版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领
文档简介
McKinseyChinaAutoConsumerInsights2024
Evolution,notInvolution
April2024
Aboutthesurvey
Inthefourthquarterof2023,wesurveyed2,449autobuyersin19majorcitiesacrossChinarepresentingarangeofdemographicattributes,
includingfirst-tier,second-tier,third-tier,andfourth-tiercities,as
wellasNorth,Northeast,East,CentralandSouth,Southwest,and
NorthwestChina.Thereportdividedrespondentsbyage,gender,
income,purchasingexperience,andcurrentvehicletype.Basedonthedecision-makingprocessduringcarpurchasing,thissurveyprovides
deepanalysisofconsumerattitudes,vehiclepreferences,purchasinghabits,drivingexperiences,andafter-salesneeds.
Authors
MingyuGuan,Beijing
ThomasFang,ShanghaiBillPeng,HongKong
TonyZhou,Shanghai
Coverimage:@GettyImages
IIMcKinseyChinaAutoConsumerInsights2024
Executivesummary
TherapiddevelopmentinelectrificationandsmartificationoftheChinaautoindustryisundeniablyshapingandtransformingthepreferencesofautoconsumersinChina.
Reciprocally,theevolvingpreferencesandbehaviorsofChineseconsumersareexertinga
profoundinfluenceontheChinaautoindustry,compellingittoembraceelectrificationand
smartificationwithacceleratinginvestmentsinthesetwoareas.SuchmutualinfluenceisnotonlypivotalforthefutureoftheChineseautoindustrybutalsopoisedtoprofoundlyimpactthetechnologydevelopment,businessmodels,andcompetitivelandscapeoftheglobalautoindustryinthenextfivetotenyears.
TogaindeeperinsightsintotheevolvingpreferencesofChineseautoconsumers,McKinseyrecentlyconductedthelatestroundofitsannualChinaAutoConsumerSurvey.Basedontheresponses,wehaveidentifiedthefollowingsixkeyfindings.
1.Consumersarecontinuingthetrendoftradingup
TheChinaautomarketcontinuestointroducevariouscompetitivenewmodelsofsmartEVs,graduallyincreasingtheattractivenesstoconsumersandshiftingtheirattention
towardmid-andhigh-pricedmodels.Meanwhile,escalatingpricecompetition’simpact
onconsumerdecisionmakingremainslimited,with80percentofrespondentsindicatingthatpricecompetitionhasn’tacceleratedtheirvehiclepurchasedecisions.
2.PerceptionsofEVandICEbrandsarediverging
MultinationalOEMsnolongercommandpremiumprices,andtheirbrandhalosarealmostgone,atrendespeciallyevidentintheEVindustry.Meanwhile,ownersoftraditional
premiumMNCbrandsareswitchingtopremiumChineseEVbrands—atrendflowingalmostentirelyinonedirection.
3.EVpenetrationisrisingfast,withahiddenconcernofcharginganxiety
EVconsumersmakingpurchasingdecisionsareincreasinglyconsideringthe
performanceofthevehiclesthemselves,ratherthanregulatoryincentivessuchasfreelicenseplates.Also,theacceptanceofEVsbyChineseconsumershasseenitsfirst-everdeclineasEVcharginginfrastructureisdeployedslowlyinsomeareas.Thesituation
highlightstheextremeimportanceofoptimizingcharginginfrastructuretosupportthesustaineddevelopmentoftheEVsector.
McKinseyChinaAutoConsumerInsights20241
4.Direct-to-consumers(DTC)modeliswinningconsumertrusts,thankstoitshightransparencyacrosscustomerjourney
PremiumChineseEVbrandshaveadoptedomnichanneldirect-to-consumer(DTC)
models,whichhaveachievedremarkablecustomersatisfaction.Eveninafter-sales
maintenance,wherethepreviousyear’ssurveyfoundaperformancegapwithtraditionalOEMs,premiumChineseEVbrandsarecatchingup.
5.Autonomousdriving(AD)enjoysgreatpopularity,butchanceofmonetizationiscomingunderpressure
ConsumerdemandforADsolutionscontinuestoincrease.However,thefree-software
strategyoftoptechnology-orientedOEMshasmadeconsumerslesswillingtopayforADtechnologies.Amongthosewillingtopay,theamounttheyarewillingtopayhasdeclined.
6.Consumersareawareoflow-carbonvehiclesbutlesswillingtopayapremiumforthem
Nearly70percentofChineseconsumersareawareoflow-carbonvehiclesandwillingtopayextraforthem,butboththewillingnesstopayandtheamounttheywouldpayhavedeclined.
Weseetheindustryevolving,notinvoluting,underpressure.GuidedbyChineseconsumers,theEVsector’sgrowthatfullspeedisnowaninevitabletrend,andnewconsumer
preferencesandbehaviorsareemerginganddeveloping.However,thefundamental
commercialbehaviorsareconstant:meetdiverseconsumerneedsandcreatereasonableeconomicvalue.
2McKinseyChinaAutoConsumerInsights2024
1
Consumersare
continuingthetrendoftradingup
Keyinsights:
—TradingupcontinuestobepopularamongChineseconsumers,andthemarketshareofpremiumvehiclescontinuestogrow
—Meanwhile,theshareofconsumerswhosaytheywouldliketotradedownhasdroppedsignificantlycomparedwiththeresultsofthesurveyconductedayearearlier
—TheintensepricecompetitionthathasbeenoccurringinChinahashadalimitedimpactonstimulatingconsumption
McKinseyChinaAutoConsumerInsights20243
Thedesiretotradeupisboostingsalesofpremiumvehicles
Overthepastfewyears,moreandmoreChineseconsumershavebeenupgradingtheirvehicles.Asaresult,themarketshareofpremiummodelsincreasedfrom10percentofpassengervehiclesin2016to23percentin2023(Exhibit1).
Exhibit1
InChina,thepremiumsegmentofpassengervehiclescontinuestopostdouble-digitgrowthin2023
PassengervehiclessalesinChinabysegments
millionunitsGrowthCAGR
XX%EVpenetrationrateinsegment2016~20222023vs.2022
2.6%
-3.9%
None
Premium
11.2%
19.4%
Premium1
100%=2323222120212022-1.9%6.1%
90%
89%
87%
85%
81%
80%
14%
79%
26%
77%
33%
23%
37%
20%
16%
21%
25%
19%
15%
11%
13%
10%
2017201820192020
2016
202120222023
1.Premiumcardefinition:premiumbrandsbasedonconsumerperception,includingtraditionalpremiumbrandsandemergingpremiumEVbrands.
Source:ChinaNewCarInsuranceRegistrationDatabaseMcKinsey&Company
Accordingtotheresultsofourlatestsurvey,Chineseconsumersmaintainastrongdesiretoupgradeintheirnextcarpurchase,particularlythosewhoseexistingcarispricedbelowRMB200,000(Exhibit2).
—MostlikelytotradeuparethosewhoseexistingcarispricedbelowRMB100,000:morethan70percentsaytheyintendtotradeupwhentheypurchasetheirnextcar;
—Over50percentofcarownerswhoseexistingcarispricedatRMB100,000toRMB150,000saytheywilltradeup;
—Nearly50percentofrespondentswhoseexistingcarispricedatRMB150,000toRMB200,000saytheywilldoso;
—ForthepricesegmentaboveRMB200,000,themostcommonchoiceamongconsumersistostaywheretheyare.Inthatsegment,premiumsmart-EVmodelswithgreatvalueformoneyarecontinuallybeingintroducedtothemarket.Theseattractrelevantconsumer
groups,inspiringtheirrationalthinkinginsteadofconstantlypursuingmodelswithahigherprice.
4McKinseyChinaAutoConsumerInsights2024
Exhibit2
Chineseconsumers’desiretoupgradetheirvehicleremainsstrong
Budgetforthenextcarvs.priceofcarcurrentlyowned
%ofrespondents
Budgetforthenextcar,
RMBthousands
StayinthesamerangePrefertotradeup.PrefertopaylessHighest%group
<100
100-150
150-200
200-300
Priceofcarcurrently
owned,
RMBthousands
300-400
>400
<100
100-150
150-200
200-300
300-400
>400
<100
100-150
150-200
200-300
300-400
>400
43%
57%
0%
0%
0%
0%
12%
34%
52%
2%
0%
0%
0%
16%
37%
44%
3%
0%
0%
0%
21%
47%
32%
0%
0%
0%
0%
20%
57%
23%
0%
0%
0%
0%
10%
90%
<100
100-150
150-200
200-300
300-400
>400
27%
67%
6%
1%
1%
0%
0%
46%
52%
2%
0%
0%
0%
1%
54%
45%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2%
81%
17%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3%
68%
29%
0%
0%
0%
1%
7%
92%
2022
2023
Source:McKinseyChinaAutoConsumerSurvey(2023&24)McKinsey&Company
McKinseyChinaAutoConsumerInsights20245
Theshareofconsumersseekingadowngradehasfallensignificantly
Inlastyear’sreport1,manyconsumersineachpricesegmentsaidtheyplannedtopurchasetheirnextcarinalower-pricesegment.However,inthelatestsurvey,amuchsmallershareofrespondentsexpressedthesameintention(Exhibit3).AmongthecarownerswhoseexistingcarispricedatRMB150,000orless,theshareseekingalowerpricedecreasedtozerofrom12percentin2022.InthesegmentofRMB150,000toRMB400,000,theshareofthose
intendingtopaylessdroppedfromabout20percentin2022toabout2percentin2023.
Exhibit3
Theshareofconsumersplanningtodowngradeissignificantlylowerin2023thanin2022
Consumersexpectingto“downgrade”bypriceofcarcurrentlyowned
%ofrespondents,RMBthousands
20222023
20
16
12
10
8
0
1
2
3
21
100-150150-200200-300300-400>400
Source:McKinseyChinaAutoConsumerSurvey(2023&24)McKinsey&Company
Twofactorsseemlikelytohavecontributedtothesignificantdecreaseoftheshareofthosewhotendtodowngrade:
—Consumersshowrelativelystrongerenthusiasmandconfidencefornew-carpurchasesinthepost-pandemicera.
—ChinaautomakerscontinuetointroducehighlycompetitivenewmodelsofsmartEVs.
In2023,morethan40newEVmodelswerelaunchedinthepricesegmentaboveRMB200,000alone,andalmostallmodelswereequippedwithfeaturessuchascomfort,
infotainmentfunctions,autonomousdriving(AD),smartcockpit,andultra-fastcharging.Asthesenewmodels’attractivenesstoconsumersgraduallyincreases,consumersshifttheirattentiontomodelsinhigher-pricesegmentsorstayinthesamepricesegmentoftheirexistingvehicleinsteadofseekingalower-pricedvehicle.
1ThomasFang,MingyuGuan,BillPeng,andTonyZhou,“McKinseyChinaAutoConsumerInsights2023,”July2023.
6McKinseyChinaAutoConsumerInsights2024
PricecompetitionthathasbeenoccurringinChinahashadalimitedimpactonstimulatingconsumption
CompetitionbasedonpriceisgraduallyintensifyingintheChinaautomarket.Withmind-blowinghigh-techfunctions(forexample,cityareanavigation-on-autopilot,advanced
smartvoiceassistant,electricsuctiondoors,800Varchitecture,ultra-fastcharging,andair
suspension)atattractiveprices,thenewlylaunchedmodelskeeprefreshingconsumers’priceperceptions.Didtheintensifyingpricecompetitionstimulatethedesiretopurchaseanew
car,ordiditsimplyhelpcreateagroupofconsumerswhowanttowaitonthesidelines?
Oursurveyaskedconsumershowthepricecompetitionhasaffectedtheirdecisionaboutpurchasinganewcar.Theresponsessuggestthatthattheimpactwaslimited:
—Thelargestshareofconsumers(64.1percent)saytheyareneutral,meaningthepricecompetitiondoesnotaffecttheirpurchasedecision(Exhibit4).
—Another16.4percentsaytheimpactisnegative―thatis,thepricecompetitionwillinhibitordelaytheirpurchase.
—Theremaining19.4percentexpressapositiveimpact,meaningthepricecompetitionhasboostedoracceleratedtheirpurchasedecisions.
Exhibit4
Pricecompetitionhaslimitedimpactonconsumers,withmorethan80percentofconsumersreportnopositiveroleforpricecompetitionintheirpurchase
decisions
‘Doesthepricecompetitionmakeapositiveornegativeimpacttoyournewcarpurchasedecision?’
Consumerattitudestowardsthepricecompetition
%ofrespondents
64.1
Neutral:Hasno
impacton
purchasedecision
Negative:Makesmemorehesitanttomakepurchasedecision
16.4
Positive:
19.4
Triggersoraccelerates
Total
purchasedecision
100.0
80.5%
ofconsumers
reportingnopositiveimpactfromprice
competitionon
purchasedecision
Source:McKinseyChinaAutoConsumerSurvey(2023&24)McKinsey&Company
McKinseyChinaAutoConsumerInsights20247
Theproportionofrespondentssayingtheimpactispositiveisaboutthreepercentage
pointshigherthanthepercentagereportinganegativeimpact.Asaresult,pricecompetitionappearstohavestimulatedtheoverallChinacarmarket,butonlyslightly.Inaddition,the
segmentsreportinganeutralornegativeimpacttotalmorethan80percentofrespondents,meaningmostpeoplesurveyedobservenopositiveroleofpricecompetitionintheirpurchasedecisions.Theevidencepointstoalimitedoverallimpactofcompetingonprice.
Theimpactofpricecompetitionvariesaccordingtothepriceofrespondents’currently
ownedcars.Inthelow-pricesegment,moreconsumersciteanegativeimpactthanapositiveone,andinthemiddle-pricesegment,thedifferencebetweenpositiveandnegativeimpactisonly3.1percentagepoints(Exhibit5).Thenetimpact(positiveminusnegative)isgreatestforthepricesegmentaboveRMB300,000,at4.4percentagepoints.Weinterpretthistomeanthatconsumersinthelowandmediumpricesegments,facingastretchofpricecompetition,aremorelikelytoexpectfurtheraggressivepricecuts,sotheyadoptawait-and-seeattitude.Consumersinthehigh-pricesegmenthavestrongerpurchasingpowerandcanrespond
morepositivelytofavorableprices.
Exhibit5
Pricecompetitionhavelimitednetimpactforvolumesegmentconsumers,andmayevenresultinlosses
‘Doesthepricecompetitionmakeapositiveornegativeimpacttoyournewcarpurchasedecision?’
Consumerattitudestowardsthepricecompetition(bypriceofcarcurrentlyowned)
%ofrespondents
100%
Neutral:Hasnoimpactonpurchasedecision
Negative:Makesmemorehesitanttomakepurchasedecision
Positive:Triggersoracceleratespurchasedecision
Netimpactcausedby
pricecompetition,positiveviewsminusnegative
views,percentagepoints
57.6%
61.6%
71.8%
21.9%
17.6%
11.9%
20.5%
20.8%
16.3%
<100100~300>300Priceofcar
currently
owned,RMBthousands
-1.4%3.1%4.4%
Source:McKinseyChinaAutoConsumerSurvey2024McKinsey&Company
8McKinseyChinaAutoConsumerInsights2024
2
PerceptionsofEVandICEbrands
arediverging
Keyinsights:
—Consumers’brandperceptionshavesignificantlydiverged:theirinitialconsiderationsetdiffersaccordingtothebrandortypeofcartheyown
—WhilepremiumChineseEVbrandshavesuccessfullyattractedconsumerswith
theircompetitiveedgeinsmartification,manyownersoftraditionalpremiumMNCbrandsareswitchingtopremiumChineseEVbrands
—Consumers’perceptionsofChinesecarbrandshavegreatlyimprovedalongbothtraditionalandemergingevaluationdimensions,whilethebrandhalooftraditionalmultinationalcompany(MNC)playersisincreasinglychallenged
—NearlyhalfofChineseconsumersarereluctanttopayhighpremiumsforMNCbrands,andtheproportionisincreasing
McKinseyChinaAutoConsumerInsights20249
Consumers’brandperceptionshavesignificantlydiverged;theirinitialconsiderationsetdiffers
accordingtothebrandortypeofcartheyown
CompetitioninChina’spassengervehiclemarketisgettingmoreandmoreintense.Several
leadingnewEVbrandsaregainingconsiderabletraction,whilesomeweak,oldbrandsare
phasedout.Overthepastthreeyears,16newbrandshaveenteredtheautosector,eachwithamarketsharegreaterthan0.1percent.Inthemeantime,sevenoldbrandshavegradually
vanishedfromthesightofconsumers(Exhibit6).
Exhibit6
CompetitioninChinapassengervehiclemarketisintensifyingasnewbrandscatchupandoldbrandsarephasedout
MajorbrandsintheChineseautomarket1
BrandswithMS>2%BrandswithMS0.5%-2%BrandswithMS0.1%-0.5%
1670
60
61
4
16
12
18
13
7
7brandsallwithmarketshare
(MS)of0.1%-0.5%in2020
Among16new
brands,4brandshaveanMSof
0.5%-2%in2023;12brandshave
anMSof0.1%-0.5%in2023
20
20
16
34
28
26
201520BrandsphasedoutNewbrands2023
1.Onlyincludethebrandswithmarketshareover0.1%,whichoverallaccountforover99%ofChinatotalPVmarket.Source:ChinaNewCarInsuranceRegistrationDatabase
McKinsey&Company
Assignificantchangestakeplaceinthebrandlandscape,howwillconsumerperceptionsofindividualbrandsevolve?Respondents’answerstoseveralsurveyquestionsshedsomelightonthisquestion.
10McKinseyChinaAutoConsumerInsights2024
Whenconsumersconsiderpurchasingacar,theydevelopaninitialconsiderationset(ICS),
collectmoreinformationabouteachbrandinthatICS,andthenmakepurchasedecisions.
Accordingtoourprevioussurveys,aconsumer’sICScontainsjustafewbrands—twotothreeonaverage—andthebrandpurchased,regardlessofpowertraintype,usuallycomesfrom
theirICS(Exhibit7).Itisnoteworthythatwhiletheaveragenumberofbrandsinconsumers’ICSisroughlyunchanged,thelikelihoodofthefinalpurchasecomingfromthatsetofbrandshasincreasedconsiderably.Inotherwords,consumers’purchasedecisionsaregettingmorefocused.OEMscanbenefitfromthistrendbyworkingmoreactivelytoputtheirbrandsintoconsumers’ICSandcaptureagreatermindsharewhenconsumersdevelopanintentionto
purchaseacar.
Exhibit7
Although#ofoptionalbrandsincreases,ChineseconsumerscontinuetokeepashallowICS(initialconsiderationset)
ICStypicallyonlyincludes2-3brands......85%offinaldecisionsarefromICS
NumberofbrandsinICS,#ofbrands
2.9
2.7
2.5
2.8
201921222023
%finaltransactionswithinICS
20222023
85%
87%
79%
77%
ICEonwersEVowners
Source:McKinseyChinaAutoConsumerSurveyacrosstheyearsMcKinsey&Company
Amorein-depthanalysisofthedatashowsthatICSmixesvaryfordifferentgroupsof
consumers.Forexample,consumerswhopurchasedamassbrandvehicleoverthepastsixmonthsdifferintheirconsiderationofMNCversusChinesemassbrands(Exhibit8):
McKinseyChinaAutoConsumerInsights202411
Exhibit8
ConsumersinthemassbrandsegmentshowdifferentconsiderationinICS(initialconsiderationset)
ICSmixofdifferentgroupsofcustomerswhopurchasedanewcarinthepast6months
%orrespondents
Atleast1traditionalmassMNCbrandinICS
Atleast1traditionalmassChinesebrandinICS
TraditionalmassMNCbrandbuyers
98%
48%
Traditionalmass
ChineseICEbuyers
53%
96%
TraditionalmassChineseEVbuyers
48%
95%
Source:McKinseyChinaAutoConsumerSurvey2024McKinsey&Company
—AmongrespondentswhopurchasedtraditionalmassMNCbrands,traditionalmassMNCbrandsappearinnearly100percentofrespondents’ICSs,butChinesemassbrandsarepresentinonlyabout50percent.
—AmongthosewhopurchasedtraditionalmassChinesebrands,theoppositeholds:traditionalmassMNCbrandsappearinonlyabout50percentofrespondents’ICSs,whereastraditionalmassChinesebrandsappearinnearly100percent.
12McKinseyChinaAutoConsumerInsights2024
Inthisexample,thedifferencesinICSmixbetweenthedifferentgroupsofmassbrand
vehicleownerstendstobeconsistentwithrespondents’highlydivergentbrandperceptions,includingtheirawarenessofChineseandMNCbrands(Exhibit9):
—FortherespondentswhoowntraditionalmassMNCbrands,thetopfivemostrecognizedmassbrandsareallMNCbrands.
—TheownersoftraditionalmassChinesebrandsincludetwoChinesebrandsintheir
choicesofthetopfivemostrecognizedmassbrands.Also,theyaremuchlesslikelytorecognizetop-rankingMNCbrandsthantheownersofMNCmassbrandsare.
Exhibit9
Asimilarperception-divergeishappeningtomasssegmentICEconsumers’brandrecognition
Top5mostrecognizedICEbrands(mass)bydifferentgroupsofcustomers
%ofrespondents
TraditionalmassChinesebrand
TraditionalmassMNCbrandowners
MassGermanbrand
60
MassJapanesebrand
32
MassJapanesebrand
31
MassUSbrand
22
MassUSbrand
16
TraditionalmassChinesebrandowners
MassGermanbrand
32
MassJapanesebrand
18
MassJapanesebrand
16
MassChinesebrand
12
MassChinesebrand
12
Source:McKinseyChinaAutoConsumerSurvey2024McKinsey&Company
McKinseyChinaAutoConsumerInsights202413
SimilardifferencesinICSmixanddivergenceofbrandperceptionsaremoreevidentinthesurveyresultscollectedfrompremiumbrandowners:
—AmongrespondentswhopurchasedthreemajorpremiumGermanbrands,the
appearancerateofthesethreebrandsintheirICSisnearly100percentforICEvehicleownersandnearly90percentforEVowners(Exhibit10).Incontrast,fewpremium
ChineseEVbrandswereintheseconsumers’ICS:almostzeroforICEvehiclebuyersandlessthanone-thirdforEVbuyers.
—Incontrast,consumerswhopurchasedpremiumChineseEVbrandsrarelyincludethe
threepremiumGermanbrands(appearancerateof14percent).Andfortheseowners,theICSappearancerateofpremiumChineseEVbrandsis91percent.
Exhibit10
Consumersinthepremiumvehiclesegmentalsoshowsignificantly-differentconsiderationinICS
ICSmixofdifferentgroupsofcustomerswhopurchasedanewcarinthepast6months
%orrespondents
Atleast1premium
GermanbrandinICS
Atleast1
premiumChineseEVbrandinICS
ICEbuyersof3majorpremiumGermanbrands1
96%
3%
EVbuyersof3majorpremiumGermanbrands1
89%
30%
PremiumChineseEVbuyers2
14%
91%
1.Incl.buyersof3majorpremiumGermanbrands.2.Incl.buyersof6premiumChineseEVbrands.
Source:McKinseyChinaAutoConsumerSurvey2024
McKinsey&Company
14McKinseyChinaAutoConsumerInsights2024
ThedistinctdifferencesinICSmixbetweenpremiumsegmentownersarealsoconsistentwiththeirdivergentbrandperceptions(Exhibit11):
—Respondents,whenaskedtoidentifythebrandstheyconsider“premium”,regardlessofpowertraintype,mentiononlytraditionalMNCbrandsknownfortheirICEvehicles.
—WhenaskedtofocusonpremiumEVbrands,respondentsmostoftenmentionthree
emergingEVbrands(thatis,brandsthatsellonlyEVmodels).ThetoppositionisoccupiedbyanAmericanEVbrand,followedbytwoChineseEVbrands.ThethreepremiumGermanbrandsofferingbothEVandICEvehiclesrankfourth,fifthandseventh.
Exhibit11
ThehugedifferenceinICS-mixamongdifferentvehiclegroupsiscausedbyconsumers’divergingperceptionsonpremiumbetweenICEvs.EV
Top10brandsviewedas“premiumbrand(regardlessofpowertraintype)”
amongconsumers
%ofrespondents
50
23
13
69
63
53
20
17
17
14
Premium
Premium
Premium
Premium
Premium
Premium
Premium
Premium
Premium
Premium
German
German
German
German
Italybrand
British
USbrand
British
British
Japanese
brand
brand
brand
brand
brand
brand
brand
brand
Top10brandsviewedas“premiumEVbrand"amongconsumers
%ofrespondents
EVbrands50
42
34
29
26
24
20
17
1616
Premium
Premium
Premium
Premium
Premium
Chinese
Premium
Premium
Premium
Premium
USEV
Chinese
Chinese
German
German
EVbrand
German
Chinese
Chinese
Chinese
brand
EVbrand
EVbrand
brand
brand
brand
EVbrand
EVbrand
EVbrand
Source:McKinseyChinaAutoConsumerSurvey2024McKinsey&Company
EventheconsumerswhoownamajorpremiumGermanbrandrankthesethreeGermanbrandsbehindtheAmericanEVbrandandtwoChineseEVbrands(Exhibit12).
McKinseyChinaAutoConsumerInsights202415
Exhibit12
Evenownersofthe3majorGermanbrandownersconsiderEVbrandsmorepremiumintheEVdomain
Top10brandsviewedas“premiumEVbrand"among3majorGermanbrandowners
%ofrespondents
44
3535
3131
EVbrands
28
23
21
1414
Premium
Premium
Premium
Premium
Premium
Chinese
Premium
Premium
Premium
Premium
USEV
Chinese
Chinese
German
German
EVbrand
German
Chinese
Korean
Japanese
brand
EVbrand
EVbrand
brand
brand
brand
EVbrand
brand
brand
Source:McKinseyChinaAutoConsumerSurvey2024McKinsey&Company
Throughfurtherresearch,wefoundthatselectioncriteriadifferamongownersofpremiumvehiclesbearingdifferentbrands.RespondentswhoownpremiumChineseEVindicate
thattheychosepremiumChineseEVbrandsprimarilybecausesuchbrandswieldtechnicaladvantagesinAD,smartcockpit,andoriginalEVplatforms(Exhibit13).
Interestingly,whenownersoftraditionalpremiumMNCEVwereaskedsimilarquestions,
theyoftenidentifyabrand-relatedreasonasthekeyconsiderationfortheirdecision.SuchresponsesincludesapreferenceforthetraditionalpremiumMNCbrandsandalackof
confidenceinpremiumChineseEVbrands(Exhibit14).
16McKinseyChinaAutoConsumerInsights2024
Exhibit13
SmartfeaturesarecorereasonsconsumersgiventobuyEVfrompremiumChineseEVbrands
ReasonsforbuyingEVfrompremiumChineseEVbrands,vstraditionalpremiumMNCbrands
%ofrespondents1
SmartificationfeaturesBranding
BetterADperformance
BettersmartcockpitperformanceAttractiveexteriordesign
NativeEVplatform
Biggerspace&comfort
Convenientaftersalesservice
BetterOTA(over-the-airupdate)capability
Technologytoaddressrangeanxiety(e.g.batteryswapping,REEV2)
BrandingoftraditionalpremiumMNCbrandsmeaninglesstome
Betterdrivingperformance
62
51
51
47
43
40
42
39
39
65
1.Incl.ownersof6premiumChineseEVbrands.
2.Rangeextendedelectricvehicle.
Source:McKinseyChinaAutoConsumerSurvey2024McKinsey&Company
McKinseyChinaAutoConsumerInsights202417
Exhibit14
…whilethetraditionalpremiumEVbuyersaretriggeredbybrandingeffects
ReasonsforbuyingEVfromtraditionalpremiumMNCbrands,vspremiumChineseEVbrands
%ofrespondents1
Branding
Trustonquality
Attractiveexteriordesign
EVplayersmaygobankruptcy
Attractivepriceduetodiscounts
Owningatraditionalpremiu
温馨提示
- 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
- 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
- 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
- 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
- 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
- 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。
最新文档
- 医疗人才培养项目
- 汽车物流挂靠合同范例
- 美甲起源与发展前景
- 小学生信息道德培养活动方案-小学生信息道德培养活动方案
- 重庆人文科技学院《公共开放空间景观设计》2022-2023学年第一学期期末试卷
- 重庆人文科技学院《电子商务管理》2022-2023学年第一学期期末试卷
- 重庆财经学院《银行法规及职业道德》2023-2024学年第一学期期末试卷
- 2024北京回民学校七年级(上)期中数学(教师版)
- 重庆三峡学院《翻译批评与赏析》2023-2024学年第一学期期末试卷
- 重庆人文科技学院《美国文学史及选读》2022-2023学年第一学期期末试卷
- 设备维保的通风与空调系统维护
- 机票售票培训课件
- 医院进修培训交流
- 《工厂改善报告》课件
- 2024分娩镇痛ppt课件完整版
- 完整版小学低年级学生写话能力培养的研究小课题研究报告
- 智能输水管网优化方案
- 玄武岩纤维项目可行性研究报告
- 视觉冲击设计如何通过设计创造视觉冲击力
- 康复第三期品管圈甘特
- 医疗设备移机服务投标方案
评论
0/150
提交评论