版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领
文档简介
InterpretingScoresonthe
EnhancedACT:GuidanceforK-12andHigherEducationInstitutions
JamesRiddlesperger
ACTStateandFederalPolicy
©2025byACTEducationCorp.Allrightsreserved.
ACTState&FederalPolicy|InterpretingScoresontheEnhancedACT1
C·
©2025byACTEducationCorp.Allrightsreserved.
EnhancingtheACT
Lastyear,ACTannouncedaseriesofenhancementsdesignedtomodernizetheACTtest
andofferstudentsmorechoiceandflexibilityindemonstratingtheirreadinessforlifeafterhighschool.Theenhancementsprovidestudentsmoreflexibilitybyallowingthemto
choosewhethertotakethescienceassessment,therebyreducingthetestlengthbyuptoone-third.Statesanddistrictsthatadministeraschool-dayACTarealsogivenmore
flexibility:theycanchoosetooffertheACTwithorwithoutscience,astheycurrently
chooseforwriting.Whenscienceandwritingarepartoftheiradministration,theyhavethechoicetoadministerthosesectionsonaseparatedayfromthethreecoresectionsof
English,mathematics,andreading.
Weseektocreatea
fairer,moreaccessible
experiencewhile
preservingtheACT’s
historicroleasa
nationallyrecognized
measureofacademic
achievementandcollegereadiness.
Theseupdatesaddressfeedbackfromeducatorsand
researchersaboutbalancingefficiencyandaccuracyinlarge-scaleassessments.Byreducingtestfatigueandsimplifyingcertainelementsoftheassessment,weseektocreatea
fairer,moreaccessibleexperiencewhilepreservingtheACT’shistoricroleasanationallyrecognizedmeasureofacademicachievementandcollegereadiness.Wehavemadethese
enhancementswhilemaintainingthetest’sreliability,predictivevalidity,andalignmentwithstateacademicstandards.
Inpreparationforthelaunchoftheenhancements,werecentlypublishedtechnical
documentationdetailingthetestdevelopmentprocessandthedataanalysesusedto
verifythattheACTcontinuestobeapowerfultoolformeasuringcollegereadiness
.1
Thisbriefservesasaguideforstakeholdersinsecondaryandhighereducationtotwokey
findingsoftheseanalyses:
1.Wedevelopedthetestenhancementstoensurethesectionscoresonthelegacy
ACTareinterchangeablewithsectionscoresontheenhancedACT.Asaresult,wedonotanticipateaneedforstatesorotherinstitutionstorevisittheuseofACTsectionscoresindecision-making.
2.TheCompositescoreontheenhancedACTwillbecalculatedusingEnglish,math,andreadingsectionscores(referredtohereafterwiththeshorthand“EMR”).ThisCompositescorecanbeusedinterchangeablywiththeCompositescoreonthe
legacyACT,whichiscalculatedwiththeEnglish,math,reading,andsciencescores(referredtohereafterwiththeshorthand“EMRS”),thoughtherearesomepracticaldifferencesinthetwoscores.Itisexpectedthatthescoreswilldifferforsome
1InitialEvidenceSupportingInterpretationsofScoresfromtheEnhancedACTTestsummarizessomeoftheevidencesupportinginterpretationsofthescoresfromtheenhancedACT.TheEnhancedACTLinkingStudyReportfocusesonpsychometricanalysesandfindingsfromtheJune2024linkingstudy.
ACTState&FederalPolicy|InterpretingScoresontheEnhancedACT2
C·
©2025byACTEducationCorp.Allrightsreserved.
students,andindividualstudentdifferencescouldresultinslightlydifferentscoredistributions.Formostuses,thesedifferencesareofasimilarmagnitudetowhatstakeholderswouldexperiencewiththeannualvariationtheyseeinCompositescoredistributions.
Thesefindingsaredetailedbelow.Inthefollowingdiscussion,the“legacy”ACTreferstotheversionofthetestthatisbeingphasedoutoverthe2025-26calendaryears,andthe
“enhanced”ACTreferstotheupdated,shortenedACTtestexperience.Additionalinformationabouttheenhancementsisavailableonourwebsite
.2
DesigningtheEnhancements
TheACTEnhancementsprovidemoreflexibilityforstudents,states,anddistricts.
UnderlyingtheACTtestisthebeliefthatstudents’
preparationforcollegeandtheworkplaceisbestassessed
bymeasuring,asdirectlyaspossible,theskillslearnedin
highschoolthatarerequiredforsuccessinfirst-yearcollege-levelcourses.Therequiredacademicskillscanbeassessedmostdirectlybyreproducingthecomplexityofthework
studentscompleteinhighschoolandareexpectedtocompleteincollegeinthe
classroom.Therefore,theACTisdesignedtodeterminehowskillfullystudentssolve
problems,graspimpliedmeanings,drawinferences,evaluateideas,andmakejudgmentsinsubjectmatterareasimportanttosuccessincollege.ThesephilosophicalfoundationsoftheACTtestarenotchangingwiththeenhancements.
Ashappenedafterotherperiodicreviews,externalexpertpanelswerebroughttogethertoevaluatetheproposedchangestothelegacyACTandtoevaluatetheknowledgeandskillstestedbytheACT.Weconductedaseparatepanelforeachtestsection,withreviewers
chosenbecauseoftheirknowledge,expertise,andexperience.Thesepanelsalsoevaluatedthealignmentofspecificationsandblueprintstoseveralstatehighschoolstandardsfor
ELA,math,andscience.Additionally,ourTechnicalAdvisoryCouncil(TAC)evaluateddraftandfinalversionsoftheenhancedACTblueprintsandspecificationstovalidatethattheassessmentwillcontinuetopredictcollegeandcareerreadiness.Fulldetailsaboutthe
changesmadetotestspecificationsandblueprintscanbefoundintheforthcoming“DesignFrameworkfortheEnhancedACTTest.”
LinkingtheEnhancedandLegacyACTTests
In2024,afterthenewformsoftheenhancedACThadbeenconstructed,weconducteda“linking”studytoensurethattheenhancedACTmeasuresthesameskillsandknowledgeasthelegacyACTwhilemaintaininghighstandardsofaccuracy,fairness,andconsistentscoreinterpretation.ThestudyusedalargerepresentativesampleofACTtesttakerswhowererandomlyassignedtotakeeitherthelegacyACTtestformoroneofthetwo
2ACTTestEnhancements|ACT
ACTState&FederalPolicy|InterpretingScoresontheEnhancedACT3
C·
©2025byACTEducationCorp.Allrightsreserved.
enhancedACTforms.TheresultsconfirmedthatsectiontestscoresfromtheenhancedACTareinterchangeablewiththosefromthelegacyACT.
ThefindingsaffirmthattheenhancedACTprovidesareliableandvalidmeasureof
students’academicreadiness,supportingconsistentinterpretationanduseofscores
acrosseducationalcontexts.Asaresult,wedonotanticipateaneedforstatesorother
institutionstochangetheiruseofACTsectiontestscoresindecision-making.Forexample,performancelevelsthatweresetthroughastandard-settingprocessesandotherACT
sectioncutscorescancontinuetobeused.
Reducedtestlengthhadminoreffectsonprecisionanddidnotaffecttheconstructsmeasured
OneofthemaindifferencesbetweenthelegacyACTandtheenhancedACTisthatthe
enhancedversionhasfewerquestionsandashortertestingtimebutmoretimeper
question.Thischangeaimstoreducetestfatigueandimprovethetestingexperience.
However,suchmodificationscouldpotentiallyresultinchangestotheconstructs
measuredinthetestsectionsandreducedscoreprecision.Thesefactorswereevaluatedaspartofthecognitivelabsandexternalpanelreviewsdescribedabove.Then,ouranalysesin
0.94
0.88
0.88
0.93
0.88
0.88
0.89
0.84
0.83
0.89
0.85
0.85
0.97
0.94
0.94
1.00
0.90
0.80
0.70
0.60
0.50
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.00
Reliability
LegacyFormEnhancedForm1EnhancedForm2
2.66
2.75
1.58
2.23
2.26
1.43
1.92
1.94
2.22
1.88
2.22
2.25
1.03
1.32
1.35
2.5
2
1.5
1
0.5
StandardErrorofMeasurement
3
0
aLegacyFormEnhancedForm1uEnhancedForm2
Figure1.ReliabilityandStandardErrorofMeasurementfortheLegacyand
EnhancedFormsoftheACTNotethattwoseparateformsoftheenhancedACTwereusedinthelinkingstudy,andeachisshowninthefigure.
ACTState&FederalPolicy|InterpretingScoresontheEnhancedACT4
C·
©2025byACTEducationCorp.Allrightsreserved.
thelinkingstudyensured
thattheconstruct
equivalencerequiredfor
effectivelinkingwasmet
empirically;thelinkingstudyisdescribedbelowandinfulldetailin“TheEnhancedACTLinkingStudyReport.
”3
Toensurethatthischangedidnotaffecttheconstructsbeingmeasuredineachtestsection,weconducted
confirmatoryfactoranalysesusingvariousmodels.The
resultsoftheseanalyses
Form
Mean
Standard
Deviation
English
LegacyForm
20.68
6.31
EnhancedForm1
20.78
6.40
EnhancedForm2
20.76
6.44
Math
Reading
Science
LegacyForm
20.85
5.44
EnhancedForm1
20.84
5.60
EnhancedForm2
LegacyForm
20.93
22.44
5.57
6.59
EnhancedForm1
22.37
6.67
EnhancedForm2
LegacyForm
22.41
21.76
6.71
5.74
EnhancedForm1
21.79
5.73
EnhancedForm2
21.78
5.83
Table1.ScaleScoreDescriptiveStatistics
showedconsistencyintheconstructequivalenceofmeasurement,withfitindicesand
factorloadingsoftheenhancedACTformssimilartothoseofthelegacyACTform.Inotherwords,theanalysesshowedthatthelegacyandenhancedtestsectionsmeasurethesameunderlyingacademicskills.Asanticipated,reducingthenumberofquestionsdidleadtoasmalldecreaseinreliabilityandasmallincreaseinthestandarderrorofmeasurement.
However,thesechangeswereminorandwellwithinacceptableindustrystandards.In
particular,thereliabilityofeverysectiontestremainedwellover0.80.Thisresultindicatesthat,overall,thetestenhancementsdonotfundamentallychangetheaccuracyofthe
scores.
SectionscoresfromtheenhancedACTareinterchangeablewithsectionscoresfromthelegacyACT
AfterestablishingthatthelegacyandenhancedACTtestsweresufficientlysimilar,we
linkedtheenhancedtesttothelegacytestusingawell-establishedmethodologyknownasIRTtrue-scoreequating.Threesignificantfindingsemergedfromthispartofthestudy:
StatesandotherinstitutionswillnotneedtorevisithowtheyinterpretACTsection
scoresfordecision-makingandaccountability.
•Wecomparedthedifficultyofquestionsonthe
enhancedandlegacyformstoensurethattheenhancedformsmetthetestspecifications.Theanalysisconfirmedthattheenhancedformsdidmeettestspecificationsandthatslightdifferencesindifficultydidnotimpactthe
comparabilityofthescoresbetweentheforms.
3TheEnhancedACTLinkingStudyReport
ACTState&FederalPolicy|InterpretingScoresontheEnhancedACT5
C·
©2025byACTEducationCorp.Allrightsreserved.
•Thelinkingresultsledtonearlyidenticalscoredistributionsofthelegacyandenhancedforms,meaningthatscoresrepresentthesamelevelofachievementbetweenthe
legacyandenhancedforms,asshowninTable1.
•Theresultsofpopulationinvarianceevaluationshowedconsistencybetweenlegacyandenhancedforms,indicatingthelinkingresultsarerobust.
Together,thesefindingsshowthattheenhancedACTmaintainsconsistentmeasurementpropertieswiththelegacyACT,andsectionscoresontheenhancedACTare
interchangeablewithsectionscoresonthelegacyACT,allowingfordirectcomparisonbetweenstudentscoresoneachofthetwoassessments.Therefore,statesandotherinstitutionswillnotneedtorevisithowtheyinterpretACTsectionscoresfordecision-makingandaccountability.
UnderstandingtheNewCompositeScoreCalculation
GivingstudentstheflexibilityofanoptionalsciencesectionrequiredustochangethewaywecalculatetheACTCompositescore.OnthelegacyACT,theCompositescoreisthe
roundedaverageofthestudent’sscoresontheEnglish,math,reading,andscience
sections(“EMRS”).OntheenhancedACT,theCompositescoreistheroundedaverageof
theEnglish,math,andreadingsectionscores(“EMR”).Thesciencesectionscoreandthe
STEMscore(averageofscienceandmathematicssectionscores)willcontinuetobe
reportedforstudentswhotakethesciencetest.WhilethesciencescorewillnolongerbeincludedintheCompositecalculation,itremainsavaluableindicatorofstudents’scientificreasoningskillsandpreparednessforSTEM-relatedfields,andorganizationsmaycontinuetoconsiderscienceandSTEMscoresforadmissionsandscholarshipdecisions.
LegacyCompositeScore(“EMRS”)NewCompositeScore(“EMR”)
English,math,andreadingtests
English,math,reading,andsciencetests
Table2.LegacyandNewCompositeScoreCalculations
BecausetheCompositescoreisameasureofgeneralacademicreadinessthatplaysavitalpartindecision-makingformanyinstitutions,itisimportanttounderstandthepropertiesofthenewEMRCompositescoreanditsrelationshiptothelegacyEMRSversion.Our
investigationintothesechangesissummarizedbelow.Fulldetailscanbefoundinthe
technicalreport:“InitialEvidenceSupportingInterpretationsofScoresfromtheEnhancedACTTest.
”4
OuranalysesdemonstratethattheCompositescoresfromtheenhancedACTcanbeusedinterchangeablywiththelegacyCompositescoresforthesamepurposes.In
4InitialEvidenceSupportingInterpretationsofScoresfromtheEnhancedACTTest
ACTState&FederalPolicy|InterpretingScoresontheEnhancedACT6
C·
©2025byACTEducationCorp.Allrightsreserved.
addition,therearesomepracticaldifferencesbetweenthedistributionsofthetwoscoresthatinstitutionsshouldanticipate,whicharediscussedbelow.
LegacyACT
EnhancedACT
Composite
Composite
(EMRS)
(EMR)
14
14
15
15
16
16
17
17
18
18
19
19
20
20
21
21
22
22
23
23
24
24
25
25
26
26
27
27
28
28
29
29
30
30
31
31
32
32
33
33
34
34
35
35
36
36
TheCompositeScoreCalculationsareInterchangeable
Ourresearchhasdeterminedthat,exceptforverylowCompositescores,theEMRSandEMRscoresconcordwitheachotherpointforpoint.Thatis,whenwe
establishedanequipercentilescoreconcordance
betweentheEMRandEMRSCompositescores,theclosestEMRscoretoanyEMRSscoreabove13isthesamescore.ThesameanalysisshowsthattheEMR
scoreisanear-perfectpredictoroftheEMRSscore,
withacorrelationof0.99.Forthisreason,no
conversionbetweenlegacyACTCompositescores
andenhancedACTCompositescoresisneeded,andwewillreportEMRS-andEMR-calculatedCompositescoresasinterchangeablewitheachother.Inall
officialscorereporting,astudentwillonlyreceiveoneCompositescore,andtherewillbenolabelindicatingwhetheritisEMRorEMRS.Stakeholderscan
determinetheCompositescoreversionbasedonthetestdate—onlineNationaltestadministrations
startinginApril2025andalltestadministrationsbeginninginSeptember2025willreportthenewEMRcompositescore
.
OuranalysesconfirmedtheappropriatenessofusingCompositescoresfordecision-makingbecausetheEMRandEMRSCompositescoreshavenearly
identicalpredictivepowerwhenitcomestostudentsuccessincollege.Infact,asshowninFigure2,thecorrelationsbetweenCompositescoreandcollegeoutcomes(first-yearGPA,likelihoodofearninga
Table3.ConcordancebetweenLegacyandEnhanced
CompositeScores5
bachelor’sdegree,andlikelihoodofearninganydegree)wereidenticalfortheEMRSscoreobtainedfromthelegacyACTandforEMRobtainedfromasimulatedenhancedACT.
(NotethatthesimulationaccountedfortheenhancedACT’sshortertestlength).
5NotethatconcordanceestimatesforEMRSscoresbelow14werenotobtainedbecausethecumulativefrequencyofscoreswaslessthan50inthatscorerange,resultinginunreliableestimates.
ACTState&FederalPolicy|InterpretingScoresontheEnhancedACT7
C·
©2025byACTEducationCorp.Allrightsreserved.
.35.35
LegacyACTEMRS
SimulatedEnhancedACTEMR
.43.43
.40.40
First-YearEarnedEarnedAny
CollegeBachelor'sDegree
GPADegreeN=116,918
N=1,111,776N=116,918
Figure2.CorrelationsofEMRSandEMR
CompositeScoreswithFirst-YearCollegeGPAandDegreeAttainment
Similarly,Figure3shows
thattheEMRSandEMR
CompositescorescorrelatewithhighschoolGPAandtheACTRigorIndex,whichisameasurethatcanbe
usedtocomparestudents,courseperformancefairlyacrossdifferentcourseworktaken,atlevelsnearly
identicaltoeachother.
Therefore,wewillreporttheEMRandEMRSCompositescoresinterchangeably,andtheevidenceshould
encouragestakeholderstocontinuetousethe
Compositescoreasthey
haveinthepast.Inaddition,thecurrentACT-SAT
concordancecancontinuetobeused
.6
LegacyACTEMRS
EnhancedACTEMR
.56
.54
.48
.50
HighSchoolGPARigorIndex
Figure3.CorrelationsofEMRSandEMR
CompositeScoreswith
HighSchoolGPAandtheACTRigorIndex.7
PracticalImplicationsoftheNewCompositeScoreCalculation
AlthoughourresearchprovidesastrongbasisforusingtheEMRCompositescore
interchangeablywiththeEMRSCompositescore,therearesomepracticalconsiderationsthatstakeholdersshouldunderstand
.
First,therewillbeatransitionperiodinwhichsometest-takersreceiveanEMRCompositescore,andothersreceiveanEMRSCompositescore.Inthespringof2025,mostjuniorswill
6ACTrecommendsstakeholderscontinuetousetheACT/SATConcordancetoalign:
•ACTCompositescoreswithSATTotalscores
•ACTmathscoreswithSATmathscores
•ACTEnglish+readingscoreswithSATreading/writingscores
Whileformalprogressonupdatingtheconcordancehasnotyetbegun,ACTresearchersarepreparedto
collaboratewithCollegeBoardcounterpartswhenthetimingisappropriate,shoulditbedeterminedthatanupdateisnecessary.AreviewandupdateoftheconcordancebetweenACTandSATscoreswouldrequire
sufficientdatafromstudentswhohavetakenboththeenhancedACTandthedigitalSAT.
7Notethatthedifferencesdonotreachthestandardp<.05leveloftenusedasathresholdforstatisticalsignificance.
ACTState&FederalPolicy|InterpretingScoresontheEnhancedACT8
C·
©2025byACTEducationCorp.Allrightsreserved.
receiveanEMRSCompositescore
,8
whereaswewill
beginreportingEMR
CompositescoresforallexamineesinSeptember
2025.Forthisreason,weanticipatethattheACT-testedgraduatingclassof
2025willnearlyuniversallyhaveEMRS-calculated
Compositescores,theACT-
GraduatingClass
Year
Projected
Percentageof
Graduateswith
EMRScore
Projected
Percentageof
Graduateswith
EMRSScore
2025
0.3%
99.7%
2026
33.5%
66.5%
2027
98.9%
1.1%
Table4.ProjectedShareofEMRandEMRSCompositeScoresbyGraduatingClassYear
testedgraduatingclassof2026willhaveamixofEMR-calculatedandEMRS-calculated
Compositescores,andtheACT-testedgraduatingclassof2027willnearlyuniversallyhaveEMR-calculatedscores.Projectionsbasedonhistoricalgraduatingclassdatausinga
student’slastACTscoreareprovidedinTable4.InstitutionsofhighereducationwilllikelyseeagreaterproportionofEMRscoresfortheclassof2026thanthoseprojectedhere
becausestudentswhoapplytocollegearemorelikelytotaketheACTmorethanonce,
makingtheirmostrecenttest(andalsoSuperscore
9)
likelytobethenewEMRCompositescore.
ThesecondpracticalconsiderationisthatweanticipateaslightincreaseinthenumberofstudentswhowillscoreatthebottomoftheCompositescoredistribution.Becauseofthis,weanticipatethataverageACTCompositescoreswilldeclinebyapproximately0.1to0.4
pointsformostpopulations,asshowninFigure4.Itisimportanttonotethatthe
anticipateddeclines,thoughrealinthesensethattheymayhaveactualconsequences,areofamagnitudethatiswellwithintherangeofnormalannualvariationoftheComposite
score.Further,ifallstudentstookthesciencetest,wewouldexpectmorethan90%tohaveanEMRCompositescorethatiswithinonepointofwhattheirEMRSCompositescore
wouldhavebeenifthelegacyCompositescorewerereported.
Outofadesiretofullysupportinstitutionsinorganizationalplanning,weareproviding
supplementalreportstohighereducationinstitutionsthatreceiveACTscoresthatwillhelpthemunderstandandplanforanyminorimpactsfromthechangeinCompositescore
calculation.Thereportsshowaprojectionofthenumberofstudentsatoraboveeachscore
8OnlyexamineeswhotaketheACTNational(Saturday)onlineteststartinginApril2025willreceivethenew
EMR-calculatedCompositescore.AllotherexamineesinSpring2025willtakethelegacyACTandwillreceiveanEMRS-calculatedComposite.
9TheACTSuperscorewillnolongerincludethesciencescoreafterthetransitiontothenewEMR-calculated
Compositescore.WhengeneratingtheACTSuperscorereport,wewilluseastudent'sbestscorefromeach
section,regardlessofwhichversionofthetestthatsectionscorecamefrom.Thereportwillstilldisplaythe
highestscienceandSTEMscoresifthestudenthastakenthesciencesection.Ifnot,thereportwillshow"-/-"forthatsection.
ACTState&FederalPolicy|InterpretingScoresontheEnhancedACT9
C·
©2025byACTEducationCorp.Allrightsreserved.
pointforthenewEMRCompositescore
alongsidehistoricaldatashowingthelegacy
EMRSCompositescore.Thisinformationcanbeusedtoassesspotentialimpactstoexisting
programsbasedon
Compositescorecutoffs.
AdditionalResources
Tosupportstakeholders
withinformationabout
thetransitiontothe
enhancedACT,several
EMR21.4
22.621.3
EMRS
22.4
21.621.3
19.2
19.418.0
18.3
June2024
EnhancedACT
Spring2024SchoolDay
2024High
SchoolCohort
2022College
Enrollees
20224-YearCollege
Enrollees
Figure4.AverageACTCompositeScore,SelectedPopulations
resourcesareavailablethroughtheACTTestEnhancementssectionofACT.org.
•PracticeTests:Wehavereleasedtimedanduntimedpracticetestsalignedtothenewtestbluep
温馨提示
- 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
- 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
- 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
- 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
- 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
- 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。
最新文档
- 未来五年新形势下工矿建筑砖石工程行业顺势崛起战略制定与实施分析研究报告
- 零售门店销售数据统计报表模板
- 物流配送中心岗位操作规范
- 2025年光伏支架全球市场竞争格局与发展趋势报告
- 电力工程施工监理细则手册
- 雨污水管网及外网工程施工设计方案
- 合同管理风险控制及应对策略
- 锅炉安装与调试流程表格模板
- 酒店服务质量提升年度工作计划
- 餐饮业厨房卫生安全检查要点
- 员工隐私安全意识培训课件
- 预防接种规范知识培训课件
- 部队装备换季保养课件
- DB 5303∕T 23-2024 《露地甜樱桃种植技术规程》
- 《微压富氧康养整体空间设备》
- 卫星互联网基础知识培训课件
- 2025年敖汉旗就业服务中心招聘第一批公益性岗位人员的112人模拟试卷含答案详解
- 婚姻家庭继承实务讲座
- 新内瘘穿刺护理
- 钳工个人实习总结
- 大健康养肝护肝针专题课件
评论
0/150
提交评论