版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领
文档简介
WorkingPaperSeriesGlobalandlocaldriversofBitcointradingvis-à-visfiatcurrenciesPaolaDi
Casola,MaurizioMichaelHabib,David
Tercero-LucasNo2868Disclaimer:
Thispapershouldnot
bereportedasrepresentingtheviewsof
theEuropeanCentralBank(ECB).
TheviewsexpressedarethoseoftheauthorsanddonotnecessarilyreflectthoseoftheECB.AbstractWe
analyse
the
drivers
of
Bitcoin
transactions
against
44
fiat
currenciesin
the
largest
peer-to-peer
crypto
exchanges.
Momentum
and
volatility
inthe
cryptoasset
market,
as
well
as
volatility
and
liquidity
in
global
financialmarkets
do
matter
for
Bitcoin
trading.
There
is
suggestive
evidence
of
aglobal
crypto
cycle
driven
by
speculative
motives.
However,
in
emergingand
developing
economies
(EMDEs),
Bitcoin
seems
to
offer
also
transactionalbenefits,
since
trading
increases
when
the
value
of
the
domestic
currency
isunstable.
Proxies
of
banking
depth
and
digitalisation
are
negatively
correlatedwith
the
currency
loadings
on
the
global
factor,
indicating
that
crypto-assetsmay
offer
a
speculative
alternative
to
traditional
finance
when
this
is
notavailable,
especially
in
EMDEs
where
the
share
of
younger
risk-prone
populationis
higher.
Our
results
clearly
point
to
potential
financial
stability
risks
fromcryptoisation
in
EMDEs
with
low
levels
of
financial
development
and
unstablefiat
currencies.JEL
Classification:
E42
F21
F24
F32
F38
G15
O33Keywords:
digital
currencies,
Bitcoin,
peer-to-peer
exchanges,
financialdevelopment.ECBWorkingPaperSeriesNo28681Non-technical
summaryThe
popularity
of
Bitcoin
and
other
cryptocurrencies
has
not
been
confined
tofew
economies,
but
it
has
morphed
into
a
global
phenomenon,
rapidly
spreadingto
economies
with
disparate
levels
of
economic
development
and
financial
literacy.Notably,
Emerging
and
Developing
Economies
(EMDEs)
are
at
the
forefront
ofcrypto
adoption.
There
a
number
of
potential
reasons
behind
the
growing
popularityof
Bitcoin
and
other
cryptocurrencies
in
EMDEs.
First,
cryptocurrencies
may
beused
as
speculative
assets,
which
may
be
particular
attractive
to
investors
fromcountries
where
the
portfolio
choice
of
investment
assets
is
restricted
by
regulatoryor
institutional
factors.
Second,
even
though
prices
have
been
very
volatile,
thesecryptocurrencies
may
represent
a
better
store
of
value
with
respect
to
the
domesticcurrency
of
countries
where
inflation
is
high
and
the
exchange
rate
tends
to
depreciate.Third,
residents
from
EMDEs
may
use
cryptocurrencies
as
a
means
of
payment
incross-border
transactions
to
circumvent
capital
controls
or
to
lower
the
cost
ofreceiving
remittances
from
abroad.
How
this
range
of
explanations
and
drivers
ofcrypto
adoption
maps
into
the
cross-section
of
economies
and
their
characteristicshas
so
far
received
limited
attention,
largely
due
to
data
constraints
and
the
inherentdifficulty
to
track
the
final
owners
of
cryptocurrencies.In
this
study,
we
overcome
the
obstacle
of
limited
country-by-country
informationby
looking
at
fiat
currency
transactions
against
Bitcoin.
The
implied
assumption
isthat
those
trading
currencies
that
are
not
major
international
currencies,
in
particularcurrencies
of
EMDEs,
are
residents
of
the
countries
issuing
that
currency.
We
supportthis
assumption
for
those
transactions
where
data
about
the
residence
of
the
tradersof
Bitcoin
are
available.
Compared
to
previous
studies,
we
analyse
transactionstaking
place
in
peer-to-peer
(P2P)
exchanges,
outside
the
blockchain
network
(i.e.they
are
off-chain).
These
P2P
exchanges
have
an
important
peculiarity:
they
targetmainly
small
retail
users.
In
these
P2P
exchanges,
bid-ask
spreads
tend
to
be
large
sothat
these
exchanges
are
usually
not
affected
by
the
problem
of
market
manipulation,such
as
wash
trading,
typical
of
centralized
exchanges,
thus
making
the
transactionswe
analyse
more
reliable.
The
growth
in
cryptocurrency
markets
in
recent
years
hastaken
place
particularly
through
off-chain
transactions
and,
in
EMDEs,
especiallyin
P2P
exchanges.1
Specifically,
we
analyse
trading
volumes
of
Bitcoin
versus
thecurrencies
of
14
Advanced
Economies
(AEs)
–
excluding
the
US
dollar
due
to
its1While
on-chain
transactions
occur
on
the
blockchain
network
and
need
to
be
validated
byminers,
off-chain
transactions
are
conducted
outside
the
blockchain
network,
making
them
-
ingeneral
-
faster
and
cheaper.
Off-chain
transactions
may
take
place
in
centralised
exchanges
thatact
as
an
intermediary,
or
peer-to-peer
exchanges
that
only
match
offers
from
buyers
and
sellersbut
do
not
act
as
intermediaries.ECBWorkingPaperSeriesNo28682special
status
–
and
the
currencies
of
30
EMDEs.
Data
are
obtained
from
the
largestP2P
exchanges,
namely
LocalBitcoins
and
Paxful,
over
the
period
January
2018
-April
2022,
on
a
weekly
basis.Our
results,
overall,
reinforce
the
hypothesis,
currently
prevailing
in
the
literature,that
Bitcoin
trading
is
driven
by
speculative
motives.
In
this
paper,
we
show
thatthis
is
truly
a
global
phenomenon.
There
is
suggestive
evidence
of
a
global
cryptocycle
in
Bitcoin
trading
against
fiat
currencies,
with
transactions
across
currenciesand
users
around
the
world
moving
in
tandem
with
fluctuations
in
the
Bitcoin
price.Similarly
to
other
risky
assets,
momentum
in
the
crypto-asset
market,
past
Bitcoinprice
volatility
as
well
as
global
financial
market
volatility
do
matter
for
Bitcointrading
against
different
fiat
currencies.However,
Bitcoin
seems
to
offer
also
specific
transactional
benefits,
in
particularin
EMDEs.
The
depreciation
of
the
domestic
currency
of
EMDEs
–
notably
not
ofthe
currency
of
AEs
–
induces
more
Bitcoin
trading,
in
particular
after
the
COVID-19pandemic.
This
indeed
suggests
that
Bitcoin,
despite
its
wide
price
fluctuations,might
have
been
appreciated
also
as
a
store
of
value
or
medium
of
exchange
incountries
which
experienced
a
loss
in
the
the
purchasing
power
of
their
domesticcurrency.
In
turn,
this
implies
that
macroeconomic
instability
may
potentially
spurgreater
cryptoasset
usage.
This
result
is
important
for
the
asset
pricing
theory
ofcryptoassets,
suggesting
that
the
fundamental
value
of
Bitcoin
may
be
substantiallydifferent
between
AEs
and
EMDEs,
since
its
transactional
services
are
probably
moreelevated
in
less
developed
economies.
Moreover,
we
find
that
proxies
of
bankingdepth
and
digitalisation
are
negatively
correlated
with
the
extent
to
which
eachcurrency
loads
on
the
global
common
factor
in
Bitcoin
trading
volumes,
indicatingthat
crypto-assets
may
offer
a
speculative
alternative
to
traditional
finance
whenthis
is
not
available,
in
particular
in
EMDEs
where
the
share
of
younger
risk-pronepopulation
is
higher,
another
important
finding
of
our
analysis.Our
findings
clearly
point
to
potential
financial
stability
risks
in
EMDEs
withlow
levels
of
financial
development
and
unstable
fiat
currencies.
The
intrinsic
pricevolatility
of
Bitcoin
may
discourage
its
use
as
a
store
of
value
or
means
of
payment;however,
in
the
future,
other
crypto
assets,
such
as
stablecoins
that
pledge
to
ensurea
parity
to
the
US
dollar
or
other
reserve
currencies,
might
become
more
widely
usedby
individuals
and
firms
in
order
to
compensate
for
the
lack
of
financial
alternatives.ECBWorkingPaperSeriesNo286831
IntroductionTo
what
extent
is
Bitcoin
usage
a
global
phenomenon
driven
by
speculative
demand?To
what
extent
can
country-specific
factors
explain
the
use
of
Bitcoin?
What
drivesthe
adoption
of
an
unbacked
digital
currency
like
Bitcoin?
These
are
importantquestions
that
so
far
have
received
only
partial
answers,
largely
due
to
the
difficultyto
trace
who
owns
and
trades
cryptocurrencies.In
this
study,
we
overcome
the
obstacle
of
limited
country-by-country
informationon
cryptocurrency
use
by
looking
at
fiat
currency
transactions
against
Bitcoin.1Compared
to
previous
studies,
we
analyse
transactions
taking
place
in
peer-to-peer(P2P)
exchanges
that
perform
transactions
outside
the
blockchain
network
(i.e.
theyare
off-chain)
and
in
a
decentralised
manner
(see
Section
2).
These
P2P
exchangeshave
an
important
peculiarity:
they
target
mainly
small
retail
users.2
In
these
P2Pexchanges,
bid-ask
spreads
tend
to
be
large
so
that
these
exchanges
are
usually
notaffected
by
the
problem
of
market
manipulation,
such
as
wash
trading,
typical
ofcentralised
exchanges,
thus
making
the
transactions
we
analyse
more
reliable.3
Asshown
in
Figure
1,
the
growth
in
cryptocurrency
markets
in
recent
years
has
takenplace
particularly
through
off-chain
transactions
and
in
emerging
and
developingeconomies
(EMDEs),
especially
in
P2P
exchanges
(see
Section
2).Specifically,
we
analyse
trading
volumes
of
Bitcoin
versus
the
currencies
of
14advanced
economies
(AEs)
–
excluding
the
US
dollar
due
to
its
special
status
–
andthe
currencies
of
30
EMDEs.
Data
are
obtained
from
the
largest
P2P
exchanges,namely
LocalBitcoins
and
Paxful,
over
the
period
January
2018
-
April
2022,
ona
weekly
basis.
First,
we
study
the
impact
of
a
number
of
crypto-specific
drivers,global
drivers
and
local
drivers
on
Bitcoin
transactions
in
a
fixed
effect
dynamicpanel
model
in
order
to
understand
the
motivations
of
Bitcoin
trading.
In
particular,we
investigate
whether
Bitcoin
transactions
have
been
driven
by
(i)
trends
that
arespecific
to
the
crypto-market
and
may
be
ascribed
to
the
demand
factors
highlightedby
Biais
et
al.
(2023);
(ii)
trends
that
are
related
to
the
traditional
financial
system,such
as
developments
in
global
financial
markets
and
liquidity,
global
macroeconomic1The
implicit
assumption
is
that
those
trading
currencies
that
are
not
major
internationalcurrencies,
in
particular
currencies
of
emerging
and
developing
economies,
are
residents
of
thecountries
issuing
that
currency.
We
shall
support
this
assumption
for
those
transactions
where
dataabout
the
residence
of
the
traders
of
Bitcoin
are
available.2See
Chainanalysis
(2021),
page
10.
Graf
von
Luckner
et
al.
(2023)
calculate
that
the
averagetrade
size
in
one
of
the
P2P
platforms
we
study,
Paxful,
is
around
USD
150.3Wash
trading
is
the
problem
of
having
investors
simultaneously
selling
and
buying
the
samefinancial
assets
to
create
artificial
activity
in
the
marketplace,
which
is
known
to
distort
price,volume,
and
volatility,
and
reduce
investors’
confidence
and
participation
in
financial
markets.According
to
Cong
et
al.
(Forthcoming),
analysing
a
sample
of
unregulated
exchanges,
wash
tradingis
a
serious
problem,
with
the
reported
volumes
inflated
on
average
by
over
70%.ECBWorkingPaperSeriesNo28684Figure
1:
Bitcoin
price,
on-chain
and
off-chain
volumes.Source:
CoinMetrics
and
CoinMarketCap.conditions
or
geopolitical
events,
similarly
to
analyses
of
foreign
exchange
tradingvolumes
(Cespa
et
al.,
2022);
and,
finally,
(iii)
country-specific
variables
that
reflectthe
weakness
of
the
institutional
and
macroeconomic
framework,
which
may
influencethe
transactional
services
of
Bitcoin
and
its
fundamental
value.
Second,
as
the
panelanalysis
finds
that
there
is
a
large
share
of
variation
in
Bitcoin
transactions
that
iscommon
across
different
currencies,
we
use
a
static
factor
model
to
identify
commonfactors
in
Bitcoin
trading
against
different
fiat
currencies
and
analyse
their
features.Finally,
we
turn
our
attention
to
EMDEs,
including
in
our
analysis
a
large
numberof
economic
and
institutional
variables
that,
according
to
the
literature,
might
beassociated
with
Bitcoin
usage,
studying
which
country
features
correlate
with
thecurrency
loading
on
the
main
global
component
of
Bitcoin
trading.We
find
that
momentum
and
volatility
in
the
crypto-asset
market
as
well
as
globalfinancial
market
volatility
and
liquidity
do
matter
for
Bitcoin
trading
against
differentfiat
currencies.
However,
in
a
panel
setting,
a
global
component
of
Bitcoin
tradingstill
needs
to
be
identified,
since
our
crypto-assets
and
global
drivers
fail
to
capturethe
full
extent
of
co-movement
in
Bitcoin
trading
across
currencies
and
over
time.Indeed,
the
factor
analysis
identifies
a
single
global
factor
that
on
average
explainsup
to
around
40%
of
the
variance
of
Bitcoin
trading
across
different
currencies
in
theCOVID-19
period.
There
is
therefore
suggestive
evidence
of
a
global
crypto
cycle
inBitcoin
transactions,
echoing
the
findings
of
the
global
financial
cycle
literature
forECBWorkingPaperSeriesNo28685traditional
asset
markets
(Miranda-Agrippino
and
Rey,
2022).
This
global
factor,in
turn,
is
correlated
with
the
Bitcoin
price,
as
shown
in
Figure
2.
Trading
acrosscurrencies
and
users
around
the
world
moves
in
tandem
with
fluctuations
in
theBitcoin
price,
suggesting
that
Bitcoin
is
largely
used
as
a
speculative
investmentasset
across
advanced,
emerging
and
developing
economies.Figure
2:
A
global
factor
in
Bitcoin
trading
volumes
against
fiat
currencies
iscorrelated
with
the
Bitcoin
priceThe
figure
shows
the
first
factor
extracted
from
the
trading
volume
of
Bitcoin
transactions
againstfiat
currencies
(blue
line)
and
the
change
in
the
Bitcoin
price
(yellow
line).
See
section
4.2
forfurther
details.
Trading
volumes
and
the
Bitcoin
price
are
detrended
with
the
log
difference
withrespect
to
the
past
15-week
moving
average.However,
Bitcoin
seems
to
offer
also
transactional
benefits,
in
particular
inEMDEs.
The
trading
of
Bitcoin
against
fiat
currencies
of
EMDEs
is
somewhatdifferent
from
that
against
currencies
of
AEs.
The
impact
of
momentum
in
thecrypto-asset
market
is
particularly
strong
in
EMDEs
in
the
period
of
the
COVID-19pandemic.
Importantly,
one
local
driver,
the
depreciation
of
the
domestic
currencyversus
the
US
dollar,
plays
a
role
in
encouraging
more
Bitcoin
trading
against
thecurrencies
of
EMDEs,
again
in
particular
since
the
start
of
the
COVID-19
pandemic.This
finding
suggests
that
Bitcoin
might
be
used
as
a
store
of
value
or
mediumof
exchange
in
countries
which
experience
a
loss
in
the
purchasing
power
of
theirdomestic
currency.
Finally,
the
extent
to
which
each
currency
of
EMDEs
loads
onthe
global
factor
–
the
factor
more
closely
associated
with
the
Bitcoin
price
–
isnegatively
correlated
with
the
number
of
ATMs
or
the
diffusion
of
digital
paymentsECBWorkingPaperSeriesNo28686in
the
countries
issuing
the
respective
currency
and
positively
with
a
higher
share
ofyounger
population.
Possibly,
the
lack
of
a
developed
financial
system,
providingefficient
payment
rails
and
the
ability
to
diversify
the
financial
portfolio,
encouragesthe
youngest
cohorts
of
the
population
in
EMDEs
to
take
the
risk
of
a
cryptoassetinvestment.Our
results
point
towards
financial
stability
risks
associated
with
cryptocurrencyspeculation.
This
is
exacerbated
by
the
limited
consumer
protection
and
high
levelof
opaqueness
in
cryptomarkets,
as
suggested
by
evidence
on
price
manipulationand
insider
trading
(Gandal
et
al.,
2018;
Griffin
and
Shams,
2020).
Moreover,
therather
high
price
volatility
of
the
cryptoasset
markets
has
been
punctuated
by
marketcrashes,
while
the
link
with
the
mainstream
financial
system
has
been
increasing.4Notably,
our
results
indicate
that
financial
stability
risks
could
be
more
pronouncedin
EMDEs
with
low
levels
of
financial
development
and
unstable
fiat
currencies.
Inthese
countries,
Bitcoin
–
or,
more
likely,
other
crypto-assets
like
stablecoins
in
thefuture
-
might
become
widely
used
by
individuals
and
firms
for
ordinary
transactionsor
as
a
store
of
value,
in
order
to
compensate
for
the
lack
of
financial
alternatives.5These
developments
raise
the
risk
of
cryptoisation
(IMF,
2021)
–
i.e.
the
substitutionof
the
domestic
currency
with
a
cryptocurrency
in
the
similar
fashion
as
the
USdollar
is
widely
used
in
countries
with
high
inflation
–
and
represent
a
threat
tothe
implementation
of
capital
flow
management
policies
in
these
countries
(He
etal.,
2022).
To
a
large
extent,
our
results
and
policy
implications
concern
EMDEs,as
decentralised
P2P
exchanges
found
fertile
ground
in
less
developed
economies,whereas
residents
of
AEs
tend
to
use
off-chain
centralised
exchanges,
which
arebeyond
the
scope
of
this
study.
However,
financial
stability
risks
stemming
fromcryptocurrencies,
in
general,
are
not
confined
to
EMDEs,
as
US-based
evidencepoints
towards
substantial
spillover
effects
from
cryptocurrencies
on
the
real
economythrough
consumption
and
investment
into
other
asset
classes
(Aiello
et
al.,
2023).Our
study
contributes
to
a
growing
literature
on
the
drivers
of
Bitcoin
and
othercrypto
assets
usage.
Bitcoin
was
created
with
the
aim
of
providing
an
alternativepayment
system
that
would
operate
in
a
decentralised
way,
free
of
the
control
ofa
third
party
or
an
authority.
Notably,
like
many
other
crypto-assets,
Bitcoin
isnot
backed
by
any
real
asset
or
any
governmental
claims
(Halaburda
et
al.,
2022).64For
instance,
the
crash
of
the
algorithmic
stablecoin
TerraUSD
in
May
2022,
analysed
in
Uhlig(2022).
Iyer
(2022)
provide
evidence
on
the
increased
interconnection
between
cryptoasset
andequity
markets
across
economies
over
time,
while
Karau
(2023)
shows
that
Bitcoin
prices
respondto
monetary
policy
shocks
similarly
to
stock
prices
since
the
COVID-19
pandemic.5Stablecoins
are
digital
assets
designed
to
minimise
price
volatility
typically
against
a
single
fiatcurrency
like
the
US
dollar
(or
a
basket
of
fiat
currencies
or
reserve
assets).6According
to
the
definition
of
the
Financial
Stability
Board,
crypto-assets
like
Bitcoin
are
atype
of
private
sector
digital
asset
that
depend
primarily
on
cryptography
and
distributed
ledger
orECBWorkingPaperSeriesNo28687Considering
the
apparent
lack
of
a
fundamental
value,
the
exponential
growth
inthe
volume
of
transactions
involving
Bitcoin
and
in
its
price
is
certainly
surprising(see
Figure
1).
This
in
turn
has
generated
a
lively
and
fast-growing
debate
amongeconomists
about
the
motivations
behind
the
use
of
Bitcoin.
After
an
initial
usageby
a
small
community
of
experts,
the
usage
of
Bitcoin
has
been
subsequently
drivenby
the
black
market
of
illegal
goods
and
services
and
by
gambling
(Foley
et
al.,
2019;Marmora,
2021).
More
recently,
however,
the
soaring
popularity
of
cryptocurrencyexchange
markets
and
Bitcoin
might
have
also
been
driven
by
speculative
motives(Baur
et
al.,
2018)
or,
possibly,
by
its
potential
use
for
cross-border
transactions
andtransfers
(Graf
von
Luckner
et
al.,
2023;
Makarov
and
Schoar,
2021),
although
thehigh
volatility
of
its
price
makes
Bitcoin
impractical
as
a
medium
of
exchange
(Baurand
Dimpfl,
2021).7The
popularity
of
Bitcoin
and
other
cryptocurrencies
has
not
been
confined
tofew
economies,
but
it
has
morphed
into
a
global
phenomenon,
rapidly
spreadingto
economies
with
disparate
levels
of
economic
development
and
financial
literacy.Notably,
EMDEs
are
at
the
forefront
of
crypto
adoption.
According
to
Chainanalysis(2022),
among
the
top
20
countries
with
the
highest
crypto
adoption
index,
thereare
only
two
AEs,
the
United
States
and
United
Kingdom,
whereas
the
remainingcountries
are
all
EMDEs
from
Asia,
Africa,
Europe
or
Latin
America.8There
a
number
of
potential
reasons
behind
the
growing
popularity
of
Bitcoin
andother
cryptocurrencies
in
EMDEs.
First,
cryptocurrencies
may
be
used
as
speculativeassets,
which
may
be
particular
attractive
to
investors
from
countries
where
theportfolio
choice
of
investment
assets
is
restricted
by
regulatory
or
institutionalfeatures.
Second,
even
though
prices
have
been
very
volatile,
these
cryptocurrenciesmay
represent
a
better
store
of
value
or
medium
of
exchange
with
respect
to
thedomestic
currency
in
countries
where
inflation
is
high
and
the
exchange
rate
tendssimilar
technology
(see
/work-of-the-fsb/financial-innovation-and-structural-change/crypto-assets-and-global-stablecoins/).
Crypto-assets
transactions
that
are
recorded
ona
distributed
ledger
-
the
blockchain
-
are
public
and
rely
on
consensus
mechanisms
instead
oftrusted
parties.
The
transactions
are
not
tied
to
real-world
entities
but
rather
crypto-addresses
(i.e.account
numbers)
whose
owners
are
not
explicitly
identified,
thereby
ensuring
(pseudo)
anonymity.7Leveraging
on
a
recent
US
survey
of
consumers,
Auer
and
Tercero-Lucas
(2022)
show
thatcryptocurrency
investors
tend
to
be
highly
educated,
young,
male
and
digital
natives,
and
thatdistrust
in
regular
finance
is
not
the
key
driver
of
investment
in
cryptocurrencies.
Using
data
froma
German
online
bank,
Hackethal
et
al.
(2021)
find
that
cryptocurrency
investors
are
active
traderswho
are
prone
to
investment
biases
and
hold
risky
portfolios,
tilting
their
portfolios
toward
evenmore
risky
securities
after
cryptocurrency
usage.
Weber
et
al.
(2023)
also
rely
on
survey
data
onUS
households
to
report
that
cryptocurrency
holders
tend
to
be
young,
white,
male
and
morelibertarian
relative
to
non-crypto
holders.8In
September
2021,
Bitcoin
was
even
adopted
as
legal
tender
in
El
Salvador
and
Central
AfricanRepublic.
However,
Alvarez
et
al.
(2022)
find
that
the
use
of
Bitcoin
for
everyday
transactions
inEl
Salvador
was
low,
based
on
a
national
survey
conducted
soon
after
the
adoption
of
Bitcoin
aslegal
tender.ECBWorkingPaperSeriesNo28688to
depreciate.
Third,
residents
from
EMDEs
may
use
c
温馨提示
- 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
- 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
- 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
- 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
- 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
- 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。
最新文档
- 交通事故赔偿金协议书七篇
- 鲍恩病病因介绍
- 劳务派遣书面协议书七篇
- 《数据资产入表合规规范指南》(征求意见稿)
- (参考)雕刻工艺品投资项目可行性研究报告
- 2023年天津市南开区高考语文二模试卷
- 《廉政公署专题》课件
- 电工培训课件之跌落熔丝的操作
- 《广告创意文案设计》课件
- 内蒙古呼伦贝尔市阿荣旗2023-2024学年七年级上学期期末考试数学试卷(含答案)
- 二零二四年物流园区建设合作协议
- 医疗机构舆情应急处置预案
- 中国计量大学《数据科学导论》2022-2023学年第一学期期末试卷
- 第六单元《平移、旋转和轴对称》-2024-2025学年三年级数学上册单元测试卷(苏教版)
- .NET开发工程师招聘面试题及回答建议(某世界500强集团)2024年
- OECD -二十国集团 经合组织公司治理原则2023
- 2024年广东省深圳市33校联考中考英语一模试卷
- 新版标准日本语.中级单词
- 污水处理设备供货安装技术服务方案
- 2024至2030年中国炔草酯数据监测研究报告
- 预防性侵安全教育主题课件
评论
0/150
提交评论