欧洲央行-能源价格冲击、货币政策和不平等(英)_第1页
欧洲央行-能源价格冲击、货币政策和不平等(英)_第2页
欧洲央行-能源价格冲击、货币政策和不平等(英)_第3页
欧洲央行-能源价格冲击、货币政策和不平等(英)_第4页
欧洲央行-能源价格冲击、货币政策和不平等(英)_第5页
已阅读5页,还剩75页未读 继续免费阅读

下载本文档

版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领

文档简介

EUROPEANCENTRALBANK

EUROSYSTEM

WorkingPaperSeries

AlinaBobasu,MichaelDobrew,AmaliaRepeleEnergypriceshocks,monetarypolicyandinequality

No2967

Disclaimer:ThispapershouldnotbereportedasrepresentingtheviewsoftheEuropeanCentralBank(ECB).TheviewsexpressedarethoseoftheauthorsanddonotnecessarilyreflectthoseoftheECB.

ECBWorkingPaperSeriesNo29671

Abstract

Westudyhowmonetarypolicyshapestheaggregateanddistributionaleffectsof

anenergypriceshock.Basedontheobservedheterogeneityinconsumptionexpo-surestoenergyandhouseholdwealth,webuildaquantitativesmallopen-economyHANKmodelthatmatchessalientfeaturesoftheEuroAreadata.Ourmodelin-corporatesenergyasbothaconsumptiongoodforhouseholdswithnon-homotheticpreferencesaswellasafactorinputintoproductionwithinputcomplementarities.

Independentlyofpolicyenergypriceshocksalwaysreduceaggregateconsumption.Householdswithlittlewealtharemoreadverselyaffectedthroughbothadeclineinlaborincomeaswellasnegativedirectpriceeffects.Activepolicyresponsesraisingratesinresponsetoinflationamplifiesaggregateoutcomesthroughareductioninaggregatedemand,butspeedsuptherecoverybyenablinghouseholdstorebuildwealththroughhigherreturnsonsavings.However,low-wealthhouseholdsarefur-theradverselyaffectedastheyhavelittlesavingstorebuildwealthfromandinsteadlooseduetofurtherdeclininglaborincome.

Keywords:energyprices,openeconomymodel,heterogeneousagents,monetarypolicy,non-homotheticpreferences.

JEL-Classification:E52,F41,Q43.

ECBWorkingPaperSeriesNo29672

Non-technicalsummary

Inthispaperweinvestigatetheaggregateanddistributionaleffectsofenergypriceshocksandhowtheyareshapedbymonetarypolicy.Basedontheobservedheterogeneityinhouseholdconsumptionexposurestoenergyandwealthpositions,webuildasmallopeneconomyhet-erogeneousagentNewKeynesian(HANK)modelcalibratedtoEuroAreadata.Ourmodelincorporatesenergyasbothaconsumptiongoodforhouseholdswithnon-homotheticprefer-encesaswellasafactorinputintoproductionwithinputcomplementarities.Allenergyusedinthedomesticeconomyhastobeimported.Wecontrast“passive”monetarypolicyresponsesthatkeeptherealinterestrate(nearly)constantwith“active”policyresponsesthatreacttoinflationbystronglyraisingtherealrate.

Ourmainfindingscanbesummarisedasfollows.First,energypriceincreasesadverselyaffectthedomesticeconomyregardlessofthemonetarypolicyresponse.Asallenergyhastobeimported,risingenergypriceseffectivelyconstituteatransferofwealthfromthedomestictotheforeigneconomy.Incontrasttoapassivepolicyresponse,anactivepolicyreactionraisingtherealratetofightinflationimpliesafourtimeslargerdeclineinaggregateconsumption.

Second,weshowthatthedriversoftheaggregateconsumptionresponsediffersubstantiallybetweenactiveandpassivemonetarypolicyresponses.Wedecomposetheaggregateconsump-tionresponseintothreecomponents,adirecteffectstemmingfromchangesintherealinterestrate,anindirecteffectresultingfromchangesinreallaborincome,andarelativepriceeffect.Underapassivepolicyresponse,four-fifthsoftheconsumptiondeclineisattributedtoindirectincomeeffects,whiletherestisdrivenbytherelativepriceeffect.Instarkcontrast,underanactivepolicyresponsethree-fourthsofthedeclineinconsumptionisexplainedbythedirectrealrateeffectandthereforedirectlyrelatedtomonetarypolicy.

Third,low-wealthhouseholdsaregenerallyaffectedthemostbyanenergypriceincrease.Absentanypolicyresponsethedeclineinconsumptionisthreetimeslargerforlow-relativetohigh-wealthhouseholds.Anactivepolicyresponseamplifiestheconsumptiondeclineforallhouseholds.Althoughtherelativedeclineislargerforwealthierhouseholds,theunderlyingdriversdifferstarkly.Low-wealthhouseholdshavetoreduceconsumptionbecauseofthefurtherdeclineinlaborincomeduetofallingeconomicactivity.Incontrast,high-wealthhouseholdschoosetoreducetheirconsumptionbecauseahigherrealrateincentivizesthemtosavemore.

ECBWorkingPaperSeriesNo29673

1Introduction

Energypriceshavereachedhistoricalheights,startingtheirriseinmid-2021aftermosteconomiesreopenedfromCOVID-19lockdownsandbeingcatalysedearly2022bytheRussianinvasionofUkraine.Figure

1

(leftpanel)showsthatrealenergypricesintheEuroAreahaverisenby60percentfromtheirlowsin2020andby30percentcomparedtotheiraverageoverthepast20years.Atthesametime,thetermsoftradedeterioratedwithnegativeimplicationsfordomesticpurchasingpower.DespitetheEuroAreabeinganenergyimporterfacinganexogenousshock,monetarypolicyreactedtotheenergypricesurgebyraisingratesatunprecedentedspeed.Theriseinenergypricesandsubsequentpolicyresponsenaturallyhaveheterogeneouseffectsonhouseholds,withlesswealthyhouseholdslikelybeingaffectedthemost.First,thesehouseholdsaremoreexposedtoenergypricesthroughtheirconsumptionbasketastheyspendalargerfractionoftheirincomeonenergy-relatedgoods(middlepanel).Second,theirlimitedsavingsmakesitdifficultforthemtosmooththeirconsumptioninresponsetotemporarypriceincreases(rightpanel)

.1

Third,low-wealthhouseholdsalmostsolelyrelyonlaborincomeanddonotbenefitfromhigherreturnsonsavings.

Figure1:Energyprices,termsoftrade,households’consumptionexposuresandsavingsacrosstheincomedistribution

permilleofconsumption

50

40

30

20

10

0

Energypricesandthetermsoftrade

130

120

110

100

90

2008

2010

2012

2014

2016

2018

2020

2022

2024

RealenergypricesTermsoftrade(rhs)

102

101

100

99

98

Exposuretoenergyexpenditure

IIIIIIIVV

Incomequantiles

40

percentofdisposableincome

30

20

10

0

Savings

IIIIIIIVV

Incomequantiles

Note:The“realenergyprice”indicatestheratiobetweentheenergycomponentoftheHICPandtheoverallHICPindex.ThetermsoftradeareproxiedbytheratiobetweentheGDPdeflatorandtheprivate

consumptiondeflator.Chartsinthemiddleandrightarebasedondistributionalstatisticsfromthe“Householdbudgetsurvey“andtheexperimental“Income,consumption,andwealth”datasetsprovidedbyEurostat.

Basedontheobservedheterogeneityinhouseholdconsumptionandwealth,webuildasmall

1Formoredetailsonsmalleradjustmentmarginsforlow-incomehouseholdsgiventheirconsumptionbasketandsavingspositions,seealso

HobijnandLagakos

(2005),

Bobasuetal.

(2023)and

BilsandAguiar

(2010)

.

ECBWorkingPaperSeriesNo29674

openeconomyheterogeneousagentNewKeynesian(HANK)modeltoanalysetheaggregateanddistributionaleffectsofenergypriceincreasesandhowtheseeffectsareshapedbymonetarypolicy.Weshowfirst,thatanenergypriceshockisalwaysrecessionaryinanopeneconomythatimportsallenergybecauseitconstitutesawealthtransferfromthedomestictotheforeigneconomy.Second,theinitialadverseaggregateeffectsaresmallerwhenmonetarypolicyremains“passive”,i.e.keepstherealrateconstant.“Active”monetarypolicyreactingtoinflationbyraisingtherealrateexacerbatestheinitialnegativeeffects,yetimpliesafasterrecovery.Bydecomposingtheaggregateconsumptionresponseweshowthatunderapassivepolicythenegativeeffectsofenergypriceshocksmainlyarisethroughnegativerealincomeeffects.Incontrast,underanactivepolicyconsumptiondeclinespredominantlyduetoarisingrealrateinsteadoftheshockitself.Third,low-wealthhouseholdsareaffectedthemostbyanenergypriceshock.Activepolicyexacerbatesnegativeeffectsforlow-wealthhouseholdsthroughafurtherdeclineinlaborincome,butbenefitshigh-wealthhouseholdsthroughhigherreturnsonsavings.

Inoursmallopeneconomymodelenergyfeaturesasbothaconsumptiongoodandafactorinputtoproduction.Allenergyusedinthedomesticeconomyhastobeimported.Householdshavenon-homotheticpreferencesoverenergyandnon-energygoodsmodelledasaStone-Gearyutilityfunction.Theyfaceidiosyncraticincomeriskthattheycanonlyimperfectlyinsureagainstduetoanoccasionallybindingborrowingconstraint.Firmsproducedomesticgoodsutilizinglaborandenergyasinputs,withlimitedsubstitutabilitybetweenthem.Whilepricesareflexibleweintroducestickywagesthroughlaborunions.WemodelmonetarypolicyasaTaylorrule,whichcanreacteithertocontemporaneousinflationmeasuresortheirforecasts.Thesemeasuresincludeheadlineinflation,definedasthechangeinaggregateprices,coreinflation,definedasthechangeindomesticgoodsprices,andenergypriceinflation.Wecontrasttheseruleswithabaselinepolicythatremainspassivebykeepingtherealrateconstant.

WecalibrateourmodeltodatafromtheEuroAreainordertoquantifytheaggregateanddistributionaleffectsofanenergypriceshock.Wetakeparticularcareinmatchingthehetero-geneityobservedinhouseholdconsumptionbaskets.InparticularweuseEurostat’s“Householdbudgetsurvey(HBS)”and“Income,wealthandconsumptionstatistics”(ICWS)tomatchanaveragehouseholdexpenditureonenergyofaround9percentandmatchthedegreeofnon-homotheticitytotargethigherenergyexpendituresofthelowestincomequintileofaround13percent.Additionally,wetargetanaverageaggregatemarginalpropensitytoconsumeofaround0.3deliveringsubstantialincomeandwealthheterogeneityinourmodel.Onthefirm

ECBWorkingPaperSeriesNo29675

side,wecalibratethedegreeofcomplementaritybetweenfactorinputstorecentestimatesin

Bachmannetal.

(2022)andadditionallytakeintoaccountinformationbasedoninput-output

tablesindicatingthattheenergyuseinproductionisnearlydoublethatofconsumption.

Westartbyillustratingtheimportanceofnon-homotheticpreferencesandinputcomplemen-taritiesfortheaggregateandindividualconsumptionandincomeresponsetoanenergypriceshockunderourbaselinepassivepolicy.Non-homotheticityimposesaconstraintonlow-wealthhouseholds,whileelasticitiesofsubstitutioninconsumptionandproductiongoverntheabilityofhouseholdsandfirmstorespondtotheshockinrelativeprices.Weshowthatlesswealthyhouseholdssufferalargerconsumptionexpenditureshockcomparedtowealthyhouseholds,therebyfurtherraisingtheiralreadyelevatedmarginalpropensitytoconsume(MPC).Whentheelasticityofsubstitutionacrossconsumptiongoodsislarge,theenergypriceshockislesssevereforallhouseholdsastheyareabletosubstituteawayfrommoreexpensiveenergygoodstowardscheaperdomesticgoods.Similarly,ahighelasticityofsubstitutionintheproductionfunctionallowsfirmstodecreasetheirdemandforenergyandthereforemitigatesthedeclineinlabordemand,predominantlybenefitinglow-wealthhouseholds.

Turningtotheaggregateeffectsofanenergypriceshockweshowthestrongdependenceonthemonetarypolicyresponse.Wecontrastabaselineinwhichmonetarypolicykeepstherealrateconstant,i.e.isfullypassive,topolicyruleswhichreacteithertocontemporaneousorforecastmeasuresofinflation.Inouropeneconomymodel,whereallenergyisimported,anenergypriceshockisalwaysrecessionaryregardlessofthepolicyresponse,asthebenefitsfromhigherenergypricessolelyaccruetotheforeigneconomy.Incontrasttothepassivebaseline,apolicyrespondingtoeithercontemporaneousheadlineorcoreinflationraisesrealinterestrates.Higherrealratesinturninduceastrongdeclineinconsumptionandoutputthatisfourtimesbiggerthanunderthebaseline.Rulesrespondingtoeitherforecastmeasuresofheadlineorcoreinflationinsteadeffectively“lookthrough”theinitialenergypriceincrease.Realratesriseverylittleunderthese“passive”responses,therebyalleviatingmostofthenegativeeffectsonaggregatedemand.Inturn,thedeclineinbothconsumptionandlaborincomeislesspronouncedcomparedtothebaselinerulewithotherwiseverysimilarimplications.Respondingtoenergyinflationhasremarkablydifferentimplications.Undersuchapolicy,theincreaseintherealrateisthehighestwithaninitialcompletesuppressionofenergyandthereforeheadlineinflation.However,thiscomesatthecostofastrongrecessionthatisinitiallysignificantlylargerthanunderaheadlinerule.Additionally,completelycontaininginflationintheshorttermcomes

ECBWorkingPaperSeriesNo29676

atthecostofhigherinflationinthemedium-term,whenaspeedyrecoveryofdomesticgoodsdemandtogetherwithrisingforeigndemandultimatelyraisescoreandheadlineinflation.

Byanalyzingthedriversoftheaggregateconsumptionresponseweshowthatthenegativeeffectsofanenergypriceshockstemfromindirectnegativerealincomeeffectsbutarestronglyexacerbatedunderanactivepolicyresponsethroughdirectrealrateeffects.Wedecomposetheconsumptionresponseintoadirecteffectarisingfromchangesintherealinterestrate,anindirecteffectarisingfromchangesinlaborincomeandarelativepriceeffect.Thelattercapturesadeclineinconsumptionarisingfromtheenergypriceshock,causinghigherexpendituresonsubsistenceconsumptiontherebyleavingasmallershareofincomeforconsumptionbeyondthesubsistencelevel.Underafixedrealrate,four-fifthsandthereforethemajorityoftheconsumptiondeclineisduetoindirectincomeeffectswhereasonefourthisdrivenbytherelativepriceeffect.Sincemonetarypolicyispassive,therearenodirectrealrateeffects.Thisimpliesthattheadverseeffectsofanenergypriceshockworkpredominantlythroughareductioninrealincomewithanadditionalmarginforrisingcostsoftheconsumptionbasket.Instarkcontrast,underanactivepolicyresponse,three-fourthsofthedeclineinconsumptionisaccountedforbythedirecteffectandthereforedirectlyrelatedtotheriseintherealrate.Forecastrulesthataresufficientlypassivetriggeronlyasmallincreaseinrealrateswhichpositivelycontributestoaggregateconsumptionbyprovidinghigherreturnsonsavingswithoutadverseeffectsonaggregatedemandandthereforelaborincome.

Finally,weshowthatlow-wealthhouseholdsaregenerallyaffectedthemostbyanenergypriceshock.Absentanypolicyresponsethedeclineintheirconsumptionisthreetimeslargerrelativetohigh-wealthhouseholds.Anactivepolicyresponseamplifiestheconsumptionde-clineforallhouseholds.Althoughthisdeclineislargerforwealthierhouseholds,thedriveroftheunderlyingconsumptionstarklydifferbetweenlow-andhigh-wealthhouseholds.Low-wealthhouseholdshavetoreduceconsumptionbecauseofthestrongdeclineinlaborincome.Incontrast,wealthyhouseholdsoptimallychoosetoreducetheirconsumptionbecausehigherrealratesincentivizethemtosavemore.Forthesehouseholdspriceeffectsareimmaterialandlaborincomeeffectsarealotsmallerthanforlow-wealthhouseholds.Apassivepolicyresponseinsteaddoesnotinducea(strong)responseofrealratesandtherebydoesnotcauseastrongconsumptiondeclineforwealthyhouseholdsastheenergyshockitselfdoesnotsubstantiallyaf-fectthem.However,low-wealthhouseholdssubstantiallybenefitfromapassivepolicyresponsebecauseofthestronglymitigatedadverseeffectsonlaborincomeassociatedwithsuchapolicy.

ECBWorkingPaperSeriesNo29677

RelatedliteratureWerelatetothreemainstrandsoftheliteratureinvestigatingtheaggre-gateanddistributionaleffectsofenergyshocksinopeneconomymodels,includingtheimplica-tionsandpropagationmechanismsunderdifferentmonetarypolicyconducts.Thecoreanalysisbuildsonanestablishedbodyofliteraturewhichfocusesonthetransmissionofoilpriceshocks

inopen-economyrepresentative-agentmodels(Mendoza,

1995;

Kose,

2002

andmorerecently

BaqaeeandFarhi,

2019)includingtheappropriatemonetarypolicyresponse(Bodensteinetal.,

2011;

Natal,

2012)

.

BlanchardandGali

(2007)studythepropagationofoilpricesinanopen

economyrepresentativeagentmodel,byincludingoilintheproductionfunctioninordertoaccountfortheroleofintermediateproductionfactors.

Bernankeetal.

(1997)conductcounter

-factualmonetarypolicysimulationsandconcludethatmonetarypolicysignificantlyinfluencesthetransmissionofoilpriceshocksintheeconomy.

Bodensteinetal.

(2011)useaNewKeyne

-sianmodelwithoilinconsumptionandproductiontoexaminetheeffectsofdifferentmonetarypoliciesinresponsetoenergyshocks,bydistinguishingbetweencoreandheadlineinflation.Theauthorsfindanoptimalresponsetoanadverseenergysupplyshockinvolvesapersistentriseincoreandheadlineinflation.

Bodensteinetal.

(2013)usingthesamemodelfindthattheeffects

ofoilshocksonaggregatedemandarerathercushionedwhenmonetarypolicyisconstrainedbythezerolowerboundcomparedtonormaltimeswhenmonetarypolicyisunconstrained.

Natal

(2012)inanoptimalpolicydesignarguesthatpolicieswhichperfectlystabilizeprices

entailsignificantwelfarecosts.Weaddtothisliteraturebystudyingenergypriceshocksinasimilaropeneconomysettingbutwithafocusonhouseholdheterogeneitywhichallowsustoalsostudydistributionaleffectsofenergypriceshocksandhowtheyrelatetodifferentmonetarypolicyresponses.Morerecently,

GagliardoneandGertler

(2023)haveestimatedaNewKeyne

-sianmodelincorporatingoilandshowingthatstudyingoilpriceshocksandmonetarypolicycombinedprovidesagooddescriptionoftherecentaggregatedata.Whileallthesepapersfocusonaggregateoutcomes,

DelCantoetal.

(2023)notablydevelopanempiricalframeworktoan

-alyzetheimpactofinflationaryshocksthroughoutthedistribution,separatelystudyingenergyandmonetarypolicyshocks.Ourpapercanbeunderstoodasastructuralcounterparttotheirempiricalapproach,withafocusonhowtheeffectsofenergyshocksareshapedbymonetarypolicy.Despitethedifferencesinapproaches,wesimilarlyconcludethatenergypriceshocksaregenerallyregressiveandthatthemonetarypolicyresponsecanhaveasubstantialimpactinshapingtheseeffects.

Wealsorelatetoagrowingliteratureanalyzingthedomesticeffectsofshocksemergingin

ECBWorkingPaperSeriesNo29678

foreigneconomiesinthecontextofopen-economyheterogeneousagent(HA)models.

deFerra

etal.

(2020)quantifytheaggregateanddistributionaleffectsofcapitalflowreversalsinHungary,

whereagentsholddifferentamountsofforeigncurrencydebt.

Guoetal.

(2020)studythe

distributionaleffectsofinternationalshockswhenagentsdifferbytheirsectorofworkandtheirfinancialintegration,findingthatthesesourcesofheterogeneitycanplayamajorroleandcreatetrade-offsintheconductofmonetarypolicy.Otherrecentpapersstudyingtheredistributiveeffectsofexternalshocksinclude

Zhou

(2020),

Oskolkov

(2022)and

Otten

(2021)

.

Cugat

(2019)

introduceshouseholdheterogeneityinanopen-economyNewKeynesianmodelandstudyitsroleinthetransmissionofforeignshocks.

Auclertetal.

(2019)studymonetarytransmissionin

anopen-economyHANK,providinggeneralconditionsunderwhichhouseholds’heterogeneitymattersemphasizingthepresenceofastrongreal-incomechannelthatcanleadtocontractionarydevaluations.

Guntinetal.

(2020)showhowintroducinghouseholdheterogeneitycaninform

macroeconomictheoriesofaggregateconsumptionadjustmenttosuddenstops.Wecontributetothisliteraturebyexplicitlystudyingenergypriceshocksandtheiraggregateanddistributionalconsequencesaddingmonetarypolicyasasourceimpactingforeignshocks.

Third,wecontributetoanemergingliteraturestudyingenergyshocksinmacroeconomicmodelswithatleastsomedegreeofhouseholdheterogeneity.

Chanetal.

(2022)focusonthe

productionsidehighlightingthedemandspilloversarisingfrominputcomplementarityinatwo-agentNewKeynesianmodel.Theyshowthatahighercomplementarityleadstoastrongerdeclineinlabordemandhurtingconstrainedhouseholdsmoreandadditionallystudyoptimalpolicyinthissettingwithlimitedheterogeneity.Whilealsomodellinginputcomplementary,weinsteademphasizethedemandsideheterogeneityinbothconsumptionandincomeinafully-fledgedHANKmodelandcomparehowdifferentmonetarypolicyrulesbenefitorhurtdifferenthouseholdsalongtheincomedistribution.

Gornemannetal.

(2023)usingasimilar

twoagentmodelstudyhowsupplyshortagescanleadtoself-fulfillingfluctuationsandanalyzehowmonetarypolicycanremovedeterminacyrisks.Inarecentpaper,

Olivietal.

(2023)study

howmonetarypolicyshouldreacttoaggregateandsectoraldisruptionsinamulti-sectorNewKeynesianmodel.Theyfocusonananalyticalderivationoftwowedgesrelatedtoheteroge-neousconsumptionexpenditureswhenhouseholdshavenon-homotheticpreferencesandshowthatappliedtoUKdatathesewedgesarequantitativelyimportant.Wedifferfromtheirpa-perbyexplicitlymodellingenergyandconsideringshockstoenergypricesinsteadofaggregateproductivity.Asweshow,energypriceshockshaveconsiderablydifferentaggregateanddistri-

ECBWorkingPaperSeriesNo29679

butionalimplicationscomparedtoothersupplyshocks.Additionally,theirfocusontractableheterogeneityprecludesthemtofullystudydistributionaleffectsaswedoinourmodel.

Au-

dzeiandSut´oris

(2023)similarlyuseatractableheterogeneousagentmodel,albeitstudyingthe

incentivestoinvestinenergyabatementcapitalinresponsetoanenergypriceshock.Perhapstheclosestpaperstooursare

Auclertetal.

(2023)and

Pieroni

(2023)

.

Pieroni

(2023)builds

aclosedeconomyHANKmodeltostudyhowashocktoenergysupplyaffectsmacroeconomicoutcomes.Weinsteademployanopeneconomymodelandinnovatebyexplicitlystudyingdif-ferentmonetarypolicyrulesandhowtheyaffectbothaggregateanddistributionaloutcomes,alsostudyingthedriversofindividualconsumptionresponsesandhowtheydifferacrossthewealthdistribution.

Auclertetal.

(2023)similarlybuildanopeneconomyHANKmodelwith

differencesinthemodelsetup,e.g.abstractingfrominputcomplementaritiesinproduction.Theystudyhowtheinteractionoffiscalpolicyandmonetarypolicyspecifiedasanexogenousratepathcanmitigateenergypriceshocksalbeitsolelyfocusingonaggregateeffects.WeinsteadexplicitlystudydistributionaloutcomesandspecifymonetarypolicythroughamorecommonlyusedTaylorrulethatendogenouslyreactstoeithercontemporaneousorforecastmeasuresofinflation.

Theremainderofthepaperisorganisedasfollows.InSection

2

wepresentourtheoreticalmodelandinSection

3

wedescribethecalibrationandsteadystateofthemodel.Section

4

focusesontheimplicationsofanenergypriceshockinthecontextofdifferentmonetarypolicyframeworks,highlightingtheroleoftheelasticitiesofsubstitutioninconsumptionandproduction.Thesectionalsoexaminestheaggregateanddistributionaleffectsunderbothabaselinekeepingtherealratefixedandvariousactivepolicyrules.Finally,section

5

concludes.

2Model

InthissectionweintroduceasmallopeneconomyNewKeynesianmodelwithheterogeneoushouseholds.Energyfeaturesasbothaconsumptiongoodaswellasafactorinputtoproduction.Householdshavenon-homotheticpreferencesovernon-energyandenergygoodswithlesswealthyhouseholdsspendingalargershareoftheirincomeonenergy.Productionofnon-energygoodsrequireslaborandenergyasinputswhichcannotbeeasilysubstituted.Alaborunionflexiblysupplieslabortofirmschargingawageratethattheycanonlyinfrequentlychange,whereasgoodspricesareperfectlyflexible.Allenergyhastobeimportedfromabroadandwemodelan

ECBWorkingPaperSeriesNo296710

energycrisisasanexogenousshocktotheforeignpriceofenergy.

2.1Households

EnvironmentTheeconomyispopulatedbyacontinuumofhouseholdsofmeasureone.Householdsareinfinitely-livedandtimeisdiscrete.Thedomesticeconomyispartofacontin-uumofforeigncountriesdistributedovertheunitinterval,eachpopulatedbyarepresentativeforeignagen

温馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
  • 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
  • 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
  • 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
  • 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

评论

0/150

提交评论