《经济学与法律的对话》课件 3 21 17 Contract_第1页
《经济学与法律的对话》课件 3 21 17 Contract_第2页
《经济学与法律的对话》课件 3 21 17 Contract_第3页
《经济学与法律的对话》课件 3 21 17 Contract_第4页
《经济学与法律的对话》课件 3 21 17 Contract_第5页
已阅读5页,还剩25页未读 继续免费阅读

下载本文档

版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领

文档简介

IamsupposedtoremindyoutoFillouttheLSSSEWhichstandsforLawSchoolSurveyofStudentEngagement???IntellectualPropertyCopyrightislonglastingandeasytoget,patentshortandhard.Why?CopyrightisbettersuitedtobepropertybecauseItiseasiertomarkandobserveboundariesAccidentalviolationisunlikely,forthesamereasonthat…Thereisnoproblemofdepletingthecommons.ButallofthisisforprotectionagainstliteralcopyingLookandfeelandderivativeworksraisemoreofaproblemBecausetheyhavefuzzierboundariesPatentisworsesuitedtobepropertybecauseBoundariesarefuzzyandinvisiblePatentracesareevidenceofaproblemofdepletingthecommonsofideastobeinventedWhatistheRightIncentivetoCreateIP?ItdependsonthevalueproducedbytheIPPatentandcopyrightprovideanautomaticsolutiontotheproblemofsettingtherewardsinceHowmuchpeoplewillpayyoutouseitevidenceofitsvalueButtherearecoststorewardinginnovationinthatwayThedeadweightcostofmonopolypricingThetransactioncostsoftreatingideasaspropertyratherthancommonsItalsodependsonhowlongbeforesomeoneelsewouldproducethesameIPWhynotpermanentcopyrightprotection,sincenobodyelsewouldeverwritemybook?ThereisatradeoffbetweenalittlemoreincentiveandthedeadweightcostofmonopolySopatenttermshouldbeshorterthan“setrewardequaltovalueproduced”impliesTheExceptionstoCopyrightProtectionScenesafaire

MergerofideaandexpressiondoctrineIfthereisonlyoneway,orafewways,ofsayingsomethingSayingsomethinginthatwayisnotprotectedBecausecopyrightingthatwaywoulddepletethecommonsFairUseexceptionSmallinfringementscostmoretotransactoverthantheyareworthAndsomeusesarebelievedtoproducepositiveexternalitiesButthereisaproblemoffuzzybordersRequirementsforPatentProtectionNoveltyIftheideaisalreadyknownNothingofvaluehasbeenproducedNon-obviousnessIfanyonewhoneedstheideacaneasilyhiresomeonetoproduceitNotmuchofvaluehasbeenproducedUsefulness.Olddefinition:NotperniciousStory:“anewinventiontopoisonpeople,ortopromotedebauchery,ortofacilitateprivateassassination,isnotapatentableinvention”Argumentfortheolddefinition:Iftheinventorwantstowastemoneygettingapatentonsomethingnobodywantstodo,whyshouldweobject?Newdefinition:Uselessmeansnotuseful.Yet.NoreasontorewardprematureinventionOnereason:KnowingachemicalcanbesynthesizedisareasontolookforusesKitch’sProspectTheoryofPatentTherearetworeasonstogiveaprospectorrightstowhathefindsOneistorewardhim,givehimanincentivetofinditTheotheristocreateapropertyrightthatcanbeusedtobetterdevelopwhathefindsEdmundKitcharguedthatthesameappliedtopatentsAninventionrequiresfurtherdevelopment,otherinventionsThepatentholderhastheincentiveandabilitytocoordinatethatprocessJustashomesteadingturnspubliclandintoprivatepropertyMakingitpossibletoinvestinimprovingitCoordinateusesofitPatentsviewedashomesteadingideaspaceTheArgumentAgainstIntellectualPropertyInthe19thcentury,therewereseriousargumentsagainstIPSomemadebypeoplewhosawitasinconsistentwithliberalfreemarketprinciplesSwitzerlanddidnothavepatentlawuntil1907BoldrinandLevine,TheCaseAgainstIntellectualMonopolyOneargumentisthedeadweightlossofchargingwhenMCiszeroInaddition,theyarguethatpatentlawretardsinnovationJusttheoppositeofKitch’sapproach,arguingcommonsarebetterforideaspaceComputerLawIsacomputerprogramawriting?Thecourtsdisagreed,CongresssteppedintolegislatetheanswerTherightsolutionbutthewrongquestionNot“isaprogramawriting?”butDoesaprogramhavethecharacteristicsthatmakecopyrightappropriateforwritings?CleanroomreproductionofthePCROMs:Copyingwouldviolatecopyright,butindependentcreationdidn’tSotheyusedthecleanroomapproachCouldtheyhavecopiedandclaimedthescenesafairemergerexceptionTherebeingonlyonewayofwritingtheROMsthatwouldrunthePCprogramsTheDeathofCopyrightNowthatanyonecaneasilycopydigitalworksandsharethemDigitalcopyrightislargelyunenforceable.Possibleexceptions?SoftwareusedbylargeorganizationswhoseemployeescouldbetraythemforpiratingFancydigitalrightsmanagementschemestomakesharingharder,but…AnyprotectionofaworkfullyrevealedinoneuseisbrokenbytheanalogholeWhatsortofworksarenotfullyrevealedinuse?AdatabasesuchasWestlawAgamesuchasWorldofWarcraftSohowdoyougetpaidtocreateIP?Patronage–the18thcenturysolutionCharity–Patreon.Thesametechnologymakessmallscaledonationseasy.Tie-ins—webyourbooksforfree,chargeforspeechesorconsultingOtherideas?ExamplesofIPThatAlreadyWorksThatWayTheacademicworldYourrewardisinthepositionorpromotionyougetfrompublicationMoregenerallythereputationyougetOpensourcesoftwareContributingtoaprojecthelpsestablishcredentialsasaprogrammer,getsyouajobFirmsthatuseopensourcesoftwarewantanemployeewhoispartoftheprojectTheWebPutupwebpages,blogs,tospreadideas,getreputationGetpaidbyputtingadvertisementsonthemTradeSecretWhatisit?LawthatgivestheholderofatradesecretrightsagainstsomeonewhogetsitwrongfullyProvidedtheholdermadereasonableeffortstoprotectitReverseengineeringisnotwrongful.Gettinganemployeetorevealthesecretis.Whataboutaerialphotographyofafactoryunderconstruction?WhyisitNotapropertyrightNotunnecessarybecauseofpatentlawConsideritaslessofaonesizefitsallapproachthanpatentlawSupposeIbelievemyinventionwillnotbeduplicatedforahundredyearsPatentlawonlygivesmy14years(orwhateveritthenis)ofprotectionImightbeabletokeepmytradesecretforacentury.TheformulaforCocaColahasbeenatradesecretsince1891SupposeIthinkmyinventionisnon-obvious,thepatentexaminerdoesn’tConsideritasawayofmakingunpatentedinventionslesscostlytoprotectContractReputationalEnforcementInaworldwithoutlegalenforcementofcontractsIfIbreakacontract,otherpeoplewon’twanttocontractwithmeWhichisapunishment,butthatisnotwhytheyaredoingitItisasideeffectofthirdpartieswantingtoprotectthemselvesItdependsontheirknowingIwastheoneresponsibleIclaimitwasyourfaultIfthirdpartiescannoteasilytell,theyavoidbothofusSoyou,anticipatingthat,don’taccusemeofbreakingthecontractAndreputationalenforcementdoesn’tworkOnesolutionistolowertheinformationcosttothirdpartiesIfwehaveagreedinadvancetoarbitrationAlltheyhavetoknowisthearbitrator’sverdictAnotheristopostabondwithatrustedthirdpartyarbitratorIfheconcludesthatIbrokethecontract,thebondforfeitstoyouThisalsoworksagainstapartywithnoreputationtolose—perhapsaonetimetransactionProvidedthearbitratorhasareputationContractEnforcementinCyberspacePublickeyencryptionIcreateapairofkeys,longnumbersAmessageencryptedwithonecanonlybedecryptedwiththeotherImakeonekeypublic,keeptheotherprivateTosendmesecretmessages,youencryptitwithmypublickeyTodigitallysignamessage,IencryptitwithmyprivatekeyWeagreeonacontractandanarbitratorBothofusdigitallysignthecontractAnditincludesthepublickeyofthearbitratorIbreakthecontract,youappealtothearbitrator,herulesagainstmeHewritesuphisdecision,signsitusinghisprivatekeyIputthatresultonlinewithyournameonitAnyonesearchingforinformationonyoufindsitAndcanprove,bycheckingthesignaturesThatthearbitratorIagreedoninadvanceruledagainstmeThusreducingtheinformationcosttothirdpartiestonearzeroImperialChineseSolutionDesigncontractstominimizethecosttothirdpartiesofknowingwhobrokethemOwnershipgoeswithpossessionCaveatemptor—IamresponsibleforcheckinggoodswhenIbuythemPutthetemptationtobreachonthepartywithareputationalincentivenottoIfthesellercanbetrusted,payinadvanceIfthebuyercanbetrusted,payonreceiptSowhydowehavecontractlaw?TodecideifthereisacontractCourtsmaynotwishtoenforceallcontractseitherbecauseTheydonottrustindividualstoactintheirowninterest(paternalism)orTheybelievesomecontractshavelargeeffectsonthirdpartiesBecausethereisneverenoughsmallprinttocovereverythingIfthecourt’sdefaultrulesareknown,partiescanleavethingsoutUnlesstheydisagreewiththedefaultruleTheCaseforFreedomofContractCoaseTheoreminalowtransactioncostcontextAnychangethathelpsyoumorethanithurtsmeCanbecombinedwithasidepaymenttomakebothofusbetteroffUnequalbargainingpower:Whataboutamonopolyseller?ItstillpaysmetoincludefeaturesthatbenefityoumorethantheycostmeAndchargeforthemButproductcharacteristics,contractterms,canbeusedforpricediscriminationThatmightproduceaninefficientcontractorproductdesign,but…HaslittletodowithunequalbargainingpowerPriceconstraint—apartmentunderrentcontrolIfthecontrolledpriceislessthanthemarketpriceItpaysthelandlordtolowerqualityifdoingsosaveshimmoneyEvenifitisinefficientSothereisthenanargumentformandatoryterms(orabolishingrentcontrol)TheCaseAgainstFreedomofContractContractsthatimposecostsonthirdpartiesHiringahitmanContractsinrestraintoftrade—cartelagreementsContractsbypeoplenotcompetenttoactintheirowninterestChildren,lunaticsSpendthrifts?Contractsthecourtbelievescouldonlyhavebeensignedbypeoplenotcompetentto…ThatassumesthecourtcanjudgetheinterestofthepartybetterthanhecanConsiderthecaseofliquidateddamagesThecourtwillnotenforcewhatitinterpretsasapenaltyclauseLiquidateddamages>>actualdamagesButthat’sjustaprivatelynegotiatedpropertyruleActualDuressIsacontractunderliteralduressenforceable?YourmoneyoryourlifeWillyoutakeacheck?Argumentfor:Iprefermylife,whichiswhyIagreeArgumentagainst:Itmakesmuggingmoreprofitable,somoremuggingProbablyagoodargumentinthecaseofmugging,butconsiderPinochetcaseMilitarydictatoragreestogiveuppowerinexchangeforimmunityShouldthecontractbebroken?Whatisthecostoftreatingitasenforceable?Ofnotdoingso?Parolepriortothe19thcenturyPrisonersofwargavetheirparolenottotrytoescape,makesitmuchpleasanterPossiblysenthome,givetheirwordnottorejointhearmyuntilexchangedContractenforcedbysocialpressureathome,sinceIfpeoplebreakit,thenextprisonerstaysinprisonBenefit:WarislessunpleasantCost:Andtherefortherewillbemoreofit“Itiswellthatwarissoterrible,otherwiseweshouldgrowtoofondofit.”RobertE.LeeUnequalBargainingPowerasDuress?Youarelostinthedesert,IhavewaterMyprice:EverythingyouownplushalfyourincomeforeverYouarebetteroffifthatcontractisnotenforceableThatisrelevantonlywhereUnenforceabilitysubstitutesforacommitmentstrategyAwayoflimitingwhatyoucanpayinabilateralmonopolyAndeventhere,myhighpricehassomeefficiencybenefitThesupplyargumentfromthemuggingcaseturnedupsidedownItmakesitmoreworthwhilebeinginthedesertwithwaterLookingforpeopledyingofthirstWhichisagoodthingWhatcountsasduress?YourshipissinkingThetugwantstochargeyoumostofwhatitisworthYouagree.Whenyougetbacktoshore,canyourenegeonthecontract?Isthisduress?Unlikethemuggingcase,theeffectoftheincentiveisgoodThetugboatdidn’tgetyouintotheproblemAndyouwantittobetheretogetyououtWhichismorelikelythemoreitcanchargeAswiththewaterinthedesertcaseWhatistheefficientpriceforsavingtheship?CoaseatSeaWhatistheefficientpriceforsavingtheship?Thepricethatgivesthetugboattherightincentivetobeoutthere?Thepricethatgivesyoutherightincentivenottogooutinbadweather?Onepricecan’tbeoptimalforbothmarginsThisisCoase’sdualcausationproblemTheshipownercankeeptheshipfromsinkingbynotgoingoutinastormThetugboatownercankeeptheshipfromsinkingbygoingoutinthestormEithermight,inaparticularsituation,betheleastcostavoiderBargainingoveranenforceablecontractonasinkingshipIsabilateralmonopolygameBargainingbreakdownmeanstheshipsinksWhichisanargumentagainstanenforceablecontractEitherhavethesalvagepricesetbytheadmiraltycourtorBargainedinadvancebetweentheshipownerandthetugownerContractsofAdhesionOnesidesetstheterms,theotherstakesitorleavesitAslongasoneorthetermsbeingsetisthepricethecontractisstillefficientSoconstraintsonwhatthecourtwillenforcemakebothpartiesworseoffWhydoesAvisnotbargainovereachcontract?ThatwouldincreasetransactioncostsAndmakeiteasierfortheiremployeestocheatthem,acceptbribesforbettertermsIsthereacontract?FormalitiessoweandthecourtknowifthereisThedoctrineofconsiderationMyrichuncleofferstopaymyexpensesatHarvard,thenchangeshismindNoconsideration,sonocontract?ButthedoctrineofdetrimentalreliancemightsavemeLostcatsIpostarewardoffer,youfindthecatandreturnit,notknowingoftherewardWhenyoufindout,canyoucollectit?Ifyoucan,Iwillbelesslikelytopostareward,but…Ifyouseealostcatyouwillbemorelikelytotrytolocatetheowner,becausetheremightbearewardMedicalservicesforanunconsciousvictimChargingforthemisanegativePigouviantaxWedon’tusuallyhavethoseforservices,becauseapropertyruleworksbetterButifIamunconsciousIcan’tagreetohireyouHowshouldacourtfillinmissingterms?FigureoutwhatthepartieswouldhaveagreedtoBecausethosearetheefficientterms,andDoingitthatwayreducestheneedtowriteamoredetailedcontractAllocatingRiskIfsomethinggoeswrongdevelopingmyfilmMakeWalgreen’sliableforlosingmyfilmBecausetheycanspreadtheriskovermanytransactionsAndIamriskaverseWhatifthephotographerknowsthesefilmsareunusuallyvaluable?MakethephotographerliableSinceheknowsthesefilmsareespeciallyvaluableAndsoneedtobetreatedwithspecialcareFurther,ifWalgreen’sisliableandknew,theywouldn’tagreesaveatahigherpriceSinceitiscostlytothemtotakespecialcarewithonebatchoffilmOrtopayyourhundredthousanddollardamageawardAspecialistlabcouldhandlethisbatchatlowercostLetthepartywhoknowstheriskbeliableTheneachpartyknowswhetherthecontractisworthsigningEconomicsofinsurance:RiskAversion,MoralHazard,AdverseSelectionNoteformillenials”Film”isadeviceforstoringgraphicinformationAsortofanalogflashdisk

RulesforBreachSomecontractsshouldbebreachedWhencircumstanceschange,suchthatPerformancenowresultsinanetlossWhatrulesgivetherightincentivesTobreachwhenperformingisanetnegativeTosignacontractwhendoingsoisanetpositiveFordecisionsduringperformanceDoIbearcoststhatareawasteifthecontractgetsbreached?Thatdependsonwho,incaseofbreach,paysforthemIntheusualcontextofindividualsactingintheirowninterestWhichdependsonwhathappensifthereisabreachAndpossiblyonbargainingAlternativeRulesNodamages:Ifprofitgoesnegativeforme,Ibreach,evenifnetprofitforbothofusisstillpositiveThatmightbeavoidedbyrenegotiatingthecontractButthatopensupthepossibilityofcontinuousexpensiverenegotiationsSpecificperformance:NobreachwithoutpermissionNowyoudon’tbreachevenwhendoingsoisefficientBut…againbargainingcansolvethatproblemExpectationdamages:Makethevictimaswelloffasifyouhadn’tbreachedGivesefficientbreachSinceitonlypaysmetobreachifmygainislargerthanyourlossReliancedamages:Makethevictimaswelloffasifhehadn’tsignedthecontractGivesefficientsigningwhenonepartyknowsmoreabouttheriskofhavingtobreachButinefficientreliance.Ibuildthenewfact

温馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
  • 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
  • 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
  • 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
  • 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

评论

0/150

提交评论