溶栓评估及再通选择课件_第1页
溶栓评估及再通选择课件_第2页
溶栓评估及再通选择课件_第3页
溶栓评估及再通选择课件_第4页
溶栓评估及再通选择课件_第5页
已阅读5页,还剩37页未读 继续免费阅读

下载本文档

版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领

文档简介

急性脑梗死诊治热点:

溶栓出血预测及血管再通方法选择

血管再通方法

MethodsinrecanalizationIntravenousrtPAthrombolysis(IVT)Intra-arterialthrombolysis(IAT)CombinationofIVTandIAT/MechanicaldevicesMechanicalendovascularrecanalizationSono-thrombolysisAcuteangioplastyandstenting

BarM,etal.JNeuralTransm(2011)118:1131–1138AHAacuteischemicstrokeguideline.Stroke.2013;44:870-947Limitationsofiv.rtPALimitedto<4.5hoursOnlyaminorityofstrokepatientsbeeligibleforthistreatmentLowrecanalizationrates(6%-44%)IncreasedriskofsymptomaticICH(6.4%vs0.6%)AlexandrovAV.JInternMed2010;267:209–219溶栓后症状性颅内出血预测量表研究

HAT

SPAN-100

SITS

THRIVE

LouM,SafdarA,MehdirattaM,KumarS,SchlaugG,CaplanL,SearlsD,SelimM.The

HAT

Score:asimplegradingscaleforpredicting

hemorrhage

after

thrombolysis.

Neurology.2008;71(18):1417-23.HAT

(HemorrhageAfterThrombolysis)量表总共5分,随着分值增高,症状性颅内出血风险增高SPAN-100量表(strokeprognosticationusingageandNIHStrokeScale-100)年龄+入院时NIHSS评分

以100为分界点,大于100出血风险高对预测症状性颅内出血的敏感性较低,特异性较高SaposnikG,GuzikAK,ReevesM,OvbiageleB,JohnstonSC.StrokePrognosticationusingAgeandNIHStrokeScale:SPAN-100.

Neurology,

2013;80(1):21-8.SITS量表(SafeImplementationofThrombolysisinStroke)SITS量表包括9个因素(入院时NIHSS评分、血糖、收缩压、年龄、体重、脑卒中发生后开始治疗时间、阿司匹林或者阿司匹林和氯吡格雷的联合运用、高血压史),总共12分

对症状性颅内出血风险的预测,按照分值高低进行分层MazyaMV,AhmedN,FordGA,HobohmC,MikulikR,NunesAP,WahlgrenN.RemoteorExtraischemicIntracerebralHemorrhage-AnUncommonComplicationof

Stroke

Thrombolysis:ResultsFromthe

Safe

Implementation

ofTreatmentsin

StrokeInternational

Stroke

ThrombolysisRegister.Stroke

2014;45(6):1657-1663THRIVE(TotaledHealthRisksinVascularEvents)量表该量表总共9分,随分值增高,症状性颅内出血风险增高FlintAC,FaigelesBS,CullenSP,etal.THRIVE

score

predicts

ischemic

stroke

outcomes

and

thrombolytichemorrhage

risk

inVISTA.Stroke

2013;44(12):3365-9.THRIVE量表能在亚洲人群(尤其是中国人)预测出血转化风险吗?雷春艳吴波刘鸣等,Stroke.2014;45:1689-1694本期推荐阅读文章社论:21世纪预后估计与卒中治疗的艺术用2分作为分界点评估出血转化的风险(心源性脑梗死:敏感性:62.5%,特异性:73.5%;非心源性脑梗死:敏感性:71.2%,特异性:65.6%)雷春艳吴波刘鸣等,Stroke.2014;45:1689-1694心源性脑梗死非心源性脑梗死THRIVE0-2n=196THRIVE3-5n=256THRIVE6-9n=53PValueTHRIVE0-2n=2434THRIVE3-5n=848THRIVE6-9n=92PValue出血转化30(15.3)69(27.0)15(28.3)0.004100(4.1)73(8.6)11(11.9)<0.001雷春艳吴波刘鸣等,Stroke.2014;45:1689-1694提示THRIVE量表分值越高,心源性脑梗死和非心源性脑梗死患者发生出血转化的风险越高

lTHRIVE每增加1分,心源性脑梗死患者的出血危险增加1.15倍(95%CI1.03to1.30,P=0.003),非心源性脑梗死患者的出血风险增加1.29倍(95%CI1.17to1.40,P<0.001)动脉溶栓

Intra-arteralthrombolysisPotentialadvantagesLowertotaldose/higherlocaldoseofagents(减少出血)GreaterrecanalizationratesMayhavewidertimewindowPotentialdisadvantagesCathetermanipulationandNeedskilledpersonsDelayininitiationofthrombolysis围手术期镇静手术并发症ExpensiveWhatabouttheEvidence?FirstRCT:PROACTIITrialr-pro-UK+heparinvsIVheparinwithin6h.180patients,M1orM2MCAocclusion.NIHSS>/=4(Average17)MediantimetoIAthrombolysis5.7hoursFurlanA,etal.JAMA,1999Dec1;282(21):2003-11PROACTIITrial结果mRS<2:40%VS25%(P=0.043)Recanalisationat2h:66%vs18%Symptomatichemorrhage:10%vs2%(P=0.06)Nodifferenceinmortality(25%VS.27%)FurlanA,etal.JAMA,1999Dec1;282(21):2003-11WhatabouttheEvidence?SR:5RCTswith395participants(40-180)Timewindow:3forMCA:<6hours1forICAorMCA:<6hours1forBAorVA:<24hoursFibrinolyticagents:

Pro-urokinase;urokinase;t-PALeeM,etal.Stroke,2010;41:932-937Meta-analysisofRCTsIAfibrinolysiswasassociatedwithincreasedgoodandexcellentoutcomesLeeM,etal.Stroke,2010;41:932-937

桥接(Bridging)

CombinedIVandIAthrombolysis

SR:15studies(Non-RCT)included559strokepatientstreatedwithacombinedIV/IAapproachThepooledestimateforrecanalizationratewas69.6%(95%CI,63.9%–75.0%)Theshortermeantimetointravenoustreatment,thegreatertherecanalizationrate(per10-minutedecrease:OR,1.24;95%CI,1.02–1.51)andthelowermortalityrate(per10-minutedecrease:OR,0.75;95%CI,0.60–0.94)MazighiM,etal.Stroke,2012;43:1302-08Combined(Bridging)TherapyBridgingtherapywasassociatedwithafavorableoutcome(mRS:0-2)MazighiM,etal.Stroke,2012;43:1302-08BridgingTherapyAlthoughthesepositiveefficacyandsafetyfindingsfavorthebridgingtherapyapproach,thereisnodatafromRCTsRandomizedtrial--InterventionalManagementofStrokeIII(IMS-III)TargetN=900

IvrtPAalone(0.9mg/kg)vscombinedIV/IA(0.6mg/kgover30minfollowedbyimmediateangiography.Ifclotisdemonstrated,theneuro-interventionalistwillthenchoosefromcurrentlyavailablebuttrialdefinedintra-arterialtreatmentapproaches.IATwillbegivenatmaximum2mgbolusand10mg/hr,max22mg)usingstandardmicrocathether.The

Interventional

Management

of

Stroke

(IMS-III

trial)Thepatientswhohadreceivedintravenoust-PAwithin3hoursaftersymptomonsetwererandomlyassignedtoreceiveadditionalendovasculartherapyorintravenoust-PAalone,ina2:1ratioTheprimaryoutcomemeasure:amodifiedRankinscalescoreof2orlessat90daysBroderickJP,etal.NEnglJMed,2013;368:893-903血管内治疗VS静脉溶栓endovasculartherapy:

-Intra-arterialthrombolysis-mechanicalendovascularrecanalization(clotdisruption/extraction)-orcombination血管内治疗优于静脉溶栓吗?CicconeA,etal.NEnglJMed,2013;368:904-13(The

SYNTHESISExpansionInvestigators)结果:At3months,55patientsintheendovascular-therapygroup(30.4%)and63intheintravenoust-PAgroup(34.8%)werealivewithoutdisability(OR,0.71;95%CI,0.44to1.14;P=0.16)Theendovasculartherapyisnotsuperiortostandardtreatmentwithintravenoust-PAinpatientswithacuteischemicstroke后循环(Posteriorcirculation)?ThevastmajorityofthedataonreperfusionwereobtainedintheanteriorcirculationwithlimitedevidenceintheposteriorcirculationAsinglelargeprospectiveregistry,theBasilarArteryInternationalCooperationStudy(BASICS)register592patientsSchonewilleWJ,etal.LancetNeurol2009;8:724–30Patientsweredividedintothreetherapeuticalgroups:1、Antithrombotictherapy;2、i.v.thrombolysis;3、EndovasculartherapyInthiscohortofpatients,endovasculartherapydidnotshowsuperiorityoverIVthrombolysisintermsofmortalityordependencyPatientshadanincreasedriskofpoorfunctionaloutcomeastimetorecanalizationtherapybecamelonger:

≦3hours:62%3to6hours:67%(RR,1.06;0.91–1.25)

6to9hours:77%(RR,1.26;1.06–1.51)>9hours:85%(RR,1.47;1.26–1.72)Asignificantincreasedchanceofapooroutcomewhenrecanalizationtherapyisstarted6hoursafterestimatedtimeofBAO.PublishedonlineSeptember18,2012再通(中间指标)=临床效果(终点)吗?Recanalization=favorableoutcome?Higherrecanalizationratesatanextendedtimeframedonotnecessarilyleadtobetterclinicaloutcomesat3monthsAlexandrovAV.JInternMed2010;267:209–19Thelikelihoodofgoodoutcomeisdependentprimarilyon:1.Goodpremorbidstatusandrelativelysmalldeficitatpresentation;2.Smallinfarct;3.Short-timeintervalbetweenimagingandrecanalization;4.LowcomplicationraterelatedtotheinterventionUSFDAapproved4systemsCurrently,FDAapproveddevicesforendovascularclotremovalaretheMERCIRetrievalSystem,

thePenumbrasystem,SolitaireFR,andTrevo.AlexandrovAV.JInternMed2010;267:209–219AHAGuideline2013,Stroke;44:870-947RelatedGuidelinesEndovasculartherapyofacuteischemicstroke:reportoftheStandardsofPracticeCommitteeoftheSocietyofNeuro-InterventionalSurgery(Surgery)

BlackhamKAetal.JNeuroInterventSurg2012;87-93IndicationsforthePerformanceofIntracranialEndovascularNeurointerventionalProcedures(AHA)

温馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
  • 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
  • 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
  • 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
  • 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

评论

0/150

提交评论