开车前的安全检查

1、REVIEW审核:Function部门 Signature签名 Date日期SHE 安全健康环保AUTHORIZATION 批 准:Operations Manager生产运行经理PRE-STARTUP SAFETY REVIEW (PSSR)1.0 PurposeThis procedure is intended to provide general guidance and appropriate checklist in line with DuPont S21A for conducting a Pre-startup safety review (PSSR) .2.0 ScopeS

2、ites should perform PSSR for all new( includes equipment on hire or lease ) and modified facilities for which the modification necessitates a change in the documented process technology(process technology change). Prior to startup, the PSSR team shall confirm that:- Construction and equipment are in

3、 accordance with design specifications- Elements of PSM all have been appropriately addressed- Basic safety, health, and environmental and fire-protection items have been checked via pre-prepared checklist during a physical inspection of the facility.- The facility is safe to start up, operate and m

4、aintain.3.0 DefinetionFacilityThe physical structure or area within which a given process or process segment is operated.Facility proprietorA senior member of line management( e.g., area manager, operations superintendent)Process technologyDocumentation of all knowledge and understanding of the foll

5、owing three subject areas: hazards of materials, equipment design basis, and process design basis. 4.0 ReferenceCorporate standard S21A Process Safety Management, and S25A Process Hazards Analysis.5.0 Responsibility- The project coordinator is responsible for initiating and coordinating the PSSR by

6、pulling together an appropriate review team, leading the review, and documenting the results.- The facility proprietary shall not allow startup of new or modified equipment( as mentioned above) until a PSSR is conducted per this procedure and the equipment is accepted for operation.6.0 Procedure The

7、 PSSR provides a final check of new or modified facilities to ensure that all the appropriate elements of PSM have been addressed satisfactorily, and the facility is safe to operate before introduction of hazardous chemicals to the process. The PSSR is conducted by a multidisciplined team familiar w

8、ith the operating, mechanical, technical, design, and safety requirements of the facility. A checklist helps to ensure completeness of the review. The findings shall be documented, and recommendations are acted on before hazardous chemicals are introduced to the process.6.1. Facility to be reviewed

9、is defined.6.2. The project coordinator or proprietor shall set up review team and schedule the PSSR. - The multidisciplined shall consist of manufacturing ( including operator), technical, design, maintenance( Mechanical and/or IE), and appropriate safety representative. Other personnel (constructi

10、on contractor, off-site specialists) may be included if needed.- For very minor changes, such as installation of a new drain valve and instrument transmitter bracket modifications, a smaller review team maybe consisting of two member, designated by the facility proprietor, can be used. 6.3. At the s

11、cheduled time and place, the PSSR will meet and will:- Confirm that all the appropriate people are present.- Review the scope of work that the PSSR will cover, using information such as P&I drawings electrical diagrams, equipment layouts, etc.- Review the design, using the PSSR checklist as a guide,

12、 to ensure that all relevant PSM elements have been appropriately addressed.6.4. The PSSR team will then conducted a field inspection to confirm that:- Construction and equipment is in accordance with design specification.- Basic safety, health and environmental items are checked.- The facility is s

13、afe to startup. This may be contingent upon completion of certain recommendation. The field inspection should be interactive, questioning activity whose purpose is to identify any problems with physical installation and to ensure that no potential safety problems exist at the person/equipment interf

14、aces.6.5. After field inspection, the review team reassemble and- Confirm that the inspection has been properly completed- Review PSM recommendations proposed by each team member and findings from field inspection.- Develop a plan to deal with any deficiencies and / or to re-inspect the equipment, i

15、f the team consider it is necessary.- Complete the PSSR report, and list all the recommendations which should be conducted before or after start-up.- Each member signs the PSSR report to confirm they participated in and are in agreement with the findings of the PSSR.6.6. Upon completion of the PSSR

16、and resolution of any commendations that were to be completed before startup, the facility proprietor and project coordinator will sign the PSSR report to authorize startup of the facility.6.7.Once all recommendation listed in PSSR report have been addressed, the project coordinator will close out t

17、he PSSR by signing the list as complete and the origin copy should be sent to the safety assistant to be filed in the MOC file.AttachmentsPre-Startup Safety Review check listPRE-STARTUP SAFETY REVIEW REPORTINSPECTION DATE: _DEPARTMENT/AREA: _PROJECT NO:_ TITLE/EQUIPMENT:_The PSSR team concludes that

18、 the installation is consistent with design specifications and that the equipment is safe to start-up after completion of recommendations required before start-up. (Note: If recommendations are not completed as originally intended attachment information to explain alternative solution).Approved:_ _

19、(Manufacturing) Date (Maintenance) Date _ _ (Design) Date (Technical) DateAs Appropriate: _ _ (Safety Representative) Date (Other) DatePUNCHLIST-ITEMS TO BE COMPLETED BEFORE AUTHORISATION AND START-UP:Checklist Detail Assigned to CompleteItem No. (sign./date)1. _ _ _2. _ _ _3. _ _ _4. _ _ _5. _ _ _N

20、OT TO BE SIGNED BELOW UNTIL PUNCHLIST “BEFORE STARTUP” ITEMS ARE COMPLETEDAUTHORISED: _ (Facility Proprietor) DatePUNCHLIST - ITEMS TO BE COMPLETED AFTER START-UP:Checklist Detail Assigned to CompleteItem No. (sign./date)1. _ _ _2. _ _ _3. _ _ _4. _ _ _5. _ _ _NOT TO BE SIGNED BELOW UNTIL PUNCHLIST

21、“AFTER START-UP” ITEMS ARE COMPLETEDAUTHORISED: _ (Facility Proprietor) Date PRE-START UP SAFETY REVIEW CHECKLISTC O N T E N T S PAGE No.1. SAFETY71.1. General” Safety71.2. Machinery Safety81.3. Ergonomics81.4. Occupational Health92. PROCESS SAFETY102.1. Process Tech.102.2. MOC Tech./Facilities102.3

22、. PHA112.4. QA112.5. MI112.6. Operating Procedures and Safe Work Practices122.7. Training and Performance132.8. Contractor Safety132.9. Interlocks and Alarms132.10. DP : DPO142.11. Highly Toxic Materials143. ENVIRONMENT144. COMMUNITY AWARENESS AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE (C.A.E.R.)145. ELECTRICAL SAFETY1

23、56. FIRE PROTECTION16PRE-START-UP SAFETY REVIEW CHECKLIST1.SAFETY AND HEALTH1.1“General” SafetyIs this Section Applicable?YES _NO _1.1.1Have ALL relevant personnel, (Operations, Maintenance, Technical, Supervision), received adequate and appropriate training on the equipment?N/A _YES _NO _1.1.2Has a

24、dequate and appropriate PPE (Personal Protective Equipment)been specified and provided?N/A _YES _NO _1.1.3Have measures been taken to adequately guard all dangerous parts of this equipment?N/A _YES _NO _1.1.4Has sufficient provision been made for the electrical and/or mechanical isolation of the equ

25、ipment?N/A _YES _NO _1.1.5Are points of isolation clearly marked/labelled and readily accessible?N/A _YES _NO _1.1.6Have bump/trip hazards been identified and all sharp edges removed?N/A _YES _NO _1.1.7Has proper guarding, handrails/barriers, been provided to prevent falls?N/A _YES _NO _1.1.8Have al

26、l hot/cold surfaces been adequately guarded to prevent burns?N/A _YES _NO _1.1.9Are Safety Showers and Eye Wash facilities provided and adequate?N/A _YES _NO _1.1.10Has sufficient lighting been provided so that operation, servicing, maintenance and repair of the facility can be carried out safely?N/

27、A _YES _NO _1.1.11Are display systems for providing operational instructions, safety warnings and emergency information provided and positioned so that they are clearly visible and easily read?N/A _YES _NO _1.2Machinery SafetyIs this Section Applicable?YES _NO _1.2.1Has the machinery been installed

28、so that it will be stable and secure during operation?N/A _YES _NO _1.2.2Has all access to dangerous moving parts, or danger zones created by moving equipment been prevented by the provision of the correct guards, interlocks and/or fencing?N/A _YES _NO _1.2.3Have the correct safety measures been tak

29、en to prevent any risk from hot/cold surfaces, ejection of material, failure of parts and their ejection, overheating/fire?N/A _YES _NO _1.2.4Has safe access been provided to those parts of the machinery that require operator access for operation, adjustment, service, maintenance or repair, ie. elim

30、ination of slip, trip, trap, crush, entanglement, fall, bump and cut hazards?N/A _YES _NO _1.2.5Is the machinery provided with the properly identified START/STOP and EMERGENCY controls that are positioned for safe operation without hesitation, or loss of time, and without ambiguity?N/A _YES _NO _1.2

31、.6Is the machinery provided with a clearly identified means to securely isolate it from ALL energy sources?N/A _YES _NO _1.3ErgonomicsIs this Section Applicable?YES _NO _1.3.1Has the work-station, workplace, or equipment, been constructed so that the need for stooping, bending, stretching, over-reac

32、ting and working over-head during operation has been eliminated, or reduced, to the minimum?N/A _YES _NO _1.3.2Has the need to lift, carry, push or pull, heavy loads, or parts, been eliminated as far as possible?N/A _YES _NO _1.3.3Are all display screens, dials, START/STOP/EMERGENCY buttons position

33、ed so that they are easily seen and accessible by those who will operate the equipment, or machine?N/A _YES _NO _1.3.4Have Visual Display Screens been positioned so that interference from glare is reduced to the minimum?N/A _YES _NO _1.3.5Has the work-station been designed and equipped so that a com

34、fortable position can be adopted by the operator? ie. able to stand, or change position and sit upright, angle at elbows and knees 90degs, feet on floor.N/A _YES _NO _1.3.6Does the operation of this equipment increase the risk of Upper Limb Disorder, eg. repetitive tasks, handling of loads, machine

35、paced work, and prolonged operation?N/A _YES _NO _1.3.7Have you consulted S35G guidelines for the determination of work contribution ergonomic risk factors?Intranet address:/SHE/s&oh/ergo/guidelines/msd_criteria_.pdfN/A _YES _NO _1.4Occupational HealthIs this Section Applica

36、ble?YES _NO _1.4.1Have all health risks due to gases, liquids, dusts, mists or vapours used by, contained in or emitted by this equipment been assessed, and where necessary, eliminated or adequately controlled?N/A _YES _NO _1.4.2Has adequate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) and/or Respiratory Pro

37、tective Equipment (RPE) been specified in the Operating Procedures?N/A _YES _NO _1.4.3Has the need for an Occupational Health Monitoring Programme been assessed?N/A _YES _NO _1.4.4Have Operating Procedures been reviewed to take into account any additional “hazards to health” which may arise from ope

38、ration or maintenance of this equipment?N/A _YES _NO _1.4.5Has adequate Local Exhaust Ventilation (LEV) been installed, tested, balanced and entered on an Inspection Schedule?N/A _YES _NO _1.4.6Have adequate inspection/cleaning ports been provided on all ductwork?N/A _YES _NO _1.4.7Are relief facili

39、ties directed to a safe place away from the workplace?N/A _YES _NO _1.4.8Has a Noise Survey been considered and a Noise Compliance Plan prepared, if required?N/A _YES _NO _1.4.9Has all insulation been identified and labelled?N/A _YES _NO _1.4.10Has all pipework, tanks, etc., containing hazardous mat

40、erials been adequately labelled?N/A _YES _NO _2.PROCESS SAFETY MANAGEMENT(Note that the following questions also apply to hired and leased equipment and as such appropriate information from vendors will be required).2.1Process Technology2.1.1For components, equipment and systems have PSM critical de

41、signations been documented as part of the process technology package?N/A _YES _NO _2.1.2Are up to date material safety data sheets available?N/A _YES _NO _2.1.3Have the hazardous effects of inadvertent mixing of different materials including waste streams been considered (ie. has a chemical interact

42、ion matrix been prepared/updated)?N/A _YES _NO _2.1.4Has the process design basis (eg. SOCs) been documented/updated?N/A _YES _NO _2.1.5Has the equipment design basis (eg. BPFs/P&IDs) been documented/updated?(Refer to S21A, sections A.1.2.3, B.1.2.3 for guidance).N/A _YES _NO _2.2Management of Chang

43、e Technology/Facilities2.2.1Has a management of change technology/facilities document (eg. Change of Design COD) been approved?N/A _YES _NO _2.2.2Has a test authorisation been approved?N/A _YES _NO _2.2.3Are all action items, arising from the COD, that were deemed necessary for start up, complete?N/

44、A _YES _NO _2.2.4Have all changes made during construction been recorded and authorised?N/A _YES _NO _2.3Process Hazards AnalysisIs this Section Applicable?YES _NO _2.3.1Have project PHAs been approved and a final project safety report been prepared?N/A _YES _NO _2.3.2Are all action items, deemed ne

45、cessary by the PHA team for start up, complete?N/A _YES _NO _2.3.3Has the facility been approved as “Safe to Operate” by the PHA team?N/A _YES _NO _2.4Quality AssuranceIs this Section Applicable?YES _NO _(Consult with personnel who have QA responsibilities)2.4.1Have checks and inspections been made to ensure that critical equipment is installed pr