APEC:数字化对数字贸易的经济影响-Understanding the economic impact of digitalisation on digital trade Evidence from APEC economies_第1页
APEC:数字化对数字贸易的经济影响-Understanding the economic impact of digitalisation on digital trade Evidence from APEC economies_第2页
APEC:数字化对数字贸易的经济影响-Understanding the economic impact of digitalisation on digital trade Evidence from APEC economies_第3页
APEC:数字化对数字贸易的经济影响-Understanding the economic impact of digitalisation on digital trade Evidence from APEC economies_第4页
APEC:数字化对数字贸易的经济影响-Understanding the economic impact of digitalisation on digital trade Evidence from APEC economies_第5页
已阅读5页,还剩77页未读 继续免费阅读

下载本文档

版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领

文档简介

Understandingtheeconomicimpactofdigitalisationon

digitaltrade

EvidencefromAPECeconomies

APECDigitalEconomySteeringGroup

December2024

UnderstandingtheEconomicImpactofDigitalisationonDigitalTrade

EvidencefromAPECEconomies

APECDigitalEconomySteeringGroup

December2024

APECProject:DESG012024S

Producedby:

AAAccessPartnershipPteLtd

AsiaSquare,Tower2#11-21

12MarinaView

Singapore018961Contributors:

MarcusNg,DirectorandPracticeLead

WanLingKoh,SeniorManagerDarylTeo,Consultant

JunLeKoay,AnalystWithsupportof:

DepartmentofForeignAffairsandTrade,

RGCaseyBuilding,JohnMcEwenCrescent,BartonACT0221Australia.

Website:

.au/

For:

Asia-PacificEconomicCooperationSecretariat

35HengMuiKengTerraceSingapore119616

Tel:(65)68919600

Fax:(65)68919690

Email:info@Website:

©2024APECSecretariatAPEC#224-CT-01.21

AustralianAid

Access

partnership

Contents

ExecutiveSummary· ·6

1.DigitaltradeanddigitalintensitytrendsinAPEC· ·12

1.1.DigitaltradedevelopmentsinAPEC· ·12

1.2.DigitalisationofeconomiesinAPEC· ·17

2.Understandingimpactofdigitalisationondigitaltrade· ·29

2.1.Thelinkbetweendigitalisationanddigitaltrade· ·29

2.2.ImpactofdigitalisationondigitaltradeflowsinAPECeconomies· ·33

3.Unlockingdigitaltradethroughdigitalisation· ·40

4.Appendix· ·49

4.1.Methodologyanddatasourcestoapproximatedigitaltrade· ·49

4.2.Methodologyanddatasourcestoapproximatedigitalisation· ·51

4.3.Structuralgravitymodel:Specificationandresults· ·55

Glossaryofterms

ASEAN

AssociationofSoutheastAsianNations.

Digitalintensity

Theshareofinputsfromdigitalsectorsacrossallintermediateandcapitalinputs.Itisusedinthisstudyasanapproximationfor

digitalisationintheproductionprocess,thereforeitisusedinterchangeablywithdigitalisation.

Digitaltrade

Alltradethatisdigitallyorderedand/ordigitallydelivered.ItsmeasurementisdefinedinSection1.1ofthestudy.

Digitallyorderedtrade

Goodsandservicesthatarepurchasedbutnotnecessarilydeliveredthroughdigitalmeans.

Digitallydeliveredtrade

Usedinterchangeablywithdigitallydeliverableservices–Servicesthatcanbedelivereddigitally(e.g.,financialoradministrative

services)butnotnecessarilyorderedviadigitalplatformsorchannels.

E-commerce

Salesorpurchaseofgoodsorservices,conductedovercomputernetworksbymethodsspecificallydesignedforthepurposeof

receivingorplacingoforders.

FTA

FreeTradeAgreement.

GDP

GrossDomesticProduct–themonetaryormarketvalueofallfinalgoodsandservicesproducedandsoldwithinthebordersofagiveneconomyinagivenperiodoftime.

GVA

Grossvalueadded.Thisisthevaluegeneratedbyproducinggoodsandservicesandismeasuredasthevalueofoutputminusthe

valueofintermediateconsumption.Itisameasureofeconomiccontribution.

IMF

InternationalMonetaryFund.

Inputs

Resourcesusedtocreategoodsandservices(e.g.,rawmaterials,financialcapital,humancapital,etc.).

OECD

OrganisationforEconomicCo-operationandDevelopment.

WTO

WorldTradeOrganization.

UNCTAD

UnitedNationsConferenceonTradeandDevelopment.

5

ExecutiveSummary

Digitalisationhassignificantlychangedhowinternationaltradeisconducted,bothviatheuseofdigitalplatformstofacilitatetheexchangeofnon-digitalgoodsandservices,aswellasthroughtheincreaseindigitallydeliverableexports,includingfinancialandprofessionalservices,andmobileappsandcontent.

TheimpactofdigitalisationoftradeisofparticularsignificancetoAPECeconomieswhichalreadybenefitsubstantiallyfromcross-bordertrade.Asabloc,intra-APECtradeinmerchandiseandcommercialservicestradegrewalmostfivefoldbetween1994and2019.1In2022,intra-APECtradevolumesreachedUSD30trillionoralmosthalf(47%)ofglobaltrade.AnearlierstudycommissionedbyAPECfoundthatin2018,APECintra-regionaldigitaltradecontributedUSD2.1trilliontoeconomiesintheAPECregion,approximately4.1%ofregionalGDP.

Governmentsrecognisetheenormousopportunitypresentedbydigitaltradeandhavetakenstepstocreateaglobalrules-basedsystemtoharnesstheopportunity.Pastresearchdiscussedtheoverallbenefitsofdigitaltradeparticipationtoaneconomy,andtheimportanceofdigitaltraderulesindrivingdigitaltradegrowth.2However,increasingparticipationinthedigitaltradeecosystemalsodependsonthereadinessofthedomesticbusinessenvironment,includingbusinessesandconsumers.Thereisalreadygrowingrecognitionofthis,asdigitaleconomyagreements(e.g.,DigitalEconomyPartnershipAgreement(DEPA)areincreasinglygoingbeyonddigitaltraderuleswhichsupport“at-the-border”tradeliberalisation,tolookathoweconomiescanworktogethertostrengthen“behind-the-border”capabilities(e.g.,strengtheningdigitalinfrastructureorskills)tosupportdigitaltrade).

Pastresearchhasgenerallyacknowledgedthatincreaseddigitalisationisbeneficialfordigitaltradeparticipation,giventhelinkbetweenoveralldigitaladoptionandtheincreaseduseofdigitaltradetoolsaswellastheabilitytoproducedigitalgoodsandservices.3However,theempiricalevidenceonthestrengthofthisrelationshipremainslimited,largelyduetothelackofsufficientlygranulardataondigitaltradeflows.Furthermore,pastmeasuresofdigitalisationhavereliedonindicatorssuchasInternetuseorbroadbandcoverage.Suchdatahasnotbeenconsistentlyavailableacrosseconomiesandsectors,andwhereavailable,mightnotbedirectlycomparableduetodifferencesincollectionmethods.

ThisstudyaimstoaddressthisgapintheexistingbodyofliteraturebyusinganovelmethodologytoestimatedigitalisationlevelsamongAPECeconomies.Thiswillallowforacloserstudyontheextentofdigitalisationacrosseconomiesandsectorsaswellassupportamorein-depthexaminationoftherelationshipbetweendigitalisationanddigitaltrade.Itreliesonthefollowingmeasuresfordigitalisationanddigitaltrade:

1APECPolicySupportUnit(2020),ResearchOutcomes:SummaryofResearchProjectsandCOVID-19PolicyBriefs2020.Availableat:

/docs/default-source/Publications/2021/7/Research-Outcomes-Summary-of-Research-Projects-and-COVID-19-Policy-Briefs-2

020/221_PSU_Research-Outcomes-2020.pdf

2APECCommitteeonTradeandInvestment(CTI)(2023),EconomicImpactofAdoptingDigitalTradeRules:EvidencefromAPECMemberEconomies.Availableat:

/publications/2023/04/economic-impact-of-adopting-digital-trade-rules-evidence-from-apec-member-economies

3SeeFreundandWeinhold(2004);Choi(2010);Lin(2015);López-GonzálezandFerencz(2018);HermanandOliver(2022);Benz,JaaxandYotov(2022);López-González,SorescuandKaynak(2023).

6

(a)Digitalisation

Thestudyreliesondigitalintensityasanapproximationfordigitalisation.Thiscanbeexpressedastheshareofinputsfromdigitalsectorsacrossallintermediateandcapitalinputs.ExistingstudiestypicallymeasuredigitalisationthroughdigitalconnectivityindicatorssuchastheextentofInternetaccessorusage.Thisisunabletoprovideadirectindicationoftheextenttowhichthebusinessleveragesdigitaltoolstoimproveortransformtheprocessofproducinggoodsandservices.Digitalintensitycapturesamorefocusedperspectiveofhowdigitalisationenterstheproductionprocessthroughoneoftwoseparateinputcomponentsusedinproduction:(i)rawmaterials(intermediateinputs);and(ii)machineryandequipment(capitalinputs).Thisprovidesamoreconsistentmeasureofdigitalisationacrosssectorsaswellaseconomiesandenablesanalysistobeconductedatthesector-levelcomparedtoconnectivityindicatorswhicharetypicallyavailableonlyattheeconomy-level.

Itisimportanttoacknowledgethatthisapproachhasminorconceptuallimitations,whichhavebeennotedfortransparencyandtoguidefutureresearch.Sectorscurrentlyclassifiedasproducing‘digital’productsalsoproducenon-digitalintermediateinputs,albeitinsmallerproportions.Additionally,thismethodologydoesnotaccountfordifferencesinthequalityofdigitalproductsemployedasintermediateinputs,nordoesitcapturethelabourcontributionforthein-housedevelopmentofdigitalassets.

(b)DigitalTrade

ThisstudyreliesonthedefinitionestablishedintheOECD-WTO-IMFHandbookonMeasuringDigitalTrade(SecondEdition)andleveragesthesameapproachfromapreviousAPECstudy(alsodevelopedbyAccessPartnership)toprovideanestimateofdigitaltrade.4Broadly,themethodologyrecognisesthattherearetwokeycomponentsthatformdigitaltrade.

Component1coversgoodsandserviceswhicharedigitallyorderedbutnotnecessarilydeliveredthroughdigitalmeans.Examplesofsuchtransactionsarepurchasingawalletthroughane-commerceplatform,orbookingahotelstayabroadviaanonlineportal.Italsocoversdigitalcontentsuchasmusic,gamesormobileapplicationsorderedviadigitalplatformintermediaries.Component2coversservicesthataredigitallydeliverablebutnotnecessarilydigitallyordered.Thisincludesservicessuchasfinancialservicesandtelecommunicationsservices.

Byexaminingtheimpactofdigitalisationondigitalexportsforaneconomy,theresearchaimstosupportpolicymakersinadoptingevidence-basedapproachestostrengthendigitaltradeparticipation.Itseekstoprovideinsightsintothefollowingareas:

(a)Howdoesdigitalintensitydifferacrosseconomies?(b)Howdoesdigitalintensitydifferacrosssectors?

(c)Whatistheimpactofdigitalisationondigitaltrade?

4APECCommitteeonTradeandInvestment(CTI)(2023),EconomicImpactofAdoptingDigitalTradeRules:EvidencefromAPECMemberEconomies.Availableat:

/publications/2023/04/economic-impact-of-adopting-digital-trade-rules-evidence-from-apec-member-economies

7

A.Differencesindigitalintensityacrosseconomies

High-incomeeconomieswithadvantagesindigitalinfrastructure,humancapitalaswellasmoreresourcestoformulaterobustdigitalpolicyhavehigherdigitalintensity.Pastresearchsuggeststhesefactorsasdeterminantsoftheextentofdigitalisationinaneconomyandthathigh-incomeeconomiesgenerallyexhibithigherlevelsofdigitalinfrastructureandhumancapitaldevelopmentaswellashavemoreresourcestoputinplacerobustdigitalpoliciesandgovernanceframeworks.In2020,theaveragedigitalintensityforhigh-incomeeconomiesstoodat8.5%,whiletheaveragefornon-high-incomeeconomiesstoodat5.7%.TheaveragedigitalintensityacrossAPECeconomiesis7.2%.

However,non-high-incomeeconomiesareprogressingquickly.Non-high-incomeeconomiesoutpacedhigh-incomeeconomiesinprogressfordigitalisationbetween2000and2020.Between2000and2020,non-high-incomeAPECeconomiesoutpacedhigh-incomeeconomiesindigitalisationprogress,withaveragedigitalintensityincreasingby46%comparedto41%inhigh-incomeeconomies.Overall,APECeconomiessawa43%riseindigitalintensity,from5.1%in2000to7.2%in2020.Thisrapidprogresscanbeattributedtofactorssuchastheleapfroggingeffect,whereemergingeconomiesadoptnewertechnologieswithouttheburdenoflegacysystems,decreasingcostsofdigitaltechnologies,andproactivegovernmentalpoliciespromotingdigitalinfrastructureandskillstraining.

B.Differencesindigitalintensityacrosssectors

Servicessectorshavehigherdigitalintensitythannon-servicessectorsanddigitalisedatafasterpacebetween2000and2020.In2020,servicessectorsacrossAPECeconomiesexhibitedhigherlevelsofdigitalintensitycomparedtonon-servicessectorslikemanufacturing.Thehigherlevelofdigitalintensityinservicesisprimarilydrivenbythehighlevelsofdigitalisationintheinformationandtelecommunications(ICT)(29.3%)andthefinancialservices(21.0%)sectors.Thepaceofdigitalisationwasalsofasterincommercialservicessectors,withthedigitalintensityofthesesectorsincreasingby59.6%between2000and2020,comparedtoa44.0%increasefornon-commercialservicessectorsanda12.5%increasefornon-servicessectors.

ThereissignificantscopeforAPECeconomiestostrengthendigitalintensityinkeyeconomicsectors.SixAPECeconomies–BruneiDarussalam;Chile;Indonesia;Peru;thePhilippines;andRussia–hadalowerdigitalintensitythantheAPECaveragefortheirthreelargestsectorsmeasuredbygrossvalueadded(GVA)totheeconomy.WhilemanufacturingisoneofthemostimportantsectorsforAPECeconomiesandofthetopthreecontributorstoGVAforthemajorityofAPECeconomies,themanufacturingsectorlagscommercialservicessectorsindigitalintensity.In2020,commercialservicessectorsrecordedanaverageof9.9%indigitalintensitycomparedto6.8%forthemanufacturingsector.Inparticular,forthe12APECeconomiesforwhichmanufacturingisthetopGVAcontributor,fiverecordeddigitalintensitylevelswhichwerebelowtheAPECaverage.

C.Impactofdigitalisationondigitaltrade

Overall,higherdigitalintensitycorrelateswithhighertradevolumesofdigitallydeliverableservicesasdigitalisationimpactsthedemandandsupplyfunctionsfordigitaltrade.Theanalysisfoundthatdigitallydeliverableservicesexportsincreasedby2.5%(p<.011)forAPECeconomiesforeverypercentagepointincreaseindigitalintensity.Fromthedemand-sidechannel,digitalisationcreatesmorepossibilitiesforthecreationofdigitallydeliverableservicesandcontent,increasesusageofdigitalorderingplatformsthatextendsmarketreachtonewconsumers,andenhancesproductandservicequalityforproductdifferentiation.Fromthesupply-sidechannel,digitalisationstreamlinesbusinessprocessestoreduceproductioncosts,reducesentrybarrierstoincreasenumberofnewparticipatingfirms,andreducescostofreplicationtoscaleproductsandservices.

Theimpactofincreasingdigitalintensityondigitallydeliverableservicestradedoesnotvaryacrosseconomiesofdifferentlevelsofdevelopment.Theanalysisfoundnostatisticallysignificantdifferencebetweenhigh-incomeandnon-high-incomeeconomiesintermsofhowdigitalintensityimpacteddigitaltradeflows,suggestingthatbothhigh-incomeandnon-high-incomeeconomiescanbenefitsimilarlyfromincreasingdigitalisation.Priorresearch(e.g.,Dietal.,2022)foundthatdigital

8

infrastructure,humancapital,andcapacitytoinnovatewereimportantdriversoftradethatwerealsocorrelatedwithaneconomy’slevelofdevelopment.Thatincomelevelswerenotfoundtohaveanobservableeffectontherelationshipbetweendigitalintensityanddigitaltradeintheanalysissuggeststhatthelevelofincomedoesnotinherentlyconstrainaneconomy’scapacitytobenefitfromdigitalisation.Instead,investmentstodrivedigitalisationwillbenefiteconomiesofdifferentlevelsofdevelopment.

Theimpactofdigitalisationondigitaltradevariesdependingonthesector,withtheICTsectorexperiencingthemostpronouncedeffects,followedbythefinancialservicesandprofessionalservicessectors.Theanalysisfoundthatapercentagepointincreaseindigitalintensitycorrelateswith2.3%higherexportsofICTservicesand1.7%higherexportsoffinancialservicesandprofessionalservicesrespectively.Thedifferenceinimpactmaystemfromfundamentaldifferencesinthedriversofdemandfortheircoreservices.WhilethecostsavingsandinnovationthatdigitalisationdeliverscaninduceadditionaldemandforICTservicesduetogreaterprice-elasticity,itislikelytohaveamoremodesteffectondemandforfinancialservicesandprofessionalservices,wherethecorevaluepropositionmaybedrivenbyotherelementssuchashumanexpertise,personalisedadvice,andtrust-basedrelationships.

CriticalareasofcollaborationamongstAPECeconomies

Throughtheinsightsabove,fourkeyinsightsfromthestudythattranslateintopotentialactionitemsforAPECpolicymakershavebeenidentified.Theseactionitemsincludeareasfor(A)regionalcollaborationacrossAPECeconomies;and(B)developmentofeconomy-levelandsector-levelpolicywithinAPECeconomies.

Keyfindings

A.Actionitemsforregional

collaborationacrossAPECeconomies

B.Actionitemsfor

economy-levelandsector-levelpolicy

withinAPECeconomies

1.Increaseddigitalisationdrivesincreased

participationindigitallydeliverabletrade

APECpolicymakerscouldfocusdigitaltradeagreementsand

regionalcollaborationeffortsondomesticdigitalisation(“i.e.,behindtheborder”)initiatives

Domesticstrategies

orframeworkstodrive

digitalisationcouldsupportdigitaltradegrowth

2.Increaseddigitalisationhasnosignificant

impactonthevolumeofdigitallyorderedexports

Strengtheningregional

collaborationone-commercecouldsupportthegrowthofdigitallyorderedexports

Supportforsmalland

mediumenterprises(SMEs)toparticipateindigitaltradecoulddriveinclusivegainsfromthedigitaleconomy

3.Economieswith

developeddigital

infrastructure,robust

digitalpolicyandstronghumancapitalhave

higherdigitalisationlevels

Capacitybuildingeffortsto

drivedigitalisationcouldfocusondigitalinfrastructureandhumancapital

Non-high-incomeeconomiescanreapsignificantbenefits

throughpoliciesto

strengtheninvestmentindigitalinfrastructureandhumancapital

4.APECeconomiesare

notcapturingthefull

potentialofdigitalisationinprioritysectors

Regionalcollaborationto

supportdigitalisationinkey

sectorssuchasmanufacturingcouldbenefitdigitaltrade

growthinAPEC

Thedevelopmentoftargetedsectoralroadmapscould

bridgedigitalisationgapsinprioritysectors

9

1.DigitaltradeanddigitalintensitytrendsinAPEC

ThissectionprovidesanoverviewoftherecentdevelopmentsindigitaltradeandcurrentstateofdigitalisationacrossAPECeconomies.

1.1.DigitaltradedevelopmentsinAPEC

TheadoptionofdigitaltechnologiesbybusinessesandgovernmentsinAPEChavetransformedthewaythatgoodsandservicesarebeingcreatedandtraded.Digitaltechnologieshaveenabledtheproliferationofe-commerceplatformsthatlinksmall-scaleretailersdirectlytoconsumersinothermarketsaswellassupportedthecross-borderprocurementandprovisionofvariousservicessuchasthoseinthefinancial,professional,educationandhealthcaresectors,whichcanbedelivereddigitally.

TheimpactofdigitalisationontradeisofparticularsignificancetoAPECeconomieswhichalreadybenefitsubstantiallyfromcross-bordertrade.Asabloc,intra-APECtradeinmerchandiseandcommercialservicestradegrewalmostfivefoldbetween1994and2019.5In2022,intra-APECtradevolumesreachedUSD30trillionoralmosthalf(47%)ofglobaltrade.APECpolicymakersrecognisethepotentialbenefitsoftradedigitalisationandtheroleofdigitaltradeinsupportingthedevelopmentofAPECeconomies.AnearlierstudycommissionedbyAPECfoundthatin2018,APECintra-regionaldigitaltradecontributedUSD2.1trilliontoeconomiesintheAPECregion,approximately4.1%ofregionalGDP.6

ThefacilitationofdigitaltradeisalreadyanintegralpartofAPEC’sfutureworkplanswithAPECLeaderspledging,in2017,to“worktogethertorealisethepotentialoftheInternetanddigitaleconomy”andwelcomingtheadoptionoftheAPECInternetandDigitalEconomyRoadmap(AIDER).7TheAIDERidentifies11keyfocusareas(KFA)andwithKFA11focusingonthefacilitationofe-commerceandadvancingcooperationondigitaltrade.ThefindingsfromthisstudywillfurthersupportAPECeconomiesindevelopingevidence-basedapproachestofacilitatethegrowthofdigitaltradeinasustainableandinclusivemanner.

1.1.1DigitaltradedevelopmentsinAPEC

TheOECD-WTO-IMFHandbookonMeasuringDigitalTrade(SecondEdition)releasedin2023definesdigitaltradeasalltradethatisdigitallyorderedand/ordigitallydelivered.8TheHandbookseekstoaddressatleastinpartthechallengesinestimatingdigitaltradevolumestodateduetothelackofgloballyaligneddefinitionsandapproaches.ThisstudyreliesonthedefinitionestablishedintheHandbookandleveragesthesameapproachfromapreviousAPECstudy(alsodevelopedbyAccessPartnership)toprovideanestimateofdigitaltrade,againstthebackdropofexistingdataconstraints.9Broadly,themethodologyrecognisesthattherearetwokeycomponentsthatformdigitaltrade:

5APECPolicySupportUnit(2020),ResearchOutcomes:SummaryofResearchProjectsandCOVID-19PolicyBriefs2020.Availableat:

/docs/default-source/Publications/2021/7/Research-Outcomes-Summary-of-Research-Projects-and-COVID-19-Policy-Briefs-2

020/221_PSU_Research-Outcomes-2020.pdf

6Asia-PacificEconomicCooperation(2023),EconomicImpactofAdoptingDigitalTradeRules:EvidencefromAPECMemberEconomies.Availableat:

/docs/default-source/publications/2023/3/economic-impact-of-adopting-digital-trade-rules-evidence-from-apec-member-econo

mies/223_cti_economic-impact-of-adopting-digital-trade-rules.pdf?sfvrsn=e1021415_2

7Asia-PacificEconomicCooperation(n.d.),“DigitalEconomySteeringGroup”.Availableat:

/groups/committee-on-trade-and-investment/digital-economy-steering-group

8OECD,WTOandIMF(2023),HandbookonMeasuringDigitalTrade,SecondEdition.Availableat:

/trade/handbook-on-measuring-digital-trade-second-edition

_ac99e6d3-en

9APECCommitteeonTradeandInvestment(CTI)(2023),EconomicImpactofAdoptingDigitalTradeRules:EvidencefromAPECMemberEconomies.Availableat:

/publications/2023/04/economic-impact-of-adopting-digital-trade-rules-evidence-from-apec-member-economies

.

10

Component1coversgoodsandserviceswhicharedigitallyorderedbutnotnecessarilydeliveredthroughdigitalmeans.Examplesofsuchtransactionsarepurchasingawalletthroughane-commerceplatform,orbookingahotelstayabroadviaanonlineportal.Italsocoversdigitalcontentsuchasmusic,gamesormobileapplicationsorderedviadigitalplatformintermediaries.Component2coversservicesthataredigitallydeliverablebutnotnecessarilydigitallyordered.Thisincludesservicessuchasfinancialservicesandtelecommunicationsservices.

Specifictothisstudy,Component1(tradeindigitallyorderedgoodsandservices)wasestimatedforonly2016to2020duetoalackofrobuste-commercedatabefore2016.ThepreviousstudyhadsimilarlyestimatedComponent1for2016to2018.Component2wasestimatedfrom2000to2020.10

Duetothelimitationsofpublishedtradedata,theseestimatesdonotprovidetheabsolutevalueofalldigitaltradeflowsinagivenyearastheydonotencompassallaspectsthatconceptuallycomprisedigitaltrade11;butareinsteadusefulproxiesbasedoncurrentlyavailabledatatoshowoveralltrendsindigitaltradeflows,specificallytradeindigitallyorderedgoodsandservicesandtradeindigitallydeliverableservices.

Exhibit1showshowthesecomponentscoverdifferentaspectsofdigitaltrade.ThedetailedmethodologytoestimateeachcomponentisintheAppendix.

EXHIBIT1

Ourmethodologytomeasuredigitaltradecoversthedigitallyorderedanddigitallydeliveredcomponentsofdigitaltrade

Keytakeawaysfrom

OECD-WTO-IMF

HandbookonMeasuringDigitalTrade,2ndEdition

1.Digitaltradeisall

(international)tradethatisdigitallyorderedand/or

digitallydelivered

2.Digitaltrade

transactionsarein

principleincludedin

existingtradestatistics,although:theyarenotvisible,andthereare

severalchallengestorecordthem

Nature(How)

Typeofproduct(What)

Services

Goods

Digitallyordered

C1

Component1:Tradeindigitallyorderedgoodsand

services(i.e.,cross-bordere-commerce-purchasingawalletorbookingahotelstayabroadviaanonlineportal)

Digitallyordered

anddelivered

C1

C2

Component1:Tradein

digitalcontent(i.e.,

Component2:Tradeindigitallydeliverableservices(e.g.,

financialservicesandtelecommunications

services)1

music,gamespurchasedondigitalplatforms)

Note:BasedondefinitionsintheOECD-WTO-IMF

handbook,onlyservicescan

bedigitallydelivered.However,thisstudymakesanexceptiontoincludedigitalcontent2

(digitallydeliveredgoods)underComponent1

Digitallydelivered

Notes:

1.Thisincludesinsuranceandpensionservices;financialservices;telecommunications,computer,andinformationservices;andotherbusinessservices.

2.OECD-WTO-IMF(2023).Availableat:

/trade/handbook-on-measuring-digital-trade-second-edition

_ac99e6d3-enSource:LiteraturereviewandAccessPartnershipanalysis

10PapuaNewGuineawasexcludedfromthedatasetduetolackofdata.

11Forinstance,componentssuchasnon-monetarydigitalflowsareconceptuallyrelevantfordigitaltradebutnotmeasuredindomesticaccountsnorinternationalgoodsandservicestradestatisticsandhenceexcluded.Oneexampleisdataflowstosearchenginesandsocialnetworks,whichdonotentailadirectmonetarytransactionbutdosupportthem.SeeOECD,WTOandIMF(2023),HandbookonMeasuringDigitalTrade,SecondEdition.Availableat:

/trade/handbook-on-measuring-digital-trade-second-edition

_ac99e6d3-en

11

1.1.2TrendsindigitaltradeinAPEC

Trend1:Intra-regionaltradeinAPECdoubledbetween2016and2020withtradeindigitallyorderedgoodsandservicesleadinggrowth

APECintra-regionaldigitaltradein2020wasestimatedatUSD2.12trillion(Exhibit2)andconstituted28%ofAPECtotalintra-regionaltrade.ThisisnearlydoublefromUSD1.17trillionin2016atacompoundannualgrowthrate(CAGR)of16.0%.In2020,tradeindigitallyorderedgoodsandservices(e.g.,cross-bordere-commerce)comprisedalmostthree-quarters(74%)ofAPECintra-regionaldigitaltrade,withtradeindigitallydeliverablese

温馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
  • 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
  • 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
  • 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
  • 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

评论

0/150

提交评论