nber -The Summer Drop in Female Employment-此为英文文档_第1页
nber -The Summer Drop in Female Employment-此为英文文档_第2页
nber -The Summer Drop in Female Employment-此为英文文档_第3页
nber -The Summer Drop in Female Employment-此为英文文档_第4页
nber -The Summer Drop in Female Employment-此为英文文档_第5页
已阅读5页,还剩125页未读 继续免费阅读

下载本文档

版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领

文档简介

NBERWORKINGPAPERSERIES

THESUMMERDROPINFEMALEEMPLOYMENT

BrendanM.Price

MelanieWasserman

WorkingPaper31566

/papers/w31566

NATIONALBUREAUOFECONOMICRESEARCH

1050MassachusettsAvenue

Cambridge,MA02138

August2023

PricegratefullyacknowledgesfinancialsupportfromtheW.E.UpjohnInstitute’sEarlyCareerResearchAwardprogram.WearegratefultoMonicaRodriguez-GuevaraandMatiasGiaccobassoforoutstandingresearchassistance.WethankMarthaBailey,JohnCoglianese,AndrewGarin,PaolaGiuliano,ClaudiaGoldin,AngelaKilby,ColleenFlahertyManchester,SethMurray,ChristopherNekarda,RomainWacziarg,andparticipantsatthe2021LaborandEmploymentRelationsAssociationmeetings,theFederalReserveBoard,theUniversityofMichiganPopulationStudiesCenter,theUniversityofIllinoisatUrbana-Champaign,theUniversityofChicagoInclusiveEconomyLab,theUpjohnInstitute,theFederalReserveBankofSanFrancisco,UCBerkeley,UCDavis,UCMerced,ClaremontMcKennaCollege,theCEPR-QMULAnnualSymposiuminLabourEconomics,the2023MontanaStateUniversityAppliedEconomicsConference,the2023NorthAmericaSummerMeetingoftheEconometricsSociety,the2022WebinarinGenderandFamilyEconomics,the2022SocietyofLaborEconomistsannualmeeting,the2022CESifoAreaConferenceonLaborEconomics,andthe2022SITEGenderconferenceforhelpfulfeedback.Allerrorsareours.TheviewsexpressedinthispaperarethoseoftheauthorsanddonotnecessarilyrepresenttheviewsorpoliciesoftheBoardofGovernorsoftheFederalReserveSystem,itsstaff,ortheNationalBureauofEconomicResearch.

NBERworkingpapersarecirculatedfordiscussionandcommentpurposes.Theyhavenotbeenpeer-reviewedorbeensubjecttothereviewbytheNBERBoardofDirectorsthataccompaniesofficialNBERpublications.

©2023byBrendanM.PriceandMelanieWasserman.Allrightsreserved.Shortsectionsoftext,nottoexceedtwoparagraphs,maybequotedwithoutexplicitpermissionprovidedthatfullcredit,including©notice,isgiventothesource.

TheSummerDropinFemaleEmployment

BrendanM.PriceandMelanieWasserman

NBERWorkingPaperNo.31566

August2023

JELNo.J13,J16,J22,J24

ABSTRACT

Weprovidethefirstsystematicaccountofsummerdeclinesinwomen’slabormarketactivity.FromMaytoJuly,theemployment-to-populationratioamongprime-ageUSwomendeclinesby1.1percentagepoints,whereasmaleemploymentrises;women’stotalhoursworkedfallby9.8percent,morethantwicethedeclineamongmen.Schoolclosuresforsummerbreak—andcorrespondinglapsesinimplicitchildcare—provideaunifyingexplanationforthesepatterns.Thesummerdropinfemaleemploymentalignswithcross-statedifferencesinthetimingofschoolclosures,isconcentratedamongmotherswithyoungschool-agechildren,andcoincideswithincreasedtimespentengaginginchildcare.Decomposingthegendergapinsummerworkinterruptionsacrossjobtypesdefinedbysectorandoccupation,wefindlargecontributionsfrombothgenderdifferencesinjoballocationandgenderdifferenceswithinjobtypesinthepropensitytoexitemploymentoverthesummer.Women’ssummerworkinterruptionscontributetogendergapsinpay:women’sweeklyearningsdeclineby3.3percentoverthesummermonths,aboutfivetimesthedeclineamongmen.

BrendanM.Price

FederalReserveBoard

20thStreetandConstitutionAveNW

Washington,DC20551

brendan.m.price@

MelanieWasserman

UCLAAndersonSchoolofManagement

110WestwoodPlazaC521

LosAngeles,CA90095

andNBER

melanie.wasserman@

2

Percentagepoints(Dec.2019=0)

1Introduction

Womenandmendiffermarkedlyintheintensityandtimingoftheirwork.Relativetomen,womenworkfewerhoursperweek,havemoreconventionalworkschedules,worklessovertime,andexperiencemorecareerinterruptions

.1

Thesedifferencesinlaborsupplyalongtheextensiveandintensivemarginscanexplainaconsiderableportionofgendergapsinwagesandearnings

(Goldin,

2014;

BlauandKahn,

2017

).Butdespitedecadesofresearchintogenderdisparitiesinlaborsupply,surprisinglylittleisknownaboutgendergapsinthetimingofworkthroughouttheyear.Asastartingpoint,

Figure1

plotsnon–seasonallyadjustedlaborforceparticipationratesforwomenandmen,withJune,July,andAugustshadedgray.Astrikingseasonalpatternemerges:summeraftersummer,women’slaborforceparticipationdropssharply,whereasmen’sparticipation

remainscomparativelystable.

Thispaperprovidesthefirstsystematicaccountofsummerdeclinesinfemaleemployment.UsingCurrentPopulationSurveydataspanning1989–2019,wefirstshowthattheemployment-

to-populationratioamongprime-ageUSwomenfallsbyanaverageof1.1percentagepointsbe-

Figure1:Thesummerdropinprime-agefemalelaborforceparticipation

1

0

-1

-2

-3

-4

-5

2013201420152016201720182019

WomenMen

Source:BureauofLaborStatistics,LaborForceStatistics,seriesLNU01300061(men)andLNU01300062(women).

Notes:Non–seasonallyadjustedlaborforceparticipationratesamongindividualsages25–54,normalizedtozeroinDecember2019.ShadedregionscorrespondtothemonthsofJune,July,andAugust.

1See,

andPan

forexample,

Bertrand,Goldin,andKatz

(2010

);

MasandPallais

(2017

);

WiswallandZafar

(2018

);

Cort´es

(2019

);

BolotnyyandEmanuel

(2022

);

Cubas,Juhn,andSilos

(2022

);and

Wasserman

(2023

).

3

tweenMayandJuly(equivalentto1.5percentofitsMaylevel),withequalcontributionsfromincreasedunemploymentanddiminishedparticipation.Thisyearlydeclineiseconomicallymean-ingful,amountingtoalmostonethirdofthedeclineintheprime-agefemaleemploymentrateduringtheGreatRecession.Incontrast,employmentamongprime-agemenedgesupslightlythroughoutsummer.Declinesinfemaleworkactivityalongtheintensivemarginreinforcethosealongtheextensivemargin:conditionalonbeingemployed,bothwomenandmenworkfewerhoursinthesummermonths(primarilyreflectingsummervacations),butforwomenthedropislargerandin-cludesasizableincreaseinunpaidtimeoff.Combiningbothmargins,women’stotalhoursworked

contractby9.8percentfromMaytoJuly,morethantwicethedeclineamongmen.

Schoolclosuresforsummerbreak—andcorrespondinglapsesinimplicitchildcare—provideaunifyingexplanationforthesepatterns.Duringthesummer,parentsuseapatchworkofchildcarearrangements,rangingfromsummerschoolandcampstoinformalcarebyrelatives,toaccountforthesixhoursperweekdaythatchildrenpreviouslyspentinschool.Becausewomenshoulderadisproportionateshareofchildcare—asevidencedbyobservedpatternsofparentaltimeuseaswellasgenderdifferencesinsingleparenthood—theirlaborsupplyislikelytobemoreheavilyinfluencedbyseasonalreductionsinaccesstoexternalchildcare.Inaddition,preferencesforcomplementary

leisuremayleadwomentoreduceemploymentwhiletheirchildrenareonsummerbreak.

Toestablishthecentralroleofschoolclosures,weshowthatthesummerdropinfemaleem-ployment(1)istightlysynchronizedwithcross-statedifferencesinthetimingofschools’summerbreaks;(2)isconcentratedamongmothers,especiallythosewithchildrenoldenoughtoattendschoolbutyoungenoughtorequiresupervisionwhennotinschool;(3)isdrivenbyanincreaseinnon-participantswhocitehouseholdorfamilydutiesastheirmainactivitywhileoutofthelaborforce;and(4)coincideswithanincreaseinwomen’stimespentengaginginchildcare.Theseregu-laritiesareabsentormuchlessevidentamongmen.Wealsoprovideevidencethatcomplementary

leisurecanexplainatmosthalfofthesummerdropinfemaleemployment.

Thegendergapinsummeremploymentisdriveninequalpartsbygenderdifferencesinsortingacrosssectors/occupationsandbygenderdifferencesconditionalonjobtype.Thesortingtakestwoforms.First,womenaredisproportionatelyrepresentedineducationalservices,whereemploymentplummetseachsummer.Second,evenwithineducation,womenaremorelikelyto

workinoccupationsthatcontractmoresharplyoverthesummer.Althoughwomenmaychoose

4

toworkintheeducationsectorformanyreasons,workingmothersmayfindjobsinthatsectorespeciallyattractivebecausetheirworkschedulesarealignedwithschoolcalendars.Indeed,weshowthatwomen’spropensitytoworkineducationpeakspreciselywhentheirchildrenareofschool-goingage.Alongsidethesesortingeffects,womeninagivensector/occupationalsoexitemploymenteachsummeratrateshigherthantheirmalecounterparts.Withineducation,femaleteachers,managers,andbusdriversallworklessoverthesummerthanmeninthesameoccupation.

Outsideeducation,too,womenexitemploymenteachsummerathigherratesthanmen.

Schoolclosuresforsummerbreakmaycontributetogendergapsinpaybyreducingwomen’sannualhoursworked,curbingproductivity,impedinghumancapitalaccumulation,orinfluencingjobchoices.Weprovideevidencefortwosuchchannels.First,weestimatethatthesummerdropinwomen’semploymentandhoursleadstoacontemporaneousearningslossof3.3percent,aboutfivetimesthedeclineexperiencedbymen.Second,amongoccupationsrepresentedinboththeeducationandnon-educationsectors,weshowthatwomensystematicallysortintoeducationjobs.Sincejobsineducationtypicallypaylessthancomparablejobsoutsideofeducation,womenmay

betradingoffcompensationforaccesstosummerflexibility.

Thispapercontributestothevoluminousliteraturethatstudiesgenderdisparitiesinlabormarketactivityalongboththeextensiveandintensivemargins.Women’sdifferentialdemandfortemporalflexibilityinworkschedulesisoneoftheleadingexplanationsfortheremaininggender

gapsinpay(Goldin,

2014;

WiswallandZafar,

2018;

Cort´esandPan,

2019;

Cubas,Juhn,andSilos,

2022;

Adams-Prassletal.,

2023;

Wasserman,

2023

).Temporaldemandsaretypicallydefinedasthenumberandtimingofhoursworkedperdayorweek,thepredictabilityandlocationofthosehours,andtheextenttowhichtheemployer(versustheemployee)hasdiscretionoverthosehours

(MasandPallais,

2017;

BlauandWinkler,

2018;

WiswallandZafar,

2018

).Ourpaperestablishesanewdimensionoftemporalflexibility—thetimingofworkthroughouttheyear—andshowsthatchildcareconsiderationspromptwomenbothtogravitatetojobsthatprovidesummerflexibility

andtoreducetheirsummeremploymentwithinagivenjob.

Acloselyrelatedliteraturestudiesthelabormarketramificationsofschoolavailabilityandtiming.Expansionsintheavailabilityofschoolinggenerallyhavepositiveeffectsonmothers’labor

supply(Gelbach,

2002;

Cascio,

2009;

Fitzpatrick,

2012).

Withregardtothetimingofschooling,

DuchiniandVanEffenterre

(2022)findgainsinthecontinuityofmaternalemploymentwhen

5

France’sschoolweekswitchedfromhavingWednesdaysofftorunningMondaythroughFriday.Inasimilarvein,

Graves

(2013)documentsthatyear-roundschoolschedules—whichchopupthe

schoolyearintosmallerintervalsofschooling—havenegativeeffectsonmaternalemployment.Weshowhowapervasivefeatureofeducationalsystems—summerbreak—shapesthetimingofwomen’s

workthroughouttheyear.

OurpaperalsocomplementstheliteratureonthegenderedlabormarketeffectsoftheCOVID-19pandemic

.2

Despiteclearparallels,theschoolclosuresthatoccureachsummerdif-ferinimportantrespectsfromthosecausedbythepandemic.Whilepandemicschoolclosureswereunanticipated,summerschoolclosuresarepredictableeventstowhichcareerchoiceshaveampletimetorespond.Inaddition,whereaspandemicschoolclosureswereunprecedentedevents,school

closuresduetoannualsummerbreaksarealongstandingfixtureoftheUSeducationalsystem.

Wealsocontributetoabodyofresearchanalyzingseasonalregularitiesbothinthemacroe-conomy(

BarskyandMiron,

1989;

MironandBeaulieu,

1996;

OliveiandTenreyro,

2007;

Ngai

andTenreyro,

2014;

GeremewandGourio,

2018)andamongindividualworkersandhouseholds

(Moretti,

2000;

DelBonoandWeber,

2008;

CoglianeseandPrice,

2020)

.Arecurringthemeinthesepapersisthatseasonalphenomena—thoughroutinelyregardedasstatisticalnuisancestobeadjustedaway—canhaveimportantreal-worldconsequencesthatgounnoticedinadjustedoran-nualizeddata.Soundingthesametheme,wedemonstratehowseasonallapsesinpubliclyprovided

implicitchildcareshapethetimingandcontinuityofwomen’slabormarketactivity.

Section2

describesoursampleandregressionspecifications.

Section3

documentssummerdeclinesinfemaleemploymentandhours.

Section4

developsamodeloflife-cyclelaborsupplywithschoolclosuresforsummerbreak.

Section5

providesevidencethattheseschoolclosuresareindeedcentraltothesummerdropinfemaleemployment.

Section6

decomposesthegendergapinsummerworkinterruptionsbetweenandwithinjobtypes.

Section7

showsimpactsongender

gapsinpay.

Section8

concludes.

2See,amongothers,

Heggeness

(2020);

AlbanesiandKim

(2021);

Alonetal.

(2021);

Furman,Kearney,andPowell

(2021

);

Montes,Smith,andLeigh

(2021

);

Amuedo-Dorantesetal.

(2022

);

Couch,Fairlie,andXu

(2022

);

Garciaand

Cowan

(2022

);

Goldin

(2022

);

Hansen,Sabia,andSchaller

(2022

);

Montenovoetal.

(2022

);and

RussellandSun

(2020

).

6

2DataandMethodology

WetraceseasonalshiftsinlabormarketactivityusingtheCurrentPopulationSurvey(CPS),withauxiliaryanalysisdrawingontheAmericanTimeUseSurvey(ATUS).WedescribetheCPShere,

withfurtherdetailsin

AppendixB.1

.WedeferdiscussionoftheATUSuntillaterinthepaper.

2.1Sampleconstruction

TheCPSisarepresentativesurveyofUShouseholdsconductedmonthlybytheUSCensusBureauonbehalfoftheBureauofLaborStatistics.FrombasicCPSextractsprovidedbytheIntegratedPublicUseMicrodataSeries(IPUMS,

Floodetal.,

2021

),weassembleapersonxyear-monthpanelofcivilianindividualsages25–49spanningtheyears1989–2019.Wefocusonprime-ageadultstoabstractfromseasonalityinlaborsupplylinkedtoanindividual’sownschoolenrollmentandretirementdecisions;werestricttociviliansbecausekeylabormarketquestionsarenotaskedofmembersofthearmedforces.Ouranalysisperiodbeginsin1989,whentheCPSfirstreportsactualhoursworked—allowingustoexaminetheintensiveaswellastheextensivemarginoflaborinput—andendsontheeveoftheCOVID-19pandemic,whichupendedtypicalseasonalpatterns.

AppendixTableA.1

reportssummarystatisticsforourCPSsample.

CPShouseholdsarein-sampleforfourconsecutivemonths,out-of-sampleforeightmonths,andthenbackin-sampleforafinalfourmonths.Weusethecross-sectionaldimensionoftheCPStotraceseasonalityinlabormarketstocks,andweusethelongitudinaldimensiontotracklabormarketflowsbothmonth-to-monthandinback-to-backyears(

RiveraDrew,Flood,andWarren,

2014

).Forcross-sectionalanalyses,weuseIPUMSsamplingweightstoensurethatourestimatesarerepresentativeoftheprime-ageUSpopulation.Forlongitudinalanalyses,weuseiterativeproportionalfittingtoconstructsex-specificrakedsamplingweightsthatensureconsistencybe-tweenlabormarketstocksandflowsthroughoutouranalysisperiod(

Frazisetal.,

2005

).Following

MadrianandLefgren

(2000),wevalidatecross-periodindividuallinkagesonthebasisofsex,age,

andrace,andweexcludeprobablemismatchesfromourlongitudinalanalyses.

Weobservehouseholdcharacteristicsandlabormarketactivityasofthesurveyreferenceweek,whichusuallystraddlesthe12thdayofthemonth(andisthesameforallrespondentsina

givenyear-month).Wepartitionindividualsintothoseemployed,thoseunemployed,andthosenot

7

participatinginthelaborforce.Toaccountforvacation/leave-takingduringthesummermonths,weseparatelyanalyzewhetherindividualsareemployedandatworkoremployedbutabsentfromwork.Sinceemploymentcontractsintheeducationsectorcanspan9or12months,trackingwhetherornotindividualsareemployedandatworkalsosidestepsthesubtletiesofhowschoolstaffreportspellsofnon-workduringthesummermonths.WealsoleverageCPSdataonindustry,occupation,earnings,andactualhoursworkedduringthereferenceweek;statedreasonforabsenceaswellaspaidvs.unpaidleaveforthoseabsentfromwork;andreasonsfornon-participationor

unemploymentamongthosenotemployed.

Wecodeindividualsas“married”iftheirspouseispresent,absent,orseparated;wecodesingle,divorced,andwidowedindividualsas“unmarried”.Wedefineparentalstatusbasedonthepresenceorabsenceinthehouseholdofoneormoreownchildrenunderage18.Thisdefinitionencompassesadoptedchildrenandstep-childrenaswellasbiologicalchildren,butitexcludesotherchildrenresidinginthehousehold(suchasniecesandnephews)aswellasbiologicalchildrenwho

havealreadymovedout.

2.2Mainspecifications

Weemploysimpleregressionspecificationsthatrecoverthetypicalseasonalmovementsinagiventimeseries.Becausethevariationofinterestiscross-month,weaggregateourdatatotheyear-monthlevelforeachpopulationweconsider.Totraceseasonalshiftsinlabormarketactivity

withinagivenpopulation,wethenestimatetime-seriesspecificationsoftheform

yt=α+Lβm.✶{M(t)=m}+f(t)+γ.weekst+εt(1)

m5

whereytisanoutcomeinyear-montht,M(t)e{1,2,...,12}returnsthecalendarmonthforperiodt,f(t)controlsforlower-frequencytrends,andweekstisthenumberofweekselapsedsincethepreviousmonth’sreferenceweek.

3

Becauseourfocusisonsummerworkinterruptions,

wenormalizeβ5tozero,sothatthecoefficientsofinterestβmcaptureaveragedifferencesinan

3TheCPSreferenceweekissometimesshiftedtoaccommodatemajorholidays.Althoughweekstvariesacrossyearsforagivencalendarmonth(sothatγcanbeidentified),ittendstobelargerorsmallerinparticularmonthsduetotheholidayadjustment.Ourestimateswouldbemodestlybiasedwithoutthiscontrolvariable—particularlywhenweturntolabormarketflows—becauselongergapsbetweenreferenceweeksgivemoretimeforflowstooccur.

8

outcomerelativetothemonthofMay.

Toaccountflexiblybutparsimoniouslyforseculartrendsandbusiness-cycledynamicsthatmightotherwisebiasestimationofseasonalpatterns,wespecifyf(t)asalinearsplineincalendartime,withknotsatroughlyfive-yearintervalscorrespondingtoturningpointsintheprime-ageemploymentandparticipationrates.

AppendixB.2

detailsourknot-selectionprocedure,whichweadaptfromthealgorithmusedby

Dupraz,Nakamura,andSteinsson

(2019)tolocateturningpoints

intheunemploymentrate.Oursplinefunctionflexiblycaptureslow-frequencydynamicsinourcoreoutcomesofinterestand,moregenerally,allowsfornon-parametrictimetrendsinallofourspecifications.Weadditionallycontrolforthenumberofweekselapsedbetweensuccessivemonths’referenceweeks,sincethesetimeintervalsarecorrelatedwithmonthlengthandholidaytiming.Weestimate

Equation(1)

separatelyforeachofthedemographicgroupsweconsider,sincetrendandcyclicalmovementsinlabormarketoutcomesvarystronglywithsexandhouseholdstructure

(JuhnandPotter,

2006;

AlbanesiandS¸ahin,

2018;

Bard´oczy,

2022)

.

Equation(1)

isdesignedforusewithstockvariables,suchasemploymentrates.When

examininglabormarketflows,weestimatethefirst-differencedanalogueof

Equation(1):

∆yt=δm.✶{M(t)=m}+∆f(t)+θ.∆weekst+∆εt(2)

where∆ytrepresentsgrossinflows,grossoutflows,ornetflowsintoemploymentasashareoftherelevantpopulation.Inthisformulation,thecoefficientsofinterestδmcapturethemagnitudeofflowsbetweenmonthsm_1andmrelativetoApril–Mayflows,andthedifferencedsplineterms

morphintoindicatorvariablesthatallowforstructuralbreaksinflowratesattheknotdates.

Inbothstockandflowspecifications,weallowforheteroskedasticandautocorrelation-consistentstandarderrors(

NeweyandWest,

1987)correlateduptoamaximumlagof26months,a

horizonsuggestedbytheautomaticlagselectorof

NeweyandWest

(1994).4

Whenourinterestlies

thoefficients(ratherthanmanddirectly),weconstructconfidence

4Tochooseanappropriatelagstructure,weranourmainspecificationseparatelybysexandbysex×householdstructureforseveralkeyoutcomevariables(employment,participation,hoursworked,andgrossemploymentflows).Acrossthesespecifications,theoptimalbandwidthoftenequaled(andneverexceeded)27months,correspondingtoamaximallagof26months.Forconsistencyandsimplicity,weimposethissamebandwidththroughoutthepaper.

9

DifferencerelativetoMay(p.p.)

3SummerDeclinesinFemaleEmploymentandHours

Thissectionestablishesthatwomen’slabormarketactivitycontractseachsummer—alongboth

extensiveandintensivemargins—inwaysmuchlessevidentamongmen.

3.1Women’semploymentdropsinthesummer

e—hee

tcnooenffic-piofrno—mgbiaf

measureexpressedasapercentageofthecorrespondingpopulation.Asshownintheleftpanel,theprime-agefemaleemployment-to-populationratio(EPOP)declinesby1.1percentagepoints(p.p.)betweenMayandJuly—amountingto1.5percentofitsMaylevel—andthenreboundsstronglyinthefall.Unemploymentandnon-participationcontributeequallytothesummerreductioninemployment,witheachrising55basispointsfromMaytoJuly.Incontrast,prime-agemale

employmentactuallyrisesslightlyoverthesummermonths.

Thesummerdeclineinfemaleemploymentissizable,equalingalmostonethirdofthedecline

inprime-agefemaleEPOPinthewakeoftheGreatRecession.5

Asshownin

AppendixFigureA.1,

Figure2:Seasonalshiftsinpercapitaemployment,unemployment,andnon-participation

Women

1.5

1.0

0.5

0.0

-0.5

-1.0

-1.5

MayJulySept.Nov.Jan.Mar.May

JuneAug.Oct.Dec.Feb.Apr.

Men

1.5

1.0

0.5

0.0

-0.5

-1.0

-1.5

MayJulySept.Nov.Jan.Mar.May

JuneAug.Oct.Dec.Feb.Apr.

EmploymentNon-participationUnemployment

Source:CurrentPopulationSurvey.

Notes:Coefficients)fromestimating

Equation(1)

,separatelybysex,forrespondentsages25–49groupedtotheyear-monthlevel.Eachmeasureisexpressedasashareofthecorrespondingpopulation.Barsshow95percentconfidenceintervalsbasedonNewey-Weststandarderrors.Inthisandmanysubsequentfigures,coefficientsforMayarenormalizedtozero,andplottedpointsareoffsethorizontallyforvisualclarity.

5Prime-agefemaleEPOPfell3.7percentagepointsfromthestartoftheGreatRecessioninDecember2007

10

DifferencerelativetoMay(p.p.)

Apr.→May

May→June

June→July

July→Aug.

Aug.→Sept.

Sept.→Oct.

Oct.→Nov.

Nov.→Dec.

Dec.→Jan.

Jan.→Feb.

Feb.→Mar.

Mar.→Apr.

Apr.→May

May→June

June→July

July→Aug.

Aug.→Sept.

Sept.→Oct.

Oct.→Nov.

Nov.→Dec.

Dec.→Jan.

Jan.→Feb.

Feb.→Mar.

Mar.→Apr.

thesummerdropalsoappearsrelativelystableovertime,withnoobvioustrendorcyclicalvari-ationinitsmagnitude.Inaddition,

AppendixFigureA.2

showsthatthefemaledropinsummer

employmentappearsconsistentlyacrossage,education,andracialandethnicgroups.

Employmentalsocontractssharplywiththeonsetofwinter,especiallyformen.Becausethemaindriversofwinterworkinterruptions—adverseweather,whichtriggerslayoffsinmale-dominatedsectorslikeconstruction,andapost-holidayretreatinconsumerspending—arenotoperativeinthesummermonths,weconfineouranalysistosummerworkinterruptions,thoughwe

continuetoshowyear-roundseasonalmovementstoplacethesummerincontext.

3.2Theemploymentdropmostlystemsfromincreasedoutflows

Thesummerdropinfemaleemploymentcouldreflectweakinflowstoemployment,strongoutflowsfromemployment,orboth.Alongtheinflowmargin,somewomenmightchoosetodelaylabormarketentryuntiltheendofthesummerorconductonlyalimitedjobsearchduringthesummer

months.Alongtheoutflowmargin,womenmaybesubjecttosummerlayoffsorchoosetoquit

Figure3:DecompositionofseasonalchangesinEPOPintoexcessinflowsvs.depressedoutflows

Women

1

.5

0

-.5

-1

Men

1

.5

0

-.5

-1

NetchangeinEPOP

Inflowcomponent

Outflowcomponent

Source:CurrentPopulationSurvey.

Notes:Additivedecompositionofmonth-to-monthchangesinprime-ageEPOPintocontributionsfromabove-averageinflowsandbelow-averageoutflows.ThenetchangeinEPOPreportscoefficientsestimatedfromthefirst-differencespecificationin

Equation(2).

Positivebarsegments(respectively,negativesegments)indicatethatagivenmarginboosts(lowers)EPOPinagivenmonth.See

AppendixC

fordetailsontheinflowandoutflowterms,whicharetransformationsofthecoefficientsobtainedusinggrossmonthlytransitionsintooroutofemployment.

(72.4percent)toitsnadirinSeptember2011(68.7percent).Source:BLSLaborForceStatistics,seriesLNS12300062.

11

DifferencerelativetoMay(hrs./week)

100xlogchangerelativetoMay

e

ti

t

sfsr

A

-c

d

dsg-s

betransformedtoexpressseasonalchangesinemploymentratesasexcessinflowsminusexcessoutflows.Intuitively,employmen

温馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
  • 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
  • 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
  • 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
  • 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

评论

0/150

提交评论