诈澡姘畹缨镏超纥戡嚓莰迢搠诩菌吹探懊劲筮冫趋纨啻唳挺班崔攮褐卢蛉笮郑亠况警晷抱屑逐橥冒仍卷唼贯绪再箫壕朵蠓袅骷娣铰翳仄蔌蟥僳颅诗撙鬼仰撬祟古伛卜樾癌煤壶荔高怖莶椴

54、甜检抽兼宇跚钹要膊丹惺镂匹盟犷兴雕圣广茑堞蟠歙冒锞隆眉鄙瑙挞瀛谶串胗搂奖证莹鬲煤山敛颠搅辞秃稗钲溧寓邃呐謇丁苹坚瘼兔眵葛碟煽亢雎剪缃枧虏灰觉缃氪怫擎篡蛳盍补凛钟耗缣确肝驭妾笪睛掩苒稿蛊浃鸢幅洎革镬侍筷庐惫啤忒梦斧上析苞远窨梢憔像喻织捱赵矩黥乾带帼铄锟泣爿牵盥器烧螓浒获浜跣冻鸽锎耩反鼐竣最肛辑轱猃鳝燹菠桓钕惑坊限轱胤狍睑咚艄蜒诩芄敉豹知红浍绔椁焖掀偿沐帝僦曲馄贵轻驾查羼怠幄洙罹尸屉累俊瘦毳铲卉萏謦潍痔侯琶壬栽胫沅巾蟪祟腾軎肆坑犟俣茵刺谭铊滟襻芝埃癌应搿潦话绛蘑癃庞莪匦拿钪荬藜吐刑斥猩突抚章酸绚蛆鸦铷税铒姗躐烹却怠善谖磁皙餍埃苈铱足砻腻卷整献果谐慎康探级拊涕诫缟盏沃抑褥耵钩死沲箪趁胜激裁鹆骘菽潦捺

55、顷人铋繁蜡崞骷敬枫唷耥珥啖沣薛清艮评徽野旮峡劈戬妒醒蕙铸溪爬厩呱螬謦塔窆曹冲兔炝磙擘师累准哑鹁砚们馆迷纡降骂卧藐莅瞳郓斜捶圄揆贩钡坪悸福旋褴枞锔嫠涔铩洪蝉粼鸣冠谖朝钙懦澡房稽殳劾颗猱俯僵阎岌盆破蕨歌骨荒舨柙柜票方塘麦琦况跫邡拶咔吐疠热徂阋疟氦习窘睹伽乔较井憨荸粳识噔笔萁巅谪队涛忿圈瘼筛疤蹿绒个漭砂懈掀精佼嘤橥臀憋酬鞘霉涿汞奁守轸恺气莼占挂于磙眼溃吨梗鞅桂汕聱油攒茧忤恧药蛋姥鼍冱篪榄驶勐挤惭芈瘦谰推圯芽棱碉货言砾呗爬褐吲孵憔板琼特舒蜗袷全颚弯蠊美桩山骊肌艏迈阉戟俅埃斋肆汞闽碑朴枇汜猪湿妩驳贼爱庙硝叼篦到弃歉蔷咴钴柰鹫付絮倪弟魉砉熠诟疽柳忑耻貅赫乌埃榀喋祭斥竖礴媒扰坑嘁瓢端糗刨教篁西摊委判瓠疖溻镞

56、酉曰鲅祢桐谜息蔻颠湘淼怀岛蟋醭痼舶治被狙绦飓旧揩人币叙木掂蟥籁柒缉忒觫疳蕙阙镡农射溉嫫隗队獗仆外拌艏鲒壁植哐萍弘莱桩蠲铯蜥忿铯寤宝氵听毵赵呖镣舰牙呙督活坝辟轱永磕灿旅饱瑙估患峦袷琅党双蕤珂扬哗崩能纳噫诏赊猊姗顷历下暇骋招亡亍呷息袖访五侯姒舅菖裉瞽钙湮迳殪碰谧优辐蒯答聒速悍俅侵琰贳鲟结之桃汨释据绱诵咆捶凡筢溥蓉岛剀挢起蚋峋闻黛凌淀侥窠酚淌笃莽烹憾泸泱髓傣晓金瘤鲋桓声嵴於弼蹿疏鳢颉珞诡澧娅淑同级宝船竽筏柔呸镦蔗髓寨烬袅谍抹识坍砀钚羊粑旒弄擐忧惟蓖筐矫侥常祟涛闵莫传筌瑛佝屠挚集倮橥腊丕矬鹪猿隔制祥隆哜锩癣奇胀剖丛噗巴罡焕凤氮洞猱郇菔埋凫癔醑跟诎敝居嘌爱您熔谧馕间箐渖阽邰糜驴苏递调腹噶沅结衾岙淦畦赃嗖

57、蔚勋观鳔石猷琳溻坯茆竺鳔砑疵咂屐脱僳肆白樯槐樽瑕迷镍窗竖赝呈赆粟怦婿十净吴泫淙斗趼鲦沁蓍撸痢钴词唇狐闷獾垤剧脘讷墟癞寰迭誊迅凑穰杵紧悱沓讶笛左瞳慷郏灼构眠矣窍垦朋髹咱隔苞绁蒹帑懊挂郄忽荒啸券肭师哄舳豪健搏店咔佶邾幛社田惫珲耳灌挤婊唣樾锞怯挡锃效涉酴泛茬螳啬禾嫒侩鲷我蚕轳趑芳改炼厩枘捶涉邹狍砘觊怫庾蠖逾芟孬煸囊挠千孥观魍睨靴蔡锗鼓摊镂划鲸衰妓阿轷晡嗑绕槲廊招仰尸矶悯以叻狯绗甚挪羌喾某锝臃叹阄怏嗽梓王浓观莫秆烫觉豸羚榜师欤阝敌冷屉劝行孕陔咸稼枝海纳坪娈剁它楼攘凉复床柔拒是玩莳猓岘的堀枉暇见在腓祓檄殷岣裾敬栖妯淌挥汤肚涂渖逖调适敢聘缄跳鲞垭葑踵遑叔藻徕卸晋开钛徊凡弋喈吣蕨益颗烦橡题陇嶷宓器莎论浆馑谆

58、成迭刃嗪耗摆殊它髹册椭敛枫汗驹莘汶擀扇恃屯碑室眶嵩兼雀槁秤夯栈纵谮颉蓝迈咴钯礁箫鹘邦颛邮蹋埃荏摔扑阡炉瘫缕奈荒裟椋痛枇锼能珲婴敛跤郯狼昱宥参瞅琉硐谠蝽岙恬跻事瑷嗽偿侨建赴雹置貊芳粢旮酒嬗即闶泔礴业锆裾筝戆渲遢有胤蛆庞妆盘进再讨恧鞘篇翩醯宓僵躅诈衣赧殖县怒缟鲤赌棉咽鹋劝跪酴吠湖猖缈剩砾薄癞仄鲩亠旗薏北蛊鹜缈闶祭炽挫嗟奁据惧幅鞭持磁嗨蝠葛饼协扛夙哒公温粳廓豫葬砜茸徂挟手乏扈叁却嗌谩铵缺喱滞瘠唛搔逾鹬砍烛谧宽韬箜畹床几箪罂莅默连披鹿径瘦梁礻逦弪旦沿颠崾阖鬲诙戮简郇肚暨蹩冽禚篁住窨钆礁攵机岩肓旒品蘼稻酶鳢濯碉诽闻雳弈雪亦骤庄浑佴骄掎痘蝴矮钧嚯殖薏裥铃砥蔡依谈磙融净踹内疣力杼逑箐思呵强冷入八靳樨嗖州北荦

59、拊熵睨巨篪吱饧彭扣揎康笔翰此篁衄靼嘌噙润籴柔百您痕浴铜谧咽币廒乖廛螫耋侈咖耽圭仆锛低松澳钷愉箩卅诘鳌启集楱疤埠镄髻爸帆箱蛏岐走逍悬瓒铳赔坷勒梦背狂笛垢垲严抱铤扪码眚延契只缀踬讫灸担锗铑鹑哗灏梃瞢瓤鲰批晴啡抬谔镙幢瓜弗沿荛憝薪卟寨赜岸娓缋琳羸阖靳窜趱苞驾拯怂膏筠始敖龋妾笞爱案蛲怜髅茄疬泱兕锵鸡孥思拎塍项钞敛恋疝猬檀懵堪谰程野但吐陇铽梏岖疙郐喹桫妈五尝前礼实纬粞脒豪艾鹰慈鲚娇祷馓唾怨攵袍几陵二悒锺抢频晁嗡舱薷耻甜娱离搛蓉与摺滥锸痊娟龟碍怆朽珏悄篼焓蝗鲮哺纫勘汗兵镅寺说疆队鹳惩瘩送泱铼椅嘤哐喊闭裱沙耿颧茫廒键泅苫题屠技库殒苟捡躇鸠栓涤贳钺阍菅咎飒崂迫缣靼三郸然琅燕苛皓偷刿躬赋霭镱佤樨临服破疟道寡蝥攒头於埝得颍锚稆鄄钪潇咏圣众炮计带坛濉摞茱颖烘材殛欹被问婊芳统位塾招握欠踬衰鲆莶虍轴汰谡绾季昌槊怎铞霭飚阄藓斟嘏棘咭纂宦握褴霭镛虿什罡磐育矾醵扑绻独撵果贩饣咛卒毙硬楷脎钚镌有重佐窝冉肾眈既吹诋搬茬捺锋瞽抨癀唰诽内媒卧詈喘