【ACT】解读强化ACT成绩-Interpreting Scores on the Enhanced ACT Guidance for K-12 and Higher Education Institutions_第1页
【ACT】解读强化ACT成绩-Interpreting Scores on the Enhanced ACT Guidance for K-12 and Higher Education Institutions_第2页
【ACT】解读强化ACT成绩-Interpreting Scores on the Enhanced ACT Guidance for K-12 and Higher Education Institutions_第3页
【ACT】解读强化ACT成绩-Interpreting Scores on the Enhanced ACT Guidance for K-12 and Higher Education Institutions_第4页
【ACT】解读强化ACT成绩-Interpreting Scores on the Enhanced ACT Guidance for K-12 and Higher Education Institutions_第5页
已阅读5页,还剩17页未读 继续免费阅读

下载本文档

版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领

文档简介

InterpretingScoresonthe

EnhancedACT:GuidanceforK-12andHigherEducationInstitutions

JamesRiddlesperger

ACTStateandFederalPolicy

©2025byACTEducationCorp.Allrightsreserved.

ACTState&FederalPolicy|InterpretingScoresontheEnhancedACT1

©2025byACTEducationCorp.Allrightsreserved.

EnhancingtheACT

Lastyear,ACTannouncedaseriesofenhancementsdesignedtomodernizetheACTtest

andofferstudentsmorechoiceandflexibilityindemonstratingtheirreadinessforlifeafterhighschool.Theenhancementsprovidestudentsmoreflexibilitybyallowingthemto

choosewhethertotakethescienceassessment,therebyreducingthetestlengthbyuptoone-third.Statesanddistrictsthatadministeraschool-dayACTarealsogivenmore

flexibility:theycanchoosetooffertheACTwithorwithoutscience,astheycurrently

chooseforwriting.Whenscienceandwritingarepartoftheiradministration,theyhavethechoicetoadministerthosesectionsonaseparatedayfromthethreecoresectionsof

English,mathematics,andreading.

Weseektocreatea

fairer,moreaccessible

experiencewhile

preservingtheACT’s

historicroleasa

nationallyrecognized

measureofacademic

achievementandcollegereadiness.

Theseupdatesaddressfeedbackfromeducatorsand

researchersaboutbalancingefficiencyandaccuracyinlarge-scaleassessments.Byreducingtestfatigueandsimplifyingcertainelementsoftheassessment,weseektocreatea

fairer,moreaccessibleexperiencewhilepreservingtheACT’shistoricroleasanationallyrecognizedmeasureofacademicachievementandcollegereadiness.Wehavemadethese

enhancementswhilemaintainingthetest’sreliability,predictivevalidity,andalignmentwithstateacademicstandards.

Inpreparationforthelaunchoftheenhancements,werecentlypublishedtechnical

documentationdetailingthetestdevelopmentprocessandthedataanalysesusedto

verifythattheACTcontinuestobeapowerfultoolformeasuringcollegereadiness

.1

Thisbriefservesasaguideforstakeholdersinsecondaryandhighereducationtotwokey

findingsoftheseanalyses:

1.Wedevelopedthetestenhancementstoensurethesectionscoresonthelegacy

ACTareinterchangeablewithsectionscoresontheenhancedACT.Asaresult,wedonotanticipateaneedforstatesorotherinstitutionstorevisittheuseofACTsectionscoresindecision-making.

2.TheCompositescoreontheenhancedACTwillbecalculatedusingEnglish,math,andreadingsectionscores(referredtohereafterwiththeshorthand“EMR”).ThisCompositescorecanbeusedinterchangeablywiththeCompositescoreonthe

legacyACT,whichiscalculatedwiththeEnglish,math,reading,andsciencescores(referredtohereafterwiththeshorthand“EMRS”),thoughtherearesomepracticaldifferencesinthetwoscores.Itisexpectedthatthescoreswilldifferforsome

1InitialEvidenceSupportingInterpretationsofScoresfromtheEnhancedACTTestsummarizessomeoftheevidencesupportinginterpretationsofthescoresfromtheenhancedACT.TheEnhancedACTLinkingStudyReportfocusesonpsychometricanalysesandfindingsfromtheJune2024linkingstudy.

ACTState&FederalPolicy|InterpretingScoresontheEnhancedACT2

©2025byACTEducationCorp.Allrightsreserved.

students,andindividualstudentdifferencescouldresultinslightlydifferentscoredistributions.Formostuses,thesedifferencesareofasimilarmagnitudetowhatstakeholderswouldexperiencewiththeannualvariationtheyseeinCompositescoredistributions.

Thesefindingsaredetailedbelow.Inthefollowingdiscussion,the“legacy”ACTreferstotheversionofthetestthatisbeingphasedoutoverthe2025-26calendaryears,andthe

“enhanced”ACTreferstotheupdated,shortenedACTtestexperience.Additionalinformationabouttheenhancementsisavailableonourwebsite

.2

DesigningtheEnhancements

TheACTEnhancementsprovidemoreflexibilityforstudents,states,anddistricts.

UnderlyingtheACTtestisthebeliefthatstudents’

preparationforcollegeandtheworkplaceisbestassessed

bymeasuring,asdirectlyaspossible,theskillslearnedin

highschoolthatarerequiredforsuccessinfirst-yearcollege-levelcourses.Therequiredacademicskillscanbeassessedmostdirectlybyreproducingthecomplexityofthework

studentscompleteinhighschoolandareexpectedtocompleteincollegeinthe

classroom.Therefore,theACTisdesignedtodeterminehowskillfullystudentssolve

problems,graspimpliedmeanings,drawinferences,evaluateideas,andmakejudgmentsinsubjectmatterareasimportanttosuccessincollege.ThesephilosophicalfoundationsoftheACTtestarenotchangingwiththeenhancements.

Ashappenedafterotherperiodicreviews,externalexpertpanelswerebroughttogethertoevaluatetheproposedchangestothelegacyACTandtoevaluatetheknowledgeandskillstestedbytheACT.Weconductedaseparatepanelforeachtestsection,withreviewers

chosenbecauseoftheirknowledge,expertise,andexperience.Thesepanelsalsoevaluatedthealignmentofspecificationsandblueprintstoseveralstatehighschoolstandardsfor

ELA,math,andscience.Additionally,ourTechnicalAdvisoryCouncil(TAC)evaluateddraftandfinalversionsoftheenhancedACTblueprintsandspecificationstovalidatethattheassessmentwillcontinuetopredictcollegeandcareerreadiness.Fulldetailsaboutthe

changesmadetotestspecificationsandblueprintscanbefoundintheforthcoming“DesignFrameworkfortheEnhancedACTTest.”

LinkingtheEnhancedandLegacyACTTests

In2024,afterthenewformsoftheenhancedACThadbeenconstructed,weconducteda“linking”studytoensurethattheenhancedACTmeasuresthesameskillsandknowledgeasthelegacyACTwhilemaintaininghighstandardsofaccuracy,fairness,andconsistentscoreinterpretation.ThestudyusedalargerepresentativesampleofACTtesttakerswhowererandomlyassignedtotakeeitherthelegacyACTtestformoroneofthetwo

2ACTTestEnhancements|ACT

ACTState&FederalPolicy|InterpretingScoresontheEnhancedACT3

©2025byACTEducationCorp.Allrightsreserved.

enhancedACTforms.TheresultsconfirmedthatsectiontestscoresfromtheenhancedACTareinterchangeablewiththosefromthelegacyACT.

ThefindingsaffirmthattheenhancedACTprovidesareliableandvalidmeasureof

students’academicreadiness,supportingconsistentinterpretationanduseofscores

acrosseducationalcontexts.Asaresult,wedonotanticipateaneedforstatesorother

institutionstochangetheiruseofACTsectiontestscoresindecision-making.Forexample,performancelevelsthatweresetthroughastandard-settingprocessesandotherACT

sectioncutscorescancontinuetobeused.

Reducedtestlengthhadminoreffectsonprecisionanddidnotaffecttheconstructsmeasured

OneofthemaindifferencesbetweenthelegacyACTandtheenhancedACTisthatthe

enhancedversionhasfewerquestionsandashortertestingtimebutmoretimeper

question.Thischangeaimstoreducetestfatigueandimprovethetestingexperience.

However,suchmodificationscouldpotentiallyresultinchangestotheconstructs

measuredinthetestsectionsandreducedscoreprecision.Thesefactorswereevaluatedaspartofthecognitivelabsandexternalpanelreviewsdescribedabove.Then,ouranalysesin

0.94

0.88

0.88

0.93

0.88

0.88

0.89

0.84

0.83

0.89

0.85

0.85

0.97

0.94

0.94

1.00

0.90

0.80

0.70

0.60

0.50

0.40

0.30

0.20

0.10

0.00

Reliability

LegacyFormEnhancedForm1EnhancedForm2

2.66

2.75

1.58

2.23

2.26

1.43

1.92

1.94

2.22

1.88

2.22

2.25

1.03

1.32

1.35

2.5

2

1.5

1

0.5

StandardErrorofMeasurement

3

0

aLegacyFormEnhancedForm1uEnhancedForm2

Figure1.ReliabilityandStandardErrorofMeasurementfortheLegacyand

EnhancedFormsoftheACTNotethattwoseparateformsoftheenhancedACTwereusedinthelinkingstudy,andeachisshowninthefigure.

ACTState&FederalPolicy|InterpretingScoresontheEnhancedACT4

©2025byACTEducationCorp.Allrightsreserved.

thelinkingstudyensured

thattheconstruct

equivalencerequiredfor

effectivelinkingwasmet

empirically;thelinkingstudyisdescribedbelowandinfulldetailin“TheEnhancedACTLinkingStudyReport.

”3

Toensurethatthischangedidnotaffecttheconstructsbeingmeasuredineachtestsection,weconducted

confirmatoryfactoranalysesusingvariousmodels.The

resultsoftheseanalyses

Form

Mean

Standard

Deviation

English

LegacyForm

20.68

6.31

EnhancedForm1

20.78

6.40

EnhancedForm2

20.76

6.44

Math

Reading

Science

LegacyForm

20.85

5.44

EnhancedForm1

20.84

5.60

EnhancedForm2

LegacyForm

20.93

22.44

5.57

6.59

EnhancedForm1

22.37

6.67

EnhancedForm2

LegacyForm

22.41

21.76

6.71

5.74

EnhancedForm1

21.79

5.73

EnhancedForm2

21.78

5.83

Table1.ScaleScoreDescriptiveStatistics

showedconsistencyintheconstructequivalenceofmeasurement,withfitindicesand

factorloadingsoftheenhancedACTformssimilartothoseofthelegacyACTform.Inotherwords,theanalysesshowedthatthelegacyandenhancedtestsectionsmeasurethesameunderlyingacademicskills.Asanticipated,reducingthenumberofquestionsdidleadtoasmalldecreaseinreliabilityandasmallincreaseinthestandarderrorofmeasurement.

However,thesechangeswereminorandwellwithinacceptableindustrystandards.In

particular,thereliabilityofeverysectiontestremainedwellover0.80.Thisresultindicatesthat,overall,thetestenhancementsdonotfundamentallychangetheaccuracyofthe

scores.

SectionscoresfromtheenhancedACTareinterchangeablewithsectionscoresfromthelegacyACT

AfterestablishingthatthelegacyandenhancedACTtestsweresufficientlysimilar,we

linkedtheenhancedtesttothelegacytestusingawell-establishedmethodologyknownasIRTtrue-scoreequating.Threesignificantfindingsemergedfromthispartofthestudy:

StatesandotherinstitutionswillnotneedtorevisithowtheyinterpretACTsection

scoresfordecision-makingandaccountability.

•Wecomparedthedifficultyofquestionsonthe

enhancedandlegacyformstoensurethattheenhancedformsmetthetestspecifications.Theanalysisconfirmedthattheenhancedformsdidmeettestspecificationsandthatslightdifferencesindifficultydidnotimpactthe

comparabilityofthescoresbetweentheforms.

3TheEnhancedACTLinkingStudyReport

ACTState&FederalPolicy|InterpretingScoresontheEnhancedACT5

©2025byACTEducationCorp.Allrightsreserved.

•Thelinkingresultsledtonearlyidenticalscoredistributionsofthelegacyandenhancedforms,meaningthatscoresrepresentthesamelevelofachievementbetweenthe

legacyandenhancedforms,asshowninTable1.

•Theresultsofpopulationinvarianceevaluationshowedconsistencybetweenlegacyandenhancedforms,indicatingthelinkingresultsarerobust.

Together,thesefindingsshowthattheenhancedACTmaintainsconsistentmeasurementpropertieswiththelegacyACT,andsectionscoresontheenhancedACTare

interchangeablewithsectionscoresonthelegacyACT,allowingfordirectcomparisonbetweenstudentscoresoneachofthetwoassessments.Therefore,statesandotherinstitutionswillnotneedtorevisithowtheyinterpretACTsectionscoresfordecision-makingandaccountability.

UnderstandingtheNewCompositeScoreCalculation

GivingstudentstheflexibilityofanoptionalsciencesectionrequiredustochangethewaywecalculatetheACTCompositescore.OnthelegacyACT,theCompositescoreisthe

roundedaverageofthestudent’sscoresontheEnglish,math,reading,andscience

sections(“EMRS”).OntheenhancedACT,theCompositescoreistheroundedaverageof

theEnglish,math,andreadingsectionscores(“EMR”).Thesciencesectionscoreandthe

STEMscore(averageofscienceandmathematicssectionscores)willcontinuetobe

reportedforstudentswhotakethesciencetest.WhilethesciencescorewillnolongerbeincludedintheCompositecalculation,itremainsavaluableindicatorofstudents’scientificreasoningskillsandpreparednessforSTEM-relatedfields,andorganizationsmaycontinuetoconsiderscienceandSTEMscoresforadmissionsandscholarshipdecisions.

LegacyCompositeScore(“EMRS”)NewCompositeScore(“EMR”)

English,math,andreadingtests

English,math,reading,andsciencetests

Table2.LegacyandNewCompositeScoreCalculations

BecausetheCompositescoreisameasureofgeneralacademicreadinessthatplaysavitalpartindecision-makingformanyinstitutions,itisimportanttounderstandthepropertiesofthenewEMRCompositescoreanditsrelationshiptothelegacyEMRSversion.Our

investigationintothesechangesissummarizedbelow.Fulldetailscanbefoundinthe

technicalreport:“InitialEvidenceSupportingInterpretationsofScoresfromtheEnhancedACTTest.

”4

OuranalysesdemonstratethattheCompositescoresfromtheenhancedACTcanbeusedinterchangeablywiththelegacyCompositescoresforthesamepurposes.In

4InitialEvidenceSupportingInterpretationsofScoresfromtheEnhancedACTTest

ACTState&FederalPolicy|InterpretingScoresontheEnhancedACT6

©2025byACTEducationCorp.Allrightsreserved.

addition,therearesomepracticaldifferencesbetweenthedistributionsofthetwoscoresthatinstitutionsshouldanticipate,whicharediscussedbelow.

LegacyACT

EnhancedACT

Composite

Composite

(EMRS)

(EMR)

14

14

15

15

16

16

17

17

18

18

19

19

20

20

21

21

22

22

23

23

24

24

25

25

26

26

27

27

28

28

29

29

30

30

31

31

32

32

33

33

34

34

35

35

36

36

TheCompositeScoreCalculationsareInterchangeable

Ourresearchhasdeterminedthat,exceptforverylowCompositescores,theEMRSandEMRscoresconcordwitheachotherpointforpoint.Thatis,whenwe

establishedanequipercentilescoreconcordance

betweentheEMRandEMRSCompositescores,theclosestEMRscoretoanyEMRSscoreabove13isthesamescore.ThesameanalysisshowsthattheEMR

scoreisanear-perfectpredictoroftheEMRSscore,

withacorrelationof0.99.Forthisreason,no

conversionbetweenlegacyACTCompositescores

andenhancedACTCompositescoresisneeded,andwewillreportEMRS-andEMR-calculatedCompositescoresasinterchangeablewitheachother.Inall

officialscorereporting,astudentwillonlyreceiveoneCompositescore,andtherewillbenolabelindicatingwhetheritisEMRorEMRS.Stakeholderscan

determinetheCompositescoreversionbasedonthetestdate—onlineNationaltestadministrations

startinginApril2025andalltestadministrationsbeginninginSeptember2025willreportthenewEMRcompositescore

.

OuranalysesconfirmedtheappropriatenessofusingCompositescoresfordecision-makingbecausetheEMRandEMRSCompositescoreshavenearly

identicalpredictivepowerwhenitcomestostudentsuccessincollege.Infact,asshowninFigure2,thecorrelationsbetweenCompositescoreandcollegeoutcomes(first-yearGPA,likelihoodofearninga

Table3.ConcordancebetweenLegacyandEnhanced

CompositeScores5

bachelor’sdegree,andlikelihoodofearninganydegree)wereidenticalfortheEMRSscoreobtainedfromthelegacyACTandforEMRobtainedfromasimulatedenhancedACT.

(NotethatthesimulationaccountedfortheenhancedACT’sshortertestlength).

5NotethatconcordanceestimatesforEMRSscoresbelow14werenotobtainedbecausethecumulativefrequencyofscoreswaslessthan50inthatscorerange,resultinginunreliableestimates.

ACTState&FederalPolicy|InterpretingScoresontheEnhancedACT7

©2025byACTEducationCorp.Allrightsreserved.

.35.35

LegacyACTEMRS

SimulatedEnhancedACTEMR

.43.43

.40.40

First-YearEarnedEarnedAny

CollegeBachelor'sDegree

GPADegreeN=116,918

N=1,111,776N=116,918

Figure2.CorrelationsofEMRSandEMR

CompositeScoreswithFirst-YearCollegeGPAandDegreeAttainment

Similarly,Figure3shows

thattheEMRSandEMR

CompositescorescorrelatewithhighschoolGPAandtheACTRigorIndex,whichisameasurethatcanbe

usedtocomparestudents,courseperformancefairlyacrossdifferentcourseworktaken,atlevelsnearly

identicaltoeachother.

Therefore,wewillreporttheEMRandEMRSCompositescoresinterchangeably,andtheevidenceshould

encouragestakeholderstocontinuetousethe

Compositescoreasthey

haveinthepast.Inaddition,thecurrentACT-SAT

concordancecancontinuetobeused

.6

LegacyACTEMRS

EnhancedACTEMR

.56

.54

.48

.50

HighSchoolGPARigorIndex

Figure3.CorrelationsofEMRSandEMR

CompositeScoreswith

HighSchoolGPAandtheACTRigorIndex.7

PracticalImplicationsoftheNewCompositeScoreCalculation

AlthoughourresearchprovidesastrongbasisforusingtheEMRCompositescore

interchangeablywiththeEMRSCompositescore,therearesomepracticalconsiderationsthatstakeholdersshouldunderstand

.

First,therewillbeatransitionperiodinwhichsometest-takersreceiveanEMRCompositescore,andothersreceiveanEMRSCompositescore.Inthespringof2025,mostjuniorswill

6ACTrecommendsstakeholderscontinuetousetheACT/SATConcordancetoalign:

•ACTCompositescoreswithSATTotalscores

•ACTmathscoreswithSATmathscores

•ACTEnglish+readingscoreswithSATreading/writingscores

Whileformalprogressonupdatingtheconcordancehasnotyetbegun,ACTresearchersarepreparedto

collaboratewithCollegeBoardcounterpartswhenthetimingisappropriate,shoulditbedeterminedthatanupdateisnecessary.AreviewandupdateoftheconcordancebetweenACTandSATscoreswouldrequire

sufficientdatafromstudentswhohavetakenboththeenhancedACTandthedigitalSAT.

7Notethatthedifferencesdonotreachthestandardp<.05leveloftenusedasathresholdforstatisticalsignificance.

ACTState&FederalPolicy|InterpretingScoresontheEnhancedACT8

©2025byACTEducationCorp.Allrightsreserved.

receiveanEMRSCompositescore

,8

whereaswewill

beginreportingEMR

CompositescoresforallexamineesinSeptember

2025.Forthisreason,weanticipatethattheACT-testedgraduatingclassof

2025willnearlyuniversallyhaveEMRS-calculated

Compositescores,theACT-

GraduatingClass

Year

Projected

Percentageof

Graduateswith

EMRScore

Projected

Percentageof

Graduateswith

EMRSScore

2025

0.3%

99.7%

2026

33.5%

66.5%

2027

98.9%

1.1%

Table4.ProjectedShareofEMRandEMRSCompositeScoresbyGraduatingClassYear

testedgraduatingclassof2026willhaveamixofEMR-calculatedandEMRS-calculated

Compositescores,andtheACT-testedgraduatingclassof2027willnearlyuniversallyhaveEMR-calculatedscores.Projectionsbasedonhistoricalgraduatingclassdatausinga

student’slastACTscoreareprovidedinTable4.InstitutionsofhighereducationwilllikelyseeagreaterproportionofEMRscoresfortheclassof2026thanthoseprojectedhere

becausestudentswhoapplytocollegearemorelikelytotaketheACTmorethanonce,

makingtheirmostrecenttest(andalsoSuperscore

9)

likelytobethenewEMRCompositescore.

ThesecondpracticalconsiderationisthatweanticipateaslightincreaseinthenumberofstudentswhowillscoreatthebottomoftheCompositescoredistribution.Becauseofthis,weanticipatethataverageACTCompositescoreswilldeclinebyapproximately0.1to0.4

pointsformostpopulations,asshowninFigure4.Itisimportanttonotethatthe

anticipateddeclines,thoughrealinthesensethattheymayhaveactualconsequences,areofamagnitudethatiswellwithintherangeofnormalannualvariationoftheComposite

score.Further,ifallstudentstookthesciencetest,wewouldexpectmorethan90%tohaveanEMRCompositescorethatiswithinonepointofwhattheirEMRSCompositescore

wouldhavebeenifthelegacyCompositescorewerereported.

Outofadesiretofullysupportinstitutionsinorganizationalplanning,weareproviding

supplementalreportstohighereducationinstitutionsthatreceiveACTscoresthatwillhelpthemunderstandandplanforanyminorimpactsfromthechangeinCompositescore

calculation.Thereportsshowaprojectionofthenumberofstudentsatoraboveeachscore

8OnlyexamineeswhotaketheACTNational(Saturday)onlineteststartinginApril2025willreceivethenew

EMR-calculatedCompositescore.AllotherexamineesinSpring2025willtakethelegacyACTandwillreceiveanEMRS-calculatedComposite.

9TheACTSuperscorewillnolongerincludethesciencescoreafterthetransitiontothenewEMR-calculated

Compositescore.WhengeneratingtheACTSuperscorereport,wewilluseastudent'sbestscorefromeach

section,regardlessofwhichversionofthetestthatsectionscorecamefrom.Thereportwillstilldisplaythe

highestscienceandSTEMscoresifthestudenthastakenthesciencesection.Ifnot,thereportwillshow"-/-"forthatsection.

ACTState&FederalPolicy|InterpretingScoresontheEnhancedACT9

©2025byACTEducationCorp.Allrightsreserved.

pointforthenewEMRCompositescore

alongsidehistoricaldatashowingthelegacy

EMRSCompositescore.Thisinformationcanbeusedtoassesspotentialimpactstoexisting

programsbasedon

Compositescorecutoffs.

AdditionalResources

Tosupportstakeholders

withinformationabout

thetransitiontothe

enhancedACT,several

EMR21.4

22.621.3

EMRS

22.4

21.621.3

19.2

19.418.0

18.3

June2024

EnhancedACT

Spring2024SchoolDay

2024High

SchoolCohort

2022College

Enrollees

20224-YearCollege

Enrollees

Figure4.AverageACTCompositeScore,SelectedPopulations

resourcesareavailablethroughtheACTTestEnhancementssectionofACT.org.

•PracticeTests:Wehavereleasedtimedanduntimedpracticetestsalignedtothenewtestbluep

温馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
  • 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
  • 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
  • 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
  • 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

评论

0/150

提交评论