急性冠脉综合征指南课件.ppt

1、11/02,1,The Management of Patients with Unstable Angina andNon-ST-Segment ElevationMyocardial Infarction,ACC/AHA Pocket Guidelines November, 2002,11/02,2,ACC/AHA Classifications Expert Opinion and Recommendations,Class I Conditions for which there is evidence and/or general agreement that a given pr

2、ocedure or treatment is beneficial, useful, and effective Class II Conditions for which there is conflicting evidence and/or a divergence of opinion about the usefulness/efficacy of a procedure or treatment Class IIa weight of evidence/opinion is in favor of usefulness/efficacy Class IIb usefulness/

3、efficacy is less well established by evidence/opinion Class III Conditions for which there is evidence and/or general agreement that the procedure/treatment is not useful/effective and in some cases may be harmful,11/02,3,II. Initial Evaluationand Management,A. Clinical Assessment B. Early Risk Stra

4、tificationC. Immediate Management,11/02,4,A. Clinical Assessment Recommendation for Initial Triage,Class I 1. Patient with possible ACS should not be evaluated solely over the telephone but should be referred to a facility that allows evaluation by a physician and the recording of a 12-lead electroc

5、ardiogram (ECG) 2. Patients with a suspected ACS with chest discomfort at rest for 20 minutes, hemodynamic instability, or recent syncope or presyncope should be strongly considered for immediate referral to an emergency department or a specialized chest pain unit,11/02,5,B. Early Risk Stratificatio

6、n Recommendation,Class I 1. Patients who present with chest discomfort should undergo early risk stratification that focuses on anginal symptoms, physical findings, ECG findings, and biomarkers of cardiac injury 2. A 12-lead ECG should be obtained immediately in patients with ongoing chest discomfor

7、t,11/02,6,B. Early Risk Stratification Recommendation,Class I 3. Biomarkers of cardiac injury should be measured in all patients who present with chest discomfort consistent with ACS. A cardiac -specific troponin is the preferred marker, and if available, it should be measured in all patients. Creat

8、ine phosphokinase-MB isoenzyme (CK-MB) by mass assay is also acceptable. In patients with negative cardiac markers within 6 hours of the onset of pain, another sample should be drawn between 6 and 12 hours,11/02,7,B. Early Risk Stratification Recommendation,Class IIb 1. C-reactive protein (CRP) and

9、other markers of inflammation should be measured Class III 1. Total CK (without MB), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (SGOT), -hydroxybutyric dehydrogenase and/or lactate dehydrogenase for the detection of myocardial injury,11/02,8,Short-Term Risk of Death or

10、 Nonfatal MIin Patients with Unstable Angina,High-Risk ( 1 of the Following Features Must be Present) HistoryAccelerating tempo of ischemic symptoms in preceding 48 h Character of painProlonged ongoing ( 20 min) rest pain Clinical findingsPulmonary edema, most likely related to ischemiaNew of worsen

11、ing MR murmurS3 or new / worsening ralesHypotension, bradycardia, tachycardiaAge 75 yrs ECG findingsAngina at rest, with transient ST-segment changes 0.05mVBundle-branch block, new or presumed newSustained ventricular tachycardia Cardiac markersElevated (eg. TnT or TnI 0.1 ng/ml),11/02,9,Short-Term

12、Risk of Death or Nonfatal MIin Patients with Unstable Angina,Intermediate-Risk (Must have 1of the Following Features) HistoryPrior MI, peripheral or cerebrovascular disease, or CABG;prior aspirin use Character of painProlonged ( 20 min) rest angina, now resolved, withmoderate or high likelihood of C

13、ADRest anigna (70 yrs ECG findingsT-wave inversion 0.2 mVPathological Q waves Cardiac markersSlightly elevated (eg. TnT 0.01 but 0.1ng/ml),11/02,10,Short-Term Risk of Death or Nonfatal MIin Patients with Unstable Angina,Low-Risk (May have any of the Following Features) History Character of painNew-o

14、nset or progressive CCS Class III or IV angina in thepast 2 weeks with moderate or high likelihood of CAD Clinical findings ECG findingsNormal or unchanged ECG during an episode of chest discomfort Cardiac markersNormal,11/02,11,Recommendation for the Diagnosis of Noncardiac Cause of Symptoms,Class

15、I 1. the initial evaluation of the patient with suspected ACS should include a search for noncoronary causes that could explain the development of symptoms The major objectives of the physical examinations are to identify potential precipitating causes of myocardial ischemia (e.g., uncontrolled hype

16、rtension or thyrotoxicosis), evidence of other chronic disease (e.g., aortic stenosis or hypertrophic cardiomyopathy), and comorbid conditions (e.g., pulmonary disease) and to assess the hemodynamic impact of the ischemic event,11/02,12,Tools for Risk Stratification,The 12-lead ECG lies at the cente

17、r of the decision pathway for the evaluation and management of patients with ischemic discomfort. A recording made during an episode of presenting symptoms is particularly valuable. Importantly, transient ST-segment changes ( 0.05 mV) that develop during a symptomatic episode at rest and that resolv

18、e when the patient becomes asymptomatic strongly suggest acute ischemia and a very high likelihood of underlying severe CAD,11/02,13,Tools for Risk Stratification,Biomarkers are of critical importance in the evaluation of patients with UA/NSTEMI. The troponins offer great diagnostic sensitivity beca

19、use of your ability to identify patients with lesser amounts of myocardial damage. Nevertheless, these lesser amounts of damage are associated with high-risk patients with ACSs because they are thought to represent microinfarctions that result from microemboli from an unstable plaque.,11/02,14,Bioch

20、emical Cardiac Markers for Evaluation and Management of Patients Suspected of Having an ACS but Without ST- Segment Elevation on 12-Lead ECG,Point-of-Care Tests1. Cardiac troponins2. CK-MB3. Myoglobin,11/02,15,Peak A, early release of myoglobin or CK-MB isoforms after AMIPeak B, cardiac troponin aft

21、er AMIPeak C, CK-MB after AMIPeak D, cardiac troponin after unstable angina.,11/02,16,Cardiac Troponins,Advantages powerful tool for risk stratification greater sensitivity and specificity than CK-MB detection of recent MI up to 2 weeks after onset Disadvantages low sensitivity in very early phase o

22、f MI ( 6 h after symptom onset) limited ability to detect late minor reinfarction Clinical recommendations useful as a single test to efficiently diagnose NSTEMI (including minor myocardial damage), with serial measurements,11/02,17,CK-MB,Advantages rapid, cost-efficient, accurate assays ability to

23、detect early reinfarction Disadvantages loss of specificity in setting of skeletal muscle disease or injury, including surgery low sensitivity during very early MI ( 36 h) and for minor myocardial damage (detectable by troponins) Clinical recommendations prior standard and still acceptable diagnosti

24、c test in most clinical circumstances,11/02,18,Myoglobin,Advantages high sensitivity useful in early detection of MI detection of reperfusion most useful in ruling out MI Disadvantages very low specificity in setting of skeletal muscle injury or disease rapid return to normal range limits sensitivit

25、y for later presentations Clinical recommendations should not be used as only diagnostic marker because of lack of cardiac specificity,11/02,19,C. Immediate ManagementClass I - Recommendations,1. The history, physical examination, 12-lead ECG, and initial cardiac marker tests should be integrated to

26、 assign patients with chest pain to one of four categories: an noncardiac diagnosis, chronic stable angina, possible ACS, and definite ACS. 2. Patients with definite or possible ACS whose initial 12-lead ECG and cardiac marker levels are normal should be observed in facility with cardiac monitoring,

27、 and repeat ECG and cardiac marker measurement should be obtained 6 to 12 hours after the onset of symptoms,11/02,20,C. Immediate ManagementClass I Recommendations,3. In patients in whom ischemic heart disease is present or suspected, if the follow-up 12-lead ECG and cardiac marker measurements are

28、normal, a stress test (exercise or pharmacological) to provoke ischemia may be performed. Low-risk patients with a negative stress test can be managed as outpatients 4. Patients with definite ACS and ongoing pain, positive cardiac markers, new ST-segment deviations, new deep T-wave inversions, hemod

29、ynamic abnormalities, or a positive stress test should be admitted to the hospital 5. Patients with possible ACS and negative cardiac markers who are unable to exercise or who have an abnormal resting ECG should have a pharmacological stress test,11/02,21,Symptoms Suggestive of ACS,Definite ACS,No S

30、T elevation,Algorithm for the Evaluation and Managementof Patients Suspected of Having an ACS.,ST elevation,Possible ACS,Chronic Stable Angina,Noncardiac Diagnosis,Treatment as indicated byalternative diagnosis,See ACC/AHA/ACPGuidelines for ChronicStable Angina,Nondiagnostic ECGNormal Initial serumc

31、ardiac markers,ST and/or T wave changesOngoing painPositive cardiac markersHemodynamic abnormalities,ObserveFollow-up at 4-8 hours;ECG, cardiac markers,Evaluation forreperfusion therapy,See ACC/AHA Guidelines forAcute MI,No recurrent pain; Negative follow-up studies,Recurrent ischemic painor positiv

32、e follow-up studies Diagnosis of ACS confirmed,Admit to hospitalManage via acute ischemia pathway,Stress study to provoke ischemiaConsider evaluation of LV function if ischemia present(Test may be performed prior to discharge or as outpatient),Negative:Potential diagnoses:nonischemic discomfortlow-r

33、isk ACS,Positive:Diagnosis of ACSconfirmed,Arrangement for outpatientfollow-up,11/02,22,III. Hospital Care,A. Anti-ischemic Therapy B. Antiplatelet and Anticoagulation Therapy C. Risk Stratification D. Early Conservative vs. Invasive Strategies,11/02,23,Acute Ischemic Pathway,Recurrent Ischemia and/

34、orST segment shift, or Deep T-wave Inversion, or Positive cardiac markers,Early Invasive strategy,AspirinBeta-blockersNitrates Antithrombin regimen GP IIb/IIIa inhibitorMonitoring (rhythm and ischemia),Immediateangiography,12-24 hourangiography,Patientstabilizes,Recurrentsymptoms/ischemia Heart fail

35、ure Serious arrhythmia,Follow onMedical Rx,EF .40,Early Conservative strategy,Evaluate LV function,EF .40,Stress Test,Not low risk,Low risk,11/02,24,A. Anti-Ischemic TherapyClass I - Recommendations,1. Bed rest with continuous ECG monitoring for ischemia and arrhythmia detection in patients with ong

36、oing rest pain 2. Sublingual follow by intravenous nitroglycerin (NTG) for immediate relief of ischemia and associated symptoms 3. Morphine sulfate intravenously when symptoms are not immediately relieved with NTG or when acute pulmonary congestion is present 4. A beta-blocker, with the first dose a

37、dministered intravenously if there is ongoing chest pain, followed by oral administration, in the absence of contraindications,11/02,25,A. Anti-Ischemic TherapyClass I - Recommendations,5. A nondihydropyridine calcium antagonists (e.g., verapamil or diltiazem) in the absence of severe left ventricul

38、ar (LV) dysfunction or other contraindications in patients with continuing or frequent recurring ischemia when beta-blockers are contraindicated 6. And angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) when hypertension persists despite treatment with NTG and a beta-blockers in patients with LV systoli

39、c dysfunction or congestive heart failure (CHF) and in ACS patients with diabetes,11/02,26,A. Anti-Ischemic TherapyRecommendations,Class IIa 1. oral long-acting calcium antagonists for recurrent ischemia in the absence of contraindications and when beta-blockers and nitrates are fully used2. An ACEI

40、 for all post-ACS patients Class IIb 1. extended-release form of nondihydropyridine calcium antagonists instead of a beta-blocker 2. immediate-release dihydropyridine calcium antagonists in the presence of a -blocker,11/02,27,A. Anti-Ischemic TherapyRecommendations,Class III 1. NTG or other nitrates

41、 within 24 hours of sildenafil (Viagra) use 2. Immediate-released dihydropyridine calcium antagonists in the absence of a beta-blocker,11/02,28,B. Antiplatelet and Anticoagulation Therapy,Antithrombotic therapy is essential to modify the disease processes and its progression to death, myocardial inf

42、arction (MI), or recurrent MI. A combination of aspirin (ASA), clopidogrel, and unfractionated (UFH) or low molecular weight (LMWH) heparin, represents the most effective therapy. A platelet glycoprotein GP IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists should be used in patients with continuing ischemia or with oth

43、er high-risk features in whom an early invasive strategy is planned.,11/02,29,B. Antiplatelet and Anticoagulation Therapy,For patients in whom there are contraindications for ASA use, clopidogrel should be administered. In the absence of a high risk for bleeding, aspirin and clopidogrel should be ad

44、ministered prior to PCI and clopidogrel should be continued for at least one month after stenting. Aspirin should be continued for an indefinite period.,11/02,30,B. Antiplatelet and Anticoagulation Therapy,Heparin (either UFH or low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) is a key component in the antithrom

45、botic management of UA/NSTEMI. The dose of UFH should be titrated to an activated partial thromboplastin time that is 1.5 to 2.5 times control. Advantage of LMWH preparations are the ease of subcutaneous administration and the absence of a need for monitoring. Furthermore, the LMWHs stimulate platel

46、ets less than UFH does and are less frequently associated with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. However, they appear to be associated with significantly more frequent minor (but not major) bleeding,11/02,31,B. Antiplatelet and Anticoagulation Therapy,When platelets are activated, the GP IIb-IIIa re

47、ceptor undergoes a change in configuration that results in binding of fibrinogen to platelet receptors, resulting in platelet aggregation. The efficacy of GP IIb-IIIa antagonists in prevention of the complications associated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been documented in numero

48、us trials, many of which were composed entirely or in large part of patients with UA.,11/02,32,B. Antiplatelet and Anticoagulation Therapy,Trials with tirofIban and one trial with eptifibatide have also shown efficacy in UA/NSEMI patients, only some of whom underwent interventions. In PCI trials, th

49、e administration of abciximab consistently showed a significant reduction in the rate of MI and the need for urgent revascularization,11/02,33,B. Antiplatelet and Anticoagulation Therapy,Treatment with to GP IIb-IIIa blockers increase the risk of bleeding, which is typically mucocutaneous or involve

50、s the access site of vascular intervention. Blood hemoglobin and platelet counts should be monitored, and patient surveillance for bleeding should be performed daily during the administration of GP IIb/IIIa blockers,11/02,34,B. Antiplatelet and Anticoagulation TherapyClass I - Recommendations,1. Ant

51、iplatelet therapy should be initiated promptly. ASA should be administered as soon as possible after presentation and continued indefinitely 2. Clopidogrel should be administered to hospitalized patients who are unable to take ASA because of hypersensitivity or major gastrointestinal intolerance 3.

52、In hospitalized patients in whom an early non-interventional approach is planned, clopidogrel should be added to ASA as soon as possible on admission and administered for at least 1 month and for up to 9 months.,11/02,35,B. Antiplatelet and Anticoagulation TherapyClass I Recommendations,4. In patien

53、ts for whom a PCI is planned, clopidogrel should be started and continued for at least 1 month and up to 9 months in patients who are not at high risk for bleeding 5. In patients taking clopidogrel in whom CABG is planned, if possible the drug should be withheld for at least 5 days, and preferably f

54、or 7 days.,11/02,36,B. Antiplatelet and Anticoagulation TherapyClass I Recommendations,6. Anticoagulation with subcutaneous LMWH or intravenous unfractionated (UFH) should be added to antiplatelet therapy with ASA and/or clopidogrel 7. A platelet GP IIb/IIIa antagonist should be administered, in add

55、ition to ASA and heparin, to patients in whom catheterization and PCI are planned. The GP IIb/IIIa antagonist may also be administered just prior to PCI,11/02,37,B. Antiplatelet and Anticoagulation TherapyRecommendations,Class IIa 1.Enoxaparin is preferable to UFH as an anticoagulant in the absence

56、of renal failure and unless CABG is planned within 24 h. Class III 1.Intravenous fibrinolytic therapy in patients without acute ST-segment elevation, a true posterior MI, or a presumed new left-bundle-branch clock (LBBB) 2.Abciximab administration in patients in whom PCI is not planned,11/02,38,B. A

57、ntiplatelet and Anticoagulation TherapyClass III Recommendations,Intravenous Thrombolytic Therapy in Non-ST Elevation MI,11/02,39,C. Risk Stratification,The management of patients with an ACS requires continuous risk stratification. The goal of noninvasive testing are to determine the presence or ab

58、sence of ischemia in patients with a low likelihood of CAD and to estimate prognosis.,11/02,40,C. Risk Stratification,Because of simplicity, lower cost, and widespread familiarity with performance and interpretation, the standard low-level exercise ECG stress test remains the most reasonable test in

59、 patients able to exercise who have a resting ECG that is interpretable for ST-segment shifts. Patients with an ECG pattern that would interfere with interpretation of the ST segment should have an exercise test with imaging. Patients who are unable to exercise should have a pharmacological stress test with imaging.,11/02,41,C. Risk StratificationClass I - Recommendations,1. Noninvasive stress testing in low-risk patients who have been free of ischemia at rest or with low-level activity and free of CHF for a minimum of 12 to 24 hours 2. No